support NOHL and SKIPINITIALSCAN tags on FT.CREATE #125
Conversation
AvitalFineRedis
changed the title
AvitalFineRedis
force-pushed
the
NOHL_and_SKIPINITIALSCAN
branch
from
7980271 to
e8c5bd4
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #125 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 77.67% 77.99% +0.31%
==========================================
Files 13 13
Lines 1326 1336 +10
==========================================
+ Hits 1030 1042 +12
+ Misses 237 236 -1
+ Partials 59 58 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@AvitalFineRedis can we also add a flow test / or even an example to test this not only from the perspective of the client (with the unit tests) but also to confirm the create options are properly interpreted by research (with the flow tests)?
AvitalFineRedis
force-pushed
the
NOHL_and_SKIPINITIALSCAN
branch
from
b2d7b24 to
e4d70ec
Compare
…earch v1.6 compatible testing
…docs to be indexed before querying
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
![sonatype-lift[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/9843?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| flush(c) | ||
| schema := NewSchema(Options{NoOffsetVectors: true}).AddField(NewTextField("body")) | ||
|
|
||
| c.CreateIndex(schema) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
errcheck: Error return value of c.CreateIndex is not checked
(at-me in a reply with help or ignore)
2 participants
No description provided.