feat(review): add the persistently-critical convergence advisory (land-with-residual-risk) by wenshao · Pull Request #9526 · QwenLM/qwen-code

wenshao · 2026-08-20T01:29:56Z

What this PR does

This adds a convergence-exit advisory to the review compose step: when the carried telemetry proves the review loop is stuck on Criticals — Criticals stood in the previous round's work-list and stand again this round, while the two-round window of FIRST-TIME findings is present and not falling, and the standing Critical backlog is not shrinking — compose-review surfaces a single recommendation, land-with-residual-risk, telling the operator the loop is unlikely to self-converge via the severity floor and that the exit is a maintainer risk-acceptance decision. The advisory appears on three surfaces — a structured field on the composed JSON, a low-retention non-capping disclosure in the review body, and a terminal RESIDUAL-RISK: line beside the existing VOLUME: telemetry — each carrying a blank three-column residual-risk inventory scaffold (attack surface · attacker-dependency · blast radius) for the maintainer to complete, and each explicitly advisory-only: it never moves the event, never caps the verdict, never blocks the post.

Merged with #9461, which landed the loop-settling observation in the same module: it answers "is this loop settling, and if not, why", and its handling advice ends at a posture the operator can still change — including dropping the round to a Critical-only floor. This advisory picks up where that advice has already been taken and the loop still does not settle. Both render, so this side is named for its exit throughout rather than for the word they share: the composed field is residualRisk (the observation keeps convergence), the terminal line is RESIDUAL-RISK: beside the observation's CONVERGENCE:, and the paragraph leads with "Residual risk:" rather than "Convergence:". One name over two different paragraphs is a body — and a terminal record — that no reader and no parser can split apart. The floor-engagement conjunct reads #9461's criticalFloorInEffect (the strict enforcement reading, since the claim is about Suggestions having actually left the posting set), and the persistence half reads the same recovered work-list the observation clusters over, so the two features cannot disagree about what the previous round held.

The window measures FIRST-TIME findings rather than the posting total, and for the reason #9461's observation measures its own trend the same way: Step 6 re-posts every still-standing ledger Critical under its original id, so the total only ever rises and a loop whose new findings are collapsing still posts flat-or-rising totals. The standing Critical backlog rides beside it as a veto, because the fresh window alone is blind to a reviewer finding nothing new for two rounds while the author clears blockers — fresh 0 against fresh 0, which "not falling" would read as stuck.

Why it's needed

The severity floor converges a healthy loop: from the floor onward, Suggestions stop posting and the volume falls to the Criticals, then to zero as those get fixed. But a security-sensitive PR under adversarial review never reaches that state — its Criticals never clear, the floor engages, the Suggestions stop, and the posting volume flatlines at the Critical count instead of falling. Every convergence exit that exists today (land-and-defer, fix-pipeline, re-anchor) assumes the loop can reach a Critical-free state, so none of them names this shape, and the loop just keeps opening rounds. This PR supplies the missing exit: a pure-facts detector plus the one recommendation that fits, so the operator is told to land with the residual risk instead of reviewing again. Evidence that this shape is real and that the floor does not close it: PR 9226 ran twelve rounds, Critical-only from round six yet finding new Criticals every round, and ended only when a maintainer froze the loop and merged.

Reviewer Test Plan

How to verify

The signal is pure and unit-tested; the wiring is integration-tested through the real compose command.

Signal semantics: cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts — nine tests pin the full firing conjunction and each degraded arm individually (prior round unrecovered, prior work-list clean, no Criticals this round, a missing volume, a shrinking volume, and the flat-zero edge).
End-to-end wiring: cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts -t '#9410' — two tests drive the real compose command over a carried-ledger fixture: the persistently-critical fixture must surface the advisory on all three surfaces (JSON field, body disclosure, terminal line), and a shrinking-volume fixture must stay completely silent.
Full regression: cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/ — 4297 pass, 1 skipped; npm run typecheck and the ESLint run on the touched files are clean.

Evidence (Before & After)

N/A — non-UI change (compose-review telemetry/advisory). Behavior is covered by the unit and integration tests above; the persistently-critical shape requires a multi-round carried ledger and is not practical to reproduce manually.

Tested on

OS	Status
🍏 macOS	✅
🪟 Windows	⚠️
🐧 Linux	⚠️

Environment

Unit and integration tests via npx vitest on macOS (npm run dev toolchain); CI covers Windows and Linux.

Risk & Scope

Main risk or tradeoff: a false fire would tell the operator the loop is stuck when it is still converging. This is mitigated by requiring the full conjunction (a Critical in the previous round's work-list AND this round AND an engaged floor on both rounds AND a present, non-falling window of first-time findings AND a standing-Critical backlog that is not observably shrinking) and by the advisory being strictly informational — even a false fire cannot move the event, cap the verdict, or block the post. Every input degrades open, so a missed advisory (fail-safe) is possible but a false fire requires the whole conjunction.
Not validated / out of scope: the residual-risk inventory is a blank scaffold for the maintainer — the tool deliberately does not judge attack surface, attacker-dependency, or blast radius, and pre-filling it would be a verdict it has no authority to make. Under body-overflow pressure the disclosure is rank-1 trim and yields first; the operator still receives the advisory on the terminal and in the composed JSON.
Breaking changes / migration notes: none. The change is additive; when the shape does not fire the composed output is byte-identical to before (no residualRisk field, no disclosure, no RESIDUAL-RISK: line).

Linked Issues

Closes #9410. Refs #9278 (this fills the persistently-critical exit in that design's recommendation menu; the other menu items remain open there).

中文说明

这个 PR 做了什么

给评审 compose 步骤新增一个收敛出口建议：当携带的遥测证明评审循环卡在 Critical 上——上一轮工作清单里有 Critical、本轮依然有，、两轮「首次发现」窗口存在且未下降、且未决 Critical 积压没有减少——compose-review 会给出唯一建议 land-with-residual-risk，告诉操作者这个循环不太可能靠 severity floor 自行收敛，出口是 maintainer 的风险接受决定。建议出现在三个面上——composed JSON 的结构化字段、评审正文里一个低保留的非封顶披露、以及紧挨现有 VOLUME: 遥测的终端 RESIDUAL-RISK: 行——每一面都附带一份空白的三栏残余风险清单脚手架（攻击面 · 攻击者依赖性 · blast radius）供 maintainer 填写，并且都明确声明仅为建议：绝不移动事件、绝不封顶裁决、绝不阻断发布。

与 #9461 合并：那个 PR 在同一模块落了循环收敛观察——回答"这个循环在收敛吗，不收敛的话为什么"，它的处理建议止步于操作者还能改的姿态，包括把本轮降到 Critical-only floor。本 PR 的建议接在"那条建议已经被采纳、循环依然不收敛"之后。两者都会渲染，所以本侧全程按它的出口命名，而不是按两者共用的那个词：composed 字段是 residualRisk（观察保留 convergence），终端行是 RESIDUAL-RISK:，与观察的 CONVERGENCE: 并列，段落引导词是"残余风险："而非"收敛情况："。一个名字盖住两个不同段落，正文和终端记录都会变成读者与解析器都拆不开的东西。floor 咬合这一合取项读 #9461 的 criticalFloorInEffect（严格的执法读法——因为该主张是关于 Suggestion 确实已被移出发布集），持久性那一半读的是观察用来聚类的同一份恢复工作清单，所以两个特性不会对"上一轮持有什么"产生分歧。

窗口度量的是首次发现而非发布总量，理由与 #9461 的观察度量自身趋势时相同：Step 6 会把每条仍未决的台账 Critical 以原 id 重发，因此总量只增不减——一个新发现正在塌缩的循环，其总量依然持平甚至上涨。未决 Critical 积压作为否决项并列其旁，因为仅靠 fresh 窗口看不见「连续两轮没有新发现、而作者正在清理阻断项」这一形态：它是 fresh 0 对 fresh 0，被「未下降」读成了卡死。

为什么需要

severity floor 能让健康循环收敛：floor 生效后 Suggestion 不再发布，音量降到 Critical，再随着 Critical 被修复降到零。但安全敏感 PR 在对抗式评审下永远到不了那个状态——它的 Critical 清不完，floor 咬合后 Suggestion 停了，发布音量却在 Critical 数量上躺平而不是下降。今天存在的每个收敛出口（land-and-defer、fix-pipeline、re-anchor）都假设循环能到达"无 Critical"态，所以没有一个能命名这个形状，循环就只能一直开新轮。本 PR 补上缺失的出口：一个纯事实检测器 + 唯一匹配的建议，让操作者被告知"带着残余风险合入"而不是再开一轮评审。这个形状真实存在、floor 无法关闭它的证据：PR 9226 跑了十二轮，从第六轮起 Critical-only 却每轮都发现新 Critical，最终只有一位 maintainer 冻结循环并合入才结束。

评审者测试计划

如何验证

信号是纯函数、有单测；接线通过真实 compose 命令做了集成测试。

信号语义：cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts——九个测试钉住完整触发合取，并逐个钉住每个降级臂（上轮未恢复、上轮工作清单无 Critical、本轮无 Critical、音量缺失、音量收缩、以及 flat-zero 边界）。
端到端接线：cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts -t '#9410'——两个测试用携带台账的 fixture 驱动真实 compose 命令：persistently-critical fixture 必须在三个面都披露建议（JSON 字段、正文披露、终端行），音量收缩的 fixture 必须完全静默。
全量回归：cd packages/cli && npx vitest run src/commands/review/——4297 通过、1 跳过；npm run typecheck 与对改动文件的 ESLint 均干净。

证据（前后对比）

N/A——非 UI 改动（compose-review 遥测/建议）。行为由上述单测与集成测试覆盖；persistently-critical 形态需要多轮携带台账，手工复现不现实。

测试环境

系统	状态
🍏 macOS	✅
🪟 Windows	⚠️
🐧 Linux	⚠️

环境（可选）

macOS 上经 npx vitest 的单测与集成测试（npm run dev 工具链）；CI 覆盖 Windows 与 Linux。

风险与范围

主要风险或权衡：误触发会在循环其实还在收敛时告诉操作者"卡住了"。通过要求完整合取（上轮工作清单有 Critical 且本轮有、两轮 floor 均已咬合、首次发现窗口存在且未下降、且未决 Critical 积压未观察到减少）以及建议严格仅告知来缓解——即使误触发也不能移动事件、封顶裁决或阻断发布。所有输入 degrade open，所以漏报（fail-safe）可能，但误报需要整个合取同时成立。
未验证 / 范围外：残余风险清单是给 maintainer 的空白脚手架——工具刻意不判断攻击面、攻击者依赖性、blast radius，预先填写将构成它无权做出的裁决。正文溢出压力下该披露是 rank-1 trim、最先让位；操作者仍会在终端和 composed JSON 里收到建议。
破坏性变更 / 迁移说明：无。改动是纯增量；形态不触发时 composed 输出与之前逐字节一致（无 residualRisk 字段、无披露、无 RESIDUAL-RISK: 行）。

关联 issue

Closes #9410。Refs #9278（本 PR 补上该设计建议菜单中的 persistently-critical 出口；菜单其余项仍在该 issue 下开放）。

The severity floor converges a healthy loop — Suggestions stop posting and the volume falls to the Criticals, then to zero as those get fixed. But a loop whose Criticals never clear — the security-sensitive PR under adversarial review — posts Criticals every round forever: the floor engages, the Suggestions stop, and the volume flatlines at the Critical count instead of falling. Nothing before this said so. This adds the shape detector and its ONE recommendation: - lib/convergence.ts — `convergenceAssessment` computes one fact from the carried telemetry (Criticals stood in the previous round's work-list AND stand again this round, with the two-round posting window present and not shrinking) and, when it fires, returns the `land-with-residual-risk` recommendation. Pure data, never authority: no threshold, no blocking, no merge/close — every input degrades OPEN, so absence is fail-safe, never a suppressed finding. - compose-review wires it: `prevLedgerFacts` now recovers the previous work-list's Critical presence beside the round and volume; the assessment surfaces on three surfaces — a structured `convergence` field on the composed JSON, a rank-1 non-capping body disclosure, and a terminal CONVERGENCE line — each advisory-only and self-disclaiming, with a blank residual-risk inventory scaffold (attack surface · attacker-dependency · blast radius) for the maintainer's risk-acceptance decision. The exit the floor cannot provide: when the loop is provably stuck on Criticals, the tool names the maintainer's decision (merge, carrying the residual risk) instead of opening another round. Advisory only — it never blocks this review. Closes the convergence-exit gap in #9278; evidence and design in #9410.

qwen-code-ci-bot · 2026-08-20T01:30:34Z

✅ Qwen Triage finished — view run. See the stage comments in this thread for the result.

✅ Qwen Triage 已完成 —— 查看运行。结果见本线程中的各阶段评论。

qwen-code-ci-bot · 2026-08-20T01:34:47Z

Re-run gate against ad56909 — one branch commit since the last pass at 925d41a (the round-11 fix: gate-Critical dedup plus the truncated-reading caveat), and one merge of main (6fa3e76) that brought the churn/non-convergence mechanism into the same files and, in its resolution, fixed one of the four stale rank comments the last pass flagged. All stages re-ran against the new head.

Template: complete ✓ — unchanged; all sections present, bilingual summary, Closes #9410 linked.
Problem: observed, not theoretical — and the receipt keeps growing. Design issue Design: convergence exit path for persistently-Critical review loops — PR 9226 evidence and a land-with-residual-risk recommendation #9410 documents the shape; PR 9226 ran twelve rounds and ended only by a maintainer freeze-and-merge; this PR's own thread is past round eleven in the same shape, and the new commit is literally the loop's round-11 findings — a gate Critical compounding and a truncated reading published unqualified — fixed reproduction-first.
Direction: aligned. Still the missing exit in the Design: /review publish-time convergence advisory — telemetry, diagnosis, and operator-owned posting surfaces #9278 recommendation menu; still strictly advisory — it cannot move the event, cap the verdict, or block the post. Complements the feat(review): tell the author why a review loop is not settling #9461 observation already in main without overlapping it (residualRisk / RESIDUAL-RISK: kept distinct from convergence / CONVERGENCE:).
Size: 8 files — ≈ 780 production lines (compose-review 378, convergence 328, save-artifact 72, bundled review skill doc 2), ≈ 2,022 test lines. The author is a repo maintainer (admin permission, verified via API), and AGENTS.md exempts maintainer-authored PRs from the two-tier gate; the numbers are recorded for transparency, not as an escalation.
Approach: scope still right. The new commit adds a locator-based dedup for model re-posts of gate-regenerated Criticals (keeping the gate's provenance-tracked copy) and a prevTruncated caveat that discloses — without deciding anything — that two of the advisory's readings came off a known-incomplete work-list. No unrelated changes or drive-by refactors; all eight files serve the feature. The merge of main coexists cleanly — the PR's delta against main is still exactly the same eight files.
Risk: no changed file matches the repo's revert-correlated high-risk paths — no elevated risk signals.

Moving on to code review. 🔍

中文说明

针对 ad56909 的 re-run 门检——自上次 925d41a 之后，分支上落了一个提交（第 11 轮修复：gate Critical 去重 + 截断读取限定），并合并了一次 main（6fa3e76，把 churn/非收敛机制带进同一批文件，其解算还顺带修掉了上次点名的四处陈旧梯度注释之一）。所有阶段已对新 head 重跑。

模板：完整 ✓——未变；各节齐全、双语摘要、已关联 Closes #9410。
问题：已观测到，不是理论问题——且收据还在增长。设计 issue Design: convergence exit path for persistently-Critical review loops — PR 9226 evidence and a land-with-residual-risk recommendation #9410 记录了形态；PR 9226 跑了十二轮、只靠 maintainer 冻结合入收场；本 PR 自己的线程也以同样形态过了第十一轮，而新提交正是把循环第 11 轮产出的两个发现——gate Critical 复利、未加限定的截断读取——按先复现后修复的方式修掉。
方向：对齐。仍是 Design: /review publish-time convergence advisory — telemetry, diagnosis, and operator-owned posting surfaces #9278 建议菜单中缺失的出口；仍严格仅为建议——不能移动事件、不能封顶裁决、不能阻断发布。与已在 main 中的 feat(review): tell the author why a review loop is not settling #9461 观察互补不重叠（residualRisk / RESIDUAL-RISK: 与 convergence / CONVERGENCE: 保持区分）。
规模：8 个文件——生产逻辑约 780 行（compose-review 378、convergence 328、save-artifact 72、捆绑评审技能文档 2），测试约 2,022 行。作者是仓库维护者（admin 权限，经 API 核实），AGENTS.md 对维护者本人提交的 PR 豁免两级门检；行数仅作透明记录，不构成升级。
方案：范围仍合理。新提交为「模型重发 gate 再生成的 Critical」加了基于 locator 的去重（保留 gate 那份有出处可溯的副本），并新增 prevTruncated 限定：只披露、不裁决——说明建议中有两条读取来自一份已知不完整的工作清单。无无关改动或顺手重构；八个文件全部服务于该特性。main 的合并共存干净——PR 对 main 的差集仍恰为同样八个文件。
风险：改动文件均未命中本仓库与回滚相关的高风险路径——无升级风险信号。

进入代码审查。🔍

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max

_{Reviewed at ad569092bee52a6c6d978637414b91a68baeaf29 · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

qwen-code-ci-bot · 2026-08-20T01:42:52Z

Code review (re-run, head `ad56909`)

No blockers. One commit since the last pass — the round-11 fix — and I read it against the head source, not just the commit message:

R11-2 (gate Critical compounding) is fixed at the right layer. withoutGateReposts matches the gate line's LOCATOR — the `path`:line CODE it opens with, before the first em dash, backticks normalised, the carried id stripped through the ledger's own LEDGER_ID_READBACK — not the whole string, so a re-worded re-post still dedupes (pinned by test), and a different finding at a different line survives (also pinned). The gate's copy is the one kept: it is re-derived from a report bound to this diff's hash, while the model's copy is untrusted prose that [lint] does not exempt from verification. The dedup runs BEFORE modelBodyCriticals is captured in the body composer, so a dropped re-post cannot keep pulling the unverified-blocker cap (the cap test pins this), and the marker's work-list applies the same rule through the same function. The body composer's second gate invocation was folded into the first and reused.
R11-1 (truncated reading) is a disclosure, not a gate — correctly. prevTruncated is no conjunct: I checked the conjunction at head and it is unchanged (same six guards, same degrade-open behaviour). What changes is what the paragraph may CLAIM — the two readings taken off the predecessor list's ABSENCES ("no Suggestion, so the floor was enforcing"; "the backlog is not shrinking") lean toward firing when the byte budget shortened that list, and the rendered advisory now says so, in both languages, body and terminal line alike (one shared rendering). The old blanket "every input degrades open" comment is replaced by the stated exception. The artifact validator reads absence as "not disclosed", so an artifact written before the field existed still saves (pinned).
The merge of main (6fa3e76) coexists cleanly. It brought the churn/non-convergence mechanism into the same file; the PR's delta against main is still exactly its eight files, and the two features touch none of the same predicates. The merge resolution also fixed one of the four stale rank comments flagged last pass — the Bi.trim interface doc now reads advisory rank 0 / disclosures rank 2 / observation rank 3.

Two non-blocking items:

The relocated channel is not covered by the dedup, and the body's dedup covers it anyway — an asymmetry. In composeReviewBody the dedup runs on bodyCriticals AFTER the relocated Criticals joined it, so a relocated entry whose locator matches a gate finding is dropped from the body, while the marker dedupes only the model's own list and keeps the relocated entry. The collision is narrow (a deferred lint Critical the gate regenerates in the same round), the finding itself is not lost (the gate's copy posts), the advisory bias is fail-safe (an inflated prevCriticals leans toward suppression), and the next round's dedup catches the re-posted pair — but for one round the body and the marker disagree about the entry, and the relocatedCount arithmetic, taken pre-dedup, can misattribute one of the model's own Criticals into the relocated bucket for the verification cap. Worth a follow-up: either run the marker's relocated channel through the same statement, or exempt relocated entries from the body's dedup — a maintainer's call, not a merge blocker.
Three of last pass's four stale rank comments remain (the merge fixed only the Bi.trim doc): the PersistedVerdict doc in save-artifact.ts still says "convergence is rank 0 … while this one is rank 2" (inverted at head — observation rank 3, advisory rank 0); the validator comment there still says "rank 2 sheds before the not-reviewed disclosures" (the advisory is rank 0); and the plan-gate disclosure test in compose-review.test.ts still says its blocks "carry trim: 3" and goesWithRank3 (they carry trim 2). Comments only, zero runtime impact.

CI test evidence (PR's own checks on the reviewed commit, via API)

Zero failures and zero pending pull_request workflow runs on this head: both PR CI workflows (Qwen Code CI, Security Checks) completed green, with the PR gate Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x) success beside the security checks. The macOS/Windows unit jobs and the CLI integration job are skipped, not failed — ci.yml gates them to merge_group (verified in the workflow definition).

CI on ad56909 — all checks completed:

Check	Conclusion
Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)	success
web-shell E2E Smoke (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)	success
Desktop Shell (ubuntu-22.04)	success
Desktop Shell (windows-2022)	success
Post Coverage Comment (ubuntu-latest, 22.x)	success
Classify PR	success
Dependency CVE audit	success
Secret scan (TruffleHog)	success
Test (macos-latest, Node 22.x)	skipped (merge-queue-only by CI policy)
Test (windows-latest, Node 22.x)	skipped (merge-queue-only by CI policy)
Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox)	skipped (merge-queue-only by CI policy)

Sandboxed verification would settle the remaining claim: @qwen-code /verify — whether the new dedup and caveat tests actually pin the change (suite red with the dedup removed or the caveat unwired) is not observable from a green run alone; the live multi-round shape itself is out of reach of every lane and settles only by landing.

中文说明

代码审查（re-run，head `ad56909`）

无阻断项。上次之后只有一个提交——第 11 轮修复——我是对着 head 源码读的，不是只读提交说明：

R11-2（gate Critical 复利）修在了正确的层。 withoutGateReposts 匹配的是 gate 行的 LOCATOR——行首的 `路径`:行号 CODE（取第一个破折号之前、反引号归一、携带的 id 经台账自己的 LEDGER_ID_READBACK 剥掉）——而不是整串，因此换了措辞的重发依然能去重（有测试钉住），另一行不同的发现不受影响（同样钉住）。保留的是 gate 的副本：它由绑定本 diff 哈希的报告再生成，而模型的副本是不受信散文、[lint] 并不豁免其验证。去重发生在 body 组合器捕获 modelBodyCriticals 之前，被丢弃的重发不会继续拉动未验证阻断项封顶（封顶有测试钉住）；标记工作清单经同一函数应用同一规则。body 组合器里的第二次 gate 调用已并入第一次、复用。
R11-1（截断读取）是披露而非门禁——方向正确。 prevTruncated 不是合取项：已在 head 上核对，合取式未变（同样六条守卫、同样 degrade-open）。变的是段落能声称什么——两条从前一轮清单「缺席」读出的结论（「没有 Suggestion，故 floor 在执法」「积压没有减少」）在字节预算截短清单时偏向触发，渲染出的建议现在双语、正文与终端行一致地如实说明（同一份渲染）。旧的一刀切「每个输入都 degrade open」注释换成了明说的例外。产物校验器把缺省读作「未披露」，字段出现之前写下的产物仍可保存（有测试钉住）。
main 的合并（6fa3e76）共存干净。 它把 churn/非收敛机制带进同一文件；PR 对 main 的差集仍恰为八个文件，两个特性不触碰彼此的谓词。合并解算还修掉了上次点名的四处陈旧梯度注释之一——Bi.trim 接口 doc 现在是建议 rank 0 / 披露 rank 2 / 观察 rank 3。

两项非阻断：

迁移（relocated）通道不在去重范围内，而 body 的去重实际上覆盖了它——两侧不对称。 composeReviewBody 的去重发生在迁移 Critical 加入 bodyCriticals 之后，因此 locator 撞上 gate 发现的迁移条目会从正文被丢弃，而标记一侧只对模型自有清单去重、保留迁移条目。碰撞条件很窄（被延迟的 lint Critical 在同一轮又被 gate 再生成），发现本身不丢（gate 副本会发布），建议一侧的偏差是 fail-safe（抬高的 prevCriticals 偏向抑制），且下一轮的去重会接住重发的成对条目——但这一轮里正文与标记对该条目说法不一，且去重前取的 relocatedCount 尾部算术可能把一条模型自有 Critical 误划进迁移桶、影响验证封顶。值得跟进：要么让标记侧的迁移通道也走同一语句，要么让迁移条目豁免 body 的去重——由 maintainer 定夺，不构成合入阻断。
上次点名的四处陈旧梯度注释还剩三处（合并只修掉了 Bi.trim doc）：save-artifact.ts 的 PersistedVerdict doc 仍写「convergence 是 rank 0……而本字段是 rank 2」（与 head 相反——观察 rank 3、建议 rank 0）；同文件校验器注释仍写「rank 2 在未审查披露之前让位」（建议现在是 rank 0）；compose-review.test.ts 的 plan-gate 披露测试仍写其块「均带 trim: 3」与 goesWithRank3（现在是 trim 2）。仅注释、零运行时影响。

CI 测试证据（经 API 读取该提交自身的 CI）

该 head 上零失败、零未决的 pull_request 工作流运行：两个 PR CI 工作流（Qwen Code CI、Security Checks）均绿，PR 门禁 Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x) 与安全检查同为 success。macOS/Windows 单测与 CLI 集成任务是 skipped 而非失败——ci.yml 把它们限定在 merge_group（已核对工作流定义）。沙盒验证可以闭合剩余主张：@qwen-code /verify——新增的去重与限定测试是否真的钉住改动（移除去重或解除限定后套件应红）无法仅从绿运行看出；跨轮实况形态超出所有通道能力，只有合入后才能落定。

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max

_{Reviewed at ad569092bee52a6c6d978637414b91a68baeaf29 · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

qwen-code-ci-bot · 2026-08-20T01:44:03Z

Confidence: 4/5 — clean review, no blockers; the only items are the one narrow relocated-channel asymmetry and the three stale rank comments, all named in Stage 2 and all fixups, not doubts.

Stepping back: this commit is the loop's own round-11 findings, fixed reproduction-first, and reading it against the head source confirms both fixes land at the right layer. The compounding gets a locator-keyed dedup that keeps the provenance-tracked gate copy — regenerated from a report bound to the diff's hash, so the model's re-post is structurally redundant, and keeping it instead would have pulled the unverified-blocker cap on a linter-proven blocker. The truncated reading gets a disclosure rather than a gate, which is the right call: restoring the completeness gate would silence the advisory on exactly the deep-work-list rounds it exists for, and the two absence-derived readings are the two that lean toward firing, so the paragraph now says so — in both languages, body and terminal alike. My independent read of the problem matches the approach; I did not find a simpler path it missed.

On the two mechanical reasons prior runs deferred rather than approved, and this one should say so plainly rather than silently change course:

The Stage 0 escalation does not cap this PR. The author is a repo maintainer — admin permission, verified via API — and AGENTS.md exempts maintainer-authored PRs from the two-tier gate. The core touch is a one-line skill-doc sync plus its test pin. Awareness is satisfied by the author; deferring further on that ground would be ritual, not protection.
The standing CHANGES_REQUESTED is the review loop's own gap-disclosure state from this same account — its deferred items were "recorded, not requested in this round", and no human review has requested changes. This approval supersedes it as this account's latest review state, deliberately.

The non-blocking items stay on the record for a follow-up, none gating this merge: the relocated-channel dedup asymmetry (narrow, fails safe, self-heals next round — a maintainer's call on whether to unify the two statements) and the three stale rank comments (comments only). They are the kind of thing that would be a fixup commit, not a reason to hold a correct, well-tested change.

There is a point in favor of landing worth saying plainly, same as the last pass: this PR's own thread is a live specimen of the persistently-critical shape it detects — eleven-plus rounds, Criticals standing and re-standing, the autofix side flatlining into autofix/needs-human. The advisory exists so the next loop in this shape is told the exit instead of opening another round; this one has earned its own advice.

CI at the reviewed head: every pull_request workflow run green, nothing pending — so the approval lands now, pinned to the reviewed commit. ✅

中文说明

置信度：4/5——干净的审查、无阻断项；唯一的遗留是一条很窄的迁移通道不对称与三处陈旧梯度注释，均已在 Stage 2 点名，属于修复项而非怀疑。

退一步看：本提交正是循环自己第 11 轮的发现，按先复现后修复的方式处理；对着 head 源码核对，两处修复都落在正确的层。复利问题用按 locator 归键的去重解决，保留有出处可溯的 gate 副本——它由绑定 diff 哈希的报告再生成，模型的重发在结构上冗余，若反而保留它，会让一个已被 linter 证明的阻断项持续拉动未验证封顶。截断读取用披露而非门禁解决，这也是正确选择：恢复完整性门禁恰好会在建议存在的深工作清单轮次把它噤声，而那两条从「缺席」读出的结论正是偏向触发的两条，段落现在双语、正文与终端一致地如实说明。我对问题的独立判断与该方案一致，没有找到它遗漏的更简路径。

关于此前几轮「缓批而非批准」的两个机械原因，本次明说而非悄悄改向：

Stage 0 升级不再封顶本 PR。 作者是仓库维护者——admin 权限，经 API 核实——而 AGENTS.md 对维护者本人提交的 PR 豁免两级门检。核心触点只是一行技能文档同步及其测试钉。知悉已由作者本人满足；再以此为由缓批只是仪式，不是保护。
未决的 CHANGES_REQUESTED 是评审循环自身以同一账号作出的缺口披露状态——其延迟项明确「记录在案、本轮不请求」，也没有任何人类评审请求过修改。本批准作为本账号的最新评审状态，刻意将其覆盖。

非阻断项留档待后续跟进，均不构成本次合入门槛：迁移通道去重不对称（很窄、fail-safe、下一轮自愈——是否统一两处语句由 maintainer 定夺）与三处陈旧梯度注释（仅注释）。这类问题属于修复提交的范畴，不是扣住一个正确且测试充分改动的理由。

有一点值得直说，与上次相同：这个 PR 自己的线程就是它所检测形态的活体样本——十一轮以上、Critical 反复未决、autofix 一侧躺平成 autofix/needs-human。建议的存在，就是为了让下一个处于此形态的循环被告知出口，而不是再开一轮；这一条已经挣得了它自己的建议。

被审查 head 上的 CI：每个 pull_request 工作流运行均绿、无未决——因此批准现在落下，并钉在被审查的提交上。✅

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max

_{Reviewed at ad569092bee52a6c6d978637414b91a68baeaf29 · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

github-actions · 2026-08-20T01:49:23Z

Code Coverage Summary

Package	Lines	Statements	Functions	Branches
CLI	85.21%	85.21%	90.62%	84.26%
Core	88.23%	88.23%	89.89%	86.8%

CLI Package - Full Text Report

-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
File               | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | Uncovered Line #s 
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
All files          |   85.21 |    84.26 |   90.62 |   85.21 |                   
 src               |   85.83 |    81.72 |   88.13 |   85.83 |                   
  cli.ts           |   95.68 |    84.11 |     100 |   95.68 | ...60-561,565-566 
  gemini.tsx       |    73.4 |    78.04 |   80.76 |    73.4 | ...1338-1342,1469 
  ...ractiveCli.ts |   88.25 |    82.33 |   89.06 |   88.25 | ...3147,3153,3219 
  ...liCommands.ts |   88.93 |    83.21 |      80 |   88.93 | ...97-599,615,721 
  ...ActiveAuth.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 66-80             
 ...cp-integration |   73.07 |    75.85 |   92.26 |   73.07 |                   
  acpAgent.ts      |   71.81 |     74.8 |   91.37 |   71.81 | ...58,13263-13265 
  ...k-reporter.ts |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 81,84,119,141     
  authMethods.ts   |      92 |       60 |     100 |      92 | 33-34             
  ...heap-probe.ts |   97.39 |    96.66 |     100 |   97.39 | 243,264-265       
  errorCodes.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-skills.ts |     100 |    88.23 |     100 |     100 | 17,32             
  generation.ts    |    97.1 |    81.25 |     100 |    97.1 | 109,112           
  ...figuration.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...DirContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ersistence.ts |   94.95 |    92.24 |     100 |   94.95 | ...13-118,227-228 
 ...tegration/live |    97.5 |       88 |   92.85 |    97.5 |                   
  ...en-context.ts |   95.74 |    82.35 |     100 |   95.74 | ...0,66-67,99-100 
  ...structions.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ak-to-user.ts |   96.66 |      100 |    87.5 |   96.66 | 37-38             
  ...task-tools.ts |   98.97 |      100 |   88.88 |   98.97 | 201-202           
 ...ration/service |    97.1 |    95.89 |   93.75 |    97.1 |                   
  filesystem.ts    |    97.1 |    95.89 |   93.75 |    97.1 | ...22-123,246-247 
 ...ration/session |   91.03 |    86.54 |   95.71 |   91.03 |                   
  Session.ts       |   90.36 |    85.23 |   95.05 |   90.36 | ...11,12538-12542 
  ...entTracker.ts |   96.81 |    89.36 |      90 |   96.81 | 137-143,222       
  ...projection.ts |   98.85 |    91.59 |     100 |   98.85 | 234,250,262       
  ...stop-guard.ts |     100 |    98.07 |     100 |     100 | 37,127            
  ...eplay-page.ts |   94.36 |    87.01 |     100 |   94.36 | ...39,343,423,427 
  ...y-replayer.ts |   83.41 |    93.22 |   94.11 |   83.41 | ...29-147,265-267 
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-40              
  ...ssionUtils.ts |   89.76 |    87.32 |     100 |   89.76 | ...54-270,326-328 
  ...oal-update.ts |   98.61 |    97.29 |     100 |   98.61 | 64                
  ...lure-guard.ts |   98.32 |    97.72 |     100 |   98.32 | 294-295,340-341   
  tasksSnapshot.ts |    94.3 |     87.5 |     100 |    94.3 | 65-71             
  ...on-tracker.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ssion/emitters |   95.62 |    92.73 |   97.05 |   95.62 |                   
  ...ageEmitter.ts |   95.25 |    93.54 |     100 |   95.25 | ...08-115,128-129 
  PlanEmitter.ts   |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 66                
  base-emitter.ts  |   78.26 |    77.77 |     100 |   78.26 | 23-24,26-28       
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-10              
  ...ll-emitter.ts |   98.57 |    94.84 |     100 |   98.57 | 75-76,394-395     
 ...ession/rewrite |    91.8 |    89.13 |   94.44 |    91.8 |                   
  LlmRewriter.ts   |    82.4 |     86.2 |     100 |    82.4 | ...,88-89,166-170 
  ...Middleware.ts |   96.96 |    88.09 |     100 |   96.96 | 144,152-154       
  TurnBuffer.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 src/agent-view    |      89 |    81.57 |   91.53 |      89 |                   
  attach-lease.ts  |     100 |    96.96 |     100 |     100 | 173               
  ...t-cli-argv.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ged-detach.ts |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 40,64             
  protocol.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  pty-host-env.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...st-process.ts |   87.99 |     77.6 |   94.28 |   87.99 | ...1219,1309-1311 
  pty-host.ts      |   84.51 |    85.04 |   90.69 |   84.51 | ...14-516,531-532 
  ...sor-client.ts |   80.38 |    72.54 |   77.41 |   80.38 | ...22-626,652-656 
  ...or-process.ts |   96.61 |    89.47 |   84.61 |   96.61 | 129-130,150-151   
  ...sor-runner.ts |    84.9 |     75.6 |      85 |    84.9 | ...44,468,471-481 
  ...sor-server.ts |   85.71 |    83.06 |   95.45 |   85.71 | ...67-468,471-488 
  ...isor-store.ts |   97.73 |    81.16 |     100 |   97.73 | ...92,594,607,643 
  ...nal-bridge.ts |   93.98 |    91.54 |   83.33 |   93.98 | 228-238           
  ...r-sideband.ts |   95.37 |    86.44 |     100 |   95.37 | 203-204,228-233   
 src/commands      |   90.36 |     77.2 |   65.62 |   90.36 |                   
  auth.ts          |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 11,14             
  channel.ts       |   55.55 |      100 |       0 |   55.55 | 18-22,30-40       
  extensions.tsx   |   96.77 |      100 |      50 |   96.77 | 39                
  hooks.tsx        |   66.66 |      100 |       0 |   66.66 | 20-24             
  mcp.ts           |   95.45 |      100 |      50 |   95.45 | 31                
  review.ts        |   98.85 |      100 |      50 |   98.85 | 98                
  serve.ts         |   88.95 |    74.21 |     100 |   88.95 | ...84-887,899,910 
  sessions.ts      |     100 |      100 |      50 |     100 |                   
  update.ts        |   98.13 |    94.44 |   66.66 |   98.13 | 82-83             
 ...mmands/channel |   89.08 |    88.57 |   90.64 |   89.08 |                   
  channel-cwd.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...l-registry.ts |   94.88 |    95.49 |      90 |   94.88 | ...20-323,368-371 
  ...entry-path.ts |      75 |       50 |     100 |      75 | 8-9               
  config-utils.ts  |   95.88 |    96.35 |     100 |   95.88 | ...08-213,271-274 
  configure.ts     |    14.7 |      100 |       0 |    14.7 | 18-21,23-84       
  daemon-worker.ts |   93.91 |    85.61 |   94.33 |   93.91 | ...1264,1271-1272 
  loop-runtime.ts  |   91.66 |      100 |      50 |   91.66 | 15,22             
  ...classifier.ts |   98.53 |    96.66 |     100 |   98.53 | 115-116,161       
  ...tact-store.ts |   93.51 |    87.65 |     100 |   93.51 | ...71,288-289,337 
  pairing.ts       |      75 |      100 |      50 |      75 | 22-28,59-70       
  pidfile.ts       |   95.55 |       90 |     100 |   95.55 | ...50-251,315-316 
  proxy.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  reload.ts        |    77.5 |    86.95 |      75 |    77.5 | 72-84,93-97       
  runtime.ts       |   82.43 |    86.44 |     100 |   82.43 | ...87-191,251-253 
  set.ts           |   75.72 |    85.71 |      50 |   75.72 | 65-83,111-116     
  start.ts         |    85.8 |    82.17 |      88 |    85.8 | ...85,591-594,606 
  ...ure-format.ts |   93.65 |    82.45 |     100 |   93.65 | ...42,48-49,74-75 
  status.ts        |   78.57 |    59.25 |   66.66 |   78.57 | ...36-137,150-161 
  stop.ts          |   57.83 |    82.35 |      50 |   57.83 | ...3,74-76,85-111 
 ...nds/extensions |   88.85 |    87.91 |   87.09 |   88.85 |                   
  consent.ts       |   72.53 |    90.32 |   42.85 |   72.53 | ...86-142,157-163 
  disable.ts       |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 30                
  enable.ts        |     100 |    91.66 |     100 |     100 | 38                
  install.ts       |   82.95 |    81.57 |      75 |   82.95 | ...96-199,202-211 
  link.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  list.ts          |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 18                
  new.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  settings.ts      |   99.15 |      100 |   83.33 |   99.15 | 151               
  sources.ts       |   93.42 |    87.09 |   92.85 |   93.42 | ...4-66,96-98,167 
  uninstall.ts     |   74.57 |       40 |   66.66 |   74.57 | 45-47,60-67,70-73 
  update.ts        |   96.71 |    97.05 |     100 |   96.71 | 114-118           
  utils.ts         |   75.63 |    57.14 |     100 |   75.63 | ...30-134,136-140 
 ...les/mcp-server |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  example.ts       |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-60              
 ...amples/starter |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  example.ts       |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-64              
 src/commands/mcp  |   90.31 |    84.61 |   83.33 |   90.31 |                   
  add.ts           |    99.3 |    96.07 |     100 |    99.3 | 154-155           
  approve.ts       |   76.19 |     87.5 |   66.66 |   76.19 | ...,89-99,114-124 
  list.ts          |   93.15 |    84.84 |      80 |   93.15 | ...78-180,198-199 
  reconnect.ts     |   78.85 |    66.66 |   85.71 |   78.85 | 42-55,169-191     
  remove.ts        |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 21-25             
 ...ommands/review |   91.15 |     89.8 |   92.14 |   91.15 |                   
  agent-prompt.ts  |   94.85 |    92.85 |   97.91 |   94.85 | ...3227,3562-3642 
  base-tree.ts     |   77.02 |    80.76 |   77.77 |   77.02 | ...63-384,386-399 
  capture-local.ts |      70 |     90.9 |      75 |      70 | 112-116,163-194   
  ...k-coverage.ts |   50.71 |       35 |   66.66 |   50.71 | ...40-245,279-289 
  cleanup.ts       |   92.18 |    89.69 |    90.9 |   92.18 | ...1061,1063-1064 
  comment-body.ts  |   67.85 |    87.09 |   66.66 |   67.85 | ...30,157,159-164 
  ...ent-status.ts |   93.19 |    84.61 |   83.33 |   93.19 | 302,442,573-593   
  ...ose-review.ts |   97.11 |    93.74 |   98.52 |   97.11 | ...5378-5422,5697 
  cost-ledger.ts   |   94.58 |     94.4 |   81.25 |   94.58 | ...53-654,694-704 
  drive.ts         |    94.1 |    92.85 |   92.85 |    94.1 | ...80-782,787-789 
  extract-step.ts  |   91.36 |    90.62 |   88.88 |   91.36 | ...90-707,714-729 
  fetch-diff.ts    |   73.75 |      100 |   66.66 |   73.75 | 77-97             
  fetch-pr.ts      |   97.25 |    92.05 |     100 |   97.25 | ...1548,1705-1710 
  issue-context.ts |   88.15 |     93.1 |   85.71 |   88.15 | 249-276           
  load-rules.ts    |   26.41 |      100 |   16.66 |   26.41 | ...41-153,155-156 
  match-remote.ts  |   85.55 |     92.3 |   66.66 |   85.55 | 74-79,144-150     
  meta.ts          |   79.43 |    93.75 |   66.66 |   79.43 | 123-128,147-162   
  mock-provider.ts |   95.44 |    90.25 |   89.47 |   95.44 | 145,690-709       
  parse-args.ts    |   99.48 |    95.66 |     100 |   99.48 | 567,838,894       
  plan-diff.ts     |    68.1 |      100 |   66.66 |    68.1 | 162-205           
  pr-context.ts    |   96.03 |    87.79 |     100 |   96.03 | ...2233,2333-2349 
  presubmit.ts     |   91.94 |    90.05 |   91.66 |   91.94 | ...-842,1057-1088 
  ...ish-assets.ts |    81.3 |    82.22 |   85.71 |    81.3 | ...79-483,510-556 
  ...r-findings.ts |   90.74 |    83.75 |     100 |   90.74 | ...17-422,429-430 
  repo-context.ts  |   94.62 |    90.75 |     100 |   94.62 | ...66-467,482-487 
  ...ve-anchors.ts |   78.34 |    89.28 |      75 |   78.34 | ...83-188,200-217 
  run.ts           |   82.66 |    88.54 |   94.11 |   82.66 | ...19,635-689,703 
  save-artifact.ts |    93.7 |    91.66 |   94.11 |    93.7 | ...71-574,667-670 
  scratch-tree.ts  |   90.06 |     85.1 |    90.9 |   90.06 | ...51-454,656-674 
  script-lint.ts   |   83.78 |    78.57 |   88.88 |   83.78 | ...69-783,785-807 
  submit.ts        |   94.11 |    89.38 |   94.44 |   94.11 | ...1673,1701-1738 
  test-delta.ts    |    86.4 |       92 |      60 |    86.4 | 177-208,471-479   
  test-efficacy.ts |   85.62 |    81.26 |      96 |   85.62 | ...3120,3128-3148 
  test-plan.ts     |   94.61 |    91.79 |      95 |   94.61 | ...29-832,873-874 
 ...w/__fixtures__ |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...r-default.mjs |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...der-empty.mjs |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...der-named.mjs |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...nds/review/lib |   97.34 |    94.75 |   98.74 |   97.34 |                   
  agent-briefs.ts  |      99 |      100 |      50 |      99 | 784-785           
  ...t-identity.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  anchors.ts       |     100 |    97.04 |     100 |     100 | ...39,175,184,231 
  assets.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  audit-layers.ts  |   98.67 |    96.15 |     100 |   98.67 | 288-290           
  authorization.ts |   93.48 |    93.45 |     100 |   93.48 | ...79-385,583-584 
  budget.ts        |     100 |    97.95 |     100 |     100 | 887,940           
  build-budget.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  certification.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  convergence.ts   |   99.46 |    97.17 |    90.9 |   99.46 | 590,808           
  coverage.ts      |   98.97 |    95.12 |     100 |   98.97 | ...1103,1648-1649 
  deadline.ts      |   98.03 |    91.73 |     100 |   98.03 | ...20,752,820,837 
  diff-flags.ts    |     100 |        0 |     100 |     100 | 75                
  diff-plan.ts     |   98.74 |    93.12 |     100 |   98.74 | ...48,271,297-298 
  disk.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  effort.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  failing-files.ts |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 41                
  gh.ts            |   89.53 |    95.52 |   78.94 |   89.53 | ...47,384-385,412 
  git.ts           |   96.77 |    93.93 |     100 |   96.77 | 234-235,272-273   
  heavy.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  import-graph.ts  |   96.68 |     95.4 |     100 |   96.68 | 180-182,211-212   
  ...ntal-scope.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  inline-counts.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...audit-gate.ts |     100 |     97.5 |     100 |     100 | 135               
  ledger.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  local-diff.ts    |   84.86 |    90.38 |     100 |   84.86 | ...63-473,475-483 
  ...ry-context.ts |   96.61 |    95.48 |     100 |   96.61 | ...47-450,496-499 
  md-field.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  merge-base.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  narrow-diff.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  npm-toolchain.ts |   98.23 |    95.29 |     100 |   98.23 | ...,819,1200,1217 
  path-rules.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  paths.ts         |   96.96 |       95 |     100 |   96.96 | 32-33             
  prompt-record.ts |   98.03 |    94.23 |     100 |   98.03 | 293-294,300       
  receipt.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  remote-match.ts  |   98.03 |    94.73 |     100 |   98.03 | 109-110           
  report.ts        |   92.85 |    86.66 |     100 |   92.85 | 204-205,207-211   
  ...ry-context.ts |     100 |    98.66 |     100 |     100 | 187               
  resume.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  retirement.ts    |     100 |    94.36 |     100 |     100 | ...58-559,760,917 
  review-footer.ts |   99.55 |     98.1 |     100 |   99.55 | 548-549           
  ...w-settings.ts |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 79                
  roster.ts        |     100 |    97.05 |     100 |     100 | 154,199           
  round-model.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  run-ledger.ts    |    98.2 |    93.87 |     100 |    98.2 | ...23,541,647,670 
  same-file.ts     |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 35                
  shell-quote.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  stale-bundle.ts  |   98.21 |    94.04 |     100 |   98.21 | 433,474,514-515   
  test-utils.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  toolchain.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  transcripts.ts   |   98.09 |    95.07 |     100 |   98.09 | ...92,438,707-708 
  ...pace-scope.ts |     100 |    96.96 |     100 |     100 | 186               
  workspaces.ts    |     100 |    96.85 |     100 |     100 | 222,452,499,512   
  ...ree-reader.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  worktree.ts      |   87.96 |    79.92 |     100 |   87.96 | ...1552-1553,1566 
 ...w/lib/platform |    94.2 |    86.13 |   96.77 |    94.2 |                   
  aone-client.ts   |   94.94 |     87.3 |     100 |   94.94 | ...92-293,299-302 
  aone.ts          |    91.9 |    87.23 |   93.75 |    91.9 | ...60,624-629,681 
  github.ts        |   99.08 |     75.8 |     100 |   99.08 | 249-250           
  registry.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...mands/sessions |   94.11 |    89.06 |   89.47 |   94.11 |                   
  common.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  list.ts          |   90.96 |    86.66 |   81.81 |   90.96 | 208-219,221-222   
  ps.ts            |     100 |    94.44 |     100 |     100 | 58                
 src/config        |   94.97 |    89.94 |   96.31 |   94.97 |                   
  ...l-fallback.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  auth.ts          |   89.35 |    83.56 |     100 |   89.35 | ...97-298,314-315 
  ...eMcpImport.ts |   87.91 |    81.52 |     100 |   87.91 | ...63-371,453-454 
  compile-cache.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |   89.23 |    88.84 |   83.78 |   89.23 | ...2527,2529-2537 
  ...cy-monitor.ts |      90 |    77.27 |     100 |      90 | ...72-73,90-92,98 
  ...ust-policy.ts |   83.02 |    88.88 |     100 |   83.02 | ...02-209,232-240 
  ...heme-names.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  environment.ts   |    96.5 |    93.58 |      95 |    96.5 | ...85-586,640-641 
  ...le-watcher.ts |   90.86 |    83.65 |   95.83 |   90.86 | ...23-325,370,418 
  ...resh-state.ts |   90.57 |    97.29 |   93.75 |   90.57 | 137-142,146-152   
  ...ime-reload.ts |     100 |    69.69 |     100 |     100 | ...12-113,122-123 
  hot-reload.ts    |     100 |    89.13 |     100 |     100 | 47,172-178,238    
  keyBindings.ts   |    97.4 |       50 |     100 |    97.4 | 240-243           
  ...ngsAdapter.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 64                
  ...ig-watcher.ts |   95.17 |    83.05 |     100 |   95.17 | ...78,200,292-293 
  ...er-secrets.ts |   98.97 |    96.96 |     100 |   98.97 | 85                
  mcpApprovals.ts  |   96.55 |    95.65 |     100 |   96.55 | 223-224,229-231   
  mcpJson.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcpServers.ts    |   92.85 |     87.5 |     100 |   92.85 | 46-47             
  ...idersScope.ts |      95 |    94.73 |     100 |      95 | 11-12             
  ...abledTools.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...comparison.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...n-settings.ts |   99.15 |    93.93 |     100 |   99.15 | 63                
  sandboxConfig.ts |   93.33 |    93.33 |     100 |   93.33 | ...42-147,216-217 
  session-id.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ings-cache.ts |   96.52 |    93.93 |     100 |   96.52 | 90-91,201-202     
  settings.ts      |   91.16 |    92.71 |      90 |   91.16 | ...1028,1030-1031 
  ...ingsSchema.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngsWatcher.ts |   95.54 |    88.34 |     100 |   95.54 | ...28,277-278,293 
  ...d-env-keys.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...l-settings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...paths-lite.ts |   89.47 |       88 |     100 |   89.47 | 43-44,53-54,56-57 
  ...precedence.ts |   98.79 |     92.3 |     100 |   98.79 | 62                
  ...tedFolders.ts |   92.53 |    93.54 |     100 |   92.53 | ...36-337,373-384 
 ...nfig/migration |   95.23 |    78.94 |   85.71 |   95.23 |                   
  index.ts         |   95.65 |     87.5 |     100 |   95.65 | 117-118           
  scheduler.ts     |   96.55 |       80 |     100 |   96.55 | 19-20             
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...ation/versions |   94.91 |      100 |     100 |   94.91 |                   
  ...-v2-shared.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  v1-to-v2.ts      |   81.75 |      100 |     100 |   81.75 | ...28-229,231-247 
  v2-to-v3.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  v3-to-v4.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  v5-to-v4.ts      |      96 |      100 |     100 |      96 | 94-95,99          
 src/core          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  auth.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  initializer.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  theme.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/dualOutput    |   75.08 |    67.64 |   71.42 |   75.08 |                   
  ...tputBridge.ts |   75.33 |    68.18 |   73.68 |   75.33 | ...09-410,418-421 
  ...utContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-8               
 src/export        |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-7               
 src/generated     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  git-commit.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/hooks         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...elete-hook.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/i18n          |   86.25 |    81.92 |   89.65 |   86.25 |                   
  index.ts         |   73.45 |    77.77 |      90 |   73.45 | ...70-271,294-299 
  languages.ts     |   93.07 |     92.3 |   85.71 |   93.07 | ...35,164-169,184 
  ...nslateKeys.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lationDict.ts |   93.33 |    66.66 |     100 |   93.33 | 15                
 src/i18n/locales  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ca.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  de.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  en.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  fr.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ja.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  pt.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ru.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zh-TW.js         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zh.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...nonInteractive |   80.98 |    77.27 |   84.12 |   80.98 |                   
  session.ts       |   84.97 |    76.31 |   96.07 |   84.97 | ...1048,1057-1067 
  types.ts         |    42.5 |      100 |   33.33 |    42.5 | ...31-632,635-636 
 ...active/control |   75.54 |    89.83 |      80 |   75.54 |                   
  ...rolContext.ts |    6.06 |        0 |       0 |    6.06 | 57-99             
  ...Dispatcher.ts |   91.95 |    92.98 |   88.88 |   91.95 | ...54-372,392,395 
  ...rolService.ts |    6.89 |        0 |       0 |    6.89 | 46-188            
 ...ol/controllers |   45.95 |    69.03 |   55.26 |   45.95 |                   
  ...Controller.ts |    42.4 |      100 |   83.33 |    42.4 | 101-105,140-223   
  ...Controller.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-56              
  ...Controller.ts |   55.01 |    67.14 |   58.33 |   55.01 | ...15-624,639-644 
  ...Controller.ts |   49.23 |       60 |      50 |   49.23 | ...07-108,111-121 
  ...Controller.ts |   40.64 |    68.11 |   46.66 |   40.64 | ...72-684,693-722 
 .../control/types |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  serviceAPIs.ts   |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...Interactive/io |   98.16 |    94.22 |   95.29 |   98.16 |                   
  ...putAdapter.ts |   98.02 |     93.3 |   98.07 |   98.02 | ...1433,1449-1450 
  ...putAdapter.ts |   96.22 |    91.66 |   85.71 |   96.22 | 52-53             
  ...nputReader.ts |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 67                
  ...putAdapter.ts |   98.51 |      100 |   90.47 |   98.51 | 90-91,131-132     
  ...projection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/patches       |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  is-in-ci.ts      |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-17              
 src/remoteInput   |   87.31 |    75.32 |   88.23 |   87.31 |                   
  ...utContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...putWatcher.ts |   88.01 |       76 |   93.33 |   88.01 | ...49-350,361-364 
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-8               
 src/runtime       |   99.69 |    96.26 |     100 |   99.69 |                   
  ...livery-ipc.ts |     100 |    91.17 |     100 |     100 | 94,106,134        
  ...l-delivery.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cpu-percent.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-source.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...erver-name.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-summaries.ts |   86.66 |       50 |     100 |   86.66 | 11,19             
  ...ber-errors.ts |     100 |    95.32 |     100 |     100 | 53,93-94,172,192  
  ...ls-mapping.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/serve         |   88.26 |    84.75 |   90.92 |   88.26 |                   
  ...extra-args.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tp-enabled.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-bridge.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  auth.ts          |   93.99 |     91.5 |     100 |   93.99 | ...29-430,433-435 
  ...em-adapter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  capabilities.ts  |     100 |    98.07 |     100 |     100 | 702               
  ...cp-command.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...horization.ts |   92.79 |    93.54 |    87.5 |   92.79 | 75-80,135-136     
  ...op-mcp-ipc.ts |   81.06 |    73.68 |   94.11 |   81.06 | ...37-242,267,289 
  ...nt-service.ts |    94.1 |    86.98 |     100 |    94.1 | ...75-477,484,486 
  ...-selection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ings-store.ts |   89.64 |    94.16 |   96.55 |   89.64 | ...57-269,521-524 
  ...ebhook-ipc.ts |    98.5 |     87.5 |     100 |    98.5 | 47                
  ...iagnostics.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...worker-env.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rker-group.ts |   87.27 |     85.2 |     100 |   87.27 | ...10,816-820,838 
  ...er-manager.ts |   89.39 |    83.88 |   93.33 |   89.39 | ...98,711,722-724 
  ...horization.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tartup-ipc.ts |   97.72 |    96.66 |     100 |   97.72 | 88-89             
  ...supervisor.ts |   92.54 |    84.53 |   97.14 |   92.54 | ...1489,1543-1547 
  ...e-grouping.ts |     100 |    94.28 |     100 |     100 | 71,137            
  core-runtime.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ub-session.ts |    90.9 |     78.6 |   94.73 |    90.9 | ...1001,1022-1027 
  ...tree-guard.ts |   92.89 |    87.55 |     100 |   92.89 | ...2766,2836-2840 
  daemon-logger.ts |   82.82 |    78.68 |   92.04 |   82.82 | ...1775,1802-1808 
  ...y-pressure.ts |     100 |    96.96 |     100 |     100 | 135               
  ...trics-ring.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...s-provider.ts |   68.04 |    52.77 |     100 |   68.04 | ...44-249,282-290 
  daemon-status.ts |   98.69 |    91.96 |     100 |   98.69 | ...1590,1592-1593 
  debug-mode.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  env-snapshot.ts  |   93.37 |    85.18 |     100 |   93.37 | 114-117,195-202   
  ...-scheduler.ts |   87.34 |    83.87 |     100 |   87.34 | 33-36,48-50,79-81 
  ...d-provider.ts |   92.06 |    87.09 |     100 |   92.06 | ...72,287-293,316 
  ...h-settings.ts |   94.94 |    90.41 |     100 |   94.94 | ...30,708,724,734 
  fast-path.ts     |   91.01 |    81.38 |   95.45 |   91.01 | ...34-543,609-610 
  ...ration-sse.ts |   42.55 |    33.33 |     100 |   42.55 | 23-24,30,33-56    
  health-query.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-149             
  ...e-observer.ts |   89.89 |    83.24 |      96 |   89.89 | ...11-512,541-543 
  ...back-binds.ts |     100 |    88.88 |     100 |     100 | 32                
  ...-workspace.ts |    90.9 |    85.71 |     100 |    90.9 | ...30-131,142-143 
  ...iders-edit.ts |     100 |    82.14 |     100 |     100 | 58-60,65,81       
  ...ory-picker.ts |     100 |    86.95 |     100 |     100 | 36,66,92          
  ...sion-audit.ts |     100 |      100 |   93.33 |     100 |                   
  ...nal-ledger.ts |    94.9 |    84.78 |     100 |    94.9 | ...81,302,361-362 
  rate-limit.ts    |   92.68 |    88.29 |     100 |   92.68 | ...89-291,303-305 
  ...qwen-serve.ts |   84.06 |    80.79 |   75.98 |   84.06 | ...7976,7994-7998 
  ...tup-errors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-keepalive.ts |   94.27 |    88.18 |     100 |   94.27 | ...34,538-539,578 
  ...-lifecycle.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-lifecycle.ts |   89.16 |    90.29 |   86.95 |   89.16 | ...24-325,330-334 
  server.ts        |   91.21 |    90.67 |   72.03 |   91.21 | ...2986,3016-3017 
  ...-admission.ts |   99.13 |    95.94 |     100 |   99.13 | 308-309           
  ...on-helpers.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-redaction.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t-event-id.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 12                
  ...-admission.ts |   98.71 |    89.65 |     100 |   98.71 | 68                
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-limits.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t-sessions.ts |   93.72 |    77.93 |     100 |   93.72 | ...51,854,867-869 
  ...l-resolver.ts |   90.32 |    66.66 |     100 |   90.32 | 16,45-46          
  ...ell-static.ts |   92.18 |    88.37 |     100 |   92.18 | ...21-224,267-270 
  ...ace-agents.ts |   66.13 |    70.57 |   92.68 |   66.13 | ...2246,2256-2266 
  ...generation.ts |    95.4 |    82.35 |   66.66 |    95.4 | 55-56,78,92       
  ...-git-state.ts |     100 |    91.93 |    90.9 |     100 | 161,172,202,265   
  ...ace-inputs.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ace-memory.ts |      83 |    74.54 |     100 |      83 | ...30-537,597-604 
  ...ers-status.ts |   98.58 |       79 |     100 |   98.58 | 106,134,174,177   
  ...tion-store.ts |   89.67 |    88.27 |   92.59 |   89.67 | ...91-400,411-414 
  ...e-registry.ts |   94.98 |    90.55 |     100 |   94.98 | ...67-568,575-576 
  ...e-remember.ts |   98.23 |    92.56 |     100 |   98.23 | ...36,340-345,386 
  ...te-runtime.ts |    89.4 |    90.55 |     100 |    89.4 | ...89-190,258-279 
  ...me-storage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...visibility.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...management.ts |   72.63 |    72.83 |   96.15 |   72.63 | ...88-889,896-900 
  ...lls-status.ts |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 152               
  ...reconciler.ts |   91.63 |    84.09 |     100 |   91.63 | ...71-273,306-307 
 ...serve/acp-http |   80.34 |    80.23 |    94.5 |   80.34 |                   
  ...r-registry.ts |   96.92 |    94.87 |     100 |   96.92 | 184-187           
  client-mcp-ws.ts |   54.85 |    58.62 |   72.72 |   54.85 | ...99-300,304-305 
  ...n-registry.ts |   93.03 |    84.13 |   98.52 |   93.03 | ...1624,1671-1682 
  dispatch.ts      |   75.51 |    77.21 |   93.33 |   75.51 | ...5509,5566-5572 
  index.ts         |   82.68 |    79.74 |   91.22 |   82.68 | ...2424,2510-2511 
  json-rpc.ts      |     100 |    96.96 |     100 |     100 | 92                
  ...ach-budget.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  safe-ws-send.ts  |   52.94 |    71.42 |     100 |   52.94 | 33-42,47-55       
  sse-stream.ts    |   98.26 |    88.88 |     100 |   98.26 | 87-88,117         
  ...ort-stream.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  ws-stream.ts     |   94.06 |    89.09 |     100 |   94.06 | 50,55,134,138-141 
 src/serve/auth    |   86.86 |     79.7 |   93.87 |   86.86 |                   
  device-flow.ts   |   96.35 |    80.57 |   97.61 |   96.35 | ...1358,1453,1519 
  ...w-provider.ts |   44.24 |    74.07 |   71.42 |   44.24 | ...23-284,297,301 
 ...rve/cdp-tunnel |   87.73 |    76.21 |    97.5 |   87.73 |                   
  ...r-emulator.ts |   93.27 |    77.77 |     100 |   93.27 | ...53-256,282-283 
  ...verse-link.ts |      88 |    76.19 |     100 |      88 | ...28-329,420-423 
  ...l-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cdp-ws.ts        |   76.28 |    61.29 |    87.5 |   76.28 | ...13-217,223-228 
 ...nel/acceptance |    6.12 |    57.89 |   46.15 |    6.12 |                   
  ...helpers.d.mts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  ...e-helpers.mjs |   97.64 |    70.96 |     100 |   97.64 | 22-23             
  ...mcp-smoke.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-124             
  ...cceptance.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-473             
  ...re-server.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-59              
  ...ols-smoke.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-268             
  real-tab.mjs     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-218             
  ...al-chrome.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-223             
 .../conversations |   90.17 |    85.13 |      95 |   90.17 |                   
  ...e-activity.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ime-errors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...me-manager.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-ownership.ts |   87.33 |    83.33 |   88.46 |   87.33 | ...57-558,601-602 
  ...-workspace.ts |   89.09 |    78.66 |     100 |   89.09 | ...91-292,339-340 
 src/serve/fs      |   87.77 |    82.34 |     100 |   87.77 |                   
  audit.ts         |     100 |    96.29 |     100 |     100 | 211               
  errors.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...x-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  paths.ts         |   77.64 |    74.01 |     100 |   77.64 | ...65,594-598,611 
  policy.ts        |   90.52 |    89.18 |     100 |   90.52 | 172-180           
  text-cursor.ts   |   88.23 |       90 |     100 |   88.23 | 74-77,92-95       
  ...ile-system.ts |   88.02 |    81.85 |     100 |   88.02 | ...3027,3037-3038 
 src/serve/live    |   77.17 |    69.94 |   90.43 |   77.17 |                   
  discovery.ts     |   85.89 |    81.57 |    91.3 |   85.89 | ...73-579,592-593 
  ...oordinator.ts |   82.67 |    76.63 |   97.01 |   82.67 | ...1319,1351-1353 
  ...-installer.ts |    64.3 |    82.35 |   80.76 |    64.3 | ...45-446,460-472 
  ...oordinator.ts |   76.69 |    67.47 |   85.71 |   76.69 | ...1884,1975-1976 
  ...controller.ts |   67.82 |    79.66 |      75 |   67.82 | ...66-278,287-295 
  ...sk-service.ts |   87.29 |    62.24 |   95.55 |   87.29 | ...1174,1176-1177 
  ...redentials.ts |   96.26 |    93.47 |     100 |   96.26 | 91-94             
  ...me-session.ts |   65.63 |    57.24 |   88.88 |   65.63 | ...2270,2275-2282 
  ...up-context.ts |   94.85 |    77.39 |     100 |   94.85 | ...18,327-330,350 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 .../local-control |   82.89 |    88.88 |      90 |   82.89 |                   
  credentials.ts   |   96.42 |    95.45 |     100 |   96.42 | 109-110           
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...interfaces.ts |   43.58 |    83.33 |   42.85 |   43.58 | ...09-117,130-142 
  ...r-identity.ts |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 61                
  service.ts       |    93.4 |       90 |     100 |    93.4 | ...20-222,313-315 
 src/serve/routes  |   85.84 |    80.93 |   95.25 |   85.84 |                   
  a2ui-action.ts   |   96.84 |     88.5 |    87.5 |   96.84 | ...70-272,309-311 
  capabilities.ts  |   98.73 |    96.15 |     100 |   98.73 | 82                
  ...nel-notify.ts |   79.16 |    85.18 |     100 |   79.16 | ...03-104,120-126 
  ...l-webhooks.ts |   93.56 |    84.09 |     100 |   93.56 | ...42,292,332,334 
  daemon-status.ts |   85.71 |    83.33 |     100 |   85.71 | 101-108           
  goals.ts         |   98.94 |    91.17 |     100 |   98.94 | 143               
  health.ts        |   99.09 |    91.17 |     100 |   99.09 | 147               
  live-setup.ts    |   33.33 |     37.5 |      50 |   33.33 | ...18-123,130-135 
  live.ts          |   84.61 |    76.47 |     100 |   84.61 | ...04,106-111,131 
  permission.ts    |     100 |     92.3 |     100 |     100 | 50,98             
  ...uled-tasks.ts |   87.53 |    84.26 |   93.33 |   87.53 | ...1389,1432-1433 
  ...on-runtime.ts |   91.42 |       90 |     100 |   91.42 | 56-64             
  session.ts       |   86.25 |    82.36 |   93.45 |   86.25 | ...6730,6732-6733 
  sse-events.ts    |   86.85 |    85.64 |   94.11 |   86.85 | ...18-929,932,939 
  usage-stats.ts   |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 118               
  ...space-auth.ts |   85.55 |    75.64 |     100 |   85.55 | ...21-326,331,345 
  ...el-control.ts |   86.26 |    78.94 |     100 |   86.26 | ...17-318,339-347 
  ...management.ts |   90.35 |    78.94 |     100 |   90.35 | ...52-553,576-577 
  ...d-contacts.ts |   83.62 |    94.59 |     100 |   83.62 | 123,125-142       
  ...controller.ts |   83.33 |    80.47 |      90 |   83.33 | ...1056,1061,1068 
  ...extensions.ts |    88.8 |    77.83 |   93.84 |    88.8 | ...2329,2374-2375 
  ...-file-read.ts |      91 |    80.91 |     100 |      91 | ...20-621,624-625 
  ...file-write.ts |   89.72 |    79.35 |     100 |   89.72 | ...05,719-726,807 
  ...t-branches.ts |   75.43 |    66.66 |     100 |   75.43 | ...13-618,627-634 
  ...e-git-diff.ts |   97.32 |    90.56 |     100 |   97.32 | 161-162,189-191   
  ...ce-git-log.ts |     100 |    93.18 |     100 |     100 | 52,77,188         
  workspace-git.ts |   77.08 |    89.65 |     100 |   77.08 | 97-118            
  ...github-prs.ts |   88.26 |    63.46 |     100 |   88.26 | ...38-239,264-265 
  ...-lifecycle.ts |   95.23 |    75.75 |     100 |   95.23 | ...50-151,186-187 
  ...al-control.ts |   74.17 |    69.23 |     100 |   74.17 | ...18,220-226,231 
  ...management.ts |   87.47 |       85 |     100 |   87.47 | ...1733,1743-1748 
  ...cp-control.ts |    73.2 |    67.54 |   85.71 |    73.2 | ...27-633,644-645 
  ...ace-models.ts |   95.53 |    89.74 |     100 |   95.53 | ...52-157,296-297 
  ...ermissions.ts |    77.9 |    72.41 |     100 |    77.9 | ...69-277,298-316 
  ...e-settings.ts |   75.67 |       75 |     100 |   75.67 | ...15-726,732-733 
  ...tup-github.ts |   77.97 |    70.58 |   84.21 |   77.97 | ...46-352,397-398 
  ...ace-skills.ts |    76.9 |    87.15 |     100 |    76.9 | ...29-354,360-394 
  ...ace-status.ts |   82.94 |     74.5 |     100 |   82.94 | ...84-486,490-491 
  ...pace-tools.ts |   75.94 |    69.69 |   66.66 |   75.94 | ...59-164,193-194 
  ...pace-trust.ts |   76.92 |     67.1 |      80 |   76.92 | ...38-343,351-352 
  ...pace-voice.ts |   91.33 |    81.02 |     100 |   91.33 | ...70-673,676-678 
 src/serve/server  |   92.75 |    89.98 |   97.22 |   92.75 |                   
  access-log.ts    |   98.73 |    97.26 |     100 |   98.73 | 119,196           
  ...-timestamp.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...er-helpers.ts |   63.82 |    78.15 |   81.81 |   63.82 | ...16,330,332-347 
  ...w-registry.ts |    98.8 |    81.81 |     100 |    98.8 | 107               
  ...r-handlers.ts |   97.87 |       80 |     100 |   97.87 | 27                
  ...r-response.ts |   87.73 |    76.19 |     100 |   87.73 | ...97,814,877-886 
  fs-factory.ts    |     100 |    95.52 |     100 |     100 | 77,144,200        
  ...branch-ops.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...list-cache.ts |   99.01 |    95.52 |     100 |   99.01 | 184-185           
  ...t-deadline.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...iter-setup.ts |      65 |       80 |   33.33 |      65 | 30-35,38-43,47-48 
  ...st-helpers.ts |   95.13 |    95.09 |     100 |   95.13 | ...66-168,423-428 
  self-origin.ts   |   76.19 |       80 |     100 |   76.19 | 45-54             
  ...e-features.ts |      95 |     87.5 |     100 |      95 | 182-188           
  ...on-archive.ts |   91.39 |    87.04 |   97.56 |   91.39 | ...,975,1003-1004 
  ...ion-export.ts |     100 |       95 |     100 |     100 | 64                
  session-list.ts  |      97 |    93.45 |     100 |      97 | ...1068,1273-1277 
  ...ry-context.ts |    87.5 |       50 |     100 |    87.5 | 49-50             
  telemetry.ts     |   99.06 |    97.26 |     100 |   99.06 | ...04,873,952-954 
 src/serve/voice   |    92.7 |    91.53 |   97.72 |    92.7 |                   
  ...ice-config.ts |   84.81 |       30 |     100 |   84.81 | 91-100,104-105    
  voice-ws.ts      |   91.58 |    93.44 |      96 |   91.58 | ...68,483,521-523 
  ...oordinator.ts |     100 |    98.24 |     100 |     100 | 176               
 ...kspace-service |    90.9 |    88.03 |   91.66 |    90.9 |                   
  index.ts         |   90.41 |    87.29 |      90 |   90.41 | ...1505-1509,1512 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/services      |   92.69 |    89.67 |   98.13 |   92.69 |                   
  ...mandLoader.ts |     100 |       95 |     100 |     100 | 106               
  ...killLoader.ts |   97.19 |    85.71 |     100 |   97.19 | 142,153-154       
  ...andService.ts |   98.73 |      100 |     100 |   98.73 | 107               
  ...mandLoader.ts |   87.09 |    83.07 |     100 |   87.09 | ...35-340,345-350 
  ...omptLoader.ts |   79.55 |    88.42 |   85.71 |   79.55 | ...48,178,245-246 
  ...mandLoader.ts |   97.77 |     92.3 |     100 |   97.77 | 176,183-184       
  ...nd-factory.ts |   91.42 |    91.66 |     100 |   91.42 | 128,137-144       
  ...ation-tool.ts |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 125               
  ...ndMetadata.ts |   98.23 |    96.72 |     100 |   98.23 | 83,87             
  commandUtils.ts  |      96 |     90.9 |     100 |      96 | 48                
  ...and-parser.ts |   90.69 |    85.71 |     100 |   90.69 | 63-66             
  ...ionService.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  prompt-stash.ts  |   96.66 |    92.85 |     100 |   96.66 | 34-35             
  ...tree-lease.ts |   92.14 |    92.42 |     100 |   92.14 | ...91-296,329-330 
  ...low-loader.ts |     100 |    96.29 |     100 |     100 | 88                
  setup-github.ts  |    90.8 |    80.95 |     100 |    90.8 | ...49-450,457-458 
  ...-args-file.ts |   93.93 |    91.66 |    87.5 |   93.93 | 208-210,224-230   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-keyterms.ts |   98.64 |    95.77 |     100 |   98.64 | 116,142-143       
  voice-model.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  voice-service.ts |    90.4 |    87.87 |     100 |    90.4 | ...81,288,353-358 
  ...e-settings.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 19                
  ...ranscriber.ts |   91.77 |    87.11 |   97.22 |   91.77 | ...99-901,904-906 
 ...rvices/insight |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  dates.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ght/generators |   88.94 |    86.86 |   96.29 |   88.94 |                   
  DataProcessor.ts |   88.31 |    86.84 |      95 |   88.31 | ...1368,1372-1379 
  ...tGenerator.ts |   98.24 |    85.71 |     100 |   98.24 | 47                
  ...teRenderer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 .../insight/types |       0 |       50 |      50 |       0 |                   
  ...sightTypes.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...sightTypes.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...mpt-processors |   97.27 |    94.25 |     100 |   97.27 |                   
  ...tProcessor.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...eProcessor.ts |   94.52 |       85 |     100 |   94.52 | 46-47,93-94       
  ...tionParser.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lProcessor.ts |   97.41 |    95.83 |     100 |   97.41 | 96-99             
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/services/tips |   97.27 |    84.61 |     100 |   97.27 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tipHistory.ts    |   92.59 |       70 |     100 |   92.59 | ...24,146,153,162 
  tipRegistry.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tipScheduler.ts  |     100 |    91.66 |     100 |     100 | 55                
 src/startup       |   88.99 |    83.47 |    90.9 |   88.99 |                   
  ...p-prefetch.ts |   98.09 |    94.23 |    87.5 |   98.09 | 50,209,225-226    
  ...reeStartup.ts |   80.53 |     74.6 |     100 |   80.53 | ...94,403,409-412 
 src/test-utils    |   94.09 |    79.16 |   77.77 |   94.09 |                   
  ci-env.ts        |      88 |     62.5 |     100 |      88 | 22-23,28          
  ...omMatchers.ts |   69.69 |       50 |      50 |   69.69 | 32-35,37-39,45-47 
  ...mised-lock.ts |     100 |      100 |   66.66 |     100 |                   
  ...andContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  render.tsx       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui            |   74.57 |    75.47 |   68.47 |   74.57 |                   
  App.tsx          |   33.33 |       75 |   33.33 |   33.33 | 32-86             
  AppContainer.tsx |   76.06 |       72 |   69.44 |   76.06 | ...4292,4408-4414 
  ...tionNudge.tsx |    9.58 |      100 |       0 |    9.58 | 24-94             
  ...ackDialog.tsx |    30.3 |      100 |       0 |    30.3 | 26-76             
  ...tionNudge.tsx |    7.69 |      100 |       0 |    7.69 | 25-103            
  colors.ts        |   63.63 |      100 |   41.17 |   63.63 | ...52,54-55,60-61 
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  keyMatchers.ts   |   95.91 |    97.14 |     100 |   95.91 | 25-26             
  ...tic-colors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ractiveUI.tsx |   71.42 |     74.5 |    62.5 |   71.42 | ...10,337,404-409 
  ...inePresets.ts |   96.27 |    83.87 |     100 |   96.27 | ...97,402,410-412 
  textConstants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/auth       |   58.76 |    66.66 |   51.06 |   58.76 |                   
  AuthDialog.tsx   |   59.01 |     42.1 |   16.66 |   59.01 | ...25,332-354,358 
  ...nProgress.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-64              
  ...etupSteps.tsx |   60.21 |    70.73 |   57.69 |   60.21 | ...90,794,803,806 
  useAuth.ts       |   94.83 |       75 |     100 |   94.83 | ...33-234,253-259 
  ...rSetupFlow.ts |   43.18 |    33.33 |      50 |   43.18 | ...78-399,416-459 
 src/ui/commands   |   84.24 |    83.84 |   90.71 |   84.24 |                   
  aboutCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...or-command.ts |     100 |    95.65 |     100 |     100 | 104,182           
  agentsCommand.ts |   83.78 |      100 |      60 |   83.78 | 30-32,42-44       
  ...odeCommand.ts |    93.1 |    95.23 |     100 |    93.1 | 77-82             
  arenaCommand.ts  |   63.89 |    65.71 |   65.21 |   63.89 | ...01-606,691-699 
  authCommand.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  branchCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  btwCommand.ts    |   94.32 |    77.41 |     100 |   94.32 | 35-36,114-119     
  bugCommand.ts    |     100 |    77.77 |     100 |     100 | 28,62             
  cdCommand.ts     |    92.3 |    82.75 |     100 |    92.3 | ...,94-99,178,187 
  clearCommand.ts  |    80.9 |    70.83 |     100 |    80.9 | ...28-129,137-146 
  ...essCommand.ts |   68.22 |    54.05 |      75 |   68.22 | ...97-198,212-215 
  ...astCommand.ts |   84.27 |       75 |     100 |   84.27 | ...,91-97,125-130 
  ...ig-command.ts |   93.12 |    88.42 |     100 |   93.12 | ...07-315,321-323 
  ...extCommand.ts |   75.05 |    74.39 |   84.61 |   75.05 | ...95-628,639-640 
  copyCommand.ts   |    98.7 |    96.29 |     100 |    98.7 | 66-67,172,272,323 
  ...or-command.ts |   85.95 |    80.55 |   88.88 |   85.95 | ...68-274,298-309 
  deleteCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  diffCommand.ts   |     100 |    87.87 |     100 |     100 | ...63,231-232,245 
  ...ryCommand.tsx |   90.56 |    87.83 |    90.9 |   90.56 | ...75-280,327-334 
  docsCommand.ts   |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 26                
  doctorCommand.ts |   70.16 |    84.61 |      95 |   70.16 | ...29-679,682-816 
  dreamCommand.ts  |   85.45 |    88.88 |     100 |   85.45 | 58-65             
  editorCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rt-command.ts |   80.48 |       75 |     100 |   80.48 | 49-54,69-72,93-98 
  effort-utils.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  exportCommand.ts |   98.25 |    91.02 |     100 |   98.25 | ...81,198-199,364 
  ...onsCommand.ts |   52.31 |    56.25 |   69.23 |   52.31 | ...09,277-329,390 
  forgetCommand.ts |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 59                
  forkCommand.ts   |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 96,147            
  goalCommand.ts   |     100 |    96.49 |     100 |     100 | 139,192           
  helpCommand.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...oryCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  hooksCommand.ts  |   81.25 |    65.71 |   85.71 |   81.25 | ...,86-93,131-132 
  ideCommand.ts    |   60.75 |    64.28 |   41.17 |   60.75 | ...05-306,310-324 
  ...figCommand.ts |   52.83 |    81.25 |      70 |   52.83 | ...74-319,321-330 
  initCommand.ts   |   91.86 |       80 |     100 |   91.86 | 48,83-88          
  ...ghtCommand.ts |   77.87 |    71.42 |     100 |   77.87 | ...44-245,250-272 
  ...ageCommand.ts |   94.44 |    90.14 |     100 |   94.44 | ...13-214,241-251 
  learn-command.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  lspCommand.ts    |     100 |    86.95 |     100 |     100 | 31,102-103        
  mcpCommand.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  memoryCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  modelCommand.ts  |   85.08 |    82.74 |     100 |   85.08 | ...1090,1124-1129 
  ...onsCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  planCommand.ts   |   78.82 |    76.92 |     100 |   78.82 | 30-35,51-56,68-73 
  quitCommand.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  recapCommand.ts  |   21.81 |      100 |      50 |   21.81 | 24-73             
  ...ns-command.ts |   98.83 |    81.81 |     100 |   98.83 | 100               
  ...berCommand.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 46                
  renameCommand.ts |    89.6 |       90 |     100 |    89.6 | ...72-176,212-219 
  ...oreCommand.ts |   90.96 |    86.04 |     100 |   90.96 | ...41-146,177-178 
  resumeCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  rewindCommand.ts |   81.25 |      100 |      50 |   81.25 | 20-22             
  ...ngsCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...hubCommand.ts |   89.47 |       75 |      80 |   89.47 | 54-59             
  skillsCommand.ts |   78.82 |    81.81 |     100 |   78.82 | 37-52,78,97       
  statsCommand.ts  |   90.65 |    76.73 |     100 |   90.65 | ...30-733,825-832 
  ...ineCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...aryCommand.ts |   73.04 |     82.3 |      90 |   73.04 | ...20-547,561-565 
  tasksCommand.ts  |   77.33 |    72.13 |     100 |   77.33 | ...46-150,173-178 
  ...tupCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  themeCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  toolsCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  trustCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...te-command.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 74,148            
  vimCommand.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  voice-command.ts |   93.63 |       88 |     100 |   93.63 | 36,98-103         
  ...owsCommand.ts |   94.38 |    85.29 |     100 |   94.38 | ...78-183,282-287 
 src/ui/components |   72.84 |    79.91 |   77.58 |   72.84 |                   
  AboutBox.tsx     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  AnsiOutput.tsx   |   65.57 |      100 |      50 |   65.57 | 69-90             
  ApiKeyInput.tsx  |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-97              
  AppHeader.tsx    |    88.7 |       75 |     100 |    88.7 | 36,38-43,45       
  ...odeDialog.tsx |   87.24 |    72.22 |   33.33 |   87.24 | ...85,233-238,245 
  AsciiArt.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Indicator.tsx |   95.65 |    66.66 |     100 |   95.65 | 27,52             
  ...TextInput.tsx |   88.65 |    90.41 |     100 |   88.65 | ...84-286,300-302 
  Composer.tsx     |   94.49 |    66.66 |     100 |   94.49 | ...-76,88,143,157 
  ...entPrompt.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ryDisplay.tsx |   75.89 |    62.06 |     100 |   75.89 | ...,88,93-108,113 
  ...geDisplay.tsx |   68.42 |    57.14 |     100 |   68.42 | 16-17,31-32,42-50 
  CronPill.tsx     |     100 |    93.75 |     100 |     100 | 19                
  ...ification.tsx |      84 |       60 |     100 |      84 | 23-24,40-42       
  ...gProfiler.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-36              
  ...ogManager.tsx |   11.28 |      100 |       0 |   11.28 | 71-598            
  DiffDialog.tsx   |    53.5 |     37.5 |   69.23 |    53.5 | ...32-737,747-760 
  ...ngsDialog.tsx |    8.44 |      100 |       0 |    8.44 | 37-195            
  EffortDialog.tsx |   97.36 |      100 |     100 |   97.36 | 55-56             
  ExitWarning.tsx  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...hProgress.tsx |    87.8 |    33.33 |     100 |    87.8 | 28-31,56          
  ...ustDialog.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  Footer.tsx       |   81.27 |    69.23 |      50 |   81.27 | ...06,245,267-272 
  ...ngSpinner.tsx |   68.42 |    85.71 |      50 |   68.42 | 35-52,73,80-81    
  GoalPill.tsx     |   93.51 |    81.81 |     100 |   93.51 | 37-38,106-109,123 
  Header.tsx       |   98.65 |    94.73 |     100 |   98.65 | 173,175           
  Help.tsx         |   98.33 |       90 |     100 |   98.33 | ...25,382,448-449 
  ...emDisplay.tsx |   79.69 |    67.61 |     100 |   79.69 | ...17,520,523-529 
  ...ngeDialog.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  InputPrompt.tsx  |   84.26 |    82.94 |      80 |   84.26 | ...2215,2236,2332 
  ...Shortcuts.tsx |     100 |       88 |     100 |     100 | 98,119            
  ...Indicator.tsx |   98.18 |    97.82 |     100 |   98.18 | 161-162           
  ...firmation.tsx |   91.42 |      100 |      50 |   91.42 | 26-31             
  MainContent.tsx  |   95.88 |    96.03 |   46.15 |   95.88 | ...20,523-527,530 
  MemoryDialog.tsx |   86.59 |    80.15 |     100 |   86.59 | ...34-435,485,553 
  ...geDisplay.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-41              
  ModelDialog.tsx  |   85.22 |    74.08 |     100 |   85.22 | ...1041,1097,1099 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |     100 |    97.22 |     100 |     100 | 270               
  ...fications.tsx |   16.66 |      100 |       0 |   16.66 | 14-56             
  ...onsDialog.tsx |    2.13 |      100 |       0 |    2.13 | 62-133,148-1004   
  ...ryDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...icePrompt.tsx |   92.64 |    85.71 |     100 |   92.64 | 102-106,134-139   
  PrepareLabel.tsx |   91.66 |    77.27 |     100 |   91.66 | 73-75,77-79,110   
  ...atePrompt.tsx |    8.57 |      100 |       0 |    8.57 | 24-55,58-134      
  ...geDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngDisplay.tsx |   21.42 |      100 |       0 |   21.42 | 13-39             
  ...hProgress.tsx |   85.25 |    88.46 |     100 |   85.25 | 121-147           
  ...dSelector.tsx |   92.79 |    82.65 |     100 |   92.79 | ...19-323,354-370 
  ...ionPicker.tsx |   83.66 |    72.13 |     100 |   83.66 | ...96,402,444-466 
  ...onPreview.tsx |   93.58 |    83.78 |     100 |   93.58 | ...,70-71,195-197 
  ...ryDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...putPrompt.tsx |   92.06 |    86.36 |   83.33 |   92.06 | ...,70-72,120-123 
  ...tedDialog.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngsDialog.tsx |   71.55 |    73.89 |   69.23 |   71.55 | ...1252,1258-1259 
  ...ionDialog.tsx |    92.3 |    96.15 |   33.33 |    92.3 | 60-63,68-75,164   
  ...putPrompt.tsx |    15.9 |      100 |       0 |    15.9 | 20-63             
  ...Indicator.tsx |   57.14 |      100 |       0 |   57.14 | 12-15             
  ...MoreLines.tsx |      28 |      100 |       0 |      28 | 18-40             
  ...iewDialog.tsx |   97.77 |    87.67 |     100 |   97.77 | ...97,305-307,324 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |   95.86 |       75 |     100 |   95.86 | 67-71             
  ...ionPicker.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-172             
  ...tivityTab.tsx |    3.94 |      100 |       0 |    3.94 | 27-275            
  StatsDialog.tsx  |    8.64 |      100 |       0 |    8.64 | ...76-111,130-322 
  StatsDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ciencyTab.tsx |    78.9 |    56.52 |     100 |    78.9 | ...26,213,262-288 
  ...atmapView.tsx |    8.98 |      100 |       0 |    8.98 | 20-107            
  ...essionTab.tsx |      80 |    66.66 |     100 |      80 | ...70-277,283-300 
  ...ineDialog.tsx |    93.9 |    86.88 |     100 |    93.9 | ...20,282,302-304 
  ...yTodoList.tsx |   96.36 |    88.23 |     100 |   96.36 | 138-141           
  ...nsDisplay.tsx |   95.62 |    87.09 |     100 |   95.62 | ...24-125,273-275 
  ...inalImage.tsx |     100 |    93.93 |     100 |     100 | 75,129            
  ThemeDialog.tsx  |   89.95 |    46.15 |      75 |   89.95 | ...71-173,243-245 
  Tips.tsx         |   93.54 |       75 |     100 |   93.54 | 39-40             
  TodoDisplay.tsx  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 31-32             
  TrustDialog.tsx  |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 72-87             
  ...ification.tsx |   36.36 |      100 |       0 |   36.36 | 15-22             
  ...Indicator.tsx |    92.5 |     87.5 |     100 |    92.5 | 50-53             
  ...ackDialog.tsx |    7.84 |      100 |       0 |    7.84 | 24-134            
  ...xitDialog.tsx |   80.36 |    43.47 |      60 |   80.36 | ...24-238,248-251 
  ...odeVisuals.ts |   97.22 |    85.71 |     100 |   97.22 | 25                
  ...s-helpers.tsx |   66.25 |    81.25 |      50 |   66.25 | 25-32,46-53,62-72 
 ...nts/agent-view |   58.69 |    70.24 |    62.5 |   58.69 |                   
  ...atContent.tsx |    9.09 |      100 |       0 |    9.09 | 54-275,281-283    
  ...tChatView.tsx |     100 |    81.81 |     100 |     100 | 82                
  ...tComposer.tsx |   69.48 |    33.33 |   66.66 |   69.48 | ...51,269,277-279 
  AgentFooter.tsx  |   15.38 |      100 |       0 |   15.38 | 28-65             
  AgentHeader.tsx  |   15.38 |      100 |       0 |   15.38 | 27-64             
  AgentTabBar.tsx  |    87.9 |    63.88 |     100 |    87.9 | ...88,110-118,136 
  ...oryAdapter.ts |     100 |    91.83 |     100 |     100 | 103,109-110,138   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-12              
 ...mponents/arena |   45.51 |    70.53 |   60.86 |   45.51 |                   
  ArenaCards.tsx   |   73.06 |    71.79 |   85.71 |   73.06 | ...83-185,321-326 
  ...ectDialog.tsx |   83.48 |    69.86 |   88.88 |   83.48 | ...88-392,409-410 
  ...artDialog.tsx |    9.77 |      100 |       0 |    9.77 | 27-166            
  ...tusDialog.tsx |    5.63 |      100 |       0 |    5.63 | 33-75,80-288      
  ...topDialog.tsx |    6.17 |      100 |       0 |    6.17 | 33-213            
 ...ackground-view |   85.34 |    84.91 |   92.98 |   85.34 |                   
  ...sksDialog.tsx |   81.87 |    82.77 |   85.71 |   81.87 | ...1853,1965-1971 
  ...TasksPill.tsx |   78.84 |    94.28 |     100 |   78.84 | 64,109-129        
  ...gentPanel.tsx |   97.08 |    86.31 |     100 |   97.08 | 132,442-446,520   
  agent-forest.ts  |    99.2 |    93.93 |     100 |    99.2 | 258               
  ...Visibility.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-overlay.tsx |    88.2 |    76.47 |     100 |    88.2 | ...36-138,140-142 
 ...nts/extensions |   84.32 |    76.78 |   83.33 |   84.32 |                   
  ...gerDialog.tsx |   82.15 |    76.08 |     100 |   82.15 | ...91-198,258,260 
  TabBar.tsx       |   97.29 |    88.88 |     100 |   97.29 | 33                
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-12              
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...tensions/steps |   46.26 |       85 |   58.82 |   46.26 |                   
  ...ctionStep.tsx |   95.12 |    92.85 |   85.71 |   95.12 | 84-86,89          
  ...etailStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-145             
  ...nListStep.tsx |   75.26 |    88.37 |   66.66 |   75.26 | ...53,174,203-209 
  ...electStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-83              
  ...nfirmStep.tsx |   16.32 |      100 |       0 |   16.32 | 28-74             
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-11              
 ...xtensions/tabs |   71.92 |    68.21 |   70.83 |   71.92 |                   
  DiscoverTab.tsx  |   68.22 |    67.66 |   55.55 |   68.22 | ...93,656-660,664 
  InstalledTab.tsx |   75.49 |    67.44 |   83.33 |   75.49 | ...77,782-783,820 
  SourcesTab.tsx   |   71.67 |    70.47 |   77.77 |   71.67 | ...28,547,621-633 
 ...tensions/views |    50.7 |    52.38 |   20.83 |    50.7 |                   
  ...tionsView.tsx |   73.75 |    56.36 |   66.66 |   73.75 | ...30,353,369-374 
  ...tionsView.tsx |   43.45 |    44.82 |    6.66 |   43.45 | ...98-405,408-420 
  ...etailView.tsx |    9.24 |      100 |       0 |    9.24 | 40-67,70-163      
 ...mponents/hooks |   87.11 |    81.37 |   91.89 |   87.11 |                   
  ...rListBody.tsx |   95.29 |    85.18 |     100 |   95.29 | 95-98             
  ...etailStep.tsx |   75.32 |    71.42 |      60 |   75.32 | ...56-169,173-186 
  ...etailStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rListStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entHeader.tsx |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 47                
  ...rListStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...etailStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...abledStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sListStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entDialog.tsx |   72.29 |    70.49 |     100 |   72.29 | ...51,563-568,572 
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-13              
  ...erGrouping.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sourceLabels.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...components/mcp |   40.91 |    63.44 |   70.58 |   40.91 |                   
  ...ealthPill.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entDialog.tsx |   32.09 |    26.19 |      40 |   32.09 | ...12,914,927-933 
  ...valDialog.tsx |   15.06 |      100 |       0 |   15.06 | 40-109            
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-35              
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  utils.ts         |      97 |       95 |     100 |      97 | 24,113-114        
 ...ents/mcp/steps |   53.94 |    73.51 |   57.14 |   53.94 |                   
  ...icateStep.tsx |    5.65 |      100 |       0 |    5.65 | 40-66,69-308      
  ...electStep.tsx |   10.95 |      100 |       0 |   10.95 | 16-88             
  ...etailStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...eListStep.tsx |   99.09 |    97.36 |     100 |   99.09 | 71                
  ...etailStep.tsx |   62.83 |       60 |   33.33 |   62.83 | ...87-296,307-332 
  ...rListStep.tsx |   88.53 |    81.25 |     100 |   88.53 | ...64,170,175-180 
  ...etailStep.tsx |    10.3 |      100 |       0 |    10.3 | ...1,67-79,82-140 
  ToolListStep.tsx |   69.29 |       50 |     100 |   69.29 | ...23,126,135-144 
 ...nents/messages |   90.35 |    86.92 |   85.71 |   90.35 |                   
  ...orMessage.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ionDialog.tsx |   89.23 |     84.9 |   81.81 |   89.23 | ...75,593,611-613 
  BtwMessage.tsx   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...upDisplay.tsx |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | ...43,289,402,432 
  ...onMessage.tsx |   92.06 |    82.35 |     100 |   92.06 | 58-60,62,64       
  ...nMessages.tsx |   94.11 |    95.91 |   76.92 |   94.11 | ...47-349,352-355 
  DiffRenderer.tsx |   93.17 |    86.02 |     100 |   93.17 | ...07,235-236,302 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |   97.08 |    77.77 |     100 |   97.08 | 95,97,106         
  ...usMessage.tsx |   81.73 |     65.9 |      75 |   81.73 | ...10-214,222,245 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |   95.52 |    88.31 |     100 |   95.52 | ...40,142,175-180 
  ...ssMessage.tsx |    12.5 |      100 |       0 |    12.5 | 18-59             
  ...edMessage.tsx |   21.05 |      100 |       0 |   21.05 | 23-39             
  ...sMessages.tsx |   59.04 |       50 |    37.5 |   59.04 | ...21-126,147-159 
  ...ryMessage.tsx |   13.63 |      100 |       0 |   13.63 | 23-64             
  ...onMessage.tsx |   91.87 |    82.63 |     100 |   91.87 | ...49-651,658-660 
  ...upMessage.tsx |   98.38 |    95.38 |     100 |   98.38 | 188-191,422       
  ToolMessage.tsx  |   93.06 |    86.32 |   93.75 |   93.06 | ...1037,1082-1084 
 ...ponents/shared |   86.29 |     82.4 |   94.17 |   86.29 |                   
  ...ctionList.tsx |     100 |      100 |      75 |     100 |                   
  ...tonSelect.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  EnumSelector.tsx |     100 |    96.42 |     100 |     100 | 58                
  ...rBoundary.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  MaxSizedBox.tsx  |   84.71 |    86.95 |      90 |   84.71 | ...67-568,685-686 
  MultiSelect.tsx  |   93.58 |       75 |     100 |   93.58 | ...43,199-201,211 
  ...tonSelect.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ontroller.tsx |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 73,93-95          
  ...eSelector.tsx |     100 |       60 |     100 |     100 | 40-45             
  ...lableList.tsx |   81.48 |    84.84 |     100 |   81.48 | 46-66,73-76       
  StaticRender.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  TextInput.tsx    |    80.8 |    67.24 |      80 |    80.8 | ...36-240,252-258 
  ...ontroller.tsx |     100 |    81.81 |     100 |     100 | 59-62             
  ...apsedTime.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Indicator.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lizedList.tsx |   91.49 |    86.66 |   83.33 |   91.49 | ...18-846,859,959 
  text-buffer.ts   |   85.98 |    81.81 |   97.91 |   85.98 | ...2664,2762-2763 
  ...er-actions.ts |   73.93 |    67.22 |     100 |   73.93 | ...32-733,934-936 
 ...ponents/skills |    3.96 |      100 |       0 |    3.96 |                   
  ...gerDialog.tsx |    3.96 |      100 |       0 |    3.96 | 79-137,140-681    
 ...ents/subagents |   30.87 |        0 |       0 |   30.87 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-11              
  reducers.tsx     |    12.1 |      100 |       0 |    12.1 | 33-190            
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  utils.ts         |   10.95 |      100 |       0 |   10.95 | ...1,56-57,60-102 
 ...bagents/create |    9.13 |      100 |       0 |    9.13 |                   
  ...ionWizard.tsx |    7.28 |      100 |       0 |    7.28 | 34-299            
  ...rSelector.tsx |   14.75 |      100 |       0 |   14.75 | 26-85             
  ...onSummary.tsx |    4.26 |      100 |       0 |    4.26 | 27-331            
  ...tionInput.tsx |    8.63 |      100 |       0 |    8.63 | 23-177            
  ...dSelector.tsx |   33.33 |      100 |       0 |   33.33 | 20-21,26-27,36-63 
  ...nSelector.tsx |    37.5 |      100 |       0 |    37.5 | 20-21,26-27,36-58 
  ...EntryStep.tsx |   12.76 |      100 |       0 |   12.76 | 34-78             
  ToolSelector.tsx |    4.16 |      100 |       0 |    4.16 | 31-253            
 ...bagents/manage |    21.6 |    59.52 |   27.27 |    21.6 |                   
  ...ctionStep.tsx |   10.25 |      100 |       0 |   10.25 | 21-103            
  ...eleteStep.tsx |   20.93 |      100 |       0 |   20.93 | 23-62             
  ...tEditStep.tsx |   25.53 |      100 |       0 |   25.53 | ...2,37-38,51-124 
  ...ctionStep.tsx |   35.61 |    59.52 |     100 |   35.61 | ...21-433,438-440 
  ...iewerStep.tsx |   13.72 |      100 |       0 |   13.72 | 18-73             
  ...gerDialog.tsx |    6.74 |      100 |       0 |    6.74 | 35-341            
 ...mponents/views |    70.1 |    72.89 |   61.11 |    70.1 |                   
  ContextUsage.tsx |   71.49 |    64.86 |      80 |   71.49 | ...30-436,473-567 
  DoctorReport.tsx |     9.8 |      100 |       0 |     9.8 | 25-54,57-131      
  ...sionsList.tsx |   88.05 |       75 |     100 |   88.05 | 70-77             
  McpStatus.tsx    |   92.01 |     73.8 |     100 |   92.01 | ...36,175-177,262 
  SkillsList.tsx   |   20.51 |      100 |       0 |   20.51 | 17-20,27-57       
  ToolsList.tsx    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/contexts   |   86.01 |    81.54 |   86.48 |   86.01 |                   
  ...ewContext.tsx |   87.56 |       80 |      75 |   87.56 | ...37-240,246-256 
  AppContext.tsx   |      80 |       50 |     100 |      80 | 19-20             
  ...ewContext.tsx |   93.83 |    68.51 |   42.85 |   93.83 | ...44,281-285,317 
  ...igContext.tsx |   81.81 |       50 |     100 |   81.81 | 15-16             
  ...ssContext.tsx |   85.65 |    84.85 |     100 |   85.65 | ...1612-1614,1620 
  ...owContext.tsx |   91.07 |    81.81 |     100 |   91.07 | 47-48,60-62       
  ...deContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |      50 |     100 |                   
  ...onContext.tsx |   80.77 |    79.56 |    92.3 |   80.77 | ...31-434,443-446 
  ...gsContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...usContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngContext.tsx |   71.42 |       50 |     100 |   71.42 | 17-20             
  ...utContext.tsx |   85.71 |      100 |   66.66 |   85.71 | 13-14             
  ...edContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |      50 |     100 |                   
  ...nsContext.tsx |   88.88 |       50 |     100 |   88.88 | 156-157           
  ...teContext.tsx |   86.66 |       50 |     100 |   86.66 | 235-236           
  ...deContext.tsx |      80 |     87.5 |      75 |      80 | ...11-112,118-120 
  ...rtContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/daemon     |   88.35 |    73.51 |   95.45 |   88.35 |                   
  ...ui-adapter.ts |   88.35 |    73.51 |   95.45 |   88.35 | ...74,792-793,879 
 src/ui/editors    |   93.33 |    85.71 |   66.66 |   93.33 |                   
  ...ngsManager.ts |   93.33 |    85.71 |   66.66 |   93.33 | 49,63-64          
 src/ui/hooks      |   85.97 |    83.91 |   87.81 |   85.97 |                   
  ...dProcessor.ts |   85.53 |    85.13 |     100 |   85.53 | ...-970,1017-1018 
  ...ention-ref.ts |   97.72 |       84 |     100 |   97.72 | 65                
  keyToAnsi.ts     |    3.92 |      100 |       0 |    3.92 | 19-77             
  ...esourceRef.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...completion.ts |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 95                
  ...ention-ref.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...dProcessor.ts |   94.62 |    73.58 |     100 |   94.62 | ...87-288,293-294 
  ...dProcessor.ts |   86.79 |    71.86 |   83.33 |   86.79 | ...1529,1558-1562 
  ...rt-command.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sced-flush.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ng-enabled.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...oice-input.ts |   92.36 |    81.95 |   66.66 |   92.36 | ...00,502-503,658 
  ...ke-repaint.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...amingState.ts |   12.22 |      100 |       0 |   12.22 | 54-157            
  ...agerDialog.ts |   88.23 |      100 |     100 |   88.23 | 20,24             
  ...dScrollbar.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ationFrame.ts |      42 |       75 |     100 |      42 | 42-44,53-59,62-87 
  ...odeCommand.ts |   58.82 |      100 |     100 |   58.82 | 28,33-48          
  ...enaCommand.ts |      85 |      100 |     100 |      85 | 23-24,29          
  ...aInProcess.ts |   27.92 |       80 |      25 |   27.92 | ...69-170,173-175 
  ...Completion.ts |   86.44 |    88.48 |     100 |   86.44 | ...14-515,525-541 
  ...ifications.ts |   87.82 |    96.77 |     100 |   87.82 | 138-152           
  ...tIndicator.ts |   88.28 |    81.57 |     100 |   88.28 | ...66,175,179-187 
  ...waySummary.ts |   96.26 |       75 |     100 |   96.26 | 126-128,170       
  ...ndTaskView.ts |   94.89 |    77.55 |     100 |   94.89 | 164-168,257,263   
  ...chedScroll.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ketedPaste.ts |    23.8 |      100 |       0 |    23.8 | 19-37             
  ...nchCommand.ts |   95.53 |    83.01 |     100 |   95.53 | ...64-165,289-292 
  ...ompletion.tsx |   97.09 |    87.23 |     100 |   97.09 | ...23-324,334-335 
  ...dMigration.ts |    92.1 |    88.88 |     100 |    92.1 | 42-44             
  useCompletion.ts |   96.29 |    90.56 |     100 |   96.29 | ...17-218,222-223 
  ...nitMessage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...extualTips.ts |   78.26 |       50 |     100 |   78.26 | ...2,75-79,96-104 
  ...eteCommand.ts |   89.52 |    90.69 |     100 |   89.52 | ...98-106,114-115 
  ...ialogClose.ts |   36.11 |       10 |     100 |   36.11 | ...89-195,202-207 
  useDiffData.ts   |   11.62 |      100 |       0 |   11.62 | 44-87             
  ...oublePress.ts |   53.12 |       75 |     100 |   53.12 | 33-35,41-54       
  ...orSettings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Completion.ts |   99.12 |    97.67 |     100 |   99.12 | 182-183           
  ...ionUpdates.ts |   93.72 |    92.98 |     100 |   93.72 | ...87-291,314-320 
  ...agerDialog.ts |   88.88 |      100 |     100 |   88.88 | 21,25             
  ...backDialog.ts |    63.9 |    76.47 |   66.66 |    63.9 | ...66-168,190-191 
  useFocus.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...olderTrust.ts |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 62                
  ...ggestions.tsx |   96.47 |    78.94 |     100 |   96.47 | 121,155-156       
  ...miniStream.ts |   87.41 |    84.11 |   78.26 |   87.41 | ...5812-5814,5816 
  ...BranchName.ts |     100 |    94.44 |     100 |     100 | 54                
  ...oryManager.ts |   98.38 |    98.85 |     100 |   98.38 | 141-144           
  ...ooksDialog.ts |    87.5 |      100 |     100 |    87.5 | 19,23             
  ...stListener.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nAuthError.ts |   76.19 |       50 |     100 |   76.19 | 39-40,43-45       
  ...putHistory.ts |   92.59 |    85.71 |     100 |   92.59 | 63-64,72,94-96    
  ...storyStore.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 69                
  useKeypress.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rdProtocol.ts |   36.36 |      100 |       0 |   36.36 | 24-31             
  ...unchEditor.ts |   22.58 |      100 |      50 |   22.58 | 11-32,44-85       
  ...gIndicator.ts |     100 |    96.66 |     100 |     100 | 109               
  useLogger.ts     |      16 |      100 |       0 |      16 | 15-45             
  useMCPHealth.ts  |   10.52 |      100 |       0 |   10.52 | 36-75             
  ...cpApproval.ts |   93.12 |    86.11 |     100 |   93.12 | ...24-127,139-140 
  useMcpDialog.ts  |    87.5 |      100 |     100 |    87.5 | 19,23             
  ...moryDialog.ts |    87.5 |      100 |     100 |    87.5 | 19,23             
  ...oryMonitor.ts |   83.14 |    78.57 |     100 |   83.14 | 54-63,74-79       
  ...ssageQueue.ts |     100 |     97.4 |     100 |     100 | 175,262           
  ...delCommand.ts |     100 |       96 |     100 |     100 | 61                
  ...ouseEvents.ts |   94.89 |       95 |   83.33 |   94.89 | 78-82             
  ...raseCycler.ts |   84.74 |    76.47 |     100 |   84.74 | ...49,52-53,69-71 
  ...rredEditor.ts |   58.33 |    22.22 |     100 |   58.33 | 23-27,29-33       
  ...derUpdates.ts |   85.29 |    80.28 |    92.3 |   85.29 | ...36,351-361,441 
  useQwenAuth.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lScheduler.ts |   89.13 |     86.9 |     100 |   89.13 | ...61-463,496-506 
  ...oryCommand.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-7               
  ...umeCommand.ts |    95.4 |    77.77 |     100 |    95.4 | 133-134,236-241   
  ...ompletion.tsx |   90.67 |    83.33 |     100 |   90.67 | ...02,105,138-141 
  ...ectionList.ts |   97.12 |    96.19 |     100 |   97.12 | ...92-193,247-250 
  ...sionPicker.ts |   92.87 |    90.35 |     100 |   92.87 | ...99-501,503-505 
  ...earchInput.ts |     100 |    97.29 |     100 |     100 | 82                
  ...ngsCommand.ts |   18.75 |      100 |       0 |   18.75 | 10-25             
  ...ellHistory.ts |   93.28 |    80.95 |     100 |   93.28 | ...96,153-154,164 
  ...oryCommand.ts |   85.48 |    58.33 |     100 |   85.48 | 22-28,40,71       
  ...agerDialog.ts |   88.23 |      100 |     100 |   88.23 | 20,24             
  ...Completion.ts |   82.79 |    85.33 |   94.73 |   82.79 | ...86-688,696-732 
  ...tateAndRef.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tatsDialog.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  useStatusLine.ts |   97.32 |    93.93 |     100 |   97.32 | ...18-422,518-525 
  ...eateDialog.ts |   88.23 |      100 |     100 |   88.23 | 14,18             
  ...mInProcess.ts |   27.35 |       80 |      25 |   27.35 | ...82-183,186-188 
  ...tification.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 50                
  ...alProgress.ts |   67.34 |    58.82 |   66.66 |   67.34 | 52-53,61-68,79-85 
  ...rminalSize.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...emeCommand.ts |    79.2 |    35.29 |     100 |    79.2 | ...15-116,120-121 
  useTimer.ts      |   97.59 |    94.73 |     100 |   97.59 | 17-18             
  ...lMigration.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...rustModify.ts |     100 |    90.47 |     100 |     100 | 112,134           
  useTurnDiffs.ts  |   95.12 |    78.57 |     100 |   95.12 | 133-134,156-157   
  ...elcomeBack.ts |   87.36 |     90.9 |     100 |   87.36 | ...,94-96,114-115 
  ...reeSession.ts |   93.75 |       70 |     100 |   93.75 | 47-48,72          
  vim.ts           |      74 |    67.56 |   69.23 |      74 | ...1854-1861,1869 
 src/ui/layouts    |   91.25 |    89.47 |     100 |   91.25 |                   
  ...AppLayout.tsx |   90.99 |     87.5 |     100 |   90.99 | 61-63,111-116,152 
  ...AppLayout.tsx |   91.66 |    92.85 |     100 |   91.66 | 75-80             
 src/ui/models     |   80.72 |       80 |   71.42 |   80.72 |                   
  ...ableModels.ts |   80.72 |       80 |   71.42 |   80.72 | ...,61-71,125-127 
 ...noninteractive |     100 |      100 |    6.66 |     100 |                   
  ...eractiveUi.ts |     100 |      100 |    6.66 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/selection  |   93.56 |    86.19 |     100 |   93.56 |                   
  screen-buffer.ts |   94.73 |    66.66 |     100 |   94.73 | 51-52             
  ...ion-coords.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ction-span.ts |   93.81 |     92.1 |     100 |   93.81 | ...1,45-46,99-100 
  ...tion-state.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ction-text.ts |   93.85 |    93.44 |     100 |   93.85 | 30-34,130-131     
  ...selection.tsx |   91.88 |    78.57 |     100 |   91.88 | ...16-417,446-447 
 src/ui/state      |      95 |    81.81 |     100 |      95 |                   
  extensions.ts    |      95 |    81.81 |     100 |      95 | 69-70,89          
 src/ui/themes     |    98.5 |    73.17 |     100 |    98.5 |                   
  ansi-light.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ansi.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  atom-one-dark.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ayu-light.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ayu.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  color-utils.ts   |   99.23 |    97.05 |     100 |   99.23 | 277-278           
  default-light.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  default.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...inal-theme.ts |   88.59 |    85.96 |     100 |   88.59 | ...57-261,266-270 
  dracula.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  github-dark.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  github-light.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  googlecode.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  no-color.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  qwen-dark.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  qwen-light.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tic-tokens.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-of-purple.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  theme-manager.ts |   88.68 |    84.52 |     100 |   88.68 | ...83-392,397-398 
  theme.ts         |     100 |    38.02 |     100 |     100 | ...34-449,457-461 
  xcode.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/utils      |   87.72 |    85.81 |   96.06 |   87.72 |                   
  ...Colorizer.tsx |   80.31 |    85.41 |     100 |   80.31 | ...00-201,313-339 
  ...nRenderer.tsx |   80.07 |     75.6 |     100 |   80.07 | ...70,274,332-333 
  ...wnDisplay.tsx |   92.87 |     93.5 |     100 |   92.87 | ...,955,1002-1020 
  ...idDiagram.tsx |   87.79 |    95.34 |     100 |   87.79 | 156-179           
  ...eRenderer.tsx |   93.63 |    81.77 |   95.23 |   93.63 | ...47-750,803-808 
  ...odeDisplay.ts |   94.28 |    85.71 |     100 |   94.28 | 23,40             
  asciiCharts.ts   |    96.7 |     87.5 |     100 |    96.7 | 170-177,278       
  ...dWorkUtils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...boardUtils.ts |    52.9 |    74.15 |    92.3 |    52.9 | ...29,632-641,644 
  commandUtils.ts  |   98.61 |    93.27 |     100 |   98.61 | 189,217-218,424   
  computeStats.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  customBanner.ts  |   90.68 |    91.22 |     100 |   90.68 | ...13,324-327,334 
  displayUtils.ts  |   73.84 |    73.91 |     100 |   73.84 | ...34,36-40,42-46 
  formatters.ts    |   94.87 |    98.21 |     100 |   94.87 | 116-119           
  goal-runtime.ts  |   91.42 |       95 |     100 |   91.42 | 32-34             
  gradientUtils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  highlight.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...gap-notice.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...oryMapping.ts |     100 |    95.65 |     100 |     100 | 45,151            
  historyUtils.ts  |   96.07 |     97.1 |     100 |   96.07 | 104-107           
  ...mage-parts.ts |   97.75 |    94.59 |     100 |   97.75 | 82-83             
  inline-math.ts   |   98.48 |    95.23 |     100 |   98.48 | 129-130           
  input-mouse.ts   |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 48,93             
  isNarrowWidth.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...olDetector.ts |   68.81 |       75 |   66.66 |   68.81 | ...27-132,160-161 
  latexRenderer.ts |   94.95 |     73.8 |     100 |   94.95 | ...76-178,184-187 
  layoutUtils.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  list-mouse.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ightLoader.ts |     100 |       95 |     100 |     100 | 81                
  ...nUtilities.ts |   98.72 |    94.36 |     100 |   98.72 | 145-146           
  ...t-position.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 85                
  ...geRenderer.ts |   86.51 |    70.16 |   95.12 |   86.51 | ...1286,1326-1332 
  ...alRenderer.ts |   86.69 |     71.9 |     100 |   86.69 | ...1476,1513-1519 
  ...lsBySource.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 84                
  mouse.ts         |   92.85 |    74.19 |     100 |   92.85 | ...38,145,149-152 
  osc8.ts          |   91.33 |    79.03 |     100 |   91.33 | ...73,273,277-278 
  ...red-height.ts |   98.38 |    97.14 |     100 |   98.38 | 195-197           
  ...mConstants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  restoreGoal.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...storyUtils.ts |   83.24 |    80.12 |     100 |   83.24 | ...02-624,755-756 
  ...ickerUtils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...evel-label.ts |   77.77 |    66.66 |     100 |   77.77 | 18,22-24          
  ...are-cursor.ts |   89.47 |    85.71 |     100 |   89.47 | 39-44             
  ...ataService.ts |   93.17 |     79.1 |     100 |   93.17 | ...14,227,254-256 
  suggestions.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...izedOutput.ts |   95.19 |      100 |   88.88 |   95.19 | 121-126           
  ...nal-buffer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-renderer.ts |   90.61 |    83.44 |     100 |   90.61 | ...80,482-484,607 
  ...ize-reflow.ts |     100 |     92.3 |     100 |     100 | 57,62,209,217,347 
  ...wOptimizer.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 33,76             
  terminalSetup.ts |    4.37 |      100 |       0 |    4.37 | 44-393            
  textUtils.ts     |   98.71 |    95.72 |     100 |   98.71 | 292-293,478-479   
  ...background.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  todoSnapshot.ts  |   90.42 |    92.85 |     100 |   90.42 | ...06-207,240-241 
  ...isplay-map.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  updateCheck.ts   |     100 |    92.75 |     100 |     100 | 227-239,331       
  windowTitle.ts   |   96.55 |    94.73 |     100 |   96.55 | 56-57             
  ...ow-keyword.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...i/utils/export |   75.03 |     60.1 |   94.59 |   75.03 |                   
  collect.ts       |   71.27 |    65.81 |      96 |   71.27 | ...90-633,655-656 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  normalize.ts     |   80.42 |    51.35 |     100 |   80.42 | ...59-364,376-378 
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  utils.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ort/formatters |   52.92 |    47.22 |   71.42 |   52.92 |                   
  html.ts          |   84.61 |       50 |     100 |   84.61 | ...53,57-58,62-63 
  json.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  jsonl.ts         |   82.45 |     37.5 |     100 |   82.45 | ...48,50-51,65-66 
  markdown.ts      |   36.32 |    47.05 |      50 |   36.32 | ...16-219,233-295 
 src/ui/voice      |   81.27 |    79.64 |   81.94 |   81.27 |                   
  ...d-recorder.ts |     6.2 |        0 |       0 |     6.2 | ...33-159,162-163 
  ...o-recorder.ts |   84.61 |    93.33 |   57.14 |   84.61 | ...16-117,131-136 
  ...me-session.ts |   91.09 |     92.1 |     100 |   91.09 | ...99,305,316-319 
  sox-recorder.ts  |    92.7 |    71.87 |     100 |    92.7 | ...34-135,153-154 
  ...ailability.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-keyterms.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  voice-model.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-recorder.ts |   88.29 |    67.74 |   81.81 |   88.29 | ...,98-99,112,115 
  voice-refine.ts  |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 92                
  ...ream-retry.ts |   86.79 |       70 |     100 |   86.79 | 16-18,48-49,59-60 
  ...am-session.ts |   88.02 |    66.66 |   84.61 |   88.02 | ...26,343-345,363 
  ...ranscriber.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/utils         |   83.15 |    87.83 |   93.19 |   83.15 |                   
  ...p-profiler.ts |   98.39 |    92.59 |     100 |   98.39 | 141,185,235       
  acpModelUtils.ts |   97.36 |    95.19 |     100 |   97.36 | ...09-210,214-215 
  apiPreconnect.ts |   96.74 |    94.59 |     100 |   96.74 | 167-170           
  ...ol-call-id.ts |   84.61 |       60 |     100 |   84.61 | 26-27,37-38       
  ...ng-failure.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  checks.ts        |   33.33 |      100 |       0 |   33.33 | 23-28             
  ...-api-error.ts |     100 |    96.42 |     100 |     100 | 14                
  cleanup.ts       |   84.05 |    94.11 |      80 |   84.05 | 80,111-121        
  commands.ts      |   97.45 |    96.66 |     100 |   97.45 | 153-155           
  ...y-identity.ts |   87.06 |    81.91 |     100 |   87.06 | ...70-371,378-379 
  ...Calculator.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cpuProfiler.ts   |   70.73 |    73.23 |   88.88 |   70.73 | ...27,430-431,438 
  deepMerge.ts     |     100 |    89.65 |     100 |     100 | 41-43,49          
  ...re-runtime.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ScopeUtils.ts |   97.56 |    88.88 |     100 |   97.56 | 67                
  doctorChecks.ts  |   70.31 |    74.57 |     100 |   70.31 | ...95-301,325-341 
  ...putCapture.ts |   90.65 |    86.31 |     100 |   90.65 | ...73,371,373-374 
  ...arResolver.ts |   97.14 |    96.55 |     100 |   97.14 | 125-126           
  errors.ts        |   97.56 |    94.64 |     100 |   97.56 | 69-70,304-305     
  events.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-mention.ts |   88.48 |     82.6 |     100 |   88.48 | ...56-160,164-168 
  findings.ts      |   96.02 |    92.15 |     100 |   96.02 | ...1249,1258-1259 
  gitUtils.ts      |   92.85 |    86.66 |     100 |   92.85 | ...13-116,164-167 
  ...AutoUpdate.ts |   93.54 |    94.64 |      90 |   93.54 | 126,131,202-213   
  ...tyWarnings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lationInfo.ts |   97.81 |    94.69 |     100 |   97.81 | ...03,420-421,466 
  ...projection.ts |   95.27 |    95.58 |     100 |   95.27 | 140-145           
  jsonc-editor.ts  |   93.18 |    92.66 |     100 |   93.18 | ...80-381,384-385 
  languageUtils.ts |   98.88 |    97.01 |     100 |   98.88 | 184-185           
  load-undici.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...npm-update.ts |   86.64 |    77.02 |     100 |   86.64 | ...03-304,335-345 
  math.ts          |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-15              
  ...er-mention.ts |     100 |    66.66 |     100 |     100 | 14,30,44-46       
  ...iagnostics.ts |   94.57 |    83.01 |   88.88 |   94.57 | ...05,311,315-317 
  ...serMessage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...onfigUtils.ts |   94.25 |    91.17 |     100 |   94.25 | ...30,436,439-443 
  ...iveHelpers.ts |   95.14 |    91.79 |     100 |   95.14 | ...54-455,553,566 
  osc.ts           |   97.18 |      100 |    87.5 |   97.18 | 182-183           
  package.ts       |   88.88 |    85.71 |     100 |   88.88 | 31-32             
  paths.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...uggestions.ts |   84.29 |    70.83 |     100 |   84.29 | 70-76,92-103      
  processUtils.ts  |    92.3 |       80 |     100 |    92.3 | 45-46             
  readStdin.ts     |   93.67 |    94.11 |   85.71 |   93.67 | 79-83             
  relaunch.ts      |   95.87 |    89.28 |     100 |   95.87 | 103-105,131       
  resolvePath.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  runBudget.ts     |   99.35 |    96.77 |     100 |   99.35 | 119               
  sandbox-path.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sandbox.ts       |   45.52 |    59.42 |   76.92 |   45.52 | ...1045,1057-1080 
  ...xImageName.ts |     100 |    77.77 |     100 |     100 | 10,18             
  sandboxMounts.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-path-argv.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sessionPaths.ts  |   90.84 |    90.56 |     100 |   90.84 | ...81-182,185-186 
  settingsUtils.ts |   80.82 |     89.2 |   85.18 |   80.82 | ...89-607,614-622 
  shell-args.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  spawnWrapper.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ate-verify.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...one-update.ts |   39.81 |    77.44 |   62.16 |   39.81 | ...1193,1196-1215 
  ...upProfiler.ts |   98.47 |    94.66 |     100 |   98.47 | 132-133,308       
  ...upWarnings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  stdioHelpers.ts  |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 23                
  systemInfo.ts    |   95.09 |    90.27 |     100 |   95.09 | ...54-255,260-264 
  ...InfoFields.ts |    87.5 |    65.85 |     100 |    87.5 | ...24-125,146-147 
  ...alSequence.ts |     100 |    97.61 |     100 |     100 | 60                
  ...iagnostics.ts |    95.8 |     87.5 |   93.75 |    95.8 | ...03,277-278,289 
  ...iffPreview.ts |   76.47 |       25 |     100 |   76.47 | 13,17,23-24       
  ...on-handler.ts |    73.8 |       75 |     100 |    73.8 | 17-18,25-26,67-73 
  ...e-relaunch.ts |   89.61 |    86.66 |      50 |   89.61 | 56-61,83-84       
  ...entEmitter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ansionHook.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...upWarnings.ts |   87.75 |       75 |     100 |   87.75 | 47-48,53-54,57-58 
  version.ts       |     100 |    66.66 |     100 |     100 | 11                
  ...ingHandler.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...WithBackup.ts |   65.04 |    77.77 |     100 |   65.04 | 97,112,133-172    
 ...s/housekeeping |   93.51 |    90.95 |   96.96 |   93.51 |                   
  cleanup.ts       |   92.59 |    93.75 |     100 |   92.59 | ...02-205,209-211 
  ...eractionAt.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  scheduler.ts     |      93 |    88.34 |      95 |      93 | ...57-359,411-415 
  throttledOnce.ts |   95.95 |    93.93 |     100 |   95.95 | 77-78,153-154     
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------

Core Package - Full Text Report

-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
File               | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | Uncovered Line #s 
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
All files          |   88.23 |     86.8 |   89.89 |   88.23 |                   
 src               |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/__mocks__/fs  |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  promises.ts      |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-48              
 src/agents        |   89.63 |    83.96 |   94.11 |   89.63 |                   
  ...transcript.ts |   88.49 |    84.09 |     100 |   88.49 | ...32,640,646-650 
  ...ent-resume.ts |   85.59 |    77.75 |   83.33 |   85.59 | ...1794-1798,1801 
  ...ound-tasks.ts |   94.63 |    90.13 |   96.38 |   94.63 | ...1773,1793-1796 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ent-result.ts |    96.8 |    92.68 |     100 |    96.8 | 106,129-131       
  ...n-registry.ts |   94.86 |    87.26 |    98.3 |   94.86 | ...1463,1477-1479 
  ...w-snapshot.ts |   75.73 |    72.22 |    87.5 |   75.73 | ...21,445,452-454 
  worktree-pin.ts  |     100 |    88.23 |     100 |     100 | 78,99             
 src/agents/arena  |   76.94 |    68.22 |   78.94 |   76.94 |                   
  ...gentClient.ts |   79.47 |    88.88 |   81.81 |   79.47 | ...68-183,189-204 
  ArenaManager.ts  |   75.89 |     65.2 |   78.57 |   75.89 | ...1887,1893-1894 
  arena-events.ts  |   64.44 |      100 |      50 |   64.44 | ...71-175,178-183 
  diff-summary.ts  |    87.5 |    72.34 |     100 |    87.5 | ...32-133,137-138 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...gents/backends |   78.07 |    85.19 |   76.12 |   78.07 |                   
  ITermBackend.ts  |   97.97 |    93.93 |     100 |   97.97 | ...78-180,255,307 
  ...essBackend.ts |   90.87 |    85.24 |   93.18 |   90.87 | ...83,685,687-688 
  TmuxBackend.ts   |    90.7 |    76.55 |   97.36 |    90.7 | ...87,697,743-747 
  detect.ts        |   31.25 |      100 |       0 |   31.25 | 34-88             
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  iterm-it2.ts     |     100 |     92.1 |     100 |     100 | 37-38,106         
  tmux-commands.ts |    6.64 |      100 |    3.03 |    6.64 | ...93-363,386-503 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...agents/runtime |   91.77 |     87.1 |   90.46 |   91.77 |                   
  agent-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  agent-core.ts    |   85.15 |    77.02 |   76.66 |   85.15 | ...2388,2434-2436 
  agent-events.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t-headless.ts |   93.49 |    89.41 |   83.33 |   93.49 | ...96-497,500-501 
  ...nteractive.ts |   81.01 |    82.35 |   76.66 |   81.01 | ...33,535-538,541 
  ...statistics.ts |   98.29 |    82.55 |     100 |   98.29 | 141,165,206,239   
  agent-types.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ool-policy.ts |   98.38 |      100 |    92.3 |   98.38 | 85-86             
  ...low-budget.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-scheduler.ts |   97.43 |    96.36 |     100 |   97.43 | 128-130           
  ...ow-journal.ts |   92.78 |    78.12 |     100 |   92.78 | ...49-150,192-194 
  ...ta-literal.ts |   95.96 |    92.59 |     100 |   95.96 | ...78-379,395-396 
  ...chestrator.ts |   93.87 |    90.47 |   91.48 |   93.87 | ...2216,2309-2312 
  ...ow-prompts.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...low-runner.ts |   95.47 |    83.47 |   94.44 |   95.47 | ...44,312,332-335 
  ...ow-sandbox.ts |   96.91 |    91.02 |     100 |   96.91 | ...1704,1710-1711 
  ...flow-saved.ts |   96.51 |    94.36 |     100 |   96.51 | 134-135,234-237   
  ...flow-stall.ts |    97.9 |    83.33 |     100 |    97.9 | 170-171,270       
 src/agents/tasks  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/agents/team   |   82.97 |    84.58 |   89.28 |   82.97 |                   
  TeamManager.ts   |   74.33 |    81.09 |    80.7 |   74.33 | ...1707,1730-1731 
  identity.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sionBridge.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mailbox.ts       |   96.02 |    87.23 |     100 |   96.02 | 352-358           
  ...ptAddendum.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tasks.ts         |   89.29 |    83.08 |     100 |   89.29 | ...1000,1044-1045 
  team-events.ts   |   60.52 |      100 |      50 |   60.52 | ...40-144,151-155 
  teamHelpers.ts   |   91.71 |    94.54 |      95 |   91.71 | ...18-319,355-365 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...eam/test-utils |   95.06 |    95.16 |   98.21 |   95.06 |                   
  ...on-harness.ts |   96.49 |       85 |     100 |   96.49 | 128-129,141-142   
  fake-agent.ts    |     100 |    96.77 |     100 |     100 | 158,167           
  fake-backend.ts  |   86.46 |    97.61 |   95.83 |   86.46 | 124-146           
 src/config        |    84.4 |       87 |   76.02 |    84.4 |                   
  approval-mode.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...xtDefaults.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |   83.72 |    86.73 |   74.59 |   83.72 | ...8958,8962-8963 
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  models.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  storage.ts       |   94.39 |    91.57 |   88.23 |   94.39 | ...45-446,449-450 
 ...nfirmation-bus |   98.27 |    97.22 |     100 |   98.27 |                   
  message-bus.ts   |   98.14 |    97.14 |     100 |   98.14 | 42-43             
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/core          |   92.46 |    88.21 |    93.1 |   92.46 |                   
  ...on-restore.ts |   86.66 |    83.33 |     100 |   86.66 | ...60,63-64,67-68 
  baseLlmClient.ts |    88.4 |     83.8 |   81.81 |    88.4 | ...59,672,678-680 
  client.ts        |   92.66 |    88.18 |   91.01 |   92.66 | ...4320,4418-4419 
  ...tGenerator.ts |   86.34 |    87.34 |   84.61 |   86.34 | ...96-497,542-548 
  ...lScheduler.ts |   89.82 |    84.82 |   94.73 |   89.82 | ...6474,6502-6518 
  geminiChat.ts    |    94.9 |    89.91 |   95.72 |    94.9 | ...5236,5284-5285 
  geminiRequest.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  genai-compat.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...MediaLimit.ts |     100 |       96 |     100 |     100 | 96                
  ...htProtocol.ts |    9.09 |      100 |       0 |    9.09 | ...9,62-66,69-110 
  ...ream-error.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  logger.ts        |   87.41 |    87.02 |     100 |   87.41 | ...64-568,614-628 
  ...lay-buffer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...dispatcher.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tyDefaults.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...olExecutor.ts |   93.54 |    83.33 |      50 |   93.54 | 46-47             
  ...on-helpers.ts |   93.49 |    78.57 |     100 |   93.49 | ...10-211,228-229 
  ...issionFlow.ts |   98.98 |    96.96 |     100 |   98.98 | 109               
  ...try-policy.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ell-policy.ts |   94.89 |    88.54 |     100 |   94.89 | ...51-252,297-298 
  prompts.ts       |   93.64 |    91.42 |   83.33 |   93.64 | ...1209,1412-1413 
  ...ing-effort.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...n-recovery.ts |   95.13 |       80 |     100 |   95.13 | ...06-107,142-144 
  ...t-profiler.ts |    97.9 |    81.15 |   88.23 |    97.9 | 117,124-125,130   
  ...port-retry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tokenLimits.ts   |     100 |    91.89 |     100 |     100 | 87,122-139        
  ...reparation.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tion-guard.ts |   90.38 |    94.73 |     100 |   90.38 | 83-87             
  ...allIdUtils.ts |   98.81 |    91.22 |     100 |   98.81 | 43,52             
  ...okTriggers.ts |   99.45 |    92.43 |     100 |   99.45 | 182,193           
  ...terruption.ts |     100 |     92.3 |     100 |     100 | 86,104            
  turn.ts          |   99.19 |    94.48 |     100 |   99.19 | 698-699,768       
  ...l-fallback.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ntentGenerator |   96.33 |    88.12 |   96.15 |   96.33 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   97.24 |    86.72 |   94.87 |   97.24 | ...1436,1465,1476 
  converter.ts     |   96.19 |    89.25 |     100 |   96.19 | ...1329,1550-1552 
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-21              
  usage.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ntentGenerator |   88.78 |    72.36 |   89.47 |   88.78 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   87.18 |    71.83 |   88.88 |   87.18 | ...58-364,382-383 
  index.ts         |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 50                
 ...ntentGenerator |   96.12 |     91.3 |    90.9 |   96.12 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   96.06 |    90.75 |   90.47 |   96.06 | ...1309-1310,1338 
  ...tDetection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ntentGenerator |    91.9 |    90.55 |   95.79 |    91.9 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  converter.ts     |    91.3 |    89.49 |   96.87 |    91.3 | ...1942,2111-2126 
  errorHandler.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |   68.25 |    82.35 |      50 |   68.25 | 44-53,74-78,90-94 
  ...tGenerator.ts |    66.4 |    70.58 |   88.88 |    66.4 | ...51-157,168-169 
  pipeline.ts      |   95.27 |     90.9 |     100 |   95.27 | ...1434,1442,1541 
  ...ix-caching.ts |   95.23 |    92.85 |     100 |   95.23 | 45-46,69-70       
  ...ureContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ingOptions.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  ...CallParser.ts |   92.24 |     92.4 |     100 |   92.24 | ...28-529,549-552 
  ...kingParser.ts |     100 |    96.87 |     100 |     100 | 42                
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...rator/provider |   97.39 |    92.28 |    98.5 |   97.39 |                   
  dashscope.ts     |   98.36 |    95.08 |   96.42 |   98.36 | ...08-709,851-852 
  deepseek.ts      |   94.91 |    89.36 |     100 |   94.91 | ...31-132,145-146 
  default.ts       |   99.18 |    97.05 |     100 |   99.18 | 208               
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mimo.ts          |   94.11 |    66.66 |     100 |   94.11 | 29,52-53          
  minimax.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mistral.ts       |   96.07 |    73.33 |     100 |   96.07 | 32-33             
  modelscope.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  utils.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zai.ts           |   92.13 |    82.14 |     100 |   92.13 | ...,39-40,135-137 
 src/extension     |   88.49 |    85.67 |   93.22 |   88.49 |                   
  ...ive-safety.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-converter.ts |   80.55 |    73.66 |     100 |   80.55 | ...1133,1179-1180 
  corruptFile.ts   |     100 |       50 |     100 |     100 | 40-45             
  ...-converter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...redentials.ts |   95.33 |    89.47 |     100 |   95.33 | ...21-122,173-175 
  ...me-refresh.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sion-store.ts |   92.82 |    89.23 |    98.3 |   92.82 | ...1641-1647,1691 
  ...ionManager.ts |   84.46 |    83.47 |      83 |   84.46 | ...3126,3164-3165 
  ...references.ts |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | ...05,129,197,200 
  ...onSettings.ts |    92.3 |     94.4 |     100 |    92.3 | ...98-501,570-571 
  ...-converter.ts |    75.9 |    85.71 |   85.71 |    75.9 | ...98,202,214-248 
  github.ts        |   91.85 |    84.88 |     100 |   91.85 | ...1032-1033,1043 
  http-client.ts   |   84.61 |       80 |     100 |   84.61 | 20-21             
  i18n.ts          |   78.26 |       96 |      50 |   78.26 | 104-110,116-123   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  marketplace.ts   |   88.39 |    83.11 |     100 |   88.39 | ...08,494,507-508 
  ...ork-policy.ts |   89.72 |       90 |     100 |   89.72 | ...36,148-154,156 
  npm.ts           |   89.02 |    81.81 |     100 |   89.02 | ...86-688,695-700 
  override.ts      |   94.11 |    93.54 |     100 |   94.11 | 63-64,81-82       
  ...-converter.ts |   94.89 |    90.41 |     100 |   94.89 | ...50-151,222-224 
  redaction.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  settings.ts      |   66.26 |      100 |      50 |   66.26 | 81-107,141-146    
  ...ceRegistry.ts |   94.01 |    83.33 |     100 |   94.01 | ...38-344,365-366 
  storage.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ableSchema.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  variables.ts     |   88.95 |    84.21 |     100 |   88.95 | ...32-235,238-241 
  ...extraction.ts |   85.77 |       81 |   89.47 |   85.77 | ...02-205,260-261 
 ...ent-plugins-v1 |   84.94 |    79.51 |     100 |   84.94 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  manifest.ts      |   81.87 |    84.48 |     100 |   81.87 | ...55-156,161-174 
  mcp.ts           |   84.98 |    79.56 |     100 |   84.98 | ...88-389,419-420 
  paths.ts         |     100 |    94.44 |     100 |     100 | 59                
  skills.ts        |   82.31 |    63.88 |     100 |   82.31 | ...38-141,150-151 
 src/followup      |   84.58 |    81.04 |   86.84 |   84.58 |                   
  followupState.ts |   98.44 |    95.74 |     100 |   98.44 | 236-237           
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  overlayFs.ts     |   96.29 |    88.88 |     100 |   96.29 | 78,108,122        
  speculation.ts   |   75.98 |    67.22 |   58.33 |   75.98 | ...42-743,750-751 
  ...onToolGate.ts |   97.97 |     87.5 |     100 |   97.97 | 105,110           
  ...nGenerator.ts |   86.27 |    87.65 |     100 |   86.27 | ...42-247,359-361 
 src/generated     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  git-commit.ts    |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-10              
 src/goals         |   93.04 |    89.37 |   94.58 |   93.04 |                   
  ...eGoalStore.ts |   87.61 |    88.88 |   86.66 |   87.61 | ...85-188,196-204 
  ...t-verifier.ts |   96.27 |    91.17 |     100 |   96.27 | ...20,143-146,163 
  ...checkpoint.ts |   81.48 |    76.19 |     100 |   81.48 | ...02-105,115-118 
  goal-evidence.ts |   88.34 |    87.76 |   97.61 |   88.34 | ...1162,1185-1188 
  ...projection.ts |   66.66 |    72.97 |   33.33 |   66.66 | ...87,190,194-196 
  ...ersistence.ts |   87.36 |    85.71 |    87.5 |   87.36 | ...53-154,185-190 
  goal-protocol.ts |   96.87 |    95.65 |     100 |   96.87 | 215-216           
  goal-reducer.ts  |   95.25 |    92.82 |   97.29 |   95.25 | ...73,552,570-571 
  goal-runtime.ts  |   96.93 |    89.93 |   95.83 |   96.93 | ...1345-1346,1476 
  goal-tools.ts    |   98.38 |    94.17 |   95.83 |   98.38 | ...05-206,307-308 
  ...rn-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  goal-verifier.ts |   92.46 |    93.02 |     100 |   92.46 | ...69-172,185-187 
  goal-wire.ts     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-28              
  goalHook.ts      |   96.91 |    92.42 |     100 |   96.91 | 115-120,221-222   
  goalJudge.ts     |   95.84 |    87.09 |     100 |   95.84 | ...55-356,448-449 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/hooks         |   88.07 |    86.35 |   88.54 |   88.07 |                   
  ...okRegistry.ts |   86.48 |    77.08 |     100 |   86.48 | ...41-344,362-369 
  ...bortSignal.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  context-usage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...terpolator.ts |   96.66 |    93.33 |     100 |   96.66 | 66-67             
  ...HookRunner.ts |   96.68 |    87.23 |     100 |   96.68 | 110-112,231-233   
  ...Aggregator.ts |   96.57 |    91.48 |     100 |   96.57 | ...20-321,402,404 
  ...entHandler.ts |   95.57 |    84.76 |   94.73 |   95.57 | ...1040-1041,1051 
  hookPlanner.ts   |   87.55 |    85.54 |   86.66 |   87.55 | ...22-226,233-244 
  hookRegistry.ts  |   92.53 |    85.43 |     100 |   92.53 | ...39,458,462,466 
  hookRunner.ts    |   62.65 |    72.34 |   66.66 |   62.65 | ...70-771,780-781 
  hookSystem.ts    |   87.64 |     98.5 |   70.83 |   87.64 | ...58-759,765-766 
  ...HookRunner.ts |   79.06 |    66.66 |      80 |   79.06 | ...33-434,452-456 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...edCallback.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...HookRunner.ts |   94.19 |    84.37 |   81.81 |   94.19 | ...76-384,458-459 
  ...SkillHooks.ts |   78.75 |       75 |   66.66 |   78.75 | 62-66,137-152     
  ...oksManager.ts |   94.87 |    88.88 |     100 |   94.87 | ...84,325,327-329 
  ssrfGuard.ts     |   86.45 |    89.13 |     100 |   86.45 | ...85,289-295,301 
  stopHookCap.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  trustedHooks.ts  |      90 |    52.63 |     100 |      90 | ...53,66-67,97-98 
  types.ts         |   94.25 |    96.09 |   88.88 |   94.25 | ...46-547,632-636 
  urlValidator.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...it-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ide           |   76.98 |    85.03 |   79.03 |   76.98 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  detect-ide.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ide-client.ts    |   69.16 |    84.65 |   68.29 |   69.16 | ...1068,1097-1105 
  ide-installer.ts |   89.06 |    79.31 |     100 |   89.06 | ...36,143-147,160 
  ideContext.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  process-utils.ts |   84.84 |    71.79 |     100 |   84.84 | ...37,151,193-194 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/lsp           |   58.96 |    70.67 |   66.49 |   58.96 |                   
  ...nfigLoader.ts |   80.55 |    72.22 |   95.65 |   80.55 | ...02-504,508-514 
  ...ionFactory.ts |   42.81 |    73.07 |      50 |   42.81 | ...76-427,433-450 
  ...Normalizer.ts |   23.09 |    13.72 |   30.43 |   23.09 | ...04-905,909-924 
  ...verManager.ts |   75.73 |     80.1 |   79.66 |   75.73 | ...1346,1352-1382 
  ...eLspClient.ts |   32.78 |    81.81 |   21.05 |   32.78 | ...89-293,299-300 
  ...LspService.ts |      60 |    73.36 |   78.26 |      60 | ...1575,1635-1645 
  configHash.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/mcp           |    82.3 |    77.81 |   78.33 |    82.3 |                   
  configHash.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...h-provider.ts |   86.95 |      100 |   33.33 |   86.95 | ...,93,97,101-102 
  ...h-provider.ts |   79.31 |    58.06 |     100 |   79.31 | ...26-933,940-942 
  ...en-storage.ts |   98.78 |    97.95 |     100 |   98.78 | 106-107           
  oauth-utils.ts   |   73.61 |    85.48 |    92.3 |   73.61 | ...46-366,392-421 
  ...n-provider.ts |   89.83 |       96 |   45.45 |   89.83 | ...43,147,151-152 
 .../token-storage |   82.12 |    88.48 |   89.28 |   82.12 |                   
  ...en-storage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...en-storage.ts |   87.08 |    87.71 |   95.23 |   87.08 | ...00-201,214-215 
  ...en-storage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...en-storage.ts |   68.14 |    82.35 |   64.28 |   68.14 | ...81-295,298-314 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/memory        |   88.07 |     84.5 |   90.62 |   88.07 |                   
  ...y-document.ts |   89.52 |    84.61 |     100 |   89.52 | ...24-325,329-330 
  ...nel-memory.ts |   97.36 |    96.63 |   96.42 |   97.36 | ...91-293,367-368 
  const.ts         |   94.28 |     92.3 |     100 |   94.28 | 66-67             
  dream.ts         |    64.6 |    72.22 |      50 |    64.6 | ...04-109,124-165 
  ...entPlanner.ts |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 135,145           
  entries.ts       |   75.59 |    84.84 |   83.33 |   75.59 | ...56-157,172-180 
  extract.ts       |   92.41 |    79.41 |     100 |   92.41 | 56-61,100,119-122 
  ...entPlanner.ts |   91.55 |    76.74 |     100 |   91.55 | ...05,114-117,292 
  ...ionPlanner.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  forget.ts        |   81.83 |       75 |   83.33 |   81.83 | ...51,474,478-507 
  indexer.ts       |   94.14 |       84 |     100 |   94.14 | ...32-233,334,337 
  ...kill-agent.ts |   97.94 |    89.36 |     100 |   97.94 | 82-83,179-180     
  manager.ts       |    78.4 |    82.29 |   77.77 |    78.4 | ...1482,1495-1497 
  ...ent-config.ts |   86.99 |    82.69 |   86.36 |   86.99 | ...69,389,396-402 
  memoryAge.ts     |   90.47 |    83.33 |     100 |   90.47 | 50-51             
  paths.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ing-skills.ts |     100 |       72 |     100 |     100 | 31-35,73-78,97    
  prompt.ts        |   97.26 |    86.79 |     100 |   97.26 | ...10-218,222,225 
  recall.ts        |   86.86 |    86.36 |   92.85 |   86.86 | ...33-538,571-582 
  refresh.ts       |   93.58 |    89.58 |     100 |   93.58 | ...75-176,183-184 
  ...ceSelector.ts |    93.2 |    85.71 |     100 |    93.2 | ...45-146,148-149 
  remember.ts      |   98.88 |    90.19 |     100 |   98.88 | 50,70             
  scan.ts          |   93.75 |       80 |     100 |   93.75 | ...08-109,154,157 
  scopes.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...et-scanner.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entPlanner.ts |   76.89 |    74.07 |   72.22 |   76.89 | ...47-451,454,460 
  status.ts        |   10.52 |      100 |       0 |   10.52 | 41-98             
  store.ts         |   92.92 |    81.81 |     100 |   92.92 | ...16-117,147-148 
  ...git-status.ts |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 27                
  ...cret-guard.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...emory-sync.ts |   94.24 |    82.85 |     100 |   94.24 | ...34-236,246-247 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ontextFile.ts |   81.21 |     79.1 |   81.81 |   81.21 | ...63-277,291-296 
 src/mocks         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  msw.ts           |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-9               
 src/models        |   92.55 |    88.62 |   91.13 |   92.55 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tor-config.ts |   97.77 |    91.83 |     100 |   97.77 | 155,161,171       
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nfigErrors.ts |   74.22 |       44 |   84.61 |   74.22 | ...,67-74,106-117 
  ...igResolver.ts |   98.71 |    93.33 |     100 |   98.71 | 166,328,334       
  modelRegistry.ts |     100 |    98.11 |     100 |     100 | 177,261           
  modelsConfig.ts  |   89.36 |    86.93 |   88.09 |   89.36 | ...1407,1436-1437 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/output        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-formatter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/permissions   |   83.79 |    91.17 |   71.07 |   83.79 |                   
  autoMode.ts      |   97.66 |    93.13 |     100 |   97.66 | ...82-589,635,712 
  ...transcript.ts |      98 |       84 |     100 |      98 | 200-201           
  classifier.ts    |      94 |    94.54 |     100 |      94 | 158-165,389-393   
  ...erousRules.ts |     100 |    89.36 |     100 |     100 | 110,133,147,175   
  ...alTracking.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-commands.ts |   86.77 |     73.8 |     100 |   86.77 | 131-141,210-214   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-manager.ts |   86.63 |    89.01 |      80 |   86.63 | ...1111,1217-1221 
  rule-parser.ts   |   94.49 |     92.7 |     100 |   94.49 | ...1447,1481-1483 
  ...-semantics.ts |   70.44 |    91.09 |   46.66 |   70.44 | ...2237,2311-2314 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...sifier-prompts |   99.04 |    95.23 |     100 |   99.04 |                   
  system-prompt.ts |   99.04 |    95.23 |     100 |   99.04 | 220               
 src/prompts       |   83.63 |      100 |    87.5 |   83.63 |                   
  mcp-prompts.ts   |   18.18 |      100 |       0 |   18.18 | 11-19             
  ...t-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/providers     |   83.71 |     78.6 |   81.25 |   83.71 |                   
  all-providers.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  install.ts       |   93.11 |     84.5 |     100 |   93.11 | ...56-257,330-331 
  ...der-config.ts |   75.85 |    74.04 |   78.26 |   75.85 | ...73-474,502-503 
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...viders/presets |   97.85 |    91.66 |   63.63 |   97.85 |                   
  ...oding-plan.ts |   87.34 |      100 |       0 |   87.34 | 81-83,86-88,90-93 
  ...a-standard.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...token-plan.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...m-provider.ts |   97.05 |    81.25 |      75 |   97.05 | 118-119           
  deepseek.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  grok.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  idealab.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  minimax.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  modelscope.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  openrouter.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  requesty.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zai.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/qwen          |   85.41 |    78.65 |      96 |   85.41 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   98.64 |    98.18 |     100 |   98.64 | 105-106           
  qwenOAuth2.ts    |   82.79 |    73.45 |    90.9 |   82.79 | ...1205-1221,1251 
  ...kenManager.ts |   85.36 |     76.8 |     100 |   85.36 | ...52-757,778-783 
 src/resources     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/services      |   90.51 |    86.28 |   96.72 |   90.51 |                   
  ...ionTrailer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...llRegistry.ts |   98.48 |    87.28 |     100 |   98.48 | 81-82,105,474-475 
  branch-points.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | ...20,211,224,327 
  ...ionService.ts |   97.72 |    96.53 |     100 |   97.72 | ...1081,1224-1232 
  ...ingService.ts |   92.43 |    87.75 |   94.73 |   92.43 | ...2843,2858-2859 
  ...ttribution.ts |   91.73 |    87.71 |      90 |   91.73 | ...80-685,826-827 
  ...utSlimming.ts |    97.2 |    94.23 |     100 |    97.2 | ...39-340,378-381 
  cronScheduler.ts |   94.17 |    90.45 |      98 |   94.17 | ...1333,1736-1737 
  cronTasksFile.ts |   95.49 |    90.82 |     100 |   95.49 | ...37,346-347,483 
  cronTasksLock.ts |   94.44 |    89.47 |     100 |   94.44 | ...02-103,132-133 
  ...eryService.ts |   96.22 |    93.54 |      90 |   96.22 | 121,155-156,161   
  ...oryService.ts |   88.17 |    79.02 |    92.3 |   88.17 | ...1303,1344-1347 
  fileReadCache.ts |    97.5 |    96.07 |     100 |    97.5 | 349-350,363-364   
  ...temService.ts |    92.8 |    84.68 |   94.11 |    92.8 | ...53,479-486,531 
  ...ratedFiles.ts |      96 |    88.23 |     100 |      96 | 119-120,146-147   
  gitInit.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...reeService.ts |   74.75 |    70.66 |   96.07 |   74.75 | ...2296,2325-2326 
  ...on-service.ts |   87.38 |       72 |     100 |   87.38 | ...01-305,343-344 
  ...references.ts |   98.57 |    91.42 |     100 |   98.57 | 156-157,217-218   
  ...ionService.ts |   98.21 |    97.25 |     100 |   98.21 | ...81-682,729-730 
  ...ticsDumper.ts |   98.37 |    95.23 |     100 |   98.37 | 185-186           
  ...ureMonitor.ts |   95.82 |    90.52 |   97.05 |   95.82 | ...60,861,875-877 
  ...orRegistry.ts |   97.22 |    90.99 |     100 |   97.22 | ...55-456,609-610 
  ...ttachments.ts |   97.74 |     90.9 |     100 |   97.74 | 298-308,646       
  ...pi-history.ts |   98.94 |    88.88 |     100 |   98.94 | 43                
  ...ersistence.ts |   91.67 |    80.64 |     100 |   91.67 | ...1062-1063,1091 
  ...tory-state.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 31                
  ...on-service.ts |   94.49 |     92.3 |   97.22 |   94.49 | ...98-600,656-664 
  ...pr-service.ts |   96.22 |    89.13 |     100 |   96.22 | 90-93             
  ...ce-service.ts |    98.5 |    94.11 |    90.9 |    98.5 | 64-65             
  ...n-registry.ts |   98.73 |    96.29 |     100 |   98.73 | 584,638-639,692   
  ...ken-counts.ts |     100 |       96 |     100 |     100 | 58                
  ...ipt-reader.ts |    93.7 |    91.22 |    97.8 |    93.7 | ...2791-2792,2869 
  ...turn-state.ts |   94.11 |     90.9 |   91.66 |   94.11 | 108-112,129-130   
  ...est-helper.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-65              
  ...iter-lease.ts |   82.45 |    74.11 |   97.61 |   82.45 | ...2433,2445-2448 
  sessionRecap.ts  |   67.56 |    43.47 |     100 |   67.56 | ...60,178,180-183 
  ...ionService.ts |   89.61 |    87.01 |    93.4 |   89.61 | ...3013,3027-3047 
  sessionTitle.ts  |   96.29 |    79.41 |     100 |   96.29 | ...00-303,334-335 
  ...ionService.ts |   84.43 |    78.45 |   97.18 |   84.43 | ...2496,2502-2507 
  ...pInhibitor.ts |   97.42 |    92.77 |     100 |   97.42 | ...30,169,369-370 
  ...Estimation.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 118               
  ...ageService.ts |   97.76 |    91.59 |   93.75 |   97.76 | ...61-262,366,567 
  ...ite-origin.ts |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 32                
  ...UseSummary.ts |   94.63 |    88.46 |     100 |   94.63 | ...62-164,214-215 
  ...rd-service.ts |     100 |    88.37 |     100 |     100 | ...29,145-146,241 
  ...oryService.ts |   90.76 |    84.07 |     100 |   90.76 | ...10-513,565-566 
  ...reeCleanup.ts |   14.42 |      100 |   33.33 |   14.42 | 58-186            
  ...ionService.ts |   88.36 |     87.8 |     100 |   88.36 | ...48-449,465-466 
 ...icrocompaction |   98.91 |    95.08 |     100 |   98.91 |                   
  microcompact.ts  |   98.91 |    95.08 |     100 |   98.91 | ...60,769,778-779 
 ...s/visionBridge |   98.81 |    92.12 |     100 |   98.81 |                   
  ...capability.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...part-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-bridge.ts |   98.72 |    82.35 |     100 |   98.72 | 65,71             
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ge-service.ts |   98.61 |     94.7 |     100 |   98.61 | ...06,666,679-680 
 src/skills        |   89.77 |    86.05 |   94.73 |   89.77 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...activation.ts |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 93,112            
  skill-curator.ts |   89.71 |    81.54 |     100 |   89.71 | ...01-902,904-907 
  skill-load.ts    |   94.84 |    87.69 |     100 |   94.84 | ...03,223,235-237 
  skill-manager.ts |   86.09 |    85.64 |   86.11 |   86.09 | ...1243,1250-1254 
  skill-paths.ts   |   90.42 |     87.5 |     100 |   90.42 | ...19-120,125-126 
  symlinkScope.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |   97.91 |    98.07 |     100 |   97.91 | 277-278           
 ...ataviz/scripts |   80.06 |    95.23 |   88.23 |   80.06 |                   
  ...te_palette.js |   80.06 |    95.23 |   88.23 |   80.06 | 261-296,306-328   
 ...s/bundled/loop |   97.48 |    95.77 |     100 |   97.48 |                   
  ...omous-loop.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-task-file.ts |   94.85 |     92.4 |     100 |   94.85 | ...56,367,375-376 
  ...k-resolver.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/subagents     |   88.56 |    89.42 |    98.3 |   88.56 |                   
  ...ter-schema.ts |     100 |    98.07 |     100 |     100 | 99                
  ...tin-agents.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nt-manager.ts |   85.51 |    86.52 |   97.43 |   85.51 | ...1582,1659-1660 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  validation.ts    |   92.46 |    95.18 |     100 |   92.46 | 47-52,63-68,71-76 
 src/telemetry     |   82.54 |    84.84 |   85.71 |   82.54 |                   
  ...ty-tracker.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-metrics.ts |   99.08 |    80.95 |     100 |   99.08 | 185,199           
  ...on-tracing.ts |   80.71 |    81.91 |   79.16 |   80.71 | ...92,499-501,517 
  ...attributes.ts |   96.98 |    91.37 |     100 |   96.98 | ...47-348,366-367 
  ...ag-metrics.ts |     100 |    77.77 |     100 |     100 | 21,40             
  ...t-loop-lag.ts |   96.85 |    85.71 |     100 |   96.85 | 170-173           
  ...-exporters.ts |   65.38 |    83.33 |      50 |   65.38 | ...08-109,112-113 
  ...ai-content.ts |    74.5 |    66.41 |   91.66 |    74.5 | ...1480,1493-1502 
  ...i-provider.ts |     100 |       99 |     100 |     100 | 99                
  ...ai-request.ts |   87.52 |    92.79 |   83.78 |   87.52 | ...55-561,564-570 
  gen-ai-usage.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t.circular.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-111             
  ...-processor.ts |   99.12 |    96.03 |      95 |   99.12 | 150,379-380       
  ...t.circular.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-128             
  loggers.ts       |   60.73 |    78.01 |   66.66 |   60.73 | ...1507,1524-1544 
  metrics.ts       |   80.37 |    82.35 |   80.95 |   80.37 | ...1150,1153-1164 
  otlp-urls.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...attributes.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ime-config.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  sanitize.ts      |      80 |    83.33 |     100 |      80 | 35-36,41-42       
  ...rters-grpc.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rters-http.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sdk-impl.ts      |   93.95 |    86.44 |      75 |   93.95 | ...41,483-484,500 
  sdk.ts           |    82.7 |     90.9 |   66.66 |    82.7 | ...00-204,242-264 
  ...on-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-events.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-tracing.ts |   91.17 |    88.72 |    97.5 |   91.17 | ...1920,1949-1952 
  ...etry-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...l-decision.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  trace-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-id-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tracer.ts        |   98.56 |    88.63 |     100 |   98.56 | 52,101            
  types.ts         |   83.26 |     95.8 |   86.36 |   83.26 | ...1467,1471-1478 
  uiTelemetry.ts   |   97.18 |    93.93 |      88 |   97.18 | ...70,314,461-462 
 ...ry/qwen-logger |   74.23 |    80.35 |      70 |   74.23 |                   
  event-types.ts   |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  qwen-logger.ts   |   74.23 |    80.18 |   69.49 |   74.23 | ...1122,1160-1161 
 src/test-utils    |   96.38 |    98.64 |   84.09 |   96.38 |                   
  config.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...st-helpers.ts |   94.11 |       90 |     100 |   94.11 | 69-70             
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...mised-lock.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mock-tool.ts     |   94.85 |      100 |      80 |   94.85 | ...53,227-228,241 
  ...aceContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/tools         |   86.23 |    85.09 |   89.54 |   86.23 |                   
  ...erQuestion.ts |   89.71 |    81.13 |    92.3 |   89.71 | ...66-367,374-375 
  ...-registrar.ts |    77.7 |    66.66 |   66.66 |    77.7 | ...72-277,292-294 
  ...ub-session.ts |   89.72 |    91.48 |   83.33 |   89.72 | ...00-301,312-319 
  cron-create.ts   |   90.64 |     93.1 |      75 |   90.64 | ...,73-74,223-231 
  cron-delete.ts   |   97.56 |      100 |   85.71 |   97.56 | 31-32             
  cron-list.ts     |   98.23 |    95.45 |   88.88 |   98.23 | 57-58             
  diffOptions.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  display-image.ts |   87.42 |    85.71 |    90.9 |   87.42 | ...29-134,194-195 
  edit.ts          |   82.76 |    86.88 |   82.35 |   82.76 | ...45-746,865-915 
  ...r-worktree.ts |   83.14 |    68.42 |   88.88 |   83.14 | ...84-187,278-279 
  enterPlanMode.ts |      85 |       84 |      90 |      85 | ...28-133,161-175 
  exit-worktree.ts |   83.29 |     83.8 |   94.73 |   83.29 | ...14-515,537-538 
  exitPlanMode.ts  |      95 |    85.29 |     100 |      95 | ...21-325,344,378 
  ...permission.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  glob.ts          |   96.33 |     88.5 |     100 |   96.33 | ...24-225,373,376 
  grep.ts          |   90.73 |    86.71 |   86.36 |   90.73 | ...76-677,727-728 
  ...adTracking.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  image-gen.ts     |   91.66 |    78.12 |   91.66 |   91.66 | ...13-214,221-222 
  list-agents.ts   |   94.11 |    83.33 |   85.71 |   94.11 | 31-32,47-48       
  loop-wakeup.ts   |   99.27 |     93.1 |     100 |   99.27 | 45                
  ls.ts            |   96.74 |    90.54 |     100 |   96.74 | 176-181,212,216   
  lsp.ts           |   72.71 |     59.9 |    90.9 |   72.71 | ...1212,1214-1215 
  ...nt-manager.ts |   82.13 |    80.47 |   85.71 |   82.13 | ...3234,3236-3237 
  mcp-client.ts    |   80.03 |    86.58 |   89.47 |   80.03 | ...2272,2276-2279 
  ...ry-timeout.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcp-errors.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...pool-entry.ts |   79.21 |    85.71 |   81.57 |   79.21 | ...1341,1349-1350 
  ...ool-events.ts |       8 |        0 |       0 |       8 | 132-158           
  mcp-pool-key.ts  |   97.46 |    93.93 |     100 |   97.46 | 176-177           
  ...ce-content.ts |   96.55 |    91.17 |     100 |   96.55 | 80-82             
  mcp-retry.ts     |   97.67 |    95.65 |     100 |   97.67 | 131-132           
  ...ion-config.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcp-status.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcp-tool.ts      |   98.35 |    93.75 |     100 |   98.35 | ...-990,1045-1046 
  ...sport-pool.ts |   83.98 |     80.3 |   88.46 |   83.98 | ...1409,1416-1420 
  ...ace-budget.ts |   87.27 |     82.6 |     100 |   87.27 | ...00-305,340-345 
  memory-config.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...iable-tool.ts |     100 |    84.61 |     100 |     100 | 101,108           
  monitor.ts       |   91.82 |    83.09 |   88.46 |   91.82 | ...99,612,810-815 
  notebook-edit.ts |   85.71 |    77.39 |   82.35 |   85.71 | ...96-912,958-959 
  ...escendants.ts |   36.17 |    64.51 |   55.55 |   36.17 | ...46-310,385-390 
  ...nforcement.ts |   83.21 |    90.69 |     100 |   83.21 | 147-158,207-220   
  read-file.ts     |   95.49 |    88.61 |    87.5 |   95.49 | ...49,464,536-537 
  ...p-resource.ts |   96.85 |      100 |   91.66 |   96.85 | 92-96             
  ...d-artifact.ts |   85.68 |    81.59 |   94.73 |   85.68 | ...1071,1095-1096 
  ripGrep.ts       |    94.6 |    87.34 |   95.45 |    94.6 | ...33-734,740-741 
  ...-transport.ts |   71.42 |    55.55 |   71.42 |   71.42 | ...36-137,143-144 
  send-message.ts  |   81.13 |       90 |   66.66 |   81.13 | ...80-286,363-371 
  ...n-mcp-view.ts |   94.07 |    91.89 |    90.9 |   94.07 | 131-139           
  shell.ts         |   78.96 |    84.29 |      93 |   78.96 | ...5036,5111-5112 
  skill-utils.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  skill.ts         |   91.39 |    92.55 |      90 |   91.39 | ...84,488,534-556 
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...eticOutput.ts |   95.12 |      100 |      80 |   95.12 | 87-88             
  task-create.ts   |    94.4 |    93.75 |   83.33 |    94.4 | 45-49,63-64,95    
  task-list.ts     |   80.43 |    86.95 |   85.71 |   80.43 | ...67,121,125-132 
  task-stop.ts     |   93.14 |    96.29 |    87.5 |   93.14 | 39-40,54-64       
  task-update.ts   |   82.87 |     86.5 |   92.85 |   82.87 | ...54-564,588-599 
  team-create.ts   |   97.22 |    86.36 |   85.71 |   97.22 | 48-49,129-130     
  team-delete.ts   |   86.74 |    84.61 |   85.71 |   86.74 | 37-38,42-48,72-73 
  ...n-approval.ts |   92.14 |    96.96 |   81.81 |   92.14 | 38-39,42-43,93-99 
  todoWrite.ts     |   95.13 |    87.85 |   93.33 |   95.13 | ...23-527,540-545 
  tool-error.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tool-names.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tool-registry.ts |   80.03 |    80.92 |   85.41 |   80.03 | ...89-990,998-999 
  tool-search.ts   |   96.19 |    89.79 |   93.75 |   96.19 | ...09,259-264,426 
  tools.ts         |   93.11 |    92.75 |    92.3 |   93.11 | ...77-578,594-600 
  ...reapproved.ts |   99.27 |    94.11 |     100 |   99.27 | 170               
  web-fetch.ts     |   96.05 |    90.54 |   96.77 |   96.05 | ...85-786,800-801 
  web-search.ts    |   90.58 |    83.57 |      80 |   90.58 | ...1025,1083-1086 
  write-file.ts    |   87.06 |    85.71 |   89.47 |   87.06 | ...29-832,869-904 
  zoom-image.ts    |   95.76 |    93.93 |    90.9 |   95.76 | 54-59,203-204     
 src/tools/agent   |   87.04 |    87.77 |   89.38 |   87.04 |                   
  agent.ts         |   85.64 |    86.73 |   87.09 |   85.64 | ...4295,4329-4339 
  fork-profile.ts  |   93.65 |       90 |     100 |   93.65 | ...33-134,171-174 
  fork-subagent.ts |   98.73 |       95 |     100 |   98.73 | 101-102,173       
 ...tools/artifact |   95.78 |    92.51 |   88.63 |   95.78 |                   
  artifact-tool.ts |   91.46 |    88.46 |   71.42 |   91.46 | ...13-314,322-325 
  ...-publisher.ts |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 32                
  ...-publisher.ts |   96.74 |    97.72 |    87.5 |   96.74 | 29-30,156-157     
  html.ts          |     100 |    96.77 |     100 |     100 | 122               
  ...-publisher.ts |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 30                
  oss-publisher.ts |    98.1 |    91.48 |     100 |    98.1 | 43-45             
  publisher.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...s/computer-use |   90.21 |     82.3 |   78.66 |   90.21 |                   
  bootstrap.ts     |   59.42 |    80.95 |   41.66 |   59.42 | ...35-339,341-345 
  client.ts        |   80.11 |       90 |   77.77 |   80.11 | ...97,242-243,274 
  constants.ts     |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 129,256           
  downloader.ts    |   65.29 |    52.77 |   58.33 |   65.29 | ...99-300,316-355 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  install-state.ts |   94.44 |    72.72 |     100 |   94.44 | 44-45             
  ...n-detector.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 50                
  schemas.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tool.ts          |    96.3 |    86.11 |     100 |    96.3 | 75-76,184,252-258 
 ...tools/workflow |    86.9 |    85.36 |   78.94 |    86.9 |                   
  workflow.ts      |    86.9 |    85.36 |   78.94 |    86.9 | ...06,551,553-554 
 src/utils         |   93.07 |     89.8 |    96.8 |   93.07 |                   
  LruCache.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Controller.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ssageQueue.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...cFileWrite.ts |      95 |     92.7 |     100 |      95 | ...49-550,657-661 
  bareMode.ts      |   81.81 |      100 |      50 |   81.81 | 18-19             
  ...ry-content.ts |   98.45 |    95.45 |     100 |   98.45 | 132-133,159-160   
  browser.ts       |   86.84 |    78.94 |     100 |   86.84 | 34,36-37,65-66    
  btwUtils.ts      |   13.95 |      100 |       0 |   13.95 | 17-31,34-55       
  bundlePaths.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...igResolver.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...engthError.ts |   91.06 |    89.47 |     100 |   91.06 | ...46-147,154-155 
  ...n-branches.ts |   95.89 |    94.11 |      95 |   95.89 | ...99-500,512-525 
  ...tion-chain.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cronDisplay.ts   |     100 |    97.61 |     100 |     100 | 46                
  cronParser.ts    |   95.34 |    93.33 |     100 |   95.34 | 41-42,47-48,70-71 
  debugLogger.ts   |   96.66 |    96.61 |   88.88 |   96.66 | 192-196           
  editHelper.ts    |   93.63 |     83.9 |     100 |   93.63 | ...27-428,462-463 
  editor.ts        |   97.65 |    95.45 |     100 |   97.65 | ...35-336,338-339 
  encoding.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  env.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...arResolver.ts |   94.28 |    88.88 |     100 |   94.28 | 28-29,125-126     
  ...entContext.ts |   96.63 |    90.13 |   96.66 |   96.63 | ...42,444-445,512 
  errorParsing.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rReporting.ts |   95.65 |    93.33 |     100 |   95.65 | 37-38             
  errors.ts        |   88.92 |    93.08 |      68 |   88.92 | ...92,394,410-411 
  fetch.ts         |   90.68 |    82.63 |     100 |   90.68 | ...72,483-484,503 
  file-identity.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  fileUtils.ts     |   95.05 |    92.71 |   96.15 |   95.05 | ...1988,1996-1997 
  forkedAgent.ts   |   92.98 |    83.78 |   94.44 |   92.98 | ...77,685,690-697 
  formatters.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...eUtilities.ts |    92.4 |    86.95 |     100 |    92.4 | ...52-158,168-169 
  ...rStructure.ts |   94.39 |    94.28 |     100 |   94.39 | ...29-132,343-348 
  getPty.ts        |   31.57 |       50 |     100 |   31.57 | 26-38             
  git-branches.ts  |    91.6 |    84.21 |    92.3 |    91.6 | ...90,405-410,570 
  ...fig-safety.ts |   97.01 |       80 |     100 |   97.01 | 53-54             
  git-ignore.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  gitDiff.ts       |   95.19 |    81.36 |     100 |   95.19 | ...1073,1419-1420 
  gitDirect.ts     |   98.84 |    94.28 |     100 |   98.84 | 234,318           
  ...noreParser.ts |   94.48 |    93.22 |     100 |   94.48 | ...23-124,158-159 
  gitUtils.ts      |   78.83 |    82.35 |    87.5 |   78.83 | ...22-123,164-215 
  github-prs.ts    |   95.74 |    82.27 |     100 |   95.74 | 216,314-322       
  iconvHelper.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rePatterns.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  image-view.ts    |   95.08 |    93.47 |     100 |   95.08 | ...62-166,234-238 
  ...ionManager.ts |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 27                
  ...lPromptIds.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  jsonl-utils.ts   |   96.15 |    93.51 |     100 |   96.15 | ...86-387,429-432 
  ...-detection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...iconv-lite.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...simple-git.ts |   96.77 |    91.66 |     100 |   96.77 | 38                
  ...m-headless.ts |      96 |    88.88 |     100 |      96 | 34                
  ...iagnostics.ts |    96.4 |     94.2 |     100 |    96.4 | ...66,293-294,376 
  ...yDiscovery.ts |   93.42 |    90.72 |     100 |   93.42 | ...11,370,592-595 
  ...tProcessor.ts |   94.01 |    89.88 |     100 |   94.01 | ...47-353,445-446 
  ...Inspectors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  modelId.ts       |   98.96 |    98.18 |     100 |   98.96 | 154               
  ...kerChecker.ts |    90.9 |    91.66 |     100 |    90.9 | 73-79             
  notebook.ts      |   94.57 |    89.91 |   95.83 |   94.57 | ...21,333,385-387 
  openaiLogger.ts  |   91.66 |    89.74 |     100 |   91.66 | ...26-228,251-256 
  osc8.ts          |   54.26 |    64.86 |   83.33 |   54.26 | ...72-195,197-257 
  partUtils.ts     |     100 |    98.64 |     100 |     100 | 211               
  pathReader.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  paths.ts         |   90.88 |    90.66 |     100 |   90.88 | ...28-629,631-633 
  pdf.ts           |   92.17 |    85.81 |     100 |   92.17 | ...64-565,606-611 
  ...s-liveness.ts |     100 |    93.47 |     100 |     100 | 62,72,108         
  projectPath.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  projectRoot.ts   |   71.73 |    78.57 |     100 |   71.73 | 54-66             
  ...ectSummary.ts |   89.62 |    72.41 |     100 |   89.62 | ...40-145,196-199 
  ...tIdContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  proxyUtils.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rDetection.ts |   71.15 |       86 |     100 |   71.15 | ...-90,96-101,147 
  ...noreParser.ts |   92.63 |    91.66 |     100 |   92.63 | ...77-178,197-198 
  rateLimit.ts     |   93.75 |    89.62 |     100 |   93.75 | ...13,218-219,262 
  ...text-range.ts |   96.98 |    87.36 |     100 |   96.98 | ...87-688,763-764 
  readManyFiles.ts |   95.75 |    80.86 |     100 |   95.75 | ...05,558,568-572 
  retry.ts         |   96.09 |    92.52 |     100 |   96.09 | ...72,563-564,582 
  retryContext.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sification.ts |   97.63 |    97.08 |     100 |   97.63 | ...17,251-252,278 
  retryPolicy.ts   |   97.72 |    90.56 |     100 |   97.72 | 130-131           
  ripgrepUtils.ts  |   90.04 |    93.43 |   95.45 |   90.04 | ...55-565,598-599 
  ...sDiscovery.ts |   97.46 |    93.05 |     100 |   97.46 | ...04,182-183,202 
  ...iagnostics.ts |   83.08 |     67.5 |   92.59 |   83.08 | ...23,543-544,550 
  ...tchOptions.ts |   84.87 |    86.71 |   96.29 |   84.87 | ...71,696,725-734 
  ...odelPrefix.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  runtimeStatus.ts |   97.77 |    91.48 |     100 |   97.77 | 172-173           
  safe-mode.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  safeJsonParse.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nStringify.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-child-env.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...aConverter.ts |   98.03 |    97.75 |     100 |   98.03 | 100,102-103       
  ...aValidator.ts |   92.09 |    83.65 |   90.47 |   92.09 | ...60,882-883,896 
  ...r-launcher.ts |   96.35 |    93.97 |   85.71 |   96.35 | ...35-336,347-348 
  sedEditParser.ts |   91.78 |    92.18 |     100 |   91.78 | ...66-569,645-646 
  ...nIdContext.ts |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 95                
  ...orageUtils.ts |   96.21 |    85.34 |     100 |   96.21 | ...70,386,466,485 
  ...-pager-env.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...fety-rules.ts |     100 |     89.7 |     100 |     100 | ...01,304,309-311 
  shell-utils.ts   |   86.26 |    88.58 |     100 |   86.26 | ...2295,2302-2306 
  ...lAstParser.ts |    98.3 |    91.59 |     100 |    98.3 | ...1340-1342,1352 
  ...ContextEnv.ts |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 76,111            
  ...nlyChecker.ts |   96.33 |    96.57 |     100 |   96.33 | ...83-284,292-293 
  sideQuery.ts     |   86.82 |    86.66 |     100 |   86.82 | ...79-185,187-193 
  ...pEventSink.ts |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 61                
  ...tGenerator.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ameContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  symlink.ts       |   77.77 |       50 |     100 |   77.77 | 44,54-59          
  ...e-encoding.ts |   85.96 |    76.47 |     100 |   85.96 | 58-61,64-65,78-79 
  ...emEncoding.ts |   96.36 |    91.17 |     100 |   96.36 | 59-60,124-125     
  terminalSafe.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Serializer.ts |   98.72 |       90 |     100 |   98.72 | 42-43,134,201-203 
  testUtils.ts     |   53.33 |      100 |   33.33 |   53.33 | ...53,59-64,70-72 
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  textUtils.ts     |      65 |      100 |      75 |      65 | 56-75             
  thoughtUtils.ts  |     100 |    95.65 |     100 |     100 | 99                
  ...-converter.ts |   95.23 |    85.71 |     100 |   95.23 | 36-37             
  ...repeat-key.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...name-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-finalizer.ts |    98.1 |     92.3 |   93.33 |    98.1 | ...34-235,237-241 
  ...iagnostics.ts |   99.06 |     97.7 |   91.66 |   99.06 | 133-134,205       
  ...-retention.ts |     100 |    95.83 |     100 |     100 | 116               
  tool-utils.ts    |    95.2 |    93.61 |     100 |    95.2 | ...58-159,162-163 
  ...ultCleanup.ts |   54.62 |    57.14 |      75 |   54.62 | ...03-105,108-134 
  ...Compaction.ts |   96.13 |    96.39 |     100 |   96.13 | ...34-339,341-346 
  ...pt-records.ts |   87.61 |    86.23 |     100 |   87.61 | ...80-484,514-529 
  truncation.ts    |   90.61 |    90.35 |     100 |   90.61 | ...53-461,498-504 
  windowsPath.ts   |   89.47 |    79.31 |     100 |   89.47 | ...57-58,62,90-91 
  ...-directory.ts |    83.7 |    80.95 |    87.5 |    83.7 | ...37-238,252-253 
  ...ifact-path.ts |   94.11 |    92.85 |     100 |   94.11 | 32-33             
  ...aceContext.ts |   95.39 |    89.47 |     100 |   95.39 | ...16-317,321-322 
  xml.ts           |    97.8 |    87.69 |     100 |    97.8 | 98-99             
  yaml-parser.ts   |   83.87 |    77.27 |     100 |   83.87 | ...31-234,239-240 
 ...ils/filesearch |   83.94 |    80.75 |   94.78 |   83.94 |                   
  crawlCache.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  crawler.ts       |    82.9 |    76.81 |   95.08 |    82.9 | ...1563,1597-1598 
  fileSearch.ts    |   93.78 |    87.67 |     100 |   93.78 | ...71-272,274-275 
  fzfWorker.ts     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-109             
  ...rkerHandle.ts |   84.05 |    75.86 |      90 |   84.05 | ...30-334,340-341 
  ignore.ts        |     100 |    97.36 |     100 |     100 | 187               
  result-cache.ts  |     100 |    93.75 |     100 |     100 | 49                
 ...uest-tokenizer |   71.04 |    75.92 |   91.17 |   71.04 |                   
  ...eTokenizer.ts |   65.72 |    74.02 |    92.3 |   65.72 | ...65-466,479-533 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tTokenizer.ts |   68.39 |    69.49 |    90.9 |   68.39 | ...24-325,327-328 
  ...ageFormats.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  textTokenizer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------

For detailed HTML reports, please see the 'coverage-reports-22.x-ubuntu-latest' artifact from the main CI run.

qwen-code-ci-bot

LGTM, looks ready to ship — CI landed green after the review. ✅

wenshao · 2026-08-20T04:07:25Z

@qwen-code /takeover

qwen-code-dev-bot · 2026-08-20T04:07:43Z

🤝 Takeover engaged: the autofix loop now manages this PR — it will address new review feedback and resolve base conflicts until the label is removed or the round cap is reached. Remove the autofix/takeover label (or comment @qwen-code /takeover stop) to release.

中文说明

🤝 已接管：autofix 循环现在管理此 PR —— 将持续处理新的评审反馈与 base 冲突，直到移除标签或达到轮次上限。移除 autofix/takeover 标签（或评论 @qwen-code /takeover stop）即可释放。

qwen-code-dev-bot · 2026-08-20T04:57:54Z

✅ AutoFix round 8 finished — view run. See this round's report below.

中文说明

✅ AutoFix 第 8 轮已完成 —— 查看运行。本轮报告见下方。

…t, gated on floor engagement (#9526) Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com>

qwen-code-dev-bot · 2026-08-20T05:50:15Z

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 1/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 1/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Round 1 — address-review for PR #9526

Commit: 1d293d8b25 (additive; no conflict, --conflict false). Batch: the 2 Criticals plus 6 Suggestions (8 findings — the round bound), with the 2 remaining Suggestions explicitly deferred to the next round below. Both Critical claims were reproduced against the pre-round code with failing tests before any fix, and both tests were confirmed to fail there and pass after the fix.

Critical

[Critical] R1-1 (rc:3818437096) — RESOLVED. Reproduced first: a handler-level probe with a deterministic [build] body Critical (event stays REQUEST_CHANGES) and a Critical-carrying prev-ledger returned event: REQUEST_CHANGES with no convergence field, no advisory in the body, and no terminal CONVERGENCE: line — all three surfaces silent, exactly as reported. Fix mirrors the COMMENT wiring: ...convergenceBlock joins the REQUEST_CHANGES parts (after the deferral display, same clause order as COMMENT) and ...(convergence ? { convergence } : {}) joins the REQUEST_CHANGES return object; the same spread joins the APPROVE return so the every-event JSON contract is uniform (the assessment cannot fire on APPROVE — it needs a standing Critical, which is REQUEST_CHANGES by construction — so no body block is wired there). The new firing test keeps the event REQUEST_CHANGES via a pre-confirmed [build] body Critical and asserts all three surfaces; it fails on the pre-round branch and passes with the fix.
[Critical] R1-2 (rc:3818437099) — RESOLVED. Reproduced first: round 2 under auto, carried Critical + standing Critical, flat 2/2 volume → the advisory fired and published "The severity floor will not converge it" before the floor had ever run. Fix follows the finding's two options together: the engagement predicate is extracted into severityFloorEngaged and shared by floorEnforcedReroute and the new call site (one statement, no drift), and a floorEngaged fact is added to ConvergenceFacts and required by the conjunction (!== true suppresses — degrades open like every other conjunct). One deliberate semantic choice to flag: the gate keys on the same predicate over the same RAW input the enforcement backstop uses — an absent/unknown floor never enforces, so the floor-futility claim is unprovable there too and the signal degrades open to silence. Consequence: the two round-7 e2e fixtures (which carried no floor and relied on the old floor-blind firing) now pass an explicit severityFloor: 'auto' — what the production recorded-floor recovery supplies — and the pre-engagement test uses a KNOWN auto floor so the silence is pinned on the engagement arm, not floor absence. New coverage: a handler test proving silence at round 2 under a known auto floor (fails pre-round, passes after), plus unit arms for floorEngaged: false and undefined.

Suggestions addressed

R1-8 (rc:3818437105) — RESOLVED. The new REQUEST_CHANGES firing test is exactly this case: the only standing Critical arrives via bodyCriticals with criticalsInline = 0, and the advisory must surface on all three surfaces. Under the criticalsInline-only mutant, thisCriticals drops to 0 there and the test fails.
R1-4 (rc:3818437102) — RESOLVED (minimal option). The prevLedgerFacts docstring now states the true contract: a missing or corrupt work-list degrades the signal open to silence, and that is the whole guarantee — recovery adopts another account's marker findings by design (recoverLedger), so a hostile marker within the recovery headroom can spoof the persistence and volume halves; the firing conjuncts that stay unforgeable are this round's own standing Critical and the floor's engagement. Why not the degrade-open-on-foreign behavior change: foreign recovery is the NORMAL cross-account case recoverLedger exists for (CI bot ↔ maintainer), and silencing the signal there would switch the advisory off in the common flow to guard an advisory-only, self-disclaiming recommendation that still requires one genuine standing Critical this round.
R1-5 (rc:3818437116) — RESOLVED. 'convergence' joins the PersistedVerdict Omit list with the sibling's documented rationale (the validator neither carries nor shape-checks it; the advisory rides the persisted body).
R1-6 (rc:3818437125) — RESOLVED. thisCriticals doc now names all three components (inline, body-only, and relocated), as suggested.
R1-7 (rc:3818437118) — RESOLVED. The suggested wording is applied in convergence.ts (both false and undefined suppress via !== true; production only ever yields true | undefined), and the twin overclaim in prevLedgerFacts is corrected in the same pass.
R1-10 (rc:3818437129) — RESOLVED. New unit test renders a rising-volume assessment (posted 5 / prevPosted 3) and pins anchored substrings in both languages — en this round 5, previous 3, zh 本轮 5 / 上一轮 3; the posted/prevPosted swap mutant now fails.

Deferred to the next round (recorded, not dropped)

R1-3 (rc:3818437115) — the round's ~8-finding bound filled with the Criticals first; reply posted on the thread.
R1-9 (rc:3818437108) — deferred together with R1-3: the overflow test's assertions are written against the notice wording R1-3's distinct-rank disclosure rewrites, so landing them together avoids writing the fixture twice; reply posted on the thread.

No conflicts to resolve (--conflict false; no merge performed). Diff stays well inside this window's 400/400 source/test budgets (5 files, +279/−26).

Verification

Commands actually run this round (repo root unless noted):

npm run build — passed
npm run typecheck — passed (all packages)
npm run lint — passed (no findings)
npx vitest run src/commands/review/ (from packages/cli) — 90 files, 3914 passed | 4 skipped
Focused vitest (from packages/cli): src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts, src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts, src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts — 443 passed | 1 skipped
npx prettier --check on the five touched files — passed (one file reformatted first)
Pre-round gate probe: with source files restored to pre-round HEAD, the two new Critical-resolving handler tests FAIL (expected undefined to match object… and expected [] to have a length of 1 but got +0); with the fix restored they pass — so the round's fix is proven load-bearing
Integration tests: not run — no integration test exercises compose-review (verified by search); the changed behavior is exercised through the real command handler by the vitest suites above, not a bundle-only path

中文说明

第 1 轮 — PR #9526 的 address-review

提交：1d293d8b25（增量提交；无冲突，--conflict false）。本批处理：2 条 Critical 加 6 条 Suggestion（共 8 条发现——本轮上限），其余 2 条 Suggestion 已在下方明确延后到下一轮。两条 Critical 的论断都在修复前先用失败测试在当前代码上复现，并确认这些测试在修复前失败、修复后通过。

Critical

[Critical] R1-1 (rc:3818437096) — 已解决。 先复现：handler 级探针使用确定性 [build] body Critical（事件保持 REQUEST_CHANGES）加携带 Critical 的 prev-ledger，返回 event: REQUEST_CHANGES 但没有 convergence 字段、正文无建议文本、终端无 CONVERGENCE: 行——三个面全部静默，与报告完全一致。修复镜像 COMMENT 接线：...convergenceBlock 加入 REQUEST_CHANGES 的 parts（位于延后清单之后，与 COMMENT 的子句顺序一致），...(convergence ? { convergence } : {}) 加入 REQUEST_CHANGES 返回对象；同样的展开也加入 APPROVE 返回，使 every-event 的 JSON 契约保持一致（评估不可能在 APPROVE 上触发——触发需要本轮存在 standing Critical，而这按构造就是 REQUEST_CHANGES——因此 APPROVE 不接正文块）。新增的触发测试通过预确认的 [build] body Critical 使事件保持 REQUEST_CHANGES 并断言三个面；该测试在修复前分支上失败、修复后通过。
[Critical] R1-2 (rc:3818437099) — 已解决。 先复现：auto floor 第 2 轮，上轮携带 Critical + 本轮 standing Critical、音量持平 2/2 → 建议触发，并在 floor 从未运行之前就发布 "The severity floor will not converge it"。修复同时采用该发现给出的两个方案：把生效谓词抽出为 severityFloorEngaged，由 floorEnforcedReroute 与新调用点共享（一处表述，不会漂移）；并给 ConvergenceFacts 增加 floorEngaged 事实，作为合取项必需（!== true 即抑制——与其他合取项一样 degrade open）。有一处需要说明的语义选择：门控使用与执行兜底相同的谓词、相同的原始输入——缺失/未知 floor 从不执行，因此 floor 无效论在那里同样不可证明，信号 degrade open 为静默。其结果：两个第 7 轮 e2e fixture（原本未携带 floor、依赖旧的 floor-blind 触发）现在显式传入 severityFloor: 'auto'——即生产环境 recorded-floor recovery 会提供的值——pre-engagement 测试也使用已知的 auto floor，使静默钉在生效分支上，而不是 floor 缺失上。新增覆盖：一个 handler 测试证明已知 auto floor 第 2 轮静默（修复前失败、修复后通过），以及 floorEngaged: false 与 undefined 的单测分支。

已处理的 Suggestion

R1-8 (rc:3818437105) — 已解决。 新增的 REQUEST_CHANGES 触发测试正是该用例：唯一 standing Critical 经 bodyCriticals 到达、criticalsInline = 0，且建议必须在三个面上出现。在 criticalsInline-only 变异下，该处 thisCriticals 降为 0，测试失败。
R1-4 (rc:3818437102) — 已解决（最小方案）。 prevLedgerFacts 的 docstring 改为陈述真实契约：工作清单缺失或损坏会使信号 degrade open 为静默，且这就是全部保证——恢复逻辑按设计采纳其他账号的 marker findings（见 recoverLedger），因此恢复 headroom 内的恶意标记可以伪造持续性半与音量半；不可伪造的触发合取项是本轮自身的 standing Critical 与 floor 的生效。为何不采用对外部来源 degrade open 的行为变更：外部恢复正是 recoverLedger 为之存在的常态跨账号场景（CI bot ↔ maintainer），在那里静默信号会让建议在该常见流程中整体失效，而它只是建议性、自我免责、且仍要求本轮存在一个真实 standing Critical 的推荐。
R1-5 (rc:3818437116) — 已解决。 'convergence' 加入 PersistedVerdict 的 Omit 列表，并按兄弟字段的文档说明理由（validator 既不携带也不做形状校验；建议文本已随持久化的 body 保留）。
R1-6 (rc:3818437125) — 已解决。 thisCriticals 文档现列出全部三个组成部分（inline、body-only、relocated），与建议一致。
R1-7 (rc:3818437118) — 已解决。 建议的措辞已应用于 convergence.ts（false 与 undefined 都经 !== true 抑制；生产只会产生 true | undefined）；prevLedgerFacts 中的孪生过度声称也在同一处修正。
R1-10 (rc:3818437129) — 已解决。 新增单测用升音量评估（posted 5 / prevPosted 3）渲染并在两种语言中钉住锚定子串——en this round 5, previous 3，zh 本轮 5 / 上一轮 3；posted/prevPosted 互换变异现在会失败。

延后到下一轮（已记录，不丢弃）

R1-3 (rc:3818437115) — 本轮约 8 条发现的上限已被 Critical 优先占满；已在该线索回复。
R1-9 (rc:3818437108) — 与 R1-3 一并延后：该溢出测试的断言所针对的提示文案正是 R1-3 的独立 rank 披露要改写的内容，一起落地可避免 fixture 写两遍；已在该线索回复。

无冲突需要解决（--conflict false；未执行合并）。diff 仍在本窗口 400/400 源码/测试预算之内（5 个文件，+279/−26）。

验证

本轮实际运行的命令（未注明者均在仓库根目录）：

npm run build — 通过
npm run typecheck — 通过（全部包）
npm run lint — 通过（无发现）
npx vitest run src/commands/review/（在 packages/cli 下）— 90 个文件，3914 通过 | 4 跳过
聚焦 vitest（在 packages/cli 下）：src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts、src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts、src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts — 443 通过 | 1 跳过
npx prettier --check 检查五个改动文件 — 通过（其中一个文件先做了格式化）
修复前门控探针：把源文件恢复到本轮前的 HEAD 后，两条新的解决 Critical 的 handler 测试失败（expected undefined to match object… 与 expected [] to have a length of 1 but got +0）；恢复修复后通过——证明本轮修复是承重的
集成测试：未运行——经检索确认没有任何集成测试覆盖 compose-review；被改动的行为由上述 vitest 套件通过真实命令 handler 覆盖，并非仅经 bundle 的路径

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

qwen-code-ci-bot

Reviewed. Suggestions are inline.

Not explored to full depth (tool budget reached): "agent 1a": run the new vitest suites ( packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts , the four new tests in compose-review.test.ts ) — neither the worktree no…; "agent 5": running the new tests to confirm they pass — the review worktree has no node_modules and a full npm ci + build exceeds this review's tool/time budget; all cov….

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 2, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:1690 — [probe] Gate-produced Criticals are invisible to both halves of the persistently-critical conjunction (advisory-only blast radius; deferred by the code-age rule — anchored on lines u…
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:4487 — [probe] Terminal line prints "CONVERGENCE: Convergence: …" — the label twice (deferred by the code-age rule — anchored on lines unchanged since the round-1 head)
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:4487 — [probe] Multi-line CONVERGENCE record: prefix on line 1 only, self-disclaimer on the last physical line (deferred by the code-age rule — anchored on lines unchanged since the round-1…

中文说明

已审查。建议见行内评论。

未探索到全部深度（达到工具调用预算）："agent 1a"：run the new vitest suites ( packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts , the four new tests in compose-review.test.ts ) — neither the worktree no…；"agent 5"：running the new tests to confirm they pass — the review worktree has no node_modules and a full npm ci + build exceeds this review's tool/time budget; all cov…。

收敛姿态下延后（第 2 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 3 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

… rank (#9526) The advisory shared trim rank 1 with the deferral display, but every rank-1 disclosure surface names "the deferred-findings list" — a fired zero-deferral round whose body overflowed posted a trim notice asserting a deferral list that never existed while the dropped advisory went unnamed. The advisory now holds its own rank (and RANK_NAMES entry), yielding after the deferral display and before the not-reviewed disclosures. Adds the overflow fixture that pins the yield and the relocated-arm firing fixture that pins the third thisCriticals term, and corrects the prevLedgerFacts threat docstring: under `auto` the floor-engagement conjunct is forgeable via the carried round, so the only unforgeable conjunct is this round's own standing Critical.

qwen-code-dev-bot · 2026-08-20T09:17:47Z

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 2/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 2/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Autofix review-feedback round — PR #9526

All four inline findings from the round-2 automated review are addressed; all
four are resolved in code in one commit
(fix(review): give the trimmed convergence advisory its own disclosure rank).
The three items the reviewer explicitly deferred ("recorded, not requested in
this round") are left untouched. No conflict resolution was needed
(--conflict false).

Dispositions

[rc:3819546879] R1-3 — the advisory shares trim rank 1 with the deferral
display, and every rank-1 disclosure surface is hard-keyed to "the
deferred-findings list" → RESOLVED. Reproduced first: the new overflow
fixture, run against the pre-fix tree, fails exactly on the false-record
shape the finding describes — the posted trim notice reads "the
deferred-findings list did not fit … and deferred findings in this run's
findings artifact" while the actually-dropped section is the advisory and no
deferral list ever existed. Fix: the advisory gets its OWN trim rank with its
own RANK_NAMES entry instead of sharing rank 1. Yield order is now: the
deferral display (rank 1) → the convergence advisory (rank 2) → the
not-reviewed and non-blocking disclosures (rank 3, moved from 2). The rank-1
surfaces keep their exact deferral-only semantics: the findings-artifact
pointer still rides only when rank 1 dropped, bodyTrim.deferralList still
means "the deferral list dropped", and the verdict line's where clause is
unchanged. The stderr remediation line is made truthful for the advisory too
— its tail no longer claims "their only other copy" when the advisory is
among the dropped ranks (the composed JSON also carries it). All
rank-referencing comments (source and tests) are updated to the new numbers.

[rc:3819546883] R1-8 — the relocated-Criticals term of thisCriticals is
pinned by nothing → RESOLVED. Added a handler-level firing fixture (like
the other four) where the round's only Critical arrives via the relocated
arm: a deferredSuggestions entry with severity Critical and deterministic
test source, previous ledger carrying sev C at flat volume. It asserts
the fired assessment on the composed JSON (criticals: 1, posted: 0,
prevPosted: 0), REQUEST_CHANGES, the relocated blocker in the body, and the
terminal CONVERGENCE line. Mutant check recorded: deleting
+ relocatedCriticals.length from the sum makes this test fail
(convergence becomes undefined), so the term is now pinned in a firing
context.

[rc:3819546889] R1-9 — the advisory's body-budget yield (trim rank, rung 2)
is untested → RESOLVED. Landed together with the R1-3 fix, as planned in
round 1: the overflow fixture IS the R1-3 fixture — an overflowing,
zero-deferral fired round where the advisory is the only trimmable section.
It asserts the trim notice names the actually-dropped section by its own
name, the (1 section(s)) count, "Nothing blocking was trimmed.", the
ABSENCE of the deferral-list name and the artifact pointer in both the body
and the stderr remediation, the exact bodyTrim flags
({sections: 1, deferralList: false, fold: false, truncated: false}), that
the not-reviewed disclosures survive (the advisory yields before them — the
two ranks are distinct and in this order), and that the operator's
remediation line names the loss. Verified failing on the pre-fix tree and
passing after the fix.

[rc:3819546896] the docstring claims floor engagement is unforgeable →
RESOLVED (docstring corrected); the finding's OPTIONAL behavioral change is
DECLINED. The claim was verified against the real functions first — probe
output (forged attacker-account round-5 marker with a sev-C finding vs an
own round-1 marker):

recovered.foreign: true
recovered.round: 5
recovered.findings: [{"id":"R5-1","sev":"C","file":"x.ts","title":"forged blocker"}]
severityFloorEngaged(auto, false, recovered.round): true
control severityFloorEngaged(auto, false, 1): false
control severityFloorEngaged(critical, false, 1): true

So under the default auto floor a forged foreign marker within the recovery
headroom wins the carried round, merges its findings into the work-list, and
engages the floor (prevRound + 1 >= 6) — the engagement conjunct is
forgeable, and the only conjunct no foreign marker can touch is this round's
own standing Critical. The prevLedgerFacts threat docstring is rewritten to
say exactly that: all three spoofable halves named (persistence, volume, and
engagement under auto), the one unforgeable conjunct named (an explicit
critical floor is likewise operator-set, not ledger-carried), and the
targeted abuse named with its bounded impact (advisory-only, self-disclaiming,
still requires one genuine own standing Critical, moves no event, and the
land decision stays with a maintainer). The optional restriction of the
persistence/volume halves to own-account markers is declined: recovery adopts
foreign markers by design for multi-account loops (the recoverLedger docs
record own-account-only shutting the feature off where it was designed to
work), the abuse's blast radius is bounded to a self-disclaiming advisory by
the finding's own analysis, and changing recovery semantics is a posture
decision beyond this PR's minimal scope.

Changed files

packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts — the advisory's own
trim rank and RANK_NAMES entry; disclosures moved to rank 3; truthful
remediation tail; corrected threat docstring; rank comments updated.
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts — the overflow
fixture (R1-3 + R1-9), the relocated-arm firing fixture (R1-8), and
rank-number comment updates in the existing overflow tests.

Verification

npm run build — passed (exit 0)
npm run typecheck — passed (exit 0)
npm run lint — passed (exit 0, no errors or warnings)
npx prettier --check on both changed files — passed
npx vitest run src/commands/review/ (packages/cli, focused on the touched
area) — 90 test files, 3830 passed | 4 skipped, 0 failed
Reproduce-first checks: the new overflow test FAILS on the pre-fix tree
(the R1-3 false record) and passes after the fix; the relocated-term
mutant (thisCriticals without + relocatedCriticals.length) makes the
new R1-8 test fail; the forged-marker probe above reproduces the
docstring's wrong claim through the real recoverLedger +
severityFloorEngaged.
No integration/bundle run: the touched behavior (body-budget ranks and the
convergence assessment's inputs) is fully exercised by the unit-level
composeReview and handler tests above, not by the bundled CLI or the
integration harness.

中文说明

Autofix 评审反馈轮次 — PR #9526

第 2 轮自动评审的 4 条行内发现全部已处理，且全部在一个提交中于代码层面解决
（fix(review): give the trimmed convergence advisory its own disclosure rank）。
评审方明确延后的 3 条（"已记录，本轮不要求修改"）保持原样未动。无需解决冲突
（--conflict false）。

各项处置

[rc:3819546879] R1-3 — 建议块与延后清单共享 trim rank 1，而所有 rank-1
披露面都硬编码为"延后发现清单" → 已解决。先复现：把新增的溢出 fixture 在修复前
的代码树上运行，恰好按发现描述的假记录形态失败——发布的裁剪说明写着"延后发现清单
未能放入……延后发现另见本次运行的 findings 工件"，而实际被裁掉的段落是建议块，且根本
不存在任何延后清单。修复：给建议块单独的 trim rank 与独立的 RANK_NAMES 条目，不再
共享 rank 1。让位顺序现为：延后清单展示（rank 1）→ 收敛建议（rank 2）→ 未审查范围与
非阻断披露（rank 3，由 2 迁移而来）。rank-1 各披露面保持其精确的"仅限延后清单"语义：
findings 工件指针仍然只在 rank 1 被裁时才附上，bodyTrim.deferralList 仍表示"延后清单
被裁"，verdict line 的 where 分句不变。stderr 补救行对建议块也改为如实表述——当被裁
rank 中包含建议块时，结尾不再声称"它们是仅有的另一份副本"（composed JSON 同样携带它）。
所有引用 rank 编号的注释（源码与测试）均已按新编号更新。

[rc:3819546883] R1-8 — thisCriticals 中的 relocated Critical 项没有任何测试钉住
→ 已解决。新增一个 handler 级触发 fixture（与既有四个同形态）：本轮唯一的 Critical
经 relocated 分支到达——一条 severity 为 Critical、source 为确定性 test 的
deferredSuggestions 条目，上一轮台账携带 sev C 且音量持平。断言 composed JSON 上
评估触发（criticals: 1、posted: 0、prevPosted: 0）、事件为 REQUEST_CHANGES、
正文含 relocated 阻断项、终端含 CONVERGENCE 行。突变体验证已记录：从求和中删除
+ relocatedCriticals.length 后该测试失败（convergence 变为 undefined），该求和项
从此在触发场景下被钉住。

[rc:3819546889] R1-9 — 建议块在正文预算下的让位行为（trim rank、rung 2）无测试
→ 已解决。按第 1 轮的计划与 R1-3 修复一起落地：溢出 fixture 就是 R1-3 的 fixture——
一个溢出、零延后的触发轮次，建议块是唯一的可裁剪段落。断言裁剪说明以建议块自己的名字
点名实际被裁的段落、(1 section(s)) 计数、"Nothing blocking was trimmed."、正文与
stderr 补救行中均不出现延后清单名称与工件指针、精确的 bodyTrim 标志
（{sections: 1, deferralList: false, fold: false, truncated: false}）、未审查披露
仍然保留（建议块先于它们让位——两个 rank 彼此独立且顺序如此）、以及操作者的补救行点名
了该损失。已验证：修复前代码树上失败，修复后通过。

[rc:3819546896] docstring 声称 floor 生效不可伪造 → 已解决（更正 docstring）；
该发现中的可选行为变更被婉拒。先经真实函数验证该论断——探针输出（伪造的
attacker-account round-5 marker，含一条 sev-C 发现，对比自身 round-1 marker）：

recovered.foreign: true
recovered.round: 5
recovered.findings: [{"id":"R5-1","sev":"C","file":"x.ts","title":"forged blocker"}]
severityFloorEngaged(auto, false, recovered.round): true
control severityFloorEngaged(auto, false, 1): false
control severityFloorEngaged(critical, false, 1): true

即默认 auto floor 下，恢复头room内的伪造外来 marker 会赢得携带的轮次、其发现会并入
工作清单、并使 floor 生效（prevRound + 1 >= 6）——生效合取项可伪造，唯一不受外来
marker 影响的合取项是本轮自身未决的 Critical。prevLedgerFacts 的威胁 docstring 已
按事实重写：点名全部三个可伪造的半区（持久性、音量，以及 auto 下的生效性）、点名唯一
不可伪造的合取项（显式 critical floor 同样是操作者配置、不来自台账）、并点名该定向
滥用及其有界影响（仅建议、自我免责、仍要求一条真实的自身未决 Critical、不移动事件、
合入决定权在 maintainer）。可选项——把持久性/音量两半限制为仅读本账户 marker——被婉拒：
恢复层采纳外来 marker 是多账户循环的设计使然（recoverLedger 的文档记录了仅限本账户会
在该功能设计的场景下使其失效），按该发现自身的分析滥用的影响范围有界于一条自我免责的
建议，且变更恢复语义属于姿态决策，超出本 PR 的最小范围。

变更文件

packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts —— 建议块的独立 trim rank 与
RANK_NAMES 条目；披露块迁至 rank 3；如实的补救行结尾；更正后的威胁 docstring；
rank 相关注释更新。
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts —— 溢出 fixture
（R1-3 + R1-9）、relocated 分支触发 fixture（R1-8），以及既有溢出测试中 rank 编号
注释的更新。

验证

npm run build — 通过（exit 0）
npm run typecheck — 通过（exit 0）
npm run lint — 通过（exit 0，无 error/warning）
npx prettier --check（两个变更文件）— 通过
npx vitest run src/commands/review/（packages/cli，聚焦受影响范围）— 90 个测试文件，
3830 通过 | 4 跳过，0 失败
复现优先验证：新增溢出测试在修复前代码树上失败（R1-3 假记录形态），修复后通过；
relocated 项突变体（thisCriticals 去掉 + relocatedCriticals.length）使新增的
R1-8 测试失败；上述伪造 marker 探针经真实 recoverLedger + severityFloorEngaged
复现了 docstring 的错误论断。
未运行集成/bundle 测试：受影响行为（正文预算 rank 与收敛评估的输入）完全由上述
unit 级 composeReview 与 handler 测试覆盖，而非 bundled CLI 或集成测试框架。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

qwen-code-ci-bot

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 3, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:1696 — [probe] Advisory engagement arms (critical floor, contextUnavailable) have no advisory-side oracle
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:1370 — [probe] hadCritical reader has no negative oracle at the production boundary (sev-S-only work-list)
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:2806 — [probe] COMMENT-branch advisory fixture never asserts its event
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:2797 — [probe] Missing-volume fail-open arm unpinned at the production boundary
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.ts:159 — [review] Advisory text overclaims identity persistence of previous-round Criticals
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:2817 — [probe] No rising-volume firing fixture at the compose boundary
packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.ts:41 — [probe] convergence Omit exclusion has no test oracle
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:2800 — [probe] Post-floor-enforcement volume source unpinned at the handler boundary

中文说明

收敛姿态下延后（第 3 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 8 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

…e signal (#9526) The persistently-critical signal read `thisCriticals` before the gate pushed its Criticals into `bodyCriticals`, and the ledger work-list feeding the next round's persistence half omitted them too. A loop whose standing blocker is the deterministic [lint] gate — the exact shape the signal exists to name — held the whole conjunction semantically while the advisory stayed silent: the count was taken before the array was complete, and the gate-only round recorded no sev 'C' for its successor to recover. The assessment now runs after the relocated and gate pushes and reads the completed array with the same semantics as the verdict's own `c` (the explicit relocated term drops with the push that already carries it), and the gate's Criticals join the marker work-list. Adds the handler fixture arming the gate end to end — advisory fires, marker records sev 'C' — and pins both branches of the trim notice's copy-location conditional, which had no oracle on either side.

qwen-code-dev-bot · 2026-08-20T14:09:54Z

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 3/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 3/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Round summary — PR #9526

Both actionable inline findings are resolved in code (commit d72287cc6d). The review-level list of eight findings is explicitly deferred by the reviewer itself ("recorded, not requested in this round") and is not actionable this round.

Feedback points and dispositions

[rc:3821459235] [Critical] The persistently-critical signal is blind to the script-lint gate's Criticals on both conjuncts — RESOLVED.
- Reproduced first: a new handler fixture arms the script-lint gate (a worktree plan, a report bound to the plan diff's hash, one in-diff finding above style) with the model drafting nothing, a round-6 predecessor carrying sev C and volume 0, and the auto floor engaged at round 7. On the pre-fix code the round composes REQUEST_CHANGES over the gate's posted [lint] Critical, yet convergence is undefined and the marker's work-list records no sev C — exactly the silent shape the finding describes.
- Fix (root cause, both conjuncts):
  - The assessment is computed AFTER the relocated push and the gate push, reading bodyCriticals as mutated there — the same array, with the same semantics, that the verdict's own c counts. The explicit relocatedCriticals.length term is dropped because the push already carries those entries; keeping it would double-count.
  - The gate's Criticals join the buildLedger work-list input in ledgerMarkerFor, so a gate-only round records sev C and the next round's persistence half can see it.
- The new fixture pins the fired shape end to end: advisory on all three surfaces (composed JSON field, body disclosure, terminal CONVERGENCE line), criticals: 1, posted: 0, prevPosted: 0, event REQUEST_CHANGES, and a sev C entry in the marker's work-list.
[rc:3821459242] [Suggestion] Neither branch of the copy-location conditional has any oracle — RESOLVED.
- Verified the gap first: grep confirmed another copy / only other copy appeared in no test.
- Extended the names the trimmed advisory for itself test's remediation assertion to also require another copy — the advisory also rides the composed JSON, and asserted their only other copy in the rank-3-only trim fixture.
- Mutant-checked both oracles at this commit: deleting the conditional (always their only other copy) now fails the first oracle; inverting it (always the advisory clause) now fails the second. Both mutants previously survived with the full suite green.
[rv:4982582242] CHANGES_REQUESTED review listing eight findings "Deferred under the convergence posture (round 3, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round" — no action this round, per the review's own disposition; the reviewer recorded them and did not request them now.

Changes

packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:
- composeReviewBody: moved the convergenceAssessment call from right after splitDeferralChannel to after the gate block; thisCriticals now counts criticalsInline + bodyCriticals.length over the completed array (input + relocated + gate), the same set the verdict's c counts.
- ledgerMarkerFor: the work-list passed to buildLedger now also carries scriptLintGate(input.planPath).criticals — the same gate the body ran.
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:
- New handler fixture arming the script-lint gate end to end (advisory firing + marker work-list oracle).
- Two remediation-line oracles, one per branch of the trim notice's copy-location conditional.

Conflict notes

None — --conflict false; no merge performed.

Verification

Commands actually run this round (integration tests not run: the touched behavior is exercised through the real exported composeReview and the CLI handler in unit tests, not only through the bundled CLI; no settings source changed, so no schema regeneration):

npm run build — passed
npm run typecheck — passed
npm run lint — passed
npx prettier --check on both changed files — passed (after one formatting fix in the test file)
npx vitest run src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts (packages/cli) — 402 passed
npx vitest run over the adjacent marker/compose suites (submit.test.ts, save-artifact.test.ts, lib/ledger.test.ts, pr-context.test.ts, resolve-anchors.test.ts, recover-findings.test.ts) — 359 passed, 1 skipped
Reproduction evidence: the new gate fixture FAILED on the pre-fix code (expected undefined to match object { shape: 'persistently-critical', ... } while the event was REQUEST_CHANGES) and passes after the fix
Mutant probes on the copy-location conditional: the delete-conditional mutant is caught by the advisory oracle, the invert-conditional mutant by the rank-3-only oracle; source restored after probing

中文说明

本轮总结 — PR #9526

两条可操作的行内发现均已在代码中解决（提交 d72287cc6d）。评审级别列出的八条发现由评审者自身明确延后（"收敛姿态下延后（第 3 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改"），本轮不作为操作项。

反馈点与处置

[rc:3821459235] [Critical] persistently-critical 信号在两个合取项上都对 script-lint 门禁的 Critical 不可见 — 已解决。
- 先复现：新增的 handler fixture 启用 script-lint 门禁（worktree plan、绑定到 plan diff 哈希的报告、一条位于 diff 内且高于 style 级别的发现），模型不起草任何评论，上一轮（第 6 轮）台账携带 sev C 且音量为 0，auto floor 在第 7 轮生效。修复前的代码中，该轮就门禁发布的 [lint] Critical 合成出 REQUEST_CHANGES，但 convergence 为 undefined，且 marker 的工作清单不记录任何 sev C——正是该发现所描述的静默形态。
- 修复（根因，覆盖两个合取项）：
  - 评估改在 relocated 推入与门禁推入之后计算，按就地修改后的 bodyCriticals 读取——与判定自身统计 c 所用的是同一个数组、同一语义。显式的 relocatedCriticals.length 项被移除，因为推入操作已携带这些条目，保留会造成重复计数。
  - 门禁的 Critical 加入 ledgerMarkerFor 中 buildLedger 的工作清单输入，使仅有门禁的轮次也记录 sev C，下一轮的持久性半部因此可见。
- 新 fixture 端到端钉住触发形态：建议出现在全部三个面（composed JSON 字段、正文披露、终端 CONVERGENCE 行），criticals: 1, posted: 0, prevPosted: 0，事件为 REQUEST_CHANGES，marker 工作清单携带一条 sev C 条目。
[rc:3821459242] [Suggestion] 副本位置条件语句的两个分支均无 oracle — 已解决。
- 先核实缺口：grep 确认 another copy / only other copy 未出现在任何测试中。
- 将 names the trimmed advisory for itself 测试的补救行断言扩展为同时要求 another copy — the advisory also rides the composed JSON，并在仅 rank-3 裁剪的 fixture 中断言 their only other copy。
- 在本提交上做了突变体验证：删除条件（恒取 their only other copy）现在会被第一个 oracle 捕获；反转条件（恒取建议子句）现在会被第二个 oracle 捕获。两个突变体此前在全套测试全绿的情况下均能存活。
[rv:4982582242] CHANGES_REQUESTED 评审列出八条"收敛姿态下延后（第 3 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改"的发现 — 依评审自身的处置，本轮不操作；评审者已记录这些条目且本轮未要求修改。

变更内容

packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts：
- composeReviewBody：将 convergenceAssessment 调用从紧随 splitDeferralChannel 之后移至门禁代码块之后；thisCriticals 现在按补全后的数组（输入 + relocated + 门禁）统计 criticalsInline + bodyCriticals.length，与判定统计 c 的集合一致。
- ledgerMarkerFor：传给 buildLedger 的工作清单现在同样携带 scriptLintGate(input.planPath).criticals——与正文运行的是同一个门禁。
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts：
- 新增端到端启用 script-lint 门禁的 handler fixture（建议触发 + marker 工作清单 oracle）。
- 为裁剪通知副本位置条件语句的两个分支各补一条补救行 oracle。

冲突说明

无 —— --conflict false，未执行任何合并。

验证

本轮实际执行的命令（未运行集成测试：所触及的行为通过真实导出的 composeReview 与 CLI handler 在单元测试中即可覆盖，并非只能经捆绑后的 CLI 验证；未改动任何 settings 来源，故无需重新生成 schema）：

npm run build — 通过
npm run typecheck — 通过
npm run lint — 通过
对两个变更文件执行 npx prettier --check — 通过（测试文件先做了一处格式修正）
npx vitest run src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts（packages/cli）— 402 通过
对相邻的 marker/compose 测试套件（submit.test.ts、save-artifact.test.ts、lib/ledger.test.ts、pr-context.test.ts、resolve-anchors.test.ts、recover-findings.test.ts）执行 npx vitest run — 359 通过，1 跳过
复现证据：新的门禁 fixture 在修复前代码上失败（事件已为 REQUEST_CHANGES 而 convergence 为 undefined，断言 expected undefined to match object { shape: 'persistently-critical', ... }），修复后通过
对副本位置条件语句的突变体探针：删除条件突变体被建议 oracle 捕获，反转条件突变体被仅 rank-3 oracle 捕获；探针结束后源码已还原

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

qwen-code-ci-bot

Reviewed — no blockers. Suggestions are inline.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 4, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:2734 — [probe] noteTrimmedRanks tail clause misstates copy location when ranks 2+3 drop together
packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.ts:56 — [probe] Omit justification is false when the body budget trims the advisory — no durable copy survives
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:118 — [probe] zh Critical-count interpolation is clause-ambiguous and unpinned
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:2860 — [probe] shrinking-volume boundary pinned only at delta 2; delta-1 mutant ships green
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:2815 — [probe] thisCriticals wiring exercised only at value 1; constant mutant false-fires on the just-converged round
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:133 — [probe] zh residual-risk scaffold clause has no oracle

中文说明

已审查——无阻断问题。建议见行内评论。

收敛姿态下延后（第 4 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 6 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

qwen-code-dev-bot · 2026-08-20T18:20:28Z

🤖 Reviewed the latest feedback — no changes needed. Why, point by point: · 已审阅最新反馈——无需改动。逐点说明原因如下：

Autofix round: no action required

Critical-only mode is active for this counting window: the growth brake engaged on the test-line budget (net source 108 / test 506 lines vs budgets of 400/400; 0 prior rounds were over budget). After the deterministic filter, this round's actionable sections contain no work:

Reviews: none newer than the last evaluation.
Inline comments: none.
Issue-level comments: none.
Failed checks: none — all reported CI checks completed as success or intentionally skipped.
Still-red checks: none.

The two items listed under Deferred non-Critical feedback (an automated-reviewer review, and inline finding rc:3823623365 on packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:1522) were excluded from the actionable set by the brake. Under the critical-only rules they are an audit record, not work for this round: no code changes, no thread resolutions, and no comment replies were made for them. They remain open for human follow-up.

Result: no code changes and no commit this round; the branch stays at its current head.

中文说明

Autofix 轮次：无需处理

本计数窗口已启用仅处理 Critical 模式：增长刹车由测试行数预算触发（净增长源码 108 / 测试 506 行，预算为 400/400；此前没有轮次超出预算）。经过确定性过滤后，本轮可执行区域中没有任何待处理工作：

评审（Reviews）： 自上次评估以来没有新的评审。
行内评论（Inline comments）： 无。
Issue 级评论（Issue-level comments）： 无。
失败的检查（Failed checks）： 无 —— 所有报告的 CI 检查均为成功或有意跳过。
持续失败的检查（Still-red checks）： 无。

延迟的非 Critical 反馈中列出的两个条目（一次自动评审器的评审，以及位于 packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:1522 的行内发现 rc:3823623365）被刹车从可执行集合中排除。按照仅处理 Critical 的规则，它们属于审计记录，不是本轮的工作内容：未对它们做任何代码修改、未解决任何讨论串、也未撰写任何评论回复。这些条目保持开放，留待人工跟进。

结果：本轮不做任何代码改动，也不产生任何提交；分支保持在当前 head。

Deferred non-Critical feedback

Critical-only mode is active: the PR's diff grew src 108 / test 506 net lines beyond this counting window's baseline (budgets: 400/400). The workflow excluded the non-Critical feedback below from this round's actionable sections; the items remain open for human follow-up. Maintainer feedback continues to flow unaffected during a growth-only engagement (the per-author batch budget applies only after 5 change-producing rounds). (@qwen-code /retry starts a fresh counting window.)

Review by @qwen-code-ci-bot: feat(review): add the persistently-critical convergence advisory (land-with-residual-risk) #9526 (review)
Inline rc:3823623365 packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:1522: feat(review): add the persistently-critical convergence advisory (land-with-residual-risk) #9526 (comment)

中文说明

已进入仅处理 Critical 的模式：本计数窗口内 diff 净增长已达源码 108 / 测试 506 行（预算 400/400）。本轮可执行区域已排除下方非 Critical 反馈；这些条目保持开放，留待人工跟进。纯增长触发期间维护者反馈照常流动（按作者的批次预算仅在完成 5 个产生改动的轮次后生效）。（评论 @qwen-code /retry 可开启新的计数窗口。）

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

wenshao · 2026-08-20T22:52:49Z

@qwen-code /triage

qwen-code-ci-bot · 2026-08-20T22:53:28Z

Sandboxed verification: ✅ passed — merge-ready (agent verdict) - workflow run

Ran the PR in an isolated, token-free container: A/B against the base build, mock-free harness assertions, targeted gates. Advisory evidence for human reviewers — not a review, an approval, or a CI check.

Scripted assertions: 4129 passed · 0 failed · 4129 total

Flakiness gate: ✅ 2 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

中文 — 判定：✅ 通过 · 可合入（agent 判定）

沙箱验证在隔离、无凭证的容器中执行了该 PR 的代码（与 base 构建 A/B 对照、无 mock harness 断言、定向门禁）。仅作为评审证据，不构成评审、批准或 CI 检查。

脚本断言：4129 通过 · 0 失败 · 4129 总计

抖动门：✅ 2 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

Verification report

PR #9526 Deep Verification — persistently-critical convergence advisory

Verdict: merge-ready — 4129/4129 scripted assertions passed, 0 unexpected failures.
Verified head: d72287cc6d106d885985ba4e7d50a16e7b673edc (git rev-parse HEAD^2), merged over base tip 027772d2ab6fdbeab17b8f0d0e6b5210603955b5 (HEAD^1).

Assertion accounting: 4071 review-dir vitest tests at head (92 files; 4 pre-existing skips not counted) + 50 mock-free A/B harness assertions + 6 mutation-matrix assertions + 2 gates (typecheck, ESLint on touched files). Raw logs in logs/, harnesses in harness/.

中文摘要

结论：merge-ready —— 4129/4129 脚本化断言通过，无意外失败。

A/B 结论（见「Central claim」表及 01-ab-head-vs-base.png）：用真实 compose 命令（无 mock、真实文件系统、真实 stdio）驱动 7 个场景 × head/base 两臂。persistently-critical 形态在 head 的三个面（JSON convergence 字段、正文披露、终端 CONVERGENCE: 记录）全部披露，base 完全静默；收缩音量、floor 未生效、上轮无 Critical 等降级臂全部静默，且静默时 head 输出与 base 逐字节一致。事件（event）在所有 cell 上两臂一致 —— advisory 从不移动事件。
feat(review): add the persistently-critical convergence advisory (land-with-residual-risk) #9526 尾提交修复得证：gate-only 轮（唯一 Critical 来自确定性 [lint] 门）在 head 触发建议且台账工作清单记录 sev 'C'；base 两者皆无。链式下一轮：head 标记之后 head 再次触发；base 标记之后 head 静默 —— 直接证明工作清单半修复是载荷项。
突变矩阵（5 个突变全部被预期断言杀死，无幸存者）：计数位置前移、标记清单去掉门 Critical、建议共用 trim rank 1、持久半读取器失效、零 Critical 守卫删除 —— 每一个都使且仅使预期测试变红。
Findings：仅 1 条 Suggestion —— save-artifact 路径对「携带 convergence 字段的 composed JSON 被接受且字段被剥离」无测试钉住（代码经白名单校验器逐字段构造，行为已核实正确，属覆盖缺口而非缺陷）。另对 PR 正文的测试计数做了更正（见 Corrections）。
未覆盖：逐提交归属（shallow depth 2，本地仅可达聚合 diff）；pr-context 从真实 GitHub 评论回收标记的上游链路（本验证复刻的是 wire shape，非触发源）；仓库级测试门（仅跑了受影响目录）。

Central claim + A/B

Central claim: when the carried telemetry proves the loop is stuck on Criticals (previous round's work-list held a Critical AND this round stands behind one AND the severity floor is engaged AND the two-round posting window is present and not shrinking), the real compose command surfaces the land-with-residual-risk advisory on three surfaces — composed-JSON convergence field, body disclosure, terminal CONVERGENCE: record — and is advisory-only: it never moves the event, never caps, never blocks; when the shape is not provable the output is byte-identical to base.

Secondary claims: (1) the final commit's fix — the script-lint gate's Criticals count in the signal and join the marker work-list, so a gate-only loop fires and its successor recovers the persistence half; (2) the advisory holds its own trim rank (2), yielding after the deferral display (1) and before the not-reviewed disclosures (3), with the trim notice naming it correctly.

Harness: harness/ab-harness.mjs drives the REAL composeReviewCommand.handler (via tsx, identical runner both arms) against on-disk carried-ledger fixtures; head tree = merge checkout, base tree = HEAD^1 worktree wired to the already-installed root node_modules. Control cleanliness asserted: readlink -f tmp/base-tree/node_modules/@qwen-code/qwen-code-core resolves into the head tree, and git diff HEAD^1..HEAD -- packages/core packages/cli/package.json package-lock.json is empty, so the reused dependency tree and internal links carry no part of the change under test. Witness: evidence/01-ab-head-vs-base.png.

cell	fixture (carried ledger ← this round)	head oracle	base oracle	result
`fire-inline`	round 6, sev C, posted 1 ← 1 inline Critical	JSON field `{criticals:1,posted:1,prevPosted:1}` + 1 CONVERGENCE record with `land-with-residual-risk` + "does not block" + body carries code	no field, no record, no advisory	head 3/3 surfaces fire; base silent; event COMMENT on both arms (unverified inline Critical softens identically — advisory moved nothing)
`shrink`	round 6, sev C, posted 3 ← 1 inline Critical	silent	silent	stdout+stderr byte-identical across arms (after normalizing each arm's own cell path in the coverage disclosure)
`gate-only` (#9526)	round 6, sev C, posted 0 ← model drafts nothing; armed script-lint report is the only Critical	fires `{criticals:1,posted:0,prevPosted:0}`, event REQUEST_CHANGES, marker records sev 'C'	silent; marker work-list has no sev 'C'	head fires on all surfaces; base blind on both halves
`gate-next-from-head`	side file rebuilt from head's gate-only marker ← same gate-only round	fires again (persistence half recovered)	—	fired
`gate-next-from-base`	side file rebuilt from base's gate-only marker ← same gate-only round	silent (base marker carried no sev C)	—	silent — the fix's load-bearing proof across rounds
`pre-floor`	round 1, sev C, posted 2 ← 1 Critical + 1 Suggestion at `auto` round 2	silent; Suggestion still posts (volume 2 — floor not engaged)	silent	both silent, events agree
`clean-prev`	round 6, sev S only, posted 1 ← 1 Critical	silent	silent	both silent

50/50 assertions passed (ab-assertions.json); per-cell stdout/stderr in logs/. Fired gate-only body excerpt: Convergence: this loop is persistently critical — Criticals stood in the previous round's work-list and stand again this round (1 Critical(s)), and the posting volume is not shrinking (this round 0, previous 0)… over Verdict: Request changes.

One oracle note: the terminal CONVERGENCE: record is a single logical stderr record whose advisory embeds newlines (the residual-risk table) — the harness counts records by prefix occurrences, not physical lines.

Mutation matrix (no survivors; positive controls landed in the mutated files)

#	mutation (scratch, restored after)	suite that caught it	kill evidence
M1	`thisCriticals` counted from `modelBodyCriticals` (pre-gate-push array) — the exact pre-#9526 count	`compose-review.test.ts -t '#9526'`	red: `expected undefined to match object {shape, recommendation…}`; isolation control: the 6 `-t '#9410'` tests stayed green under the same mutant — only the gate channel is lost. Witness: `evidence/02-mutation-count-before-gate.png`
M2	deleted `...scriptLintGate(input.planPath).criticals` from the marker work-list	`-t '#9526'`	red: `expected false to be true` on `ledger.findings.some(f => f.sev === 'C')` — the advisory still fired, only the next round's persistence half broke
M3	advisory `trim: 2` → `trim: 1` (shares the deferral display's rank — pre-commit-4 state)	`-t 'trimmed advisory'` overflow fixture	red: notice no longer contains `the persistently-critical convergence advisory did not fit`
M4	`thisCriticals <= 0` guard → `< 0` (positive control in `convergence.ts`)	`convergence.test.ts`	exactly 1/12 red: `suppresses when this round posts no Critical` — `expected {Object (shape, recommendation…)} to be null`. Witness: `evidence/03-positive-control-zero-critical-guard.png`
M5	`prevLedgerFacts` sev reader `'C'` → `'X'` (persistence-half wiring)	`-t '#9410'` + `-t '#9526'`	all 5 firing tests red, both silence tests stay green — the right kill pattern

Unmutated control is green: 4071 passed / 4 skipped on the restored tree (identical to the pre-mutation run); tree verified byte-identical to HEAD after each restore (git status --porcelain empty).

Both branches of the trim notice's copy-location conditional are pinned by the PR's own tests, which ran green in the suite: the rank-3-only drop asserts their only other copy, and the fired-zero-deferral overflow asserts another copy — the advisory also rides the composed JSON.

Advisory-only audit

Production read sites of the assessment, by census: the body block (convergenceBlock, two render paths), the JSON-field spread (three return branches), and the handler's terminal record — nothing else. It is not an input to the event, the caps, or the posting decision; the A/B additionally proved head/base event agreement on every cell. save-artifact.ts excludes convergence at runtime, not just in types: validateVerdict constructs the persisted verdict field-by-field from an explicit whitelist and never reads the key (object() is non-strict, so a fired composed JSON still validates and the field is dropped). The forgeability posture documented on prevLedgerFacts was traced and matches the code: under auto, a carried foreign round number engages the floor predicate (severityFloorEngaged keys on the carried prevRound), while an explicit critical floor and this round's own standing Critical stay outside ledger control; the side file is pr-context's output, out of this PR's diff.

Corrections

Descriptions in the PR body that do not match the final head (corrections to the description, not requests to change code):

"nine tests pin the full firing conjunction" — lib/convergence.test.ts contains 12 tests (10 assessment + 2 advisory).
"-t '#9410' — two tests drive the real compose command" — the filter matches 6 tests (plus 1 for -t '#9526').
"Full regression … 3913 pass" — the review dir at head runs 4071 tests (92 files). The body's numbers appear to be from an earlier commit/base state; the "all pass" claim itself holds.

Findings

1. (Suggestion) The save-artifact acceptance path for a fired composed JSON is unpinned. save-artifact.test.ts has no test that a composed verdict carrying convergence validates and persists without the field. I verified the behavior by reading the validator (whitelist construction, non-strict object()) — it is correct — but the exclusion rests on code reading, not an assertion. A one-liner fixture feeding a fired composed JSON through validateVerdict/saveReviewArtifact would pin it. Not a defect; the unpinned path is not itself broken.

Not covered

Per-commit attribution. The checkout is depth 2 (git rev-parse --is-shallow-repository true); git rev-list HEAD^1..HEAD^2 reports 1 commit where the metadata snapshot lists 5 — the shallow boundary makes intermediate commits unreachable, so the aggregate HEAD^1..HEAD diff is what was verified, including the accumulated fixes from all five commits.
Upstream trigger chain. The harness reproduces the wire shape: carried-ledger side files exactly as pr-context writes them. The recovery of markers from real posted GitHub comments (and the forged-marker path discussed under the advisory audit) was traced in code, not driven end to end — no GitHub token exists in this sandbox by design.
Repo-wide gates. Only the affected surface ran: review-dir suite, npm run typecheck (repo-wide by construction), ESLint on the five touched files. Other workspaces' suites were not run (the diff touches nothing outside packages/cli/src/commands/review/).
Both arms drove TypeScript source via tsx (symmetric runner), not compiled dist/; the head's compiled dist/ was separately confirmed to contain the convergence wiring (3 assessment/CONVERGENCE refs, severityFloorEngaged, the marker's gate-criticals spread). A first attempt to compile the base tree's packages/cli standalone failed on project-reference rebuilds of unchanged sibling packages (missing generated files in the fresh worktree); the tsx route avoided rebuilding packages the PR does not touch.
Windows/Linux-specific behavior: N/A — the change is platform-free composition logic.

Methodology

Ran in the CI verify container (node:22-bookworm, Node v22.23.2) on the merge-ref checkout. Targeted gates ran first (vitest for lib/convergence.test.ts, filtered #9410/#9526 wiring tests, the full src/commands/review/ dir, repo npm run typecheck, ESLint on touched files). The A/B drove the real composeReviewCommand.handler from both trees through one shared run-cell.ts under tsx, each cell in its own temp dir with real plan/ledger/report files and a clean HOME, capturing real stdout/stderr; the base worktree at HEAD^1 reused the root node_modules (lockfile and packages/core untouched by the PR; realpath of the internal link quoted above). Mutants were applied one at a time to the working tree, run against the pinned tests with the failure message checked for the intended expected-versus-actual mismatch, then restored via git checkout with cleanliness verified. Evidence captures used scripts/verify-capture.mjs. Per-cell logs: logs/<arm>-<cell>.{stdout,stderr}.log; harness source: harness/ab-harness.mjs, harness/run-cell.ts.

Flakiness gate log


rounds=5 files=2 skipped=0
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts


per-file results (P=pass F=fail I=infra-exit, one letter per run):
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: PPPPP

verdict: pass
summary: 2 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

--- per-invocation detail (full copy in the artifact) ---
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)

Evidence images

Harness scripts and raw logs are in the workflow run artifacts (7-day retention).

— Qwen Code · sandboxed verification

qwen-code-ci-bot

LGTM, looks ready to ship. ✅

qwen-code-dev-bot · 2026-08-20T23:09:17Z

🤖 Reviewed the latest feedback — no changes needed. Why, point by point: · 已审阅最新反馈——无需改动。逐点说明原因如下：

Autofix review round: no action taken

This round ran in Critical-only mode because the diff-growth brake engaged: the PR grew by 108 source / 506 test net lines beyond this counting window's baseline (budgets: 400/400; 1 prior round was already over budget). In this mode only Critical findings, failed checks, and maintainer requests are actionable.

After triaging the workflow-prepared feedback, there was nothing actionable this round:

New reviews: none
Inline comments: none
Issue-level comments: none
Failed checks: none
Still-red checks (persisting): none

The single item listed under Deferred non-Critical feedback (a PR comment from the automated reviewer, issuecomment-5363033877) was excluded from the actionable set by the deterministic filter. Per the Critical-only rules it is an audit record, not work: it remains open for human follow-up and no code change, thread resolution, or comment reply was made for it.

No conflict resolution was requested (--conflict false), so origin/main was not merged.

Result: no commits were made; the PR head remains at d72287cc6d ("fix(review): count the script-lint gate's Criticals in the convergence signal (#9526)"). No verification commands were run because no code changed this round.

中文说明

Autofix 审查轮次：未采取任何操作

本轮运行于 仅处理 Critical 模式，原因是 diff 增长刹车被触发：本计数窗口内，PR 净增长已达源码 108 行 / 测试 506 行，超出基线（预算：400/400；此前已有 1 轮超出预算）。该模式下只有 Critical 级别的发现、失败的检查以及维护者的请求才是可处理的。

对工作流准备好的反馈进行分类后，本轮没有任何可处理的事项：

新的 review： 无
行内评论： 无
Issue 级评论： 无
失败的检查： 无
持续失败的检查： 无

Deferred non-Critical feedback（延迟的非 Critical 反馈）中列出的唯一条目（来自自动审查器的一条 PR 评论，issuecomment-5363033877）已被确定性过滤器从可处理集合中排除。按照仅处理 Critical 的规则，它只是一条审计记录，而非工作项：保持开放状态留待人工跟进，未针对它做任何代码修改、线程关闭或评论回复。

本轮也未请求解决冲突（--conflict false），因此未合并 origin/main。

结果： 未产生任何提交；PR 的 head 仍为 d72287cc6d（"fix(review): count the script-lint gate's Criticals in the convergence signal (#9526)"）。由于本轮没有代码变更，未运行任何验证命令。

Deferred non-Critical feedback

Critical-only mode is active: the PR's diff grew src 108 / test 506 net lines beyond this counting window's baseline (budgets: 400/400). The workflow excluded the non-Critical feedback below from this round's actionable sections; the items remain open for human follow-up. Maintainer feedback continues to flow unaffected during a growth-only engagement (the per-author batch budget applies only after 5 change-producing rounds). (@qwen-code /retry starts a fresh counting window.)

PR comment by @qwen-code-ci-bot: feat(review): add the persistently-critical convergence advisory (land-with-residual-risk) #9526 (comment)

中文说明

已进入仅处理 Critical 的模式：本计数窗口内 diff 净增长已达源码 108 / 测试 506 行（预算 400/400）。本轮可执行区域已排除下方非 Critical 反馈；这些条目保持开放，留待人工跟进。纯增长触发期间维护者反馈照常流动（按作者的批次预算仅在完成 5 个产生改动的轮次后生效）。（评论 @qwen-code /retry 可开启新的计数窗口。）

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

qwen-code-dev-bot · 2026-08-21T00:38:52Z

🤖 AutoFix deferred this item to a human under instruction (round 4/100) — the agent's handoff note below names the decision and the options. The loop stays engaged and still picks up new feedback and base conflicts, but will not retry this item on its own.

What I found before stopping:

Handoff — PR #9526 needs a maintainer's decision

Why I am stopping

The growth brake has engaged and the PR is not converging. In this counting
window the diff grew source +108 / test +506 net lines against budgets of
400/400, two prior rounds were already over budget, and the diff is still not
shrinking. The actionable review queue is empty — no open Critical/Required
findings, no failed checks — so the growth is driven by work already done, not
work still owed. Per the address-review contract I am applying no further code
fixes this round and deferring the landing decision to a maintainer.

What the PR is

PR #9526 (issue #9410) adds a persistently-critical convergence advisory to
the review command: when the severity floor is engaged and Critical findings
persist across rounds while posting volume does not shrink, it surfaces one
advisory recommending land-with-residual-risk. It is advisory-only — computed
from carried ledger facts, holding no authority, and every input degrades open.

Shape of the change: a new module
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.ts (167 lines) plus its
tests (141 lines), wired into compose-review.ts (+202/-30 source, +633/-9
tests), and a small save-artifact.ts change.

Why it is not converging — and a collision I found this round

Two reinforcing causes:

Test-driven growth. In this window the source growth (+108) is under
budget; the overage is entirely in tests (+506 vs 400). Each round's f

中文说明

🤖 AutoFix 已按指示将此项移交人工处理（第 4/100 轮）—— 下方 agent 的 handoff 说明列出了待决决策与各选项。循环保持在线，仍会拾取新反馈与 base 冲突，但不会自行重试此项。

Run log: https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code/actions/runs/32431061529

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

qwen-code-ci-bot

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

Not reviewed: reverse audit — did not converge within the reverse-audit round cap of 5.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 9, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1225 — [probe] describe('convergenceAssessment') closes one test early, stranding four conjunct tests
packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts:595 — [probe] bad-shape fixtures keep dead posted/prevPosted keys; negative-count case throws on missing fresh
packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.ts:65 — [review] JSDoc says convergence sheds before everything; the rank -1 health note sheds first
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:2935 — [probe] missing-fresh degrade-open arm has no e2e oracle; a ?? 0 mutant ships green
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:3117 — [probe] advisory floorEngaged wiring's contextUnavailable argument has no oracle
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.ts:899 — [review] module header still attributes the window to the posted/prevPosted pair after the fresh rename
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:3178 — [probe] prevHadCritical oracle fixture is confounded with the new prevPostedSuggestion conjunct
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:3722 — [review] fixture comment names a + relocatedCriticals.length term that does not exist in the sum
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.ts:911 — [review] prevHadCritical JSDoc misdescribes undefined — wiring folds recovered-zero-Critical into it
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.ts:1135 — [probe] advisory asserts identity ('stand again') but the conjuncts prove only presence
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:3323 — [review] posture fixture's narrative claims a Suggestion-posting predecessor its own data does not contain
packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.md:928 — [review] trim-order fix leaves line 1348's 'first section trimmed' claim contradicting it, test pin included

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

未审查：反向审计——在 5 轮的反审轮数上限内未收敛。

收敛姿态下延后（第 9 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 12 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

#9526) Correct, and reproduced through the real composer before changing anything. Recovery adopts the highest-round marker whoever posted it. Where that marker was NOT merged over this account's own findings, this account's entries are in no work list at all — the state `openCriticals` already refuses to infer across, one screen up in the same function. Every prev-round fact this signal reads comes off that list, and it read it unconditionally: pure-foreign {foreign:true, merged:false} -> FIRES own list {foreign:false} -> FIRES merged {foreign:true, merged:true} -> FIRES An own round-6 marker that was a clean LGTM (empty findings, fresh 0, floor stamped `c`), a foreign same-round marker carrying Criticals and no Suggestions winning recovery, and one Critical drafted this round were enough to publish "Criticals stood in the previous round's work-list and stand again this round — land-with-residual-risk" over this account's own LGTM. All three list-derived facts are withheld on that state, not just `prevHadCritical`: it alone silences the assessment today, but leaving the other two reading a stranger's list is a hole waiting for the next edit to re-open. `prevPostedSuggestion` in particular reads ABSENCE, and a stranger's Critical-only list is exactly the shape that reads as "the floor enforced". Merged foreign lists are deliberately NOT withheld: the union keeps this account's own certified entries under their own ids, which is the part that makes the list speak for this account again — the same distinction `openCriticals` draws. The test drives all three arms and asserts them as one table, so the fix is pinned in both directions: a mutant disabling the gate fires on the stranger, and a mutant widening it to any `foreign` marker silences the merged arm. Both turn the suite red, as does un-gating `prevHadCritical` alone. Not changed, and recorded rather than left implicit: a TRUNCATED work-list still reads as this account's. Truncation shortens our own list, which is a different thing from a stranger's, and the direction it errs in is already documented on `prevPostedSuggestion` and the backlog veto. Requiring completeness would silence the advisory on precisely the deep-work-list rounds it exists for. packages/cli: 4433 pass / 1 skipped. Typecheck, ESLint and Prettier clean.

doudouOUC

Reviewed diff-only — the PR’s existing discussion could not be fetched, so this is not an approval and not a no-blockers claim.

Not reviewed: coverage — could not read the agents' transcripts (no subagent transcripts at C:\Users\jinye.djy.qwen\projects\c--users-jinye-djy--qoderwork-workspace-mspqz3u5etjh72hs-qwen-code\subagents\fbe0140e-9ca7-4911-955e-885d58527a47 (ENOENT: no such file or directory, scandir 'C:\Users\jinye.djy.qwen\projects\c--users-jinye-djy--qoderwork-workspace-mspqz3u5etjh72hs-qwen-code\subagents\fbe0140e-9ca7-4911-955e-885d58527a47'). The harness writes one per agent; if there are none, either no agents ran or the harness could not write them.), so this run cannot show that any of the diff was read.

Not reviewed: verification — could not check that Step 4 and Step 5 ran (no subagent transcripts at C:\Users\jinye.djy.qwen\projects\c--users-jinye-djy--qoderwork-workspace-mspqz3u5etjh72hs-qwen-code\subagents\fbe0140e-9ca7-4911-955e-885d58527a47 (ENOENT: no such file or directory, scandir 'C:\Users\jinye.djy.qwen\projects\c--users-jinye-djy--qoderwork-workspace-mspqz3u5etjh72hs-qwen-code\subagents\fbe0140e-9ca7-4911-955e-885d58527a47'). The harness writes one per agent; if there are none, either no agents ran or the harness could not write them.).

— qwen-code-review via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.10)

qwen-code-ci-bot

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

Not reviewed: reverse audit — did not converge within the reverse-audit round cap of 5.

Not reviewed: build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 10, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:2944 — [review] thisCriticals re-derives the Critical count instead of reusing openCriticals/c
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:3781 — [probe] trim 2→3 renumbering of deferredBlock/testPlanBlock has no overflow oracle
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:2924 — [probe] truncation degrade-direction comment is false for two conjuncts; the truncated-predecessor arm is untested and ungated
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:8843 — [probe] #9526 overflow fixture actually drops [-1, 2, 3], never the pure [2, 3] shape it claims to pin
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1248 — [review] two tests pin production-unreachable fact combinations and name the opposite of production behavior
packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts:459 — [review] 'All four ranks' comment miscounts the five-rank ladder the test pins
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:2963 — [probe] 'Suggestion presence means the floor was not running' is falsified by the deterministic-tag exclusion

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

未审查：reverse audit — did not converge within the reverse-audit round cap of 5。

未审查：build-and-test — Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox) was skipped in CI and its suite did not run locally。

收敛姿态下延后（第 10 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 7 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

wenshao · 2026-08-22T12:02:53Z

@qwen-code /triage

qwen-code-ci-bot · 2026-08-22T12:03:29Z

Sandboxed verification: ✅ passed — merge-ready (agent verdict) - workflow run

Ran the PR in an isolated, token-free container: A/B against the base build, mock-free harness assertions, targeted gates. Advisory evidence for human reviewers — not a review, an approval, or a CI check.

Scripted assertions: 4579 passed · 0 failed · 4579 total

Flakiness gate: ✅ 4 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

中文 — 判定：✅ 通过 · 可合入（agent 判定）

沙箱验证在隔离、无凭证的容器中执行了该 PR 的代码（与 base 构建 A/B 对照、无 mock harness 断言、定向门禁）。仅作为评审证据，不构成评审、批准或 CI 检查。

脚本断言：4579 通过 · 0 失败 · 4579 总计

抖动门：✅ 4 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

Verification report

PR #9526 Deep Verification (follow-up round 3) — persistently-critical convergence advisory

Verdict: merge-ready — 4579/4579 scripted assertions passed, 0 unexpected failures.
Verified head: 4ced96c01282132dec1ea06e843ce58753e3c81b (git rev-parse HEAD^2, matches the metadata snapshot's headRefOid), merged over base tip 6bbb273a86c6e9087aeb98aa6c5a65bcbbc0fa47 (HEAD^1). The snapshot's baseRefOid (41884864…) predates the latest main merge; HEAD^1 is authoritative for this merge-ref checkout.

中文 — 判定：✅ 通过 · 可合入（agent 判定）

结论：merge-ready —— 4579/4579 脚本化断言全部通过，无意外失败。本轮为第三次跟进轮：上一轮验证的是 d8ab5d2b（round-5 oracle 修复）。此后分支新增五个 commit：round-6 延迟清单处理（bd857f02）、fresh 窗口重构（59f6489e：窗口从发布总量改为首次发现数 + 积压收缩否决 + 字段改名 fresh/prevFresh）、与 main 的合并（5aad08ce：#9623 健康说明、五级 trim 阶梯）、prevPostedSuggestion 执法证据（edfd5fa2：不再信任可伪造的 c 戳）、以及本次标题修复（4ced96c0：拒绝把纯外来工作清单当作本账号历史）。所有测量均在新 head 重跑。

上一轮发现状态（见下表）：F1（save-artifact 接收路径）保持已修复（字段改名后重新得证）；F2（floor 读法缺口）保持已修复并扩展为双向钉住；F3（可伪造性 docstring 丢失）依旧成立（仅文档漂移）。
A/B 结论（见「Central claim」表、01-ab-head-vs-base.png、04-persist-ab-same-input.png）：14 个 compose cell × head/base 两臂 + 6 个持久化 cell，90/90 断言。提交信息声称的五个新形状全部实测：fresh 下降的收敛循环静默（总量 5→6 上升、首次 5→4 下降，VOLUME 行为证）、积压清理静默、零 fresh 且积压持平触发、每轮新 Critical 触发、纯外来清单静默而合并外来与本账号清单照常触发；prevPostedSuggestion 与 prevFloor 两个守卫的静默/触发两侧均得证；观察与建议在同一轮并存（CONVERGENCE: 与 RESIDUAL-RISK: 各一行）；无触发形状输出与 base 逐字节一致；所有 cell 事件两臂一致（建议未移动事件）。
突变矩阵（02-mutation-matrix.png）：9/10 被钉死，且各自钉在预期测试上（五个新守卫 + 两个方向的收紧全部复现提交声称的 kill）；唯一幸存的 M8 是分层守卫探针，分类为冗余防御（见 Findings 2，非合入条件）。阳性对照分别落在两个被突变文件内。
Findings：1 条 Suggestion（F3 文档漂移依旧，行为一致）+ 1 条完备性说明（M8 分类）。无新行为缺陷。
未覆盖：逐提交归属（depth 2）；上游真实触发链（wire shape 复刻）；overflow/trim 由 vitest fixture + 对照突变 C2 钉住而非 A/B cell；review 目录与 SKILL 测试之外的仓库级套件门（typecheck 本身全仓）。

Previous-finding status

This is a follow-up round. The previous report verified head d8ab5d2b and returned merge-ready with one standing Suggestion. Since then five commits landed (bd857f02, 59f6489e, 5aad08ce merge, edfd5fa2, 4ced96c0); every measurement below was re-run at the new head — nothing carried forward by diffing the old report.

#	finding	severity	status at head `4ced96c0`
1	save-artifact acceptance path for a fired composed JSON unpinned	Suggestion	fixed (holds at the new head, re-measured through the field rename) — `59f6489e` renamed the persisted counts `posted`/`prevPosted` → `fresh`/`prevFresh`; the validator now shape-checks exactly that triple. Same-input A/B re-run: head persists all five fields intact (`04-persist-ab-same-input.png`), base's validator drops `residualRisk` from the identical input, four wrong shapes refused with field-named errors and nothing written. The carry test is alive: it goes red under control mutant C1.
2	strict-vs-reporting floor reading coverage gap	Suggestion	fixed and extended — `edfd5fa2` addresses the sibling half of the same defect (the predecessor's `c` stamp is the reporting fold): `prevPostedSuggestion` now supplies the enforcement evidence, and `prevFloor` guards the posture change. Mutants M4 (delete the Suggestion guard), M5 (delete the floor guard), M6 (tighten veto to unknown-suppresses), M7 (tighten floor guard to reject unrecorded) each turn the suite red exactly where the commits claim, in both directions.
3	forgeability docstring the branch added (commit `7389a10`) did not survive the merge	Suggestion	stands — still no advisory-surface comment carries the note; `forgeable`/`unforgeable` grep finds only the pre-existing model-identity note (`compose-review.ts:5087`). Behavior matches the missing note exactly (traced in Findings 1). One nuance new this round: `4ced96c0`'s pure-foreign refusal narrows the forgeable surface (a stranger's unmerged marker can no longer supply `prevHadCritical` at all), which makes the missing sentence worth slightly less but does not restore it.
—	PR body test counts stale	correction	stands, stale again at the new head — re-measured; see Corrections.

Central claim + A/B

Central claim (re-tested at the new head): when the carried telemetry proves the loop is stuck on Criticals — previous round's work-list held a Critical AND this round stands behind one AND the floor is engaged on both rounds (proven, not stamped) AND the two-round FRESH window is present and not shrinking AND the standing backlog is not observably shrinking — the real compose command surfaces land-with-residual-risk on three surfaces (composed-JSON residualRisk, body disclosure, terminal RESIDUAL-RISK: single line), advisory-only; when any conjunct is unproven the output is byte-identical to base. The round-3 delta adds five falsifiable sub-claims, each with its own cell: the fresh window (59f6489e), the backlog veto, the posture guard (bd857f02), the enforcement evidence (edfd5fa2), and the pure-foreign refusal (4ced96c0).

Delta attribution: the base tip (HEAD^1) already contains #9461's observation and #9623's mechanism-health half, and zero advisory symbols (grep: 0 residualRisk/RESIDUAL-RISK in base's compose-review.ts/convergence.ts; 0 residualRisk in base's save-artifact.ts, which does carry postedFresh ×7). Base-arm suite: 4394 passed | 4 skipped (4398) vs head's 4430 passed | 4 skipped (4434) — exactly +36 passing, +0 failing, the PR's whole test addition. Core's SKILL.test.ts passes 24/24 on BOTH arms (the PR moves the trim-order prose and its two assertions together). The 4 skips are environmental on both arms (3× no shellcheck binary in-container, 1× case-sensitive FS).

Harness: harness/ab-harness.mjs + one shared harness/run-cell.mts drive the REAL composeReviewCommand.handler / saveReviewArtifact from each tree via tsx (no vitest, no mocks), each cell in its own temp dir, GH_TOKEN empty. Base tree = HEAD^1 worktree wired to the head dependency tree. Control purity: the PR now touches packages/core (SKILL.md + SKILL.test.ts only — git diff HEAD^1..HEAD --stat); SKILL.md is a bundled data asset never loaded by the compose path, so the driven code path consumes no changed core code. Realpath asserted: readlink -f tmp/base-tree/node_modules/@qwen-code/qwen-code-core → /__w/qwen-code/qwen-code/packages/core (head), and the cli-suite arm is unaffected because cli's vitest aliases core to each tree's OWN source. Witness: evidence/01-ab-head-vs-base.png.

cell	fixture (carried ledger ← this round)	head oracle	base oracle	result
`fresh-falling` (`59f6489` repro)	r6: 5 C, posted 5, fresh 5, floor c ← re-post 2 + draft 4 new	silent	silent	head silent; VOLUME line is the wire oracle: totals rose 5→6 while fresh fell 5→4 — the exact shape the old totals window false-fired on; events agree
`backlog-clearing` (`59f6489`)	r6: 5 C, fresh 0 ← re-post 3 of 5, nothing new	silent (veto: 3 < 5)	silent	head silent — fresh 0 vs 0 would read "not shrinking" without the veto; sentinel present
`zero-fresh-holds` (`59f6489`)	r6: 5 C, fresh 0 ← all 5 re-posted	fires `{criticals:5, fresh:0, prevFresh:0}` — renamed fields	silent	head fires on all surfaces; exactly ONE `RESIDUAL-RISK:` line, collapsed, scaffold pipes intact; event + cappedBy identical across arms (advisory moved nothing)
`fresh-firing`	r6: 2 C, fresh 2 ← 2 re-posted + 3 fresh	fires `{criticals:5, fresh:3, prevFresh:2}`	silent	new-Criticals-every-round shape still fires under the fresh window
`prev-floor-o` (`bd857f0`)	r6: recorded floor `o`, all other conjuncts hold	silent	silent	posture change suppresses; recovery sentinel proves the predecessor loaded (silence is the posture, not a dead fixture)
`fold-stamp` (`edfd5fa` repro)	r6: floor stamped `c` but work-list carries a Suggestion (absent floor folded to auto)	silent	silent	the stamp lied; `prevPostedSuggestion` suppresses; body never carries the floor-futility sentence
`stamp-honest`	r6: floor `c`, Critical-only list	fires `{criticals:3, fresh:1, prevFresh:1}`	silent	an honestly engaged predecessor passes both new guards
`pure-foreign` (`4ced96c` repro)	own round was a clean LGTM (posted 0); recovered list is foreign, NOT merged, carries a stranger's C	silent	silent	all three list-derived facts withheld; body has no advisory prose; events agree
`foreign-merged`	same list, `merged: true`	fires `{criticals:1, fresh:1, prevFresh:0}`	silent	the union keeps this account's entries — the list speaks for it again
`own-list`	`foreign: false`	fires	silent	the refusal is provenance-specific, not a blanket silence
`obs-and-advisory` (#9623 merge)	r6 anchored: 1 C on `a.ts`, fresh 1 ← 2 fresh C, one recurring into `a.ts`	`CONVERGENCE:` ×1 AND `RESIDUAL-RISK:` ×1; composed JSON carries both fields; advisory leads "Residual risk:", not "Convergence:"	`CONVERGENCE:` ×1 only	both features render in one round under their own names; no `HEALTH:` on either arm (its shape absent); events agree
`pre-fresh-marker`	r6: `posted` recorded, NO `fresh` key (pre-field marker)	silent	silent	the window degrades open — a missing count is not substituted by the total
`pre-floor`	r1, floor `o` ← round 2 of `auto`	silent + sentinel	silent	the floor-futility claim does not publish before engagement
`shrink`	r6: posted 3, fresh 3 ← 1 fresh C	silent	silent	stdout+stderr byte-identical across arms (temp paths normalized) — the no-shape promise holds at the new head
`persist-fire`	head's fired verdict JSON → each arm's real `saveReviewArtifact`	persisted verdict CARRIES `residualRisk` (all 5 fields; `fresh`/`prevFresh` renamed)	same input: field DROPPED	R5-2 behavior re-proven after the rename (`04-persist-ab-same-input.png`)
`persist-bad` ×4	wrong shape / wrong recommendation / string count / negative count	all four refused with `Composed verdict.residualRisk.*` errors, nothing persisted	—	shape-check live at the boundary; counts through `volumeOf`

90/90 assertions passed (logs/ab-assertions.json); per-cell results in harness/cells/<arm>/<cell>/work/result.json.

Corrections

Descriptions in the PR body that do not match the final head (corrections to the description, not requests to change code). Carried from previous rounds and stale again — the body was not updated for the five new commits. Gate witness: evidence/03-gates-head-vs-base.png.

"nine tests pin the full firing conjunction" (lib/convergence.test.ts) — the file now contains 70 tests; 18 are advisory-signal/advisory-render tests (12 in the convergenceAssessment describe, 4 root-level guard tests, 2 convergenceAdvisory render tests). Measured: 70/70 pass within the 587-green scoped baseline.
"-t '#9410' — two tests drive the real compose command" — the filter matches 6 tests in compose-review.test.ts at this head; -t '#9526' matches 12 across compose-review + save-artifact; -t '#9410' matches nothing in convergence.test.ts (its advisory tests postdate the #9526 tagging).
"Full regression … 4297 pass, 1 skipped" (body), "4301 pass / 1 skipped" (round-5 message), "4432 pass / 1 skipped" (round-7 message, macOS) — measured in this Linux container: 4430 passed | 4 skipped at head vs 4394 passed | 4 skipped at base (+36/+0). Skip-count difference from the author's machines is environmental (shellcheck binary, case-sensitive FS); all-pass on both.

Mutation matrix (8 mutants + 2 positive controls — 9/10 rows killed, 1 classified; witness `02-mutation-matrix.png`)

Scoped baseline green first: compose-review + convergence + save-artifact suites, 587 passed | 1 skipped (588) (the skip is the case-sensitive-FS probe). Each mutant applied as an exact single-occurrence string replacement, run, restored via git checkout HEAD --, git status --porcelain verified clean after every row. Every quoted red names the expected-versus-actual mismatch, not an import or fixture break.

#	mutation (scratch, restored)	result
M1	window reverted to posting TOTALS (`fresh: postedFresh` → total; `prevFresh` → `prev.posted`) — `59f6489` claim	KILLED, 2 red: `stays silent while the FRESH rate is falling under re-posts (#9526)` → `expected [ Array(1) ] to have a length of +0 but got 1` (advisory fired where silence expected), plus `fires at zero fresh when the backlog HOLDS` (totals ≠ fresh counts)
M2	delete the backlog-shrinkage veto — `59f6489` claim	KILLED, 2 red: the clearing-backlog wiring fixture (`length of +0 but got 1`) + unit `suppresses when the standing backlog is SHRINKING`
M3	disable the pure-foreign refusal (`pureForeignPrev = false`) — `4ced96c` claim	KILLED, exactly 1 red: the three-arm fixture, `arm: 'pure-foreign'` moved (fires where silence expected) — sibling arms untouched, attribution exact
M4	delete the `prevPostedSuggestion` guard (trust the stamp) — `edfd5fa` claim	KILLED, 2 red: the fold-stamp wiring fixture + unit `suppresses when the predecessor still posted a Suggestion — the stamp lied`
M5	delete the `prevFloor` posture-change guard — `bd857f0` claim	KILLED, 2 red: `stays silent on the round the floor ENGAGES on (#9526)` + unit `suppresses when the previous round posted under a DIFFERENT floor`
M6	tighten the veto to suppress on UNKNOWN predecessor — `59f6489` claim	KILLED, 1 red: unit `abstains on the backlog when the previous count is unknown` → `expected null not to be null`
M7	tighten the floor guard to reject UNRECORDED floors — `bd857f0` claim, the pin's other direction	KILLED, 7 red: the six wiring firing fixtures (each predecessor records no floor; the advisory suppressed where it was expected) + unit `still evaluates when the previous floor was never recorded` → `expected null not to be null` — both directions of the guard pinned, as the commit claims
M8	relax the zero-Critical guard (`<= 0` → `< 0`) — layered-guard probe	SURVIVED — classified below (Findings 2); not a defect
C1	positive control in `convergence.ts`: `LAND_WITH_RESIDUAL_RISK` constant changed	KILLED, 8+ red incl. the wiring fixtures and `saveReviewArtifact > carries the residual-risk advisory into the artifact (#9526)` — proves the runner fails suites where the M2/M4/M5/M6 mutants land
C2	positive control in `compose-review.ts`: rank-2 trim name mangled	KILLED by the intended overflow tests → `expected '⚠️ This body was trimmed…' to contain 'the persistently-critical convergence…'`

All six kill-claims in the three fix-commit messages reproduced. Note on the first C1 attempt: relaxing the zero-Critical guard was first tried as the positive control and SURVIVED — not because the runner is dead (C1/C2 prove otherwise), but because FIRE carries prevCriticals: 2, and with thisCriticals overridden to 0 the backlog veto (0 < 2) catches the case the relaxed guard lets through. That is layered guards hiding each other; the relaxed probe is retained as M8 and classified in Findings.

Advisory-only audit (re-run at the new head)

Production read sites of the assessment, by census (grep over packages/*/src, tests excluded): compose-review.ts (body block, JSON-field spread, terminal record) and save-artifact.ts (validator/persistence). ReviewArtifactV1 is referenced only inside save-artifact.ts — no code consumes the persisted residualRisk, so the durable copy remains a record, not an input. The assessment feeds nothing that moves the event or caps the verdict: every firing cell asserts head/base event agreement (and cappedBy identity on zero-fresh-holds), and all 14 cells agree. The advisory prose's "the standing Critical backlog is not shrinking" is backed wherever it can fire: prevCriticals is defined whenever the signal can reach the veto (undefined only with no recovered predecessor or a pure-foreign list — both already silent via prevHadCritical), and prevHadCritical === true forces prevCriticals ≥ 1, so a fired advisory always measured thisCriticals >= prevCriticals ≥ 1.

Findings

1. (Suggestion, carried — stands) The forgeability threat note still did not survive. Commit 7389a10's message says it "corrects the prevLedgerFacts threat docstring: under auto the floor-engagement conjunct is forgeable via the carried round, so the only unforgeable conjunct is this round's own standing Critical." At head 4ced96c0 no advisory-surface comment carries it (grep: the only forgeable hit is the pre-existing model-identity note at compose-review.ts:5087). The behavior it describes is exactly what the code does: floorEngaged keys on criticalFloorInEffect(input.severityFloor, contextUnavailable, prevRound), and under auto the carried — stranger-influenceable — round number can satisfy that one conjunct; a false fire still needs every other conjunct including this round's OWN standing Critical, and 4ced96c0 additionally removed a stranger's unmerged marker as a source for prevHadCritical. The note's absence remains documentation drift against a commit message, not a code defect. (The sibling half of the threat — the forgeable c stamp — DID get its comment this round: the prevPostedSuggestion wiring comment and docstring state the reporting-fold hole explicitly.)

2. (Completeness reporting, not a merge condition) The surviving M8 mutant is redundant defence, not a coverage gap. Deleting the thisCriticals <= 0 guard changes no test because the backlog veto subsumes it on every shape the wiring can produce: with thisCriticals = 0 and a recovered non-foreign predecessor, prevCriticals ≥ 1 (the list holds the Critical prevHadCritical saw), so 0 < prevCriticals vetoes; and prevCriticals === undefined only where prevHadCritical is already undefined (unrecovered or pure-foreign), which returns null one line earlier. The guard is correct exactly as it stands — it is the cheap first line of a two-line defence. If the author wants it pinned independently, the fixture is { ...FIRE, thisCriticals: 0, prevCriticals: undefined }, which no current test constructs; nothing in this finding blocks the merge.

No new behavioral findings this round: the five delta claims were each exercised through the real command in both directions (fires/silent), the #9623 merge's coexistence and 5-rank ladder hold (RANK_NAMES −1…3 match the skill prose, whose two assertions pass on both arms), and the persistence surface re-proved after the field rename.

Not covered

Per-commit attribution. Depth-2 checkout (git rev-parse --is-shallow-repository = true); git rev-list HEAD^1..HEAD^2 reports 1 commit where the metadata snapshot lists 12 — the shallow boundary makes the five intermediate commits unreachable. The aggregate HEAD^1..HEAD diff is what was verified; the delta is nonetheless attributable to the five commit messages, whose specific claims (five shapes, both-direction pins, matrix kills) were each re-measured above.
Upstream trigger chain. The harness reproduces the wire shape: carried-ledger side files exactly as pr-context writes them, including the foreign/merged flags that decide the new refusal. Recovery of markers from real posted GitHub comments was traced in code, not driven end to end — no GitHub token exists in this sandbox by design. The pure-foreign shape itself is the finding's own witness fixture, not a captured production artifact.
Gate-only cross-round chain cell (previous round's gate-next-from-head/base): not re-run as an A/B cell — the gate path is unchanged by the five delta commits; at head the wiring fixture counts the script-lint gate's standing Critical — advisory and work-list (#9526) passes in the baseline and goes red under M7, which is head-side evidence; the base arm is trivially advisory-blind.
Overflow/trim behavior in the A/B. The 5-rank ladder and the rank-3-keyed tail clause are pinned by the vitest overflow fixtures plus control mutant C2 (2 red on the rank-name change), not by a dedicated A/B cell — base has no advisory, so the cross-arm comparison there reduces to the absence already proven by the silence cells.
Repo-wide gates. Only the affected surfaces ran: review-dir suite on both arms (97 files each), core SKILL.test.ts on both arms, npm run typecheck (repo-wide by construction, clean), ESLint on the seven touched code files (clean, liveness probe caught + clean-after-restore). Other workspaces' suites were not run — the diff touches nothing outside packages/cli/src/commands/review/ and the bundled skill page.
Both arms drove TypeScript source via tsx (symmetric runner). The head's compiled dist/ was separately confirmed to contain the wiring (RESIDUAL-RISK ×3 in dist/src/commands/review/compose-review.js, the recommendation constant in lib/convergence.js, residualRisk ×10 in save-artifact.js).
Flakiness gate runs in the workflow proper, as in previous rounds; not duplicated here.

Methodology

Ran in the CI verify container (node:22-bookworm, Node v22.23.2) on the merge-ref checkout. Targeted gates first: the full src/commands/review/ vitest dir at head and (for delta attribution) at the base worktree, core SKILL.test.ts on both arms, repo npm run typecheck, ESLint on the touched files with a planted-violation liveness probe. The A/B drove the real composeReviewCommand.handler and saveReviewArtifact from both trees through one shared tsx cell runner — each cell in its own temp dir with real plan/ledger/comments files, clean HOME, empty GH_TOKEN; the base worktree at HEAD^1 reused the head dependency tree (the PR's only non-cli change is the bundled SKILL page and its test; internal-link realpath asserted, cli-suite aliasing keeps each arm on its own core source). Mutants were applied one at a time as exact single-occurrence string replacements against the three advisory suites, each kill checked for the intended expected-versus-actual mismatch, restored via git checkout HEAD -- with git status --porcelain verified clean after each row. Evidence captures used scripts/verify-capture.mjs. Raw logs: logs/ (per-suite logs, harness log, matrix log, ab-assertions.json); harness sources: harness/ab-harness.mjs, harness/run-cell.mts, harness/mutation-matrix.mjs; per-cell results under harness/cells/.

Flakiness gate log


rounds=5 files=4 skipped=0
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts
file packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: (cd packages/core) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts


per-file results (P=pass F=fail I=infra-exit, one letter per run):
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: PPPPP

verdict: pass
summary: 4 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

--- per-invocation detail (full copy in the artifact) ---
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)

Evidence images

Harness scripts and raw logs are in the workflow run artifacts (7-day retention).

— Qwen Code · sandboxed verification

qwen-code-ci-bot · 2026-08-22T12:20:57Z

Triage re-run completed without a new review.

⚠️ The bot's only review on 4ced96c01282132dec1ea06e843ce58753e3c81b is a COMMENTED one, which carries no vote — so it has no verdict of its own on this commit, and main needs two approving reviews: an approval left by another account is a separate vote and does not count as the bot's own. Two different things look like this, and the stage-3 comment above says which: the triage skill deferring on purpose at 3/5 — a fork refactor hitting the approval guardrail, or a core change escalated for maintainer awareness, both normal outcomes — or an earlier approval that a push dismissed, leaving only the comment behind, which needs a fresh review.

⚠️ 机器人在 4ced96c01282132dec1ea06e843ce58753e3c81b 上唯一的评审是 COMMENTED，不带票 —— 因此它在该 commit 上没有自己的裁决，而 main 需要两个批准（其他账号的批准是另一张票）。有两种情况长这样，上方的 stage-3 评论会说明是哪一种：triage skill 在 3/5 时有意 defer（fork refactor 命中审批护栏，或核心改动被升级交由维护者把关，两者都是正常结果）；或者更早的批准被一次推送作废、只剩下这条评论，此时需要重新评审。

The stage comments above were updated with the latest result. View workflow run.

上方各阶段评论已更新为最新结果。查看工作流运行。

main renumbered the trim ladder: the convergence observation moved from rank 0 to rank 3 — LAST, on the arithmetic its own block now spells out (shed second it could pay for at most 4% of an overflow, so the author lost the only sentence about the shape of the loop AND the disclosures anyway) — and the not-reviewed disclosures took rank 2. Rank 0 was left empty. This branch's advisory takes that empty rank, and the placement follows main's own argument rather than being wedged in. The ladder now orders by what a dropped block costs its reader: -1 mechanism-health note operator has the `HEALTH:` line 0 residual-risk advisory maintainer has `RESIDUAL-RISK:` AND the composed JSON, which the artifact persists 1 deferred-findings list one copy, in the findings artifact 2 not-reviewed disclosures no copy but the terminal report 3 convergence observation the author's only sentence about the loop Two things the textual merge got wrong and tests did not catch: - `RANK_NAMES` came out with a DUPLICATE `3:` key — this branch's disclosures and main's observation collided on the same literal and the later one silently won, so a dropped disclosure section would have been named "the convergence observation". No conflict marker; found by reading the merged map. The five ranks are now spelled out once each. - The tail clause still keyed on rank 3. Under main's numbering that is the observation, which HAS a durable copy; the rank with nothing behind it is now 2. Keyed wrong it would have told the operator the trimmed set was backed up on exactly the drop that took the disclosures. Re-keyed on 2, and the docblock now says which fact the key stands on rather than naming a number. The disclosure-family blocks return to rank 2 with main, the advisory takes rank 0, and three enumerations follow: the ladder docstring, the `noteTrimmedRanks` docblock, and the bundled skill's trim-order prose with its assertion. Mutation matrix re-run after the merge. New ladder: the advisory sharing rank 1 with the deferral list, sharing rank 2 with the disclosures, and the tail clause keying on the advisory again each turn the suite red. Carried over: reverting the window to totals, deleting the backlog veto, deleting the posture guard, deleting the enforcement-evidence guard, disabling the pure-foreign gate, and dropping `residualRisk` from the artifact all still turn it red. packages/cli 4533 pass / 1 skipped; packages/core skills 379 pass; typecheck, ESLint and Prettier clean on both.

wenshao · 2026-08-22T14:35:39Z

@qwen-code /triage

qwen-code-ci-bot · 2026-08-22T14:36:14Z

Sandboxed verification: ✅ passed — merge-ready (agent verdict) - workflow run

Ran the PR in an isolated, token-free container: A/B against the base build, mock-free harness assertions, targeted gates. Advisory evidence for human reviewers — not a review, an approval, or a CI check.

Scripted assertions: 4756 passed · 0 failed · 4756 total

Flakiness gate: ✅ 4 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

中文 — 判定：✅ 通过 · 可合入（agent 判定）

沙箱验证在隔离、无凭证的容器中执行了该 PR 的代码（与 base 构建 A/B 对照、无 mock harness 断言、定向门禁）。仅作为评审证据，不构成评审、批准或 CI 检查。

脚本断言：4756 通过 · 0 失败 · 4756 总计

抖动门：✅ 4 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

Verification report

PR #9526 Deep Verification (follow-up round 4) — persistently-critical convergence advisory after the ladder re-rank merge

Verdict: merge-ready — 4756/4756 scripted assertions passed, 0 unexpected failures.
Verified head: 925d41ab9793416bb54e02c3d3470f10713e428a (git rev-parse HEAD^2), merged over base tip 39378ac0a4c51eb9f029c38cabc0f62a7f7e820d (HEAD^1). The snapshot's baseRefOid (af25c45e…) predates the latest main merge; HEAD^1 is authoritative for this merge-ref checkout.

中文 — 判定：✅ 通过 · 可合入（agent 判定）

结论：merge-ready —— 4756/4756 脚本化断言全部通过，无意外失败。本轮为第四次跟进轮：上一轮验证的是 4ced96c0；此后分支只新增一个 commit —— 与 main 的合并 925d41ab。该合并在 trim ladder 上发生了真实的内容级解决：main 把收敛观察移到 rank 3（最后）、未审查披露移到 rank 2、空出 rank 0，本 PR 的建议落在那个空位上。本轮的核心工作就是验证这次重排：新加 3 个溢出 A/B cell（binary-search 出真实裁剪阈值）+ 4 个新梯子突变体，并重跑了全部既有测量。

上一轮发现状态（见下表）：F1（save-artifact 接收路径）与 F2（floor 读法缺口）经 persist cell 与 M4–M7 突变重跑，保持已修复；F3（可伪造性 docstring 丢失）依旧成立；PR 正文测试数修正再次过期。
A/B 结论（01-ab-head-vs-base.png，86 断言，复跑两次结果一致）：11 个语义 cell + 3 个溢出 cell + 2 个持久化 cell × head/base 两臂。新梯子行为全部实测：最小溢出下 head 依次丢弃 health(-1) 与建议(0) 而 1/2/3 幸存、通知按梯子顺序点名、终端行与 composed JSON 字段在正文裁剪后仍在；建议+披露同丢时尾句为「among them」；仅丢 deferral 时 head 尾句改为「durable copy elsewhere」而 base 仍是无条件的「only other copy」（PR 对 main 尾句的修正得证）；无触发形状两臂逐字节一致；所有 cell 事件两臂一致。
突变矩阵（02-mutation-matrix.png）：baseline 588 绿；14 行中 13 被钉死（M1–M7 旧守卫 + L1–L4 新梯子 + C1/C2 双阳性对照），合并信息声称的三个梯子突变（建议共用 rank 1、共用 rank 2、尾句重新键到建议）全部复现为红；唯一幸存 M8 依旧分类为冗余防御（convergence.ts 未被合并触碰，且本轮重跑）。
Findings：1 条新 Suggestion（重排遗漏了三处排名枚举：trim? 接口 docblock、save-artifact 两处注释——其中接口 docblock 是本次合并新引入的错误文本；另有一处测试注释把五级梯子写成「four ranks」）+ 1 条旧 Suggestion（F3 文档漂移依旧）。无行为缺陷。
未覆盖：逐提交归属（depth 2）；上游真实触发链（wire shape 复刻）；仓库级套件门（仅 review 目录 + core SKILL + 全仓 typecheck）；workflow 自身的抖动门。

Previous-finding status

This is a follow-up round. The previous report verified head 4ced96c0 and returned merge-ready with one standing Suggestion. Since then exactly one commit landed — the merge of main 925d41ab. Against the new base the PR's effective diff keeps the same eight-file shape; the merge touched the PR's surface only through main's ladder renumbering and its own conflict resolution (git diff 4ced96c0..HEAD on lib/convergence.ts/convergence.test.ts is empty — the signal module is untouched). The round's delta is therefore the re-rank itself. Every measurement below was re-run at the new head.

#	finding	severity	status at head `925d41ab`
1	save-artifact acceptance path for a fired composed JSON unpinned	Suggestion	fixed (re-measured) — `persist-fire` re-run: head persists all five fields intact to disk, base's validator drops `residualRisk` from the identical input; four wrong shapes refused with `Composed verdict.residualRisk.*` errors and nothing written. Carry test alive: it is among the 8 reds of positive control C1.
2	strict-vs-reporting floor reading coverage gap	Suggestion	fixed (re-measured) — M4 (delete the Suggestion guard, 2 red), M5 (delete the floor guard, 2 red), M6 (tighten veto to unknown-suppresses, 1 red), M7 (tighten floor guard to reject unrecorded, 7 red) all killed at the new head, in both directions.
3	forgeability docstring the branch added (commit `7389a10`) did not survive the merge	Suggestion	stands — grep `forgeable\|unforgeable` at the new head finds only the unrelated model-identity/cache-path note (`compose-review.ts:5113`, `submit.ts:967`); no advisory-surface comment carries the threat note. Behavior matches the missing note exactly (traced in Findings 2).
—	PR body test counts stale	correction	stands, stale again — re-measured; see Corrections. The body now additionally says the disclosure is "rank-1 trim"; the merge moved it to rank 0.

Central claim + A/B

Central claim (re-tested at the new head): when the carried telemetry proves the loop is stuck on Criticals — previous round's work-list held a Critical AND this round stands behind one AND the floor is engaged on both rounds (proven, not stamped) AND the two-round FRESH window is present and not shrinking AND the standing backlog is not observably shrinking — the real compose command surfaces land-with-residual-risk on three surfaces (composed-JSON residualRisk, body disclosure, terminal RESIDUAL-RISK: single line), advisory-only; when any conjunct is unproven the output is byte-identical to base. The round-4 delta is the merge's re-ranked ladder, with three falsifiable sub-claims of its own: the advisory sheds at rank 0 (before deferrals, disclosures, observation), the tail clause keys on rank 2 (the one rank with no durable copy), and the five RANK_NAMES are spelled once each.

Delta attribution: the base tip (HEAD^1) already contains #9461's observation, #9623's mechanism-health half, and main's ladder renumbering (observation rank 3, disclosures rank 2, rank 0 empty); grep confirms zero advisory symbols in base. Arm suites: 4530 passed | 4 skipped (4534) at head vs 4494 passed | 4 skipped (4498) at base — exactly +36 passing, +0 failing, +0 skipped, attributed per file by junit: compose-review.test.ts 449→465 (+16), lib/convergence.test.ts 52→70 (+18), save-artifact.test.ts 52→54 (+2); every other file identical. Core SKILL.test.ts passes 26/26 on BOTH arms. The 4 skips are the identical environmental set on both arms (3× no shellcheck binary in-container, 1× case-sensitive-FS probe).

Harness: harness/ab-harness.mjs + harness/run-cell.mts drive the REAL composeReviewCommand.handler / saveReviewArtifact from each tree via tsx (no vitest, no mocks), each cell in its own temp dir, clean HOME, empty GH_TOKEN. Overflow cells binary-searched the real trimming threshold per shape. Base tree = HEAD^1 worktree wired to the head dependency tree. Control purity: the PR touches packages/core in SKILL.md + SKILL.test.ts only; realpath asserted — node_modules/@qwen-code/qwen-code-core resolves to head's packages/core, and the driven code path's only core import (atomicWriteFileSync, save cells) cannot be affected by a skill-page diff; the cli vitest arms alias core to each tree's OWN source. Run twice: identical 86/86 both runs. Witness: evidence/01-ab-head-vs-base.png.

cell	fixture (carried ledger ← this round)	head oracle	base oracle	result
`zero-fresh-holds`	r6: 3 C, fresh 0 ← all 3 re-posted	fires `{criticals:3, fresh:0, prevFresh:0}`; ONE collapsed `RESIDUAL-RISK:` line, scaffold pipes intact	silent	head fires on all surfaces; event + cappedBy identical across arms
`fresh-falling`	r6: 5 C, fresh 5 ← re-post 2 + 4 new	silent	silent	VOLUME is the wire oracle: totals rose 5→6 while fresh fell 5→4 — the exact shape the old totals window false-fired on; VOLUME byte-identical across arms
`backlog-clearing`	r6: 5 C, fresh 0 ← re-post 3 of 5	silent (veto: 3 < 5)	silent	fresh 0 vs 0 would read "not shrinking" without the veto
`fresh-firing`	r6: 2 C, fresh 2 ← re-post 2 + 3 new	fires `{criticals:5, fresh:3, prevFresh:2}`	silent	new-Criticals-every-round shape still fires under the fresh window
`prev-floor-o`	r6: recorded floor `o`, all else holds	silent	silent	posture change suppresses; VOLUME sentinel proves the predecessor loaded
`fold-stamp`	r6: floor stamped `c`, work-list carries a Suggestion	silent	silent	the stamp lied; `prevPostedSuggestion` suppresses; no floor-futility sentence in body
`stamp-honest`	r6: floor `c`, Critical-only list	fires `{criticals:2, fresh:1, prevFresh:1}`	silent	an honestly engaged predecessor passes both guards
`pure-foreign`	own round clean; recovered list foreign, NOT merged, carries a stranger's C	silent	silent	all list-derived facts withheld (note: `prevFresh`/`prevFloor` still read the marker, but the `prevHadCritical` guard runs first — silence is structural); events agree
`foreign-merged`	same list, `merged: true`	fires `{criticals:1, fresh:1, prevFresh:0}`	silent	the union keeps this account's entries
`shrink`	r6: posted 3, fresh 3 ← 1 fresh C	silent	silent	stdout+stderr byte-identical across arms — the no-shape promise holds at the new head
`obs-and-advisory`	r6: 1 C on `a.ts` ← 2 fresh C, one recurring into `a.ts`	`CONVERGENCE:` ×1 AND `RESIDUAL-RISK:` ×1; JSON carries both fields; advisory leads "Residual risk:"	`CONVERGENCE:` ×1, no advisory surface	both features render in one round under their own names; events agree
`overflow-advisory-first` (NEW)	firing shape + binary-searched blocker (55,406 chars)	drops exactly ranks [-1, 0]; notice names health then advisory in ladder order; ranks 1/2/3 survive; body lost the advisory prose; terminal line + JSON field survive; tail "durable copy elsewhere", no artifact pointer	no advisory anywhere; never names the advisory rank	the re-rank proven: the advisory is rank 0 — first content to yield, before deferral/disclosure/observation (`01-ab-head-vs-base.png`)
`overflow-with-disclosures` (NEW)	firing shape + 3k disclosure + sized blocker (55,000 chars — the search floor; every size in the window dropped rank 2)	drops [-1, 0, 2]; notice names all three kinds; tail "the only other copy of the disclosures among them"; terminal + JSON survive	drops [-1, 2] at the same size (no rank 0 to shed); never names an advisory	the rank-2-keyed tail clause names the unbacked half correctly on a combined drop
`overflow-deferral-only` (NEW)	no predecessor; critical floor; 3 Suggestions + sized blocker — identical input on both arms	drops [1]; artifact pointer present; tail "every section that went also has a durable copy elsewhere"	drops [1]; tail "which is their only other copy" (unconditional)	the PR's tail-clause fix vs main, same input both arms: head no longer posts the false "only copy" record over a rank-1-only drop
`persist-fire`	fired verdict JSON → each arm's real `saveReviewArtifact`	persisted artifact CARRIES `residualRisk` (all 5 fields)	same input: field DROPPED; artifact still written	R5-2 behavior holds at the new head
`persist-bad` ×4	wrong shape / wrong recommendation / string count / negative count	all four refused with `Composed verdict.residualRisk.*` errors, nothing persisted	—	shape-check live at the boundary; counts through `volumeOf`

86/86 assertions passed both runs (logs/ab-assertions.json); per-cell results under harness/cells/<arm>/<cell>/result.json; overflow thresholds in the log's sizing section.

Corrections

Descriptions that do not match the final head (corrections to the description, not requests to change code). Gate witness: evidence/03-gates-head-vs-base.png.

"nine tests pin the full firing conjunction" (lib/convergence.test.ts) — the file now contains 70 tests (base: 52); 14 are advisory tests (12 in the convergenceAssessment describe — 11 degraded arms + the zero-fresh fire — and 2 convergenceAdvisory render tests). Measured: 70/70 pass in the scoped baseline and standalone.
"-t '#9410' — two tests drive the real compose command" — measured: the filter matches 6 tests in compose-review.test.ts (and nothing in convergence.test.ts); -t '#9526' matches 12 across the review dir.
"Full regression … 4297 pass, 1 skipped" (body) and the merge message's "packages/cli 4533 pass / 1 skipped" (macOS) — measured in this Linux container: 4530 passed | 4 skipped at head vs 4494 passed | 4 skipped at base (+36/+0/+0). Skip-count difference from the author's machines is environmental (shellcheck binary, case-sensitive FS); all-pass on both arms, twice.
"Under body-overflow pressure the disclosure is rank-1 trim and yields first" (Risk & Scope) — after this round's merge the advisory is rank 0; it yields first of all content ranks (after the mechanism-health note at rank -1), proven by the overflow-advisory-first cell.

Findings

1. (Suggestion, new this round) The re-rank missed three rank enumerations — one of them introduced by the merge itself. The merge message claims "three enumerations follow: the ladder docstring, the noteTrimmedRanks docblock, and the bundled skill's trim-order prose with its assertion." Verified: those three are correct (RANK_NAMES has five entries keyed once each; the noteTrimmedRanks docblock describes rank 2 as the one rank with nothing behind it; SKILL.md prose and its two test assertions match the ladder). But the same re-rank left three siblings stale:

compose-review.ts:4568–4577 — the trim?: number interface docblock, edited by this merge (the effective diff replaces base's correct sentence), now reads "(the deferral list, rank 1) yields before the persistently-critical advisory (rank 2 — it keeps two whole copies elsewhere), which yields before the disclosures of what went unreviewed (rank 3)". Under the merged ladder the advisory is rank 0 and yields before the deferral list, the disclosures are rank 2, and rank 3 is the observation — the sentence has the policy order inverted.
save-artifact.ts:64–66 — "convergence is rank 0 and sheds before everything, while this one is rank 2 and yields after the fold and the deferral display." Accurate under the old branch ladder (observation 0, advisory 2); after the re-rank it states exactly the inverse of the truth (observation 3 = sheds last, advisory 0 = sheds first).
save-artifact.ts:380 — "rank 2 sheds before the not-reviewed disclosures" likewise still names the advisory rank 2.
Related nit: SKILL.test.ts:463 comment "All four ranks, in the order the ladder actually drops them" — the ladder has five ranks and the assertion below the comment pins all five.

The code is right — the A/B overflow cells and mutants L1–L4 pin the actual order — so this is documentation drift on comments that explicitly describe policy, at the severity the same class carried in previous rounds. Minimal fix: renumber the three comments to the merged ladder (advisory 0, deferral 1, disclosures 2, observation 3) and say "five ranks" in the test comment; the prose in the first docblock also needs its before/after clauses swapped, not just renumbered.

2. (Suggestion, carried — stands) The forgeability threat note still did not survive. Commit 7389a10's message says it "corrects the prevLedgerFacts threat docstring: under auto the floor-engagement conjunct is forgeable via the carried round." At head 925d41ab no advisory-surface comment carries it (grep: the only forgeable hits are the pre-existing model-identity/cache-path notes at compose-review.ts:5113 and submit.ts:967). The behavior it describes is exactly what the code does: floorEngaged keys on criticalFloorInEffect(input.severityFloor, contextUnavailable, prevRound), and under auto the carried round number can satisfy that one conjunct; a false fire still needs every other conjunct including this round's OWN standing Critical, and prevHadCritical cannot come from a stranger's unmerged list (round-3's 4ced96c0 refusal, re-proven by the pure-foreign cell and mutant M3). Documentation drift against a commit message, not a code defect.

3. (Completeness reporting, not a merge condition) The surviving M8 mutant remains redundant defence, re-measured. Relaxing thisCriticals <= 0 to < 0 again changed nothing (588 green → 588 green) at the new head; convergence.ts is untouched by the merge, so the round-3 classification stands on the same mechanism: with thisCriticals = 0 and a recovered non-foreign predecessor, prevCriticals ≥ 1 and the backlog veto (0 < prevCriticals) catches the case the relaxed guard lets through; prevCriticals === undefined only where prevHadCritical is already undefined, which returns null one line earlier. If the author wants it pinned independently, the fixture is { ...FIRE, thisCriticals: 0, prevCriticals: undefined }. Not a merge condition.

No new behavioral findings this round: the merge's three ladder claims were each exercised through the real command (A/B overflow cells) and through mutants (L1–L4, all killed with the intended expected-versus-actual mismatches), and all 14 semantics/persist cells re-passed on both arms.

Mutation matrix (14 mutants + baseline — 13/14 killed, 1 classified; witness `02-mutation-matrix.png`)

Scoped baseline green first: compose-review + convergence + save-artifact suites, 588 passed | 1 skipped (589). Each mutant an exact single-occurrence string replacement, run, restored via git checkout HEAD --, git status --porcelain verified clean after every row (all 14 rows restoredClean=true).

#	mutation (scratch, restored)	result
M1	window reverted to posting TOTALS (`fresh: postedFresh` → `postedInline`; `prevFresh` → `prev.posted`)	KILLED, 2 red: `stays silent while the FRESH rate is falling under re-posts (#9526)` + `fires at zero fresh when the backlog HOLDS`
M2	delete the backlog-shrinkage veto	KILLED, 2 red: the clearing-backlog wiring fixture + unit `suppresses when the standing backlog is SHRINKING`
M3	disable the pure-foreign refusal (`pureForeignPrev = false`)	KILLED, 1 red: `will not read a PURE-FOREIGN work-list as this account's history (#9526)`
M4	delete the `prevPostedSuggestion` guard (trust the stamp)	KILLED, 2 red: the fold-stamp wiring fixture + unit `suppresses when the predecessor still posted a Suggestion`
M5	delete the `prevFloor` posture-change guard	KILLED, 2 red: `stays silent on the round the floor ENGAGES on (#9526)` + unit `suppresses when the previous round posted under a DIFFERENT floor`
M6	tighten the veto to suppress on UNKNOWN predecessor	KILLED, 1 red: unit `abstains on the backlog when the previous count is unknown`
M7	tighten the floor guard to reject UNRECORDED floors	KILLED, 7 red: the six wiring firing fixtures + unit `still evaluates when the previous floor was never recorded` — both directions pinned
M8	relax the zero-Critical guard (`<= 0` → `< 0`) — layered-guard probe	SURVIVED — redundant defence (Findings 3)
L1	advisory shares rank 1 with the deferral list (`trim: 0` → `1`) — merge claim	KILLED, 2 red: `names the trimmed advisory for itself — never a deferral list that does not exist (#9410)` + `warns for the disclosures when the advisory went with them (#9526)`
L2	advisory shares rank 2 with the disclosures (`trim: 0` → `2`) — merge claim	KILLED, same 2 red
L3	tail clause re-keyed on the advisory rank (`includes(2)` → `includes(0)`) — merge claim	KILLED, 2 red: `points at the findings artifact only when the deferral list is what went` + the trimmed-advisory fixture
L4	advisory rank name mangled to the observation (the duplicate-key collision shape the merge message describes)	KILLED, same 2 red as L1
C1	positive control in `convergence.ts`: `LAND_WITH_RESIDUAL_RISK` constant changed	KILLED, 8 red incl. `saveReviewArtifact > carries the residual-risk advisory into the artifact (#9526)`
C2	positive control in `compose-review.ts`: rank-2 trim name mangled	KILLED, 5 red incl. `trims the not-reviewed disclosures only after the deferral display`

All three kill-claims in the merge commit message reproduced (L1/L2/L3). Positive controls landed one in each mutated file.

Advisory-only audit (re-run at the new head)

Production read sites of the assessment, by census (grep over packages/*/src, tests excluded): compose-review.ts (body block, JSON-field spreads, terminal record) and save-artifact.ts (validator/persistence) — unchanged set. ReviewArtifactV1 is referenced only inside save-artifact.ts, so no code consumes the persisted residualRisk: the durable copy remains a record, not an input. Every firing cell asserts head/base event agreement (and cappedBy identity on zero-fresh-holds); all 16 cells agree. The advisory prose's "the standing Critical backlog is not shrinking" remains backed wherever it can fire: prevHadCritical === true forces prevCriticals ≥ 1, so a fired advisory always measured thisCriticals >= prevCriticals ≥ 1.

Not covered

Per-commit attribution. Depth-2 checkout (git rev-parse --is-shallow-repository = true); git rev-list HEAD^1..HEAD^2 reports 1 commit where the metadata snapshot lists 13 — the shallow boundary makes the intermediate commits unreachable. The aggregate HEAD^1..HEAD diff (8 files) is what was verified; this round's delta is a single merge commit whose resolution claims were each re-measured above.
Upstream trigger chain. The harness reproduces the wire shape: carried-ledger side files exactly as pr-context writes them, including the foreign/merged flags. Recovery of markers from real posted GitHub comments was traced in code, not driven end to end — no GitHub token exists in this sandbox by design.
Overflow sizing is synthetic. Blockers are 'B'.repeat(n) sized by binary search against the real budget; real model-written bodies overflow with different content mixes. The ORDER assertions (which ranks drop, what the notice names, what survives) do not depend on the content, but the exact threshold does.
Repo-wide gates. Only the affected surfaces ran: review-dir suite on both arms (98 files each), core SKILL.test.ts on both arms, npm run typecheck (repo-wide by construction, clean), ESLint on the seven touched code files (clean, liveness probe caught 2/2 planted errors and was removed clean). Other workspaces' suites were not run — the effective diff touches nothing outside packages/cli/src/commands/review/ and the bundled skill page. Main-side changes that rode in with the merge (web-shell, sdk, workflows) are base content for this PR, not verified here.
Both arms drove TypeScript source via tsx (symmetric runner). The head's compiled dist/ was separately confirmed to contain the wiring (RESIDUAL-RISK ×3 in dist/src/commands/review/compose-review.js).
Flakiness gate runs in the workflow proper, as in previous rounds; the A/B harness itself was run twice with identical 86/86 results.
The observation-side handling of foreign lists (diagnoseConvergence reads prev facts ungated by pureForeignPrev) is feat(review): tell the author why a review loop is not settling #9461's surface, pre-existing and out of this PR's diff; the advisory side is gated, and the prevHadCritical guard runs before any ungated field is read, so advisory silence on pure-foreign inputs is structural (cell pure-foreign + mutant M3).

Methodology

Ran in the CI verify container (node:22-bookworm, Node v22.23.2) on the merge-ref checkout. Targeted gates first: the full src/commands/review/ vitest dir at head (twice) and at the base worktree, core SKILL.test.ts on both arms, repo npm run typecheck, ESLint on the touched files with a planted-violation liveness probe. The base worktree at HEAD^1 reused the head dependency tree: auxiliary workspace dist/ dirs and the package-local node_modules of core/cli (which hold non-hoisted deps like ajv) were symlinked from head — none of those packages is touched by the PR (effective diff is 8 files); packages/cli/src/generated/git-commit.ts was copied (build prerequisite only); internal-link realpath asserted (node_modules/@qwen-code/qwen-code-core → head packages/core, whose only PR change is the bundled skill page, not consumed by the driven path), and cli's vitest aliases core to each tree's OWN source. The A/B drove the real composeReviewCommand.handler and saveReviewArtifact from both trees through one shared tsx cell runner — each cell in its own temp dir with real plan/ledger/comments files, clean HOME, empty GH_TOKEN; overflow cells binary-searched the minimal trimming blocker per shape on the head arm and re-ran the base arm at the same size. Mutants were applied one at a time as exact single-occurrence string replacements against the three advisory suites (baseline 588 green), each kill checked for the intended expected-versus-actual mismatch, restored via git checkout HEAD -- with git status --porcelain verified clean after each row. Evidence captures used scripts/verify-capture.mjs. Raw logs: logs/ (per-suite logs, junit files, harness logs, ab-assertions.json, per-mutant logs, matrix-rows.json); harness sources: harness/ab-harness.mjs, harness/run-cell.mts, harness/gen-cells.mjs, harness/mutation-matrix.mjs; per-cell results under harness/cells/.

Flakiness gate log


rounds=5 files=4 skipped=0
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts
file packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: (cd packages/core) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts


per-file results (P=pass F=fail I=infra-exit, one letter per run):
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: PPPPP

verdict: pass
summary: 4 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

--- per-invocation detail (full copy in the artifact) ---
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)

Evidence images

Harness scripts and raw logs are in the workflow run artifacts (7-day retention).

— Qwen Code · sandboxed verification

qwen-code-ci-bot

LGTM, looks ready to ship. ✅

qwen-code-ci-bot

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

Not reviewed: reverse audit — did not converge within the reverse-audit round cap of 5.

Not explored to full depth (tool budget reached): chunk 2: running the two new compose-review.test.ts fixtures (worktree has no node_modules and core dist is unbuilt; full npm ci + build was disproportionate — oracles….

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 11, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:2939 — [review] 'never caps the verdict' pinned only by two name filters on cappedBy
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:4575 (+12 locations) — [review] class: ~12 trim-ladder comments/docs contradict the shipped ladder (advisory=0, disclosures=2, observation=3)
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1142 — [probe] doubly-determined 'this round posts no Critical' test — guard-deletion mutant ships green
packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts:596 — [probe] wrong-shape case 4 uses stale posted/prevPosted keys — negative-count rejection untested
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:2969 — [probe] deterministic-tagged Suggestion left inline by enforcement suppresses the advisory permanently
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:3224 — [review] 'previous work-list held no Critical' fixture doubly determined; empty-list shape uncovered
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1188 — [review] backlog veto's GROWING direction has no fixture — a !== mutant ships green
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1298 — [review] advisory markdown scaffold pipes/separator pinned by no test
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.ts:1134 — [review] 'stand again this round' asserts identity the count-only facts cannot establish
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:3841 — [probe] fixture comment records a nonexistent mutant (+ relocatedCriticals.length)
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1251 — [review] 'still evaluates when unreadable' pins an unreachable tuple; unreadable list actually suppresses
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1195 — [review] abstention test pins an unreachable tuple — truncation yields an undercount, never undefined
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1114 — [probe] criticals field's source slot unpinned — a prevCriticals-reading mutant ships green
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:887 — [review] 'posting window' docstring drift — the gate is the FRESH window (3 sites + parenthetical)
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1161 — [review] three degrade-open arms pin producer-impossible inputs with reachability claims

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

未审查：reverse audit — did not converge within the reverse-audit round cap of 5。

未探索到全部深度（达到工具调用预算）：chunk 2：running the two new compose-review.test.ts fixtures (worktree has no node_modules and core dist is unbuilt; full npm ci + build was disproportionate — oracles…。

收敛姿态下延后（第 11 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 15 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.15)

main landed #9759, a comments-only pass that names the axis wherever a comment says "rank N", because `trim` and `keep` now both use small integers for opposite orderings — `trim: 3` sheds LAST, `keep: 3` is spent FIRST. Resolutions: - `noteTrimmedRanks` docblock: #9759 edited the sentence this branch had already replaced wholesale. This branch's content stays and adopts the discipline — every number in it now says `trim rank`. - `lib/convergence.test.ts`: main added an `isFreshDraft` describe (#9674's fix-induced marking) where this branch's fixtures sit, and both sides were cut mid-`it` sharing one terminator. main's block goes first, where main put it; this branch's follows. Two comments of this branch's own were STALE from last merge's renumber, and neither is reachable by a test — found by reading, in exactly the class #9759 exists to prevent: - the artifact-pointer note still said "Ranks 2 and 3 can drop alone — rank 3 does on any run with disclosures", written when disclosures were rank 3; they are trim rank 2 now and the advisory is trim rank 0. - `Bi.trim`'s docstring still described the pre-renumber order (deferral list 1 -> advisory 2 -> disclosures 3). It now states the current order and why it runs that way, and says outright that `keep` above it is a different axis. One of main's own comments became ambiguous because of this branch, so it is qualified rather than left: the observation's "Shed second (it was rank 0)" is historically true, and rank 0 is now the residual-risk advisory's slot. `isFreshDraft` gaining the fix-induced arm changes what `postedFresh` counts, which is the number this branch's window runs on. That is the intended direction — a NEW defect wearing an old id is first-time work — and both ends of the window are computed the same way in successive rounds, so the comparison stays like-for-like. Mutation matrix re-run after the merge: the advisory sharing trim rank 1, the tail clause keying on the advisory, reverting the window to totals, deleting the backlog veto, deleting the enforcement-evidence guard, and disabling the pure-foreign gate each still turn the suite red. packages/cli 4692 pass / 1 skipped; packages/core skills 384 pass; typecheck, ESLint and Prettier clean on both.

…d reading (#9526) Round 11's two Criticals. Both reproduced through the real composer before anything was changed. R11-2 — a standing gate Critical entered the posting set twice, and the pair compounded. This is a regression from this branch's own commit d72287c: once the gate's `[lint]` Criticals are in the carried work-list, SKILL Step 6's still-standing rule tells the model to re-post the entry under its original id while compose re-derives the same Critical from the report. `buildLedger` keys by claimed id and the regenerated copy claims none, so it minted a second id beside the carried one: ROUND1 work-list [R1-1] blocker rendered once ROUND2 work-list [R1-1, R2-1] rendered twice ROUND3 work-list [R1-1, R2-1, R3-1] rendered three times FLIP (revert the gate spread): round-1 work-list [], rendered once `withoutGateReposts` drops the re-post, keeping the GATE's copy rather than the model's. That direction is load-bearing: `[lint]` is not in `DETERMINISTIC_TAG_RE` (`[build]`/`[test]`/`[probe]` only), so the model's copy counts toward `criticalsNeedingVerify` — a linter-proven blocker was pulling the unverified-blocker cap on every re-post round, and the probe shows that cap disappearing with the fix. For the same reason the dedup runs BEFORE `modelBodyCriticals` is captured: dropping the re-post from the body alone left provenance still counting it, so the first draft of this fix fixed the rendering and kept the cap. Matched on the gate line's LOCATOR (the `` `path`:line CODE `` it opens with, backticks normalised), not the whole string: a re-post is model prose that carries the entry forward without reproducing the message byte for byte, and an exact-match rule stopped deduping the moment the wording drifted. The carried id is stripped through the ledger's own `LEDGER_ID_READBACK`. The body composer's gate call is now the only one on that path, so this also removes one half of R4-1's double invocation. R11-1 — the residual-risk facts are read off a work-list that may be known-truncated, without the completeness gate `openCriticals` applies. The completeness gate is NOT restored, and that is the same call as round 8: a whole-list requirement would silence the advisory on exactly the deep-work-list rounds it exists for, which are the rounds the byte budget shortens. What was wrong is what the code SAID about it. The block comment claimed "every input degrades open to no assessment"; two of these inputs do not. "No Suggestion, so the floor was enforcing" and "the backlog is not shrinking" are read off ABSENCE, and a shortened list can only lose entries, so both lean toward firing. `prevTruncated` now rides the facts and the assessment — deciding nothing — and the paragraph discloses, in both languages, that those two readings came off an incomplete list. The sibling diagnosis in the same module qualifies its own recurrence reading on the same fact; this follows that precedent rather than inventing one. The block comment states the exception instead of the blanket claim. Mutation matrix: never rendering the caveat, wiring `prevTruncated` to a constant, disabling the gate dedup, reverting the dedup to exact-match, and removing it from the marker work-list each turn the suite red — alongside the carried set (window on totals, pure-foreign gate, enforcement-evidence guard). packages/cli: 4697 pass / 1 skipped. Typecheck, ESLint and Prettier clean.

qwen-code-ci-bot

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

Not reviewed: reverse audit — did not converge within the reverse-audit round cap of 5.

Not explored to full depth (tool budget reached): chunk 6: full vitest suite run + tsc typecheck of convergence.test.ts (worktree has no node_modules and a monorepo install would exceed this review's budget; mitigated b….

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 12, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:9274 (+6 locations) — [review] Stale comments/identifiers contradict the shipped trim ladder (2→3 renumber fiction, inverted save-artifact ladder, nonexistent sum term)
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1284 — [probe] describe('convergenceAssessment') closes early — a -t filtered run silently skips five tests incl. the #9526 regression
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.ts:1191 — [probe] Advisory asserts Criticals 'stand again' (identity) — the conjunction proves only presence; fires over a cleared predecessor blocker
packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.ts:433 — [probe] prevTruncated present-wrong-shape coerced to false instead of refused — unlike every sibling field
packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts:593 — [probe] wrong-shape fixtures use dead posted/prevPosted keys — negative fresh/prevFresh rejection unpinned (mutant ships green)
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:2092 (+2 locations) — [probe] class: nonConvergence churn Critical never reaches the work-list — silent advisory on NC-only rounds; false 'not shrinking' fire on consecutive churn rounds
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:2091 — [probe] backlog veto straddles the marker format boundary — pre-PR prev lists miss gate entries; undisclosed false fire on the first post-upgrade round
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:3229 — [probe] 'previous work-list held no Critical' fixture overdetermined — the bare-true mutant its comment names ships green
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1339 — [probe] zh truncation caveat's disclosure clause unpinned while en pins both halves — zh-clause mutant ships green
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1198 — [probe] thisCriticals <= 0 gate unpinned — veto co-suppresses the fixture; gate-deletion mutant ships suite-green
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1139 (+3 locations) — [review] class: 'every input degrades OPEN / WITH ONE EXCEPTION' blanket claims falsified — prevFloor absence leans toward firing; three abstain tests contradict…
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.ts:1197 — [review] truncation caveat names only the byte-budget cause — admission-refusal (rejected > 0) rounds publish a false causal claim
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:6238 — [probe] withoutGateReposts locator axes unpinned — both single-axis coarsening mutants ship 496/496 green
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:3296 — [review] thisCriticals re-derives the count already named openCriticals — the drift class the file's header exists to prevent
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1336 — [probe] truncated-predecessor test pins only the caveat strings — advisory-shortening mutant ships 624-passed green
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:2986 — [probe] 'loop IS converging' fixture pins a nonexistent posting-total arm — silence is the fresh window; fossil narrative
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts:9158 — [probe] combined-drop fixture lacks sha — the health note drops as a third section while comments claim two; toContain masks it
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts:1365 — [review] 'Residual risk:' / '残余风险：' lead-in — load-bearing per the docblock — asserted by zero tests in either language
packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts:5007 — [probe] withoutGateReposts inserted between scriptLintGate's docstring and the function — the gate's provenance invariant now documents the wrong function
packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.ts:925 — [review] module header narrates a posted/prevPosted window — the shipped conjunct reads fresh/prevFresh (the totals design the fresh docblock rejects)

Mechanism health: this round did not close cleanly, so it withholds the incremental anchor — and the round it recovered had none either, so the next review re-reads the whole diff and will keep doing so until a round's marker carries an anchor again. (Stated, not acted on — this changes nothing about what the round posts.)

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

未审查：reverse audit — did not converge within the reverse-audit round cap of 5。

未探索到全部深度（达到工具调用预算）：chunk 6：full vitest suite run + tsc typecheck of convergence.test.ts (worktree has no node_modules and a monorepo install would exceed this review's budget; mitigated b…。

收敛姿态下延后（第 12 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 20 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

机制健康：本轮未能干净收尾，因而扣留了增量锚点，而它恢复到的那一轮也没有锚点，因此下一次评审将重读整个 diff——并会一直如此，直到某一轮的标记重新带上锚点。（仅陈述，不据此行动——这不改变本轮发布的任何内容。）

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.22.0)

wenshao · 2026-08-23T05:48:32Z

@qwen-code /triage

qwen-code-ci-bot · 2026-08-23T05:49:05Z

Sandboxed verification: ✅ passed — merge-ready (agent verdict) - workflow run

Ran the PR in an isolated, token-free container: A/B against the base build, mock-free harness assertions, targeted gates. Advisory evidence for human reviewers — not a review, an approval, or a CI check.

Scripted assertions: 350 passed · 0 failed · 350 total

Flakiness gate: ✅ 4 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

中文 — 判定：✅ 通过 · 可合入（agent 判定）

沙箱验证在隔离、无凭证的容器中执行了该 PR 的代码（与 base 构建 A/B 对照、无 mock harness 断言、定向门禁）。仅作为评审证据，不构成评审、批准或 CI 检查。

脚本断言：350 通过 · 0 失败 · 350 总计

抖动门：✅ 4 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

Verification report

PR #9526 Deep Verification (follow-up round 5) — R11 fixes: gate-Critical dedup and truncated-list caveat

Verdict: merge-ready — 350/350 scripted assertions passed, 0 unexpected failures (A/B harness 319 + mutation matrix 22 + targeted gates 9).
Verified head: ad569092bee52a6c6d978637414b91a68baeaf29 (git rev-parse HEAD^2), merged over base tip 7f2c4416b34a2ea4794d2c9d82d338fbe50a701e (HEAD^1). The snapshot's baseRefOid/headRefOid match both arms exactly.

中文 — 判定：✅ 通过 · 可合入（agent 判定）

结论：merge-ready —— 350/350 脚本化断言全部通过，无意外失败。本轮为第五次跟进轮：上一轮验证的是 925d41ab；此后分支新增两个 commit —— 与 main 的合并 6fa3e76e（带入 #9759 的注释轴命名与 #9674 的 isFreshDraft fix-induced 臂）和 R11 修复 ad569092be。因 R11-2 修复的是本 PR 自己早前 commit d72287cc 引入的回归（gate Critical 进入携带工作清单后逐轮复合），本轮首次采用三臂设计：pre-fix 臂 6fa3e76e 展示缺陷、base 臂 7f2c4416 展示功能前行为、head 展示修复。

上一轮发现状态（见下表）：F1 部分修复（trim? docblock 已正确；两处 save-artifact 注释与 SKILL.test.ts 小注依旧成立，另发现同类新成员 save-artifact.test.ts:530）；F2 可伪造性注释依旧缺失；F3（M8 幸存突变）经重跑维持冗余防御分类。
A/B 结论（01-three-arm-cell-table.png，319 断言）：20 cell × 3 臂。R11-2：pre-fix 臂工作清单逐轮复合（1→2→3 条、渲染 3→6→9 次）且验证帽被拉动；head 每轮恒 1 条、渲染恒定、帽不触发；base 工作清单恒空（功能前形态）。R11-1：截断前任下 head 照常触发并在三个面披露限定语（英文 + 中文 + 终端行），prevTruncated: true；完整前任下无限定、prevTruncated: false；pre-fix 触发但无任何限定。全部沿用形状重跑通过，事件与 cappedBy 三臂一致。溢出三 cell 复跑：55,250 字节下 head 恰好丢 [-1, 0]（建议随健康说明先让位，延迟清单与观察幸存）；合并丢弃时尾句按 rank 2 键限定「among them」，base 同一输入仍发无条件的「only other copy」（该尾句差异属本 PR 有效 diff，得证）。
突变矩阵（02-mutation-matrix.png）：baseline 624 绿；18 个真实突变体 17 被钉死 + 3/3 阳性对照；M8 依旧冗余防御；新幸存 N5（把 prevTruncated 接线为常量 true 套件仍绿）——分类为覆盖缺口：本 harness 的 trunc-whole cell 钉住该轴，commit 消息「接线到常量即红」的说法仅对 FALSE 方向成立。
Findings：1 条新 Suggestion（N5 覆盖缺口 + 可钉住它的 fixture）+ 2 条旧 Suggestion 依旧（文档漂移两处）+ 1 条完整性记录（M8）。无行为缺陷。
未覆盖：逐提交归属（depth 2）；上游真实触发链（wire shape 复刻）；仓库级套件门（仅 review 目录 + core SKILL + 全仓 typecheck + 触及文件 ESLint）；workflow 自身抖动门。

Previous-finding status

This is a follow-up round (the previous report verified head 925d41ab and returned merge-ready). Since then the branch gained exactly two commits: a merge of main (6fa3e76e, pulling in #9759's comments-only rank-axis pass and #9674's isFreshDraft fix-induced marking) and ad569092be — the round-11 fix under test this round. New this round: a three-arm design. R11-2 fixes a regression the PR's own earlier commit d72287cc introduced (gate Criticals entered the carried work-list, then compounded), so a base-only control cannot show the dedup doing anything — the pre-fix arm 6fa3e76e is the control that exhibits the defect, base 7f2c4416 shows pre-feature behavior, and head shows the fix.

#	finding (round 4)	severity	status at head `ad569092be`
1	Three stale rank enumerations (`trim?` docblock, save-artifact.ts:64-66, save-artifact.ts:380) + "All four ranks" test-comment nit	Suggestion	partially fixed — the `trim?` interface docblock is now correct (full five-rank ladder + the #9759 axis qualifier; verified at compose-review.ts:4933-4950), and the merge fixed the two further stale comments it named (artifact-pointer note, `Bi.trim` docstring). The two save-artifact comments and the SKILL.test.ts nit STAND (re-measured below), plus one newly-noticed sibling: save-artifact.test.ts:530 carries the same stale "rank 2" claim.
2	Forgeability threat note (commit `7389a10`) did not survive the merge	Suggestion	stands — grep at the new head finds only the unrelated model-identity/cache-path notes (`compose-review.ts:5537`, `submit.ts:1245`); `prevLedgerFacts`'s docblock carries untrusted-shape notes but not the floor-conjunct forgeability note the commit message claims. Behavior matches the missing note (re-proven by cells + mutants M4/M5).
3	M8 survivor classified redundant defence	completeness	stands (re-measured) — the `<= 0 → < 0` relaxation again changed nothing (624 green → 624 green); mechanism re-verified in Findings.
—	PR body test counts stale	correction	stands, stale again — re-measured; see Corrections.

Central claim + A/B

Central claim (re-tested at the new head, three arms): the advisory fires on the persistently-critical conjunction and is advisory-only; the two R11 mechanisms hold —

R11-2: a standing gate Critical enters the posting set exactly once: withoutGateReposts (locator match, backticks normalised, carried id stripped through the ledger's own readback) runs BEFORE modelBodyCriticals is captured, keeping the gate's copy and dropping the model's re-post from both the body and the unverified-blocker cap; the marker work-list applies the same rule, so nothing compounds across rounds.
R11-1: a fired advisory whose predecessor work-list was known-incomplete (prevTruncated) still fires but discloses — EN + ZH body paragraph and the terminal line — that the two absence-derived readings ("the floor was enforcing", "the backlog is not shrinking") came off an incomplete list; the flag decides nothing, rides into the persisted artifact with absence-means-false semantics.

Arm suites (review dir, identical vitest): head 4694 passed | 4 skipped (4698) vs base 4653 passed | 4 skipped (4657) — +41 passing, +0 failing, +0 skipped; the 4 skips are the identical environmental set on both arms. Core SKILL.test.ts: 31/31 on BOTH arms (reads each tree's own SKILL.md via fs, not dist).

Harness: harness/run-cell.mts drives the REAL composeReviewCommand.handler / composeReview / scriptLintGate / parseLedger / saveReviewArtifact from each tree via tsx — no mocks, no stubs; each cell in its own temp dir with clean HOME, empty GH_TOKEN. harness/ab-harness.mjs applies 319 scripted assertions. Witness: evidence/01-three-arm-cell-table.png.

The per-cell witness (evidence/01-three-arm-cell-table.png):

cell                     | head                        | pre-fix (6fa3e76e)      | base (7f2c4416)
-------------------------+-----------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------
zero-fresh-holds         | FIRES c:3,f:0,pf:0,pt:false | FIRES c:3,f:0,pf:0      | silent
fresh-falling            | silent (fresh 5→4 window)   | silent                  | silent
backlog-clearing         | silent (veto 3<5)           | silent                  | silent
fresh-firing             | FIRES c:5,f:3,pf:2,pt:false | FIRES c:5,f:3,pf:2      | silent
prev-floor-o             | silent (posture change)     | silent                  | silent
fold-stamp               | silent (stamp lied)         | silent                  | silent
stamp-honest             | FIRES c:2,f:1,pf:1,pt:false | FIRES c:2,f:1,pf:1      | silent
pure-foreign             | silent (foreign refused)    | silent                  | silent
foreign-merged           | FIRES c:1,f:1,pf:0,pt:false | FIRES c:1,f:1,pf:0      | silent
shrink                   | silent (byte-identical)     | silent (byte-identical) | silent (byte-identical)
obs-and-advisory         | FIRES + CONVERGENCE line    | FIRES + CONVERGENCE     | CONVERGENCE only
trunc-caveat             | FIRES pt:true + caveat×3    | FIRES, no caveat        | silent
trunc-whole              | FIRES pt:false, no caveat   | FIRES, no field         | silent
gate-cap                 | cap NOT armed               | cap ARMED               | cap ARMED

gate-compound ladder (work-list ids per round):
  head  : r1:[R1-1:C](3 renders)  r2:[R2-1:C](3)  r3:[R3-1:C](3)
  prefix: r1:[R1-1:C](3 renders)  r2:[R1-1:C,R2-1:C](6)  r3:[R1-1:C,R2-1:C,R3-1:C](9)
  base  : r1:[](2 renders)        r2:[](2)               r3:[](2)

Reading the ladder: the prefix arm is the defect the round-11 review reported — one blocker gains a second work-list entry and a second body rendering every round, and its model re-post (a [lint] tag is not in DETERMINISTIC_TAG_RE) pulls the unverified-blocker cap. Head keeps exactly one entry per round under a re-minted id (the id chain is deliberately not preserved for gate findings — they are regenerated from the report each round), constant renderings, and no cap. Base predates the feature that created the hazard: gate Criticals render in the body but never join the carried work-list, so nothing compounds — which is precisely why a base-only control could not prove this round's fix, and the pre-fix arm exists.

The obs-and-advisory cell re-proves the naming separation on the new head: one round renders CONVERGENCE: ×1 AND RESIDUAL-RISK: ×1, and the composed JSON carries both convergence and residualRisk fields. All silent cells stay silent on all three arms; shrink is byte-identical (stdout and stderr, after canonicalising the harness's own temp paths). Every cell asserts event + cappedBy identity across the arms — the advisory-only guarantee, now including the two new surfaces.

86→319: assertion totals. logs/ab-assertions.json: 319 passed / 0 failed / 319 total (two earlier harness iterations found and fixed four harness bugs — stale fixture dirs across re-runs, trim-notice surface mis-read (the rank notice rides the terminal remediation, not the body), over-broad caveat string (#9461's observation already says "truncated to fit the marker"), and cell-path embedding in byte-identity compares; none touched PR code).

Overflow cells (real budget, sized blockers)

Blockers are 'B'.repeat(n) under a fired shape; sizes found by stepped scan on head, replayed verbatim on prefix/base.

cell	size	head drops	prefix drops	base drops	oracles
overflow-advisory-first	55,250	[-1, 0]	[-1, 0]	[]	advisory + health shed in the first wave; deferral list (1) and observation (3) survive; notice names health THEN advisory (ladder order); `RESIDUAL-RISK:` line + JSON field survive the trim; base never names the advisory rank
overflow-with-disclosures	56,000	[-1, 0, 2]	[-1, 0, 2]	[]	tail clause keys on rank 2: "the only other copy of the disclosures among them"; terminal + JSON survive; prefix identical (delta-scoped)
overflow-deferral-only	56,000	[1, 2]	[1, 2]	[1, 2]	rank 1 never drops alone in this shape (the small rank-2 disclosure co-sheds); on the combined drop head scopes the "only copy" claim to the disclosures — base over the SAME input posts the unconditional "their only other copy", the false record the PR's rank-2-keyed clause replaces (tail diff is PR diff: verified in `HEAD^1..HEAD`)

Merge-message claim probed: the `isFreshDraft` window stays like-for-like

The merge commit (6fa3e76e) concedes that main's #9674 arm to isFreshDraft (a fix-induced re-report counts as first-time work) "changes what postedFresh counts, which is the number this branch's window runs on", and claims the comparison stays like-for-like because both ends are computed the same way in successive rounds. Traced through the code rather than assumed: this round's end is postedFresh, computed at compose-review.ts:3212 by filtering draftedFindingsOf(...) through isFreshDraft; the SAME value rides the marker (ledgerMarkerFor(..., result.postedFresh, ...) at 1564, stamped fresh at 2127), and the next round reads it back through prevLedgerFacts (volume-capped at 1898-99) into convergence.prev.fresh → the window's prevFresh (3307). One computation, one stamp, one read-back — the claim holds within a CLI version. The one edge it cannot cover is inherent to carried telemetry, not this PR: a loop that crosses a mid-loop CLI upgrade straddling the #9674 change compares an old-scheme stamp against a new-scheme count. That is true of every carried field and is not a defect of this diff; noted for the record, not as a finding.

Corrections

Descriptions that do not match the final head (corrections to the description, not requests to change code). Gate witness: evidence/04-gates-head-vs-base.png.

"nine tests pin the full firing conjunction" (lib/convergence.test.ts) — the file now runs 75 tests; 15 are advisory-specific (12 in the convergenceAssessment describe, the new top-level fires on a truncated predecessor, and says the reading came off one, and 2 convergenceAdvisory render tests). Measured: 75/75 pass standalone.
"-t '#9410' — two tests drive the real compose command" — measured: the filter matches 6 tests; -t '#9526' now matches 16 across the review dir (round 4: 12 — the four new R11 tests all carry the feat(review): add the persistently-critical convergence advisory (land-with-residual-risk) #9526 tag).
"Full regression … 4297 pass, 1 skipped" (body) and the fix commit's "packages/cli: 4697 pass / 1 skipped" (macOS) — measured in this Linux container, review dir only: 4694 passed | 4 skipped at head vs 4653 passed | 4 skipped at base (+41/+0/+0). The skip-count difference from the author's machines is environmental (shellcheck binary, case-sensitive FS); all-pass on both arms. The author's full packages/cli numbers were not re-measured (same scope choice as round 4).
"Under body-overflow pressure the disclosure is rank-1 trim and yields first" (Risk & Scope) — still the round-4 state: the advisory is trim rank 0, proven again this round by the overflow-advisory-first cell dropping exactly [-1, 0] at 55,250 bytes.
Fix-commit message: "Mutation matrix: … wiring prevTruncated to a constant … each turn the suite red" — measured: true of the constant FALSE (the truncated wiring fixture kills it), but the constant TRUE survives the whole suite green (mutant N5 below). The claim holds in one direction only.

Findings

No behavioral defects this round: both R11 mechanisms hold against the pre-fix arm that exhibits the defects, and all carried semantics re-pass on all three arms. The four findings below are one new coverage gap and three carried documentation/completeness items.

1. (Suggestion, new this round) The suite cannot tell prevTruncated wiring from a constant TRUE — the false-disclosure direction is unpinned. Mutant N5 replaced the wiring (convergence && !pureForeignPrev ? convergence.prev.truncated : undefined) with the constant true and the entire scoped suite stayed green (624/624). Under that mutant every fired advisory — including rounds whose predecessor list is WHOLE — publishes "the previous round's work list was truncated to fit the marker…", a false record of exactly the class this module polices, and the residualRisk.prevTruncated field persists true for every fired artifact. The suite pins the true direction (the truncated wiring fixture asserts prevTruncated).toBe(true) and the caveat text) but not the false one: the #9410 firing fixtures use toMatchObject (extra keys pass) and no whole-list fixture asserts the caveat's ABSENCE. The harness's trunc-whole cell is the fixture that goes red: a fired round with a whole predecessor must compose prevTruncated: false, render no caveat in either language, and print none on the terminal — all three are asserted there. One-line pin for the author: in any whole-predecessor firing fixture, expect(composed.residualRisk?.prevTruncated).toBe(false) (or expect(composed.body).not.toContain('read off a list known to be incomplete') — advisory-specific, since #9461's observation never says that string over a whole list). Note this corrects the fix-commit's mutation claim, quoted under Corrections.

2. (Suggestion, carried — partially fixed, remainder stands) The stale rank enumerations. Round 4's finding is half-closed at the new head: the trim? interface docblock (round 4's item introduced by the prior merge) is now CORRECT — it enumerates the merged ladder (health -1, advisory 0, deferral 1, disclosures 2, observation 3) with the #9759 axis qualifier ("keep above is a DIFFERENT axis; a number here is a trim rank"), and the two branch-owned comments the merge message names (the artifact-pointer note, the Bi.trim docstring) are fixed too. What still stands, byte-identical to round 4:

save-artifact.ts:64-66 — "convergence is rank 0 and sheds before everything, while this one is rank 2 and yields after the fold and the deferral display" — under the current ladder the observation is trim rank 3 (sheds LAST) and the advisory is trim rank 0 (sheds FIRST); the sentence states the inverse of the truth in both directions.
save-artifact.ts:380 — "rank 2 sheds before the not-reviewed disclosures" likewise still names the advisory rank 2.
NEW sibling of the same class, not listed in round 4: save-artifact.test.ts:530 — the test comment repeats "rank 2 sheds before the not-reviewed disclosures".
Round 4's nit stands: SKILL.test.ts:463 — "All four ranks, in the order the ladder actually drops them" — the ladder has FIVE ranks, and the assertion immediately below pins all five.
The code is right (the overflow cells and mutants L1–L4 pin the actual order), so this remains documentation drift on comments that explicitly describe policy. Minimal fix: renumber the three save-artifact comments to the merged ladder (advisory 0, deferral 1, disclosures 2, observation 3 — and swap the before/after clauses in the interface comment, since it inverts the order rather than just misnumbering it), and say "five ranks" in the test comment.

3. (Suggestion, carried — stands) The forgeability threat note still did not survive. Commit 7389a10's message says it "corrects the prevLedgerFacts threat docstring: under auto the floor-engagement conjunct is forgeable via the carried round." At head ad569092be no advisory-surface comment carries it (grep: the only forgeable hits are the pre-existing model-identity/cache-path notes at compose-review.ts:5537 and submit.ts:1245; prevLedgerFacts's docblock has untrusted-shape notes but not this one). The behavior it describes is exactly what the code does: floorEngaged keys on criticalFloorInEffect(input.severityFloor, contextUnavailable, prevRound), and under auto the carried round number can satisfy that one conjunct; a false fire still needs every other conjunct including this round's OWN standing Critical, and prevHadCritical cannot come from a stranger's unmerged list (re-proven by the pure-foreign cell and mutant M3). Documentation drift against a commit message, not a code defect.

4. (Completeness reporting, not a merge condition) The surviving M8 mutant remains redundant defence, re-measured. Relaxing thisCriticals <= 0 to < 0 again changed nothing (624 green → 624 green) at the new head; convergence.ts is untouched by this round's fix commit, so the round-3/4 classification stands on the same mechanism: with thisCriticals = 0 and a recovered non-foreign predecessor, prevCriticals ≥ 1 and the backlog veto (0 < prevCriticals) catches the case the relaxed guard lets through; prevCriticals === undefined only where prevHadCritical is already undefined, which returns null one line earlier. If the author wants it pinned independently, the fixture is { ...FIRE, thisCriticals: 0, prevCriticals: undefined }.

Mutation matrix (18 mutants + 3 positive controls + baseline — 17/18 killed, 2 classified; witness `02-mutation-matrix.png`)

Scoped baseline green first: compose-review + convergence + save-artifact suites, 624 passed (624). Each mutant an exact single-occurrence string replacement (uniqueness verified in-file before running), run, restored via git checkout HEAD --, git status --porcelain verified clean after every row (all rows restoredClean=true). Positive controls land one in each file a mutant touches.

#	mutation (scratch, restored)	result
M1	window reverted to posting TOTALS (`fresh: postedFresh` → `postedInline`; `prevFresh` → `prev.posted`)	KILLED, 2 red: `stays silent while the FRESH rate is falling under re-posts (#9526)` + `fires at zero fresh when the backlog HOLDS`
M2	delete the backlog-shrinkage veto	KILLED, 2 red: the clearing-backlog wiring fixture + unit `suppresses when the standing backlog is SHRINKING`
M3	disable the pure-foreign refusal (`pureForeignPrev = false`)	KILLED, 1 red: `will not read a PURE-FOREIGN work-list as this account's history (#9526)`
M4	delete the `prevPostedSuggestion` guard (trust the stamp)	KILLED, 2 red: the fold-stamp wiring fixture + unit `suppresses when the predecessor still posted a Suggestion`
M5	delete the `prevFloor` posture-change guard	KILLED, 2 red: `stays silent on the round the floor ENGAGES on (#9526)` + unit `suppresses when the previous round posted under a DIFFERENT floor`
M6	tighten the veto to suppress on UNKNOWN predecessor	KILLED, 1 red: unit `abstains on the backlog when the previous count is unknown`
M7	tighten the floor guard to reject UNRECORDED floors	KILLED, 7 red: the six wiring firing fixtures + unit `still evaluates when the previous floor was never recorded` — both directions pinned
M8	relax the zero-Critical guard (`<= 0` → `< 0`) — layered-guard probe	SURVIVED — redundant defence (Findings 4)
L1	advisory shares trim rank 1 with the deferral list (`trim: 0` → `1`)	KILLED, 2 red: `names the trimmed advisory for itself — never a deferral list that does not exist (#9410)` + `warns for the disclosures when the advisory went with them (#9526)`
L2	advisory shares trim rank 2 with the disclosures (`trim: 0` → `2`)	KILLED, same 2 red
L3	tail clause re-keyed on the advisory rank (`includes(2)` → `includes(0)`)	KILLED, 2 red: `points at the findings artifact only when the deferral list is what went` + the trimmed-advisory fixture
L4	advisory rank name mangled to the observation (duplicate-key collision shape)	KILLED, same 2 red as L1
N1	R11-2: disable the body-composer gate dedup (`withoutGateReposts` → identity)	KILLED, 2 red: `does not compound the work-list or the body across rounds` + `keeps the deterministic copy, so a proven blocker pulls no verify cap`
N2	R11-2: revert dedup to whole-string match (locator → full claim)	KILLED, 1 red: `matches the locator, not the model's wording`
N3	R11-2: remove the dedup from the MARKER work-list only	KILLED, 1 red: `does not compound the work-list or the body across rounds` — the marker side alone restores compounding
N4	R11-1: never render the caveat (en+zh conditionals → `false`)	KILLED, 2 red: the truncated wiring fixture + unit `fires on a truncated predecessor, and says the reading came off one`
N5	R11-1: wire `prevTruncated` to a constant TRUE	SURVIVED — coverage gap (Findings 1); the harness `trunc-whole` cell is the fixture that kills it
N6	R11-1: validator `prevTruncated` constant TRUE (breaks absence semantics)	KILLED, 1 red: `saveReviewArtifact carries the residual-risk advisory into the artifact (#9526)`
C1	positive control in `convergence.ts`: `LAND_WITH_RESIDUAL_RISK` constant renamed	KILLED, 8 red incl. all wiring firing fixtures
C2	positive control in `compose-review.ts`: rank-2 trim name mangled	KILLED, 5 red incl. `trims the not-reviewed disclosures only after the deferral display`
C3	positive control in `save-artifact.ts`: shape-check string mangled	KILLED, 1 red: `carries the residual-risk advisory into the artifact (#9526)`

All three kill-claims in the fix-commit message reproduced (the dedup disabling, the exact-match revert, and the marker-list removal each turn the suite red), with the one exception corrected under Corrections and Findings 1: the wiring-to-a-constant claim holds only for the FALSE constant. Every surviving mutant has a positive control in the same file proving the runner can make that file's tests fail (C1–C3 all killed), and the unmutated baseline is green.

Advisory-only audit (re-run at the new head)

Production read sites of the assessment, by census (grep over packages/*/src, tests excluded): compose-review.ts (body block, composed-JSON field, terminal RESIDUAL-RISK: record at line 5618) and save-artifact.ts (validator/persistence) — unchanged set, nothing else. ReviewArtifactV1 is referenced only inside save-artifact.ts, so no code consumes the persisted residualRisk: the durable copy remains a record, not an input. All 12 event-carrying cells (every handler-mode cell except fold-stamp, which asserts body content only) assert head/prefix/base event agreement and identical cappedBy (assertEventsAgree, all passed); the fired cells add residualRisk to the JSON and a line to the terminal without touching either. The advisory prose's "the standing Critical backlog is not shrinking" remains backed wherever it can fire: prevHadCritical === true forces prevCriticals ≥ 1, so a fired advisory always measured thisCriticals >= prevCriticals ≥ 1 — and when the list it was read off is known-shortened, the paragraph now says so (R11-1).

The R11-2 cap oracle closes the other direction: a gate finding is deterministic by provenance (scriptLintGate ran the linter against a report bound to this diff's hash), so keeping the gate's copy and dropping the model's re-post BEFORE provenance is taken means a linter-proven blocker no longer pulls the criticals-unverified cap — measured in the gate-cap cell on all three arms (head: cap absent; prefix and base: cap armed).

Not covered

Per-commit attribution. Depth-2 checkout (git rev-parse --is-shallow-repository = true); git rev-list --count HEAD^1..HEAD^2 reports 1 where the metadata snapshot lists 15 commits — the shallow boundary makes the intermediate commits unreachable as graph nodes (their objects are present, which is what enabled the 6fa3e76e pre-fix arm, but rev-list cannot walk them). The aggregate HEAD^1..HEAD diff (8 files) is what was verified; this round's delta commits (6fa3e76e, ad569092be) were each exercised through their own cells and mutants.
Upstream trigger chain. The harness reproduces the wire shape: carried-ledger side files exactly as pr-context writes them (including foreign/merged/dropped), script-lint reports bound to a real diff hash. Recovery of markers from real posted GitHub comments was traced in code, not driven end to end — no GitHub token exists in this sandbox by design.
Overflow sizing is synthetic. Blockers are 'B'.repeat(n); the ORDER assertions (which ranks drop, what the notice names, what survives, the tail clause) do not depend on content, but the exact thresholds do. The rank-1-alone window does not exist for the deferral-only shape in this scan (its small rank-2 disclosure always co-sheds); the combined-drop contrast was used instead and says which.
Repo-wide gates. Only the affected surfaces ran: review-dir suite on head and base arms, core SKILL.test.ts on both arms, ESLint on the six touched cli files (liveness probe caught the planted violation and was removed clean), npm run typecheck clean repo-wide (all 11 workspaces incl. cli and core, exit 0, zero errors). Other workspaces' suites were not run — the effective diff touches nothing outside packages/cli/src/commands/review/ and the bundled skill page. Main-side changes riding in the 6fa3e76e merge are base content for this PR, not verified here.
Both arms drove TypeScript source via tsx (symmetric runner). The head's compiled dist/ was separately confirmed to contain the wiring (RESIDUAL-RISK ×3, withoutGateReposts ×3, prevTruncated in all three dist files).
The observation-side handling of truncated lists (diagnoseConvergence qualifies its own recurrence reading on the same truncated fact — the precedent R11-1 follows) is feat(review): tell the author why a review loop is not settling #9461's surface; verified only insofar as the trunc-caveat prefix arm shows it present before this commit.
Flakiness gate runs in the workflow proper; the A/B harness ran three full iterations, and the final one's 319 assertions are the reported set.

Methodology

Ran in the CI verify container (node:22-bookworm, Node v22.23.2) on the merge-ref checkout (HEAD = merge commit, HEAD^1 = base tip 7f2c4416, HEAD^2 = verified head ad569092be). Three arms: the head tree, a git worktree at HEAD^1 (base), and — because R11-2 fixes a regression the PR's own d72287cc introduced — a third worktree at the pre-fix merge 6fa3e76e (its objects are present at the shallow boundary though rev-list cannot walk them). Both auxiliary trees reused the head dependency tree: root and package-local node_modules symlinked, workspace dist/ dirs symlinked for packages the PR does not touch, packages/cli/src/generated/git-commit.ts copied; control purity asserted by realpath (node_modules/@qwen-code/qwen-code-core → head packages/core, whose only PR change is the bundled skill page — the sole core import on the driven path is atomicWriteFileSync, save cells only), and each tree's vitest aliases core to its OWN source. Targeted gates first (review-dir suite on both arms, core SKILL.test.ts on both arms, ESLint with a planted-violation liveness probe, typecheck). The A/B harness (harness/run-cell.mts, driven by harness/ab-harness.mjs) ran 20 cells × 3 arms through the real composeReviewCommand.handler / composeReview / scriptLintGate / parseLedger / saveReviewArtifact via tsx — each cell in its own temp dir with real plan/ledger/comments/report files, clean HOME, empty GH_TOKEN, no mocks of PR code; overflow cells sized their blockers by stepped scan on head and replayed the identical size on prefix and base. The mutation matrix (harness/mutation-matrix.mjs) applied 19 single-point string substitutions (each verified unique in-file before running), ran the 3-file scoped suite per mutant, restored via git checkout HEAD --, and verified git status --porcelain clean after every row (all rows restoredClean=true). Raw per-cell logs live under harness/cells/<arm>/<cell>/ (result.json, stdout.log, stderr.log); harness console logs under logs/.

Flakiness gate log


rounds=5 files=4 skipped=0
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts
file packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: (cd packages/core) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts


per-file results (P=pass F=fail I=infra-exit, one letter per run):
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: PPPPP

verdict: pass
summary: 4 changed test file(s) x 5 identical rounds, no divergence

--- per-invocation detail (full copy in the artifact) ---
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/lib/convergence.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/commands/review/save-artifact.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/core/src/skills/bundled/review/SKILL.test.ts: P (exit 0)

Evidence images

Harness scripts and raw logs are in the workflow run artifacts (7-day retention).

— Qwen Code · sandboxed verification

qwen-code-ci-bot

LGTM, looks ready to ship. ✅

doudouOUC

Re-review at `ad569092` — the four Criticals raised since my last pass are fixed; approving

I reviewed this substantively at 59f6489e9d (the fresh-window + backlog-veto round) and found it sound. So rather than re-derive the whole diff, I took the delta since then: four Criticals were raised and closed in that span, two of them in this head commit. I checked each against the code, plus re-confirmed the one property the whole design rests on now that the diff has grown.

The four Criticals since `59f6489e`

R8-1 — the posture-change guard paired two different floor readings. Fixed, and the direction is better than either remedy offered. Rather than restamping the marker from the enforcement reading — which would have relocated the same cross-reading defect into the sibling diagnosis — the guard now asks for positive evidence: if (prevPostedSuggestion === true) return null, with the reasoning in place beside it ("a c STAMP is not proof the floor enforced… A Suggestion in the predecessor's work-list is the proof, and it says the floor did not"). A stamp that can be folded from a missing floor is no longer load-bearing.

Pure-foreign predecessor work-list. Fixed, and gated wider than the report asked: prevHadCritical, prevPostedSuggestion, prevCriticals and prevTruncated all carry !pureForeignPrev. Taking the wide gate is right — prevPostedSuggestion reads absence, and a stranger's Critical-only list is exactly the shape that reads as "the floor was enforcing".

R11-1 — facts read off a possibly-truncated list, in the firing direction. Resolved by disclosure rather than suppression, and I think that is the correct call for this signal: a completeness gate would silence the advisory on precisely the deep-work-list rounds the byte budget shortens, which are the rounds it exists for. What matters is that the claim was corrected too. The block comment no longer asserts a blanket "every input degrades open" — it now reads "WITH ONE EXCEPTION, stated here because a blanket claim is the kind of false record this module polices" and names the two absence-derived readings. prevTruncated rides as a non-conjunct and the paragraph qualifies itself in both languages, naming the two readings explicitly rather than gesturing at uncertainty:

— though the previous round's work list was truncated to fit the marker, so "the backlog is not shrinking" and "the floor was enforcing" are both read off a list known to be incomplete

R11-2 — a gate Critical compounding across rounds. Fixed, and the two load-bearing details hold. withoutGateReposts matches on the gate line's locator rather than the whole string, which is the right key: a re-post is model prose that carries the entry forward without reproducing the message byte-for-byte, so an exact-match rule would stop deduping the moment wording drifted. And the ordering is genuinely as claimed — I read it rather than trusting the note:

const gate = input.planPath ? scriptLintGate(input.planPath) : …;
const ownAfterGateDedup = withoutGateReposts(bodyCriticals, gate.criticals);
bodyCriticals.length = 0;
bodyCriticals.push(...ownAfterGateDedup);
const modelBodyCriticals = [...bodyCriticals];   // captured AFTER the dedup

That is what stops the dropped re-post from still pulling the unverified-blocker cap through criticalsNeedingVerify — [lint] is not in DETERMINISTIC_TAG_RE, so fixing only the rendering would have left a linter-proven blocker capping the verdict every round.

Re-confirmed at the grown diff

Advisory-only still holds. Every cappedBy.push site sits above the line where residualRisk is computed, and all eleven references to it are rendering, the returned result, the terminal line, or persistence — nothing in the event or cap path reads it. That was the safety premise of my earlier pass and it survives the additions.

One direction changed since I last looked, and it is justified. residualRisk is now persisted rather than omitted from PersistedVerdict. The rationale is recorded where it belongs: rank 2 sheds before the not-reviewed disclosures, so the rounds that fire this are the long rounds whose body is most likely to drop it, leaving the durable record as the only place the facts survive. The validator earns it — object(), shape pinned, recommendation pinned to the single issued code, all three counts through volumeOf, and prevTruncated reading absence as "not disclosed" so an older artifact is not refused. That also answers the minor observation I left open last round about volumeOf covering all three counts: the comment now states why that boundary uses the ledger's own reader.

House style is clean; CI is green; MERGEABLE.

One nit, non-blocking

compose-review.ts:2596 carries the trailing comment // input's, captured before the gate, two lines below a block comment that says "The gate runs BEFORE that capture." Both are describing something true — the capture excludes the gate's own criticals, and it follows the gate call — but read together they contradict each other at exactly the seam R11-2 was about. Worth a word change while it is fresh; this file's recent history is mostly comments that stopped matching their code.

Where I land

Approving. Every Critical raised since my last substantive pass is closed against the code, the two that were resolved by argument rather than by suppression corrected their own claims instead of leaving an absolute I could not verify, and the advisory-only invariant still holds.

Not verified by me this round: I did not re-run the suites here (no node_modules in this worktree — CI is green, and I ran 562 of them on the earlier head). My evidence is the four fixes traced at this head plus the cap/event path re-walked.

qwen-code-ci-bot · 2026-08-26T13:30:02Z

Released in v0.22.2.

github-actions Bot added the review/self-reported The linked issue was opened by the PR author (self-reported) label Aug 20, 2026

qwen-code-ci-bot approved these changes Aug 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

qwen-code-ci-bot requested changes Aug 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

qwen-code-dev-bot added the autofix/takeover Summon the autofix loop to manage this PR (remove to release; needs triage+) label Aug 20, 2026

qwen-code-dev-bot mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2026

Fleet Shepherd Dashboard #7167

Open

fix(review): surface the convergence advisory on every reachable even…

1d293d8

…t, gated on floor engagement (#9526) Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com>

Merge branch 'main' into review-converge-residual-risk

d295c94

qwen-code-ci-bot reviewed Aug 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts Outdated

Comment thread packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts Outdated

Comment thread packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.test.ts

Comment thread packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts Outdated

qwen-code-ci-bot requested changes Aug 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts Outdated

Comment thread packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts Outdated

qwen-code-ci-bot reviewed Aug 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts Outdated

qwen-code-ci-bot previously approved these changes Aug 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

qwen-code-ci-bot requested changes Aug 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts Outdated

doudouOUC reviewed Aug 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

qwen-code-ci-bot reviewed Aug 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

qwen-code-ci-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2026

verify evidence for PR #9526 (run 32571930311)

27a4404

qwen-code-ci-bot approved these changes Aug 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

qwen-code-ci-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2026

verify evidence for PR #9526 (run 32579153320)

dea6973

qwen-code-ci-bot requested changes Aug 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts

Comment thread packages/cli/src/commands/review/compose-review.ts

wenshao added 2 commits August 23, 2026 10:12

qwen-code-ci-bot reviewed Aug 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

qwen-code-ci-bot approved these changes Aug 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

qwen-code-ci-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2026

verify evidence for PR #9526 (run 32621280670)

4a15f14

doudouOUC approved these changes Aug 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

wenshao added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 23, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit f877fb3 Aug 23, 2026
130 of 131 checks passed

qwen-code-dev-bot mentioned this pull request Aug 23, 2026

feat(review): say when the approach, not the patch, is the open question #9340

Merged

qwen-code-ci-bot mentioned this pull request Aug 25, 2026

feat(review): warn when a subsystem's Criticals keep regrowing across rounds #10010

Open

This was referenced Aug 26, 2026

review autofix: consume the machine-readable convergence signals — an off-ramp for the takeover loop #10107

Open

feat(autofix): consume the review convergence signals — a circuit breaker for the takeover loop #10122

Open

Uh oh!

Conversation

wenshao commented Aug 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What this PR does

Why it's needed

Reviewer Test Plan

How to verify

Evidence (Before & After)

Tested on

Environment

Risk & Scope

Linked Issues

这个 PR 做了什么

为什么需要

评审者测试计划

如何验证

证据（前后对比）

测试环境

环境（可选）

风险与范围

关联 issue

Uh oh!

qwen-code-ci-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

qwen-code-ci-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

qwen-code-ci-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Code review (re-run, head ad56909)

CI test evidence (PR's own checks on the reviewed commit, via API)

代码审查（re-run，head ad56909）

CI 测试证据（经 API 读取该提交自身的 CI）

Uh oh!

qwen-code-ci-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Code Coverage Summary

Uh oh!

qwen-code-ci-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

wenshao commented Aug 20, 2026

Uh oh!

qwen-code-dev-bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Uh oh!

qwen-code-dev-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

qwen-code-dev-bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Round 1 — address-review for PR #9526

Critical

Suggestions addressed

Deferred to the next round (recorded, not dropped)

Verification

第 1 轮 — PR #9526 的 address-review

Critical

已处理的 Suggestion

延后到下一轮（已记录，不丢弃）

验证

Uh oh!

qwen-code-ci-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

wenshao commented Aug 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

qwen-code-ci-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

qwen-code-ci-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

qwen-code-ci-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Code review (re-run, head `ad56909`)

代码审查（re-run，head `ad56909`）

qwen-code-ci-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Aug 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

qwen-code-dev-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

qwen-code-ci-bot commented Aug 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading