feat(review): ask each fix for its test, and rule on non-convergence

[wenshao]

What this PR does

Three linked changes to the review skill and the command that composes a review, all aimed at the number of rounds a pull request spends in the review-fix-re-review loop.

First, a finding now carries the acceptance criterion for its own fix. When a finding's suggested fix adds or changes a guard, a branch, or a behavior, the finder names the test that must go red if that fix is removed, and the posted comment closes with one sentence asking the fixer for the mutation that proves it — remove the guard, run that test, confirm it reds. The criterion never gates reporting: a finding whose fix cannot be pinned is filed anyway with an explicit not-applicable, because a bar on reporting would trade rounds for missed defects, and the separate rule that governs what evidence confirms a finding is untouched.

Second, a re-review stops renumbering its own churn. A new defect the reviewer can trace to the change that answered a previous round's finding is re-reported under that finding's original id, with a disposition that states both facts — the reported input is closed, and the change that closed it opened this. The author reads one thread per site instead of a new one every round, and the cross-round work list stops spending an id per round on a site the loop is circling. Three guardrails keep it from costing anything: attribution is a bookkeeping decision and never a posting one, so a fix-induced finding posts inline at its own severity exactly as it would under a fresh id; it applies only when the new defect is at least as severe and as confident as the entry it carries, so a blocker can never quietly become a suggestion; and anything the reviewer cannot trace takes a fresh id, which is what every round did before this rule existed.

Third, that attribution produces a count, and the count is what ends a loop the review cannot close by filing more findings. Each round hands over two integers — how many findings first appeared this round, and how many of those it attributed to the previous round's fixes — and the command owns everything downstream: the threshold, the streak it carries across rounds in the machine-readable record it already embeds in the posted review, and a blocking finding it composes itself on the second consecutive round in which most of the round's new work was work the previous round created. That finding is deterministic by provenance — the command counted it from its own record and the round's census — so no verifier is owed for it and it caps nothing; it carries no anchor, because the claim is about the pull request rather than about a line; and it asks for the only thing that can close it, which is splitting the change or reconsidering the approach.

Why it's needed

A provenance analysis of six multi-round takeover pull requests traced every finding that first appeared after the initial review back to the commit that introduced the line it anchors on. Roughly a third of them were introduced by the fix round immediately preceding the review that found them, and the dominant shape was a guard or branch added with no test of its own: the deterministic gate re-runs only the tests that exist, so an unwitnessed guard passes every gate and its hole resurfaces as a brand-new finding a round later. The loop is therefore not merely slow to converge — a measurable share of every round's work is work the previous round created.

That measurement already produced a fix on the loop side, requiring the automated fixer to mutation-probe each new guard before it commits. That half reaches exactly one fixer. Most pull requests are not fixed by a bot the review can configure — contributors and maintainers fix findings by hand, and so do other agents — and whoever fixes a finding reads only the comment. The reviewer-side half has to reach all of them, which is why the criterion moves into the finding and into the comment rather than into anyone's configuration. Everything here uses only what the review can already see: its own cross-round record, the pull request's own history, and the diff.

The convergence machinery that already shipped is all subtraction — a critical-only posting floor from round six, and a rule that holds back nits on code the previous round already read and did not flag. None of it touches the class this analysis identified, because that class is findings on code the previous round's fix just added, which the existing rules explicitly let through. Suppressing them would be wrong: they are real defects. The only honest levers are preventing their creation, accounting for them without inflating the round's apparent output, and — when neither works two rounds running — saying so as a blocker instead of filing a third round of derived findings.

Reviewer Test Plan

How to verify

Run the three changed suites and confirm they pass: cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts src/utils/findings.test.ts, and cd packages/core && npx vitest run src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts.

The behavior worth confirming by reading is the threshold and its failure directions, which the convergence suite covers case by case: a first round above the bar advances the streak and files nothing; the second consecutive round above it files a blocking finding naming both counts; a round that measured itself converging resets the streak; a round that could not measure itself carries the streak untouched rather than resetting it, and still files nothing; and a streak recovered from a posted review body, which is a surface any account can write, never files on its own without the current round's own census agreeing.

Two properties are worth checking deliberately because getting them wrong is silent. The blocking finding must ride the same channel as the other machine-computed findings rather than the model's, or it would owe a verifier that can never exist for it and would turn into a permanent cap on every round it fires; the suite pins this with a fixture where that cap genuinely can fire, plus a third arm proving the fixture detects it for an ordinary body finding. And the streak must survive the byte budget that trims the embedded record, because the pull request most likely to be churning is also the one whose record is closest to its cap; the suite locates that boundary by growing the record until each field is shed rather than by hard-coding a size.

Each new guard here was mutation-probed: deleting it, or gutting any of the pinned skill clauses, turns the suite red. Twenty-five such mutations were run and all twenty-five were caught.

One unrelated failure to expect: src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts > refuses to append over a ledger it could not read fails on this machine at a clean checkout as well, so it is pre-existing and not from this change.

Evidence (Before & After)

N/A — skill and prompt text, a composed-body rule, and their tests; no user-visible interface change.

Tested on

OS	Status
🍏 macOS	N/A
🪟 Windows	N/A
🐧 Linux	✅

Environment (optional)

Unit tests only, plus a typecheck and lint of the changed files.

Risk & Scope

• Main risk or tradeoff: the blocking finding is a blocker, so a false positive stops a pull request. Three things hold it back — it needs a majority of the round's new findings, not the measured baseline third; it needs at least four first-appearing findings, so a small round cannot trip it on rounding; and it needs two consecutive rounds. It also reads the attributed count rather than the count of findings on newly pushed lines, precisely so a pull request that merely grew between rounds is not blocked for growing.
• Not validated / out of scope: how often the threshold fires in practice can only be measured once this lands, and the constants are deliberately conservative so the first live data is about false negatives rather than false positives. The acceptance criterion's effect on round counts is likewise a live measurement. Findings that re-scan pre-existing code are a separate class and are not addressed here.
• Breaking changes / migration notes: none. Every new field is optional on both sides — a review composed without a census behaves exactly as before, and a record written by an older round parses unchanged.

Linked Issues

None.

中文说明

本 PR 做了什么

对 review skill 与负责组装 review 的命令做了三处相互关联的改动，目标都是减少一个 PR 在「审查—修复—再审查」循环中消耗的轮次。

其一，finding 现在自带其修复的验收标准。当一条 finding 的建议修复新增或改动了 guard、分支或行为时，发现者需要指明「若该修复被移除，哪个测试必须变红」，并且发布到 PR 上的评论会以一句话收尾，请求修复者做一次 mutation 验证——删掉 guard、跑那个测试、确认它变红。该标准永不阻断上报：无法钉住修复的 finding 依然照常上报并显式标注 not applicable，因为在上报环节设卡等于用漏掉缺陷换取轮次，而另一条「什么证据才算确认一条 finding」的规则完全未变。

其二，再审查不再给自己制造的返工重新编号。如果审查者能把一个新缺陷追溯到「回应上一轮某条 finding 的那次改动」，该缺陷会以那条 finding 的原始 id 重新上报，并给出同时陈述两个事实的裁定——原先报告的输入已经关闭，而关闭它的改动打开了这个新缺陷。作者由此每个位点只读一个 thread，而不是每轮新开一个；跨轮工作清单也不再为一个循环打转的位点每轮消耗一个 id。三条护栏确保它不产生代价：归因只是记账、绝不是发布决策，因此 fix-induced 的 finding 依旧按自身严重级别以行内评论发布，与用新 id 发布毫无差别；只有当新缺陷的严重级别与置信度都不低于它所承接的条目时才适用，因此阻塞项绝不可能悄悄降级为建议；凡是无法追溯的一律铸造新 id，这也正是本规则出现之前每一轮的行为。

其三，这种归因会产生一个计数，而这个计数正是终结「继续报 finding 也关不掉」的循环的东西。每一轮交出两个整数——本轮首次出现的 finding 有多少条，其中被归因于上一轮修复的有多少条——下游全部由该命令掌管：门槛、跨轮携带的连续计数（存放在它本就嵌入已发布 review 的机读记录中），以及在「本轮新增工作大部分是上一轮制造出来的」连续第二轮时，由它自行组装的一条阻塞性 finding。该 finding 按来源即为确定性的——由命令依据自身记录与本轮普查算出——因此无需 verifier，也不会 cap 任何东西；它不带代码锚点，因为该主张针对的是整个 PR 而非某一行；并且它只要求唯一能关闭它的东西：拆分改动，或重新考虑所采用的方案。

为什么需要

对六个多轮 takeover PR 做的溯源分析，把每一条「首轮之后才首次出现」的 finding 回溯到引入其锚定行的那个 commit。其中约三分之一由紧邻的上一轮修复引入，且主要形态是新增的 guard 或分支没有自己的测试：确定性 gate 只重跑已存在的测试，因此没有 witness 的 guard 会通过所有 gate，其漏洞则在一轮之后作为全新 finding 重新浮现。所以这个循环不只是收敛慢——每一轮中都有可观测的一部分工作，是上一轮自己制造出来的。

该测量已经在循环侧产生了一个修复：要求自动修复器在提交前对每个新 guard 做 mutation 验证。那一半只能触达一个修复者。大多数 PR 并不是由 review 能够配置的 bot 来修复的——贡献者和维护者手工修复 finding，其他 agent 也一样——而任何修复者能读到的只有评论。审查者这一半必须触达所有人，这正是验收标准被放进 finding 与评论、而不是放进任何人的配置的原因。这里的一切只使用 review 本就能看见的东西：它自己的跨轮记录、PR 自身的历史，以及 diff。

已经上线的收敛机制全都是做减法——第六轮起只发布 Critical，以及一条对「上一轮已读过且未标记」的代码压住小问题的规则。它们都没有触及本次分析识别出的那一类，因为那一类正是「落在上一轮修复刚添加的代码上的 finding」，而现有规则明确放行了它们。压制它们是错的：它们是真实缺陷。诚实的杠杆只有三个：阻止它们被制造出来；在不虚增本轮表面产出的前提下把它们记清楚；以及当前两者连续两轮都失效时，直接以阻塞项说明情况，而不是再报第三轮派生出来的 finding。

评审者测试计划

如何验证

运行三个改动过的测试套件并确认通过：cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts src/utils/findings.test.ts，以及 cd packages/core && npx vitest run src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts。

值得逐条阅读确认的是门槛及其失败方向，收敛套件对每种情况都有覆盖：首次越过门槛的一轮只推进连续计数、不上报任何东西；连续第二轮越过门槛时上报一条阻塞性 finding 并写明两个计数；自测为已收敛的一轮把连续计数清零；无法完成测量的一轮原样携带连续计数而非清零，且同样不上报；而从已发布 review 正文中恢复出来的连续计数——那是任何账号都可写入的表面——在本轮自身普查不同意的情况下绝不单独触发上报。

有两条性质值得刻意检查，因为一旦搞错是无声的。这条阻塞性 finding 必须与其他机器算出的 finding 走同一条通道、而非模型那条，否则它会欠下一个对它而言永远不可能存在的 verifier，并变成每次触发都产生的永久 cap；测试用一个「该 cap 确实可能触发」的夹具钉住这一点，并额外用第三条断言证明该夹具对普通正文 finding 确实能检测到。另外，连续计数必须能挺过用于裁剪嵌入记录的字节预算，因为最可能在打转的 PR 恰恰也是记录最贴近上限的那个；测试通过不断增长记录直至各字段被逐一舍弃来定位该边界，而不是硬编码一个尺寸。

这里每一个新增守卫都做过 mutation 验证：删掉它，或掏空任何一条被钉住的 skill 条款，套件都会变红。总共运行了二十五个这样的变异，二十五个全部被捕获。

有一个与本改动无关的失败需要预期：src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts > refuses to append over a ledger it could not read 在本机干净检出时同样失败，因此属于既有问题，并非本次引入。

证据（改动前后对比）

N/A —— skill 与提示词文本、一条组装正文的规则，以及它们的测试；没有用户可见的界面改动。

测试环境

OS	状态
🍏 macOS	N/A
🪟 Windows	N/A
🐧 Linux	✅

运行环境（可选）

仅单元测试，另加对改动文件的类型检查与 lint。

风险与范围

• 主要风险或权衡：这条 finding 是阻塞性的，因此一次误报会卡住一个 PR。有三点对它形成约束——它要求本轮新增 finding 的多数，而不是测得的三分之一基线；它要求至少四条首次出现的 finding，因此小轮次无法靠取整误触发；它还要求连续两轮。它读取的是归因计数而非「落在新推行上的 finding 数」，正是为了不让一个仅仅在轮次之间长大的 PR 因为长大而被阻塞。
• 未验证 / 范围之外：门槛在实践中的触发频率只能等本改动上线后测量，因此常数取值刻意保守，好让第一批线上数据反映的是漏报而非误报。验收标准对轮次数量的实际效果同样需要线上测量。「重复扫描既有代码」是另一类问题，本 PR 未涉及。
• 破坏性改动 / 迁移说明：无。两侧的每个新字段都是可选的——不带普查组装出的 review 行为与之前完全一致，旧轮次写下的记录也照常解析。

关联 Issue

无。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

✅ Qwen Triage finished — view run. See the stage comments in this thread for the result.

✅ Qwen Triage 已完成 —— 查看运行。结果见本线程中的各阶段评论。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Re-run after the takeover rounds — gate re-checked at the current head.

Template looks good ✓

• Problem: observed and measured, not theoretical — a provenance analysis of six multi-round review PRs traced roughly a third of post-round-1 findings to the immediately preceding fix round, and that measurement already produced the fixer-side half (fix(autofix): mutation-probe new guards before a round commits #9578). This PR is the reviewer-side half built on the same evidence. If you want a live specimen of the loop it targets, this PR's own thread is one: the takeover cycle ground through several rounds of exactly this fix-introduced rework.
• Direction: aligned. It iterates on the repo's own review infrastructure — the bundled review skill and the command that composes reviews — and AGENTS.md already codifies the "don't let review rounds balloon" concern this attacks. No auth/sandbox/model-selection/telemetry/release or public-contract surface involved (the new fixWitness field is optional and backward-compatible).
• Size: core paths are touched (packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/**, plus the cli review command). At the current head: 608 production logic lines (TS), ~1340 test lines, 31 lines of skill docs (SKILL.md + DESIGN.md). Author is a maintainer of this exact subsystem, so the two-tier core gate does not apply; numbers reported for awareness.
• Approach: the three linked levers still hang together — prevent creation (acceptance criterion in each finding), account for churn without inflating output (fix-induced findings re-reported under the original id), and stop a loop neither lever closes (census + streak + a command-composed blocking finding). The diff roughly doubled since the first gate pass (~830 → ~1980 lines), and the growth is not scope creep: it is the /review rounds' findings addressed — chiefly the cross-account churn-state seam in pr-context.ts (a streak surviving recovery of another account's marker was a round-1 Critical), plus tests pinning each new guard. Every hunk still serves one of the three levers; nothing to split out.
• Risk: no elevated risk signals — none of the changed files match the revert-correlated path patterns.

Moving on to code review. 🔍

中文说明

takeover 各轮之后的 re-run —— 已在当前 head 重新过 gate。

模板完整 ✓

• 问题：已观测且有度量，不是理论性问题——对六个多轮 review PR 的溯源分析显示，首轮之后出现的 finding 约有三分之一来自紧邻的上一轮修复；该测量已先产出修复侧的一半（fix(autofix): mutation-probe new guards before a round commits #9578）。本 PR 是建立在同一证据上的审查者侧一半。若想看一个活标本：本 PR 自己的线程就是——takeover 循环碾过多轮此类「修复引入的返工」。
• 方向：对齐。改动的是本仓库自己的 review 基础设施——内置 review skill 与组装 review 的命令——AGENTS.md 本就写有「不要让 review 轮次膨胀」的关切。不涉及 auth/沙箱/模型选择/遥测/发布或公共契约（新增的 fixWitness 字段可选且向后兼容）。
• 规模：触及核心路径（packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/** 及 cli review 命令）。当前 head：生产逻辑行 608（TS），测试行约 1340，skill 文档 31 行（SKILL.md + DESIGN.md）。作者正是该子系统的维护者，两层核心门禁不适用；列出数字仅供知悉。
• 方案：三个关联杠杆依然互相咬合——阻止产生（每条 finding 携带验收标准）、在不虚增产出的前提下记账（fix 引入的 finding 以原 id 重新上报）、以及在前两者都无法关闭循环时止损（普查 + 连续计数 + 由命令组装的阻塞性 finding）。自首次 gate 以来 diff 大约翻倍（约 830 → 约 1980 行），但增长不是范围蔓延：而是对 /review 各轮所提问题的落实——主要是 pr-context.ts 中的跨账号 churn 状态接缝（「连续计数在恢复出他人 marker 后仍存续」曾是首轮 Critical），以及为每个新守卫补上的测试。每个 hunk 仍服务于三个杠杆之一，没有可拆出去的东西。
• 风险：无升级风险信号——改动文件均未命中与 revert 相关的路径模式。

进入代码审查。🔍

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max

_{Reviewed at a0d09e0830729e0014b74101637eb7e896bd699c · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Code review (re-run at the current head)

Full diff re-read at the reviewed commit — the takeover rounds added roughly 1100 lines since the last pass, mostly the cross-account churn seam and its tests. Still no blockers; the parts that could silently go wrong remain the parts the tests pin. What I verified by reading the code at this head, not just the description:

• The verdict lives where the data lives. The census arrives from model-written compose state (convergence passes through submit.ts's spread — only env/prBodyFetcher/draftedComments are stripped — so no new loader was needed) and is treated as untrusted throughout: churnCensusOf refuses induced > fresh, floats, negatives, and half-pairs, failing toward "decide nothing". The bar is integer arithmetic (induced * 2 >= fresh, majority, CHURN_MIN_FRESH = 4). The one-sided cross-check refuses a census that out-counts everything this round actually reports across the three channels (drafted comments + body Criticals + deferrals), so an unreported majority cannot arm the streak.
• The streak state machine fails late, never early. Absence, malformed pairs, and sub-minimum censuses all CARRY; only a measured below-bar census with ≥4 fresh RESETS; round 1 and context-unavailable refuse the census outright. Filing needs this round's OWN above-bar census beside a streak at the bar — a recovered or forged streak alone files nothing ("never files on a recovered streak alone" is pinned), so the worst a planted marker buys is one round of earliness, and the filed text hands the decision to a person.
• The blocker rides the gate channel, not the model's. Re-confirmed at this head: bodyCriticals.push(nonConvergence) lands after the modelBodyCriticals snapshot and before c = criticalsInline + bodyCriticals.length, so it renders, forces REQUEST_CHANGES, and never enters the verifier-delivery floor — moved above the snapshot it would become an unsatisfiable permanent cap. The fixture test carries a third arm proving it detects an ordinary model Critical, so the pin is not vacuous.
• The new cross-account seam is the growth since the last pass, and it is handled at every write path. stripChurnState drops churn from a foreign winner at the recovery seam (same class of claim as the anchor); the union restores this account's OWN streak ungated by the round gap — a cumulative counter, where the interleaved foreign round is an unmeasured round — but restores only own state, since the winner's was stripped above. persistRecoveredLedger carries the side file's streak only when identity is known, NO own marker was read, and the streak survives streakOf plus a clamp to the round being written; an own marker that reset is authoritative and never resurrected (ownMarkerRead unset reads as read — the fail-safe direction: the blocker files late, never early). The anonymous counter-advance drops churn and the anonymous whole-write sheds it, so a foreign streak reaches the side file on no path.
• The byte budget sheds in the right order. The streak sits ABOVE the shed cascade — the PRs most likely to churn are the ones whose markers sit closest to the cap, and shedding it there would disarm the mechanism exactly where it's needed. Clamped to LEDGER_MAX_ROUND on write and to the marker's own round on read, omitted at zero. The boundary tests locate the boundary by growing the fixture until the carried volume is what stops fitting — with a one-byte-below control — and a second test discriminates the streak's placement at the rung where posted itself sheds.
• The fix-witness half reaches the launched agents, not just the skill text. FINDING_FORMAT in agent-prompt.ts carries the new **Fix witness:** line with the N/A exemption, and the new brief-level test pins both halves plus the exemption tail through a BUILT brief — the shape that once shipped green with the mandate silently deleted. fixWitness in findings.ts follows the witness pattern exactly (camelCase + snake_case, absence stays absence) and the test pins that the two fields never collapse. SKILL.md gains the fix-induced disposition with a mechanical two-operand test and four guardrails, the census contract ("You count; the module rules"), and Step 7's one-sentence comment rule — each clause pinned by a SKILL.test.ts assertion.
• Reuse & conventions: streakOf is deliberately separate from volumeOf (different ceilings, rationale documented); CHURN_FIELDS/withoutChurn/pickChurn mirror the volume group's shared-projection pattern — the same lesson withoutVolume's history comment records paying for. ESM .js imports, unknown + narrowing instead of any, colocated tests, kebab-case files.

Two non-blocking nits: the Reviewer Test Plan lists four of the seven test suites the diff now changes (agent-prompt.test.ts, pr-context-persist.test.ts, and pr-context.test.ts landed in later autofix rounds) — CI exercises all of them regardless; and Linked Issues still says "None" although the PR describes itself as the reviewer-side half of #9578, which the template asks to reference non-closing.

The cross-round trust split, as a diagram:

sequenceDiagram
    participant P1 as Round N reviewer (model)
    participant P2 as compose-review (module)
    participant P3 as Posted review body with ledger marker
    participant P4 as Side file (recovery seam)
    participant P5 as Round N+1 reviewer (model)
    P1->>P2: census (fresh, induced) or absence
    P2->>P2: validate, compare to bar, advance, reset or carry streak
    P2->>P3: stamp churnRounds into the marker — census stays per-round
    P3->>P4: next round recovers the marker, churn stripped from foreign winners
    P4->>P5: own streak handed over with the work list
    P5->>P2: next census
    P2->>P3: files the not-converging blocker only with an own above-bar census in hand

Loading

Files changed (14)

File	What changed
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts	The convergence decision: census validation, churn bar, streak arithmetic, and the command-composed blocker pushed onto the gate channel
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts	21 tests pinning the census, the bar's failure directions, streak carry/reset, forgery guards, and the channel placement
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.ts	churnRounds field, streakOf, serialization above the shed cascade, clamped parse
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts	Byte-boundary and forgery tests for the streak's survival and clamping
packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.ts	Cross-account seam: churn strip on foreign winners, own-state restore in the union, streak carry when no own marker was read
packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts	Persistence tests for strip/restore/carry/reset semantics and the ownMarkerRead fail-safe
packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts	Recovery tests: foreign churn dropped, own churn restored
packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.ts	Fix witness line and its mandate paragraph in the finder brief format
packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts	Pins the mandate and the N/A exemption through a built brief
packages/cli/src/utils/findings.ts	Optional fixWitness artifact field, distinct from witness
packages/cli/src/utils/findings.test.ts	Round-trip and distinctness pins for fixWitness
packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.md	The fix-induced disposition, census contract, compose-state bullet, and Step 7 posting rule
packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts	Pins the skill clauses whose deletion would make the rules go inert
packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/DESIGN.md	The provenance-analysis writeup the rules cite

Test evidence — the PR's own CI, read via API

Unattended CI run: no code from this PR was built or executed here. On the reviewed commit, the PR's own CI is fully green — no failed and no pending checks:

Check	Conclusion
Qwen Code CI (workflow)	✅ success
Security Checks (workflow)	✅ success
Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)	✅ success
Desktop Shell (ubuntu-22.04)	✅ success
Desktop Shell (windows-2022)	✅ success
web-shell E2E Smoke (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)	✅ success
Classify PR	✅ success
Secret scan (TruffleHog)	✅ success
Dependency CVE audit	✅ success
Test (macos-latest, Node 22.x)	⏭️ skipped
Test (windows-latest, Node 22.x)	⏭️ skipped
Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox)	⏭️ skipped

The three skipped checks are the repo's normal configuration — the merged PR 9716 shows the identical skip pattern on its head — not gating caused by this PR. One note on the author's Test Plan: it mentions a run-ledger.test.ts failure as pre-existing on their machine; the ubuntu suite is green at this head, so whatever that local failure is, it does not reproduce in CI. The author's claim of 25 mutation probes is theirs, not independently re-run here — but the suite's tests name the new symbols and exercise each threshold direction case by case, so the change is pinned by CI in the ordinary sense. A sandboxed @qwen-code /verify run triggered by the same command is still in flight; its report will post separately.

Real-scenario testing: N/A — skill text, compose-rule logic, and tests; no user-visible interface, and this is an unattended CI run in any case.

中文说明

代码审查（在当前 head 上重跑）

已在被审 commit 上通读全部 diff —— takeover 各轮较上次审查新增约 1100 行，主要是跨账号 churn 接缝及其测试。仍然没有阻塞项；可能悄悄出错的部分依然是测试所钉住的部分。以下是我在当前 head 上读代码（而非只读描述）核实过的内容：

• 裁决与数据同处一地。 普查来自模型写的 compose state（convergence 经由 submit.ts 的展开透传——只剥离 env/prBodyFetcher/draftedComments——因此不需要新的加载器），并全程按不可信输入对待：churnCensusOf 拒绝 induced > fresh、浮点、负数与半对输入，失败方向一律是「不做裁决」。门槛为整数运算（induced * 2 >= fresh、过半、CHURN_MIN_FRESH = 4）。单向交叉核对会拒绝超过本轮三通道（行内草稿 + 正文 Critical + 延迟清单）实际报告总量的普查，因此未上报的「多数」无法武装连续计数。
• 连续计数状态机只可能迟到、不可能提前。 缺失、畸形、低于下限的普查一律携带；只有「测得且低于门槛、fresh ≥ 4」的普查才清零；第 1 轮与 context-unavailable 直接拒绝普查。上报阻塞项需要本轮自身越过门槛的普查与达到门槛的连续计数同时在场——仅凭恢复出的或伪造的连续计数不会上报任何东西（「绝不仅凭恢复出的连续计数上报」有测试钉住），因此植入的 marker 至多换来一轮的提前，且上报文案把决定权交还给人。
• 阻塞项走门禁通道，而非模型通道。 已在当前 head 复核：bodyCriticals.push(nonConvergence) 落在 modelBodyCriticals 快照之后、c = criticalsInline + bodyCriticals.length 之前，因此它会渲染、会强制 REQUEST_CHANGES，且永不进入 verifier 交付下限——若移到快照之上就会变成无法满足的永久 cap。测试夹具带第三条断言证明它对普通模型 Critical 可检出，钉扎不是空转。
• 新的跨账号接缝是上次审查以来的主要增量，每条写路径都有处理。 stripChurnState 在恢复接缝处剥离外部获胜者的 churn（与锚点同类的主张）；并集恢复本账号自己的连续计数时不受轮次差约束——它是累计计数器，插入的外部轮次是一次「未测量」轮——但只恢复自己的状态，因为获胜者的状态已在上面被剥离。persistRecoveredLedger 仅在身份已知、未读到自己的 marker、且连续计数通过 streakOf 并被钳制到写入轮次时，才携带侧文件的计数；自己的 marker 若已清零则是权威、绝不被复活（ownMarkerRead 未设置按「已读」处理——失败安全方向：阻塞项只会迟到、不会提前）。匿名计数推进分支丢弃 churn、匿名整体写入也舍弃它，因此外部连续计数没有任何路径进入侧文件。
• 字节预算的舍弃顺序正确。 连续计数位于舍弃级联之上——最可能打转的 PR 恰是 marker 最贴近上限的那个，在那里舍弃它等于在最需要它的地方解除武装。写入时钳制到 LEDGER_MAX_ROUND、读取时钳制到 marker 自身轮次，为零时省略。边界测试通过不断增长夹具直到携带的体量恰好放不下为止来定位边界——带低一字节的对照——另有测试在 posted 本身被舍弃的梯级上区分连续计数的放置位置。
• fix-witness 那一半触达被启动的 agent，而不只是 skill 文本。 agent-prompt.ts 的 FINDING_FORMAT 带上了新的 **Fix witness:** 行与 N/A 豁免，新的 brief 级测试则通过构建好的 brief 钉住两半及豁免尾部——正是「删除约束却绿」曾经得逞的形态。findings.ts 的 fixWitness 完全沿用 witness 的模式（camelCase + snake_case、缺省即缺省），并有测试钉住两个字段绝不合并。SKILL.md 新增 fix-induced 裁定（机械的双操作数测试 + 四条护栏）、普查契约（「你计数，模块裁决」）与 Step 7 的一句话评论规则——每一条款都由 SKILL.test.ts 的断言钉住。
• 复用与规范： streakOf 刻意独立于 volumeOf（上限不同，理由有文档）；CHURN_FIELDS/withoutChurn/pickChurn 镜像体量组共享投影的模式——正是 withoutVolume 历史注释记录的、已经付过学费的教训。ESM .js 导入、unknown + 收窄而非 any、测试与源码同目录、kebab-case 文件名。

两个不阻塞的小问题：Reviewer Test Plan 只列出七处改动测试套件中的四处（agent-prompt.test.ts、pr-context-persist.test.ts、pr-context.test.ts 是后续 autofix 轮次加入的）——CI 反正全部都会跑；Linked Issues 仍写「无」，而 PR 自述是 #9578 的审查者侧一半，模板要求在那里做非关闭引用。

测试证据 —— PR 自己的 CI，经 API 读取

无人值守 CI 运行：此处未构建或执行本 PR 的任何代码。在被审 commit 上，PR 自己的 CI 全绿——无失败、无进行中：表格见英文部分（由收尾任务按标记维护）。三个 skipped 检查是仓库的常规配置——已合入的 PR 9716 其 head 上的跳过模式完全相同——并非本 PR 导致的门禁。关于作者测试计划的一点说明：其提到 run-ledger.test.ts 在其本机为既有失败；当前 head 的 ubuntu 套件为绿，无论那个本地失败是什么，都未在 CI 中复现。作者「25 个变异探针」的声明是其自述、此处未独立复跑——但该套件测试点名了新符号并逐例演练各门槛方向，因此按通常意义 CI 已钉住改动。同一命令触发的沙箱 @qwen-code /verify 运行仍在进行，报告将另行发布。

真实场景测试：N/A —— skill 文本、组装规则逻辑与测试；无用户可见界面，且本次本就是无人值守 CI 运行。

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max

_{Reviewed at a0d09e0830729e0014b74101637eb7e896bd699c · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Confidence: 4/5 — solid across every stage on the re-run; the two nits are cosmetic (Test Plan lists four of seven changed suites; Linked Issues still omits the #9578 reference), and the one standing reservation is inherent: the prompt-side half can only be measured live.

Stepping back: my independent sketch of this problem — written before reading the diff — landed on the same three levers (acceptance criterion in the finding, attribution instead of renumbering, deterministic count-and-stop), so the approach never felt anchored onto; I was comparing, not confirming. What the takeover rounds added since the first pass is exactly the part I would have worried about most: the streak now crosses account boundaries, and every seam where a foreign or forged marker could enter — recovery, union, anonymous advance, side-file carry — has an explicit rule, a fail-late direction, and a test. The growth reads as hardening earned by review, not scope creep.

The honest reservations, unchanged and non-blocking: the census is a model-written number, and the one-sided cross-check bounds but does not eliminate a round's ability to supply its own blocking inputs — though the blocker grants no capability a round doesn't already have (it could just file Criticals), so the residual risk is a false-positive block, and the constants (majority, ≥4 fresh, two consecutive rounds) are set against it. And the fix-witness half reaches humans and arbitrary agents only through prose, so its effect on round counts is a live measurement — stated plainly in the PR, not oversold. The pre-existing run-ledger.test.ts failure the author mentions does not reproduce in CI at this head, so it is not a merge concern.

CI is green on the reviewed commit (ubuntu suite, security checks, desktop and web-shell smoke; the macOS/windows/integration skips match the repo's normal configuration), so no deferred-approval marker this time. Approving, pinned to the commit reviewed above.

中文说明

置信度：4/5 —— re-run 各阶段都很扎实；两个小问题是外观性的（Test Plan 只列了七个改动套件中的四个；Linked Issues 仍未引用 #9578），唯一长期保留意见则是固有的：提示词那一半只能靠线上度量。

退一步看：我在读 diff 之前写下的独立构想落在同样的三个杠杆上（finding 内嵌验收标准、归因代替重新编号、确定性计数并止损），因此这个方案从来不是被锚定着去确认的，而是在做对照。自首次审查以来 takeover 各轮新增的，恰是我最担心的部分：连续计数现在要跨账号边界，而每一个外部或伪造 marker 可能进入的接缝——恢复、并集、匿名推进、侧文件携带——都有了明确的规则、迟到而非提前的失败方向，以及测试。这些增量读起来是经 review 锤炼出的加固，而非范围蔓延。

诚实的保留意见，不变且不阻塞：普查是模型写的数字，单向交叉核对能约束但无法杜绝某一轮自行提供阻塞自己所需输入的能力——不过阻塞项并未授予一轮本就不具备的能力（它本可以直接报 Critical），因此残余风险是误报阻塞，而常数（过半、≥4 条 fresh、连续两轮）正是针对它设置的。而 fix-witness 那一半只通过文字触达人类与任意 agent，其对轮次数量的效果是线上度量——PR 对此直言不讳，没有夸大。作者提到的既有 run-ledger.test.ts 失败在当前 head 的 CI 中未复现，因此不构成合并关切。

被审 commit 的 CI 为绿（ubuntu 套件、安全检查、desktop 与 web-shell smoke；macOS/windows/integration 的跳过与仓库常规配置一致），因此这次不需要延迟批准标记。予以批准，锚定在上面审查过的 commit。

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max

_{Reviewed at a0d09e0830729e0014b74101637eb7e896bd699c · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Package	Lines	Statements	Functions	Branches
CLI	85.13%	85.13%	90.53%	84.17%
Core	88.19%	88.19%	89.8%	86.76%

CLI Package - Full Text Report

-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
File               | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | Uncovered Line #s 
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
All files          |   85.13 |    84.17 |   90.53 |   85.13 |                   
 src               |   85.83 |    81.72 |   88.13 |   85.83 |                   
  cli.ts           |   95.68 |    84.11 |     100 |   95.68 | ...60-561,565-566 
  gemini.tsx       |    73.4 |    78.04 |   80.76 |    73.4 | ...1338-1342,1469 
  ...ractiveCli.ts |   88.25 |    82.33 |   89.06 |   88.25 | ...3147,3153,3219 
  ...liCommands.ts |   88.93 |    83.21 |      80 |   88.93 | ...97-599,615,721 
  ...ActiveAuth.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 66-80             
 ...cp-integration |   72.61 |    75.19 |    91.9 |   72.61 |                   
  acpAgent.ts      |   71.75 |     74.8 |   91.25 |   71.75 | ...76,13181-13183 
  ...k-reporter.ts |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 81,84,119,141     
  authMethods.ts   |      92 |       60 |     100 |      92 | 33-34             
  ...heap-probe.ts |   97.39 |    96.66 |     100 |   97.39 | 243,264-265       
  errorCodes.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-skills.ts |     100 |    88.23 |     100 |     100 | 17,32             
  generation.ts    |    97.1 |    81.25 |     100 |    97.1 | 109,112           
  ...figuration.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...DirContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ration/service |    97.1 |    95.89 |   93.75 |    97.1 |                   
  filesystem.ts    |    97.1 |    95.89 |   93.75 |    97.1 | ...22-123,246-247 
 ...ration/session |    91.2 |     86.5 |   95.96 |    91.2 |                   
  Session.ts       |   90.56 |    85.19 |   95.41 |   90.56 | ...69,12296-12300 
  ...entTracker.ts |   96.81 |    89.36 |      90 |   96.81 | 137-143,222       
  ...projection.ts |   98.85 |    91.59 |     100 |   98.85 | 234,250,262       
  ...stop-guard.ts |     100 |    98.07 |     100 |     100 | 37,127            
  ...eplay-page.ts |   94.18 |     86.3 |     100 |   94.18 | ...15,319,399,403 
  ...y-replayer.ts |   83.17 |    92.98 |   94.11 |   83.17 | ...24-142,260-262 
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-40              
  ...ssionUtils.ts |   89.76 |    87.32 |     100 |   89.76 | ...54-270,326-328 
  ...oal-update.ts |   98.61 |    97.29 |     100 |   98.61 | 64                
  ...lure-guard.ts |   98.32 |    97.72 |     100 |   98.32 | 294-295,340-341   
  tasksSnapshot.ts |    94.3 |     87.5 |     100 |    94.3 | 65-71             
  ...on-tracker.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ssion/emitters |   95.62 |    92.73 |   97.05 |   95.62 |                   
  ...ageEmitter.ts |   95.25 |    93.54 |     100 |   95.25 | ...08-115,128-129 
  PlanEmitter.ts   |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 66                
  base-emitter.ts  |   78.26 |    77.77 |     100 |   78.26 | 23-24,26-28       
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-10              
  ...ll-emitter.ts |   98.57 |    94.84 |     100 |   98.57 | 75-76,394-395     
 ...ession/rewrite |    91.8 |    89.13 |   94.44 |    91.8 |                   
  LlmRewriter.ts   |    82.4 |     86.2 |     100 |    82.4 | ...,88-89,166-170 
  ...Middleware.ts |   96.96 |    88.09 |     100 |   96.96 | 144,152-154       
  TurnBuffer.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 src/agent-view    |      89 |    81.59 |   91.53 |      89 |                   
  attach-lease.ts  |     100 |    96.96 |     100 |     100 | 173               
  ...t-cli-argv.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ged-detach.ts |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 40,64             
  protocol.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  pty-host-env.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...st-process.ts |   87.99 |     77.6 |   94.28 |   87.99 | ...1219,1309-1311 
  pty-host.ts      |   84.51 |    85.04 |   90.69 |   84.51 | ...14-516,531-532 
  ...sor-client.ts |   80.38 |    72.81 |   77.41 |   80.38 | ...22-626,652-656 
  ...or-process.ts |   96.61 |    89.47 |   84.61 |   96.61 | 129-130,150-151   
  ...sor-runner.ts |    84.9 |     75.6 |      85 |    84.9 | ...44,468,471-481 
  ...sor-server.ts |   85.71 |    83.06 |   95.45 |   85.71 | ...67-468,471-488 
  ...isor-store.ts |   97.73 |    81.16 |     100 |   97.73 | ...92,594,607,643 
  ...nal-bridge.ts |   93.98 |    91.54 |   83.33 |   93.98 | 228-238           
  ...r-sideband.ts |   95.37 |    86.44 |     100 |   95.37 | 203-204,228-233   
 src/commands      |   90.38 |    77.48 |   65.62 |   90.38 |                   
  auth.ts          |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 11,14             
  channel.ts       |   55.55 |      100 |       0 |   55.55 | 18-22,30-40       
  extensions.tsx   |   96.77 |      100 |      50 |   96.77 | 39                
  hooks.tsx        |   66.66 |      100 |       0 |   66.66 | 20-24             
  mcp.ts           |   95.45 |      100 |      50 |   95.45 | 31                
  review.ts        |   98.85 |      100 |      50 |   98.85 | 98                
  serve.ts         |   88.95 |    74.52 |     100 |   88.95 | ...74,877-880,892 
  sessions.ts      |     100 |      100 |      50 |     100 |                   
  update.ts        |   98.13 |    94.44 |   66.66 |   98.13 | 82-83             
 ...mmands/channel |   89.08 |    88.57 |   90.64 |   89.08 |                   
  channel-cwd.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...l-registry.ts |   94.88 |    95.49 |      90 |   94.88 | ...20-323,368-371 
  ...entry-path.ts |      75 |       50 |     100 |      75 | 8-9               
  config-utils.ts  |   95.88 |    96.35 |     100 |   95.88 | ...08-213,271-274 
  configure.ts     |    14.7 |      100 |       0 |    14.7 | 18-21,23-84       
  daemon-worker.ts |   93.91 |    85.61 |   94.33 |   93.91 | ...1264,1271-1272 
  loop-runtime.ts  |   91.66 |      100 |      50 |   91.66 | 15,22             
  ...classifier.ts |   98.53 |    96.66 |     100 |   98.53 | 115-116,161       
  ...tact-store.ts |   93.51 |    87.65 |     100 |   93.51 | ...71,288-289,337 
  pairing.ts       |      75 |      100 |      50 |      75 | 22-28,59-70       
  pidfile.ts       |   95.55 |       90 |     100 |   95.55 | ...50-251,315-316 
  proxy.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  reload.ts        |    77.5 |    86.95 |      75 |    77.5 | 72-84,93-97       
  runtime.ts       |   82.43 |    86.44 |     100 |   82.43 | ...87-191,251-253 
  set.ts           |   75.72 |    85.71 |      50 |   75.72 | 65-83,111-116     
  start.ts         |    85.8 |    82.17 |      88 |    85.8 | ...85,591-594,606 
  ...ure-format.ts |   93.65 |    82.45 |     100 |   93.65 | ...42,48-49,74-75 
  status.ts        |   78.57 |    59.25 |   66.66 |   78.57 | ...36-137,150-161 
  stop.ts          |   57.83 |    82.35 |      50 |   57.83 | ...3,74-76,85-111 
 ...nds/extensions |   88.85 |    87.91 |   87.09 |   88.85 |                   
  consent.ts       |   72.53 |    90.32 |   42.85 |   72.53 | ...86-142,157-163 
  disable.ts       |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 30                
  enable.ts        |     100 |    91.66 |     100 |     100 | 38                
  install.ts       |   82.95 |    81.57 |      75 |   82.95 | ...96-199,202-211 
  link.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  list.ts          |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 18                
  new.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  settings.ts      |   99.15 |      100 |   83.33 |   99.15 | 151               
  sources.ts       |   93.42 |    87.09 |   92.85 |   93.42 | ...4-66,96-98,167 
  uninstall.ts     |   74.57 |       40 |   66.66 |   74.57 | 45-47,60-67,70-73 
  update.ts        |   96.71 |    97.05 |     100 |   96.71 | 114-118           
  utils.ts         |   75.63 |    57.14 |     100 |   75.63 | ...30-134,136-140 
 ...les/mcp-server |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  example.ts       |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-60              
 ...amples/starter |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  example.ts       |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-64              
 src/commands/mcp  |   90.31 |    84.61 |   83.33 |   90.31 |                   
  add.ts           |    99.3 |    96.07 |     100 |    99.3 | 154-155           
  approve.ts       |   76.19 |     87.5 |   66.66 |   76.19 | ...,89-99,114-124 
  list.ts          |   93.15 |    84.84 |      80 |   93.15 | ...78-180,198-199 
  reconnect.ts     |   78.85 |    66.66 |   85.71 |   78.85 | 42-55,169-191     
  remove.ts        |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 21-25             
 ...ommands/review |   90.48 |     89.6 |    91.5 |   90.48 |                   
  agent-prompt.ts  |   94.85 |    92.85 |   97.91 |   94.85 | ...3227,3562-3642 
  base-tree.ts     |   77.02 |    80.76 |   77.77 |   77.02 | ...63-384,386-399 
  capture-local.ts |      70 |     90.9 |      75 |      70 | 112-116,163-194   
  ...k-coverage.ts |   50.71 |       35 |   66.66 |   50.71 | ...40-245,279-289 
  cleanup.ts       |   92.18 |    89.69 |    90.9 |   92.18 | ...1061,1063-1064 
  comment-body.ts  |   67.85 |    87.09 |   66.66 |   67.85 | ...30,157,159-164 
  ...ent-status.ts |   93.19 |    84.61 |   83.33 |   93.19 | 302,442,573-593   
  ...ose-review.ts |   96.99 |    93.51 |   98.41 |   96.99 | ...4992-5036,5251 
  cost-ledger.ts   |   94.58 |     94.4 |   81.25 |   94.58 | ...53-654,694-704 
  drive.ts         |   76.07 |    85.71 |   81.81 |   76.07 | ...90-492,497-499 
  extract-step.ts  |   91.36 |    90.62 |   88.88 |   91.36 | ...90-707,714-729 
  fetch-diff.ts    |   73.75 |      100 |   66.66 |   73.75 | 77-97             
  fetch-pr.ts      |   97.25 |    92.05 |     100 |   97.25 | ...1548,1705-1710 
  issue-context.ts |   88.15 |     93.1 |   85.71 |   88.15 | 249-276           
  load-rules.ts    |   26.41 |      100 |   16.66 |   26.41 | ...41-153,155-156 
  match-remote.ts  |   85.55 |     92.3 |   66.66 |   85.55 | 74-79,144-150     
  meta.ts          |   79.43 |    93.75 |   66.66 |   79.43 | 123-128,147-162   
  mock-provider.ts |   95.44 |    90.25 |   89.47 |   95.44 | 145,690-709       
  parse-args.ts    |   99.48 |    95.63 |     100 |   99.48 | 553,824,880       
  plan-diff.ts     |    68.1 |      100 |   66.66 |    68.1 | 162-205           
  pr-context.ts    |   95.85 |    87.83 |     100 |   95.85 | ...2147,2236-2252 
  presubmit.ts     |   91.94 |    90.05 |   91.66 |   91.94 | ...-842,1057-1088 
  ...ish-assets.ts |    81.3 |    82.22 |   85.71 |    81.3 | ...79-483,510-556 
  ...r-findings.ts |   90.74 |    83.75 |     100 |   90.74 | ...17-422,429-430 
  repo-context.ts  |   94.62 |    90.75 |     100 |   94.62 | ...66-467,482-487 
  ...ve-anchors.ts |   78.34 |    89.28 |      75 |   78.34 | ...83-188,200-217 
  run.ts           |   82.66 |    88.54 |   94.11 |   82.66 | ...19,635-689,703 
  save-artifact.ts |   93.09 |    90.75 |   94.11 |   93.09 | ...98-501,594-597 
  scratch-tree.ts  |   90.06 |     85.1 |    90.9 |   90.06 | ...51-454,656-674 
  script-lint.ts   |   81.27 |    79.38 |   88.88 |   81.27 | ...69-783,785-807 
  submit.ts        |   92.25 |    88.17 |   91.66 |   92.25 | ...1210,1238-1275 
  test-delta.ts    |    86.4 |       92 |      60 |    86.4 | 177-208,471-479   
  test-efficacy.ts |   85.62 |    81.26 |      96 |   85.62 | ...3120,3128-3148 
  test-plan.ts     |   91.36 |    91.35 |   89.47 |   91.36 | ...35-836,900-917 
 ...w/__fixtures__ |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...r-default.mjs |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...der-empty.mjs |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...der-named.mjs |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...nds/review/lib |   97.28 |    94.61 |   98.73 |   97.28 |                   
  agent-briefs.ts  |      99 |      100 |      50 |      99 | 757-758           
  ...t-identity.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  anchors.ts       |     100 |    96.42 |     100 |     100 | ...39,175,184,231 
  assets.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  audit-layers.ts  |   98.67 |    96.15 |     100 |   98.67 | 288-290           
  authorization.ts |   93.42 |    93.33 |     100 |   93.42 | ...61-367,558-559 
  budget.ts        |     100 |    97.95 |     100 |     100 | 887,940           
  build-budget.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  certification.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  convergence.ts   |   99.37 |    96.52 |   88.88 |   99.37 | 559,777           
  coverage.ts      |   98.71 |    94.77 |     100 |   98.71 | ...1103,1648-1649 
  deadline.ts      |   98.03 |    91.73 |     100 |   98.03 | ...20,752,820,837 
  diff-flags.ts    |     100 |        0 |     100 |     100 | 75                
  diff-plan.ts     |   98.74 |    93.12 |     100 |   98.74 | ...48,271,297-298 
  disk.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  effort.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  failing-files.ts |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 41                
  gh.ts            |   89.09 |    95.38 |   77.77 |   89.09 | ...29,366-367,394 
  git.ts           |   96.77 |    93.93 |     100 |   96.77 | 234-235,272-273   
  heavy.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  import-graph.ts  |   96.68 |     95.4 |     100 |   96.68 | 180-182,211-212   
  ...ntal-scope.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  inline-counts.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...audit-gate.ts |     100 |     97.5 |     100 |     100 | 135               
  ledger.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  local-diff.ts    |   84.86 |    90.38 |     100 |   84.86 | ...63-473,475-483 
  ...ry-context.ts |   96.61 |    95.48 |     100 |   96.61 | ...47-450,496-499 
  md-field.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  merge-base.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  narrow-diff.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  npm-toolchain.ts |   98.23 |    95.29 |     100 |   98.23 | ...,819,1200,1217 
  path-rules.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  paths.ts         |   96.96 |       95 |     100 |   96.96 | 32-33             
  prompt-record.ts |   98.03 |    94.23 |     100 |   98.03 | 293-294,300       
  receipt.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  remote-match.ts  |   98.03 |    94.73 |     100 |   98.03 | 109-110           
  report.ts        |   92.85 |    86.66 |     100 |   92.85 | 204-205,207-211   
  ...ry-context.ts |     100 |    98.66 |     100 |     100 | 187               
  resume.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  retirement.ts    |     100 |    94.36 |     100 |     100 | ...58-559,760,917 
  review-footer.ts |   99.55 |    98.12 |     100 |   99.55 | 548-549           
  ...w-settings.ts |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 79                
  roster.ts        |     100 |    95.52 |     100 |     100 | 136,154,199       
  round-model.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  run-ledger.ts    |    98.2 |    93.87 |     100 |    98.2 | ...23,541,647,670 
  same-file.ts     |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 35                
  shell-quote.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  stale-bundle.ts  |   98.21 |    94.11 |     100 |   98.21 | 433,474,514-515   
  test-utils.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  toolchain.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  transcripts.ts   |   98.09 |    95.07 |     100 |   98.09 | ...92,438,707-708 
  ...pace-scope.ts |     100 |    96.96 |     100 |     100 | 186               
  workspaces.ts    |     100 |    96.85 |     100 |     100 | 222,452,499,512   
  ...ree-reader.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  worktree.ts      |   87.96 |    79.92 |     100 |   87.96 | ...1552-1553,1566 
 ...w/lib/platform |   90.17 |    84.71 |   95.91 |   90.17 |                   
  aone-client.ts   |   79.66 |       80 |     100 |   79.66 | ...31-132,165-197 
  aone.ts          |    90.3 |     85.5 |      92 |    90.3 | ...60,524-529,581 
  github.ts        |   96.05 |    75.67 |     100 |   96.05 | 26-29,213-214     
  registry.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...mands/sessions |   94.11 |    89.06 |   89.47 |   94.11 |                   
  common.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  list.ts          |   90.96 |    86.66 |   81.81 |   90.96 | 208-219,221-222   
  ps.ts            |     100 |    94.44 |     100 |     100 | 58                
 src/config        |   94.97 |    89.91 |   96.31 |   94.97 |                   
  ...l-fallback.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  auth.ts          |   89.35 |    83.56 |     100 |   89.35 | ...97-298,314-315 
  ...eMcpImport.ts |   87.91 |    81.52 |     100 |   87.91 | ...63-371,453-454 
  compile-cache.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |   89.17 |    88.78 |   83.78 |   89.17 | ...2512,2514-2522 
  ...cy-monitor.ts |      90 |    77.27 |     100 |      90 | ...72-73,90-92,98 
  ...ust-policy.ts |   83.02 |    88.88 |     100 |   83.02 | ...02-209,232-240 
  ...heme-names.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  environment.ts   |    96.5 |    93.51 |      95 |    96.5 | ...85-586,640-641 
  ...le-watcher.ts |   90.86 |    83.65 |   95.83 |   90.86 | ...23-325,370,418 
  ...resh-state.ts |   90.57 |    97.29 |   93.75 |   90.57 | 137-142,146-152   
  ...ime-reload.ts |     100 |    69.69 |     100 |     100 | ...12-113,122-123 
  hot-reload.ts    |     100 |    89.13 |     100 |     100 | 47,172-178,238    
  keyBindings.ts   |    97.4 |       50 |     100 |    97.4 | 240-243           
  ...ngsAdapter.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 64                
  ...ig-watcher.ts |   95.17 |    83.05 |     100 |   95.17 | ...78,200,292-293 
  ...er-secrets.ts |   98.97 |    96.96 |     100 |   98.97 | 85                
  mcpApprovals.ts  |   96.55 |    95.65 |     100 |   96.55 | 223-224,229-231   
  mcpJson.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcpServers.ts    |   92.85 |     87.5 |     100 |   92.85 | 46-47             
  ...idersScope.ts |      95 |    94.73 |     100 |      95 | 11-12             
  ...abledTools.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...comparison.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...n-settings.ts |   99.15 |    93.93 |     100 |   99.15 | 63                
  sandboxConfig.ts |   93.33 |    93.33 |     100 |   93.33 | ...42-147,216-217 
  session-id.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ings-cache.ts |   96.52 |    93.93 |     100 |   96.52 | 90-91,201-202     
  settings.ts      |   91.27 |    92.64 |      90 |   91.27 | ...1030,1032-1033 
  ...ingsSchema.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngsWatcher.ts |   95.54 |    88.34 |     100 |   95.54 | ...28,277-278,293 
  ...d-env-keys.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...l-settings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...paths-lite.ts |   89.47 |       88 |     100 |   89.47 | 43-44,53-54,56-57 
  ...precedence.ts |   98.79 |     92.3 |     100 |   98.79 | 62                
  ...tedFolders.ts |   92.53 |    93.54 |     100 |   92.53 | ...36-337,373-384 
 ...nfig/migration |   95.23 |    78.94 |   85.71 |   95.23 |                   
  index.ts         |   95.65 |     87.5 |     100 |   95.65 | 117-118           
  scheduler.ts     |   96.55 |       80 |     100 |   96.55 | 19-20             
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...ation/versions |   94.91 |      100 |     100 |   94.91 |                   
  ...-v2-shared.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  v1-to-v2.ts      |   81.75 |      100 |     100 |   81.75 | ...28-229,231-247 
  v2-to-v3.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  v3-to-v4.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  v5-to-v4.ts      |      96 |      100 |     100 |      96 | 94-95,99          
 src/core          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  auth.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  initializer.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  theme.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/dualOutput    |   75.08 |    67.64 |   71.42 |   75.08 |                   
  ...tputBridge.ts |   75.33 |    68.18 |   73.68 |   75.33 | ...09-410,418-421 
  ...utContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-8               
 src/export        |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-7               
 src/generated     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  git-commit.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/hooks         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...elete-hook.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/i18n          |   86.25 |    81.92 |   89.65 |   86.25 |                   
  index.ts         |   73.45 |    77.77 |      90 |   73.45 | ...70-271,294-299 
  languages.ts     |   93.07 |     92.3 |   85.71 |   93.07 | ...35,164-169,184 
  ...nslateKeys.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lationDict.ts |   93.33 |    66.66 |     100 |   93.33 | 15                
 src/i18n/locales  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ca.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  de.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  en.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  fr.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ja.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  pt.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ru.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zh-TW.js         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zh.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...nonInteractive |   80.98 |    77.27 |   84.12 |   80.98 |                   
  session.ts       |   84.97 |    76.31 |   96.07 |   84.97 | ...1048,1057-1067 
  types.ts         |    42.5 |      100 |   33.33 |    42.5 | ...31-632,635-636 
 ...active/control |   75.54 |    89.83 |      80 |   75.54 |                   
  ...rolContext.ts |    6.06 |        0 |       0 |    6.06 | 57-99             
  ...Dispatcher.ts |   91.95 |    92.98 |   88.88 |   91.95 | ...54-372,392,395 
  ...rolService.ts |    6.89 |        0 |       0 |    6.89 | 46-188            
 ...ol/controllers |   45.95 |    69.03 |   55.26 |   45.95 |                   
  ...Controller.ts |    42.4 |      100 |   83.33 |    42.4 | 101-105,140-223   
  ...Controller.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-56              
  ...Controller.ts |   55.01 |    67.14 |   58.33 |   55.01 | ...15-624,639-644 
  ...Controller.ts |   49.23 |       60 |      50 |   49.23 | ...07-108,111-121 
  ...Controller.ts |   40.64 |    68.11 |   46.66 |   40.64 | ...72-684,693-722 
 .../control/types |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  serviceAPIs.ts   |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...Interactive/io |   98.16 |    94.22 |   95.29 |   98.16 |                   
  ...putAdapter.ts |   98.02 |     93.3 |   98.07 |   98.02 | ...1433,1449-1450 
  ...putAdapter.ts |   96.22 |    91.66 |   85.71 |   96.22 | 52-53             
  ...nputReader.ts |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 67                
  ...putAdapter.ts |   98.51 |      100 |   90.47 |   98.51 | 90-91,131-132     
  ...projection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/patches       |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  is-in-ci.ts      |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-17              
 src/remoteInput   |   87.31 |    75.32 |   88.23 |   87.31 |                   
  ...utContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...putWatcher.ts |   88.01 |       76 |   93.33 |   88.01 | ...49-350,361-364 
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-8               
 src/runtime       |   99.61 |    95.07 |     100 |   99.61 |                   
  ...livery-ipc.ts |     100 |    91.17 |     100 |     100 | 94,106,134        
  ...l-delivery.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cpu-percent.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...erver-name.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-summaries.ts |   86.66 |       50 |     100 |   86.66 | 11,19             
  ...ber-errors.ts |     100 |    95.32 |     100 |     100 | 53,93-94,172,192  
  ...ls-mapping.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/serve         |   88.25 |    84.77 |   90.91 |   88.25 |                   
  ...tp-enabled.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-bridge.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  auth.ts          |   93.99 |    91.58 |     100 |   93.99 | ...29-430,433-435 
  ...em-adapter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  capabilities.ts  |     100 |    98.07 |     100 |     100 | 702               
  ...cp-command.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...horization.ts |   92.79 |    93.54 |    87.5 |   92.79 | 75-80,135-136     
  ...op-mcp-ipc.ts |   81.06 |    73.68 |   94.11 |   81.06 | ...37-242,267,289 
  ...nt-service.ts |    94.1 |    86.98 |     100 |    94.1 | ...75-477,484,486 
  ...-selection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ings-store.ts |   89.64 |    94.16 |   96.55 |   89.64 | ...57-269,521-524 
  ...ebhook-ipc.ts |    98.5 |     87.5 |     100 |    98.5 | 47                
  ...iagnostics.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...worker-env.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rker-group.ts |   87.27 |     85.2 |     100 |   87.27 | ...10,816-820,838 
  ...er-manager.ts |   89.39 |    83.88 |   93.33 |   89.39 | ...98,711,722-724 
  ...horization.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tartup-ipc.ts |   97.72 |    96.66 |     100 |   97.72 | 88-89             
  ...supervisor.ts |   92.54 |    84.53 |   97.14 |   92.54 | ...1489,1543-1547 
  ...e-grouping.ts |     100 |    94.28 |     100 |     100 | 71,137            
  core-runtime.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ub-session.ts |    90.9 |     78.6 |   94.73 |    90.9 | ...1001,1022-1027 
  ...tree-guard.ts |   92.89 |    87.55 |     100 |   92.89 | ...2766,2836-2840 
  daemon-logger.ts |   82.82 |    78.68 |   92.04 |   82.82 | ...1775,1802-1808 
  ...y-pressure.ts |     100 |    96.96 |     100 |     100 | 135               
  ...trics-ring.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...s-provider.ts |   68.04 |    52.77 |     100 |   68.04 | ...44-249,282-290 
  daemon-status.ts |   98.69 |    91.96 |     100 |   98.69 | ...1590,1592-1593 
  debug-mode.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  env-snapshot.ts  |   93.37 |    85.18 |     100 |   93.37 | 114-117,195-202   
  ...-scheduler.ts |   87.34 |    83.87 |     100 |   87.34 | 33-36,48-50,79-81 
  ...d-provider.ts |   92.06 |    87.09 |     100 |   92.06 | ...72,287-293,316 
  ...h-settings.ts |   94.94 |    90.41 |     100 |   94.94 | ...30,708,724,734 
  fast-path.ts     |   90.99 |    81.38 |   95.45 |   90.99 | ...33-542,608-609 
  ...ration-sse.ts |   42.55 |    33.33 |     100 |   42.55 | 23-24,30,33-56    
  health-query.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-149             
  ...e-observer.ts |   89.89 |    83.24 |      96 |   89.89 | ...11-512,541-543 
  ...back-binds.ts |     100 |    88.88 |     100 |     100 | 32                
  ...-workspace.ts |    90.9 |    85.71 |     100 |    90.9 | ...30-131,142-143 
  ...iders-edit.ts |     100 |    82.14 |     100 |     100 | 58-60,65,81       
  ...ory-picker.ts |     100 |    86.95 |     100 |     100 | 36,66,92          
  ...sion-audit.ts |     100 |      100 |   93.33 |     100 |                   
  ...nal-ledger.ts |    94.9 |     85.1 |     100 |    94.9 | ...81,302,361-362 
  rate-limit.ts    |   92.68 |    88.29 |     100 |   92.68 | ...89-291,303-305 
  ...qwen-serve.ts |   84.08 |    80.94 |   75.98 |   84.08 | ...7966,7984-7988 
  ...tup-errors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-keepalive.ts |   94.27 |    88.18 |     100 |   94.27 | ...34,538-539,578 
  ...-lifecycle.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-lifecycle.ts |   89.16 |    90.29 |   86.95 |   89.16 | ...24-325,330-334 
  server.ts        |   91.16 |     90.6 |   72.03 |   91.16 | ...2973,3003-3004 
  ...-admission.ts |   99.13 |    95.94 |     100 |   99.13 | 308-309           
  ...on-helpers.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-redaction.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t-event-id.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 12                
  ...-admission.ts |   98.71 |    89.65 |     100 |   98.71 | 68                
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-limits.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t-sessions.ts |   93.72 |    77.93 |     100 |   93.72 | ...51,854,867-869 
  ...l-resolver.ts |   90.32 |    66.66 |     100 |   90.32 | 16,45-46          
  ...ell-static.ts |   92.18 |    88.37 |     100 |   92.18 | ...21-224,267-270 
  ...ace-agents.ts |   66.13 |    70.57 |   92.68 |   66.13 | ...2246,2256-2266 
  ...generation.ts |    95.4 |    82.35 |   66.66 |    95.4 | 55-56,78,92       
  ...-git-state.ts |     100 |    91.93 |    90.9 |     100 | 161,172,202,265   
  ...ace-inputs.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ace-memory.ts |      83 |    74.54 |     100 |      83 | ...30-537,597-604 
  ...ers-status.ts |   98.58 |       79 |     100 |   98.58 | 106,134,174,177   
  ...tion-store.ts |   89.67 |    88.27 |   92.59 |   89.67 | ...91-400,411-414 
  ...e-registry.ts |   94.98 |    90.55 |     100 |   94.98 | ...67-568,575-576 
  ...e-remember.ts |   98.23 |    92.56 |     100 |   98.23 | ...36,340-345,386 
  ...te-runtime.ts |    89.4 |    90.47 |     100 |    89.4 | ...89-190,258-279 
  ...me-storage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...visibility.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...management.ts |   72.63 |    72.83 |   96.15 |   72.63 | ...88-889,896-900 
  ...lls-status.ts |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 152               
  ...reconciler.ts |   91.63 |    84.09 |     100 |   91.63 | ...71-273,306-307 
 ...serve/acp-http |   80.38 |    80.22 |    94.5 |   80.38 |                   
  ...r-registry.ts |   96.92 |    94.87 |     100 |   96.92 | 184-187           
  client-mcp-ws.ts |   54.85 |    58.62 |   72.72 |   54.85 | ...99-300,304-305 
  ...n-registry.ts |   93.03 |    84.13 |   98.52 |   93.03 | ...1624,1671-1682 
  dispatch.ts      |   75.61 |    77.24 |   93.33 |   75.61 | ...5538,5595-5601 
  index.ts         |   82.68 |    79.74 |   91.22 |   82.68 | ...2424,2510-2511 
  json-rpc.ts      |     100 |    96.96 |     100 |     100 | 92                
  ...ach-budget.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  safe-ws-send.ts  |   52.94 |    71.42 |     100 |   52.94 | 33-42,47-55       
  sse-stream.ts    |   98.26 |    88.75 |     100 |   98.26 | 87-88,117         
  ...ort-stream.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  ws-stream.ts     |   94.06 |    89.09 |     100 |   94.06 | 50,55,134,138-141 
 src/serve/auth    |   86.86 |     79.7 |   93.87 |   86.86 |                   
  device-flow.ts   |   96.35 |    80.57 |   97.61 |   96.35 | ...1358,1453,1519 
  ...w-provider.ts |   44.24 |    74.07 |   71.42 |   44.24 | ...23-284,297,301 
 ...rve/cdp-tunnel |   87.73 |    76.21 |    97.5 |   87.73 |                   
  ...r-emulator.ts |   93.27 |    77.77 |     100 |   93.27 | ...53-256,282-283 
  ...verse-link.ts |      88 |    76.19 |     100 |      88 | ...28-329,420-423 
  ...l-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cdp-ws.ts        |   76.28 |    61.29 |    87.5 |   76.28 | ...13-217,223-228 
 ...nel/acceptance |    6.12 |    57.89 |   46.15 |    6.12 |                   
  ...helpers.d.mts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  ...e-helpers.mjs |   97.64 |    70.96 |     100 |   97.64 | 22-23             
  ...mcp-smoke.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-124             
  ...cceptance.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-473             
  ...re-server.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-59              
  ...ols-smoke.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-268             
  real-tab.mjs     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-218             
  ...al-chrome.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-223             
 .../conversations |   91.33 |    87.66 |   95.58 |   91.33 |                   
  ...e-activity.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ime-errors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...me-manager.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-ownership.ts |   87.33 |    83.33 |   88.46 |   87.33 | ...57-558,601-602 
  ...-workspace.ts |    88.8 |    77.77 |     100 |    88.8 | ...81-282,329-330 
  ...ion-source.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/serve/fs      |   87.77 |    82.34 |     100 |   87.77 |                   
  audit.ts         |     100 |    96.29 |     100 |     100 | 211               
  errors.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...x-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  paths.ts         |   77.64 |    74.01 |     100 |   77.64 | ...65,594-598,611 
  policy.ts        |   90.52 |    89.18 |     100 |   90.52 | 172-180           
  text-cursor.ts   |   88.23 |       90 |     100 |   88.23 | 74-77,92-95       
  ...ile-system.ts |   88.02 |    81.85 |     100 |   88.02 | ...3027,3037-3038 
 src/serve/live    |   78.18 |    70.42 |   90.61 |   78.18 |                   
  ...en-context.ts |   95.74 |    82.35 |     100 |   95.74 | ...0,66-67,99-100 
  discovery.ts     |   85.89 |    82.01 |    91.3 |   85.89 | ...73-579,592-593 
  ...structions.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...oordinator.ts |   82.67 |    76.63 |   97.01 |   82.67 | ...1319,1351-1353 
  ...-installer.ts |    64.3 |    82.35 |   80.76 |    64.3 | ...45-446,460-472 
  ...oordinator.ts |   76.69 |    67.47 |   85.71 |   76.69 | ...1884,1975-1976 
  ...controller.ts |   67.82 |    79.66 |      75 |   67.82 | ...66-278,287-295 
  ...ak-to-user.ts |   96.66 |      100 |    87.5 |   96.66 | 37-38             
  ...sk-service.ts |   87.29 |    62.24 |   95.55 |   87.29 | ...1174,1176-1177 
  ...task-tools.ts |   98.97 |      100 |   88.88 |   98.97 | 201-202           
  ...redentials.ts |   96.26 |    93.47 |     100 |   96.26 | 91-94             
  ...me-session.ts |   65.63 |    57.24 |   88.88 |   65.63 | ...2270,2275-2282 
  ...up-context.ts |   94.85 |    77.39 |     100 |   94.85 | ...18,327-330,350 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 .../local-control |   82.89 |    86.13 |      90 |   82.89 |                   
  credentials.ts   |   96.42 |    95.45 |     100 |   96.42 | 109-110           
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...interfaces.ts |   43.58 |       75 |   42.85 |   43.58 | ...09-117,130-142 
  ...r-identity.ts |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 61                
  service.ts       |    93.4 |       90 |     100 |    93.4 | ...20-222,313-315 
 src/serve/routes  |   85.88 |    80.82 |   95.06 |   85.88 |                   
  a2ui-action.ts   |   96.84 |     88.5 |    87.5 |   96.84 | ...70-272,309-311 
  capabilities.ts  |   98.73 |    96.15 |     100 |   98.73 | 82                
  ...nel-notify.ts |   79.16 |    85.18 |     100 |   79.16 | ...03-104,120-126 
  ...l-webhooks.ts |   93.56 |    84.09 |     100 |   93.56 | ...42,292,332,334 
  daemon-status.ts |   85.71 |    83.33 |     100 |   85.71 | 101-108           
  goals.ts         |   98.94 |    91.17 |     100 |   98.94 | 143               
  health.ts        |   99.09 |    91.17 |     100 |   99.09 | 147               
  live-setup.ts    |   33.33 |     37.5 |      50 |   33.33 | ...18-123,130-135 
  live.ts          |   84.61 |    76.47 |     100 |   84.61 | ...04,106-111,131 
  permission.ts    |     100 |     92.3 |     100 |     100 | 50,98             
  ...uled-tasks.ts |   87.53 |    84.26 |   93.33 |   87.53 | ...1389,1432-1433 
  ...on-runtime.ts |   91.42 |       90 |     100 |   91.42 | 56-64             
  session.ts       |   86.46 |     82.1 |   92.52 |   86.46 | ...6719,6721-6722 
  sse-events.ts    |   86.85 |    85.64 |   94.11 |   86.85 | ...18-929,932,939 
  usage-stats.ts   |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 118               
  ...space-auth.ts |   85.55 |    75.64 |     100 |   85.55 | ...21-326,331,345 
  ...el-control.ts |   86.26 |    78.94 |     100 |   86.26 | ...17-318,339-347 
  ...management.ts |   90.35 |    78.94 |     100 |   90.35 | ...52-553,576-577 
  ...d-contacts.ts |   83.62 |    94.59 |     100 |   83.62 | 123,125-142       
  ...controller.ts |   83.33 |    80.47 |      90 |   83.33 | ...1056,1061,1068 
  ...extensions.ts |    88.8 |    77.83 |   93.84 |    88.8 | ...2329,2374-2375 
  ...-file-read.ts |      91 |    80.91 |     100 |      91 | ...20-621,624-625 
  ...file-write.ts |   89.72 |    79.35 |     100 |   89.72 | ...05,719-726,807 
  ...t-branches.ts |   75.43 |    66.66 |     100 |   75.43 | ...13-618,627-634 
  ...e-git-diff.ts |   97.32 |    90.56 |     100 |   97.32 | 161-162,189-191   
  ...ce-git-log.ts |     100 |    93.18 |     100 |     100 | 52,77,188         
  workspace-git.ts |   77.08 |    89.65 |     100 |   77.08 | 97-118            
  ...github-prs.ts |   88.26 |    63.46 |     100 |   88.26 | ...38-239,264-265 
  ...-lifecycle.ts |   95.23 |    75.75 |     100 |   95.23 | ...50-151,186-187 
  ...al-control.ts |   74.17 |    69.23 |     100 |   74.17 | ...18,220-226,231 
  ...management.ts |   87.47 |       85 |     100 |   87.47 | ...1733,1743-1748 
  ...cp-control.ts |    73.2 |    67.54 |   85.71 |    73.2 | ...27-633,644-645 
  ...ace-models.ts |   95.53 |    89.74 |     100 |   95.53 | ...52-157,296-297 
  ...ermissions.ts |    77.9 |    72.41 |     100 |    77.9 | ...69-277,298-316 
  ...e-settings.ts |   75.04 |    72.99 |     100 |   75.04 | ...79-690,696-697 
  ...tup-github.ts |   77.97 |    70.58 |   84.21 |   77.97 | ...46-352,397-398 
  ...ace-skills.ts |    76.9 |    87.15 |     100 |    76.9 | ...29-354,360-394 
  ...ace-status.ts |   82.94 |     74.5 |     100 |   82.94 | ...84-486,490-491 
  ...pace-tools.ts |   75.94 |    69.69 |   66.66 |   75.94 | ...59-164,193-194 
  ...pace-trust.ts |   76.92 |     67.1 |      80 |   76.92 | ...38-343,351-352 
  ...pace-voice.ts |   91.33 |    81.02 |     100 |   91.33 | ...70-673,676-678 
 src/serve/server  |   92.57 |    89.93 |   97.19 |   92.57 |                   
  access-log.ts    |   98.73 |    97.26 |     100 |   98.73 | 119,196           
  ...-timestamp.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...er-helpers.ts |   63.82 |    78.15 |   81.81 |   63.82 | ...16,330,332-347 
  ...w-registry.ts |    98.8 |    81.81 |     100 |    98.8 | 107               
  ...r-handlers.ts |   97.87 |       80 |     100 |   97.87 | 27                
  ...r-response.ts |   87.73 |    76.19 |     100 |   87.73 | ...97,814,877-886 
  fs-factory.ts    |     100 |    95.52 |     100 |     100 | 77,144,200        
  ...branch-ops.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...list-cache.ts |   99.01 |    95.52 |     100 |   99.01 | 184-185           
  ...t-deadline.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...iter-setup.ts |      65 |       80 |   33.33 |      65 | 30-35,38-43,47-48 
  ...st-helpers.ts |   95.13 |    95.09 |     100 |   95.13 | ...66-168,423-428 
  self-origin.ts   |   76.19 |       80 |     100 |   76.19 | 45-54             
  ...e-features.ts |      95 |     87.5 |     100 |      95 | 182-188           
  ...on-archive.ts |   90.22 |    86.52 |   97.43 |   90.22 | ...05,932,960-961 
  ...ion-export.ts |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 64                
  session-list.ts  |      97 |    93.45 |     100 |      97 | ...1068,1273-1277 
  ...ry-context.ts |    87.5 |       50 |     100 |    87.5 | 49-50             
  telemetry.ts     |   99.06 |    97.26 |     100 |   99.06 | ...04,873,952-954 
 src/serve/voice   |    92.7 |    91.53 |   97.72 |    92.7 |                   
  ...ice-config.ts |   84.81 |       30 |     100 |   84.81 | 91-100,104-105    
  voice-ws.ts      |   91.58 |    93.44 |      96 |   91.58 | ...68,483,521-523 
  ...oordinator.ts |     100 |    98.24 |     100 |     100 | 176               
 ...kspace-service |    90.9 |    88.03 |   91.66 |    90.9 |                   
  index.ts         |   90.41 |    87.29 |      90 |   90.41 | ...1505-1509,1512 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/services      |   92.69 |    89.57 |   98.13 |   92.69 |                   
  ...mandLoader.ts |     100 |    89.47 |     100 |     100 | 106-120           
  ...killLoader.ts |   97.19 |    85.71 |     100 |   97.19 | 142,153-154       
  ...andService.ts |   98.73 |      100 |     100 |   98.73 | 107               
  ...mandLoader.ts |   87.09 |    83.07 |     100 |   87.09 | ...35-340,345-350 
  ...omptLoader.ts |   79.55 |    88.42 |   85.71 |   79.55 | ...48,178,245-246 
  ...mandLoader.ts |   97.77 |     92.3 |     100 |   97.77 | 176,183-184       
  ...nd-factory.ts |   91.42 |    91.66 |     100 |   91.42 | 128,137-144       
  ...ation-tool.ts |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 125               
  ...ndMetadata.ts |   98.23 |    96.72 |     100 |   98.23 | 83,87             
  commandUtils.ts  |      96 |     90.9 |     100 |      96 | 48                
  ...and-parser.ts |   90.69 |    85.71 |     100 |   90.69 | 63-66             
  ...ionService.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  prompt-stash.ts  |   96.66 |    92.85 |     100 |   96.66 | 34-35             
  ...tree-lease.ts |   92.14 |    92.42 |     100 |   92.14 | ...91-296,329-330 
  ...low-loader.ts |     100 |    96.29 |     100 |     100 | 88                
  setup-github.ts  |    90.8 |    80.95 |     100 |    90.8 | ...49-450,457-458 
  ...-args-file.ts |   93.93 |    91.66 |    87.5 |   93.93 | 208-210,224-230   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-keyterms.ts |   98.64 |    95.77 |     100 |   98.64 | 116,142-143       
  voice-model.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  voice-service.ts |    90.4 |    87.87 |     100 |    90.4 | ...81,288,353-358 
  ...e-settings.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 19                
  ...ranscriber.ts |   91.77 |    87.11 |   97.22 |   91.77 | ...99-901,904-906 
 ...rvices/insight |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  dates.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ght/generators |   88.94 |    86.86 |   96.29 |   88.94 |                   
  DataProcessor.ts |   88.31 |    86.84 |      95 |   88.31 | ...1368,1372-1379 
  ...tGenerator.ts |   98.24 |    85.71 |     100 |   98.24 | 47                
  ...teRenderer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 .../insight/types |       0 |       50 |      50 |       0 |                   
  ...sightTypes.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...sightTypes.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...mpt-processors |   97.27 |    94.25 |     100 |   97.27 |                   
  ...tProcessor.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...eProcessor.ts |   94.52 |       85 |     100 |   94.52 | 46-47,93-94       
  ...tionParser.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lProcessor.ts |   97.41 |    95.83 |     100 |   97.41 | 96-99             
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/services/tips |   97.27 |    84.61 |     100 |   97.27 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tipHistory.ts    |   92.59 |       70 |     100 |   92.59 | ...24,146,153,162 
  tipRegistry.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tipScheduler.ts  |     100 |    91.66 |     100 |     100 | 55                
 src/startup       |   88.99 |    83.47 |    90.9 |   88.99 |                   
  ...p-prefetch.ts |   98.09 |    94.23 |    87.5 |   98.09 | 50,209,225-226    
  ...reeStartup.ts |   80.53 |     74.6 |     100 |   80.53 | ...94,403,409-412 
 src/test-utils    |   94.09 |    79.16 |   77.77 |   94.09 |                   
  ci-env.ts        |      88 |     62.5 |     100 |      88 | 22-23,28          
  ...omMatchers.ts |   69.69 |       50 |      50 |   69.69 | 32-35,37-39,45-47 
  ...mised-lock.ts |     100 |      100 |   66.66 |     100 |                   
  ...andContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  render.tsx       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui            |   74.57 |    75.47 |   68.47 |   74.57 |                   
  App.tsx          |   33.33 |       75 |   33.33 |   33.33 | 32-86             
  AppContainer.tsx |   76.06 |       72 |   69.44 |   76.06 | ...4292,4408-4414 
  ...tionNudge.tsx |    9.58 |      100 |       0 |    9.58 | 24-94             
  ...ackDialog.tsx |    30.3 |      100 |       0 |    30.3 | 26-76             
  ...tionNudge.tsx |    7.69 |      100 |       0 |    7.69 | 25-103            
  colors.ts        |   63.63 |      100 |   41.17 |   63.63 | ...52,54-55,60-61 
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  keyMatchers.ts   |   95.91 |    97.14 |     100 |   95.91 | 25-26             
  ...tic-colors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ractiveUI.tsx |   71.42 |     74.5 |    62.5 |   71.42 | ...10,337,404-409 
  ...inePresets.ts |   96.27 |    83.87 |     100 |   96.27 | ...97,402,410-412 
  textConstants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/auth       |   58.76 |    66.66 |   51.06 |   58.76 |                   
  AuthDialog.tsx   |   59.01 |     42.1 |   16.66 |   59.01 | ...25,332-354,358 
  ...nProgress.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-64              
  ...etupSteps.tsx |   60.21 |    70.73 |   57.69 |   60.21 | ...90,794,803,806 
  useAuth.ts       |   94.83 |       75 |     100 |   94.83 | ...33-234,253-259 
  ...rSetupFlow.ts |   43.18 |    33.33 |      50 |   43.18 | ...78-399,416-459 
 src/ui/commands   |    84.2 |    83.81 |   90.25 |    84.2 |                   
  aboutCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...or-command.ts |     100 |    95.65 |     100 |     100 | 104,182           
  agentsCommand.ts |   83.78 |      100 |      60 |   83.78 | 30-32,42-44       
  ...odeCommand.ts |    93.1 |    95.23 |     100 |    93.1 | 77-82             
  arenaCommand.ts  |   63.89 |    65.71 |   65.21 |   63.89 | ...01-606,691-699 
  authCommand.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  branchCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  btwCommand.ts    |   94.32 |    77.41 |     100 |   94.32 | 35-36,114-119     
  bugCommand.ts    |     100 |    77.77 |     100 |     100 | 28,62             
  cdCommand.ts     |    92.3 |    82.75 |     100 |    92.3 | ...,94-99,178,187 
  clearCommand.ts  |    80.9 |    70.83 |     100 |    80.9 | ...28-129,137-146 
  ...essCommand.ts |   68.22 |    54.05 |      75 |   68.22 | ...97-198,212-215 
  ...astCommand.ts |   84.27 |       75 |     100 |   84.27 | ...,91-97,125-130 
  ...ig-command.ts |   93.12 |    88.42 |     100 |   93.12 | ...07-315,321-323 
  ...extCommand.ts |   75.05 |    74.39 |   84.61 |   75.05 | ...95-628,639-640 
  copyCommand.ts   |    98.7 |    96.29 |     100 |    98.7 | 66-67,172,272,323 
  ...or-command.ts |   85.95 |    80.55 |   88.88 |   85.95 | ...68-274,298-309 
  deleteCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  diffCommand.ts   |     100 |    87.87 |     100 |     100 | ...63,231-232,245 
  ...ryCommand.tsx |   90.56 |    87.83 |    90.9 |   90.56 | ...75-280,327-334 
  docsCommand.ts   |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 26                
  doctorCommand.ts |   70.16 |    84.61 |      95 |   70.16 | ...29-679,682-816 
  dreamCommand.ts  |   85.45 |    88.88 |     100 |   85.45 | 58-65             
  editorCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rt-command.ts |   80.48 |       75 |     100 |   80.48 | 49-54,69-72,93-98 
  effort-utils.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  exportCommand.ts |   98.25 |    91.02 |     100 |   98.25 | ...81,198-199,364 
  ...onsCommand.ts |   52.31 |    56.25 |   69.23 |   52.31 | ...09,277-329,390 
  forgetCommand.ts |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 59                
  forkCommand.ts   |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 96,147            
  goalCommand.ts   |     100 |    96.49 |     100 |     100 | 139,192           
  helpCommand.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...oryCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  hooksCommand.ts  |   81.25 |    65.71 |   85.71 |   81.25 | ...,86-93,131-132 
  ideCommand.ts    |   60.75 |    64.28 |   41.17 |   60.75 | ...05-306,310-324 
  ...figCommand.ts |   52.83 |    81.25 |      70 |   52.83 | ...74-319,321-330 
  initCommand.ts   |   91.86 |       80 |     100 |   91.86 | 48,83-88          
  ...ghtCommand.ts |   77.87 |    71.42 |     100 |   77.87 | ...44-245,250-272 
  ...ageCommand.ts |   94.44 |    90.14 |     100 |   94.44 | ...13-214,241-251 
  learn-command.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  lspCommand.ts    |     100 |    86.95 |     100 |     100 | 31,102-103        
  mcpCommand.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  memoryCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  modelCommand.ts  |   85.02 |    82.53 |     100 |   85.02 | ...1089,1123-1128 
  ...onsCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  planCommand.ts   |   78.82 |    76.92 |     100 |   78.82 | 30-35,51-56,68-73 
  quitCommand.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  recapCommand.ts  |   21.81 |      100 |      50 |   21.81 | 24-73             
  ...ns-command.ts |   98.83 |    81.81 |     100 |   98.83 | 100               
  ...berCommand.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 46                
  renameCommand.ts |    89.6 |       90 |     100 |    89.6 | ...72-176,212-219 
  ...oreCommand.ts |   90.96 |    86.04 |     100 |   90.96 | ...41-146,177-178 
  resumeCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  rewindCommand.ts |   81.25 |      100 |      50 |   81.25 | 20-22             
  ...ngsCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...hubCommand.ts |   89.47 |       75 |      80 |   89.47 | 54-59             
  skillsCommand.ts |   78.82 |    81.81 |     100 |   78.82 | 37-52,78,97       
  statsCommand.ts  |   90.65 |    76.73 |     100 |   90.65 | ...30-733,825-832 
  ...ineCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...aryCommand.ts |   73.04 |     82.3 |      90 |   73.04 | ...20-547,561-565 
  tasksCommand.ts  |   77.33 |    72.13 |     100 |   77.33 | ...46-150,173-178 
  ...tupCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  themeCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  toolsCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  trustCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...te-command.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 74,148            
  vimCommand.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  voice-command.ts |   93.63 |       88 |     100 |   93.63 | 36,98-103         
  ...owsCommand.ts |   93.06 |       85 |   66.66 |   93.06 | ...78-183,282-287 
 src/ui/components |   72.84 |    79.91 |   77.58 |   72.84 |                   
  AboutBox.tsx     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  AnsiOutput.tsx   |   65.57 |      100 |      50 |   65.57 | 69-90             
  ApiKeyInput.tsx  |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-97              
  AppHeader.tsx    |    88.7 |       75 |     100 |    88.7 | 36,38-43,45       
  ...odeDialog.tsx |   87.24 |    72.22 |   33.33 |   87.24 | ...85,233-238,245 
  AsciiArt.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Indicator.tsx |   95.65 |    66.66 |     100 |   95.65 | 27,52             
  ...TextInput.tsx |   88.65 |    90.41 |     100 |   88.65 | ...84-286,300-302 
  Composer.tsx     |   94.49 |    66.66 |     100 |   94.49 | ...-76,88,143,157 
  ...entPrompt.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ryDisplay.tsx |   75.89 |    62.06 |     100 |   75.89 | ...,88,93-108,113 
  ...geDisplay.tsx |   68.42 |    57.14 |     100 |   68.42 | 16-17,31-32,42-50 
  CronPill.tsx     |     100 |    93.75 |     100 |     100 | 19                
  ...ification.tsx |      84 |       60 |     100 |      84 | 23-24,40-42       
  ...gProfiler.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-36              
  ...ogManager.tsx |   11.28 |      100 |       0 |   11.28 | 71-598            
  DiffDialog.tsx   |    53.5 |     37.5 |   69.23 |    53.5 | ...32-737,747-760 
  ...ngsDialog.tsx |    8.44 |      100 |       0 |    8.44 | 37-195            
  EffortDialog.tsx |   97.36 |      100 |     100 |   97.36 | 55-56             
  ExitWarning.tsx  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...hProgress.tsx |    87.8 |    33.33 |     100 |    87.8 | 28-31,56          
  ...ustDialog.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  Footer.tsx       |   81.27 |    69.23 |      50 |   81.27 | ...06,245,267-272 
  ...ngSpinner.tsx |   68.42 |    85.71 |      50 |   68.42 | 35-52,73,80-81    
  GoalPill.tsx     |   93.51 |    81.81 |     100 |   93.51 | 37-38,106-109,123 
  Header.tsx       |   98.65 |    94.73 |     100 |   98.65 | 173,175           
  Help.tsx         |   98.33 |       90 |     100 |   98.33 | ...25,382,448-449 
  ...emDisplay.tsx |   79.69 |    67.61 |     100 |   79.69 | ...17,520,523-529 
  ...ngeDialog.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  InputPrompt.tsx  |   84.26 |    82.94 |      80 |   84.26 | ...2215,2236,2332 
  ...Shortcuts.tsx |     100 |       88 |     100 |     100 | 98,119            
  ...Indicator.tsx |   98.18 |    97.82 |     100 |   98.18 | 161-162           
  ...firmation.tsx |   91.42 |      100 |      50 |   91.42 | 26-31             
  MainContent.tsx  |   95.88 |    96.03 |   46.15 |   95.88 | ...20,523-527,530 
  MemoryDialog.tsx |   86.59 |    80.15 |     100 |   86.59 | ...34-435,485,553 
  ...geDisplay.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-41              
  ModelDialog.tsx  |   85.22 |    74.08 |     100 |   85.22 | ...1041,1097,1099 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |     100 |    97.22 |     100 |     100 | 270               
  ...fications.tsx |   16.66 |      100 |       0 |   16.66 | 14-56             
  ...onsDialog.tsx |    2.13 |      100 |       0 |    2.13 | 62-133,148-1004   
  ...ryDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...icePrompt.tsx |   92.64 |    85.71 |     100 |   92.64 | 102-106,134-139   
  PrepareLabel.tsx |   91.66 |    77.27 |     100 |   91.66 | 73-75,77-79,110   
  ...atePrompt.tsx |    8.57 |      100 |       0 |    8.57 | 24-55,58-134      
  ...geDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngDisplay.tsx |   21.42 |      100 |       0 |   21.42 | 13-39             
  ...hProgress.tsx |   85.25 |    88.46 |     100 |   85.25 | 121-147           
  ...dSelector.tsx |   92.79 |    82.65 |     100 |   92.79 | ...19-323,354-370 
  ...ionPicker.tsx |   83.66 |    72.13 |     100 |   83.66 | ...96,402,444-466 
  ...onPreview.tsx |   93.58 |    83.78 |     100 |   93.58 | ...,70-71,195-197 
  ...ryDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...putPrompt.tsx |   92.06 |    86.36 |   83.33 |   92.06 | ...,70-72,120-123 
  ...tedDialog.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngsDialog.tsx |   71.49 |    73.89 |   69.23 |   71.49 | ...1244,1250-1251 
  ...ionDialog.tsx |    92.3 |    96.15 |   33.33 |    92.3 | 60-63,68-75,164   
  ...putPrompt.tsx |    15.9 |      100 |       0 |    15.9 | 20-63             
  ...Indicator.tsx |   57.14 |      100 |       0 |   57.14 | 12-15             
  ...MoreLines.tsx |      28 |      100 |       0 |      28 | 18-40             
  ...iewDialog.tsx |   97.77 |    87.67 |     100 |   97.77 | ...97,305-307,324 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |   95.86 |       75 |     100 |   95.86 | 67-71             
  ...ionPicker.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-172             
  ...tivityTab.tsx |    3.94 |      100 |       0 |    3.94 | 27-275            
  StatsDialog.tsx  |    8.64 |      100 |       0 |    8.64 | ...76-111,130-322 
  StatsDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ciencyTab.tsx |    78.9 |    56.52 |     100 |    78.9 | ...26,213,262-288 
  ...atmapView.tsx |    8.98 |      100 |       0 |    8.98 | 20-107            
  ...essionTab.tsx |      80 |    66.66 |     100 |      80 | ...70-277,283-300 
  ...ineDialog.tsx |    93.9 |    86.88 |     100 |    93.9 | ...20,282,302-304 
  ...yTodoList.tsx |   96.36 |    88.23 |     100 |   96.36 | 138-141           
  ...nsDisplay.tsx |   95.62 |    87.09 |     100 |   95.62 | ...24-125,273-275 
  ...inalImage.tsx |     100 |    93.93 |     100 |     100 | 75,129            
  ThemeDialog.tsx  |   89.95 |    46.15 |      75 |   89.95 | ...71-173,243-245 
  Tips.tsx         |   93.54 |       75 |     100 |   93.54 | 39-40             
  TodoDisplay.tsx  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 31-32             
  TrustDialog.tsx  |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 72-87             
  ...ification.tsx |   36.36 |      100 |       0 |   36.36 | 15-22             
  ...Indicator.tsx |    92.5 |     87.5 |     100 |    92.5 | 50-53             
  ...ackDialog.tsx |    7.84 |      100 |       0 |    7.84 | 24-134            
  ...xitDialog.tsx |   80.36 |    43.47 |      60 |   80.36 | ...24-238,248-251 
  ...odeVisuals.ts |   97.22 |    85.71 |     100 |   97.22 | 25                
  ...s-helpers.tsx |   66.25 |    81.25 |      50 |   66.25 | 25-32,46-53,62-72 
 ...nts/agent-view |   58.69 |    70.24 |    62.5 |   58.69 |                   
  ...atContent.tsx |    9.09 |      100 |       0 |    9.09 | 54-275,281-283    
  ...tChatView.tsx |     100 |    81.81 |     100 |     100 | 82                
  ...tComposer.tsx |   69.48 |    33.33 |   66.66 |   69.48 | ...51,269,277-279 
  AgentFooter.tsx  |   15.38 |      100 |       0 |   15.38 | 28-65             
  AgentHeader.tsx  |   15.38 |      100 |       0 |   15.38 | 27-64             
  AgentTabBar.tsx  |    87.9 |    63.88 |     100 |    87.9 | ...88,110-118,136 
  ...oryAdapter.ts |     100 |    91.83 |     100 |     100 | 103,109-110,138   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-12              
 ...mponents/arena |   45.51 |    70.53 |   60.86 |   45.51 |                   
  ArenaCards.tsx   |   73.06 |    71.79 |   85.71 |   73.06 | ...83-185,321-326 
  ...ectDialog.tsx |   83.48 |    69.86 |   88.88 |   83.48 | ...88-392,409-410 
  ...artDialog.tsx |    9.77 |      100 |       0 |    9.77 | 27-166            
  ...tusDialog.tsx |    5.63 |      100 |       0 |    5.63 | 33-75,80-288      
  ...topDialog.tsx |    6.17 |      100 |       0 |    6.17 | 33-213            
 ...ackground-view |   85.34 |    84.91 |   92.98 |   85.34 |                   
  ...sksDialog.tsx |   81.87 |    82.77 |   85.71 |   81.87 | ...1853,1965-1971 
  ...TasksPill.tsx |   78.84 |    94.28 |     100 |   78.84 | 64,109-129        
  ...gentPanel.tsx |   97.08 |    86.31 |     100 |   97.08 | 132,442-446,520   
  agent-forest.ts  |    99.2 |    93.93 |     100 |    99.2 | 258               
  ...Visibility.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-overlay.tsx |    88.2 |    76.47 |     100 |    88.2 | ...36-138,140-142 
 ...nts/extensions |   84.32 |    76.78 |   83.33 |   84.32 |                   
  ...gerDialog.tsx |   82.15 |    76.08 |     100 |   82.15 | ...91-198,258,260 
  TabBar.tsx       |   97.29 |    88.88 |     100 |   97.29 | 33                
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-12              
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...tensions/steps |   46.26 |       85 |   58.82 |   46.26 |                   
  ...ctionStep.tsx |   95.12 |    92.85 |   85.71 |   95.12 | 84-86,89          
  ...etailStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-145             
  ...nListStep.tsx |   75.26 |    88.37 |   66.66 |   75.26 | ...53,174,203-209 
  ...electStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-83              
  ...nfirmStep.tsx |   16.32 |      100 |       0 |   16.32 | 28-74             
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-11              
 ...xtensions/tabs |   71.92 |    68.21 |   70.83 |   71.92 |                   
  DiscoverTab.tsx  |   68.22 |    67.66 |   55.55 |   68.22 | ...93,656-660,664 
  InstalledTab.tsx |   75.49 |    67.44 |   83.33 |   75.49 | ...77,782-783,820 
  SourcesTab.tsx   |   71.67 |    70.47 |   77.77 |   71.67 | ...28,547,621-633 
 ...tensions/views |    50.7 |    52.38 |   20.83 |    50.7 |                   
  ...tionsView.tsx |   73.75 |    56.36 |   66.66 |   73.75 | ...30,353,369-374 
  ...tionsView.tsx |   43.45 |    44.82 |    6.66 |   43.45 | ...98-405,408-420 
  ...etailView.tsx |    9.24 |      100 |       0 |    9.24 | 40-67,70-163      
 ...mponents/hooks |   87.11 |    81.37 |   91.89 |   87.11 |                   
  ...rListBody.tsx |   95.29 |    85.18 |     100 |   95.29 | 95-98             
  ...etailStep.tsx |   75.32 |    71.42 |      60 |   75.32 | ...56-169,173-186 
  ...etailStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rListStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entHeader.tsx |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 47                
  ...rListStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...etailStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...abledStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sListStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entDialog.tsx |   72.29 |    70.49 |     100 |   72.29 | ...51,563-568,572 
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-13              
  ...erGrouping.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sourceLabels.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...components/mcp |   40.91 |    63.44 |   70.58 |   40.91 |                   
  ...ealthPill.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entDialog.tsx |   32.09 |    26.19 |      40 |   32.09 | ...12,914,927-933 
  ...valDialog.tsx |   15.06 |      100 |       0 |   15.06 | 40-109            
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-35              
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  utils.ts         |      97 |       95 |     100 |      97 | 24,113-114        
 ...ents/mcp/steps |   53.94 |    73.51 |   57.14 |   53.94 |                   
  ...icateStep.tsx |    5.65 |      100 |       0 |    5.65 | 40-66,69-308      
  ...electStep.tsx |   10.95 |      100 |       0 |   10.95 | 16-88             
  ...etailStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...eListStep.tsx |   99.09 |    97.36 |     100 |   99.09 | 71                
  ...etailStep.tsx |   62.83 |       60 |   33.33 |   62.83 | ...87-296,307-332 
  ...rListStep.tsx |   88.53 |    81.25 |     100 |   88.53 | ...64,170,175-180 
  ...etailStep.tsx |    10.3 |      100 |       0 |    10.3 | ...1,67-79,82-140 
  ToolListStep.tsx |   69.29 |       50 |     100 |   69.29 | ...23,126,135-144 
 ...nents/messages |   90.35 |    86.92 |   85.71 |   90.35 |                   
  ...orMessage.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ionDialog.tsx |   89.23 |     84.9 |   81.81 |   89.23 | ...75,593,611-613 
  BtwMessage.tsx   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...upDisplay.tsx |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | ...43,289,402,432 
  ...onMessage.tsx |   92.06 |    82.35 |     100 |   92.06 | 58-60,62,64       
  ...nMessages.tsx |   94.11 |    95.91 |   76.92 |   94.11 | ...47-349,352-355 
  DiffRenderer.tsx |   93.17 |    86.02 |     100 |   93.17 | ...07,235-236,302 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |   97.08 |    77.77 |     100 |   97.08 | 95,97,106         
  ...usMessage.tsx |   81.73 |     65.9 |      75 |   81.73 | ...10-214,222,245 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |   95.52 |    88.31 |     100 |   95.52 | ...40,142,175-180 
  ...ssMessage.tsx |    12.5 |      100 |       0 |    12.5 | 18-59             
  ...edMessage.tsx |   21.05 |      100 |       0 |   21.05 | 23-39             
  ...sMessages.tsx |   59.04 |       50 |    37.5 |   59.04 | ...21-126,147-159 
  ...ryMessage.tsx |   13.63 |      100 |       0 |   13.63 | 23-64             
  ...onMessage.tsx |   91.87 |    82.63 |     100 |   91.87 | ...49-651,658-660 
  ...upMessage.tsx |   98.38 |    95.38 |     100 |   98.38 | 188-191,422       
  ToolMessage.tsx  |   93.06 |    86.32 |   93.75 |   93.06 | ...1037,1082-1084 
 ...ponents/shared |   86.29 |     82.4 |   94.17 |   86.29 |                   
  ...ctionList.tsx |     100 |      100 |      75 |     100 |                   
  ...tonSelect.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  EnumSelector.tsx |     100 |    96.42 |     100 |     100 | 58                
  ...rBoundary.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  MaxSizedBox.tsx  |   84.71 |    86.95 |      90 |   84.71 | ...67-568,685-686 
  MultiSelect.tsx  |   93.58 |       75 |     100 |   93.58 | ...43,199-201,211 
  ...tonSelect.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ontroller.tsx |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 73,93-95          
  ...eSelector.tsx |     100 |       60 |     100 |     100 | 40-45             
  ...lableList.tsx |   81.48 |    84.84 |     100 |   81.48 | 46-66,73-76       
  StaticRender.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  TextInput.tsx    |    80.8 |    67.24 |      80 |    80.8 | ...36-240,252-258 
  ...ontroller.tsx |     100 |    81.81 |     100 |     100 | 59-62             
  ...apsedTime.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Indicator.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lizedList.tsx |   91.49 |    86.66 |   83.33 |   91.49 | ...18-846,859,959 
  text-buffer.ts   |   85.98 |    81.81 |   97.91 |   85.98 | ...2664,2762-2763 
  ...er-actions.ts |   73.93 |    67.22 |     100 |   73.93 | ...32-733,934-936 
 ...ponents/skills |    3.96 |      100 |       0 |    3.96 |                   
  ...gerDialog.tsx |    3.96 |      100 |       0 |    3.96 | 79-137,140-681    
 ...ents/subagents |   30.87 |        0 |       0 |   30.87 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-11              
  reducers.tsx     |    12.1 |      100 |       0 |    12.1 | 33-190            
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  utils.ts         |   10.95 |      100 |       0 |   10.95 | ...1,56-57,60-102 
 ...bagents/create |    9.13 |      100 |       0 |    9.13 |                   
  ...ionWizard.tsx |    7.28 |      100 |       0 |    7.28 | 34-299            
  ...rSelector.tsx |   14.75 |      100 |       0 |   14.75 | 26-85             
  ...onSummary.tsx |    4.26 |      100 |       0 |    4.26 | 27-331            
  ...tionInput.tsx |    8.63 |      100 |       0 |    8.63 | 23-177            
  ...dSelector.tsx |   33.33 |      100 |       0 |   33.33 | 20-21,26-27,36-63 
  ...nSelector.tsx |    37.5 |      100 |       0 |    37.5 | 20-21,26-27,36-58 
  ...EntryStep.tsx |   12.76 |      100 |       0 |   12.76 | 34-78             
  ToolSelector.tsx |    4.16 |      100 |       0 |    4.16 | 31-253            
 ...bagents/manage |    21.6 |    59.52 |   27.27 |    21.6 |                   
  ...ctionStep.tsx |   10.25 |      100 |       0 |   10.25 | 21-103            
  ...eleteStep.tsx |   20.93 |      100 |       0 |   20.93 | 23-62             
  ...tEditStep.tsx |   25.53 |      100 |       0 |   25.53 | ...2,37-38,51-124 
  ...ctionStep.tsx |   35.61 |    59.52 |     100 |   35.61 | ...21-433,438-440 
  ...iewerStep.tsx |   13.72 |      100 |       0 |   13.72 | 18-73             
  ...gerDialog.tsx |    6.74 |      100 |       0 |    6.74 | 35-341            
 ...mponents/views |    70.1 |    72.89 |   61.11 |    70.1 |                   
  ContextUsage.tsx |   71.49 |    64.86 |      80 |   71.49 | ...30-436,473-567 
  DoctorReport.tsx |     9.8 |      100 |       0 |     9.8 | 25-54,57-131      
  ...sionsList.tsx |   88.05 |       75 |     100 |   88.05 | 70-77             
  McpStatus.tsx    |   92.01 |     73.8 |     100 |   92.01 | ...36,175-177,262 
  SkillsList.tsx   |   20.51 |      100 |       0 |   20.51 | 17-20,27-57       
  ToolsList.tsx    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/contexts   |   86.01 |    81.54 |   86.48 |   86.01 |                   
  ...ewContext.tsx |   87.56 |       80 |      75 |   87.56 | ...37-240,246-256 
  AppContext.tsx   |      80 |       50 |     100 |      80 | 19-20             
  ...ewContext.tsx |   93.83 |    68.51 |   42.85 |   93.83 | ...44,281-285,317 
  ...igContext.tsx |   81.81 |       50 |     100 |   81.81 | 15-16             
  ...ssContext.tsx |   85.65 |    84.85 |     100 |   85.65 | ...1612-1614,1620 
  ...owContext.tsx |   91.07 |    81.81 |     100 |   91.07 | 47-48,60-62       
  ...deContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |      50 |     100 |                   
  ...onContext.tsx |   80.77 |    79.56 |    92.3 |   80.77 | ...31-434,443-446 
  ...gsContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...usContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngContext.tsx |   71.42 |       50 |     100 |   71.42 | 17-20             
  ...utContext.tsx |   85.71 |      100 |   66.66 |   85.71 | 13-14             
  ...edContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |      50 |     100 |                   
  ...nsContext.tsx |   88.88 |       50 |     100 |   88.88 | 156-157           
  ...teContext.tsx |   86.66 |       50 |     100 |   86.66 | 235-236           
  ...deContext.tsx |      80 |     87.5 |      75 |      80 | ...11-112,118-120 
  ...rtContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/daemon     |   88.35 |    73.51 |   95.45 |   88.35 |                   
  ...ui-adapter.ts |   88.35 |    73.51 |   95.45 |   88.35 | ...74,792-793,879 
 src/ui/editors    |   93.33 |    85.71 |   66.66 |   93.33 |                   
  ...ngsManager.ts |   93.33 |    85.71 |   66.66 |   93.33 | 49,63-64          
 src/ui/hooks      |   85.97 |    83.91 |   87.81 |   85.97 |                   
  ...dProcessor.ts |   85.53 |    85.13 |     100 |   85.53 | ...-970,1017-1018 
  ...ention-ref.ts |   97.72 |       84 |     100 |   97.72 | 65                
  keyToAnsi.ts     |    3.92 |      100 |       0 |    3.92 | 19-77             
  ...esourceRef.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...completion.ts |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 95                
  ...ention-ref.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...dProcessor.ts |   94.62 |    73.58 |     100 |   94.62 | ...87-288,293-294 
  ...dProcessor.ts |   86.79 |    71.86 |   83.33 |   86.79 | ...1529,1558-1562 
  ...rt-command.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sced-flush.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ng-enabled.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...oice-input.ts |   92.36 |    81.95 |   66.66 |   92.36 | ...00,502-503,658 
  ...ke-repaint.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...amingState.ts |   12.22 |      100 |       0 |   12.22 | 54-157            
  ...agerDialog.ts |   88.23 |      100 |     100 |   88.23 | 20,24             
  ...dScrollbar.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ationFrame.ts |      42 |       75 |     100 |      42 | 42-44,53-59,62-87 
  ...odeCommand.ts |   58.82 |      100 |     100 |   58.82 | 28,33-48          
  ...enaCommand.ts |      85 |      100 |     100 |      85 | 23-24,29          
  ...aInProcess.ts |   27.92 |       80 |      25 |   27.92 | ...69-170,173-175 
  ...Completion.ts |   86.44 |    88.48 |     100 |   86.44 | ...14-515,525-541 
  ...ifications.ts |   87.82 |    96.77 |     100 |   87.82 | 138-152           
  ...tIndicator.ts |   88.28 |    81.57 |     100 |   88.28 | ...66,175,179-187 
  ...waySummary.ts |   96.26 |       75 |     100 |   96.26 | 126-128,170       
  ...ndTaskView.ts |   94.89 |    77.55 |     100 |   94.89 | 164-168,257,263   
  ...chedScroll.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ketedPaste.ts |    23.8 |      100 |       0 |    23.8 | 19-37             
  ...nchCommand.ts |   95.53 |    83.01 |     100 |   95.53 | ...64-165,289-292 
  ...ompletion.tsx |   97.09 |    87.23 |     100 |   97.09 | ...23-324,334-335 
  ...dMigration.ts |    92.1 |    88.88 |     100 |    92.1 | 42-44             
  useCompletion.ts |   96.29 |    90.56 |     100 |   96.29 | ...17-218,222-223 
  ...nitMessage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...extualTips.ts |   78.26 |       50 |     100 |   78.26 | ...2,75-79,96-104 
  ...eteCommand.ts |   89.52 |    90.69 |     100 |   89.52 | ...98-106,114-115 
  ...ialogClose.ts |   36.11 |       10 |     100 |   36.11 | ...89-195,202-207 
  useDiffData.ts   |   11.62 |      100 |       0 |   11.62 | 44-87             
  ...oublePress.ts |   53.12 |       75 |     100 |   53.12 | 33-35,41-54       
  ...orSettings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Completion.ts |   99.12 |    97.67 |     100 |   99.12 | 182-183           
  ...ionUpdates.ts |   93.72 |    92.98 |     100 |   93.72 | ...87-291,314-320 
  ...agerDialog.ts |   88.88 |      100 |     100 |   88.88 | 21,25             
  ...backDialog.ts |    63.9 |    76.47 |   66.66 |    63.9 | ...66-168,190-191 
  useFocus.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...olderTrust.ts |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 62                
  ...ggestions.tsx |   96.47 |    78.94 |     100 |   96.47 | 121,155-156       
  ...miniStream.ts |   87.41 |    84.11 |   78.26 |   87.41 | ...5812-5814,5816 
  ...BranchName.ts |     100 |    94.44 |     100 |     100 | 54                
  ...oryManager.ts |   98.38 |    98.85 |     100 |   98.38 | 141-144           
  ...ooksDialog.ts |    87.5 |      100 |     100 |    87.5 | 19,23             
  ...stListener.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nAuthError.ts |   76.19 |       50 |     100 |   76.19 | 39-40,43-45       
  ...putHistory.ts |   92.59 |    85.71 |     100 |   92.59 | 63-64,72,94-96    
  ...storyStore.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 69                
  useKeypress.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rdProtocol.ts |   36.36 |      100 |       0 |   36.36 | 24-31             
  ...unchEditor.ts |   22.58 |      100 |      50 |   22.58 | 11-32,44-85       
  ...gIndicator.ts |     100 |    96.66 |     100 |     100 | 109               
  useLogger.ts     |      16 |      100 |       0 |      16 | 15-45             
  useMCPHealth.ts  |   10.52 |      100 |       0 |   10.52 | 36-75             
  ...cpApproval.ts |   93.12 |    86.11 |     100 |   93.12 | ...24-127,139-140 
  useMcpDialog.ts  |    87.5 |      100 |     100 |    87.5 | 19,23             
  ...moryDialog.ts |    87.5 |      100 |     100 |    87.5 | 19,23             
  ...oryMonitor.ts |   83.14 |    78.57 |     100 |   83.14 | 54-63,74-79       
  ...ssageQueue.ts |     100 |     97.4 |     100 |     100 | 175,262           
  ...delCommand.ts |     100 |       96 |     100 |     100 | 61                
  ...ouseEvents.ts |   94.89 |       95 |   83.33 |   94.89 | 78-82             
  ...raseCycler.ts |   84.74 |    76.47 |     100 |   84.74 | ...49,52-53,69-71 
  ...rredEditor.ts |   58.33 |    22.22 |     100 |   58.33 | 23-27,29-33       
  ...derUpdates.ts |   85.29 |    80.28 |    92.3 |   85.29 | ...36,351-361,441 
  useQwenAuth.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lScheduler.ts |   89.13 |     86.9 |     100 |   89.13 | ...61-463,496-506 
  ...oryCommand.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-7               
  ...umeCommand.ts |    95.4 |    77.77 |     100 |    95.4 | 133-134,236-241   
  ...ompletion.tsx |   90.67 |    83.33 |     100 |   90.67 | ...02,105,138-141 
  ...ectionList.ts |   97.12 |    96.19 |     100 |   97.12 | ...92-193,247-250 
  ...sionPicker.ts |   92.87 |    90.35 |     100 |   92.87 | ...99-501,503-505 
  ...earchInput.ts |     100 |    97.29 |     100 |     100 | 82                
  ...ngsCommand.ts |   18.75 |      100 |       0 |   18.75 | 10-25             
  ...ellHistory.ts |   93.28 |    80.95 |     100 |   93.28 | ...96,153-154,164 
  ...oryCommand.ts |   85.48 |    58.33 |     100 |   85.48 | 22-28,40,71       
  ...agerDialog.ts |   88.23 |      100 |     100 |   88.23 | 20,24             
  ...Completion.ts |   82.79 |    85.33 |   94.73 |   82.79 | ...86-688,696-732 
  ...tateAndRef.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tatsDialog.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  useStatusLine.ts |   97.32 |    93.93 |     100 |   97.32 | ...18-422,518-525 
  ...eateDialog.ts |   88.23 |      100 |     100 |   88.23 | 14,18             
  ...mInProcess.ts |   27.35 |       80 |      25 |   27.35 | ...82-183,186-188 
  ...tification.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 50                
  ...alProgress.ts |   67.34 |    58.82 |   66.66 |   67.34 | 52-53,61-68,79-85 
  ...rminalSize.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...emeCommand.ts |    79.2 |    35.29 |     100 |    79.2 | ...15-116,120-121 
  useTimer.ts      |   97.59 |    94.73 |     100 |   97.59 | 17-18             
  ...lMigration.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...rustModify.ts |     100 |    90.47 |     100 |     100 | 112,134           
  useTurnDiffs.ts  |   95.12 |    78.57 |     100 |   95.12 | 133-134,156-157   
  ...elcomeBack.ts |   87.36 |     90.9 |     100 |   87.36 | ...,94-96,114-115 
  ...reeSession.ts |   93.75 |       70 |     100 |   93.75 | 47-48,72          
  vim.ts           |      74 |    67.56 |   69.23 |      74 | ...1854-1861,1869 
 src/ui/layouts    |   91.25 |    89.47 |     100 |   91.25 |                   
  ...AppLayout.tsx |   90.99 |     87.5 |     100 |   90.99 | 61-63,111-116,152 
  ...AppLayout.tsx |   91.66 |    92.85 |     100 |   91.66 | 75-80             
 src/ui/models     |   80.72 |       80 |   71.42 |   80.72 |                   
  ...ableModels.ts |   80.72 |       80 |   71.42 |   80.72 | ...,61-71,125-127 
 ...noninteractive |     100 |      100 |    6.66 |     100 |                   
  ...eractiveUi.ts |     100 |      100 |    6.66 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/selection  |   93.56 |    86.19 |     100 |   93.56 |                   
  screen-buffer.ts |   94.73 |    66.66 |     100 |   94.73 | 51-52             
  ...ion-coords.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ction-span.ts |   93.81 |     92.1 |     100 |   93.81 | ...1,45-46,99-100 
  ...tion-state.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ction-text.ts |   93.85 |    93.44 |     100 |   93.85 | 30-34,130-131     
  ...selection.tsx |   91.88 |    78.57 |     100 |   91.88 | ...16-417,446-447 
 src/ui/state      |      95 |    81.81 |     100 |      95 |                   
  extensions.ts    |      95 |    81.81 |     100 |      95 | 69-70,89          
 src/ui/themes     |    98.5 |    73.17 |     100 |    98.5 |                   
  ansi-light.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ansi.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  atom-one-dark.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ayu-light.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ayu.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  color-utils.ts   |   99.23 |    97.05 |     100 |   99.23 | 277-278           
  default-light.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  default.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...inal-theme.ts |   88.59 |    85.96 |     100 |   88.59 | ...57-261,266-270 
  dracula.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  github-dark.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  github-light.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  googlecode.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  no-color.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  qwen-dark.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  qwen-light.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tic-tokens.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-of-purple.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  theme-manager.ts |   88.68 |    84.52 |     100 |   88.68 | ...83-392,397-398 
  theme.ts         |     100 |    38.02 |     100 |     100 | ...34-449,457-461 
  xcode.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/utils      |   87.72 |    85.81 |   96.06 |   87.72 |                   
  ...Colorizer.tsx |   80.31 |    85.41 |     100 |   80.31 | ...00-201,313-339 
  ...nRenderer.tsx |   80.07 |     75.6 |     100 |   80.07 | ...70,274,332-333 
  ...wnDisplay.tsx |   92.87 |     93.5 |     100 |   92.87 | ...,955,1002-1020 
  ...idDiagram.tsx |   87.79 |    95.34 |     100 |   87.79 | 156-179           
  ...eRenderer.tsx |   93.63 |    81.77 |   95.23 |   93.63 | ...47-750,803-808 
  ...odeDisplay.ts |   94.28 |    85.71 |     100 |   94.28 | 23,40             
  asciiCharts.ts   |    96.7 |     87.5 |     100 |    96.7 | 170-177,278       
  ...dWorkUtils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...boardUtils.ts |    52.9 |    74.15 |    92.3 |    52.9 | ...29,632-641,644 
  commandUtils.ts  |   98.61 |    93.27 |     100 |   98.61 | 189,217-218,424   
  computeStats.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  customBanner.ts  |   90.68 |    91.22 |     100 |   90.68 | ...13,324-327,334 
  displayUtils.ts  |   73.84 |    73.91 |     100 |   73.84 | ...34,36-40,42-46 
  formatters.ts    |   94.87 |    98.21 |     100 |   94.87 | 116-119           
  goal-runtime.ts  |   91.42 |       95 |     100 |   91.42 | 32-34             
  gradientUtils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  highlight.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...gap-notice.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...oryMapping.ts |     100 |    95.65 |     100 |     100 | 45,151            
  historyUtils.ts  |   96.07 |     97.1 |     100 |   96.07 | 104-107           
  ...mage-parts.ts |   97.75 |    94.59 |     100 |   97.75 | 82-83             
  inline-math.ts   |   98.48 |    95.23 |     100 |   98.48 | 129-130           
  input-mouse.ts   |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 48,93             
  isNarrowWidth.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...olDetector.ts |   68.81 |       75 |   66.66 |   68.81 | ...27-132,160-161 
  latexRenderer.ts |   94.95 |     73.8 |     100 |   94.95 | ...76-178,184-187 
  layoutUtils.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  list-mouse.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ightLoader.ts |     100 |       95 |     100 |     100 | 81                
  ...nUtilities.ts |   98.72 |    94.36 |     100 |   98.72 | 145-146           
  ...t-position.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 85                
  ...geRenderer.ts |   86.51 |    70.16 |   95.12 |   86.51 | ...1286,1326-1332 
  ...alRenderer.ts |   86.69 |     71.9 |     100 |   86.69 | ...1476,1513-1519 
  ...lsBySource.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 84                
  mouse.ts         |   92.85 |    74.19 |     100 |   92.85 | ...38,145,149-152 
  osc8.ts          |   91.33 |    79.03 |     100 |   91.33 | ...73,273,277-278 
  ...red-height.ts |   98.38 |    97.14 |     100 |   98.38 | 195-197           
  ...mConstants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  restoreGoal.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...storyUtils.ts |   83.24 |    80.12 |     100 |   83.24 | ...02-624,755-756 
  ...ickerUtils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...evel-label.ts |   77.77 |    66.66 |     100 |   77.77 | 18,22-24          
  ...are-cursor.ts |   89.47 |    85.71 |     100 |   89.47 | 39-44             
  ...ataService.ts |   93.17 |     79.1 |     100 |   93.17 | ...14,227,254-256 
  suggestions.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...izedOutput.ts |   95.19 |      100 |   88.88 |   95.19 | 121-126           
  ...nal-buffer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-renderer.ts |   90.61 |    83.44 |     100 |   90.61 | ...80,482-484,607 
  ...ize-reflow.ts |     100 |     92.3 |     100 |     100 | 57,62,209,217,347 
  ...wOptimizer.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 33,76             
  terminalSetup.ts |    4.37 |      100 |       0 |    4.37 | 44-393            
  textUtils.ts     |   98.71 |    95.72 |     100 |   98.71 | 292-293,478-479   
  ...background.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  todoSnapshot.ts  |   90.42 |    92.85 |     100 |   90.42 | ...06-207,240-241 
  ...isplay-map.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  updateCheck.ts   |     100 |    92.75 |     100 |     100 | 227-239,331       
  windowTitle.ts   |   96.55 |    94.73 |     100 |   96.55 | 56-57             
  ...ow-keyword.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...i/utils/export |   75.03 |     60.1 |   94.59 |   75.03 |                   
  collect.ts       |   71.27 |    65.81 |      96 |   71.27 | ...90-633,655-656 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  normalize.ts     |   80.42 |    51.35 |     100 |   80.42 | ...59-364,376-378 
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  utils.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ort/formatters |   52.92 |    47.22 |   71.42 |   52.92 |                   
  html.ts          |   84.61 |       50 |     100 |   84.61 | ...53,57-58,62-63 
  json.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  jsonl.ts         |   82.45 |     37.5 |     100 |   82.45 | ...48,50-51,65-66 
  markdown.ts      |   36.32 |    47.05 |      50 |   36.32 | ...16-219,233-295 
 src/ui/voice      |   81.27 |    79.64 |   81.94 |   81.27 |                   
  ...d-recorder.ts |     6.2 |        0 |       0 |     6.2 | ...33-159,162-163 
  ...o-recorder.ts |   84.61 |    93.33 |   57.14 |   84.61 | ...16-117,131-136 
  ...me-session.ts |   91.09 |     92.1 |     100 |   91.09 | ...99,305,316-319 
  sox-recorder.ts  |    92.7 |    71.87 |     100 |    92.7 | ...34-135,153-154 
  ...ailability.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-keyterms.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  voice-model.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-recorder.ts |   88.29 |    67.74 |   81.81 |   88.29 | ...,98-99,112,115 
  voice-refine.ts  |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 92                
  ...ream-retry.ts |   86.79 |       70 |     100 |   86.79 | 16-18,48-49,59-60 
  ...am-session.ts |   88.02 |    66.66 |   84.61 |   88.02 | ...26,343-345,363 
  ...ranscriber.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/utils         |   83.17 |    87.81 |   93.19 |   83.17 |                   
  ...p-profiler.ts |   98.39 |    92.59 |     100 |   98.39 | 141,185,235       
  acpModelUtils.ts |   97.36 |    95.19 |     100 |   97.36 | ...09-210,214-215 
  apiPreconnect.ts |   96.74 |    94.59 |     100 |   96.74 | 167-170           
  ...ol-call-id.ts |   84.61 |       60 |     100 |   84.61 | 26-27,37-38       
  ...ng-failure.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  checks.ts        |   33.33 |      100 |       0 |   33.33 | 23-28             
  ...-api-error.ts |     100 |    96.42 |     100 |     100 | 14                
  cleanup.ts       |   84.05 |    94.11 |      80 |   84.05 | 80,111-121        
  commands.ts      |   97.45 |    96.66 |     100 |   97.45 | 153-155           
  ...y-identity.ts |   86.11 |    81.72 |     100 |   86.11 | ...70-371,378-379 
  ...Calculator.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cpuProfiler.ts   |   70.73 |    73.23 |   88.88 |   70.73 | ...27,430-431,438 
  deepMerge.ts     |     100 |    89.65 |     100 |     100 | 41-43,49          
  ...re-runtime.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ScopeUtils.ts |   97.56 |    88.88 |     100 |   97.56 | 67                
  doctorChecks.ts  |   70.31 |    74.57 |     100 |   70.31 | ...95-301,325-341 
  ...putCapture.ts |   90.65 |    86.31 |     100 |   90.65 | ...73,371,373-374 
  ...arResolver.ts |   97.14 |    96.55 |     100 |   97.14 | 125-126           
  errors.ts        |   97.56 |    94.64 |     100 |   97.56 | 69-70,304-305     
  events.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-mention.ts |   88.48 |     82.6 |     100 |   88.48 | ...56-160,164-168 
  findings.ts      |   96.02 |    92.15 |     100 |   96.02 | ...1249,1258-1259 
  gitUtils.ts      |   92.85 |    86.66 |     100 |   92.85 | ...13-116,164-167 
  ...AutoUpdate.ts |   93.54 |    94.64 |      90 |   93.54 | 126,131,202-213   
  ...tyWarnings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lationInfo.ts |   97.81 |    94.69 |     100 |   97.81 | ...03,420-421,466 
  ...projection.ts |   95.27 |    95.58 |     100 |   95.27 | 140-145           
  jsonc-editor.ts  |   93.18 |    92.66 |     100 |   93.18 | ...80-381,384-385 
  languageUtils.ts |   98.88 |    97.01 |     100 |   98.88 | 184-185           
  load-undici.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...npm-update.ts |   89.31 |    77.33 |     100 |   89.31 | ...87,303-304,344 
  math.ts          |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-15              
  ...er-mention.ts |     100 |    66.66 |     100 |     100 | 14,30,44-46       
  ...iagnostics.ts |   94.57 |    83.01 |   88.88 |   94.57 | ...05,311,315-317 
  ...serMessage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...onfigUtils.ts |   94.25 |    91.17 |     100 |   94.25 | ...30,436,439-443 
  ...iveHelpers.ts |   95.14 |    91.79 |     100 |   95.14 | ...54-455,553,566 
  osc.ts           |   97.18 |      100 |    87.5 |   97.18 | 182-183           
  package.ts       |   88.88 |    85.71 |     100 |   88.88 | 31-32             
  paths.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...uggestions.ts |   84.29 |    70.83 |     100 |   84.29 | 70-76,92-103      
  processUtils.ts  |    92.3 |       80 |     100 |    92.3 | 45-46             
  readStdin.ts     |   93.67 |    94.11 |   85.71 |   93.67 | 79-83             
  relaunch.ts      |   95.87 |    89.28 |     100 |   95.87 | 103-105,131       
  resolvePath.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  runBudget.ts     |   99.35 |    96.77 |     100 |   99.35 | 119               
  sandbox-path.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sandbox.ts       |   45.52 |    59.42 |   76.92 |   45.52 | ...1045,1057-1080 
  ...xImageName.ts |     100 |    77.77 |     100 |     100 | 10,18             
  sandboxMounts.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-path-argv.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sessionPaths.ts  |   90.84 |    90.56 |     100 |   90.84 | ...81-182,185-186 
  settingsUtils.ts |   79.62 |     88.8 |   85.18 |   79.62 | ...47-565,572-580 
  shell-args.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  spawnWrapper.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ate-verify.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...one-update.ts |   39.81 |    77.44 |   62.16 |   39.81 | ...1193,1196-1215 
  ...upProfiler.ts |   98.47 |    94.66 |     100 |   98.47 | 132-133,308       
  ...upWarnings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  stdioHelpers.ts  |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 23                
  systemInfo.ts    |   95.09 |    90.27 |     100 |   95.09 | ...54-255,260-264 
  ...InfoFields.ts |    87.5 |    65.85 |     100 |    87.5 | ...24-125,146-147 
  ...alSequence.ts |     100 |    97.61 |     100 |     100 | 60                
  ...iagnostics.ts |    95.8 |     87.5 |   93.75 |    95.8 | ...03,277-278,289 
  ...iffPreview.ts |   76.47 |       25 |     100 |   76.47 | 13,17,23-24       
  ...on-handler.ts |    73.8 |       75 |     100 |    73.8 | 17-18,25-26,67-73 
  ...e-relaunch.ts |   89.61 |    86.66 |      50 |   89.61 | 56-61,83-84       
  ...entEmitter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ansionHook.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...upWarnings.ts |   87.75 |       75 |     100 |   87.75 | 47-48,53-54,57-58 
  version.ts       |     100 |    66.66 |     100 |     100 | 11                
  ...ingHandler.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...WithBackup.ts |   65.04 |    77.77 |     100 |   65.04 | 97,112,133-172    
 ...s/housekeeping |   93.51 |    90.95 |   96.96 |   93.51 |                   
  cleanup.ts       |   92.59 |    93.75 |     100 |   92.59 | ...02-205,209-211 
  ...eractionAt.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  scheduler.ts     |      93 |    88.34 |      95 |      93 | ...57-359,411-415 
  throttledOnce.ts |   95.95 |    93.93 |     100 |   95.95 | 77-78,153-154     
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------

Core Package - Full Text Report

-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
File               | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | Uncovered Line #s 
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
All files          |   88.19 |    86.76 |    89.8 |   88.19 |                   
 src               |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/__mocks__/fs  |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  promises.ts      |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-48              
 src/agents        |   89.63 |    83.96 |   94.11 |   89.63 |                   
  ...transcript.ts |   88.49 |    84.09 |     100 |   88.49 | ...32,640,646-650 
  ...ent-resume.ts |   85.59 |    77.75 |   83.33 |   85.59 | ...1794-1798,1801 
  ...ound-tasks.ts |   94.63 |    90.13 |   96.38 |   94.63 | ...1773,1793-1796 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ent-result.ts |    96.8 |    92.68 |     100 |    96.8 | 106,129-131       
  ...n-registry.ts |   94.86 |    87.26 |    98.3 |   94.86 | ...1463,1477-1479 
  ...w-snapshot.ts |   75.73 |    72.22 |    87.5 |   75.73 | ...21,445,452-454 
  worktree-pin.ts  |     100 |    88.23 |     100 |     100 | 78,99             
 src/agents/arena  |   76.94 |    68.22 |   78.94 |   76.94 |                   
  ...gentClient.ts |   79.47 |    88.88 |   81.81 |   79.47 | ...68-183,189-204 
  ArenaManager.ts  |   75.89 |     65.2 |   78.57 |   75.89 | ...1887,1893-1894 
  arena-events.ts  |   64.44 |      100 |      50 |   64.44 | ...71-175,178-183 
  diff-summary.ts  |    87.5 |    72.34 |     100 |    87.5 | ...32-133,137-138 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...gents/backends |   78.09 |    85.23 |   76.28 |   78.09 |                   
  ITermBackend.ts  |   97.97 |    93.93 |     100 |   97.97 | ...78-180,255,307 
  ...essBackend.ts |    90.9 |    85.36 |   93.33 |    90.9 | ...70,672,674-675 
  TmuxBackend.ts   |    90.7 |    76.55 |   97.36 |    90.7 | ...87,697,743-747 
  detect.ts        |   31.25 |      100 |       0 |   31.25 | 34-88             
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  iterm-it2.ts     |     100 |     92.1 |     100 |     100 | 37-38,106         
  tmux-commands.ts |    6.64 |      100 |    3.03 |    6.64 | ...93-363,386-503 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...agents/runtime |   91.36 |    86.55 |   90.29 |   91.36 |                   
  agent-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  agent-core.ts    |   84.54 |    76.42 |   77.58 |   84.54 | ...2365,2411-2413 
  agent-events.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t-headless.ts |   93.49 |    89.41 |   83.33 |   93.49 | ...96-497,500-501 
  ...nteractive.ts |   81.01 |    82.35 |   76.66 |   81.01 | ...33,535-538,541 
  ...statistics.ts |   98.29 |    82.55 |     100 |   98.29 | 141,165,206,239   
  agent-types.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ool-policy.ts |   98.38 |      100 |    92.3 |   98.38 | 85-86             
  ...low-budget.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-scheduler.ts |   97.43 |    96.36 |     100 |   97.43 | 128-130           
  ...ow-journal.ts |   92.78 |    78.12 |     100 |   92.78 | ...49-150,192-194 
  ...chestrator.ts |   93.87 |    90.47 |   91.48 |   93.87 | ...2216,2309-2312 
  ...ow-prompts.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...low-runner.ts |   95.47 |    83.47 |   94.44 |   95.47 | ...44,312,332-335 
  ...ow-sandbox.ts |   96.88 |    91.16 |     100 |   96.88 | ...1768,1774-1775 
  ...flow-saved.ts |   96.51 |    94.36 |     100 |   96.51 | 134-135,234-237   
  ...flow-stall.ts |    97.9 |    83.33 |     100 |    97.9 | 138-139,236       
 src/agents/tasks  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/agents/team   |   82.97 |    84.58 |   89.28 |   82.97 |                   
  TeamManager.ts   |   74.33 |    81.09 |    80.7 |   74.33 | ...1707,1730-1731 
  identity.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sionBridge.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mailbox.ts       |   96.02 |    87.23 |     100 |   96.02 | 352-358           
  ...ptAddendum.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tasks.ts         |   89.29 |    83.08 |     100 |   89.29 | ...1000,1044-1045 
  team-events.ts   |   60.52 |      100 |      50 |   60.52 | ...40-144,151-155 
  teamHelpers.ts   |   91.71 |    94.54 |      95 |   91.71 | ...18-319,355-365 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...eam/test-utils |   95.06 |    95.16 |   98.21 |   95.06 |                   
  ...on-harness.ts |   96.49 |       85 |     100 |   96.49 | 128-129,141-142   
  fake-agent.ts    |     100 |    96.77 |     100 |     100 | 158,167           
  fake-backend.ts  |   86.46 |    97.61 |   95.83 |   86.46 | 124-146           
 src/config        |   84.33 |    86.96 |   75.77 |   84.33 |                   
  approval-mode.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...xtDefaults.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |   83.65 |    86.69 |   74.31 |   83.65 | ...8942,8946-8947 
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  models.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  storage.ts       |   94.39 |    91.57 |   88.23 |   94.39 | ...45-446,449-450 
 ...nfirmation-bus |   98.27 |    97.22 |     100 |   98.27 |                   
  message-bus.ts   |   98.14 |    97.14 |     100 |   98.14 | 42-43             
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/core          |   92.46 |    88.25 |   93.05 |   92.46 |                   
  baseLlmClient.ts |    88.4 |     83.8 |   81.81 |    88.4 | ...59,672,678-680 
  client.ts        |   92.58 |    88.04 |   91.01 |   92.58 | ...4310,4408-4409 
  ...tGenerator.ts |   86.34 |    87.34 |   84.61 |   86.34 | ...96-497,542-548 
  ...lScheduler.ts |    89.8 |    84.79 |   94.73 |    89.8 | ...6449,6477-6493 
  geminiChat.ts    |   94.91 |     90.1 |   95.72 |   94.91 | ...5208,5256-5257 
  geminiRequest.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  genai-compat.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...MediaLimit.ts |     100 |       96 |     100 |     100 | 96                
  ...htProtocol.ts |    9.09 |      100 |       0 |    9.09 | ...9,62-66,69-110 
  ...ream-error.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  logger.ts        |   87.41 |    87.02 |     100 |   87.41 | ...64-568,614-628 
  ...lay-buffer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...dispatcher.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tyDefaults.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...olExecutor.ts |   93.54 |    83.33 |      50 |   93.54 | 49-50             
  ...on-helpers.ts |   93.49 |    78.57 |     100 |   93.49 | ...10-211,228-229 
  ...issionFlow.ts |   98.97 |    96.96 |     100 |   98.97 | 107               
  ...try-policy.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ell-policy.ts |   94.89 |    88.54 |     100 |   94.89 | ...51-252,297-298 
  prompts.ts       |   93.64 |    91.42 |   83.33 |   93.64 | ...1209,1412-1413 
  ...ing-effort.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...n-recovery.ts |   95.13 |       80 |     100 |   95.13 | ...06-107,142-144 
  ...t-profiler.ts |    97.9 |    81.15 |   88.23 |    97.9 | 117,124-125,130   
  ...port-retry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tokenLimits.ts   |     100 |    91.89 |     100 |     100 | 87,122-139        
  ...reparation.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tion-guard.ts |   90.38 |    94.73 |     100 |   90.38 | 83-87             
  ...allIdUtils.ts |   98.81 |    91.22 |     100 |   98.81 | 43,52             
  ...okTriggers.ts |   99.45 |    92.43 |     100 |   99.45 | 182,193           
  ...terruption.ts |     100 |     92.3 |     100 |     100 | 86,104            
  turn.ts          |   99.19 |    94.48 |     100 |   99.19 | 698-699,768       
  ...l-fallback.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ntentGenerator |   96.33 |    88.12 |   96.15 |   96.33 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   97.24 |    86.72 |   94.87 |   97.24 | ...1436,1465,1476 
  converter.ts     |   96.19 |    89.25 |     100 |   96.19 | ...1329,1550-1552 
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-21              
  usage.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ntentGenerator |   88.78 |    72.36 |   89.47 |   88.78 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   87.18 |    71.83 |   88.88 |   87.18 | ...58-364,382-383 
  index.ts         |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 50                
 ...ntentGenerator |   96.12 |     91.3 |    90.9 |   96.12 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   96.06 |    90.75 |   90.47 |   96.06 | ...1309-1310,1338 
  ...tDetection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ntentGenerator |    91.9 |    90.55 |   95.79 |    91.9 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  converter.ts     |    91.3 |    89.49 |   96.87 |    91.3 | ...1942,2111-2126 
  errorHandler.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |   68.25 |    82.35 |      50 |   68.25 | 44-53,74-78,90-94 
  ...tGenerator.ts |    66.4 |    70.58 |   88.88 |    66.4 | ...51-157,168-169 
  pipeline.ts      |   95.27 |     90.9 |     100 |   95.27 | ...1434,1442,1541 
  ...ix-caching.ts |   95.23 |    92.85 |     100 |   95.23 | 45-46,69-70       
  ...ureContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ingOptions.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  ...CallParser.ts |   92.24 |     92.4 |     100 |   92.24 | ...28-529,549-552 
  ...kingParser.ts |     100 |    96.87 |     100 |     100 | 42                
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...rator/provider |   97.39 |    92.28 |    98.5 |   97.39 |                   
  dashscope.ts     |   98.36 |    95.08 |   96.42 |   98.36 | ...08-709,851-852 
  deepseek.ts      |   94.91 |    89.36 |     100 |   94.91 | ...31-132,145-146 
  default.ts       |   99.18 |    97.05 |     100 |   99.18 | 208               
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mimo.ts          |   94.11 |    66.66 |     100 |   94.11 | 29,52-53          
  minimax.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mistral.ts       |   96.07 |    73.33 |     100 |   96.07 | 32-33             
  modelscope.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  utils.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zai.ts           |   92.13 |    82.14 |     100 |   92.13 | ...,39-40,135-137 
 src/extension     |   88.48 |    85.65 |   93.22 |   88.48 |                   
  ...ive-safety.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-converter.ts |   80.55 |    73.66 |     100 |   80.55 | ...1133,1179-1180 
  corruptFile.ts   |     100 |       50 |     100 |     100 | 40-45             
  ...-converter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...redentials.ts |   95.33 |    89.47 |     100 |   95.33 | ...21-122,173-175 
  ...me-refresh.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sion-store.ts |   92.82 |    89.08 |    98.3 |   92.82 | ...1641-1647,1691 
  ...ionManager.ts |   84.45 |    83.47 |      83 |   84.45 | ...3126,3164-3165 
  ...references.ts |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | ...05,129,197,200 
  ...onSettings.ts |    92.3 |     94.4 |     100 |    92.3 | ...98-501,570-571 
  ...-converter.ts |    75.9 |    85.71 |   85.71 |    75.9 | ...98,202,214-248 
  github.ts        |   91.85 |    84.88 |     100 |   91.85 | ...1032-1033,1043 
  http-client.ts   |   84.61 |       80 |     100 |   84.61 | 20-21             
  i18n.ts          |   78.26 |       96 |      50 |   78.26 | 104-110,116-123   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  marketplace.ts   |   88.39 |    83.11 |     100 |   88.39 | ...08,494,507-508 
  ...ork-policy.ts |   89.72 |       90 |     100 |   89.72 | ...36,148-154,156 
  npm.ts           |   89.02 |    81.81 |     100 |   89.02 | ...86-688,695-700 
  override.ts      |   94.11 |    93.54 |     100 |   94.11 | 63-64,81-82       
  ...-converter.ts |   94.89 |    90.41 |     100 |   94.89 | ...50-151,222-224 
  redaction.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  settings.ts      |   66.26 |      100 |      50 |   66.26 | 81-107,141-146    
  ...ceRegistry.ts |   94.01 |    83.33 |     100 |   94.01 | ...38-344,365-366 
  storage.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ableSchema.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  variables.ts     |   88.95 |    84.21 |     100 |   88.95 | ...32-235,238-241 
  ...extraction.ts |   85.77 |       81 |   89.47 |   85.77 | ...02-205,260-261 
 ...ent-plugins-v1 |   84.94 |    79.51 |     100 |   84.94 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  manifest.ts      |   81.87 |    84.48 |     100 |   81.87 | ...55-156,161-174 
  mcp.ts           |   84.98 |    79.56 |     100 |   84.98 | ...88-389,419-420 
  paths.ts         |     100 |    94.44 |     100 |     100 | 59                
  skills.ts        |   82.31 |    63.88 |     100 |   82.31 | ...38-141,150-151 
 src/followup      |   84.58 |    81.04 |   86.84 |   84.58 |                   
  followupState.ts |   98.44 |    95.74 |     100 |   98.44 | 236-237           
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  overlayFs.ts     |   96.29 |    88.88 |     100 |   96.29 | 78,108,122        
  speculation.ts   |   75.98 |    67.22 |   58.33 |   75.98 | ...42-743,750-751 
  ...onToolGate.ts |   97.97 |     87.5 |     100 |   97.97 | 105,110           
  ...nGenerator.ts |   86.27 |    87.65 |     100 |   86.27 | ...42-247,359-361 
 src/generated     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  git-commit.ts    |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-10              
 src/goals         |   93.01 |    89.19 |   94.56 |   93.01 |                   
  ...eGoalStore.ts |   87.61 |    88.88 |   86.66 |   87.61 | ...85-188,196-204 
  ...t-verifier.ts |   96.27 |    91.17 |     100 |   96.27 | ...20,143-146,163 
  ...checkpoint.ts |   81.48 |    76.19 |     100 |   81.48 | ...02-105,115-118 
  goal-evidence.ts |   88.34 |    87.09 |   97.61 |   88.34 | ...1162,1185-1188 
  ...projection.ts |   66.66 |    72.97 |   33.33 |   66.66 | ...87,190,194-196 
  ...ersistence.ts |   87.29 |    85.96 |    87.5 |   87.29 | ...53-154,185-190 
  goal-protocol.ts |   96.87 |    95.65 |     100 |   96.87 | 207-208           
  goal-reducer.ts  |    95.2 |    92.59 |   97.29 |    95.2 | ...66,543,561-562 
  goal-runtime.ts  |   96.91 |       90 |   95.74 |   96.91 | ...1315-1316,1446 
  goal-tools.ts    |   98.38 |    94.17 |   95.83 |   98.38 | ...98-199,300-301 
  ...rn-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  goal-verifier.ts |   92.46 |    93.02 |     100 |   92.46 | ...69-172,185-187 
  goal-wire.ts     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-28              
  goalHook.ts      |   96.91 |    92.42 |     100 |   96.91 | 115-120,221-222   
  goalJudge.ts     |   95.84 |    87.09 |     100 |   95.84 | ...55-356,448-449 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/hooks         |   88.07 |    86.35 |   88.54 |   88.07 |                   
  ...okRegistry.ts |   86.48 |    77.08 |     100 |   86.48 | ...41-344,362-369 
  ...bortSignal.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  context-usage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...terpolator.ts |   96.66 |    93.33 |     100 |   96.66 | 66-67             
  ...HookRunner.ts |   96.68 |    87.23 |     100 |   96.68 | 110-112,231-233   
  ...Aggregator.ts |   96.57 |    91.48 |     100 |   96.57 | ...20-321,402,404 
  ...entHandler.ts |   95.57 |    84.76 |   94.73 |   95.57 | ...1040-1041,1051 
  hookPlanner.ts   |   87.55 |    85.54 |   86.66 |   87.55 | ...22-226,233-244 
  hookRegistry.ts  |   92.53 |    85.43 |     100 |   92.53 | ...39,458,462,466 
  hookRunner.ts    |   62.65 |    72.34 |   66.66 |   62.65 | ...70-771,780-781 
  hookSystem.ts    |   87.64 |     98.5 |   70.83 |   87.64 | ...58-759,765-766 
  ...HookRunner.ts |   79.06 |    66.66 |      80 |   79.06 | ...33-434,452-456 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...edCallback.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...HookRunner.ts |   94.19 |    84.37 |   81.81 |   94.19 | ...76-384,458-459 
  ...SkillHooks.ts |   78.75 |       75 |   66.66 |   78.75 | 62-66,137-152     
  ...oksManager.ts |   94.87 |    88.88 |     100 |   94.87 | ...84,325,327-329 
  ssrfGuard.ts     |   86.45 |    89.13 |     100 |   86.45 | ...85,289-295,301 
  stopHookCap.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  trustedHooks.ts  |      90 |    52.63 |     100 |      90 | ...53,66-67,97-98 
  types.ts         |   94.25 |    96.09 |   88.88 |   94.25 | ...46-547,632-636 
  urlValidator.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...it-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ide           |   76.98 |    85.03 |   79.03 |   76.98 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  detect-ide.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ide-client.ts    |   69.16 |    84.65 |   68.29 |   69.16 | ...1068,1097-1105 
  ide-installer.ts |   89.06 |    79.31 |     100 |   89.06 | ...36,143-147,160 
  ideContext.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  process-utils.ts |   84.84 |    71.79 |     100 |   84.84 | ...37,151,193-194 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/lsp           |   58.96 |    70.67 |   66.49 |   58.96 |                   
  ...nfigLoader.ts |   80.55 |    72.22 |   95.65 |   80.55 | ...02-504,508-514 
  ...ionFactory.ts |   42.81 |    73.07 |      50 |   42.81 | ...76-427,433-450 
  ...Normalizer.ts |   23.09 |    13.72 |   30.43 |   23.09 | ...04-905,909-924 
  ...verManager.ts |   75.73 |     80.1 |   79.66 |   75.73 | ...1346,1352-1382 
  ...eLspClient.ts |   32.78 |    81.81 |   21.05 |   32.78 | ...89-293,299-300 
  ...LspService.ts |      60 |    73.36 |   78.26 |      60 | ...1575,1635-1645 
  configHash.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/mcp           |    82.3 |    77.81 |   78.33 |    82.3 |                   
  configHash.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...h-provider.ts |   86.95 |      100 |   33.33 |   86.95 | ...,93,97,101-102 
  ...h-provider.ts |   79.31 |    58.06 |     100 |   79.31 | ...26-933,940-942 
  ...en-storage.ts |   98.78 |    97.95 |     100 |   98.78 | 106-107           
  oauth-utils.ts   |   73.61 |    85.48 |    92.3 |   73.61 | ...46-366,392-421 
  ...n-provider.ts |   89.83 |       96 |   45.45 |   89.83 | ...43,147,151-152 
 .../token-storage |   82.12 |    88.48 |   89.28 |   82.12 |                   
  ...en-storage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...en-storage.ts |   87.08 |    87.71 |   95.23 |   87.08 | ...00-201,214-215 
  ...en-storage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...en-storage.ts |   68.14 |    82.35 |   64.28 |   68.14 | ...81-295,298-314 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/memory        |   88.07 |     84.5 |   90.62 |   88.07 |                   
  ...y-document.ts |   89.52 |    84.61 |     100 |   89.52 | ...24-325,329-330 
  ...nel-memory.ts |   97.36 |    96.63 |   96.42 |   97.36 | ...91-293,367-368 
  const.ts         |   94.28 |     92.3 |     100 |   94.28 | 66-67             
  dream.ts         |    64.6 |    72.22 |      50 |    64.6 | ...04-109,124-165 
  ...entPlanner.ts |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 135,145           
  entries.ts       |   75.59 |    84.84 |   83.33 |   75.59 | ...56-157,172-180 
  extract.ts       |   92.41 |    79.41 |     100 |   92.41 | 56-61,100,119-122 
  ...entPlanner.ts |   91.55 |    76.74 |     100 |   91.55 | ...05,114-117,292 
  ...ionPlanner.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  forget.ts        |   81.83 |       75 |   83.33 |   81.83 | ...51,474,478-507 
  indexer.ts       |   94.14 |       84 |     100 |   94.14 | ...32-233,334,337 
  ...kill-agent.ts |   97.94 |    89.36 |     100 |   97.94 | 82-83,179-180     
  manager.ts       |    78.4 |    82.29 |   77.77 |    78.4 | ...1482,1495-1497 
  ...ent-config.ts |   86.99 |    82.69 |   86.36 |   86.99 | ...69,389,396-402 
  memoryAge.ts     |   90.47 |    83.33 |     100 |   90.47 | 50-51             
  paths.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ing-skills.ts |     100 |       72 |     100 |     100 | 31-35,73-78,97    
  prompt.ts        |   97.26 |    86.79 |     100 |   97.26 | ...10-218,222,225 
  recall.ts        |   86.86 |    86.36 |   92.85 |   86.86 | ...33-538,571-582 
  refresh.ts       |   93.58 |    89.58 |     100 |   93.58 | ...75-176,183-184 
  ...ceSelector.ts |    93.2 |    85.71 |     100 |    93.2 | ...45-146,148-149 
  remember.ts      |   98.88 |    90.19 |     100 |   98.88 | 50,70             
  scan.ts          |   93.75 |       80 |     100 |   93.75 | ...08-109,154,157 
  scopes.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...et-scanner.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entPlanner.ts |   76.89 |    74.07 |   72.22 |   76.89 | ...47-451,454,460 
  status.ts        |   10.52 |      100 |       0 |   10.52 | 41-98             
  store.ts         |   92.92 |    81.81 |     100 |   92.92 | ...16-117,147-148 
  ...git-status.ts |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 27                
  ...cret-guard.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...emory-sync.ts |   94.24 |    82.85 |     100 |   94.24 | ...34-236,246-247 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ontextFile.ts |   81.21 |     79.1 |   81.81 |   81.21 | ...63-277,291-296 
 src/mocks         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  msw.ts           |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-9               
 src/models        |   92.55 |    88.62 |   91.13 |   92.55 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tor-config.ts |   97.77 |    91.83 |     100 |   97.77 | 155,161,171       
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nfigErrors.ts |   74.22 |       44 |   84.61 |   74.22 | ...,67-74,106-117 
  ...igResolver.ts |   98.71 |    93.33 |     100 |   98.71 | 166,328,334       
  modelRegistry.ts |     100 |    98.11 |     100 |     100 | 177,261           
  modelsConfig.ts  |   89.36 |    86.93 |   88.09 |   89.36 | ...1404,1433-1434 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/output        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-formatter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/permissions   |   83.79 |    91.17 |   71.07 |   83.79 |                   
  autoMode.ts      |   97.66 |    93.13 |     100 |   97.66 | ...82-589,635,712 
  ...transcript.ts |      98 |       84 |     100 |      98 | 200-201           
  classifier.ts    |      94 |    94.54 |     100 |      94 | 158-165,389-393   
  ...erousRules.ts |     100 |    89.36 |     100 |     100 | 110,133,147,175   
  ...alTracking.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-commands.ts |   86.77 |     73.8 |     100 |   86.77 | 131-141,210-214   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-manager.ts |   86.63 |    89.01 |      80 |   86.63 | ...1111,1217-1221 
  rule-parser.ts   |   94.49 |     92.7 |     100 |   94.49 | ...1447,1481-1483 
  ...-semantics.ts |   70.44 |    91.09 |   46.66 |   70.44 | ...2237,2311-2314 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...sifier-prompts |   99.04 |    95.23 |     100 |   99.04 |                   
  system-prompt.ts |   99.04 |    95.23 |     100 |   99.04 | 220               
 src/prompts       |   83.63 |      100 |    87.5 |   83.63 |                   
  mcp-prompts.ts   |   18.18 |      100 |       0 |   18.18 | 11-19             
  ...t-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/providers     |   83.71 |     78.6 |   81.25 |   83.71 |                   
  all-providers.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  install.ts       |   93.11 |     84.5 |     100 |   93.11 | ...56-257,330-331 
  ...der-config.ts |   75.85 |    74.04 |   78.26 |   75.85 | ...73-474,502-503 
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...viders/presets |   97.85 |    91.66 |   63.63 |   97.85 |                   
  ...oding-plan.ts |   87.34 |      100 |       0 |   87.34 | 81-83,86-88,90-93 
  ...a-standard.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...token-plan.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...m-provider.ts |   97.05 |    81.25 |      75 |   97.05 | 118-119           
  deepseek.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  grok.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  idealab.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  minimax.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  modelscope.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  openrouter.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  requesty.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zai.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/qwen          |   85.41 |    78.88 |      96 |   85.41 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   98.64 |    98.18 |     100 |   98.64 | 105-106           
  qwenOAuth2.ts    |   82.79 |    73.91 |    90.9 |   82.79 | ...1205-1221,1251 
  ...kenManager.ts |   85.36 |     76.8 |     100 |   85.36 | ...52-757,778-783 
 src/resources     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/services      |   90.47 |     86.2 |   96.61 |   90.47 |                   
  ...ionTrailer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...llRegistry.ts |   98.48 |    87.28 |     100 |   98.48 | 81-82,105,474-475 
  branch-points.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | ...20,211,224,327 
  ...ionService.ts |    97.7 |    96.44 |     100 |    97.7 | ...1069,1212-1220 
  ...ingService.ts |   91.36 |    86.98 |   93.25 |   91.36 | ...2685,2700-2701 
  ...ttribution.ts |   91.73 |    87.71 |      90 |   91.73 | ...80-685,826-827 
  ...utSlimming.ts |    97.2 |    94.23 |     100 |    97.2 | ...39-340,378-381 
  cronScheduler.ts |   94.17 |    90.45 |      98 |   94.17 | ...1333,1736-1737 
  cronTasksFile.ts |   96.31 |    91.81 |     100 |   96.31 | ...11,336-337,483 
  cronTasksLock.ts |   94.44 |    89.47 |     100 |   94.44 | ...02-103,132-133 
  ...eryService.ts |   96.22 |    93.54 |      90 |   96.22 | 121,155-156,161   
  ...oryService.ts |   88.17 |    79.02 |    92.3 |   88.17 | ...1303,1344-1347 
  fileReadCache.ts |    97.5 |    96.07 |     100 |    97.5 | 349-350,363-364   
  ...temService.ts |    92.8 |    84.68 |   94.11 |    92.8 | ...53,479-486,531 
  ...ratedFiles.ts |      96 |    88.23 |     100 |      96 | 119-120,146-147   
  gitInit.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...reeService.ts |   74.75 |    70.76 |   96.07 |   74.75 | ...2296,2325-2326 
  ...on-service.ts |   87.38 |       72 |     100 |   87.38 | ...01-305,343-344 
  ...references.ts |   98.57 |    91.42 |     100 |   98.57 | 156-157,217-218   
  ...ionService.ts |   98.21 |    97.25 |     100 |   98.21 | ...81-682,729-730 
  ...ticsDumper.ts |   98.37 |    95.23 |     100 |   98.37 | 185-186           
  ...ureMonitor.ts |   95.82 |    90.52 |   97.05 |   95.82 | ...60,861,875-877 
  ...orRegistry.ts |   97.22 |    90.99 |     100 |   97.22 | ...55-456,609-610 
  ...ttachments.ts |   97.74 |     90.9 |     100 |   97.74 | 298-308,646       
  ...pi-history.ts |   98.94 |    88.88 |     100 |   98.94 | 43                
  ...ersistence.ts |   91.67 |    80.58 |     100 |   91.67 | ...1062-1063,1091 
  ...tory-state.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 31                
  ...on-service.ts |   94.49 |     92.3 |   97.22 |   94.49 | ...98-600,656-664 
  ...pr-service.ts |   96.22 |    89.13 |     100 |   96.22 | 90-93             
  ...ce-service.ts |    98.5 |    94.11 |    90.9 |    98.5 | 64-65             
  ...n-registry.ts |   98.73 |    96.29 |     100 |   98.73 | 584,638-639,692   
  ...ken-counts.ts |     100 |       96 |     100 |     100 | 58                
  ...ipt-reader.ts |   93.63 |    90.93 |    97.8 |   93.63 | ...2755-2756,2833 
  ...turn-state.ts |   94.11 |     90.9 |   91.66 |   94.11 | 108-112,129-130   
  ...est-helper.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-65              
  ...iter-lease.ts |   83.14 |    74.47 |   97.61 |   83.14 | ...2433,2445-2448 
  sessionRecap.ts  |   67.56 |    43.47 |     100 |   67.56 | ...60,178,180-183 
  ...ionService.ts |   89.61 |    86.97 |    93.4 |   89.61 | ...3013,3027-3047 
  sessionTitle.ts  |   95.75 |    77.41 |     100 |   95.75 | ...53-256,287-288 
  ...ionService.ts |   84.43 |    78.45 |   97.18 |   84.43 | ...2496,2502-2507 
  ...pInhibitor.ts |   97.42 |    92.77 |     100 |   97.42 | ...30,169,369-370 
  ...Estimation.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 118               
  ...ageService.ts |   97.76 |    91.59 |   93.75 |   97.76 | ...61-262,366,567 
  ...ite-origin.ts |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 32                
  ...UseSummary.ts |   94.63 |    88.46 |     100 |   94.63 | ...62-164,214-215 
  ...rd-service.ts |     100 |    88.37 |     100 |     100 | ...29,145-146,241 
  ...oryService.ts |   90.76 |    84.07 |     100 |   90.76 | ...10-513,565-566 
  ...reeCleanup.ts |   14.42 |      100 |   33.33 |   14.42 | 58-186            
  ...ionService.ts |   88.36 |     87.7 |     100 |   88.36 | ...48-449,465-466 
 ...icrocompaction |   98.91 |    95.08 |     100 |   98.91 |                   
  microcompact.ts  |   98.91 |    95.08 |     100 |   98.91 | ...60,769,778-779 
 ...s/visionBridge |   98.81 |    92.12 |     100 |   98.81 |                   
  ...capability.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...part-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-bridge.ts |   98.72 |    82.35 |     100 |   98.72 | 65,71             
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ge-service.ts |   98.61 |     94.7 |     100 |   98.61 | ...06,666,679-680 
 src/skills        |   89.29 |    85.94 |   93.68 |   89.29 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...activation.ts |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 93,112            
  skill-curator.ts |   89.71 |    81.54 |     100 |   89.71 | ...01-902,904-907 
  skill-load.ts    |   94.84 |    87.69 |     100 |   94.84 | ...03,223,235-237 
  skill-manager.ts |   84.82 |    85.29 |   83.33 |   84.82 | ...1243,1250-1254 
  skill-paths.ts   |   90.42 |     87.5 |     100 |   90.42 | ...19-120,125-126 
  symlinkScope.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |   97.91 |    98.07 |     100 |   97.91 | 277-278           
 ...ataviz/scripts |   80.06 |    95.23 |   88.23 |   80.06 |                   
  ...te_palette.js |   80.06 |    95.23 |   88.23 |   80.06 | 261-296,306-328   
 ...s/bundled/loop |   97.48 |    95.77 |     100 |   97.48 |                   
  ...omous-loop.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-task-file.ts |   94.85 |     92.4 |     100 |   94.85 | ...56,367,375-376 
  ...k-resolver.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/subagents     |   87.83 |    89.04 |   96.61 |   87.83 |                   
  ...ter-schema.ts |     100 |    98.07 |     100 |     100 | 99                
  ...tin-agents.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nt-manager.ts |   84.48 |    85.91 |   94.87 |   84.48 | ...1582,1659-1660 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  validation.ts    |   92.46 |    95.18 |     100 |   92.46 | 47-52,63-68,71-76 
 src/telemetry     |   82.52 |     84.8 |   85.71 |   82.52 |                   
  ...ty-tracker.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-metrics.ts |   99.08 |    80.95 |     100 |   99.08 | 185,199           
  ...on-tracing.ts |   80.71 |    81.91 |   79.16 |   80.71 | ...92,499-501,517 
  ...attributes.ts |   96.98 |    91.37 |     100 |   96.98 | ...47-348,366-367 
  ...ag-metrics.ts |     100 |    77.77 |     100 |     100 | 21,40             
  ...t-loop-lag.ts |   96.85 |    85.71 |     100 |   96.85 | 170-173           
  ...-exporters.ts |   65.38 |    83.33 |      50 |   65.38 | ...08-109,112-113 
  ...ai-content.ts |    74.5 |    66.41 |   91.66 |    74.5 | ...1480,1493-1502 
  ...i-provider.ts |     100 |       99 |     100 |     100 | 99                
  ...ai-request.ts |   87.52 |    92.79 |   83.78 |   87.52 | ...55-561,564-570 
  gen-ai-usage.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t.circular.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-111             
  ...-processor.ts |   99.12 |    96.03 |      95 |   99.12 | 150,379-380       
  ...t.circular.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-128             
  loggers.ts       |   60.73 |    78.01 |   66.66 |   60.73 | ...1507,1524-1544 
  metrics.ts       |   80.37 |    82.35 |   80.95 |   80.37 | ...1150,1153-1164 
  otlp-urls.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...attributes.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ime-config.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  sanitize.ts      |      80 |    83.33 |     100 |      80 | 35-36,41-42       
  ...rters-grpc.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rters-http.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sdk-impl.ts      |   93.95 |    86.44 |      75 |   93.95 | ...41,483-484,500 
  sdk.ts           |    82.7 |     90.9 |   66.66 |    82.7 | ...00-204,242-264 
  ...on-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-events.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-tracing.ts |   91.17 |    88.72 |    97.5 |   91.17 | ...1920,1949-1952 
  ...etry-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...l-decision.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  trace-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-id-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tracer.ts        |   98.56 |    88.63 |     100 |   98.56 | 52,101            
  types.ts         |   83.09 |     95.1 |   86.36 |   83.09 | ...1467,1471-1478 
  uiTelemetry.ts   |   97.18 |    93.93 |      88 |   97.18 | ...70,314,461-462 
 ...ry/qwen-logger |   74.23 |     80.7 |      70 |   74.23 |                   
  event-types.ts   |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  qwen-logger.ts   |   74.23 |    80.53 |   69.49 |   74.23 | ...1122,1160-1161 
 src/test-utils    |   96.38 |    98.64 |   84.09 |   96.38 |                   
  config.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...st-helpers.ts |   94.11 |       90 |     100 |   94.11 | 69-70             
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...mised-lock.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mock-tool.ts     |   94.85 |      100 |      80 |   94.85 | ...53,227-228,241 
  ...aceContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/tools         |   86.19 |    85.08 |   89.45 |   86.19 |                   
  ...erQuestion.ts |   89.71 |    81.13 |    92.3 |   89.71 | ...66-367,374-375 
  ...-registrar.ts |    77.7 |    66.66 |   66.66 |    77.7 | ...72-277,292-294 
  ...ub-session.ts |   89.72 |    91.48 |   83.33 |   89.72 | ...00-301,312-319 
  cron-create.ts   |   90.64 |     93.1 |      75 |   90.64 | ...,73-74,223-231 
  cron-delete.ts   |   97.56 |      100 |   85.71 |   97.56 | 31-32             
  cron-list.ts     |   98.23 |    95.45 |   88.88 |   98.23 | 57-58             
  diffOptions.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  display-image.ts |   87.42 |    85.71 |    90.9 |   87.42 | ...29-134,194-195 
  edit.ts          |   82.76 |    86.88 |   82.35 |   82.76 | ...45-746,865-915 
  ...r-worktree.ts |   83.14 |    68.42 |   88.88 |   83.14 | ...84-187,278-279 
  enterPlanMode.ts |      85 |       84 |      90 |      85 | ...28-133,161-175 
  exit-worktree.ts |   83.29 |     83.8 |   94.73 |   83.29 | ...14-515,537-538 
  exitPlanMode.ts  |      95 |    85.29 |     100 |      95 | ...21-325,344,378 
  ...permission.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  glob.ts          |   96.33 |     88.5 |     100 |   96.33 | ...24-225,373,376 
  grep.ts          |   90.73 |    86.71 |   86.36 |   90.73 | ...76-677,727-728 
  ...adTracking.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  image-gen.ts     |   91.66 |    78.12 |   91.66 |   91.66 | ...13-214,221-222 
  list-agents.ts   |   94.11 |    83.33 |   85.71 |   94.11 | 31-32,47-48       
  loop-wakeup.ts   |   99.27 |     93.1 |     100 |   99.27 | 45                
  ls.ts            |   96.74 |    90.54 |     100 |   96.74 | 176-181,212,216   
  lsp.ts           |   72.71 |     59.9 |    90.9 |   72.71 | ...1212,1214-1215 
  ...nt-manager.ts |   82.13 |    80.47 |   85.71 |   82.13 | ...3234,3236-3237 
  mcp-client.ts    |   80.03 |    86.58 |   89.47 |   80.03 | ...2272,2276-2279 
  ...ry-timeout.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcp-errors.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...pool-entry.ts |   79.21 |    85.71 |   81.57 |   79.21 | ...1341,1349-1350 
  ...ool-events.ts |       8 |      100 |       0 |       8 | 132-158           
  mcp-pool-key.ts  |   97.46 |    93.93 |     100 |   97.46 | 176-177           
  ...ce-content.ts |   96.55 |    91.17 |     100 |   96.55 | 80-82             
  mcp-retry.ts     |   97.67 |    95.65 |     100 |   97.67 | 131-132           
  ...ion-config.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcp-status.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcp-tool.ts      |   98.35 |    93.75 |     100 |   98.35 | ...-990,1045-1046 
  ...sport-pool.ts |   83.98 |     80.3 |   88.46 |   83.98 | ...1409,1416-1420 
  ...ace-budget.ts |   87.27 |     82.6 |     100 |   87.27 | ...00-305,340-345 
  memory-config.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...iable-tool.ts |     100 |    84.61 |     100 |     100 | 101,108           
  monitor.ts       |   91.82 |    83.09 |   88.46 |   91.82 | ...99,612,810-815 
  notebook-edit.ts |   85.71 |    77.39 |   82.35 |   85.71 | ...96-912,958-959 
  ...escendants.ts |   36.17 |    64.51 |   55.55 |   36.17 | ...46-310,385-390 
  ...nforcement.ts |   83.21 |    90.69 |     100 |   83.21 | 147-158,207-220   
  read-file.ts     |   95.49 |    88.61 |    87.5 |   95.49 | ...49,464,536-537 
  ...p-resource.ts |   96.85 |      100 |   91.66 |   96.85 | 92-96             
  ...d-artifact.ts |   85.68 |    81.59 |   94.73 |   85.68 | ...1071,1095-1096 
  ripGrep.ts       |    94.6 |    87.34 |   95.45 |    94.6 | ...33-734,740-741 
  ...-transport.ts |   71.42 |    55.55 |   71.42 |   71.42 | ...36-137,143-144 
  send-message.ts  |   81.13 |       90 |   66.66 |   81.13 | ...80-286,363-371 
  ...n-mcp-view.ts |   94.07 |    91.89 |    90.9 |   94.07 | 131-139           
  shell.ts         |   78.96 |    84.29 |      93 |   78.96 | ...5036,5111-5112 
  skill-utils.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  skill.ts         |   91.39 |    92.55 |      90 |   91.39 | ...84,488,534-556 
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...eticOutput.ts |   95.12 |      100 |      80 |   95.12 | 87-88             
  task-create.ts   |    94.4 |    93.75 |   83.33 |    94.4 | 45-49,63-64,95    
  task-list.ts     |   80.43 |    86.95 |   85.71 |   80.43 | ...67,121,125-132 
  task-stop.ts     |   93.14 |    96.29 |    87.5 |   93.14 | 39-40,54-64       
  task-update.ts   |   82.87 |     86.5 |   92.85 |   82.87 | ...54-564,588-599 
  team-create.ts   |   97.22 |    86.36 |   85.71 |   97.22 | 48-49,129-130     
  team-delete.ts   |   86.74 |    84.61 |   85.71 |   86.74 | 37-38,42-48,72-73 
  ...n-approval.ts |   92.14 |    96.96 |   81.81 |   92.14 | 38-39,42-43,93-99 
  todoWrite.ts     |   95.13 |    87.85 |   93.33 |   95.13 | ...23-527,540-545 
  tool-error.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tool-names.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tool-registry.ts |   78.57 |    79.86 |   83.33 |   78.57 | ...89-990,998-999 
  tool-search.ts   |   96.19 |    89.79 |   93.75 |   96.19 | ...09,259-264,426 
  tools.ts         |   93.11 |    92.75 |    92.3 |   93.11 | ...77-578,594-600 
  ...reapproved.ts |   99.27 |    94.11 |     100 |   99.27 | 170               
  web-fetch.ts     |   96.05 |    90.54 |   96.77 |   96.05 | ...85-786,800-801 
  web-search.ts    |   90.58 |    83.57 |      80 |   90.58 | ...1025,1083-1086 
  write-file.ts    |   87.06 |    85.71 |   89.47 |   87.06 | ...29-832,869-904 
  zoom-image.ts    |   95.76 |    93.93 |    90.9 |   95.76 | 54-59,203-204     
 src/tools/agent   |   86.97 |    87.71 |   88.49 |   86.97 |                   
  agent.ts         |   85.56 |    86.65 |   86.02 |   85.56 | ...4274,4308-4318 
  fork-profile.ts  |   93.65 |       90 |     100 |   93.65 | ...33-134,171-174 
  fork-subagent.ts |   98.73 |       95 |     100 |   98.73 | 101-102,173       
 ...tools/artifact |   95.78 |    92.51 |   88.63 |   95.78 |                   
  artifact-tool.ts |   91.46 |    88.46 |   71.42 |   91.46 | ...13-314,322-325 
  ...-publisher.ts |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 32                
  ...-publisher.ts |   96.74 |    97.72 |    87.5 |   96.74 | 29-30,156-157     
  html.ts          |     100 |    96.77 |     100 |     100 | 122               
  ...-publisher.ts |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 30                
  oss-publisher.ts |    98.1 |    91.48 |     100 |    98.1 | 43-45             
  publisher.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...s/computer-use |   90.21 |     82.3 |   78.66 |   90.21 |                   
  bootstrap.ts     |   59.42 |    80.95 |   41.66 |   59.42 | ...35-339,341-345 
  client.ts        |   80.11 |       90 |   77.77 |   80.11 | ...97,242-243,274 
  constants.ts     |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 129,256           
  downloader.ts    |   65.29 |    52.77 |   58.33 |   65.29 | ...99-300,316-355 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  install-state.ts |   94.44 |    72.72 |     100 |   94.44 | 44-45             
  ...n-detector.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 50                
  schemas.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tool.ts          |    96.3 |    86.11 |     100 |    96.3 | 75-76,184,252-258 
 ...tools/workflow |    86.9 |    85.36 |   78.94 |    86.9 |                   
  workflow.ts      |    86.9 |    85.36 |   78.94 |    86.9 | ...08,553,555-556 
 src/utils         |   93.07 |    89.79 |    96.8 |   93.07 |                   
  LruCache.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Controller.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ssageQueue.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...cFileWrite.ts |      95 |     92.7 |     100 |      95 | ...49-550,657-661 
  bareMode.ts      |   81.81 |      100 |      50 |   81.81 | 18-19             
  ...ry-content.ts |   98.45 |    95.45 |     100 |   98.45 | 132-133,159-160   
  browser.ts       |   86.84 |    78.94 |     100 |   86.84 | 34,36-37,65-66    
  btwUtils.ts      |   13.95 |      100 |       0 |   13.95 | 17-31,34-55       
  bundlePaths.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...igResolver.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...engthError.ts |   91.06 |    89.47 |     100 |   91.06 | ...46-147,154-155 
  ...n-branches.ts |   95.89 |    94.11 |      95 |   95.89 | ...99-500,512-525 
  ...tion-chain.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cronDisplay.ts   |     100 |    97.61 |     100 |     100 | 46                
  cronParser.ts    |   95.34 |    93.33 |     100 |   95.34 | 41-42,47-48,70-71 
  debugLogger.ts   |   96.66 |    96.61 |   88.88 |   96.66 | 192-196           
  editHelper.ts    |   93.63 |     83.9 |     100 |   93.63 | ...27-428,462-463 
  editor.ts        |   97.65 |    95.45 |     100 |   97.65 | ...35-336,338-339 
  encoding.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  env.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...arResolver.ts |   94.28 |    88.88 |     100 |   94.28 | 28-29,125-126     
  ...entContext.ts |   96.63 |    90.13 |   96.66 |   96.63 | ...42,444-445,512 
  errorParsing.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rReporting.ts |   95.65 |    93.33 |     100 |   95.65 | 37-38             
  errors.ts        |   88.92 |    93.03 |      68 |   88.92 | ...92,394,410-411 
  fetch.ts         |   90.68 |    82.63 |     100 |   90.68 | ...72,483-484,503 
  file-identity.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  fileUtils.ts     |   95.05 |    92.71 |   96.15 |   95.05 | ...1988,1996-1997 
  forkedAgent.ts   |   92.98 |    83.78 |   94.44 |   92.98 | ...77,685,690-697 
  formatters.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...eUtilities.ts |    92.4 |    86.95 |     100 |    92.4 | ...52-158,168-169 
  ...rStructure.ts |   94.39 |    94.28 |     100 |   94.39 | ...29-132,343-348 
  getPty.ts        |   31.57 |       50 |     100 |   31.57 | 26-38             
  git-branches.ts  |    91.6 |    84.21 |    92.3 |    91.6 | ...90,405-410,570 
  ...fig-safety.ts |   97.01 |       80 |     100 |   97.01 | 53-54             
  git-ignore.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  gitDiff.ts       |   95.19 |    81.36 |     100 |   95.19 | ...1073,1419-1420 
  gitDirect.ts     |   98.84 |    94.28 |     100 |   98.84 | 234,318           
  ...noreParser.ts |   94.48 |    93.22 |     100 |   94.48 | ...23-124,158-159 
  gitUtils.ts      |   78.83 |    82.35 |    87.5 |   78.83 | ...22-123,164-215 
  github-prs.ts    |   95.74 |    82.27 |     100 |   95.74 | 216,314-322       
  iconvHelper.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rePatterns.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  image-view.ts    |   95.08 |    93.47 |     100 |   95.08 | ...62-166,234-238 
  ...ionManager.ts |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 27                
  ...lPromptIds.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  jsonl-utils.ts   |   96.15 |    93.51 |     100 |   96.15 | ...86-387,429-432 
  ...-detection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...iconv-lite.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...simple-git.ts |   96.77 |    91.66 |     100 |   96.77 | 38                
  ...m-headless.ts |      96 |    88.88 |     100 |      96 | 34                
  ...iagnostics.ts |    96.4 |     94.2 |     100 |    96.4 | ...66,293-294,376 
  ...yDiscovery.ts |   93.42 |    90.72 |     100 |   93.42 | ...11,370,592-595 
  ...tProcessor.ts |   94.01 |    89.88 |     100 |   94.01 | ...47-353,445-446 
  ...Inspectors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  modelId.ts       |   98.96 |    98.18 |     100 |   98.96 | 153               
  ...kerChecker.ts |    90.9 |    91.66 |     100 |    90.9 | 73-79             
  notebook.ts      |   94.57 |    89.91 |   95.83 |   94.57 | ...21,333,385-387 
  openaiLogger.ts  |   91.66 |    89.74 |     100 |   91.66 | ...26-228,251-256 
  osc8.ts          |   54.26 |    64.86 |   83.33 |   54.26 | ...72-195,197-257 
  partUtils.ts     |     100 |    98.64 |     100 |     100 | 211               
  pathReader.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  paths.ts         |   90.88 |    90.66 |     100 |   90.88 | ...28-629,631-633 
  pdf.ts           |   92.17 |    85.81 |     100 |   92.17 | ...64-565,606-611 
  ...s-liveness.ts |     100 |    93.47 |     100 |     100 | 62,72,108         
  projectPath.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  projectRoot.ts   |   71.73 |    78.57 |     100 |   71.73 | 54-66             
  ...ectSummary.ts |   89.62 |    72.41 |     100 |   89.62 | ...40-145,196-199 
  ...tIdContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  proxyUtils.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rDetection.ts |   71.15 |       86 |     100 |   71.15 | ...-90,96-101,147 
  ...noreParser.ts |   92.63 |    91.66 |     100 |   92.63 | ...77-178,197-198 
  rateLimit.ts     |   93.75 |    89.62 |     100 |   93.75 | ...13,218-219,262 
  ...text-range.ts |   96.98 |    87.36 |     100 |   96.98 | ...87-688,763-764 
  readManyFiles.ts |   95.75 |    80.86 |     100 |   95.75 | ...05,558,568-572 
  retry.ts         |   96.09 |    92.52 |     100 |   96.09 | ...67,558-559,577 
  retryContext.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sification.ts |   97.63 |    97.08 |     100 |   97.63 | ...17,251-252,278 
  retryPolicy.ts   |   97.72 |    90.56 |     100 |   97.72 | 130-131           
  ripgrepUtils.ts  |   90.04 |    93.43 |   95.45 |   90.04 | ...55-565,598-599 
  ...sDiscovery.ts |   97.46 |    93.05 |     100 |   97.46 | ...04,182-183,202 
  ...iagnostics.ts |   83.08 |     67.5 |   92.59 |   83.08 | ...23,543-544,550 
  ...tchOptions.ts |   84.87 |    86.71 |   96.29 |   84.87 | ...71,696,725-734 
  ...odelPrefix.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  runtimeStatus.ts |   97.77 |    91.48 |     100 |   97.77 | 172-173           
  safe-mode.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  safeJsonParse.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nStringify.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-child-env.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...aConverter.ts |   98.03 |    97.75 |     100 |   98.03 | 100,102-103       
  ...aValidator.ts |   92.09 |    83.65 |   90.47 |   92.09 | ...60,882-883,896 
  ...r-launcher.ts |   96.35 |    93.97 |   85.71 |   96.35 | ...35-336,347-348 
  sedEditParser.ts |   91.78 |    92.18 |     100 |   91.78 | ...66-569,645-646 
  ...nIdContext.ts |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 95                
  ...orageUtils.ts |   96.21 |    85.21 |     100 |   96.21 | ...70,386,466,485 
  ...-pager-env.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...fety-rules.ts |     100 |     89.7 |     100 |     100 | ...01,304,309-311 
  shell-utils.ts   |   86.26 |    88.58 |     100 |   86.26 | ...2295,2302-2306 
  ...lAstParser.ts |    98.3 |    91.59 |     100 |    98.3 | ...1340-1342,1352 
  ...ContextEnv.ts |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 76,111            
  ...nlyChecker.ts |   96.33 |    96.57 |     100 |   96.33 | ...83-284,292-293 
  sideQuery.ts     |   86.82 |    86.66 |     100 |   86.82 | ...79-185,187-193 
  ...pEventSink.ts |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 61                
  ...tGenerator.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ameContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  symlink.ts       |   77.77 |       50 |     100 |   77.77 | 44,54-59          
  ...e-encoding.ts |   85.96 |    76.47 |     100 |   85.96 | 58-61,64-65,78-79 
  ...emEncoding.ts |   96.36 |    91.17 |     100 |   96.36 | 59-60,124-125     
  terminalSafe.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Serializer.ts |   98.72 |       90 |     100 |   98.72 | 42-43,134,201-203 
  testUtils.ts     |   53.33 |      100 |   33.33 |   53.33 | ...53,59-64,70-72 
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  textUtils.ts     |      65 |      100 |      75 |      65 | 56-75             
  thoughtUtils.ts  |     100 |    95.65 |     100 |     100 | 99                
  ...-converter.ts |   95.23 |    85.71 |     100 |   95.23 | 36-37             
  ...repeat-key.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...name-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-finalizer.ts |    98.1 |     92.3 |   93.33 |    98.1 | ...34-235,237-241 
  ...iagnostics.ts |   99.06 |     97.7 |   91.66 |   99.06 | 133-134,205       
  ...-retention.ts |     100 |    95.83 |     100 |     100 | 116               
  tool-utils.ts    |    95.2 |    93.61 |     100 |    95.2 | ...58-159,162-163 
  ...ultCleanup.ts |   54.62 |    60.86 |      75 |   54.62 | ...03-105,108-134 
  ...Compaction.ts |   96.13 |    96.39 |     100 |   96.13 | ...34-339,341-346 
  ...pt-records.ts |   87.58 |    86.23 |     100 |   87.58 | ...79-483,513-528 
  truncation.ts    |   90.61 |    90.35 |     100 |   90.61 | ...53-461,498-504 
  windowsPath.ts   |   89.47 |    79.31 |     100 |   89.47 | ...57-58,62,90-91 
  ...-directory.ts |    83.7 |    80.95 |    87.5 |    83.7 | ...37-238,252-253 
  ...ifact-path.ts |   94.11 |    92.85 |     100 |   94.11 | 32-33             
  ...aceContext.ts |   95.39 |    89.47 |     100 |   95.39 | ...16-317,321-322 
  xml.ts           |    97.8 |    87.69 |     100 |    97.8 | 98-99             
  yaml-parser.ts   |   83.87 |    77.27 |     100 |   83.87 | ...31-234,239-240 
 ...ils/filesearch |   83.94 |    80.75 |   94.78 |   83.94 |                   
  crawlCache.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  crawler.ts       |    82.9 |    76.81 |   95.08 |    82.9 | ...1563,1597-1598 
  fileSearch.ts    |   93.78 |    87.67 |     100 |   93.78 | ...71-272,274-275 
  fzfWorker.ts     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-109             
  ...rkerHandle.ts |   84.05 |    75.86 |      90 |   84.05 | ...30-334,340-341 
  ignore.ts        |     100 |    97.36 |     100 |     100 | 187               
  result-cache.ts  |     100 |    93.75 |     100 |     100 | 49                
 ...uest-tokenizer |   71.04 |    75.92 |   91.17 |   71.04 |                   
  ...eTokenizer.ts |   65.72 |    74.02 |    92.3 |   65.72 | ...65-466,479-533 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tTokenizer.ts |   68.39 |    69.49 |    90.9 |   68.39 | ...24-325,327-328 
  ...ageFormats.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  textTokenizer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------

For detailed HTML reports, please see the 'coverage-reports-22.x-ubuntu-latest' artifact from the main CI run.

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

LGTM, looks ready to ship — CI landed green after the review. ✅

[wenshao]

@qwen-code /takeover

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤝 Takeover engaged: the autofix loop now manages this PR — it will address new review feedback and resolve base conflicts until the label is removed or the round cap is reached. Remove the autofix/takeover label (or comment @qwen-code /takeover stop) to release.

中文说明

🤝 已接管：autofix 循环现在管理此 PR —— 将持续处理新的评审反馈与 base 冲突，直到移除标签或达到轮次上限。移除 autofix/takeover 标签（或评论 @qwen-code /takeover stop）即可释放。

[wenshao]

⚠️ Downgraded from Request changes to Comment: self-PR; CI still running. Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed. Suggestions are inline.

Not reviewed: build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally.

Not explored to full depth (tool budget reached): "agent reverse-audit (round 4)": none — everything in chunk 1 was examined; diff lines 350-1132 belong to other chunks by design, not to this walk.; "agent reverse-audit (round 5)": none — no check was cut short by the ceiling.; "agent reverse-audit (round 5)": none — nothing was cut short.; chunk 5: none — 18 tool calls used, all checks (string existence, helper source, test run, cross-paragraph consistency) completed..

Test Plan (not a blocker): src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory.

中文说明

⚠️ 已从请求修改降级为评论：self-PR; CI still running。 仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。 建议见行内评论。

未审查：build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally。

未探索到全部深度（达到工具调用预算）："agent reverse-audit (round 4)"：none — everything in chunk 1 was examined; diff lines 350-1132 belong to other chunks by design, not to this walk.；"agent reverse-audit (round 5)"：none — no check was cut short by the ceiling.；"agent reverse-audit (round 5)"：none — nothing was cut short.；chunk 5：none — 18 tool calls used, all checks (string existence, helper source, test run, cross-paragraph consistency) completed.。

Test Plan（非阻断）：src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[wenshao]

[Suggestion] The anonymous-recovery branch of persistRecoveredLedger (pr-context.ts, not touched by this PR) deliberately drops posted/prevPosted/sha/commitId as round-specific facts while advancing round, but the new churnRounds/fresh/induced fields ride through in ...kept — a streak survives the advance, and a measured-low reset can be discarded. Concretely: round N resets the streak (measured converging), an anonymous recovery at N+1 keeps the old streak while advancing the round counter, and round N+2 above the bar files "the 2nd consecutive round" — false, because the reset was lost. Bounded (filing still requires the current round's census above the bar), but it is one round of earliness or a lost reset beyond the documented "unmeasurable round carries" semantics.

Suggested change

	const churnRounds = round === 0 ? 0 : (streakOf(prev.churnRounds) ?? 0);
	Add churnRounds, fresh, induced to the destructured drop in the anonymous branch of persistRecoveredLedger (pr-context.ts ~line 1140), alongside posted/prevPosted — they are the same class of round-specific fact.

中文说明

persistRecoveredLedger 的匿名恢复分支（pr-context.ts，本 PR 未改动）在推进轮次计数时会刻意丢弃 posted/prevPosted/sha/commitId 这些「属于某一轮的事实」，但新增的 churnRounds/fresh/induced 会随 ...kept 一起保留——连续计数会穿越轮次推进存活，已测得收敛（清零）的轮次结果可能被丢弃。具体而言：第 N 轮测得收敛清零 streak，N+1 轮匿名恢复在推进轮次时保留了旧 streak，N+2 轮越过门槛后就会误报「连续第 2 轮」——而实际上清零已被丢弃。影响有界（上报仍要求本轮 census 越过门槛），但会提前一轮或丢失一次清零，超出文档所述的「未测量轮携带」语义。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[wenshao]

[Suggestion] The carried streak is trusted verbatim into the filed finding's ordinal, so the documented residual — "a forged streak can then buy a genuinely-churning pull request its finding one round early, and nothing else" — holds only for the block's timing, not for the "Nth consecutive round" history the finding asserts. A hand-edited marker or corrupted side file sets churnRounds to 10; the next round that is genuinely above the bar files "the 10th consecutive round" — an assertion of 10 rounds of churn history of which 9 never happened — on a PR that churned once. The census-in-hand gate bounds the false block, but the false ordinal (the finding's central factual claim, which a maintainer deciding whether to close the PR reads) is inflated up to 9,999 rounds. prevLedgerFacts could cross-check the carried streak against the side file's own fresh/induced pair; it reads neither.

Suggested change

	const churnRounds = round === 0 ? 0 : (streakOf(prev.churnRounds) ?? 0);
	In prevLedgerFacts, read the side file's fresh/induced through volumeOf, recompute aboveChurnBar on them, and zero a carried streak whose own round's census does not clear the bar (treating an absent census as carry); at minimum, correct the documented bound.

中文说明

被携带的连续计数被原样信任并写进阻塞 finding 的序数。文档所述的残余风险（「伪造的连续计数至多让确实在打转的 PR 提前一轮收到 finding，且仅此而已」）只覆盖阻塞的时机，不覆盖 finding 断言的历史：「连续第 N 轮」。手工篡改的 marker 或损坏的 side file 把 churnRounds 设为 10，下一轮只要自身越过门槛就会报「连续第 10 轮」——其中 9 轮从未发生。census 在手才上报的门槛限制了误报的阻塞，但错误的序数（维护者决定是否关闭 PR 时所读的核心事实）可被夸大至 9,999 轮。prevLedgerFacts 本可用 side file 自带的 fresh/induced 交叉校验连续计数，但它两者都不读。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Note: this round's parseLedger clamp (streak can never exceed the marker's own round) already bounds the ordinal-inflation arm — a forged streak can no longer post "the 10000th round". The prevLedgerFacts cross-check of a carried streak against the side file's own census remains open for the next round.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。注意：本轮的 parseLedger 钳制（streak 永不超过 marker 自身轮次）已限制序数夸大的一侧——伪造 streak 不再能发出「第 10000 轮」。prevLedgerFacts 用 side file 自身 census 交叉校验携带 streak 的部分留待下一轮。

[wenshao]

[Suggestion] The carry branch keys on churnCensus === null, collapsing two distinguishable states into one: input.convergence absent (the legitimate causes the field's docstring names) and input.convergence present but unreadable (induced > fresh, floats, strings — the shapes churnCensusOf's own docstring calls "a census that cannot be true"). An invalid present census rides the carry path like an unmeasured round, silently skipping the reset a measured round owes: a converging round whose model-written census is {fresh: 5, induced: 8} carries the standing streak instead of resetting it, and a single above-bar round later files a false "Nth consecutive round" REQUEST_CHANGES on a PR whose last legitimately-measured round had converged.

Suggested change

	const churnRounds = churnAbove
	Distinguish present-but-invalid from absent (e.g. a third sentinel from churnCensusOf, or check input.convergence !== undefined alongside the null return), and at minimum disclose the carried-over-invalid-census in the terminal report; or document that an unreadable census is treated exactly as absence.

中文说明

carry 分支以 churnCensus === null 为键，把两种可区分的状态混为一谈：convergence 缺失（字段文档列举的合法原因）与「存在但不可读」（induced > fresh、浮点、字符串——churnCensusOf 文档所称「不可能是真的 census」）。无效的现存 census 会像未测量轮一样走 carry 路径，悄悄跳过已测量轮应做的清零：一个测得收敛但模型把 census 写成 {fresh: 5, induced: 8} 的轮次会携带现有 streak 而非清零，随后一个越过门槛的轮次就会在一个「最后一个合法测量轮已收敛」的 PR 上误报「连续第 N 轮」REQUEST_CHANGES。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. The present-but-invalid vs absent distinction in the carry branch stays open; next round will decide between a third sentinel from churnCensusOf and reading input.convergence !== undefined beside the null return.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。carry 分支中「存在但无效」与「缺省」的区分仍开放；下一轮将在 churnCensusOf 的第三哨兵值与在 null 返回旁读取 input.convergence !== undefined 之间做出选择。

[wenshao]

[Suggestion] The reset branch fires on any valid census below the bar — including a census in the CHURN_MIN_FRESH band (fresh 1–3) that the bar's own minimum exists to refuse a verdict on. aboveChurnBar returns false on the min-fresh gate alone, and the caller routes a non-null below-bar census to the reset — so {fresh: 3, induced: 3} (100% fix-induced, the purest churn signal, and the classic slow-churn shape: one unwitnessed guard per round) zeroes a standing streak. A churning PR whose rounds alternate above-bar/small never accumulates churnRounds ≥ 2, so the deterministic non-convergence REQUEST_CHANGES never fires; a later above-bar round re-files "the 2nd consecutive round" with the fully-induced small round silently skipped. The blocker's own remedy ("split the change") makes rounds smaller — exactly the shape that lands in this band. No test pins the streak's fate in this band, and SKILL.md:1218's "the one input that silently retires" wording is inaccurate — a measured {3,3} retires the claim identically.

Suggested change

	const churnRounds = churnAbove
	Carry (not reset) when the census is valid but below CHURN_MIN_FRESH — the sample is too small to speak in either direction, exactly like an absent census — and disclose the floor in the Step 6 census doc.

中文说明

reset 分支对任何「低于门槛但合法」的 census 都会触发——包括处于 CHURN_MIN_FRESH 区间（fresh 1–3）的 census，而该最小值存在的意义正是拒绝对这种样本下结论。aboveChurnBar 仅因 min-fresh 门槛就返回 false，调用方把非 null 的低于门槛 census 送进 reset——于是 {fresh: 3, induced: 3}（100% 由修复引入，最纯粹的返工信号，也是典型慢速打转形态：每轮一个无测试的 guard）会清零现有 streak。打转 PR 的轮次若在「越过门槛/小轮」间交替，churnRounds 永远到不了 2，确定性的非收敛 REQUEST_CHANGES 永远不会触发；之后越过门槛的轮次会在静默跳过这个完全由修复引入的小轮后重报「连续第 2 轮」。该机制的补救建议（「拆分改动」）恰恰会让轮次变小——正好落入此区间。没有任何测试钉住该区间内 streak 的去向，SKILL.md:1218「唯一会静默撤销」的措辞也不准确——测得 {3,3} 同样会撤销。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Carry-vs-reset in the CHURN_MIN_FRESH band is a streak-semantics change; it will be handled together with the SKILL.md "one input that silently retires" wording it names, so the doc and the behavior land as one change.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。CHURN_MIN_FRESH 区间内的 carry/reset 之择属于 streak 语义变更；将与其点名的 SKILL.md「唯一会静默撤销」措辞一并处理，使文档与行为作为同一变更落地。

[wenshao]

[Suggestion] The blocking finding's message states "the Nth consecutive round in which most of the review's new work was work the previous round created", but the bar that decides to file it (aboveChurnBar: census.induced * 2 >= census.fresh) passes at exactly half — and the function's own docstring says the claim "needs a majority to be worth making". At the even-fresh half boundary the blocker posts a premise that is factually false: a round with fresh: 10, induced: 5 and a carried streak ≥ 2 fires REQUEST_CHANGES and tells the author "most" when exactly half was — the stated justification for "split the change" is wrong at that boundary. Verified by probe: aboveChurnBar({fresh: 10, induced: 5}) = true and the emitted text says "most".

Suggested change

	churnCensus && churnRounds >= CHURN_STREAK_TO_FILE
	Make the bar a strict majority to match the message and docstring: return census.induced * 2 > census.fresh; (and update the test at compose-review.test.ts:9039). Or, if half-or-more is intended, soften the message to "half or more".

中文说明

阻塞 finding 的文案称「连续第 N 轮中，本轮新增工作的大部分是上一轮制造的」，但决定是否上报的门槛（aboveChurnBar：induced * 2 >= fresh）在恰好一半时就通过——而函数自身的文档声称该主张「需要多数才有价值」。在 fresh 为偶数的半数边界上，阻塞项会发布一个事实上为假的断言：fresh: 10, induced: 5 且携带 streak ≥ 2 的轮次会触发 REQUEST_CHANGES，告诉作者「大部分」，而实际恰好是一半——「拆分改动」的论证在该边界不成立。已用探针验证：aboveChurnBar({fresh: 10, induced: 5}) = true，且输出文案为「most」。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[wenshao]

[Suggestion] The census never defines how deferred findings count in fresh, and its two definitions disagree: Step 6's enumeration counts "the ones that took a new R<round>-<n> id, plus the fix-induced ones that took a previous id" — while a deferred finding takes a D<round>-<n> id by design, so it is in neither bucket — yet the compose-state contract defines the census as "how many findings first appeared this round", which includes them. Concretely: from round 6 the auto floor turns critical and defers every otherwise-postable high-confidence Suggestion; a churning PR whose new defects are suggestion-grade then yields a well-formed measured census of {"fresh": 0, "induced": 0} — read as "this round converged" — and the streak resets. The round that should have been the second consecutive above-the-bar round firing the blocking non-convergence Critical instead silently retires the standing claim, exactly on the tail rounds where the floor turned critical.

Suggested change

- `convergence` — this round's census from Step 6's fix-induced rule, as `{"fresh": N, "induced": M}`: how many findings first appeared this round, and how many of those the fix-induced rule attributed to a previous entry's fix (the ATTRIBUTED count, not the count of findings on newly pushed lines). Two integers, `induced <= fresh`; a malformed pair, a float, a negative, or a numerator larger than its denominator is read as no census at all. **Omit the field when the round could not measure it** — absence carries the churn streak forward, a measured low census resets it, and zeros written for an unmeasured round are the one input that silently retires a standing non-convergence claim. `compose-review` owns everything downstream: the bar (half or more of `fresh`, and at least 4 `fresh`), the streak it stamps into the marker as `churnRounds`, and the body Critical it files itself on the second consecutive round above the bar.

State explicitly that deferred findings count in fresh (and in induced when the fix-induced rule attributed them), or name that deferred churn is intended not to count and define the all-deferred round (e.g. omit the census — absence carries the streak, which is fail-safe).

中文说明

census 从未定义被延迟的 finding 如何计入 fresh，且它的两个定义互相矛盾：Step 6 的枚举只数「拿到新 R<round>-<n> id 的，加上拿到上一轮 id 的 fix-induced 条目」——而被延迟的 finding 按设计拿 D<round>-<n> id，两个桶都不属于——compose-state 契约却把 census 定义为「本轮首次出现的 finding 数」，其中包含它们。具体而言：从第 6 轮起 auto 门限解析为 critical，延迟一切本可发布的 Suggestion；新缺陷均为 Suggestion 级的打转 PR 因此得到一个结构完整的测得 census {"fresh": 0, "induced": 0}——被解读为「本轮已收敛」——streak 被清零。本该作为「连续第二个越过门槛的轮次」触发阻塞性非收敛 Critical 的轮次，反而悄悄撤销了既有主张——恰恰发生在门限转严的尾部轮次上。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Deferred findings' counting in fresh (the D<round>-<n> bucket question) stays open and decides the all-deferred tail-round shape; it lands with the census-definition batch.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。被延迟 finding 在 fresh 中的计数（D- 桶归属）仍开放，并决定全延迟尾部轮次的形态；将与 census 定义批次一并落地。

[wenshao]

[Suggestion] (1 of 4) The new pin tests claim to pin load-bearing clauses their assertions do not cover. Here: the 'pins the fix-witness mandate in all three of its halves' test pins only a strict prefix of the finding-format line (SKILL.md:773); the format's N/A exemption — "or N/A when the fix adds no guard, branch or behaviour a test can pin" — sits after the pinned substring, is asserted nowhere else in the suite, and the test's own comment claims that exemption is the third half being pinned. An edit deleting the exemption clause keeps the suite green while the rule silently turns an acceptance criterion into a precondition — every finding would owe a nameable test even when the fix adds nothing pinnable.

Suggested change

	'**Fix witness** — the test that must go RED if that fix is removed',
	Pin the exemption itself, e.g. expect(body).toContain('or `N/A` when the fix adds no guard') alongside the existing prefix pin.

中文说明

（1/4）新增的钉住测试声称钉住了承载性条款，但其断言并未覆盖。此处：「以三分支钉住 fix-witness 强制条款」的测试只钉住 finding 格式行（SKILL.md:773）的严格前缀；N/A 豁免——「or N/A when the fix adds no guard, branch or behaviour a test can pin」——位于被钉子串之后，套件中别处从未断言，而测试自身的注释声称该豁免正是被钉的第三分支。删除豁免条款的编辑会让套件保持全绿，同时规则静默地把验收标准变成前置条件——即使修复无可钉之处，每条 finding 也要欠一个可命名的测试。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Same cluster as rc:3824051829: the pin tests' claimed-but-unasserted clauses (the N/A exemption first). Next round extends the pins to match their comments.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。与 rc:3824051829 同一聚类：钉子测试声称但未断言的条款（首先是 N/A 豁免）。下一轮把钉子扩展到与其注释一致。

[wenshao]

[Suggestion] (2 of 4) The census test's own comment claims "what to count" is one of the three clauses that must survive, but no assertion pins the counting semantics — the four assertions cover only the shape string, the omission clause, the module-rules clause, and the narrated-away clause. The actual definitions in SKILL.md:811 (fresh excludes still stands/fixed/cannot tell/superseded; "induced is a SUBSET of fresh"; "It is the attributed count, not the count of findings on new lines") are pinned by nothing. A "simplify the prose" edit removing the "attributed count, not new lines" sentence leaves the suite green; the model then counts new-line findings as induced on a PR that grew a feature between rounds, the census reads induced ≈ fresh, and a false non-convergence REQUEST_CHANGES is filed — "a bar built on the looser number would block a pull request for growing."

Suggested change

	// The census is the numerator/denominator the non-convergence finding is
	Pin the counting semantics, e.g. expect(body).toContain('the ATTRIBUTED count, not the count of findings on newly pushed lines') and expect(body).toContain('induced` is a SUBSET of `fresh`').

中文说明

（2/4）census 测试自身的注释声称「数什么」是必须共同存续的三条款之一，但没有任何断言钉住计数语义——四条断言只覆盖形状字符串、省略条款、模块裁决条款与「不得自行软化」条款。SKILL.md:811 的实际定义（fresh 排除 still stands/fixed/cannot tell/superseded；「induced 是 fresh 的子集」；「这是被归因的计数，不是新推送行上的 finding 数」）无一条被钉住。删除「归因计数而非新行计数」句子的「简化措辞」编辑会让套件保持全绿；模型随后在轮次间新增了功能的 PR 上把新行 finding 计入 induced，census 读作 induced ≈ fresh，误报非收敛 REQUEST_CHANGES——「基于较宽松数字的门槛会因 PR 长大而阻塞它」。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Pinning the census counting semantics (attributed-not-new-lines, the subset clause) stays open; lands with the SKILL.md census-wording batch so pins and text move together.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。钉住 census 计数语义（归因而非新行、子集条款）仍开放；将与 SKILL.md census 措辞批次一并落地，使钉子与文本同步移动。

[wenshao]

[Suggestion] (3 of 4) The test "pins the fix-induced disposition and both of its operands" pins the disposition heading, the two-operand test, and the three guardrails — but not the disposition's defining mechanism, "Re-report the NEW defect under the original id". The test's own comment claims "Attribution needs the DISPOSITION and the two-operand test together", yet the sentence that actually makes attribution happen is the one sentence it does not pin. An edit rewriting the mechanism to "file the new defect under a fresh id" (the pre-rule behavior the guardrails call the failure mode) keeps every pin green; downstream, the census's induced count counts only findings the rule attributed — with the disposition no longer re-reporting under the original id, nothing is attributed, induced is 0 every round, aboveChurnBar never trips, and the deterministic non-convergence blocker never fires on a genuinely churning PR.

Suggested change

	expect(body).toContain('- **fix-induced** —');
	Add a pin for the mechanism sentence, e.g. expect(body).toContain('Re-report the NEW defect **under the original id**').

中文说明

（3/4）「钉住 fix-induced 处置与双操作数」的测试钉住了处置标题、双操作数测试与三条护栏——但没有钉住处置的定义性机制句「Re-report the NEW defect under the original id」。测试自身注释声称「归因需要处置与双操作数测试共同成立」，但真正让归因发生的那句话恰恰是它没有钉住的。把机制改写为「以新 id 上报新缺陷」（护栏们称之为失败模式的本规则出现前行为）的编辑会让所有钉保持全绿；下游 census 的 induced 只数规则归因的 finding——处置不再以原始 id 再报后，什么都未被归因，induced 每轮为 0，aboveChurnBar 永不触发，确定性的非收敛阻塞在真正打转的 PR 上永不生效。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Same work as rc:3824051841: pin "Re-report the NEW defect under the original id" and the carried-forward-under status line. Next round.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。与 rc:3824051841 同一工作：钉住「以原始 id 再报新缺陷」机制句与 carried-forward-under 状态行。下一轮处理。

[wenshao]

[Suggestion] (4 of 4) The compose-state convergence paragraph carries the entire malformed-input contract — "a malformed pair, a float, a negative, or a numerator larger than its denominator is read as no census at all", "zeros written for an unmeasured round are the one input that silently retires a standing non-convergence claim", and "the bar (half or more of fresh, and at least 4 fresh)" — and none of it is pinned; the third test's census pins all resolve to the Step 6 census section, not this compose-state contract (the compose-state doc itself has zero assertions). An edit deleting the failure-semantics sentence stays green; the compose-state doc is the text the model reads when writing compose.json, and with the failure semantics gone a model unsure of its numbers over-omits the field, the streak then carries where the round was measurable-and-low (which would have reset it), and the blocking non-convergence Critical files one round later than the census contract intends.

Suggested change

- `convergence` — this round's census from Step 6's fix-induced rule, as `{"fresh": N, "induced": M}`: how many findings first appeared this round, and how many of those the fix-induced rule attributed to a previous entry's fix (the ATTRIBUTED count, not the count of findings on newly pushed lines). Two integers, `induced <= fresh`; a malformed pair, a float, a negative, or a numerator larger than its denominator is read as no census at all. **Omit the field when the round could not measure it** — absence carries the churn streak forward, a measured low census resets it, and zeros written for an unmeasured round are the one input that silently retires a standing non-convergence claim. `compose-review` owns everything downstream: the bar (half or more of `fresh`, and at least 4 `fresh`), the streak it stamps into the marker as `churnRounds`, and the body Critical it files itself on the second consecutive round above the bar.

Pin a fragment of the compose-state paragraph's unique content, e.g. expect(body).toContain('a numerator larger than its denominator is read as no census at all').

中文说明

（4/4）compose-state 的 convergence 段落承载了全部畸形输入契约——「畸形对、浮点、负数或分子大于分母的输入一律视为没有 census」「为未测量轮写下的零是唯一会静默撤销既有非收敛主张的输入」「门槛（fresh 的一半或更多，且至少 4 条 fresh）」——但其中任何一条都没有被钉住；第三个测试的 census 钉全部落在 Step 6 census 小节，而不是这个 compose-state 契约（compose-state 文档自身零断言）。删除失败语义句子的编辑保持全绿；compose-state 文档是模型写 compose.json 时读的文本，失败语义消失后，对数字不确定的模型会过度省略该字段，streak 于是在「本可测量且偏低（本应清零）」的轮次上被携带，阻塞性非收敛 Critical 比 census 契约预期晚一轮触发。

— deepseek-v4-flash via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.11)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Pinning the compose-state convergence paragraph's failure semantics stays open; lands with the census-wording batch (this round reworded that paragraph's "consecutive" clause without touching the unpinned sentences).

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。钉住 compose-state convergence 段落的失败语义仍开放；将与 census 措辞批次一并落地（本轮只改写了该段的 consecutive 从句，未动未钉句子）。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Test Plan (not a blocker): src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory.

中文说明

Test Plan（非阻断）：src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Critical] R1-7: This blocker rides the verifier-floor-exempt "deterministic by provenance" channel, but half of its trigger — the census (input.convergence) — is model-written, and the module holds deterministic cross-checks it never applies. A round that filed zero findings can post REQUEST_CHANGES: give it convergence: {fresh: 11, induced: 7} beside a recovered streak of 1 and the blocker fires even though nothing was drafted, because churnCensusOf checks shape only (integers, induced <= fresh) and never compares fresh against the findings this round itself reports — all in hand at compose time. deterministicBodyCriticals keeps the verdict hard, and the verification floor can never rule on it because the push lands after the modelBodyCriticals capture. The inverse direction is open too: {fresh: 0, induced: 0} is a valid census that resets a legitimate streak — SKILL.md calls zeros "the one input that silently retires a standing non-convergence claim" and defends that with prose only. The anti-forgery guard defends the marker channel; the census channel needs no forgery at all — the trigger is an orchestrator miscount (the exact new-line/induced confusion the field docstring warns against) or prompt-injecting content in the PR being reviewed.

zero drafted comments + convergence {fresh: 11, induced: 7} + prevLedger churnRounds: 1
→ "This pull request is not converging. Of the 11 findings first filed in round 4, 7 were introduced…"
  event = REQUEST_CHANGES
adding the one-sided bound (fresh > this round's own reported-finding total → no census)
→ event = APPROVE

Treat a census whose fresh exceeds the round's own reported-finding total as no census at all (null → streak carried), and correct the provenance comment above the push — "this module counted it" is true only of the streak half. Fix witness: compose-review.test.ts — a round with zero drafted comments and {fresh: 11, induced: 7} must compose APPROVE; remove the bound and it reds.

中文说明

这条阻塞项走的是「按来源即确定性、免除 verifier 门槛」的通道，但它的触发条件有一半——普查（input.convergence）——是模型写入的，而模块手里明明握着从未使用的确定性交叉校验。一个没有提交任何发现的轮次也能发出 REQUEST_CHANGES：只要给它 convergence: {fresh: 11, induced: 7} 加一个恢复出来的连续计数 1，阻塞项就会触发，因为 churnCensusOf 只做形状校验（整数、induced <= fresh），从不把 fresh 与本轮自己实际上报的发现数对比——而这个数据在组装时全都在手。deterministicBodyCriticals 会让裁决保持强硬，而验证门槛永远无法审查它，因为该 push 发生在 modelBodyCriticals 截取之后。反方向同样敞开：{fresh: 0, induced: 0} 是一个合法普查，会把一个正当的连续计数清零——SKILL.md 称零是「唯一能悄悄撤销一项已成立的不收敛声明的输入」，而对此只有文字防御。防伪守卫保护的是 marker 通道；普查通道根本无需伪造——触发条件是编排者的误计（正是字段文档警告的「新行/induced 混淆」），或是被审查 PR 中的提示注入内容。修复方向：把 fresh 超过本轮自报发现总数的普查当作无普查处理（null → 连续计数原样携带），并更正 push 上方的来源注释——「本模块统计了它」只对连续计数那一半成立。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Critical] R1-13: These new round-scoped fields survive persistRecoveredLedger's anonymous-recovery branch in pr-context.ts when it advances the round counter past a foreign winner. That branch drops sha/commitId/posted/prevPosted — its own comment says keeping them "would attribute this account's round-3 … to the foreign round 5 that won recovery — one fabricated point on a trend" — but churnRounds/fresh/induced flow through ...kept and are re-dated across the foreign round. The streak is decision-bearing: round 3 above the bar (streak 1) → identity lookup fails while a foreign round-5 marker wins → {...kept, round: 5} keeps round 3's streak and census; the next round cannot measure a census (commitId was dropped), so compose CARRIES the re-dated streak; the next measurable above-bar round advances it to 2 and posts the REQUEST_CHANGES blocker one round early, across a round this account never ran — and discards the foreign winner's own streak state, including a below-bar RESET. Probed on both arms: as-is the write keeps churnRounds: 1, fresh: 10, induced: 6 beside round: 5; adding the three fields to the drop destructure removes them with all 10 existing persist tests green. AGENTS.md: "for every added field … grep its read sites, including outside the diff" — this persist site is the seam. If churn survival across the jump is intended instead (its doc says it is "carried exactly the way a finding id is"), fresh/induced still belong in the drop set, and the survival should be stated in the branch comment — either way, cover it in pr-context-persist.test.ts, which has no churnRounds assertion in any branch today. Fix witness: an anonymous-advance fixture carrying churnRounds: 2 that asserts the written side file matches the chosen semantics; it reds under the opposite behaviour.

中文说明

这些新的按轮次字段在 pr-context.ts 的 persistRecoveredLedger 匿名恢复分支中会存活下来：当该分支把轮次计数器推进到一个外部胜出轮次时，它会丢弃 sha/commitId/posted/prevPosted——其自身注释写明保留它们「会把本账号第 3 轮的……归因到赢得恢复的外部第 5 轮——在趋势上凭空制造一个点」——但 churnRounds/fresh/induced 会经由 ...kept 存活，被重新标注到外部轮次上。这个连续计数是参与决策的：第 3 轮越过门槛（连续计数 1）→ 身份查询失败而外部第 5 轮 marker 胜出 → {...kept, round: 5} 保留了第 3 轮的连续计数与普查；下一轮无法测量普查（commitId 已被丢弃），于是组装原样携带这个被改期的连续计数；再下一个可测量且越线的轮次把它推进到 2，提前一轮发出 REQUEST_CHANGES 阻塞项——横跨一个本账号从未运行过的轮次——同时还丢弃了外部胜出者自己的连续计数状态（包括一次低于门槛的重置）。已在两侧验证：现状写入会在 round: 5 旁保留 churnRounds: 1, fresh: 10, induced: 6；把这三个字段加入 drop 解构后它们被移除，且既有 10 个 persist 测试全部为绿。AGENTS.md：「对每个新增字段……grep 其读取点，包括 diff 之外」——这个持久化点正是那个缝隙。修复见证：一个携带 churnRounds: 2 的匿名推进夹具，断言写出的 side file 符合所选语义；在相反行为下会变红。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R1-1: The fix-witness mandate is pinned in SKILL.md by three assertions in SKILL.test.ts, but its parallel half here — the FINDING_FORMAT actually embedded in finder briefs — has no pin anywhere. Deleting the Fix witness line and the trailing "owes a test" paragraph leaves every test green (observed: 93 test files, 4201 tests), and finder agents silently stop being asked for the acceptance criterion — the exact "criterion recorded and never reaching the fixer" failure the SKILL.test.ts comment says the pins exist to prevent, arriving through the sibling surface those pins do not cover. Add an assertion in agent-prompt.test.ts that a finding-filing role's brief contains the **Fix witness:** format line (the file already pins format presence per role via **Anchor:**), plus the "never gates reporting" clause. Fix witness: that assertion reds when the FINDING_FORMAT line is deleted.

中文说明

fix-witness 要求在 SKILL.md 中由 SKILL.test.ts 的三条断言钉住，但它在这里的平行一半——真正嵌入 finder 简报的 FINDING_FORMAT——没有任何钉子。删掉 Fix witness 行和结尾的「欠一个测试」段落，所有测试仍为绿（实测：93 个测试文件、4201 个测试），finder agent 会在无人察觉的情况下不再被要求给出验收标准——这正是 SKILL.test.ts 注释声称这些钉子要防止的「标准被记录却永远到不了修复者」的失败，从那些钉子未覆盖的兄弟表面发生。建议在 agent-prompt.test.ts 中增加断言：某个提交 finding 的角色的简报包含 **Fix witness:** 格式行（该文件已通过 **Anchor:** 按角色钉住格式存在），以及「永不阻断上报」条款。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Same work as rc:3824047036: pin the Fix witness format line and the never-gates-reporting clause in agent-prompt.test.ts. Next round.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。与 rc:3824047036 同一工作：在 agent-prompt.test.ts 中钉住 Fix witness 格式行与「永不阻断上报」条款。下一轮处理。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R1-2: The minimum-round floor is pinned only from below, and symbolically: because the assertion is written against CHURN_MIN_FRESH - 1, changing the constant reds nothing (observed: mutating 4→5 keeps all 446 tests green — every other assertion uses fresh values of 10 or more), and no test exercises fresh === CHURN_MIN_FRESH. Rounds with exactly four first-appearing findings — 2 of them fix-induced, the constant's own docblock's "weakest statement that is still a statement" — would silently stop arming the streak. Add the companion pin beside the existing one:

Suggested change

	expect(aboveChurnBar({ fresh: CHURN_MIN_FRESH - 1, induced: 3 })).toBe(
	false,
	);
	expect(aboveChurnBar({ fresh: CHURN_MIN_FRESH - 1, induced: 3 })).toBe(
	false,
	);
	expect(aboveChurnBar({ fresh: CHURN_MIN_FRESH, induced: 2 })).toBe(true);

Fix witness: the new assertion reds when CHURN_MIN_FRESH is raised.

中文说明

最小轮次门槛只从下方被钉住，而且是符号化的：因为断言写的是 CHURN_MIN_FRESH - 1，修改常量不会让任何测试变红（实测：4→5 变异下 446 个测试全绿——其余所有断言使用的 fresh 值都在 10 以上），也没有测试覆盖 fresh === CHURN_MIN_FRESH。恰好有四个首次出现发现的轮次——其中两个是 fix-induced，即该常量文档所说的「仍然成其为声明的最弱声明」——会在无人察觉的情况下不再让连续计数累计。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R1-3: The >= in the filing condition is unpinned: every filing test lands the streak at exactly 2 (churnRounds: 1 + one above-bar round), so no test files a round whose streak is already at or past the bar with an above-bar census. Mutating >= to === keeps the whole suite green (observed), yet a genuinely churning PR — blocker already filed once, next round above the bar at streak 3 — silently stops receiving the blocker forever after, which is precisely the PR the mechanism exists for. The same gap leaves ordinalSuffix's rd/st/teen branches unpinned: mutating case 3 to 'th' also stays green, so "the 3rd consecutive round" would render "3th" with no red test. Add one test: prevLedger({ round: 4, churnRounds: CHURN_STREAK_TO_FILE }) with convergence: { fresh: 12, induced: 8 }; assert the body contains the 3rd consecutive round, parseLedger(r.body)!.churnRounds is 3, and r.event is REQUEST_CHANGES. Fix witness: that test reds if >= becomes === or ordinalSuffix loses the rd branch.

中文说明

提交条件中的 >= 没有被钉住：所有提交测试都把连续计数恰好落在 2（churnRounds: 1 + 一个越线轮次），因此没有测试覆盖「连续计数已在或已超过门槛、且本轮普查越线」的轮次。把 >= 变异为 ===，整个测试套件仍为绿（实测），但一个真正打转的 PR——阻塞项已经发出一次、下一轮以连续计数 3 越线——会在首次发出之后永远不再收到阻塞项，而这恰恰是该机制存在的目标。同样的缺口也让 ordinalSuffix 的 rd/st/teen 分支未被钉住：把 case 3 变异为 'th' 同样保持绿色，「the 3rd consecutive round」会在没有红色测试的情况下渲染成「3th」。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R1-10: The census counting definition — fix-induced findings count toward fresh — has no test pin: the new census test in SKILL.test.ts pins the handoff shape (convergence: {"fresh": N, "induced": M}) and the absence-vs-zero clause, but not this sentence defining what is counted. Probed: deleting "plus the fix-induced ones that took a previous id (they are new defects; the id is bookkeeping)" from the definition leaves SKILL.test.ts and compose-review.test.ts fully green (26/26). Rounds whose new findings are predominantly fix-induced then report fresh ≈ 0, land below CHURN_MIN_FRESH (4), reset the streak every round, and the non-convergence blocker never fires on exactly the churning loop it was built to catch. Add to the census test:

expect(body).toContain('plus the fix-induced ones that took a previous id');

(and the subset clause induced is a SUBSET of fresh). Fix witness: the assertion reds when the clause is deleted.

中文说明

普查的计数定义——fix-induced 的发现计入 fresh——没有测试钉子：SKILL.test.ts 中新的普查测试钉住了交接形态（convergence: {"fresh": N, "induced": M}）和「缺省不等于零」条款，却没有钉住这句定义「数什么」的句子。已用探针验证：从定义中删除「plus the fix-induced ones that took a previous id (they are new defects; the id is bookkeeping)」，SKILL.test.ts 与 compose-review.test.ts 完全保持绿色（26/26）。此后，新发现以 fix-induced 为主的轮次会上报 fresh ≈ 0，落在 CHURN_MIN_FRESH（4）之下，每轮重置连续计数，非收敛阻塞项在它本应捕捉的打转循环上永不触发。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Pinning the census counting definition ("plus the fix-induced ones that took a previous id" and the subset clause) stays open; lands with the census-wording batch.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。钉住 census 计数定义（拿到旧 id 的 fix-induced 条目、子集条款）仍开放；将与 census 措辞批次一并落地。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R1-19: Fix-induced churn inside an already-collapsed family is structurally invisible to the census. The fold rule (~line 801, pre-existing) mandates a brand-new sibling of an open class finding folds into the class's re-report and is "never filed under its own id", and the fix-induced disposition cannot apply to the class entry itself ("the entry's own reported input is closed" — an entrance patch never closes an unbounded-surface class finding; the text itself says rule it fixed only when the structural change lands). The census counts only findings that took a new id or a previous id and excludes still stands re-reports — so a fix-induced sibling that takes NO id lands in neither fresh nor induced. Scenario: class finding C ("the hand-rolled parsing surface is unbounded") open on the ledger; each round the fixer patches one entrance and the patch opens a new entrance. Every round: C is ruled still stands (excluded from fresh), the sibling folds with no id of its own (never counted); the census reads below-bar every round, the streak never arms, and the escalation never fires no matter how many rounds the loop circles — in exactly the unbounded shape the class mechanism exists to flag. The "they are new defects; the id is bookkeeping" clause shows the author counted new-defect-bearing-old-id cases but not no-id-at-all cases. Add a carve-out: a brand-new sibling folded into an open class finding still counts toward fresh, and toward induced when the two-operand test attributes it — census counting is per-defect, not per-id.

中文说明

已折叠家族内部的 fix-induced 返工对普查在结构上不可见。折叠规则（约 801 行，既有）要求：一个开放类 finding 的全新兄弟折叠进该类的重新上报，且「从不以它自己的 id 提交」；而 fix-induced 裁定无法应用于类条目本身（「该条目自己报告的输入已关闭」——入口补丁永远不会关闭一个无界表面的类 finding；文本自身也说只有结构性改动落地才裁 fixed）。普查只统计拿到新 id 或旧 id 的发现，并排除 still stands 的重报——因此一个不拿任何 id 的 fix-induced 兄弟既不计入 fresh 也不计入 induced。场景：类 finding C（「手写解析表面是无界的」）在 ledger 上开放；每一轮修复者补上一个入口、补丁又打开一个新入口。每一轮：C 被裁 still stands（不计入 fresh），兄弟折叠时没有自己的 id（永不被统计）；普查每轮都读作低于门槛，连续计数永不累计，无论循环打转多少轮，升级永不触发——恰恰发生在类机制存在就是为了标记的无界形态上。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Fix-induced churn inside a collapsed family counting in neither bucket stays open; the carve-out (census counts per-defect, not per-id) is a counting-definition change and lands with that batch.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。已折叠家族内部的 fix-induced 返工两桶都不计的问题仍开放；豁免条款（census 按缺陷计数而非按 id）属于计数定义变更，将与该批次一并落地。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R1-12: This Step 8 compose-state bullet is the input-contract copy of the census rules (field shape, malformed-pair semantics, absence-vs-zero streak effect), but every test pin lands on Step 6's parallel clauses at ~line 811 — verified mechanically: convergence: {"fresh": N, "induced": M} and **Omitting is not the same as zero** each occur exactly once in SKILL.md (Step 6), and grep across packages/ finds no test pinning "absence carries the churn streak forward" or "malformed pair, a float, a negative". So this bullet — the one the model follows when typing compose.json — can be rewritten or deleted with every test green. Probed: inverting it to "Write {"fresh": 0, "induced": 0} when the round could not measure it — zeros carry the churn streak forward, and an absent field resets it" leaves 26/26 green; the mechanism half is real too — churnCensusOf accepts {0,0} as a measured-low census and the streak resets. Extend the census pin in SKILL.test.ts to this copy:

expect(body).toContain('absence carries the churn streak forward');
expect(body).toContain('a malformed pair, a float, a negative, or a numerator larger than its denominator is read as no census at all');

Fix witness: those assertions red when the bullet is inverted or deleted.

中文说明

这条 Step 8 的 compose-state 要点是普查规则的输入契约副本（字段形态、非法对的语义、缺省与零对连续计数的影响），但所有测试钉子都落在 Step 6 约 811 行的平行条款上——机械化验证：convergence: {"fresh": N, "induced": M} 与 **Omitting is not the same as zero** 在 SKILL.md 中各恰好出现一次（Step 6），且对 packages/ 的 grep 未发现任何测试钉住「absence carries the churn streak forward」或「malformed pair, a float, a negative」。因此这一条——模型在输入 compose.json 时所遵循的那一条——可以在所有测试保持绿色的情况下被改写或删除。已用探针验证：把它反转为「当轮次无法测量时写入 {"fresh": 0, "induced": 0}——零会携带连续计数，缺省字段则重置它」，26/26 保持绿色；机制那一半也是真实的——churnCensusOf 把 {0,0} 当作一次测量到的低值普查接受，连续计数被重置。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Pinning the compose-state bullet's input contract (absence-carries, malformed-pair semantics) stays open; lands with the census-wording batch.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。钉住 compose-state 要点的输入契约（缺省携带、畸形对语义）仍开放；将与 census 措辞批次一并落地。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R1-11: This test is named "pins the fix-witness mandate in all three of its halves", but its assertions pin only two halves — the N/A exemption it names as the third half is covered by no assertion. The finding-format assertion ends at …**must go RED if that fix is removed**, before SKILL.md:773's exemption clause "or N/A when the fix adds no guard, branch or behaviour a test can pin", and nothing covers SKILL.md:1023's "A finding whose fixWitness is N/A adds nothing" (grep for N/A in this file matches only the comment above). Probed: rewriting both exemption clauses into reporting bars ("A finding may not post until its fixWitness is supplied…") leaves 26/26 green — the exact regression the comment says this test exists to catch. Add the missing pins inside this test:

Suggested change

	// 3. the exemption has to stay `N/A` rather than a bar on reporting —
	// 3. the exemption has to stay `N/A` rather than a bar on reporting —
	// without it the next edit turns an acceptance criterion into a
	// precondition and the rule starts costing findings.
	const body = skillBody();
	expect(body).toContain(
	'**Fix witness** — the test that must go RED if that fix is removed',
	);
	expect(body).toContain(
	'or `N/A` when the fix adds no guard, branch or behaviour a test can pin',
	);
	expect(body).toContain(
	'A finding whose `fixWitness` is `N/A` adds nothing',
	);

Fix witness: the new assertions red when either exemption clause becomes a precondition.

中文说明

这个测试名为「钉住 fix-witness 要求的全部三个一半」，但它的断言只钉住了两个一半——它称为第三个一半的 N/A 豁免没有任何断言覆盖。finding 格式断言止于 …**must go RED if that fix is removed**，在 SKILL.md:773 的豁免条款「or N/A when the fix adds no guard, branch or behaviour a test can pin」之前，也没有任何断言覆盖 SKILL.md:1023 的「A finding whose fixWitness is N/A adds nothing」（在本文件中 grep N/A 只命中上面的注释）。已用探针验证：把两处豁免条款改写为上报门槛（「一个 finding 在提供 fixWitness 之前不得发布……」），26/26 保持绿色——正是注释声称本测试存在就是为了捕捉的回归。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Same cluster as rc:3824047133: the three-halves test's missing N/A-exemption assertions. Next round.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。与 rc:3824047133 同一聚类：三分支测试缺失的 N/A 豁免断言。下一轮处理。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R1-14: The test named "pins the fix-induced disposition and both of its operands" pins the disposition only by its heading label — the operative instruction at SKILL.md:798, "Re-report the NEW defect under the original id" and the status-line format "carried forward under R1-2", is asserted nowhere (grep for "under the original id" / "carried forward under" across packages/ matches only SKILL.md prose). Probed: rewording SKILL.md:798 to re-report under a fresh id with a cross-reference leaves 26/26 green including this test — then rounds following the edited text post induced defects under fresh ids, the census counting clause ("the fix-induced ones that took a previous id", itself unpinned per the finding above) no longer matches reality, induced collapses toward 0, the streak never arms, and the non-convergence blocker never fires on the loop it was built for. Add the operative pins:

expect(body).toContain('Re-report the NEW defect under the original id');
expect(body).toContain('carried forward under R1-2');

Fix witness: those assertions red when the disposition is reworded to fresh-id reporting.

中文说明

名为「钉住 fix-induced 裁定及其两个操作数」的测试只通过标题标签钉住了裁定——SKILL.md:798 的操作性指示「把新缺陷在原始 id 下重新上报」以及状态行格式「carried forward under R1-2」没有任何断言（对 packages/ grep "under the original id" / "carried forward under" 只命中 SKILL.md 正文）。已用探针验证：把 SKILL.md:798 改写为以新 id 重报并交叉引用，26/26 保持绿色且包括本测试——此后遵循被编辑文本的轮次会以新 id 发布 induced 缺陷，普查计数条款（「拿到旧 id 的 fix-induced 者」，按上一条 finding 它自身也没有钉子）不再与现实匹配，induced 坍缩到 0，连续计数永不累计，非收敛阻塞项在它本应服务的循环上永不触发。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Deferred to the next round — this round's batch was bounded (~8 findings) and spent on the three Criticals first. Same work as rc:3824047145: the operative disposition pins ("under the original id", "carried forward under R1-2"). Next round.

中文说明

延迟到下一轮——本轮批次有上限（约 8 条 finding），优先处理了三条 Critical。与 rc:3824047145 同一工作：处置机制钉子（under the original id、carried forward under R1-2）。下一轮处理。

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

✅ AutoFix round 6 finished — view run. See this round's report below.

中文说明

✅ AutoFix 第 6 轮已完成 —— 查看运行。本轮报告见下方。

[doudouOUC]

No issues found. LGTM! ✅

中文说明

未发现问题。LGTM！✅

— qwen-code-review via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.10)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 1/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 1/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Round summary — PR #9596 (review-fix-witness-convergence)

This round implemented the three Criticals first, plus the cheap adjacent
clusters they share code with, per the ~8-findings-per-round bound. Fifteen
findings are resolved in this commit; the remaining thirty-five are deferred
to the next round with a reply on each of their threads
(comment-replies.json). No conflicts (--conflict false); the branch
rebases cleanly on the already-fetched head.

Resolved (in commit 78ae615)

Criticals

• rc:3824051685 — the census is model-written; a round that filed zero
  findings could post REQUEST_CHANGES. Fixed: composeReview now refuses a
  census whose fresh exceeds everything the round itself reports — drafted
  comments, body Criticals and deferrals counted together — as no census at
  all (the streak carries, exactly as absence does). The provenance comment
  above the push is corrected: "this module counted it" was true only of the
  streak half; the census half is now named as orchestrator-supplied and
  checked. Witness: a zero-report round with {fresh: 11, induced: 7} and a
  carried streak composes APPROVE; removing the bound reds the test.
• rc:3824051692 (+ duplicate rc:3824046860, + the seam coverage asked
  by rc:3824051767) — the new round-scoped fields survive
  persistRecoveredLedger's anonymous-recovery branch. Fixed: the
  anonymous-advance branch now drops churnRounds/fresh/induced alongside
  sha/commitId/posted/prevPosted — the same class of round-specific
  fact; kept, they re-date the streak across a round this account never ran
  (arming the blocker one round early) and discard the foreign winner's own
  streak state, a below-bar reset included. Dropped, the streak re-arms from
  scratch: a round of lateness, never earliness. Witnesses: the
  anonymous-advance fixture now carries all three fields and asserts the
  written file drops them (reds if the drop is removed); the plain
  identity-known path round-trips them (reds if that write is ever
  field-picked).
• rc:3824047052 — two distinct fix-induced findings traced to the same
  previous entry both re-report under its id, and the duplicate-id refusal
  fails the whole round. Fixed: SKILL Step 6's fix-induced rule gains a
  fourth guardrail — one re-report per original id per round; the second
  defect takes a fresh R<round>-<n>, counted in fresh but not induced.
  Witness: two new pins in SKILL.test.ts (red when the clause is removed).

Suggestions resolved with the Criticals' code paths

• rc:3824046926 + rc:3824051743 — the blocker says "most" but the
  bar fires at exactly half. Fixed the text to match the arithmetic (the
  documented intent — "half or more" in both the docblock's first sentence
  and SKILL's compose-state contract — stays behavior): the posted message
  now says "at least half", and the aboveChurnBar rationale no longer says
  "needs a majority". Witness: the filing pin now spans the whole corrected
  sentence; reverting to "most" reds it (probed).
• rc:3824046946 + rc:3824051735 — the blocker asserts "consecutive"
  rounds although the streak carries through unmeasured rounds. Fixed: the
  message now reads "the Nth round counted against the churn bar (rounds
  that could not measure carry the count rather than reset it)", and the
  CHURN_STREAK_TO_FILE docblock, the ledger churnRounds field doc and the
  two SKILL.md sentences are reworded to match. Witness: same extended pin.
• rc:3824046934 + rc:3824051751 — the aboveChurnBar docblock
  restated the rejected looser metric. Fixed: the first sentence now names
  the attributed count, and the rationale says what the bar actually decides.
• rc:3824051779 — a forged marker inflates the posted ordinal
  ("the 10000th consecutive round"). Fixed: parseLedger clamps a recovered
  streak to the marker's own round — the streak counts rounds inside the
  round it rides, same invariant as the finding-id squat filter. This also
  bounds the ordinal arm of rc:3824046890. Witness: {round: 2, churnRounds: 9999} parses as streak 2; a streak at the round rides
  untouched; removing the clamp reds the test. The pre-existing cap test's
  read arm moved to a round-at-the-cap marker so both clamps are visible.
• rc:3824046950 + rc:3824051729 — ordinalSuffix only exercised at
  streak 2; the >= filing condition unpinned. Fixed: one test files a
  streak-3 round (pins >= — reds under === — and the rd branch), and a
  direct exercise of nonConvergenceCritical pins 3rd, 11th, 12th,
  21st (reds when case 3 becomes 'th').
• rc:3824051707 — CHURN_MIN_FRESH pinned only from below,
  symbolically. Fixed: the companion pin aboveChurnBar({fresh: CHURN_MIN_FRESH, induced: 2}) === true reds when the constant is raised.

All existing census fixtures were made honest at the same time: the test
helper now drafts one comment per claimed fresh finding, because the new
bound checks the denominator against the round's own reports.

Deferred to the next round (replies posted on each thread)

Deferred under the per-round bound, not declined — each keeps its thread
open: rc:3824046890 (residual cross-check), rc:3824046906, rc:3824046917,
rc:3824046956, rc:3824046973, rc:3824046984, rc:3824046998, rc:3824047004,
rc:3824047015, rc:3824047024, rc:3824047036, rc:3824047045, rc:3824047060,
rc:3824047067, rc:3824047080, rc:3824047088, rc:3824047093, rc:3824047103,
rc:3824047109, rc:3824047114, rc:3824047119, rc:3824047123, rc:3824047133,
rc:3824047139, rc:3824047145, rc:3824047153, rc:3824051695, rc:3824051774,
rc:3824051792, rc:3824051799, rc:3824051805, rc:3824051813, rc:3824051819,
rc:3824051829, rc:3824051841.

Review-body notes

• rv:4985820119 (CHANGES_REQUESTED, automated): its two Critical inline
  findings (R1-7, R1-13) are the rc:3824051685 / rc:3824051692 items fixed
  above. Its "Test Plan (not a blocker)" note names
  src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts, which does not exist — the
  PR body's Test Plan typoed the file this PR actually adds tests to
  (packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts). The PR body is
  owned by the workflow, so this round records the correction here instead
  of editing it.
• rv:4985814736 (COMMENTED, downgraded self-PR): disclosure-only; its
  findings are the inline comments handled above. The "Integration Tests
  (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped" note matches CI; the touched behavior is
  covered by the unit suites below, and integration harnesses do not exercise
  the compose-side churn path.

Verification

• npm run build — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed (exit 0)
• npm run lint — passed (exit 0)
• cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review src/utils/findings.test.ts — 93 files, 4206 passed | 4 skipped
• cd packages/core && npx vitest run src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts — 26 passed
• Mutation probes (each witness reds when its guard is removed, then restored to green):
  1. census bound removed → refuses a census that out-counts reds
  2. anonymous drop removed → ANONYMOUS higher round advances reds
  3. SKILL one-re-report clause removed → pins the fix-induced disposition reds
  4. parseLedger clamp removed → clamps a recovered streak reds
  5. >= → === in the filing condition → keeps filing on every counted round reds
  6. ordinalSuffix case 3 → 'th' → renders the ordinal past the filing bar reds
  7. CHURN_MIN_FRESH 4→5 → sets the bar at half or more reds
  8. old "consecutive/most" message restored → files the blocker reds
  9. "at least half" → "most" → files the blocker reds
• Integration tests not run: the touched behavior (compose-side churn
  decision, side-file persist) is fully exercised by the unit suites above;
  no bundled-CLI-only path changed.

中文说明

轮次总结 — PR #9596（review-fix-witness-convergence）

本轮按照「每轮最多约 8 条 finding」的界限，优先实现三条 Critical，以及与它们共享代码路径的廉价相邻聚类。本次提交解决 15 条 finding；其余 35 条延迟到下一轮，并已在各自线程上回复（comment-replies.json）。无冲突（--conflict false）；分支在已拉取的 head 上干净衔接。

已解决（提交 78ae615）

Critical

• rc:3824051685 — census 由模型写入；一个没有提交任何发现的轮次也能发出 REQUEST_CHANGES。 已修复：composeReview 现在拒绝 fresh 超过本轮自身上报总量（drafted comments、body Criticals 与 deferrals 三者合计）的普查——视同没有普查（streak 原样携带，与缺省完全一致）。push 上方的来源注释已更正：「本模块统计了它」只对 streak 一侧成立；census 一侧现在明确标注为编排器提供且经过校验。见证：零上报轮次 + {fresh: 11, induced: 7} + 携带 streak 时组装结果为 APPROVE；移除该界限后测试变红。
• rc:3824051692（+ 重复条 rc:3824046860，+ rc:3824051767 要求的接缝覆盖）— 新的按轮次字段在 persistRecoveredLedger 的匿名恢复分支中存活。 已修复：匿名推进分支现在将 churnRounds/fresh/induced 与 sha/commitId/posted/prevPosted 一并丢弃——它们是同一类「属于某一轮的事实」；若保留，会把 streak 重新标注到本账号从未运行的轮次上（让阻塞项提前一轮触发），并丢弃外部胜出者自身的 streak 状态（包括一次低于门槛的清零）。丢弃后 streak 从零重新累计：只可能晚一轮，绝不提前。见证：匿名推进夹具现在携带这三个字段并断言写出的文件将其丢弃（移除 drop 后变红）；身份已知的普通路径原样往返这三个字段（若该写入被按字段挑选则变红）。
• rc:3824047052 — 两个不同的 fix-induced finding 追溯到同一条上一轮条目时都以原 id 再报，重复 id 拒绝会使整轮失败。 已修复：SKILL Step 6 的 fix-induced 规则新增第四条护栏——每个原始 id 每轮至多一次再报；第二个缺陷取得新 R<round>-<n>，计入 fresh 但不计入 induced。见证：SKILL.test.ts 两条新钉子（删除条款后变红）。

随 Critical 代码路径一并解决的 Suggestion

• rc:3824046926 + rc:3824051743 — 阻塞项称「most」，但门槛在恰好一半时就触发。 已修复文案使其与算术一致（文档意图——docblock 首句与 SKILL compose-state 契约均写「一半或更多」——行为保持不变）：发布的措辞改为「at least half」，aboveChurnBar 的理由不再写「需要多数」。见证：提交钉子现覆盖整句更正后的文案；恢复「most」会变红（已探针验证）。
• rc:3824046946 + rc:3824051735 — 阻塞项声称「连续」轮次，但 streak 会穿越未测量轮原样携带。 已修复：措辞改为「第 N 个计入 churn bar 的轮次（未能测量的轮次携带计数而非清零）」，CHURN_STREAK_TO_FILE docblock、ledger churnRounds 字段文档与 SKILL.md 两处句子同步改写。见证：同上述扩展钉子。
• rc:3824046934 + rc:3824051751 — aboveChurnBar 的 docblock 复述了被否决的较宽松口径。 已修复：首句改为指名「被归因的计数」，理由句改写为该门槛实际裁决的内容。
• rc:3824051779 — 伪造 marker 夸大发布措辞中的序数（「第 10000 个连续轮次」）。 已修复：parseLedger 将恢复出的 streak 钳制到 marker 自身声称的轮次——streak 统计的是它所搭载轮次以内的轮次，与 finding id 抢注过滤器同一不变量。这也限制了 rc:3824046890 中序数夸大的一侧。见证：{round: 2, churnRounds: 9999} 解析为 streak 2；等于轮次的 streak 原样保留；移除钳制后测试变红。既有的上限测试读取侧改用「轮次位于上限」的 marker，使两层钳制都可见。
• rc:3824046950 + rc:3824051729 — ordinalSuffix 只在 streak 2 时被触发；>= 提交条件未被钉住。 已修复：一个测试提交 streak 3 的轮次（钉住 >=——变异为 === 后变红——以及 rd 分支），并直接调用 nonConvergenceCritical 钉住 3rd、11th、12th、21st（case 3 变异为 'th' 后变红）。
• rc:3824051707 — CHURN_MIN_FRESH 只从下方被符号化地钉住。 已修复：补充伴生钉子 aboveChurnBar({fresh: CHURN_MIN_FRESH, induced: 2}) === true，抬高常量即变红。

同时把既有的 census 夹具全部改诚实：测试助手现在按声称的 fresh 数量逐条起草评论，因为新界限会用轮次自身的上报校验分母。

延迟到下一轮（已在各线程回复）

按每轮界限延迟、并非拒绝——各自线程保持打开：rc:3824046890（残余交叉校验）、rc:3824046906、rc:3824046917、rc:3824046956、rc:3824046973、rc:3824046984、rc:3824046998、rc:3824047004、rc:3824047015、rc:3824047024、rc:3824047036、rc:3824047045、rc:3824047060、rc:3824047067、rc:3824047080、rc:3824047088、rc:3824047093、rc:3824047103、rc:3824047109、rc:3824047114、rc:3824047119、rc:3824047123、rc:3824047133、rc:3824047139、rc:3824047145、rc:3824047153、rc:3824051695、rc:3824051774、rc:3824051792、rc:3824051799、rc:3824051805、rc:3824051813、rc:3824051819、rc:3824051829、rc:3824051841。

Review 正文备注

• rv:4985820119（CHANGES_REQUESTED，自动评审）：其两条 Critical 行内 finding（R1-7、R1-13）即上方已修复的 rc:3824051685 / rc:3824051692。其「Test Plan（非阻断）」备注提到的 src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts 并不存在——PR 正文的 Test Plan 把本 PR 实际新增测试的文件（packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts）写错了。PR 正文由工作流管理，故本轮在此记录更正而不是直接修改。
• rv:4985814736（COMMENTED，self-PR 降级）：仅为披露；其 finding 即上文处理的行内评论。「Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped」与 CI 一致；本次触及的行为由下方单测套件覆盖，集成测试并不演练 compose 侧的 churn 路径。

验证

• npm run build — 通过
• npm run typecheck — 通过（exit 0）
• npm run lint — 通过（exit 0）
• cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review src/utils/findings.test.ts — 93 个文件，4206 通过 | 4 跳过
• cd packages/core && npx vitest run src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts — 26 通过
• 变异探针（每个见证在其 guard 被移除时变红，恢复后回绿）：
  1. 移除 census 界限 → refuses a census that out-counts 变红
  2. 移除匿名 drop → ANONYMOUS higher round advances 变红
  3. 移除 SKILL 单 id 单次再报条款 → pins the fix-induced disposition 变红
  4. 移除 parseLedger 钳制 → clamps a recovered streak 变红
  5. 提交条件 >= → === → keeps filing on every counted round 变红
  6. ordinalSuffix case 3 → 'th' → renders the ordinal past the filing bar 变红
  7. CHURN_MIN_FRESH 4→5 → sets the bar at half or more 变红
  8. 恢复旧的「consecutive/most」措辞 → files the blocker 变红
  9. 「at least half」→「most」→ files the blocker 变红
• 未运行集成测试：本次触及的行为（compose 侧 churn 裁决、side file 持久化）已由上方单测套件完整覆盖；没有仅经 bundle CLI 才可达的路径被改动。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[doudouOUC]

Round-2 re-review at e631d95 (no new commits since round 1). I independently re-checked the three open Criticals against the code at the reviewed commit — all three still stand:

1. compose-review.ts:1194 — census never cross-checked (R1-7). churnCensusOf validates shape only (integers, induced <= fresh); it never compares fresh against the findings this round itself reported, which is in hand at compose time. A round that filed zero findings can still post REQUEST_CHANGES given a miscounted or injected census beside a recovered streak ({fresh: 11, induced: 7} + streak 1). The one-sided bound — treat a fresh exceeding this round's own reported total as no census — is the cheap deterministic guard. The inverse ({fresh: 0, induced: 0} silently resetting a legitimate streak) is defended only by prose.
2. ledger.ts:145 — churn fields survive anonymous recovery (R1-13). persistRecoveredLedger's anonymous-recovery branch (pr-context.ts) drops sha/commitId/posted/prevPosted as facts about a specific round, but churnRounds/fresh/induced ride ...kept and are re-dated across the foreign round that won recovery. The branch's own rationale applies to them, and the decision-bearing churnRounds can then fire the non-convergence blocker a round early, across a round this account never ran. No churnRounds assertion exists in pr-context-persist.test.ts.
3. SKILL.md:798 — fix-induced rule has no same-entry cap. The rule re-reports a new defect under the original entry's id but provides nothing for two distinct fix-induced defects traced to the SAME entry — both take that id, and validateFindings (findings.ts:444) then throws on the duplicate id, failing the whole round on exactly the churning-site PRs the rule targets.

Verification I ran at the reviewed commit: the three changed suites pass (compose-review.test.ts + ledger.test.ts + findings.test.ts = 564, SKILL.test.ts = 26); script-lint clean (no executable scripts changed). The Test Plan's run-ledger.test.ts reference does resolve — the file exists at packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts; the earlier "no such file" notes were a path-resolution artifact (checked from the worktree root instead of packages/cli), not a defect.

Verdict: Request changes — the three round-1 Criticals are unaddressed and still stand.

中文说明

第 2 轮复审，commit 仍为 e631d95（相较第 1 轮无新提交）。我独立对照被审 commit 的代码复核了三个未关闭的 Critical——三者均成立：

1. compose-review.ts:1194 — census 缺少交叉校验（R1-7）。 churnCensusOf 只做形状校验（整数、induced <= fresh），从不把 fresh 与本轮自己实际上报的发现数对比——而该数据在组装时就在手。一个没有上报任何发现的轮次，只要拿着误计或被注入的 census（如 {fresh: 11, induced: 7}）加上恢复出的 streak 1，就能发出 REQUEST_CHANGES。廉价的确定性守卫是单边界限：fresh 超过本轮自报发现总数时视为无 census。反方向（{fresh: 0, induced: 0} 悄悄清零合法 streak）目前只有文字防御。
2. ledger.ts:145 — churn 字段在匿名恢复中存活（R1-13）。 persistRecoveredLedger 的匿名恢复分支（pr-context.ts）会丢弃 sha/commitId/posted/prevPosted（它们都是关于特定轮次的事实），但 churnRounds/fresh/induced 经由 ...kept 存活，被重新标注到赢得恢复的外部轮次上。该分支自身的理由同样适用于它们；参与决策的 churnRounds 可能因此提前一轮触发非收敛阻塞项——横跨一个本账号从未运行过的轮次。pr-context-persist.test.ts 中没有任何 churnRounds 断言。
3. SKILL.md:798 — fix-induced 规则缺少同条目上限。 规则把新缺陷以原条目的 id 再报，但没有条款处理「两个不同 fix-induced 缺陷追溯到同一条目」——两者都拿到同一 id，validateFindings（findings.ts:444）随后因重复 id 抛错，使整轮失败，恰恰发生在该规则针对的打转站点 PR 上。

我在被审 commit 上运行的验证：三个改动的测试套件通过（compose-review.test.ts + ledger.test.ts + findings.test.ts = 564，SKILL.test.ts = 26）；script-lint 干净（未改动可执行脚本）。Test Plan 提到的 run-ledger.test.ts 确实存在，位于 packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts；此前「文件不存在」的提示是路径解析问题（从 worktree 根目录而非 packages/cli 检查），并非缺陷。

结论：Request changes —— 第 1 轮的三个 Critical 均未处理且依然成立。

[doudouOUC]

⚠️ PR head 已漂移：本 review 启动时 head 为 e631d95d9b6ea782783b595ca525491d3954bc26，当前 head 为 78ae61567728750d5cfe2dffb9167618eea46dd1。原 inline 评论可能已失效，以下仅保留汇总。

两阶段 Review 结论：ISSUES_FOUND（一轮 PASS，二轮 qwen3.8-max 捕获漏检）

• Round 1（deepseek-v4-flash）：APPROVED，未发现问题。
• Round 2（qwen3.8-max）：独立复评后识别出 3 个 Critical 阻塞项，已发布 CHANGES_REQUESTED review（#4986706845）。

关键阻塞项（Critical）

1. R1-7 — census 未与本轮实际 filing 交叉校验（compose-review.ts:1194）
   churnCensusOf 仅校验形状，未把 fresh 与本轮实际 report 的 findings 做比对。一个零 finding 的轮次可以携带 {fresh: 11, induced: 7} 与 streak=1，最终 posting REQUEST_CHANGES；PR 自身的 filing test 已展示这种不一致（1 条 draft comment，census 却声称 11）。

2. R1-13 — churn 字段在 anonymous recovery 中错误存活（ledger.ts:145，机制位于未改动的 pr-context.ts:1157）
   anonymous-recovery 分支会丢弃 sha/commitId/posted/prevPosted 等 per-round 事实，但 churnRounds/fresh/induced 通过 ...kept 透传并被重新 dating；按该分支自己的 rationale，这些决策相关的计数字段同样应该被丢弃，否则 streak 可能提前一轮触发阻塞。

3. SKILL.md:798 — fix-induced duplicate id（findings.ts:444）
   规则允许把两个追溯到同一条原始 finding 的不同缺陷复用原始 id 上报，而 validateFindings 会对重复 id 抛出异常，导致整轮失败。

验证结果

• 测试：CLI 564/564 通过（compose-review / ledger / findings），Core 26/26 通过（SKILL.test.ts）。
• script-lint：clean。
• build-test：packages/audio-capture 本地 native build 因环境缺少 Python 失败，与本次改动无关。

链接

• PR：#9596
• Round 2 review：#9596 (review)

[doudouOUC]

⚠️ PR head 已漂移：本 review 启动时 head 为 e631d95d9b6ea782783b595ca525491d3954bc26，当前 head 为 78ae61567728750d5cfe2dffb9167618eea46dd1。原 inline 评论可能已失效，以下仅保留汇总。

两阶段 Review 结论：ISSUES_FOUND（一轮 PASS，二轮 qwen3.8-max 捕获漏检）

• Round 1（deepseek-v4-flash）：APPROVED，未发现问题。
• Round 2（qwen3.8-max）：独立复评后识别出 3 个 Critical 阻塞项，已发布 CHANGES_REQUESTED review（#4986706845）。

关键阻塞项（Critical）

1. R1-7 — census 未与本轮实际 filing 交叉校验（compose-review.ts:1194）
   churnCensusOf 仅校验形状，未把 fresh 与本轮实际 report 的 findings 做比对。一个零 finding 的轮次可以携带 {fresh: 11, induced: 7} 与 streak=1，最终 posting REQUEST_CHANGES；PR 自身的 filing test 已展示这种不一致（1 条 draft comment，census 却声称 11）。

2. R1-13 — churn 字段在 anonymous recovery 中错误存活（ledger.ts:145，机制位于未改动的 pr-context.ts:1157）
   anonymous-recovery 分支会丢弃 sha/commitId/posted/prevPosted 等 per-round 事实，但 churnRounds/fresh/induced 通过 ...kept 透传并被重新 dating；按该分支自己的 rationale，这些决策相关的计数字段同样应该被丢弃，否则 streak 可能提前一轮触发阻塞。

3. SKILL.md:798 — fix-induced duplicate id（findings.ts:444）
   规则允许把两个追溯到同一条原始 finding 的不同缺陷复用原始 id 上报，而 validateFindings 会对重复 id 抛出异常，导致整轮失败。

验证结果

• 测试：CLI 564/564 通过（compose-review / ledger / findings），Core 26/26 通过（SKILL.test.ts）。
• script-lint：clean。
• build-test：packages/audio-capture 本地 native build 因环境缺少 Python 失败，与本次改动无关。

链接

• PR：#9596
• Round 2 review：#9596 (review)

[doudouOUC]

⚠️ PR head 已漂移：本 review 启动时 head 为 e631d95d9b6ea782783b595ca525491d3954bc26，当前 head 为 78ae61567728750d5cfe2dffb9167618eea46dd1。原 inline 评论可能已失效，以下仅保留汇总。

两阶段 Review 结论：ISSUES_FOUND（一轮 PASS，二轮 qwen3.8-max 捕获漏检）

• Round 1（deepseek-v4-flash）：APPROVED，未发现问题。
• Round 2（qwen3.8-max）：独立复评后识别出 3 个 Critical 阻塞项，已发布 CHANGES_REQUESTED review（#4986706845）。

关键阻塞项（Critical）

1. R1-7 — census 未与本轮实际 filing 交叉校验（compose-review.ts:1194）
   churnCensusOf 仅校验形状，未把 fresh 与本轮实际 report 的 findings 做比对。一个零 finding 的轮次可以携带 {fresh: 11, induced: 7} 与 streak=1，最终 posting REQUEST_CHANGES；PR 自身的 filing test 已展示这种不一致（1 条 draft comment，census 却声称 11）。

2. R1-13 — churn 字段在 anonymous recovery 中错误存活（ledger.ts:145，机制位于未改动的 pr-context.ts:1157）
   anonymous-recovery 分支会丢弃 sha/commitId/posted/prevPosted 等 per-round 事实，但 churnRounds/fresh/induced 通过 ...kept 透传并被重新 dating；按该分支自己的 rationale，这些决策相关的计数字段同样应该被丢弃，否则 streak 可能提前一轮触发阻塞。

3. SKILL.md:798 — fix-induced duplicate id（findings.ts:444）
   规则允许把两个追溯到同一条原始 finding 的不同缺陷复用原始 id 上报，而 validateFindings 会对重复 id 抛出异常，导致整轮失败。

验证结果

• 测试：CLI 564/564 通过（compose-review / ledger / findings），Core 26/26 通过（SKILL.test.ts）。
• script-lint：clean。
• build-test：packages/audio-capture 本地 native build 因环境缺少 Python 失败，与本次改动无关。

链接

• PR：feat(review): ask each fix for its test, and rule on non-convergence #9596
• Round 2 review：feat(review): ask each fix for its test, and rule on non-convergence #9596 (review)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

Not reviewed: build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally (the unit suites covering the changed code ran green locally; the webui build failure that aborted Agent 7's harness is pre-existing on untouched files).

Not reviewed: reverse audit — did not converge within the reverse-audit round cap of 5.

Test Plan (not a blocker): src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory.

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

未审查：build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally (the unit suites covering the changed code ran green locally; the webui build failure that aborted Agent 7's harness is pre-existing on untouched files)。

未审查：反向审计——在 5 轮的反审轮数上限内未收敛。

Test Plan（非阻断）：src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Critical] R2-2: The churn-state strip this commit added lives only in the anonymous-advance branch — the identity-known write path (including a FOREIGN winner) and the anonymous-with-no-existing-file path still adopt a foreign marker's churnRounds/fresh/induced wholesale, because recoverLedger's seam strips only the anchor (stripAnchor removes just sha/model). Any account that can submit a review can therefore plant a streak: post a review whose ledger marker carries churnRounds: 4 at a round up to FOREIGN_ROUND_HEADROOM (64) past this account's own, let this account's pr-context recover it as the winner, and the account's next round needs only ONE honest above-bar census to reach churnRounds >= 2 — the module then files REQUEST_CHANGES with "This pull request is not converging … the 5th round counted against the churn bar" on the FIRST measurable round of a PR that never churned. That breaks the bound the diff itself documents for forged streaks — "one round early, and nothing else" — and the new round-trip test pins the whole-write only with an own-winner-shaped fixture, so the suite stays green. Strip the churn state at the recovery seam beside the anchor: a stripChurnState sibling of stripAnchor applied to foreign winners in recoverLedger (~line 937), so no write path can carry a foreign streak into the side file; the anonymous-advance drop then stays as defence in depth.

witness (probe, both arms at the reviewed commit):
PR arm:  own marker round 3/streak 1 + foreign marker round 4/churnRounds 4
         -> side file churnRounds=4 (foreign=true)
         -> compose over ONE honest census {fresh:10, induced:6}:
            event=REQUEST_CHANGES, body: "is not converging",
            "the 5th round counted against the churn bar"
FIX arm: stripChurnState at the seam -> side file churnRounds=undefined
         -> same compose: event=COMMENT, no blocker, churnRounds=1

中文说明

本次提交新增的 churn 状态剥离只存在于匿名推进分支——身份已知的写入路径（包括外部账号胜出的情形）以及「匿名且无既有 side file」的路径仍会原样采纳外部 marker 的 churnRounds/fresh/induced，因为 recoverLedger 的接缝只剥离锚点（stripAnchor 只移除 sha/model）。因此任何有权提交 review 的账号都可以植入连续计数：发布一条 ledger marker 携带 churnRounds: 4、轮次至多高出本账号 FOREIGN_ROUND_HEADROOM（64）的 review，让本账号的 pr-context 以胜出者身份恢复它，随后本账号只需一轮真实的越线普查即可使 churnRounds >= 2——模块会在一个从未打转的 PR 的首个可测量轮次就发出 REQUEST_CHANGES：「本 PR 不再收敛……第 5 个计入 churn bar 的轮次」。这打破了 diff 自己为伪造连续计数写明的边界——「最多提前一轮，别无其他」——且新增的往返测试只用「本账号胜出」形状的夹具钉住了整体写入，套件因此保持全绿。修复：在恢复接缝处与锚点一并剥离 churn 状态——在 recoverLedger（约 937 行）中对外部胜出者施加 stripAnchor 的同族 stripChurnState，使任何写入路径都无法把外部连续计数带进 side file；匿名推进分支的 drop 保留为纵深防御。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R1-1: Still standing from round 1 (deferred by the fix round; re-verified this round by mutation). The fix-witness mandate is pinned in SKILL.md by SKILL.test.ts, but this half — the FINDING_FORMAT actually embedded in every finder brief — is pinned by no test. Mutating it proves the gap: deleting the Fix witness line keeps 547/547 cli tests + 26/26 SKILL tests green, and deleting the owes-a-test paragraph below stays green too. A future edit dropping either ships with the whole suite green while launched finders stop being asked for the criterion and Step 7's posting rule goes inert on every agent-built round. Pin it through a built prompt in agent-prompt.test.ts — e.g. expect(buildRoleBrief(plan, '1a')).toContain('**Fix witness:** <the test that must go RED if that fix is removed') plus '**This field never gates reporting**' so the exemption half is pinned too; the suggested pin reds under both mutants.

中文说明

第 1 轮遗留（修复轮次延迟处理；本轮已用变异重新验证）。fix-witness 要求在 SKILL.md 一侧由 SKILL.test.ts 钉住，但这一半——真正嵌入每个 finder 简报的 FINDING_FORMAT——没有任何测试钉住。变异证明缺口：删除 Fix witness 行，547/547 cli 测试 + 26/26 SKILL 测试全绿；删除下方的「修复欠一个测试」段落同样全绿。未来任何删除二者的改动都会在整个套件全绿的情况下上线，届时启动的 finder 不再被要求给出验收标准，Step 7 的发布规则在每个由 agent 构建的轮次中失效。请在 agent-prompt.test.ts 中通过构建出的简报钉住它——例如 expect(buildRoleBrief(plan, '1a')).toContain('**Fix witness:** <the test that must go RED if that fix is removed')，外加 '**This field never gates reporting**' 把豁免半句也钉住；所建议的钉子在上述两个变异下均会变红。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R1-5: Still standing from round 1 (deferred by the fix round; re-derived independently by three agents this round). This line enumerates Fix witness in Step 4's aggregated format, but the Step 4 "Pattern aggregation" template it points at (lines 651-659 at this commit, untouched by this diff) still defines File, Anchors, Pattern, Occurrences, Example, Failure scenario, Witness, Suggested fix, Severity — no Fix witness slot. A pattern-aggregated finding whose fix adds a guard is formatted per that template, carries no fixWitness in the artifact, and Step 7's rule fires only when fixWitness is present and not N/A — so every comment of the expanded aggregate ships without the acceptance criterion, silently defeating this PR's own "the line reaches every fixer" property for exactly the aggregated shape. Add a - **Fix witness:** <the group's shared acceptance criterion — the test that must go red if the general fix is removed, or N/A> line to Step 4's Format list after Suggested fix: — or remove Fix witness, from this parenthetical if aggregates deliberately carry no criterion.

中文说明

第 1 轮遗留（修复轮次延迟处理；本轮被三个 agent 独立重新发现）。此行把 Fix witness 列入 Step 4 的聚合格式，但它所指向的 Step 4「Pattern aggregation」模板（本提交时的 651-659 行，本 diff 未触及）仍只定义 File、Anchors、Pattern、Occurrences、Example、Failure scenario、Witness、Suggested fix、Severity——没有 Fix witness 槽位。一个修复新增 guard 的模式聚合 finding 会按该模板成形，artifact 中不携带 fixWitness，而 Step 7 的规则只在 fixWitness 存在且不为 N/A 时才触发——于是聚合展开后的每条评论都不带验收标准，恰恰在这种聚合形态上悄悄落空了本 PR 自己「该行触达每个修复者」的性质。请在 Step 4 的 Format 列表中 Suggested fix: 之后补一行 - **Fix witness:** <该组的共同验收标准——通用修复被移除后必须变红的测试，或 N/A>——或者，若聚合刻意不携带验收标准，则从本句括号中删去 Fix witness, 。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R2-1: The cross-check's three-channel sum is pinned only for the draftedComments term. The suite exercises it with all other channels empty; mutations deleting the bodyCriticals term or the deferredSuggestions term each leave 395/395 tests green (control: deleting the draftedComments term reds 7, so the harness is alive). If either term were silently dropped, a round reporting its first-appearing findings through body Criticals or deferrals (fresh: 5 with five such reports) would trip 5 > 0, the census would be refused, and the streak carried instead of reset — a genuinely churning PR's blocker arriving one round early, caused by the module itself. Add boundary arms to the convergence describe block: a round reporting through deferredSuggestions (or bodyCriticals) with fresh exactly equal to that count is accepted (below bar → streak resets), and one with fresh one past it is refused (streak carries) — pinning both terms on both sides of the bound.

witness (probe):
mutant A (drop bodyCriticals term):      395 passed (395)
mutant B (drop deferredSuggestions term): 395 passed (395)
control C (drop draftedComments term):    7 failed | 388 passed
suggested arms: green on pristine; RED under A and B
  (AssertionError: expected 1 to be undefined — census refused,
   streak carried instead of reset)

中文说明

交叉校验的三通道求和只为 draftedComments 一项所钉住。测试套件在其余通道全空的情况下检验它；删除 bodyCriticals 项或删除 deferredSuggestions 项的变异各自保持 395/395 全绿（对照：删除 draftedComments 项使 7 个测试变红，说明装置有效）。若其中任一项被悄悄删掉，一个通过 body Criticals 或延迟列表上报首发 finding 的轮次（fresh: 5 且恰好五个此类上报）会触发 5 > 0，普查被拒绝，连续计数被携带而非清零——一个真正打转的 PR 的阻塞项将提前一轮到来，而肇因是模块自身。请在 convergence describe 块中补充边界分支：一个通过 deferredSuggestions（或 bodyCriticals）上报、fresh 恰好等于该数量的轮次被接受（低于门槛 → 连续计数清零），而 fresh 多出一的轮次被拒绝（连续计数携带）——在边界两侧同时钉住这两项。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R2-3: A below-minimum census (fresh < CHURN_MIN_FRESH — accepted by churnCensusOf, false from aboveChurnBar) falls into this ternary's reset branch and is treated as "measured converging", contradicting the diff's own docstrings: CHURN_MIN_FRESH says of sub-4 rounds "A ratio over two or three findings is not a trend, it is rounding … which is what the minimum exists to refuse", and Ledger.churnRounds says "a round that could not measure carries the count without adding to it". Two concrete costs: round N above the bar (streak 1) followed by round N+1 at fresh=3/induced=3 — 100% fix-induced, but three findings — wipes the streak to 0 instead of carrying it; and a PR alternating above-bar rounds with below-minimum rounds never reaches CHURN_STREAK_TO_FILE, so the blocker never fires on exactly that looping shape. No test pins either behaviour. Carry sub-minimum censuses like an absent one — or, if reset is the intended semantics for small rounds, reconcile the two docstrings and pin the reset with a test.

Suggested change

	const churnRounds = churnAbove
	? Math.min(prevFacts.churnRounds + 1, LEDGER_MAX_ROUND)
	: churnCensus === null
	const churnRounds = churnAbove
	? Math.min(prevFacts.churnRounds + 1, LEDGER_MAX_ROUND)
	: churnCensus === null || churnCensus.fresh < CHURN_MIN_FRESH
	? prevFacts.churnRounds
	: 0;

witness (probe): prev {round: 3, churnRounds: 1} + census {fresh: 3, induced: 3}
-> marker churnRounds omitted (reset to 0); with the carry fix the probe
flips to churnRounds=1 (carried). All 577 tests pass with the reset untested.
Fix witness owed: an arm asserting the carried streak reds under the reset.

中文说明

低于最小值的普查（fresh < CHURN_MIN_FRESH——被 churnCensusOf 接受、aboveChurnBar 返回 false）落进该三元表达式的清零分支，被当作「测得已收敛」，与 diff 自己的文档矛盾：CHURN_MIN_FRESH 对低于四的轮次写道「两三个发现上的比例不是趋势，是取整……这正是该最小值存在所要拒绝的」，而 Ledger.churnRounds 写道「无法测量的轮次原样携带计数而不增加它」。两个具体代价：第 N 轮越线（连续计数 1）后第 N+1 轮 fresh=3/induced=3——100% 由修复引入，但只有三个发现——把连续计数清零而非携带；一个越线轮与低于最小值轮交替出现的 PR 永远到不了 CHURN_STREAK_TO_FILE，于是阻塞项在这种恰是它针对的打转形态上永不触发。两种行为均无测试钉住。请把低于最小值的普查视同缺省携带——或者，若小轮次清零是有意语义，请调和两处文档并用测试钉住清零。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R2-4: The census's domain is defined twice, and the two definitions disagree. SKILL Step 6's enumeration (SKILL.md:811) counts fresh as "the ones that took a new R<round>-<n> id, plus the fix-induced ones that took a previous id"; this cross-check's premise comment counts inline drafts, body Criticals and deferrals. The check is one-sided (refuses only over-counting), so both mismatch directions ride through. Direction 1 — SKILL counts channels the denominator misses: low-confidence terminal-only findings and unanchorable discarded suggestions take R ids in Step 6's accounting but ride none of the three channels, so a faithful census (fresh = 3 posted + 1 terminal-only) is refused (4 > 3), the streak carried instead of advanced — one low-confidence fresh finding per round permanently disarms the blocker, and the refusal also withholds resets. Direction 2 — the denominator counts a channel SKILL omits: deferred findings take D<round>-<n> ids, so a literal-following model undercounts fresh: probed with identical reports (3 drafted + 2 deferred, prev streak 1, critical floor) — the true census {fresh: 5, induced: 3} files REQUEST_CHANGES with streak 2; the literal enumeration {fresh: 3, induced: 1} reads below-minimum, RESETS the streak and flips the event to APPROVE (the {fresh: 4, induced: 3} sibling overstates the ratio and advances on a below-bar reality). One alignment decision closes both directions: amend SKILL Step 6 to define fresh over the findings the round reports through the three channels (terminal-only excluded, deferrals included) — the module's comment already asserts that domain, so aligning the skill upward is the consistent direction — or align the denominator with SKILL's domain and fix the premise comment.

中文说明

普查的定义出现了两次，且两者不一致。SKILL Step 6 的枚举（SKILL.md:811）把 fresh 计为「取得新的 R<round>-<n> id 的那些，加上取得先前 id 的 fix-induced 那些」；本交叉校验的前提注释则计行内草稿、正文 Critical 与延迟项三者。校验是单边的（只拒绝多报），因此两个失配方向都能通行。方向一——SKILL 计入了分母遗漏的通道：低置信度仅终端可见的 finding 与无法锚定被丢弃的 suggestion 在 Step 6 的口径下取得 R id，却不走三个通道中的任何一个，于是如实上报的普查（fresh = 3 已发布 + 1 仅终端）被拒绝（4 > 3），连续计数被携带而非推进——每轮只要有一个低置信度新 finding 就能永久解除阻塞项，且拒绝同时扣下了清零。方向二——分母计入了 SKILL 遗漏的通道：被延迟的 finding 取得 D<round>-<n> id，照字面执行的模型会少报 fresh：已用探针验证——相同上报（3 条草稿 + 2 条延迟，前轮连续计数 1，critical 底线）下，真实普查 {fresh: 5, induced: 3} 以连续计数 2 发出 REQUEST_CHANGES；照枚举字面的 {fresh: 3, induced: 1} 被判低于最小值，清零连续计数并把事件翻转为 APPROVE（同族的 {fresh: 4, induced: 3} 则会夸大比例、在低于门槛的现实中推进）。一次对齐决策可同时关闭两个方向：修订 SKILL Step 6，把 fresh 定义在本轮经三个通道上报的 finding 上（仅终端者除外、延迟者计入）——模块注释已声明该口径，向上对齐 SKILL 是一致的方向——或者让分母对齐 SKILL 的口径并修正前提注释。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R2-6: The cross-check has no round-aware arm: at prevRound === 0 a census is accepted and arms the streak although round 1 has no predecessor whose fixes could have induced anything — the same impossible-census class churnCensusOf already refuses for induced > fresh, and the same round-1 reasoning prevLedgerFacts applies to recovered streaks ("a streak attributed to round 0 would arm the non-convergence rule on a round-1 review that has no predecessor to have churned against"). A model-written {fresh: 11, induced: 7} on round 1 is shape-valid, passes the report-bound check, trips the bar, and the round-1 marker ships churnRounds: 1 — the existing round-1 test pins exactly that value as a consequence, not as an argued behaviour. The next round's honest above-bar census then advances the streak to 2 and files the blocker one round early, asserting "in every counted round at least half of its first-appearing findings were introduced by the previous round's fixes" — a clause that cannot be true of round 1. Refuse the census when prevRound === 0, symmetric with the round-0 streak guard, and update the round-1 test arm; a legitimate round-1 census can only carry induced = 0, which never trips the bar, so refusing it changes no verdict.

Suggested change

	const readCensus = churnCensusOf(input.convergence);
	const readCensus = prevRound === 0 ? null : churnCensusOf(input.convergence);

witness (probe):
BASE: round1 {churnRounds:1, fresh:11, induced:7, event:APPROVE}
   -> round2 {churnRounds:2, blocker:true, event:REQUEST_CHANGES,
      "the 2nd round counted"}
FLIP (prevRound===0 -> null): round1 {event:APPROVE}
   -> round2 {churnRounds:1, blocker:false, event:APPROVE}

中文说明

交叉校验没有按轮次设防的分支：在 prevRound === 0 时普查被接受并让连续计数开始累计，尽管第 1 轮不存在任何「其修复可能诱发问题」的前一轮——这与 churnCensusOf 已为 induced > fresh 拒绝的「不可能普查」同类，也正是 prevLedgerFacts 对恢复出的连续计数施加的第 1 轮推理（「归因于第 0 轮的连续计数会让一次没有前轮可供打转的第 1 轮 review 武装不收敛规则」）。模型在第 1 轮写下 {fresh: 11, induced: 7} 时形状合法、通过上报总量校验、越过门槛，第 1 轮的 marker 便携带 churnRounds: 1——现有第 1 轮测试恰好把这个值作为结果钉住，而非作为被论证的行为。下一轮真实的越线普查随即把连续计数推进到 2，提前一轮发出阻塞项，声称「在每个计入的轮次中，至少一半首发 finding 由上一轮的修复引入」——这句话对第 1 轮不可能为真。请在 prevRound === 0 时拒绝普查，与第 0 轮连续计数守卫保持对称，并更新第 1 轮测试分支；合法的第 1 轮普查只可能携带 induced = 0，永远不会越过门槛，因此拒绝它不改变任何裁决。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 2/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 2/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Address-review round summary — PR #9596 (round at 78ae6156)

All seven inline findings are resolved in code (one commit: 0accb99564), each verified by reproduction before the fix and by a mutation probe after it. No conflicts (--conflict false; origin/main not merged).

Review bodies

[rv:4986706845] (@doudouOUC, CHANGES_REQUESTED at e631d95) — the three round-1 Criticals it re-affirmed were checked against the current head:

1. R1-7 (census never cross-checked) — addressed by 78ae6156 (the one-sided report-bound cross-check in composeReview), which postdates that review; this round hardens it further per R2-1/R2-3/R2-4/R2-6 below.
2. R1-13 (churn fields survive recovery) — the anonymous-advance branch was fixed by 78ae6156; the remaining gap (the recovery seam adopting a foreign winner's churn state wholesale) is exactly this round's Critical, R2-2, now fixed.
3. fix-induced duplicate id (SKILL.md:798) — addressed by 78ae6156 ("one re-report per original id per round", pinned by SKILL.test.ts).

The bot summary reviews (rv:4986746232, rv:4986774853, ic:5360965417) duplicate the same three items; rv:4987582973 is a disclosed-partial-review note (no actionable items; its Test Plan path note was already resolved — run-ledger.test.ts exists at packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts).

Inline findings

id	finding	decision
[rc:3825530667] R2-2 (Critical)	foreign winner's churn state crosses the recovery seam	Resolved
[rc:3825530680] R1-1	FINDING_FORMAT fix-witness unpinned in finder briefs	Resolved
[rc:3825530685] R1-5	Step 4 aggregate template lacks a Fix witness slot	Resolved
[rc:3825530690] R2-1	three-channel sum pinned only for drafted comments	Resolved
[rc:3825530695] R2-3	below-minimum census resets instead of carrying	Resolved
[rc:3825530707] R2-4	census domain defined twice, disagreeing	Resolved
[rc:3825530711] R2-6	census accepted on round 1	Resolved

R2-2 — strip churn state at the recovery seam (Critical)

Reproduced first: own marker round 3/streak 1 + foreign marker round 4/churnRounds: 4 → side file carried churnRounds=4 → one honest above-bar census later, compose-review filed REQUEST_CHANGES on a PR that never churned (two failing tests written on the pre-fix code). Fix: stripChurnState, a sibling of stripAnchor, applied to foreign winners in recoverLedger — no write path (identity-known foreign winner, anonymous winner) can carry a foreign streak into the side file; the anonymous-advance drop stays as defence in depth. The work list, round counter and age reference still cross; own-account churn state round-trips (pinned both directions). The Ledger.churnRounds docstring's forged-streak bound is reworded to the now-true property.

R2-3 — below-minimum censuses carry like absent ones

Reproduced: prev streak 1 + census {fresh: 3, induced: 3} reset the streak, so a PR alternating above-bar rounds with sub-minimum rounds never reached the filing bar. Fix: churnCensus.fresh < CHURN_MIN_FRESH now carries the count, matching both docstrings ("a round that could not measure carries the count"). The filing condition's own comment mandated the consequence: the explicit churnAbove && guard is revived, so a carried streak beside a three-finding census cannot file — pinned by a dedicated arm that reds with the guard deleted.

R2-6 — round 1 refuses a census

Reproduced: a shape-valid {fresh: 11, induced: 7} on round 1 armed streak 1, and an honest above-bar round 2 then filed the blocker one round early. Fix: readCensus = prevRound === 0 ? null : …, symmetric with the round-0 streak guard; the round-1 test arm updated (it previously pinned churnRounds: 1 as a consequence) plus a round-2 follow-up arm proving legitimate arming still works.

R2-1 — pin the three-channel sum on both non-drafted channels

Boundary arms added: a round reporting its whole census through body Criticals (equality → accepted, below bar → streak resets) and through deferrals (equality → reset; one past → refused, streak carries). Both terms red under deletion mutants (verified).

R2-4 — one census domain

SKILL Step 6's fresh enumeration now matches the module's cross-check domain: counted over the three reporting channels (drafted inline comments, body Criticals, deferrals — deferrals included despite their D<round>-<n> ids; terminal-only low-confidence findings and unanchorable discarded drafts excluded). This closes both mismatch directions the finding probed.

R1-5 / R1-1 — fix-witness reach

Step 4's pattern-aggregation template gains the Fix witness slot Step 6 already names, and both halves (the format line and the This field never gates reporting exemption) are now pinned through a BUILT finder brief in agent-prompt.test.ts, plus the aggregate slot in SKILL.test.ts. All three pins red under deletion mutants (verified).

Mutation probes (each restored to green afterwards)

• stripChurnState call removed → 2 tests red
• below-minimum carry reverted to reset → 3 tests red (carry arm, guard arm, alternating loop)
• churnAbove && guard removed → 1 test red
• round-1 refusal removed → 1 test red
• bodyCriticals term dropped from the sum → 1 test red; deferredSuggestions term dropped → 1 test red
• Fix witness line deleted from FINDING_FORMAT → 1 test red; exemption clause deleted → 1 test red
• aggregate Fix witness slot deleted from SKILL.md → 1 test red

Verification

• npm run build — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed
• npm run lint — passed
• npx prettier --check on all changed files — passed (after --write on two)
• vitest packages/cli: compose-review.test.ts + pr-context.test.ts + pr-context-persist.test.ts + lib/ledger.test.ts + agent-prompt.test.ts + utils/findings.test.ts — 976 passed (6 files)
• vitest packages/cli full review scope: src/commands/review/ + utils/findings.test.ts — 4208 passed, 4 skipped (92 files)
• vitest packages/core: SKILL.test.ts — 26 passed
• Integration tests: not run — the changed behavior (recovery seam, compose arithmetic, skill text) is exercised by the unit suites above, not only through the bundled CLI; no settings source changed, so no schema regeneration.
• Pre-fix reproduction: 6 tests failed on the pre-round code (2 seam/round-trip, 3 below-minimum, 1 round-1), all green post-fix.

中文说明

处理 review 轮次总结 — PR #9596（基于 78ae6156 的一轮）

全部七条 inline 发现均已在代码中解决（单个提交：0accb99564），每一条都先复现、后修复，并经过变异探针验证。无冲突（--conflict false；未合并 origin/main）。

Review 正文

[rv:4986706845]（@doudouOUC，针对 e631d95 的 CHANGES_REQUESTED）——其重新确认的三个第 1 轮 Critical 已对照当前 head 核查：

1. R1-7（census 从未交叉校验）——已由 78ae6156（composeReview 中的单边界限 report-bound 交叉校验）处理，该提交晚于该 review；本轮又按下方 R2-1/R2-3/R2-4/R2-6 进一步加固。
2. R1-13（churn 字段在恢复中存活）——匿名推进分支已由 78ae6156 修复；剩余缺口（恢复接缝原样采纳外部胜出者的 churn 状态）正是本轮的 Critical R2-2，现已修复。
3. fix-induced 重复 id（SKILL.md:798）——已由 78ae6156 处理（「每轮每个原始 id 至多一次再报」，由 SKILL.test.ts 钉住）。

机器人汇总 review（rv:4986746232、rv:4986774853、ic:5360965417）重复同样三项；rv:4987582973 是部分审查的披露说明（无可操作项；其 Test Plan 路径问题已解决——run-ledger.test.ts 位于 packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts）。

Inline 发现

id	发现	决定
[rc:3825530667] R2-2（Critical）	外部胜出者的 churn 状态穿过恢复接缝	已解决
[rc:3825530680] R1-1	finder 简报中 FINDING_FORMAT 的 fix-witness 未被钉住	已解决
[rc:3825530685] R1-5	Step 4 聚合模板缺少 Fix witness 槽位	已解决
[rc:3825530690] R2-1	三通道求和只为 drafted comments 一项钉住	已解决
[rc:3825530695] R2-3	低于最小值的普查被清零而非携带	已解决
[rc:3825530707] R2-4	census 口径双重定义且互不一致	已解决
[rc:3825530711] R2-6	第 1 轮接受普查	已解决

R2-2 — 在恢复接缝剥离 churn 状态（Critical）

先复现：本账号 marker 第 3 轮/streak 1 + 外部 marker 第 4 轮/churnRounds: 4 → side file 携带 churnRounds=4 → 只需一轮真实的越线普查，compose-review 就在一个从未打转的 PR 上发出 REQUEST_CHANGES（在修复前代码上写出两个失败测试）。修复：stripChurnState，stripAnchor 的同族函数，在 recoverLedger 中施加于外部胜出者——任何写入路径（身份已知的外部胜出者、匿名胜出者）都无法把外部 streak 带进 side file；匿名推进分支的 drop 保留为纵深防御。工作清单、轮次计数器与年龄参照仍然跨界；本账号的 churn 状态双向往返（两个方向均钉住）。Ledger.churnRounds 文档中伪造 streak 的边界被改写为现已成立的性质。

R2-3 — 低于最小值的普查视同缺省携带

复现：前轮 streak 1 + 普查 {fresh: 3, induced: 3} 会清零 streak，于是越线轮与低于最小值轮交替出现的 PR 永远到不了 filing bar。修复：churnCensus.fresh < CHURN_MIN_FRESH 时原样携带计数，与两处文档一致（「无法测量的轮次原样携带计数」）。filing 条件自身的注释规定了相应后果：显式 churnAbove && 守卫被复活，因此携带出的 streak 搭配三 finding 普查不会 filing——由一个删除守卫即变红的专门分支钉住。

R2-6 — 第 1 轮拒绝普查

复现：第 1 轮一个形状合法的 {fresh: 11, induced: 7} 会让 streak 武装到 1，随后真实的越线第 2 轮就提前一轮发出阻塞项。修复：readCensus = prevRound === 0 ? null : …，与第 0 轮 streak 守卫对称；第 1 轮测试分支更新（此前把 churnRounds: 1 作为结果钉住），并补充第 2 轮后续分支证明合法武装仍然有效。

R2-1 — 在两个非草稿通道上钉住三通道求和

补充边界分支：一个整份普查经由 body Criticals 上报的轮次（相等 → 接受，低于门槛 → streak 清零）与经由延迟列表上报的轮次（相等 → 清零；多一 → 拒绝，streak 携带）。两项在删除变异下均变红（已验证）。

R2-4 — 唯一的 census 口径

SKILL Step 6 的 fresh 枚举现在与模块交叉校验的口径一致：按三个上报通道计数（行内草稿评论、正文 Criticals、延迟项——延迟项虽取 D<round>-<n> id 仍计入；仅终端可见的低置信度 finding 与无法锚定被丢弃的草稿不计入）。这关闭了该发现探针验证过的两个失配方向。

R1-5 / R1-1 — fix-witness 的触达

Step 4 的模式聚合模板补上 Step 6 已经点名的 Fix witness 槽位；两半（格式行与 This field never gates reporting 豁免句）现在通过 agent-prompt.test.ts 中构建出的 finder 简报钉住，聚合槽位由 SKILL.test.ts 钉住。三颗钉在删除变异下均变红（已验证）。

变异探针（每个事后均恢复为绿）

• 删除 stripChurnState 调用 → 2 个测试变红
• 低于最小值携带还原为零清 → 3 个测试变红（携带分支、守卫分支、交替循环）
• 删除 churnAbove && 守卫 → 1 个测试变红
• 删除第 1 轮拒绝 → 1 个测试变红
• 从求和中删除 bodyCriticals 项 → 1 个测试变红；删除 deferredSuggestions 项 → 1 个测试变红
• 从 FINDING_FORMAT 删除 Fix witness 行 → 1 个测试变红；删除豁免句 → 1 个测试变红
• 从 SKILL.md 删除聚合 Fix witness 槽位 → 1 个测试变红

验证

• npm run build — 通过
• npm run typecheck — 通过
• npm run lint — 通过
• 对全部改动文件 npx prettier --check — 通过（其中两个文件先经 --write）
• vitest packages/cli：compose-review.test.ts + pr-context.test.ts + pr-context-persist.test.ts + lib/ledger.test.ts + agent-prompt.test.ts + utils/findings.test.ts — 976 通过（6 个文件）
• vitest packages/cli review 全量：src/commands/review/ + utils/findings.test.ts — 4208 通过、4 跳过（92 个文件）
• vitest packages/core：SKILL.test.ts — 26 通过
• 集成测试：未运行——改动的行为（恢复接缝、compose 算术、skill 文本）由上述单元套件覆盖，并非只能经由打包 CLI 验证；未改动 settings 源，无需重新生成 schema。
• 修复前复现：6 个测试在轮次前代码上失败（2 个接缝/往返、3 个低于最小值、1 个第 1 轮），修复后全部转绿。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed. Suggestions are inline.

Not reviewed: build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally.

Test Plan (not a blocker): src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 3, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts:676 — [review] three-halves test's N/A exemption pinned by no assertion
• packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:607 — [review] no seam-level pass-through witness for the convergence input
• packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.md:909 — [review] fixWitness artifact-schema enumeration unpinned
• packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:2119 — [review] blocker's deterministic classification in the softening subtraction unpinned
• packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.md:808 — [review] weaker-defect case has no induced counting rule
• packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.md:799 — [review] fix-induced re-report imports still-stands' severity rule
• packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts:690 — [review] disposition directive 'under the original id' pinned by no assertion
• packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts:716 — [review] census test's counting and module-owns clauses pinned by no assertion
• packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts:151 — [review] recovery-THREW churn keep side pinned by no test
• packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.md:799 — [review] fix-induced disposition has no deferral-posture carve-out
• packages/cli/src/utils/findings.test.ts:2043 — [review] fixWitness round-trip pins only the string tail (toContain vs toBe)

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。 建议见行内评论。

未审查：build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally。

Test Plan（非阻断）：src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory。

收敛姿态下延后（第 3 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 11 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R3-1: This weld test pins only the prefix of the Fix-witness format line. The N/A exemption tail added at agent-prompt.ts:220 — or "N/A" when the fix adds no guard, branch or behaviour a test can pin — is pinned by no assertion, although the test's own comment claims to pin the exemption. Trimming the tail while keeping the prefix and the never-gates paragraph ships green: probed at the reviewed commit, the tail-trim mutant leaves 275/275 passing. Every finder brief would then define the field with no N/A option at its declaration site, nudging finders into fabricating witnesses for fixes that are a rename, a comment, or a type-only change. Pin the tail through the built brief.

Suggested change

	expect(brief).toContain(
	'**Fix witness:** <the test that must go RED if that fix is removed',
	);
	expect(brief).toContain(
	'**Fix witness:** <the test that must go RED if that fix is removed',
	);
	expect(brief).toContain(
	'or "N/A" when the fix adds no guard, branch or behaviour a test can pin',
	);

中文说明

该焊接测试只钉住了 Fix-witness 格式行的前缀。agent-prompt.ts:220 新增的 N/A 豁免尾句——or "N/A" when the fix adds no guard, branch or behaviour a test can pin——没有任何断言覆盖，尽管测试注释声称钉住了该豁免。在保留前缀与 never-gates 段落的前提下剪掉尾句可以绿色合入：已在被审 commit 上用探针验证，删除尾句的变异体 275/275 全部通过。此后每个 finder brief 都将在字段声明处缺少 N/A 选项，诱导 finder 为仅是重命名、注释或纯类型改动的修复编造 witness。请通过构建出的 brief 钉住该尾句。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R3-2: The three-channel denominator's additive composition is pinned by no arm. Every census test in this block populates at most one reporting channel at a time, so any non-additive reduction of the sum at compose-review.ts:1202-1207 — e.g. Math.max(drafted, body, deferred) — ships green (probed: the max mutant keeps all 399 tests passing) while behaving differently exactly when two channels are populated together, which is the ordinary shape of a round with body blockers beside inline findings. Such a round — 6 drafted comments + 3 body Criticals, census {fresh: 9, induced: 5} — reads the denominator as 6 under the mutant, trips fresh > reported, and the census is refused: the streak carries instead of advancing, so the blocker arrives a round late; with induced: 2 it carries instead of resetting, leaving a legitimate streak standing. Add an arm reporting one census through two channels at once — convergence: {fresh: 4, induced: 1} with 2 drafted comments + 2 bodyCriticals, equality across the COMBINED channels accepted and resetting the streak. The equality arm is the discriminator; a one-past variant pins the boundary but does not red the max mutant.

中文说明

三通道分母的「加法」组合没有任何测试分支钉住。本块中所有 census 测试每次至多只填充一个上报通道，因此 compose-review.ts:1202-1207 处求和的任何非加法归约——例如 Math.max(drafted, body, deferred)——都能绿色合入（探针验证：max 变异体下全部 399 个测试通过），而恰在两个通道同时有上报时行为不同——这正是「行内 finding 之外还有正文阻塞项」的轮次的常见形态。这样的轮次——6 条草稿评论 + 3 条正文 Critical，census {fresh: 9, induced: 5}——在变异体下分母被读成 6，触发 fresh > reported，普查被拒绝：连续计数被携带而非推进，阻塞项晚一轮到来；若 induced: 2，则被携带而非清零，使一个正当的连续计数悬而不决。请补一个「同一 census 经两个通道同时上报」的分支——2 条草稿评论 + 2 条 bodyCriticals 下 convergence: {fresh: 4, induced: 1}，组合通道恰好相等应被接受并清零连续计数。相等分支才是判别器；多出一的分支只钉边界，不会让 max 变异体变红。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R3-3: This sentence contradicts the module this PR ships. compose-review.ts implements three states — above-bar advances, churnCensus === null || churnCensus.fresh < CHURN_MIN_FRESH carries, a measured below-bar census resets — and volumeOf accepts 0 on purpose. So {"fresh": 0, "induced": 0} lands in the carry branch exactly as absence does, and a genuinely converged small round (fresh 1-3) carries rather than resets: nothing "erases a standing claim". The PR's own test "CARRIES the streak through a below-minimum census" pins the carry, and a probe mutant implementing the prose semantics flips the outcome. The cost runs both ways: the blocker can file one round earlier than this contract says, and an editor aligning code to prose would reintroduce the sub-minimum reset the carry comment and the carry test exist to forbid. Reword to match the module: absence, a malformed pair, and a too-small census (fewer than 4 fresh, zeros included) all carry the streak untouched; only a measured below-bar census with at least 4 fresh resets it. Omit the field anyway — absence is the honest signal.

中文说明

本句与本 PR 交付的模块相矛盾。compose-review.ts 实现三种状态——越过门槛则推进、churnCensus === null || churnCensus.fresh < CHURN_MIN_FRESH 则携带、测得低于门槛才清零——且 volumeOf 刻意接受 0。因此 {"fresh": 0, "induced": 0} 与缺省一样落入携带分支，真正收敛的小轮次（fresh 1-3）也是携带而非清零：不存在「抹去已成立声明」的输入。本 PR 自己的测试「CARRIES the streak through a below-minimum census」钉住了携带行为，实现该 prose 语义的探针变异体会翻转结果。代价是双向的：阻塞项可能比本契约所述提前一轮发出；而把代码对齐到 prose 的编辑者会重新引入携带注释与携带测试所禁止的低于最小值清零。请改写为与模块一致：缺省、非法对、以及过小的普查（fresh 少于 4，含零）都原样携带连续计数；只有测得低于门槛且 fresh 至少为 4 的普查才清零。无论如何都应省略该字段——缺省才是诚实的信号。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R3-4: Same defect as R3-3, second location — the same contradiction in the compose-state bullet — zeros written for an unmeasured round do not "silently retire" the standing claim. churnCensusOf accepts zeros (volumeOf: "Zero survives on purpose") and the streak ternary carries them exactly as absence (fresh < CHURN_MIN_FRESH carry branch, pinned by the below-minimum carry test). The only input that resets the streak is a measured below-bar census with at least 4 fresh. Align this bullet with the module the same way as the Step 6 paragraph, and keep the omission instruction — it is still the honest signal, just not for the reason stated.

中文说明

compose-state 条目中的同一矛盾——为未测量轮次写入零并不会「悄悄撤销」已成立的不收敛声明。churnCensusOf 接受零（volumeOf：「Zero survives on purpose」），连续计数三元表达式对零的处理与缺省完全相同（fresh < CHURN_MIN_FRESH 携带分支，已由低于最小值携带测试钉住）。唯一能清零连续计数的输入是 fresh 至少为 4 且测得低于门槛的普查。请像 Step 6 段落一样把本条目对齐到模块，并保留「省略字段」的指示——它仍是诚实的信号，只是理由并非此处所述。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R3-5: This gloss contradicts the spent-id guardrail above it. When two distinct defects trace to the same previous entry, the second IS one "you traced to the change that answered a previous entry" — so this appositive counts it in induced — while the guardrail says "Count the second in fresh but not induced". An agent following the gloss over-counts induced by one, and because the bar is induced * 2 >= fresh, at fresh=4 the correct induced=1 resets the streak (2 < 4) while the over-counted induced=2 advances it (4 >= 4) — flipping the outcome that feeds the non-convergence blocker. Align the gloss with the guardrail, e.g. "…the fix-induced rule above attributed: the ones that took a previous entry's id (the spent-id second defect of the guardrail above counts in fresh only)".

中文说明

该 gloss 与其上方的 spent-id 护栏矛盾。当两个不同的缺陷追溯到同一条先前条目时，第二个缺陷恰恰属于「你追溯到回应先前条目的那次改动」的情形——因此这个同位语把它计入 induced——而护栏明确写道「把第二个计入 fresh 但不计入 induced」。遵循 gloss 的 agent 会把 induced 多计一个；由于门槛是 induced * 2 >= fresh，在 fresh=4 时正确的 induced=1 会清零连续计数（2 < 4），多计的 induced=2 却推进它（4 >= 4）——翻转了喂给非收敛阻塞项的结果。请把 gloss 对齐到护栏，例如「……fix-induced 规则归因的那些：取得了先前条目 id 的那些（上方护栏中 spent-id 的第二个缺陷只计入 fresh）」。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R3-6: "so the count and the report cannot disagree" overclaims what the module enforces. compose-review.ts refuses only readCensus.fresh > reportedThisRound — its own comment calls it "the module's one-sided cross-check" — and accepts any under-count. Probed at the reviewed commit: the same round reporting 9 findings resets the streak with the true census {fresh: 9, induced: 4} (8 >= 9 false → APPROVE), while an under-counted {fresh: 4, induced: 4} passes the check, advances the streak and files the non-convergence blocker (REQUEST_CHANGES) on a round that was actually converging. The over-count direction is pinned by tests; the under-count direction is pinned by nothing, and this clause discourages anyone from adding the bound. State the check as it is — a fresh larger than everything reported is refused as no census at all; accuracy below that ceiling is the agent's alone to keep — or add a symmetric guard if that guarantee is intended.

中文说明

「因此计数与上报不可能不一致」夸大了模块实际强制的范围。compose-review.ts 只拒绝 readCensus.fresh > reportedThisRound——其自身注释称之为「模块的单边交叉校验」——任何少报都会被接受。已在被审 commit 上用探针验证：同一个上报了 9 条 finding 的轮次，真实普查 {fresh: 9, induced: 4} 会清零连续计数（8 >= 9 为假 → APPROVE），而少报的 {fresh: 4, induced: 4} 通过校验、推进连续计数，并在一个实际收敛的轮次发出非收敛阻塞项（REQUEST_CHANGES）。多报方向有测试钉住；少报方向没有任何钉住，且本句还会打消他人补上边界的念头。请如实表述该校验——大于全部上报的 fresh 会被当作无普查拒绝；该上限以下的准确性只能由 agent 自己保证——或者，若确实要这个保证，请补上对称守卫。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R3-7: This sentence mandates omitting the census in the context-unavailable state, but compose-review.ts never refuses a census under it — the refusal set (prevRound === 0, induced > fresh, fresh > reportedThisRound) omits the one unmeasurable state the module itself holds as an input flag, while the sibling deferral channel enforces exactly that state mechanically (floorEnforcedReroute never fires under auto when contextUnavailable). Probed at the reviewed commit: a re-review with contextUnavailable: true, a surviving side file (round 3, churnRounds 1) and a model-written census {fresh: 11, induced: 7} advances the streak and files REQUEST_CHANGES off a measurement the module's own input declares unmeasurable — the context-unavailable cap only softens APPROVE, so nothing downstream stops it. Symmetric with the round-0 guard: const readCensus = prevRound === 0 || input.contextUnavailable === true ? null : churnCensusOf(input.convergence); — absence then carries the streak, exactly as this paragraph says an unmeasured round must.

中文说明

本句要求在 context-unavailable 状态下省略 census，但 compose-review.ts 从未在该状态下拒绝 census——拒绝集（prevRound === 0、induced > fresh、fresh > reportedThisRound）恰好遗漏了模块自身作为输入标志持有的那个不可测状态，而同级的延迟通道却在机械地强制该状态（contextUnavailable 时 floorEnforcedReroute 在 auto 下永不触发）。已在被审 commit 上用探针验证：contextUnavailable: true 的再审查，带着存活的 side file（round 3，churnRounds 1）与模型写下的 census {fresh: 11, induced: 7}，会推进连续计数并发出 REQUEST_CHANGES——依据的是模块自身输入已声明为不可测的测量；context-unavailable 的 cap 只软化 APPROVE，下游没有任何东西能拦下它。请与 round-0 守卫对称：const readCensus = prevRound === 0 || input.contextUnavailable === true ? null : churnCensusOf(input.convergence);——缺省随即原样携带连续计数，正是本段落对未测量轮次的要求。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] R3-8: The paragraph's two definitions of fresh diverge for a re-deferred finding. The opening definition counts findings that "FIRST APPEAR this round", but this clause counts every entry in this round's deferral channel unconditionally — and a finding deferred in round N, rediscovered and deferred again in round N+1, satisfies the channel clause while violating first-appearance. The case is reachable: deferrals never enter the machine ledger (buildLedger ingests only posted findings) and the posted deferral list is the first section the body budget trims, so the next round may hold no record that the defect is not new. Counting re-deferrals each round inflates fresh with old never-induced findings and dilutes induced * 2 >= fresh below the bar, delaying the non-convergence blocker precisely on the long-lived critical-floor PRs the mechanism exists for; taking the first-appearance reading instead undercounts against the paragraph's own enumeration. The one-sided cross-check catches neither reading. Add an explicit rule — "a deferral whose defect first appeared in an earlier round is not fresh; only deferrals minted this round count" — or drop the "FIRST APPEAR" qualifier if channel presence is meant to be authoritative.

中文说明

本段对 fresh 的两处定义在「被再次延迟的 finding」上分叉。开头定义计的是「本轮首次出现」的 finding，而本句无条件地把本轮延迟通道中的每个条目都计入——一个第 N 轮被延迟、第 N+1 轮被重新发现并再次延迟的 finding，满足通道条款却违反首次出现。该场景可达：延迟项从不进入机器 ledger（buildLedger 只摄取已发布 finding），而发布的延迟列表是正文预算第一个裁剪的部分，因此下一轮可能完全没有「该缺陷并非新缺陷」的记录。每轮都把再次延迟计入，会用陈旧的、绝不可能 induced 的 finding 抬高 fresh，稀释 induced * 2 >= fresh 到门槛以下，恰好在该机制为之存在的长周期 critical-floor PR 上推迟非收敛阻塞项；而按首次出现的读法，又会与本段自己的枚举相悖地少计。单边交叉校验两种读法都拦不住。请补一条显式规则——「缺陷首发于更早轮次的延迟项不是 fresh；只计本轮新产生的延迟」——或者，若通道存在与否才是权威，请删去「FIRST APPEAR」限定。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 3/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 3/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Round 6 address-review summary — PR #9596

This round's feedback carried no Criticals, no failed checks, and no new inline
findings — the new review (rv:4997172185, COMMENTED) confirmed four
Suggestion-level findings already reported in round 1 and deferred since round
2, and listed six further items as recorded-not-requested under the round-6
convergence posture. With the batch otherwise empty and the growth window at
0/400 on both axes, this round closes the four long-deferred Suggestions.

Feedback points and dispositions

1. R1-9 — ruling-vocabulary parenthetical omits fix-induced (comment 3824051799) — FIXED

Reproduced by grep: renderLedgerSection rendered the closed tuple
(fixed / still stands / cannot tell / superseded by <class-id>) directly
above the work list a re-reviewer rules, while Step 6 defines five
dispositions. A round taking the tuple as exhaustive rules a fix-induced case
as fixed plus a fresh id — the induced census stays 0 and the churn streak
never arms.

Change: added fix-induced to the parenthetical in pr-context.ts (order
matches Step 6's disposition list), and extended the renderLedgerSection
work-list test to pin the full vocabulary.

Witness probe: reverting the parenthetical reds the new assertion
(1 failed | 122 passed); restored → 123 passed.

2. R1-10 — census counting-definition clauses pinned by no assertion (comment 3824051805, same root as maintainer comment 3824047139) — FIXED

Reproduced: the census test pinned the handoff shape, the omission clause, and
the module-rules clause, but not the definition of what is counted. The
wording changed since the finding was filed; the pins target the current
clauses.

Change: added four assertions to the census test in SKILL.test.ts:
fix-induced findings count in fresh whichever way they were id'd, the
(they are new defects; the id is bookkeeping) clause, the
`induced` is a SUBSET of `fresh` clause, and the attributed-count-not-
new-lines clause.

Witness probes (each mutation reds, restored greens):

• delete the fix-induced-count clause → 1 failed | 26 passed
• delete the SUBSET clause → 1 failed | 26 passed
• delete the attributed-count clause → 1 failed | 26 passed

3. R1-11 — three-halves fix-witness test pins only two halves (comment 3824051829, same root as maintainer comment 3824047133) — FIXED

Reproduced: the test named the N/A exemption as its third half in a comment
but carried no assertion covering it at either site (the finding-format
declaration in SKILL.md and the posting rule's silence clause).

Change: added the two missing assertions inside the existing test.

Witness probes:

• rewrite the format exemption into a reporting bar → 1 failed | 26 passed
• rewrite the posting-rule silence clause into a bar → 1 failed | 26 passed

4. R1-17 — marker census pair has no production reader (comment 3824051774, same root as maintainer comment 3824046973) — FIXED (subtractive option)

Reproduced by a read-site sweep: churnFresh/churnInduced were written into
every marker, serialized, parsed back, and persisted into the prev-ledger side
file, but nothing consumed them — prevLedgerFacts reads
round/posted/churnRounds/findings/floor/fresh only, and no render or gate
reads the pair. The field doc justified them with a trend line that does not
exist. Both findings offered drop-from-marker as an accepted fix; per
Simplicity First and this window's subtractive-fix preference, the pair is
dropped rather than given a new consumer. The census keeps its two live
homes — the body prose (the non-convergence finding) and the compose input.

Changes (net −116 lines for the round):

• ledger.ts: removed the two Ledger fields and doc, the serializer's
  census write block, and the parser's census read block. The 'both' shed
  rung now carries only prevPosted; the shed-cascade order and the streak's
  placement above it are unchanged.
• compose-review.ts: dropped the now-unused churnCensus parameter from
  ledgerMarkerFor and its call site; the census still drives the streak and
  the blocker through the compose input exactly as before.
• pr-context.ts: CHURN_FIELDS shrinks to ['churnRounds']; the three
  strip/restore seams operate on the unchanged group machinery.
• SKILL.md: two clauses said a zeros census "stamps the marker's telemetry"
  — telemetry the census no longer reaches — and are reworded to the honest
  reading (a zeros pair states a measurement the round never made).
• Tests: the census round-trip/shape/shed tests that pinned the dead pair are
  removed; the boundary fixture is re-derived around prevPosted (the new
  first-shed field); every surviving assertion pins behavior that remains.

Test-deletion evidence (per the round rules): the pinned behavior itself is
the defect both findings name — data written, serialized, shed, and persisted
with zero production readers, spending the deliberately-measured 8 KiB marker
budget. Surviving coverage is named and probed: the streak write (mutant probe:
deleting it reds 12 tests), the streak's placement above the shed cascade
(mutant probe: nesting it in the volume rung reds 2 tests, including the
re-derived boundary test), the foreign-strip/own-restore/persist seams
(surviving churnRounds assertions in pr-context and pr-context-persist
suites), and the prevPosted-before-posted shed order (the volume sweep test).

Not addressed this round (explicitly recorded, not requested)

The six items under "Deferred under the convergence posture (round 6, not a
blocker)" are the reviewer's record-not-request entries and are left as is.
The review's "Test Plan (not a blocker)" note names
src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts, a path that does not exist in
the tree (the real file is packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts);
this is a reviewer-side execution disclosure, not a code defect — no action.

Verification

• npm run build — passed (exit 0)
• npm run typecheck — passed (exit 0)
• npm run lint — passed (exit 0)
• npx vitest run src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts (packages/core) — 27 passed
• npx vitest run src/commands/review src/utils/findings.test.ts (packages/cli) — 99 files, 4466 passed | 4 skipped
• Mutation probes: 8 mutants red / restored green (R1-9 vocabulary ×1, R1-10
  clauses ×3, R1-11 exemptions ×2, streak write ×1, streak shed placement ×1)
• No settings source touched → npm run generate:settings-schema not required
• Changed behavior is unit-covered at the serializer/parser/compose seams →
  no bundled-CLI integration run required

中文说明

第 6 轮 address-review 总结 — PR #9596

本轮反馈没有 Critical、没有失败检查、也没有新的内联发现——新审查（rv:4997172185，COMMENTED）确认了 4 条已在第 1 轮报告、自第 2 轮起一直延后的建议级发现，并按第 6 轮收敛姿态将另外 6 条列为「已记录、本轮不要求」。本轮批次除此之外为空、增长预算两轴均为 0/400，因此本轮关闭这 4 条长期延后的建议。

反馈点与处置

1. R1-9 — 裁定词汇括号列表缺 fix-induced（评论 3824051799）— 已修复

用 grep 复现：renderLedgerSection 在再审查者要裁定的工作清单正上方渲染封闭元组 (fixed / still stands / cannot tell / superseded by <class-id>)，而 Step 6 定义了五种裁定。把它当作穷尽列表的轮次会把 fix-induced 情形裁成 fixed 加一个新 id——induced 普查保持 0，churn 连续计数永不累计。

修改：在 pr-context.ts 的括号列表中加入 fix-induced（顺序与 Step 6 的裁定列表一致），并扩展 renderLedgerSection 工作清单测试以钉住完整词汇。

见证探针：回退括号列表使新断言变红（1 failed | 122 passed）；恢复后 123 passed。

2. R1-10 — 普查计数定义条款无断言钉住（评论 3824051805，与维护者评论 3824047139 同根）— 已修复

复现：普查测试钉住了交接形态、省略条款与模块裁决条款，却没有钉住「数什么」的定义。发现提交后措辞已变，钉子对准现有条款。

修改：在 SKILL.test.ts 的普查测试中新增四条断言：fix-induced 发现无论拿旧 id 还是新 id 都计入 fresh、(they are new defects; the id is bookkeeping) 条款、`induced` is a SUBSET of `fresh` 条款、以及「归因计数而非新行计数」条款。

见证探针（每个变异都变红、恢复后变绿）：

• 删除 fix-induced 计数条款 → 1 failed | 26 passed
• 删除 SUBSET 条款 → 1 failed | 26 passed
• 删除归因计数条款 → 1 failed | 26 passed

3. R1-11 — 三分支 fix-witness 测试只钉住两个半（评论 3824051829，与维护者评论 3824047133 同根）— 已修复

复现：该测试在注释中把 N/A 豁免称为第三个半，却没有任何断言覆盖两处豁免位点（SKILL.md 中 finding 格式的声明与发布规则的沉默条款）。

修改：在现有测试内补上缺失的两条断言。

见证探针：

• 把格式豁免改写为上报门槛 → 1 failed | 26 passed
• 把发布规则的沉默条款改写为门槛 → 1 failed | 26 passed

4. R1-17 — marker 普查对没有生产读取者（评论 3824051774，与维护者评论 3824046973 同根）— 已修复（选择删减方案）

用读取点普查复现：churnFresh/churnInduced 被写入每个 marker、被序列化、被解析回来、并被持久化进 prev-ledger side file，却没有任何消费者——prevLedgerFacts 只读 round/posted/churnRounds/findings/floor/fresh，没有任何渲染或门控读取该对。字段文档用一条并不存在的趋势线为其辩护。两条发现都把「从 marker 删除」列为可接受修法；按 Simplicity First 与本窗口「优先删减」的取向，选择删除该对而不是新增消费者。普查保留在它的两个活着的家——正文散文（非收敛 finding）与 compose 输入。

修改（本轮净 −116 行）：

• ledger.ts：删除两个 Ledger 字段及文档、序列化器的普查写入块、解析器的普查读取块。'both' 舍弃档现在只携带 prevPosted；舍弃级联顺序与 streak 位于其上的放置不变。
• compose-review.ts：删除 ledgerMarkerFor 已不再使用的 churnCensus 参数及其调用点；普查仍通过 compose 输入驱动 streak 与阻塞项，与此前完全一致。
• pr-context.ts：CHURN_FIELDS 收缩为 ['churnRounds']；三个剥离/恢复接缝使用不变的分组机制。
• SKILL.md：有两处条款说零值普查会「盖到 marker 的遥测上」——而普查已不再到达该遥测——改写为诚实的表述（零值对陈述了一次该轮从未做过的测量）。
• 测试：删除钉住死数据对的普查往返/形态/舍弃测试；边界夹具围绕 prevPosted（新的首个被舍弃字段）重新推导；所有幸存断言钉住保留下来的行为。

删测证据（按轮规则）：被钉住的行为本身正是两条发现指认的缺陷——数据被写入、序列化、舍弃、持久化，生产读取者为零，白白花费刻意度量的 8 KiB marker 预算。幸存覆盖有名字、有探针：streak 写入（变异探针：删除使 12 个测试变红）、streak 位于舍弃级联之上的放置（变异探针：嵌套进体积档使 2 个测试变红，含重新推导的边界测试）、外部剥离/自有恢复/持久化接缝（pr-context 与 pr-context-persist 套件中幸存的 churnRounds 断言）、以及 prevPosted 先于 posted 的舍弃顺序（体积扫描测试）。

本轮不处理（明确记录、非本轮要求）

「按收敛姿态延后（第 6 轮、非阻断）」下的 6 条是审查者的「记录而非要求」条目，维持原状。审查中「Test Plan（非阻断）」提到的 src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts 在树中不存在（真实文件为 packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts）；这是审查侧的执行披露，不是代码缺陷——无需动作。

验证

• npm run build — 通过（exit 0）
• npm run typecheck — 通过（exit 0）
• npm run lint — 通过（exit 0）
• npx vitest run src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts（packages/core）— 27 passed
• npx vitest run src/commands/review src/utils/findings.test.ts（packages/cli）— 99 个文件，4466 passed | 4 skipped
• 变异探针：8 个变异体变红／恢复后变绿（R1-9 词汇 ×1，R1-10 条款 ×3，R1-11 豁免 ×2，streak 写入 ×1，streak 舍弃放置 ×1）
• 未触及设置源 → 无需 npm run generate:settings-schema
• 变更行为在序列化器/解析器/compose 接缝处有单测覆盖 → 无需捆绑 CLI 集成测试

⚖️ Gate advisory — test coverage shrank this round (machine-measured, not agent-authored): net -71 test lines.

The justification must be in the round summary above; a deletion is only sound when the pinned behavior itself was wrong (evidence shown) or the coverage demonstrably survives elsewhere. · 本轮测试覆盖净减少（门自动测量，非 agent 文本）；删除是否成立请对照上方轮次摘要中的理由——仅当被钉住的行为本身有误（需给出证据）或覆盖确有替代时才合理。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

1 Suggestion-level finding(s) this review confirmed are already reported on this PR and are not repeated:

• D7-1 census pass-through at the two posting boundaries pinned by no test — already recorded as deferred in round 6 (review 4997172185)

Not reviewed: build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally.

Not explored to full depth (tool budget reached): chunk 5: executing pr-context-persist.test.ts / pr-context.test.ts under vitest — the shared review worktree has no installed dependencies ( vitest unresolvable at ….

Test Plan (not a blocker): src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory.

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

本轮确认的 1 条建议级发现已在 PR 上报告过，不再重复发布（列表见上方英文部分）。

未审查：build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally。

未探索到全部深度（达到工具调用预算）：chunk 5：executing pr-context-persist.test.ts / pr-context.test.ts under vitest — the shared review worktree has no installed dependencies ( vitest unresolvable at …。

Test Plan（非阻断）：src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Could not produce a passing fix for this feedback (round 4/100). This item now needs a human; the loop stays engaged and still picks up new feedback and base conflicts, but will not retry this item on its own.

What I found before stopping:

Blocked: Dependency CVE audit fails on an upstream tar advisory — fix requires a maintainer-owned lockfile bump

Blocker

The PR check Dependency CVE audit fails. Reproduced locally with the exact command the check runs:

npm audit --omit=dev --audit-level=high
# exit code 1

The single failing finding (the other 7 audit findings are moderate/low and do not trip the --audit-level=high gate):

• Package: tar@7.5.19 — direct production dependency of packages/core (declared as "tar": "^7.5.19")
• Advisory: GHSA-r292-9mhp-454m, "node-tar: Uncontrolled recursion in mapHas/filesFilter allows uncatchable stack-overflow DoS via crafted long-path tar with member selection" (severity high, CVSS 3.1 score 7.5)
• Vulnerable range per registry advisory data: <= 7.5.20
• Locked version: 7.5.19 → inside the range → fails the gate

Why this PR is not the cause

PR #9596 touches no dependency manifests or lockfiles at all:

git diff origin/main HEAD -- '*package*.json' .npmrc patches/
# empty

package-lock.json and every workspace package.json are byte-identical to origin/main (the branch already merged main). npm audit is a pure function of (lockfile, live advisory database), so the same command fails identically on main: an upstream advisory was published against an already-pinned dependency tree. This is a repository-wide event that turns this check red on every open PR, not a regression introduced by this branch.

Why I did not

中文说明

🤖 未能为该反馈产生可通过验证的修复（第 4/100 轮）。此项现在需要人工处理；循环保持在线，仍会拾取新反馈与 base 冲突，但不会自行重试此项。

停止前我了解到的情况：

受阻：Dependency CVE audit 因上游 tar 安全公告而失败——修复需由维护者升级 lockfile

阻塞点

PR 检查 Dependency CVE audit 失败。已用该检查实际执行的命令在本地复现：

npm audit --omit=dev --audit-level=high
# 退出码 1

唯一的失败项（其余 7 条审计发现均为 moderate/low，不会触发 --audit-level=high 门槛）：

• 包：tar@7.5.19 —— packages/core 的直接生产依赖（声明为 "tar": "^7.5.19"）
• 安全公告：GHSA-r292-9mhp-454m，“node-tar: mapHas/filesFilter 中的不受控递归允许通过构造的长路径 tar（带成员选择）造成不可捕获的栈溢出 DoS”（severity high，CVSS 3.1 评分 7.5）
• 注册表公告数据中的受影响范围：7.5.20 及以下（即 ≤ 7.5.20）
• 锁定版本：7.5.19 → 在受影响范围内 → 触发门槛失败

为什么不是本 PR 导致

PR #9596 完全没有改动任何依赖清单或 lockfile：

git diff origin/main HEAD -- '*package*.json' .npmrc patches/
# 空

package-lock.json 与所有 workspace 的 package.json 都和 origin/main 逐字节一致（分支已合并过 main）。npm audit 是 (lockfile, 实时公告数据库) 的纯函数，因此同一条命令在 main 上会以完全相同的方式失败：上游针对已经锁定的依赖树发布了新公告。这是一个仓库级事件，会使所有开放 PR 上的该检查变红，并非本分支引入的回归。

为什么本轮没有直接修复

机械性修复是存在的，且不超出声明的版本范围：npm audit fix --dry-run --omit=dev 建议 change tar 7.5.19 => 7.5.22（最新发布的 7.5.22 满足已声明的 ^7.5.19，且在受影响范围之外）。但应用该修复需要重写 package-lock.json —— 属于供应链/lockfile 区域，autofix 规则明确禁止在一个本身与依赖无关的 PR 的轮次中触碰（“the gate deterministically rejects a round that expands into those areas outside the PR's own footprint”）。门槛策略本身位于 .github/workflows/security-checks.yml，并由 scripts/tests/security-workflows.test.js 锁定，两者同样不在本 PR 的足迹之内。依赖升级应当是一次由维护者主导的审慎变更，而不是在一个 review 命令相关 PR 里顺手修改。

已尝试 / 已验证的内容

• 在本地运行了与 CI 完全一致的命令：npm audit --omit=dev --audit-level=high → 退出码 1；定位出唯一的 high 发现。
• 提取审计 JSON：tar 漏洞的受影响范围为 7.5.20 及以下（range 字段）、isDirect: true、severity: high；lockfile 锁定 7.5.19。
• npm view tar version → 7.5.22（已存在修复版本）。
• npm audit fix --dry-run --omit=dev → 建议 tar 7.5.19 => 7.5.22，无需 --force（在 semver 范围内）。
• 运行了该检查包含的按包审计 packages/desktop-shell → 退出码 0，0 个漏洞（packages/mobile-mcp 被

Run log: https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code/actions/runs/32537184904

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

5 Suggestion-level finding(s) this review confirmed are already reported on this PR and are not repeated:

• census pass-through at the two posting boundaries pinned by no test — already recorded as deferred in round 6 (review 4997172185) and confirmed already-reported in round 7
• weld test pins only one FINDING_FORMAT embedding site (chunk-agent path unpinned) — already recorded as deferred in rounds 4 and 6
• fix-induced rule has no collapse-rule exception — already reported (comment 3824047060), deferred rounds 1-3
• 'under the original id' operative clause pinned by no test — already reported as R1-14 (comment 3824051841)
• Step 7 convergence bullet is an unpinned second copy of the census semantics — already reported as R1-12 (comment 3824051819)

Not reviewed: build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally.

Not explored to full depth (tool budget reached): chunk 1: none — no check was cut short..

Test Plan (not a blocker): src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 8, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.md:1025 — [review] fix-witness sentence claims the body's closing slot; conflicts with the mandatory always-last model footer
• packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts:2483 — [probe] Fix-witness middle clause ('the test file and the behaviour it pins') pinned by no test in either copy
• packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.ts:1006 — [probe] same-round foreign winner with stale walked own marker zeroes the streak the side file validly holds
• packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts:734 — [probe] re-deferral exclusion clause ('deferred again is not fresh') pinned by no test

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

本轮确认的 5 条建议级发现已在 PR 上报告过，不再重复发布（列表见上方英文部分）。

未审查：build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally。

未探索到全部深度（达到工具调用预算）：chunk 1：none — no check was cut short.。

Test Plan（非阻断）：src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory。

收敛姿态下延后（第 8 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 4 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Critical] The census cross-check denominator reportedThisRound omits the duplicate-dropped channel — findings this round CONFIRMED (they count toward the verdict's S and appear in the body's duplicates paragraph) which the overlap rule removes from the payload before compose. The SKILL census rule excludes from fresh only findings that "reach no channel", and duplicate-dropped findings do reach one — so a model that counts them in fresh follows the rule as written, and the module then refuses that legitimate census as impossible.

Concrete shape: round 3 with a carried streak of 1 confirms 3 Suggestions the overlap rule drops as already reported, plus 3 ordinary fresh findings, and hands over convergence: {fresh: 6, induced: 1}. The 3 duplicate-dropped findings are absent from draftedComments, so reportedThisRound is 3; fresh (6) > 3 refuses the census, and the below-bar round is read as unmeasured — the streak CARRIES where the module's own contract says a measured below-bar round RESETS, so the next above-bar round files the non-convergence blocker on a streak a genuinely converged round should have zeroed. Symmetrically, an above-bar round with duplicate-dropped fresh findings loses its advance and the blocker is delayed.

Witness (probe in an isolated scratch tree at this commit):

round 3, carried streak 1, census {fresh: 6, induced: 1}, 3 drafted + 3 suggestionsDroppedAsDuplicates:
  PR:      churnRounds: 1 | event: COMMENT | non-convergence filed: false   (census refused, streak CARRIES)
  control (same census, all 6 through the drafted channel):
           churnRounds: undefined | event: APPROVE                          (streak RESETS)
  with the fix below: churnRounds: undefined — and all 20 existing census tests stay green

Suggested change

	const reportedThisRound =
	(Array.isArray(input.draftedComments) ? input.draftedComments.length : 0) +
	(Array.isArray(input.bodyCriticals) ? input.bodyCriticals.length : 0) +
	(Array.isArray(input.deferredSuggestions)
	? input.deferredSuggestions.length
	: 0);
	const reportedThisRound =
	(Array.isArray(input.draftedComments) ? input.draftedComments.length : 0) +
	(Array.isArray(input.bodyCriticals) ? input.bodyCriticals.length : 0) +
	(Array.isArray(input.deferredSuggestions)
	? input.deferredSuggestions.length
	: 0) +
	(Array.isArray(input.suggestionsDroppedAsDuplicates)
	? input.suggestionsDroppedAsDuplicates.length
	: 0);

中文说明

[Critical] census 交叉校验的分母 reportedThisRound 遗漏了「因重复被丢弃」这一通道——这些 finding 是本轮确认过的（计入裁决的 S，并出现在正文的重复说明段），只是被 overlap 规则在组装前从负载中移除。SKILL 的 census 规则只把「未到达任何通道」的 finding 排除在 fresh 之外，而因重复被丢弃的 finding 确实到达了一个通道——因此按原文规则把它们计入 fresh 的模型并没有错，而模块随后却把这份合法 census 当作「不可能」拒绝。

具体形态：第 3 轮（携带 streak 1）确认了 3 条被 overlap 规则以「已报告」为由丢弃的 Suggestion，另有 3 条普通新 finding，并交出 convergence: {fresh: 6, induced: 1}。那 3 条被丢弃的 finding 不在 draftedComments 中，reportedThisRound 为 3；fresh (6) > 3 拒绝该 census，本轮低于门槛却被读作「未测量」——streak 被携带（CARRY），而按模块自身的契约，实测低于门槛的轮次应当清零（RESET）——于是下一个越线轮次会基于一个本应被清零的 streak 上报非收敛阻塞项。对称地，越线轮次若有因重复被丢弃的新 finding，其推进也会丢失，阻塞项被推迟。

见证（在本 commit 上的独立 scratch tree 中探针）：见上方代码块。

修复建议：把重复丢弃通道加入分母（见上方 suggestion）；或者在 SKILL 的「不计入」列表中明确排除该通道，使 census 与接缝一致。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Critical] The churn streak is a CUMULATIVE counter, but the union restores it from this account's own marker only under the same-round gate — so whenever the recovered winner is a foreign marker at a strictly NEWER round than this account's latest own marker, stripChurnState removes the winner's streak and nothing restores the account's own: an interleaved foreign round silently zeroes the standing streak. That is the one state transition the diff's own carry contract forbids — churnRounds's JSDoc, compose-review's three-state comment, and the filed blocker's body all say unmeasured rounds CARRY; only a measured below-bar census resets.

Concrete shape: account A posts two consecutive above-bar rounds (streak 2); account B posts a marker at the next round; on A's following round, recovery picks B's newer marker as winner, the seam strip sheds its streak, the same-round gate skips pickChurnState (rounds differ), and A reads streak 0. Even with an above-bar census the streak only reaches 1 < CHURN_STREAK_TO_FILE (2), so the blocker never files — and on any PR where two accounts alternate, every account's streak is reset before it can reach the filing bar, disarming the mechanism wholesale.

Witness (probe through the real recoverLedger + persistRecoveredLedger at this commit; own marker round 3 with churnRounds: 2, foreign marker round 4):

PR:  side file: round=4 churnRounds=undefined   -> next compose: churnRounds=1, blockerFiled=false, event=APPROVE
FIX (restore churn outside the round gate):
     side file: round=4 churnRounds=2           -> probe reds: "expected 2 to be undefined"

The volume gate's same-round restriction is correct — volume is a per-round count that must not be re-paired with a round it does not describe. The cumulative streak has no such pairing constraint (the round clamp in prevLedgerFacts/parseLedger already bounds it), and filing still requires this round's own above-bar census, so restoring creates no earliness. Suggested fix: spread ...pickChurnState(bestOwn.ledger) outside the if (bestOwn.ledger.round === ledger.round) conditional (keeping pickVolume gated), and adjust pickChurnState's docblock, which currently describes the streak as per-round state. Note the cross-round test ("a FOREIGN winner reaching the side file carries no planted churn state") pins churnRounds undefined in this shape as a side effect of its anti-plant assertion; the fix flips that expectation for own's legitimate streak, so its framing needs adjusting too.

中文说明

[Critical] churn streak 是一个累积计数器，但 union 只在「同轮」门内从本账号自己的 marker 恢复它——因此只要恢复出的赢家是轮次严格新于本账号最新 marker 的外部 marker，stripChurnState 剥掉赢家的 streak 后没有任何东西恢复本账号自己的：一个插入的外部轮次会悄悄把已成立的 streak 清零。这正是 diff 自身的携带契约所禁止的状态转移——churnRounds 的 JSDoc、compose-review 的三态注释、以及阻塞项正文都说「未测量的轮次携带计数」；只有实测低于门槛的 census 才会清零。

具体形态：账号 A 连续两轮越线（streak 2）；账号 B 在下一轮发布 marker；A 的再下一轮恢复时选中 B 的更新 marker 为赢家，接缝剥离其（不存在的）streak，同轮门因轮次不同跳过 pickChurnState，A 读到 streak 0。即便有越线 census，streak 也只能到 1 < CHURN_STREAK_TO_FILE（2），阻塞项永不上报——在任何两个账号交替评审的 PR 上，每个账号的 streak 都会在到达门槛前被重置，机制被整体解除武装。

见证（通过真实 recoverLedger + persistRecoveredLedger 的探针，own marker round 3 / churnRounds: 2，外部 marker round 4）：见上方代码块。

修复建议：在 union 分支中让 churn 组的恢复独立于同轮 volume 门——把 ...pickChurnState(bestOwn.ledger) 移到 if (bestOwn.ledger.round === ledger.round) 条件之外（pickVolume 保持门内），并调整目前把 streak 描述为按轮状态的 pickChurnState 文档块。注意跨轮测试（「外部赢家到达 side file 不携带植入的 churn 状态」）把该形状下的 churnRounds undefined 当作防植入断言的副作用钉住了；此修复会翻转该断言对「本账号合法 streak」的期望，其表述也需相应调整。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Critical] The anonymous-advance branch drops this account's OWN certified churn streak on an unmeasured round — the state the diff's carry contract says must carry. The branch writes only round/reviewId from the winner over the kept existing content — no winner ledger field reaches this seam — so both rationale clauses above the line are inapplicable: "silently discard the foreign winner's own streak state" describes state that cannot arrive here (the winner's streak is already stripped at the recovery seam, and its findings never reach the persist seam), and "re-dated across a round this account never ran, it arms the non-convergence finding early" cannot occur because filing still requires this round's own above-bar census — carrying never arms early.

Concrete shape: the side file holds round N with churnRounds: 1; the identity lookup throws (the gh api user blip the adjacent volume comment itself anticipates) while another integration's round N+1 marker wins anonymous recovery; this branch advances the counter to N+1 and drops churnRounds from this machine's own local side file. The next identity-known round reads streak 0, so even an above-bar census only reaches 1 < CHURN_STREAK_TO_FILE — the blocker needs a whole extra above-bar round to re-arm, while the filed blocker's own body promises "rounds that could not measure carry the count rather than reset it". The sibling unmeasurable state in this same function (recovery THREW) carries the streak — two unmeasurable states, opposite treatments. Repeated identity blips keep zeroing the streak, making the blocker unreachable on exactly the churning PRs the mechanism exists for.

Witness (probe, same input both arms, at this commit):

PR:            written side file {round: 4, reviewId: 99, churnRounds: null}
               next identity-known round: churnRounds: 1, blockerFiled: false, event: APPROVE
FIX (carry):   written side file {round: 4, reviewId: 99, churnRounds: 1}
               next identity-known round: churnRounds: 2, blockerFiled: true, event: REQUEST_CHANGES

Suggested change

	const kept = withoutChurn(withoutVolume(rest));
	const kept = withoutVolume(rest);

If the fix is taken, the two inapplicable rationale clauses above the line and the drop-witness test's expectation (churnRounds toBeUndefined after anonymous advance) need the same flip; if the reset is instead the intended degradation, amend compose-review's three-state contract comment and the blocker body sentence that assert unmeasured rounds carry.

中文说明

[Critical] 匿名推进分支在一个未测量的轮次丢弃了本账号自己已认证的 churn streak——而 diff 的携带契约说该状态必须携带。该分支只把赢家的 round/reviewId 写到保留的既有内容之上——赢家的任何 ledger 字段都到不了这个接缝——因此该行上方的两条理由从句均不适用：「悄悄丢弃外部赢家自己的 streak 状态」描述的状态到不了这里（赢家的 streak 已在恢复接缝被剥离，其 findings 也到不了持久化接缝）；「被重新标注到本账号从未运行的轮次、使非收敛 finding 提前武装」也不可能发生，因为上报仍要求本轮自身的越线 census——携带永远不会导致提前武装。

具体形态：side file 为第 N 轮、churnRounds: 1；身份查询抛错（正是旁边 volume 注释自己预期的 gh api user 瞬时故障），另一个集成的第 N+1 轮 marker 赢得匿名恢复；本分支把计数器推进到 N+1，并从本机自己的 side file 中丢弃 churnRounds。下一个身份已知的轮次读到 streak 0，即使有越线 census 也只能到 1 < CHURN_STREAK_TO_FILE——阻塞项需要整整多一个越线轮才能重新武装，而阻塞项正文自己承诺「无法测量的轮次携带计数而非清零」。同一函数中的另一个不可测状态（恢复抛错）携带 streak——两个不可测状态，两种相反处理。反复的身份查询故障会反复清零 streak，使阻塞项恰恰在该机制针对的高频打转 PR 上永远无法到达。

见证（探针，两臂输入相同，在本 commit 上）：见上方代码块。

若采纳修复，该行上方两条不适用的理由从句与 drop 见证测试的期望（匿名推进后 churnRounds toBeUndefined）需同样翻转；若清零确为预期的降级行为，则应修改 compose-review 的三态契约注释与阻塞项正文中「未测量轮次携带计数」的表述。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 5/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 5/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Round summary

Resolved all three Critical findings from review rv:4999087554, and merged
origin/main (required base-conflict resolution in compose-review.ts and
its test).

Base merge (--conflict true)

Merged origin/main (4 commits, incl. #9623's machine-readable convergence
half). Two conflicts, both resolved by understanding both sides:

• compose-review.ts — prevLedgerFacts return type: this branch added
  churnRounds, main added anchored. Kept both; the auto-merged body
  already computed and returned each.
• compose-review.test.ts — both sides appended independent top-level
  describe blocks at EOF (this branch's census block, main's
  deferrableSuggestionsInline block). Kept both.

Post-merge, all 97 review test files (4430 tests) were green before this
round's fixes began.

[rc:3835204861] census denominator vs the duplicate-dropped channel — fixed (SKILL side)

Reproduced the seam behavior at this commit: a census whose fresh counts
duplicate-dropped confirmations is refused (fresh > reportedThisRound),
the round reads as unmeasured, and the streak carries where a measured
below-bar round would reset.

The finding offered two fixes; this round takes the second one it names —
excluding the channel in SKILL's NOT-counted list — because it is the
root-cause side: a duplicate-dropped finding is a RECONFIRMATION of a
defect an earlier round identified, never a NEWLY IDENTIFIED defect, so it
does not belong in fresh at all. Widening the module's denominator (the
first suggested fix) would accept censuses that count non-new findings,
dilute the induced/fresh ratio, and let the blocker's published sentence
("Of the N defects round X newly identified…") state an inflated N. With
the exclusion explicit, the rule as written and the module's cross-check
agree, no legitimate census is refused, and the one-sided under-count
tolerance is unchanged. Pinned by a new clause assertion in the census
contract test.

[rc:3835204881] churn streak lost across a newer foreign winner — fixed

Reproduced via the flipped persist-seam test: own marker round 3
churnRounds: 1, foreign winner round 4 → the side file held no streak.
The streak is cumulative and the carry contract says unmeasured rounds
carry; only the VOLUME restore legitimately needs the same-round gate. The
union now restores pickChurnState(bestOwn.ledger) regardless of round,
keeping pickVolume gated. No foreign state enters (the winner's streak is
stripped at the recovery seam; the restore spreads only the own marker), no
earliness (filing still requires this round's own above-bar census; the
read clamp bounds the streak at the file's round). The cross-round test now
asserts own streak restored (1) AND planted streak gone (never 4); its
framing and the same-round test's stale cross-round reference were updated,
and pickChurnState's docblock no longer describes the restore as
per-round.

[rc:3835204885] anonymous advance drops the own certified streak — fixed

Reproduced via the flipped drop-witness test: existing file round 7 with
churnRounds: 2, anonymous advance to round 8 → the streak was dropped.
Both rationale clauses that justified the drop are inapplicable, exactly as
the finding argues: the winner's streak cannot reach this seam (recovery
strips it — in an anonymous walk every marker is foreign), and carrying
cannot arm the blocker early (filing requires THIS round's own above-bar
census). The branch now keeps the streak (withoutVolume(rest)), aligning
with the sibling unmeasurable state (recovery threw → file untouched →
streak carries) and with the blocker body's own promise that unmeasured
rounds carry. The carry replaces the drop witness in the test, and the
stripChurnState, CHURN_FIELDS, and persistRecoveredLedger docblocks
were re-aligned to the new seam split (volume per-round, streak
cumulative).

Mutation probes (all red on mutation, green on restore)

1. Removed the new SKILL exclusion clause → census-contract pin failed.
2. Re-gated the union churn restore to same-round → cross-round persist
   test failed (streak undefined where 1 expected).
3. Re-added withoutChurn to the anonymous advance → anonymous-advance
   test failed (streak dropped where 2 expected).

Failed check: Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)

No GitHub credentials are available in this round, so the CI log itself
could not be read; the check was diagnosed by exact local reproduction on
the same commit (61949c5):

• Full npm run test:ci reproduced ONE failing test:
  integrations/external-context/src/provider-extension-local.test.ts —
  npm pack --dry-run fails with EACCES because /home/github-runner/.npm
  on this shared self-hosted runner class contains root-owned files
  ("Your cache folder contains root-owned files").
• The same test PASSES under a clean HOME (the shape CI's hosted
  environment uses): 15/15 green.
• Everything else in the full suite is green at that commit, so no
  code-level defect was found to fix. The test file is also outside this
  PR's footprint, so it is reported here rather than patched in this round.
  The new head (merge + fixes) re-runs the gate in CI.

Locally-only, pre-existing on base: AuthDialog provider-order test

One deterministic local failure exists at every commit examined (including
the pre-merge head): src/ui/auth/AuthDialog.test.tsx > drives API key provider steps from endpoint options metadata. The test moves one step
down from DeepSeek API Key and expects MiniMax API Key; the provider
list has carried Grok (xAI) API Key between them since #6805
(2026-07-14), which never updated this test. It is pre-existing on
origin/main, cannot be the CI failure (the whole block skips under
CI=true via itWhenTuiInputReliable), and sits outside this PR's
footprint — reported here instead of patched in this round.

Verification

• npm run build — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed
• npm run lint — passed
• npx vitest run src/commands/review/ (packages/cli, touched) — 97 files,
  4430 passed | 4 skipped
• npx vitest run src/skills/bundled/review/ (packages/core, touched) —
  27 passed
• npx vitest run packages/core, CI-shaped env (env -u QWEN_HOME -u SANDBOX HOME=<fresh>) — 598 files, 20853 passed | 10 skipped. (In the
  agent's sandboxed session, 82 unrelated tests fail purely from leaked
  session env: QWEN_HOME/SANDBOX point the storage/editor/logger tests
  at the harness home; clearing them — as CI has them — is green.)
• npx vitest run packages/cli, CI-shaped env — 867 files passed,
  23028 passed | 7 skipped; the only failures are the pre-existing
  AuthDialog provider-order test documented below (skipped on CI, out of
  footprint). The review-area subset above is the touched scope.
• Mutation probes ×3 — red on mutation, green on restore (above)

中文说明

本轮摘要

解决了审查 rv:4999087554 提出的全部 3 条 Critical 发现，并合并了
origin/main（需要在 compose-review.ts 及其测试中解决基础冲突）。

基础合并（--conflict true）

已合并 origin/main（4 个 commit，含 #9623 的收敛观测机器可读化）。两处冲突，均通过理解双方语义解决：

• compose-review.ts — prevLedgerFacts 返回类型：本分支新增
  churnRounds，main 新增 anchored。两者都保留；自动合并后的函数体
  本就计算并返回了这两个字段。
• compose-review.test.ts — 双方在文件末尾各自追加了独立的顶层
  describe 块（本分支的 census 块、main 的 deferrableSuggestionsInline
  块）。两者都保留。

合并后、本轮修复开始前，全部 97 个 review 测试文件（4430 个用例）已是绿色。

[rc:3835204861] census 分母与「因重复被丢弃」通道 — 已修复（SKILL 侧）

已在本 commit 上复现接缝行为：fresh 计入了重复丢弃确认项的 census
会被拒绝（fresh > reportedThisRound），该轮被读作「未测量」，于是
streak 在本应重置（实测低于门槛的轮次应重置）时被携带。

该发现给出了两种修复；本轮采用其点名的第二种——在 SKILL 的
NOT-counted 列表中排除该通道——因为这才是根因一侧：因重复被丢弃的
finding 是对更早轮次已识别缺陷的再确认，绝不是本轮新识别的缺陷，
本就不该计入 fresh。放宽模块分母（第一种建议修复）会接受把非新
finding 计入的 census，稀释 induced/fresh 比值，并使阻塞项的公开
表述（"Of the N defects round X newly identified…"）虚报 N。排除条款
明确后，规则原文与模块交叉校验一致，合法 census 不会被拒绝，
单侧「少计容忍」也不变。已由 census 契约测试中新增的从句断言钉住。

[rc:3835204881] 更新的外部赢家导致 churn streak 丢失 — 已修复

通过翻转后的持久化接缝测试复现：own marker 为第 3 轮、churnRounds: 1，
外部赢家为第 4 轮 → side file 中没有 streak。streak 是累积量，携带契约
规定未测量轮次携带计数；只有 VOLUME 的恢复合理地需要同轮门。union
现在无论轮次是否相同都恢复 pickChurnState(bestOwn.ledger)，
pickVolume 保持门内。不会有外部状态进入（赢家的 streak 已在恢复
接缝被剥离；恢复只展开 own marker 的状态），也不会提前武装（上报仍需
本轮自身的越线 census；读取侧钳位以文件轮次为上限）。跨轮测试现在
断言 own streak 被恢复（1）且植入的 streak 不存留（绝不为 4）；其表述
与同轮测试中对跨轮情形的过期引用已更新，pickChurnState 的文档块
不再把恢复描述为按轮状态。

[rc:3835204885] 匿名推进丢弃本账号已认证的 streak — 已修复

通过翻转后的 drop 见证测试复现：既有文件为第 7 轮、churnRounds: 2，
匿名推进到第 8 轮 → streak 被丢弃。支撑该丢弃的两条理由从句均不适用，
与该发现的论证一致：赢家的 streak 到不了这个接缝（恢复阶段已剥离——
匿名行走时每个 marker 都按外部处理）；携带也不会提前武装阻塞项
（上报仍需本轮自身的越线 census）。该分支现在保留 streak
（withoutVolume(rest)），与兄弟不可测状态（恢复抛错 → 文件不动 →
streak 携带）以及阻塞项正文自己「未测量轮次携带计数」的承诺一致。
测试中携带断言替换了原丢弃见证，stripChurnState、CHURN_FIELDS、
persistRecoveredLedger 的文档块已按新的接缝划分（volume 按轮、
streak 累积）重新对齐。

变异探针（变异即红，恢复即绿）

1. 删除新增的 SKILL 排除从句 → census 契约钉住测试失败。
2. 把 union 的 churn 恢复重新门控到同轮 → 跨轮持久化测试失败
   （streak 应为 1 处读到 undefined）。
3. 在匿名推进中重新加回 withoutChurn → 匿名推进测试失败
   （streak 应为 2 处被丢弃）。

失败检查：Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)

本轮没有 GitHub 凭据，无法读取 CI 日志本身；该检查通过对同一
commit（61949c5697）的本地精确复现来诊断：

• 完整 npm run test:ci 复现出唯一一个失败测试：
  integrations/external-context/src/provider-extension-local.test.ts —
  npm pack --dry-run 以 EACCES 失败，原因是该共享自托管 runner
  类别上 /home/github-runner/.npm 含 root 属主文件
  （"Your cache folder contains root-owned files"）。
• 同一测试在干净 HOME（CI 托管环境的形态）下通过：15/15 绿。
• 该 commit 上全套测试的其余部分均为绿色，因此未发现可修复的代码级
  缺陷。该测试文件也不在本 PR 的足迹范围内，故在本轮中报告于此而非
  直接修补。新的 head（合并 + 修复）将在 CI 中重新运行该关卡。

仅本地、基础分支上已存在：AuthDialog 供应商顺序测试

在检查过的每个 commit（含合并前的 head）上都存在一个确定性的本地失败：
src/ui/auth/AuthDialog.test.tsx > drives API key provider steps from endpoint options metadata。该测试从 DeepSeek API Key 向下移动一步并期望
选中 MiniMax API Key；而供应商列表自 #6805（2026-07-14）起就在两者之间
加入了 Grok (xAI) API Key，该 commit 没有同步更新此测试。它在
origin/main 上已存在，不可能是 CI 失败的原因（整个测试块在 CI=true
下经由 itWhenTuiInputReliable 被跳过），也不在本 PR 的足迹范围内——
故在此报告而非本轮修补。

验证

• npm run build — 通过
• npm run typecheck — 通过
• npm run lint — 通过
• npx vitest run src/commands/review/（packages/cli，触及范围）—
  97 个文件，4430 通过 | 4 跳过
• npx vitest run src/skills/bundled/review/（packages/core，触及范围）—
  27 通过
• npx vitest run packages/core，CI 形态环境（env -u QWEN_HOME -u SANDBOX HOME=<全新目录>）— 598 个文件，20853 通过 | 10 跳过。
  （在代理的沙箱会话中，82 个不相关测试纯粹因会话环境变量泄漏而失败：
  QWEN_HOME/SANDBOX 把 storage/editor/logger 测试指向了宿主目录；
  按 CI 的形态清除后即绿。）
• npx vitest run packages/cli，CI 形态环境 — 867 个文件通过，
  23028 通过 | 7 跳过；唯一失败是下文记录的、基础分支上已存在的
  AuthDialog 供应商顺序测试（CI 上被跳过、不在足迹范围内）。
  上方 review 范围子集即本轮触及范围。
• 变异探针 ×3 — 变异即红、恢复即绿（见上）

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: conflicted with main — resolved in this push. · 与 main 有冲突——已在本次推送中解决。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

3 Suggestion-level finding(s) this review confirmed are already reported on this PR and are not repeated:

• R9-1 convergence passthrough unpinned on both production routes — already recorded as deferred in round 6 (review 4997172185) and confirmed already-reported in rounds 7 and 8
• R9-2 weld test pins only the buildRoleBrief route and the middle clause is unpinned — already recorded as deferred in rounds 4/6 (chunk-agent path) and round 8 (middle clause)
• R9-3 ordinal weld test never exercises streak 13 — already recorded as deferred in round 4 (mutant probed green); re-confirmed first-hand this round

Not reviewed: build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally.

Not reviewed: reverse audit — did not converge within the reverse-audit round cap of 5.

Test Plan (not a blocker): src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 9, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.md:1025 — [review] fix-witness posting rule never covers body Critical entries
• packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts:2486 — [probe] the mandate paragraph's directive sentence is pinned by no test
• packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts:2482 — [probe] weld test pins the format for role '1a' only; the other 12 finder roles are unpinned

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

本轮确认的 3 条建议级发现已在 PR 上报告过，不再重复发布（列表见上方英文部分）。

未审查：build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally。

未审查：反向审计——在 5 轮的反审轮数上限内未收敛。

Test Plan（非阻断）：src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory。

收敛姿态下延后（第 9 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 3 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[wenshao]

@qwen-code /resolve

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Qwen Code did not run conflict resolution for this request.

PR #9596 does not currently have merge conflicts with main.

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

2 Suggestion-level finding(s) this review confirmed are already reported on this PR and are not repeated:

• Fix-witness weld test pins the format for role '1a' only; the chunk-agent builder's FINDING_FORMAT weld unpinned — already recorded as deferred in rounds 4/6/8 and confirmed already-reported in round 9 (review 4999879804)
• Ordinal weld test never exercises streak 13 — already recorded as deferred in round 4 and re-confirmed in round 9 (review 4999879804)

Not reviewed: build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally.

Not reviewed: reverse audit — did not converge within the reverse-audit round cap of 5.

Test Plan (not a blocker): src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 10, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:704 — [probe] convergence input has no seam test at the submit boundary
• packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.ts:1009 — [probe] ungated union restore resurrects or downgrades churn state from a stale own marker over a newer file

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

本轮确认的 2 条建议级发现已在 PR 上报告过，不再重复发布（列表见上方英文部分）。

未审查：build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally。

未审查：反向审计——在 5 轮的反审轮数上限内未收敛。

Test Plan（非阻断）：src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory。

收敛姿态下延后（第 10 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 2 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

Not reviewed: build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally.

Not explored to full depth (tool budget reached): chunk 1: none (the only skipped action — executing the new vitest file — was skipped because the shared worktree has no node_modules; static verification above covers th….

Test Plan (not a blocker): src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 11, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.ts:1153 (+3 locations) — [review] three new churn-seam docblocks contradict the mechanism they document (anonymous-advance carry claim ×2, census-strip claim ×1)

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

未审查：build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally。

未探索到全部深度（达到工具调用预算）：chunk 1：none (the only skipped action — executing the new vitest file — was skipped because the shared worktree has no node_modules; static verification above covers th…。

Test Plan（非阻断）：src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — no such file or directory。

收敛姿态下延后（第 11 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 1 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

[wenshao]

@qwen-code /triage

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Sandboxed verification: ✅ passed — merge-ready (agent verdict) - workflow run

Ran the PR in an isolated, token-free container: A/B against the base build, mock-free harness assertions, targeted gates. Advisory evidence for human reviewers — not a review, an approval, or a CI check.

Scripted assertions: 57 passed · 0 failed · 57 total

Flakiness gate: ✅ 7 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

中文 — 判定：✅ 通过 · 可合入（agent 判定）

沙箱验证在隔离、无凭证的容器中执行了该 PR 的代码（与 base 构建 A/B 对照、无 mock harness 断言、定向门禁）。仅作为评审证据，不构成评审、批准或 CI 检查。

脚本断言：57 通过 · 0 失败 · 57 总计

抖动门：✅ 7 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

Verification report

PR 9596 deep verification — round 1

Verdict: merge-ready — scripted assertions 57 pass / 0 fail / 57 total; verified head a0d09e0830729e0014b74101637eb7e896bd699c (git rev-parse HEAD^2), base b455bad5e55b0734ab7424012e39dba1e781ffd9 (HEAD^1 of the merge-ref checkout).

中文摘要

结论：merge-ready。57 项脚本化断言全部通过，无意外失败。

• A/B 结论：核心机制（非收敛裁决）在 head 侧 20 个单元中全部按设计工作——连续第二轮越过门槛（≥半数归因、≥4 条首次出现）时以 REQUEST_CHANGES 上报阻塞项；首轮普查被拒绝；测量收敛清零、无法测量原样携带、不可能普查（induced>fresh、fresh 超过本轮全部上报）被拒绝；伪造的侧文件/标记 streak 在两处读缝都被钳制到轮次；在「体量字段被字节预算丢弃」的档位上 churnRounds 存活而发现清单完整。base 侧 17 个单元证明该机制不存在且输入完全惰性，无普查时的组装修辞与 base 逐字节一致（向后兼容成立）。见 01-ab-adjudication-head-vs-base.png。
• 变异矩阵：13/13 守卫被各自的命名测试击杀，且每个失败都是预期的行为断言（引用了 expected/actual），无幸存者；未变异套件全绿（1085 cli + 28 core + 72 run-ledger）。见 03-mutation-matrix-13-of-13-killed.png。
• findings：无。两条信息性说明见正文（作者声明的「既有失败」在本容器不复现；本地侧文件伪造的「提前一轮」上界与代码文档一致且远端可写面已被剥离+钳制守住）。
• 未覆盖：逐 commit 归因（浅检出 depth 2）、门槛线上触发频率（上线后才能测量）、SKILL Step 6 模型侧归因质量、finder brief 子句的独立变异、全仓 gate、真实 /review 端到端（无网络/令牌）。

Central claim and A/B proof

Central claim: composeReview owns a non-convergence mechanism — it reads a
per-round census (fresh/induced), carries a churnRounds streak across rounds
through the ledger marker and the side file, and on the second round counted
against the bar (half-or-more induced, at least 4 fresh) files a deterministic,
un-anchored body Critical that escalates the event to REQUEST_CHANGES — while
refusing round-1 and context-unavailable censuses, refusing censuses past
everything the round reports, carrying (never resetting) the streak on unmeasured
rounds, and clamping forged streaks to their round at every read seam.

The A/B drives the built dist/ of each arm through real multi-round pipelines
(side file → compose → marker recovery → side file), with no mocks and no shared
workspace dependency on the changed path (packages/core TS is untouched by this
PR — only skill markdown — so the base arm resolving @qwen-code/qwen-code-core
through the root node_modules symlink into the head tree cannot move any cell;
asserted via realpath before running).

Cell	Oracle	head	base
S1: three consecutive above-bar censuses (5/3, 6/3, 8/5)	marker streak / blocker / event	streak 0→1→2, blocker filed round 3, REQUEST_CHANGES, text names both counts ("Of the 8 defects round 3 newly identified, 5 were introduced… the 2nd round counted")	no blocker, no streak, all rounds
S2: measured below-bar census (6/1) after streak 1	streak resets	streak absent, no blocker	n/a (inert)
S2b: next above-bar round after the reset	restarts at 1	streak 1, no blocker	inert
S3a–e: absent / below-minimum (3/3) / malformed / induced>fresh (4/5) / zero-pair census	streak CARRIED, nothing filed	5/5 carry, 0 blockers	inert
S4a: census fresh 9 > reported 2	refused as impossible	carried, no blocker	inert
S4b: same census (9/9) with 9 drafts	arms	streak 2, blocker	inert
S4c: ceiling sums drafts + bodyCriticals + deferrals (4+3+2 = 9)	arms	streak 2, blocker	inert
S4d: streak 9 beside a measured below-bar round	still resets	reset, no blocker	inert
S5: forged side file {round:1, churnRounds:9999} + one above-bar census	clamp bounds the forgery	files at streak 2, text says "the 2nd round", never "10000th" (documented one-round-early bound for a locally planted file)	no mechanism
S6: no-census round 2 compose	body bytes	COMMENT, sha 25fdb5cb…	byte-identical sha
S7/S7b: forged marker streak 9999 at round 2; non-integer 2.7	parseLedger clamps/drops	2; dropped	n/a
S8: marker sized to the volume-shed rung (26 findings × 78-char titles, 8181 B)	volume sheds, streak and findings survive	posted/prevPosted/fresh/floor shed, churnRounds:2 kept, 26/26 findings	same rung, no churnRounds written
S8b: deep overrun (50 findings, 7884 B)	streak rides the final rung	25 dropped, streak kept	n/a

Witness: evidence/01-ab-adjudication-head-vs-base.png (all 38 cells as printed),
evidence/02-head-cells-streak-and-blocker.png (the filed blocker text verbatim +
guard cells). Raw observations: logs/head-scenarios.json, logs/base-scenarios.json;
adjudicator: adjudicate.mjs.

The flip the mechanism exists to produce — "a churning PR's third round reads
This pull request is not converging… instead of filing a third round of derived
findings" — happens on head and is structurally impossible on base (the input field
does not exist there), so the A/B is load-bearing in both directions, including the
backward-compatibility claim: with no census, head and base compose byte-identical
bodies (the one difference an earlier cut found was this harness's own tmpdir path
leaking into the coverage notice — fixed by pinning the path, not a PR behavior).

Corrections

None — first round; no earlier report or bot comment to correct.

Findings

No blocking findings. Two informational notes, in severity order:

1. (info) The claimed pre-existing failure does not reproduce in this container.
   The test plan says run-ledger.test.ts > refuses to append over a ledger it could not read "fails on this machine at a clean checkout as well". The file is
   byte-identical between base and head (git diff HEAD^1..HEAD --stat does not
   touch it) and it passes here: 72/72 at head. The author's wording scopes the
   failure to their machine (likely permission-dependent — this container runs as
   root, which changes what "could not read" can be induced); nothing in this PR
   moves it.
2. (info, bounded as designed) A locally planted side file can bring the blocker
   one honest round early. S5 proves the bound: {round:1, churnRounds:9999}
   clamps to the file's round (1), so one honest above-bar census reaches the bar
   and the text correctly says "2nd" rather than "10000th". This matches the
   mechanism's documented threat model: the side file is local to the machine
   running the review, while the remotely writable surface (posted marker bodies)
   reaches it only through recoverLedger/persistRecoveredLedger, which strip
   churn from foreign winners (M6) and clamp the carried streak through
   streakOf + round (M4, M5, M9) — all four mutations killed below. No exploit
   demonstrated beyond the documented bound; remote planting was disproved by
   the strip/clamp mutations going red exactly where a foreign streak would ride.

Targeted gates (affected workspaces, at head)

Suite	Result
packages/cli: compose-review, lib/ledger, findings, pr-context, pr-context-persist, agent-prompt	1085/1085 (468 + 60 + 118 + 123 + 27 + 289)
packages/core: bundled review SKILL.test.ts	28/28
packages/cli: lib/run-ledger.test.ts (pre-existing-failure claim)	72/72

Mutation matrix (vacuity + guard proof)

Each guard the PR introduces was deleted or gutted in a scratch copy of the head
source, the suite that should catch it was run, and the tree was restored via git
(dirty-check clean after every mutation). 13/13 killed, 0 survivors, and every
red run failed the intended behavioral assertion (expected-vs-actual quoted in the
logs), never an import or fixture error:

#	Guard removed	Suite result	Killed by
M1	filing loses this-round-above-bar guard	1 failed / 467 passed (468)	never files the blocker ON a below-minimum census — "expected '[Critical] This pull request is n…' not to contain 'is not converging'"
M2	census not refused past all reported	2 failed / 466 passed	refuses a census that out-counts the round's own reports + pins the three-channel sum on BOTH non-drafted channels
M3	blocker pushed BEFORE the model-criticals capture	1 failed / 467 passed	rides the GATE channel, so it owes no verifier and caps nothing
M4	parseLedger streak clamp removed	1 failed / 59 passed (60)	clamps a recovered streak to the marker's own round
M5	side-file streak clamp removed	1 failed / 467 passed	clamps a side-file streak to the file round, as the marker read does
M6	foreign-winner churn strip removed	2 failed / 121 passed (123)	drops the churn state from ANOTHER account, keeping the work list — "expected 4 to be undefined"
M7	round-1 census refusal removed	1 failed / 467 passed	cannot arm itself on round 1, whatever the side file says — "expected 1 to be undefined"
M8	bar >= becomes >	1 failed / 467 passed	sets the bar at half or more, over a round big enough to have one
M9	carryFileChurn round clamp removed	1 failed / 26 passed (27)	reads the carried streak through the ledger reader, not verbatim — "expected 9999 to be 5"
M10	fixWitness acceptance removed	1 failed / 117 passed (118)	keeps fixWitness, and keeps it distinct from witness
M11	streak nested in the sheddable volume tier	1 failed / 59 passed	keeps the streak past the rung where the VOLUME itself goes — marker missing "churnRounds":3
M12	SKILL.md Fix witness clause deleted	1 failed / 27 passed (28)	pins the fix-witness mandate in all three of its halves
M13	context-unavailable refusal removed	1 failed / 467 passed	refuses a census under context-unavailable, symmetric with round 1 — body contains the blocker it must not

M11 is the discriminating placement mutation: nesting the streak inside the volume
block still passes the first-squeeze test, and only the rung where posted itself
sheds separates the correct placement from the wrong one — the PR's own test does
exactly that, and the mutation proves it. Witness:
evidence/03-mutation-matrix-13-of-13-killed.png; per-mutant vitest logs:
logs/mut-M*.txt; mutation definitions: mutate.py, runner: matrix2.sh.

Secondary claim: fixWitness acceptance criterion

Driven through the built validateFindings on both arms (fixwitness-probe.mjs,
adjudicated 6/6): head round-trips fixWitness and fix_witness, carries N/A
verbatim, and a finding without the field still validates (never gates
reporting); base silently drops the field and validates the same finding unchanged.
The posted-comment sentence ("ask for the mutation that proves it") lives in SKILL
Step 7 prose (line 1027) and is pinned by SKILL.test.ts (M12 kills the deletion).

Not covered

• Per-commit attribution — the checkout is depth 2 (merge commit, base tip, PR
  head only; rev-list HEAD^1..HEAD^2 returns 1 at the graft, the snapshot lists
  13 commits). The aggregate HEAD^1..HEAD diff is what was verified.
• Threshold firing frequency in practice — measurable only after landing, as
  the description itself states; constants verified against their stated intent
  (bar, minimum, streak), not against live data.
• Model-side attribution quality of the SKILL Step 6 fix-induced rule — the
  deterministic half (census cross-check, streak, blocker) is fully verified; the
  model's judgment of "traced to the change that answered a previous entry" is
  prompt behavior outside this job's reach. This round reproduces the shape the
  mechanism consumes, not the model behavior that produces it.
• Independent mutation of the agent-prompt FINDING_FORMAT Fix-witness line —
  its pin ran green in the gate (agent-prompt.test.ts, 289 tests); only the SKILL.md
  half got a deletion mutation (M12).
• Repo-wide gates (lint/typecheck/full suite) — only the affected workspaces'
  suites ran; the PR's own CI covers the rest.
• A live /review end-to-end — no network/GitHub token in this container by
  design.
• The claimed pre-existing run-ledger.test.ts failure on the author's machine —
  not reproducible here (passes at head; file untouched by the PR), so no base-arm
  A/A was run for it.

Methodology

Environment: the CI verify container (node:22-bookworm, Node v22.23.2) at
refs/pull/9596/merge, npm ci + npm run build pre-run at head. Base arm:
git worktree add tmp/base-tree HEAD^1 with only packages/cli rebuilt
(npm run build in the worktree, tsconfig paths resolve against base sources);
node_modules resolves up to the repo root, whose @qwen-code/qwen-code-core
symlink points into the head tree — clean control because this PR changes no core
TS (only SKILL.md/DESIGN.md/SKILL.test.ts), asserted via readlink -f
before running. Harnesses (churn-scenarios.mjs, adjudicate.mjs,
fixwitness-probe.mjs, mutate.py, matrix2.sh, all in this artifact dir)
import the compiled dist of the arm under test and drive real side-file round
trips — no stubs of verified code. Mutations were exact single-occurrence string
replacements asserted at apply time, each restored with git checkout -- and a
clean-git status check. Raw logs: logs/ (per-cell scenario JSONs,
adjudication outputs, per-mutant vitest transcripts, gate tails).

Flakiness gate log

rounds=5 files=7 skipped=0
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/utils/findings.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/utils/findings.test.ts
file packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: (cd packages/core) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts


per-file results (P=pass F=fail I=infra-exit, one letter per run):
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/utils/findings.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: PPPPP

verdict: pass
summary: 7 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

--- per-invocation detail (full copy in the artifact) ---
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/utils/findings.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/utils/findings.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/utils/findings.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/utils/findings.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/agent-prompt.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/ledger.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/utils/findings.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)

Evidence images

Harness scripts and raw logs are in the workflow run artifacts (7-day retention).

— Qwen Code · sandboxed verification

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

LGTM, looks ready to ship. ✅

[doudouOUC]

Independent review at a0d09e08 — all four standing Criticals verified addressed; approving

87 threads read as unresolved on this PR, but none of them is resolved — the reviewing account never resolves threads here, so the flag carries no signal and I ruled on each Critical against the code instead. Eleven Criticals, four of them anchored at live lines with no author reply, which is where I spent the time.

The four live Criticals

C1 — two fix-induced findings under one id fail the round (SKILL.md:802) — fixed. The guardrails paragraph now carries the cap the finding asked for: "one re-report per original id per round: when two distinct new defects trace to the same previous entry, the first takes the id and the second takes a fresh R<round>-<n>", plus the census consequence ("Count the second in fresh but not induced"). That closes the path into validateFindings' duplicate-id throw, which is still there and still pinned.

C5 — same-round union wiped this account's own streak (ledger.ts:186) — fixed. The union branch now restores churn explicitly (...pickChurnState(bestOwn.ledger) at pr-context.ts:1036), and CHURN_FIELDS is a separate group from VOLUME_FIELDS rather than relying on the volume tier — which is what the field's own docblock demands when it says the streak must not ride in the tier that sheds first.

C6 — side-file streak escaped the round clamp (ledger.ts:711) — fixed, on both sides. prevLedgerFacts now clamps on read (Math.min(streakOf(prev.churnRounds) ?? 0, round)), and the carry at pr-context.ts:1384 clamps on write (Math.min(carriedStreak, recovered.ledger.round)). A planted churnRounds: 9999 can no longer reach the bar off one honest census, and the two seams cannot disagree about the same number.

C7 — census denominator omitted the duplicate-dropped channel (compose-review.ts:1345) — resolved, but by moving the rule, not the code. This one is worth naming precisely because it is easy to mis-read as unfixed: reportedThisRound still counts only drafted comments, body Criticals and deferrals. What changed is the SKILL census rule, which now explicitly excludes duplicate-dropped findings from fresh — "they RESTATE a defect an earlier round identified (the duplicates paragraph DISCLOSES the confirmation; it is not a fourth reporting channel)" — and names the same three channels the module cross-checks against. So the finding's premise ("a model that counts them in fresh follows the rule as written") no longer holds. That is a legitimate close, and the residual is benign in the safe direction: the check is one-sided, and an over-count is refused into carry, which delays a reset rather than filing a blocker.

The seven outdated Criticals all trace to seams the diff has since restructured — ownMarkerRead (pr-context.ts:797/1068/1381) is the mechanism behind the R10-1/R10-2 replies, and I confirmed the code matches what those replies describe rather than taking the replies on trust: the anonymous path sheds both groups, and the identity-known carry fires only on ownMarkerRead === false.

The one thing still true — and I would fix it here

The bot deferred "three new churn-seam docblocks contradict the mechanism they document" at this head. It is right, and I can pin it:

• persistRecoveredLedger's JSDoc (~pr-context.ts:1154) still says an anonymous recovery keeps "the findings … (and the cumulative churn streak carries with them — an unmeasured round carries)". The code does the opposite now: recoveredOut is withoutChurn(withoutVolume(...)) when identity is unknown, and carryFileChurn is gated on identityKnown. The comment describes the pre-reversal behaviour.
• stripChurnState / pickChurnState (~1517, 1530) describe removing "its convergence streak and census". The ledger no longer carries a census — CHURN_FIELDS is ['churnRounds'] alone, and a test pins that it is.

It is Suggestion severity and I am not blocking on it, but I would rather it land in this PR than as a deferral, for a reason specific to this seam: the carry-versus-shed direction has been reversed at least twice across rounds — the author's own R10-2 reply argues it is "safe to reverse rather than a third oscillation" — and these docblocks are the only durable record of which direction is intended. A comment asserting the opposite of the code, at exactly the line that flip-flopped, is the mechanism by which the next round reverses it again. Two comment edits, no behaviour change.

The other live Suggestion I would not lose is findings.ts:409: the fixWitness docblock claims two mechanical readers, and there are none — git grep finds the field declared, parsed and re-emitted in findings.ts and read nowhere else in production. Its real readers are SKILL prose (pinned by SKILL.test.ts:676), which is a fine design for a field the agent consumes; the docblock just overstates what enforces it.

Where I land

Approving. Every Critical is addressed at this head, CI is green, and at round 11 the convergence posture says land Criticals and record the rest rather than widen the diff again. House style is clean — no any (the one grep hit is the word in a comment), no cross-package relative imports, tests collocated.

Procedurally: reviewDecision still reads CHANGES_REQUESTED from the review at 910c700ad3, three commits behind this head, while the same account has since approved a0d09e08 — so the blocking state is stale rather than substantive.

Not verified by me: the suites did not run locally (no node_modules in my worktree), so the green figures are CI's and the author's, not mine; my evidence is the four Criticals' mechanisms traced end to end at this head. Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and I did not cover it either.

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Reviewed the latest feedback — no changes needed. Why, point by point: · 已审阅最新反馈——无需改动。逐点说明原因如下：

Autofix round: verification only — no code changes this round

Both Critical findings from review round 10 (R10-1 rc:3836031780, R10-2 rc:3836031782) were already fixed at HEAD by commit a0d09e0 ("fix(review): part "reset" from "not recorded" at the churn seams"). This round verified that fix with execution evidence instead of taking the claim on authorship, and both findings are now recorded as resolved in the code (resolved-comments.txt). Verification is source-blind: the probes below ran against the real recoverLedger + persistRecoveredLedger, first on the pre-fix source, then at HEAD.

Defects reproduced on the pre-fix source (910c700, the commit the review ran against)

• R10-1: with the account's own marker absent from the walk, the identity-known write dropped the side file's standing churnRounds: 2 whenever a foreign marker at a strictly higher round won — received undefined where the carry contract requires 2. Reproduced in BOTH named variants: own review absent entirely, and own review walked but its marker unparseable (sawOwnReview true, no own marker read).
• R10-2: during an identity outage the anonymous advance kept the stale churnRounds: 2 even though the winning marker was this account's own measured reset (a below-bar round stamps no churnRounds, so reset and stranger are the same bytes with no me) — received 2 where the reset must land as "not recorded". This is exactly the one-round-early blocker arming the finding describes.
• The fix commit's six new/reversed tests are also red against the pre-fix source (the anonymous-advance assertion reversal, the carry, the reader/clamp, both ownMarkerRead flag tests, and the anonymous whole-write shed), so the round's changed tests demonstrably fail pre-fix, as the verification gate requires.

Fix confirmed at HEAD (a0d09e0)

• The same probes pass: R10-1 carries the file's streak (clamped, read through the ledger's own reader) only when no own marker was read, in both variants; R10-2 sheds the streak with the volume on the anonymous advance, degrading to late-rather-than-early as the mechanism requires. The production call site passes the recoverLedger result through unchanged, so ownMarkerRead is wired end-to-end.
• Mutation probes on the new guards — each mutant red, confirming every added guard has its own witness: negating the ownMarkerRead === false carry gate → 6 tests fail; removing withoutChurn from the anonymous advance → 2 fail; inverting ownMarkerRead in recoverLedger → 4 fail; dropping the round clamp → 1 fails; bypassing the streakOf reader → 1 fails.
• Removing the identityKnown term from the carry leaves the suite green, matching the code's documented defence-in-depth claim: the block is unreachable with an unknown identity today, and the behaviour it backstops is pinned one level out (the two tests the anonymous-advance mutant reddens). That term is an explicit, documented maintainer decision and was left alone.

Triage of the remaining feedback

• rv:5000177349 [CHANGES_REQUESTED]: its actionable content was the two inline Criticals, verified resolved above. The "not reviewed" disclosures (Integration Tests job skipped in CI; reverse audit at its round cap) are process disclosures, not change requests. The touched seam is exercised directly through the real functions by unit tests, not only through the bundled CLI, so the integration harness was not run this round.
• Test Plan note (src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — "no such file or directory"): the file exists at packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts; the note resolved the relative path from the repo root. Run from packages/cli it is green — 54 tests passed this round.
• The two items deferred under the convergence posture (compose-review.ts:704 submit-boundary seam test; pr-context.ts:1009 ungated union restore) are recorded by the review itself as "not requested in this round" and are not Critical — left untouched.
• The Deferred non-Critical feedback section is an audit record under Critical-only mode — untouched.
• rv:5000206380 / rv:5000206425 are the maintainer's fix replies on the two finding threads; this round's measurements agree with them.

Verification

• npm run build — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed
• npm run lint — passed
• cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts — 153 passed (27 + 126)
• cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts — 690 passed
• Pre-fix reproduction and mutation probes — focused Vitest runs over the same suites as described above; probe file removed after verification, working tree left clean at HEAD

中文说明

Autofix 本轮：仅验证——本轮无代码改动

第 10 轮审查的两条 Critical 发现（R10-1 rc:3836031780、R10-2 rc:3836031782）已由 HEAD 上的 commit a0d09e0（"fix(review): part "reset" from "not recorded" at the churn seams"）修复。本轮不轻信该结论，而是用执行证据验证了这个修复，两条发现现已记录为「已在代码中解决」（见 resolved-comments.txt）。验证是来源无关的：以下探针直接通过真实的 recoverLedger + persistRecoveredLedger 运行——先在修复前的源码上运行，再在 HEAD 上运行。

在修复前源码（910c700，即审查所针对的 commit）上复现缺陷

• R10-1：当本账号自己的 marker 不在遍历列表中时，只要轮次严格更高的外部 marker 胜出，身份已知写入就会丢弃 side file 上已成立的 churnRounds: 2——携带契约要求写入 2 的位置实际收到 undefined。该发现点名的两种形态均已复现：自身 review 完全不存在；自身 review 被遍历但其 marker 无法解析（sawOwnReview 为 true，但没有读到任何自身 marker）。
• R10-2：身份故障期间，即使胜出的 marker 正是本账号自己实测的清零轮，匿名推进仍保留了过期的 churnRounds: 2——低于门槛的轮次不写入任何 churnRounds，所以在 me 缺失时「清零」与「陌生人的 marker」是同一段字节——清零本应以「未记录」落地，实际收到 2。这正是该发现所描述的「阻塞项提前一轮被武装」的形态。
• 修复 commit 新增/反转的 6 个测试在修复前源码上同样为红（匿名推进断言反转、携带、读取器/钳制、两个 ownMarkerRead 标志测试、匿名整体写入的卸下），证明本轮改动的测试在修复前确实失败，满足验证门槛的要求。

在 HEAD（a0d09e08）上确认修复

• 同一组探针通过：R10-1 仅在未读到任何自身 marker 时（两种形态下）携带文件自身的连续计数（经 ledger 自己的读取器读取并钳制）；R10-2 在匿名推进时把连续计数与体量组一并卸下，按该机制的要求降级为「宁晚上报、绝不上报错」。生产调用点原样传递 recoverLedger 的结果，因此 ownMarkerRead 已端到端接通。
• 对新守卫的变异探针——每个变异体均为红，确认每个新增守卫都有自己的见证：取反 ownMarkerRead === false 携带门 → 6 个测试失败；移除匿名推进中的 withoutChurn → 2 个失败；反转 recoverLedger 中的 ownMarkerRead → 4 个失败；去掉轮次钳制 → 1 个失败；绕过 streakOf 读取器 → 1 个失败。
• 移除携带中的 identityKnown 项后整套测试仍为绿，与代码中「纵深防御」的文档化声明一致：该块在身份未知时今天不可达，其兜底的行为在上一层被钉住（即匿名推进变异体能染红的那两个测试）。该项是维护者明确且已记录在案的决定，本轮未改动。

其余反馈的分诊

• rv:5000177349 [CHANGES_REQUESTED]：其可执行内容就是上述两条内联 Critical，已验证解决。「未审查」披露（CI 中 Integration Tests 作业被跳过；反向审计达到轮数上限）属于流程披露，不构成改动请求。本次触及的接缝由单元测试直接通过真实函数验证，并非只能经打包后的 CLI 验证，因此本轮未运行集成测试集。
• Test Plan 备注（src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts — "no such file or directory"）：该文件存在于 packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts；备注是把相对路径从仓库根目录解析所致。在 packages/cli 下运行通过——本轮 54 个测试全绿。
• 收敛姿态下延后的两项（compose-review.ts:704 提交边界接缝测试；pr-context.ts:1009 未设门的 union 恢复）被审查本身记录为「本轮不要求修改」，且均非 Critical——未触碰。
• Deferred non-Critical feedback 一节是仅处理 Critical 模式下的审计记录——未触碰。
• rv:5000206380 / rv:5000206425 是维护者在两条发现线程上的修复答复；本轮的实测结果与之一致。

验证

• npm run build — 通过
• npm run typecheck — 通过
• npm run lint — 通过
• cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts — 153 通过（27 + 126）
• cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/pr-context-persist.test.ts src/commands/review/pr-context.test.ts src/commands/review/lib/run-ledger.test.ts src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts — 690 通过
• 修复前复现与变异探针——在同上测试套件上执行的聚焦 Vitest 运行；验证完成后探针文件已删除，工作树保持干净并停留在 HEAD

Deferred non-Critical feedback

Critical-only mode is active: 5 change-producing rounds are complete. The workflow excluded the non-Critical feedback below from this round's actionable sections; the items remain open for human follow-up. Maintainer feedback is deferred only after its author has used 2 regular feedback batches in this window's Critical-only tail; authors at that budget, if any, are named below. (@qwen-code /retry starts a fresh counting window.)

• Review by @qwen-code-ci-bot: feat(review): ask each fix for its test, and rule on non-convergence #9596 (review)
• Review by @qwen-code-ci-bot: feat(review): ask each fix for its test, and rule on non-convergence #9596 (review)
• PR comment by @qwen-code-ci-bot: feat(review): ask each fix for its test, and rule on non-convergence #9596 (comment)

中文说明

已进入仅处理 Critical 的模式：已完成 5 个产生改动的轮次。本轮可执行区域已排除下方非 Critical 反馈；这些条目保持开放，留待人工跟进。维护者反馈仅在其本人于本窗口 Critical-only 阶段已使用 2 批常规反馈预算后才会延后；达到预算的作者（如有）在下方点名。（评论 @qwen-code /retry 可开启新的计数窗口。）

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[yiliang114]

Post-merge follow-up — two observations from a fresh read of the convergence machinery, neither blocking (both below the bar for the severity classes they touch), both cheap if a follow-up round is wanted:

1. The recovery seam guards forging but not erasure (pr-context.ts ~1036/~1379). A recovered own marker's churn state is authoritative in both directions: present it restores, absent it reads as this account's measured below-bar reset. The R10 hazard comment names "deleted, edited until it stopped parsing" and handles the unparseable variant — deletion is covered (no own marker → ownMarkerRead === false → carryFileChurn preserves the side-file streak). The gap is the parsed-but-churn-absent shape: a marker that parses with the churnRounds field removed makes pickChurnState return {} at the union restore, and the carry fail-safe does not engage because it is gated on ownMarkerRead === false. Each subsequent round then starts from streak 0, and since filing needs two consecutive above-bar rounds, a re-edit per round keeps the ruling unreachable on exactly the churning PRs the mechanism exists for. The realistic actor is narrow — on GitHub only the bot account can edit its own review body, and compromised bot credentials dominate this impact — hence hardening, not a security blocker. Cheap symmetric fix: make reset a signal, not an absence — a below-bar round stamps churnRounds: 0 via an explicit sentinel instead of omission (serializeLedger already omits zero), and a parsed own marker carrying no churn field carries the side-file streak instead of resetting it.

2. The census integers are unvalidated model output (compose-review.ts ~1342-1396). The induced/fresh pair is shape-checked (induced <= fresh, integers, fresh > reportedThisRound → null) but nothing ties induced to anything compose-review can see — Finding carries no attribution field, so the count is taken on faith. Both directions have an effect, though bounded ones: a captured round claiming induced >= fresh/2 for two consecutive rounds files a bogus not-converging blocker against a healthy PR (human-visible, human-overridable — the mechanism is advisory, hence observation rather than escalation); a round claiming induced = 0 hides genuine churn. A cheap mechanical bound exists because the attribution rule already requires induced findings to be carried-id re-reports: tally findings posted under prior-round ids and cross-check induced <= that tally (or require an attribution field compose-review counts itself), restoring the model-observes/module-decides split for the census too.

The rest verified clean on a correctness pass: the streak case matrix holds exactly as documented (including the 0-new edge — fresh < CHURN_MIN_FRESH disarms before any ratio, so no division hazard), the composed blocker rides the deterministic channel captured before the verifier gate so it owes no verifier and caps nothing while still counting into openCriticals, and the carried-streak clamp to the marker's own round bounds planted side files. The below-minimum carry-not-reset behavior is read as the documented contract, not a missed decay.

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Released in v0.22.2.