Skip to content

Conversation

@kpamnany
Copy link
Collaborator

@kpamnany kpamnany commented May 15, 2025

PR Description

Manually backported: the stripping code has been refactored upstream. Discussion on Slack.

These are used by hasmethod, and in any case including keyword argument symbols is unavoidable so there is no cost to keeping these.

Checklist

Requirements for merging:

Copy link
Member

@nickrobinson251 nickrobinson251 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please can you update the description to say this is an manual backport Please can you update the description to say this is an manual backport? Maybe link to the slack thread too https://relationalai.slack.com/archives/C01BC96H69W/p1747340708025719?thread_ts=1746720003.439789&cid=C01BC96H69W

Are we waiting on upstream to merge first?

@kpamnany
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Updated the description.

Are we waiting on upstream to merge first?

No, this has been okayed as is.

@kpamnany kpamnany merged commit dbe2575 into v1.10.2+RAI May 19, 2025
6 checks passed
@kpamnany kpamnany deleted the kp-backport-58412 branch May 19, 2025 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants