-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
refactor: fix ConvertToRoute for POST requests missing body and test to prove it #36660
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
ahmed-n-abdeltwab
wants to merge
5
commits into
RocketChat:develop
from
ahmed-n-abdeltwab:fix/convert-to-empty-post-route
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
df910ad
refactor: fix ConvertToRoute for POST requests missing body and test …
ahmed-n-abdeltwab a5498d9
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/convert-to-empty-post-route
ahmed-n-abdeltwab 87486ab
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/convert-to-empty-post-route
ahmed-n-abdeltwab e2a11c8
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/convert-to-empty-post-route
ahmed-n-abdeltwab b606353
fix add a good test response
ahmed-n-abdeltwab File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we make required the definition of
body: undefined? I'm afraid people will skit the body definitionalso instead of unknown should not be the case of
undefinedalso?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok i will work on that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if we make the body field required in the type definition, it’ll also end up being required for the GET method; because GET and POST are both using the same TypedOptions interface:
To fix this, we could make body optional in the base type and then create a separate type or utility that enforces it only for the methods that actually need it; like POST or PUT. This way, GET stays clean without an unnecessary body