-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 441
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compilation of LAPACKE possibly independent from Fortran #834
Compilation of LAPACKE possibly independent from Fortran #834
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #834 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 0.00% 0.00%
=======================================
Files 1918 1918
Lines 188642 188645 +3
=======================================
- Misses 188642 188645 +3
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
47a668e
to
981af11
Compare
Rebased with current master. |
… Fortran compiler
f2afb48
to
bf50aff
Compare
I put a test in the CI, so it should be now good to merge |
Oh, in #972 I added fixed Fortran language use in order to introduce optional C++ use. Might want to adapt that to fix both issues properly. My gripe was that suddenly CMake requires a working C++ compiler even without LAPACK++ or BLAS++. The pkgsrc build environment is picky and only provides the compilers a package claims to need. |
Attempt to close #273.
#273 has an interesting idea in my view. If one needs only LAPACKE (for instance, if LAPACK is already installed), Fortran compiler may not be necessary. This PR is my first step towards this idea.
Still needs testing, so I am putting this as a Draft.