Skip to content

[rocsparse] use existing codecov executable instead of downloading - #2508

Merged
reboss merged 1 commit into
ROCm:developfrom
reboss:rocspare-codecov.io
Nov 7, 2025
Merged

reboss merged 1 commit into
ROCm:developfrom
reboss:rocspare-codecov.io

Conversation

@reboss

@reboss reboss commented Nov 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation

Use the existing codecov executable that exists in container rather than downloading every time, which can cause failures

Test Plan

We just need a pass on the codecov job for this PR

@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (69153b9) and HEAD (d743190). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (69153b9) HEAD (d743190)
hipSPARSE 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2508      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    88.65%   82.49%   -6.16%     
===========================================
  Files          301      412     +111     
  Lines        24919    32711    +7792     
===========================================
+ Hits         22091    26984    +4893     
- Misses        2828     5727    +2899     
Flag Coverage Δ
hipSPARSE ?
rocSPARSE 82.49% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 713 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@reboss
reboss merged commit fac9bf2 into ROCm:develop Nov 7, 2025
22 of 23 checks passed
assistant-librarian Bot pushed a commit to ROCm/rocSPARSE that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
[rocsparse] use existing codecov executable instead of
 downloading (#2508)

## Motivation

Use the existing `codecov` executable that exists in container rather
than downloading every time, which can cause failures

## Test Plan

We just need a pass on the codecov job for this PR
stanleytsang-amd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2026
* Move `latch` into its own file

* Move `cuda::latch` to its own file

(cherry picked from commit 06002eca3549ec497b0bca3b91f0ecbef23fffe5)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants