fix: build #85
fix: build #85
Conversation
…and improve installation commands
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rodrigopavezi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
nixpacks.toml (1)
2-3: Remove redundant Python installationPython3 is listed in both
nixPkgsandaptPkgs. Since it's already included innixPkgs, you can remove it fromaptPkgs.nixPkgs = ['nodejs_18', 'python3', 'gcc', 'gnumake'] -aptPkgs = ['build-essential', 'python3'] +aptPkgs = ['build-essential']
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/build.yml(1 hunks)nixpacks.toml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
nixpacks.toml (3)
13-16: LGTM!
The build command aligns with the GitHub Actions workflow configuration.
18-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate start command
The start command is defined twice (in both [start] and [nixpacks] sections). This is redundant and could lead to maintenance issues.
[start]
cmd = 'npm start'
[variables]
NODE_ENV = 'production'
NODE_OPTIONS = '--max_old_space_size=2048'
NPM_CONFIG_PRODUCTION = 'false'
NEXT_TELEMETRY_DISABLED = '1'
-[nixpacks]
-start-command = 'npm start'Also applies to: 27-28
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/invoicing-template#84
File: nixpacks.toml:18-19
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T12:46:04.712Z
Learning: In the `nixpacks.toml` file, duplicate start command configurations may be necessary for the build to work correctly. Avoid suggesting the removal of duplicate start commands in this file for this project.
6-11: Verify impact of --no-optional flag
The --no-optional flag skips optional dependencies. Please ensure this doesn't affect required functionality, especially for development tools or platform-specific optimizations.
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed due to missing node_modules. Let's check the package.json directly to understand the dependencies structure and any potential optional dependencies that might be affected.
Using --no-optional flag is safe for this project
The verification shows that:
- The project has no optional dependencies defined in package.json
- None of the direct dependencies declare optional dependencies that would be affected
- All dependencies are either regular runtime dependencies or development dependencies
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for optionalDependencies
jq '.optionalDependencies' package.json
# Check if any direct dependencies have important optional dependencies
npm ls --json --depth=0 | jq '.dependencies | to_entries | .[] | select(.value.optionalDependencies != null) | {package: .key, optionalDeps: .value.optionalDependencies}'
Length of output: 3088
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if any dependencies in package.json have optional dependencies by examining their package.json files
fd package.json node_modules -x jq -r 'select(.optionalDependencies != null) | "\(.name): \(.optionalDependencies | keys)"' {} 2>/dev/null
# Also check for peerDependencies since they might be affected
jq '.peerDependencies' package.json
Length of output: 171
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check complete dependencies section in package.json
jq '{dependencies, devDependencies, peerDependencies}' package.json
Length of output: 1204
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
11-11: LGTM!
Adding nixpacks.toml to the path triggers is appropriate to ensure builds run when the Nixpacks configuration changes.
Problem
It was no building on deployment environment
Changes
Add nixpacks configuration for fixing the building issues
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
nixpacks.tomlto enhance the build process with defined phases for setup, installation, and building the application.nixpacks.tomlfile during pull requests.Improvements