-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FIX] REST API OAuth services endpoint were missing fields and flag to indicate custom services #10299
Merged
Merged
[FIX] REST API OAuth services endpoint were missing fields and flag to indicate custom services #10299
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c52e458
Add field to indicate whether the oauth service is customized and cha…
MarcosSpessatto 71b11e8
change comparision with boolean
MarcosSpessatto 97f205e
Merge branch 'develop' into rest-api-settings-oauth-add-field
MarcosSpessatto 45dab3c
Add missing fields when oauth service is custom
MarcosSpessatto File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you explain why you're using
Boolean(service.custom)
here when we don't use it anywhere else?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@graywolf336 to convert to Boolean if it is some value considered false by JS.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MarcosSpessatto Please reconsider another way, because if the string is
"false"
then it will result in a value oftrue
: https://stackoverflow.com/a/264037There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I'm going to change the validation, but I don't agree that the string 'false' should be considered Boolean, IMHO 'false' is a string and not a boolean, just as 'true' should be considered a string and not a boolean. So in both cases, casting a Boolean must be true. Why should I consider the string 'false'?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You misunderstood what I was saying. If the value of
service.custom
is a string and the value is'false'
then doingBoolean(service.custom)
will result intrue
being the value instead of the expectedfalse
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just for clarity:
a non-empty string in javascript evaluates to true, regardless of content of string
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The question was, why store in the database a Boolean value as a string and not as Boolean, if you expect it to be Boolean, but @graywolf336 already explained that to me. Thanks.