Release 2.20

[Ralim]

Preparing for 2.20 release

[alvinhochun]

diff --git a/source/Core/BSP/Miniware/ThermoModel.cpp b/source/Core/BSP/Miniware/ThermoModel.cpp
index 1b04bd5f..a7bc8094 100644
--- a/source/Core/BSP/Miniware/ThermoModel.cpp
+++ b/source/Core/BSP/Miniware/ThermoModel.cpp
@@ -125,6 +125,6 @@ const int32_t uVtoDegC[] = {
     38137, 500, //
 };
 #endif
-const int uVtoDegCItems = sizeof(uVtoDegC) / (2 * sizeof(uint16_t));
+const int uVtoDegCItems = sizeof(uVtoDegC) / (2 * sizeof(int32_t));
 
 uint32_t TipThermoModel::convertuVToDegC(uint32_t tipuVDelta) { return Utils::InterpolateLookupTable(uVtoDegC, uVtoDegCItems, tipuVDelta); }
diff --git a/source/Core/BSP/Pinecil/ThermoModel.cpp b/source/Core/BSP/Pinecil/ThermoModel.cpp
index 846a0a00..4515c42f 100644
--- a/source/Core/BSP/Pinecil/ThermoModel.cpp
+++ b/source/Core/BSP/Pinecil/ThermoModel.cpp
@@ -67,6 +67,6 @@ const int32_t uVtoDegC[] = {
 };
 #endif
 
-const int uVtoDegCItems = sizeof(uVtoDegC) / (2 * sizeof(uint16_t));
+const int uVtoDegCItems = sizeof(uVtoDegC) / (2 * sizeof(int32_t));
 
 uint32_t TipThermoModel::convertuVToDegC(uint32_t tipuVDelta) { return Utils::InterpolateLookupTable(uVtoDegC, uVtoDegCItems, tipuVDelta); }

I would say you should use sizeof(uVtoDegC) / (2 * sizeof(uVtoDegC[0])). But to be frank, I would probably declare uVtoDegC to be struct { int32_t a, int32_t b } so you can write sizeof(uVtoDegC) / sizeof(uVtoDegC[0]).

[Ralim]

@discip Should I just release this as is?

[discip]

@Ralim
Apart from the fact that I would like to see #1494 implemented, there is nothing hindering that from happening.