[TRITON] Fix Assert in Triton fused_kv_cache

[leonling-ll]

Assertion in triton kernel fused_qk_rope_reshape_and_cache:

assert (t == tk == tv and t_slot <= tkt == tk == tv and t_slot <= tk)

This would be inconsistant the logic in _fused_qk_rope_reshape_and_cache_kernel.
In which, there are 2 passes: 1) pid < T*QH, 2) pid >= T*QH

    if pid < T * QH:
        ...
    else:
        pid = pid - T * QH + T * KH
        if pid < T_slot * KH:
            ...

The launch grid is (n_pid = t * qh + (t_slot - t) * kh).
If assertion assumption is true (t_slot <= t), the launch grid is always <= T*QH, above else branch would be dead.

This makes CI failing: https://github.com/ROCm/ATOM/actions/runs/27060334232/job/79872120485#step:22:537

This PR aims to fix it and fix some typo.

[github-actions]

🏷️ CI Guide

Runs automatically on every PR:

• ✅ Pre-checks (submodule verification, code formatting)
• ✅ Aiter op tests (gfx942 + gfx950)
• ✅ Triton tests on MI35X (only when aiter/ops/triton/** or related paths are changed)

Extended tests (opt-in via labels):

Label	Tests
ci:triton-300x	Run an additional Triton test job on MI300X in PRs; main branch always runs both MI35X and MI300X
ci:sglang	SGLang integration tests: DeepSeek-R1-MXFP4 accuracy, Qwen 3.5 accuracy
ci:atom	ATOM benchmark: DeepSeek-R1-0528, GPT-OSS-120B
ci:atom_full	ATOM accuracy suite for PR and main models from ATOM models_accuracy.json
ci:vllm	vLLM benchmark: GPT-OSS-120B, DeepSeek-R1-0528, Kimi-K2.5
ci:all	All standard extended tests (excludes ci:atom_full)

Only add ci:atom_full for FlyDSL or Triton upgrades.
Add labels via the sidebar or gh pr edit 3601 --add-label <label>

[JiaoliangYu]

looks good to merge

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

[JiaoliangYu]

look good to