Skip to content

fix(hipdnn): let hipdnn-deep-review continue a published review - #14766

Merged
BrianHarrisonAMD merged 2 commits into
developfrom
users/bharriso/deep-review-resume-packaged
Oct 30, 2026
Merged

BrianHarrisonAMD merged 2 commits into
developfrom
users/bharriso/deep-review-resume-packaged

Conversation

@BrianHarrisonAMD

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

hipdnn-deep-review can now continue a review whose earlier rounds exist only as a published record someone else ran. Before this, the next round silently computed an empty set of affected files and could not close while answered questions were still listed as open.

JIRA ID : ALMIOPEN-2945

Risk Assessment

Risk 1. Skill documentation only; no script, product or build change.

Testing Summary

Testing Checklist

  • Resume a published review - deep review round 3 of fix(hip-kernel-provider): place shard test configs beside the build-tree census shard #14573 - Status: Passed (Closure: CLOSED)
  • Skill tooling tests - python3 -m pytest projects/hipdnn/tools/ai/tests - Status: Passed (333 passed, 7 skipped; 1 failure also present on develop, in hipdnn-ingestor-engine)
  • Skill validation - python3 projects/hipdnn/tools/ai/validate-skills.py - Status: Passed for this skill (same hipdnn-ingestor-engine link error as develop)
  • PR CI - GitHub PR checks - Status: Pending

Technical Changes

  • New optional input prior:<dir> for a published record of earlier rounds.
  • RUNBOOK Iterate describes how to seed $EVIDENCE from that record and settle answered open questions first.
  • affected.txt takes the previous round's files from git, so a round folder without files.txt works.

@BrianHarrisonAMD
BrianHarrisonAMD marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2026 17:43
@BrianHarrisonAMD
BrianHarrisonAMD requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2026 17:43
@BrianHarrisonAMD
BrianHarrisonAMD enabled auto-merge (squash) October 30, 2026 17:46
@therock-pr-bot

therock-pr-bot Bot commented Oct 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ All Checks Passed — Ready for Review

Check Status Details
📝 PR Description ✅ Pass —
⛔ Forbidden Files ✅ Pass —
🧪 Unit Test ✅ Pass PR does not contain code files — Unit Test auto-passed
🔎 pre-commit ✅ Pass —
🚫 Draft PR 🔜 To Be Enabled —
🚩 Feature Flag 🔜 To Be Enabled —
📊 Code Coverage 🔜 To Be Enabled —
🤖 therock-pr-bot ✅ Pass —

🎉 All checks passed! This PR is ready for review.

📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures.

🙋 Wish to Override Policy?

@therock-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 All checks passed! This PR is ready for review.

@GarbyGilbertAMD GarbyGilbertAMD left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gave it a mock run, worked nicely. LGTM!

@BrianHarrisonAMD
BrianHarrisonAMD merged commit 4fe4bf2 into develop Oct 30, 2026
44 checks passed
@BrianHarrisonAMD
BrianHarrisonAMD deleted the users/bharriso/deep-review-resume-packaged branch October 30, 2026 20:01
@assistant-librarian

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

TheRock Submodule Bump Activity

Newest first

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants