Skip to content

Conversation

@rodrigopavezi
Copy link
Member

@rodrigopavezi rodrigopavezi commented Feb 4, 2025

Bump version to next for now so we can demo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated key library dependencies supporting the invoice form and dashboard components, ensuring improved compatibility and preparing the app for future enhancements.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Resolved a type compatibility issue in the CreateInvoice component, enhancing stability and functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the version numbers of two dependencies in the package.json file. The version of @requestnetwork/create-invoice-form was changed from 0.12.3 to 0.12.2-next.29, and the version of @requestnetwork/invoice-dashboard was updated from 0.15.0 to 0.15.1-next.33. Additionally, in the pages/create-invoice.tsx file, the requestNetwork prop passed to the CreateInvoiceForm component was modified to cast it to any type to resolve a type mismatch issue.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
package.json Updated dependency versions: @requestnetwork/create-invoice-form from 0.12.3 to 0.12.2-next.29, and @requestnetwork/invoice-dashboard from 0.15.0 to 0.15.1-next.33.
pages/create-invoice.tsx Modified the requestNetwork prop in the CreateInvoice component to cast it to any type to address a type mismatch issue.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: release 0.11.0, add conversion, improve UI #72: The changes in the main PR are related to the same dependencies as those in the retrieved PR, specifically the @requestnetwork/create-invoice-form and @requestnetwork/invoice-dashboard.
  • chore: upgrade create-invoice-form version #80: The changes in the main PR and the retrieved PR are related as both involve updates to the version of the @requestnetwork/create-invoice-form dependency in the package.json file.
  • fix: balance issue #98: The changes in the main PR and the retrieved PR are related through the modification of the @requestnetwork/invoice-dashboard dependency in the package.json file, although they update to different versions.

Suggested reviewers

  • sstefdev
  • aimensahnoun
  • MantisClone

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b1e905 and 89dc20d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/create-invoice.tsx (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/create-invoice.tsx (1)

25-26: Consider a more type-safe solution instead of using 'any'.

While type casting to any works as a temporary solution for the demo, it bypasses TypeScript's type checking and could hide potential issues. The TODO comment suggests this is temporary, but we should track this for a proper fix.

Let's verify the package compatibility and type definitions:

Would you like me to:

  1. Open an issue to track the proper type fix?
  2. Help investigate the type mismatch between the components?
✅ Verification successful

Address the Temporary Type Casting in pages/create-invoice.tsx

The code currently bypasses TypeScript safety by forcing requestNetwork to any—a temporary measure noted by the TODO comment. Our package version query confirms that several pre-release versions (e.g., 0.12.2-next.29) are available, suggesting that the type definitions may have evolved. Although this fix serves the demo purpose, it’s advisable to track a proper type resolution by either updating to a version with improved type support or addressing the mismatch directly.

  • Consider updating the dependency or revisiting its type definitions for a more robust solution.
  • Open a tracking issue for a proper fix to remove the any casting.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the installed version and type definitions
npm list @requestnetwork/create-invoice-form
npm info @requestnetwork/create-invoice-form versions

Length of output: 1298


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rodrigopavezi rodrigopavezi merged commit 2876643 into main Feb 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@rodrigopavezi rodrigopavezi deleted the chore/bump-version branch February 4, 2025 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants