fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome

[wenshao]

What this PR does

When the growth brake fires, feedback.md tells the address agent to stop BLOCKED with a handoff — but the round's output contract only accepted address-summary.md or no-action.md. A round that followed the instruction died as "finished without required output file(s)", the brake's decision text was buried under a generic failure.md, the PR comment reported "could not produce a passing fix", and the failed job left a red review-address check that the next scan counts as new feedback. This PR makes the handoff a first-class round outcome, end to end:

• The agent runner honors an agent-written handoff.md (with no fix verdict present) as a graceful exit, the same standing failure.md already has, and shields it from the API-error retry reclassification; a coexisting address-summary.md/no-action.md still outranks it.
• The verification gate reports outcome=handoff for a no-commit round with a handoff and no failure.md — crash paths (harness death, pre-verdict failure.md) keep the failed classification.
• Finalize lets handoff pass without failing the job, so no red check is left for the next scan to re-ingest as feedback.
• The report step runs for this outcome, posts the handoff note with the eval marker (the watermark advances — the feedback is consumed as evaluated, exactly as a failure.md handoff consumes it today), and names the stop honestly instead of reporting it as a failed fix; the stale-base retry is skipped (there is no fix to re-attempt).
• The skill tells the agent exactly which file to write when the brake fires (handoff.md, English-only, no details block, nothing else), closing the instruction gap that left rounds 6/7 of fix(review): normalize last-gate inputs and anchor mid-line fragments #9222 writing nothing at all.

Why it's needed

Observed live on #9222: rounds 6 and 7 each ended with "Autofix agent finished without required output file(s)" after the agent correctly stopped BLOCKED — defer-to-human under the brake. The loop reported the brake's decision as a failure, hid the handoff content, and each failed round became new feedback for the next scan.

Reviewer Test Plan

How to verify

The decision matrix was exercised through the real harness with a stub agent binary (--qwen-bin pointed at a script that stages files and exits 0):

1. Agent writes only handoff.md → exit 0, "Autofix agent wrote handoff.md:" + content, no failure.md written (previously exit 1).
2. Agent writes nothing → exit 1 with the unchanged "required output file(s)" failure (crash semantics preserved).
3. Agent writes address-summary.md → exit 0, unchanged.
4. Agent writes address-summary.md + handoff.md → the work verdict outranks the handoff, exit 0.
5. Agent writes failure.md → graceful handoff, unchanged.

The gate's no-commit branch was executed as-is against fixture workdirs: handoff-only → outcome=handoff; handoff + failure.md → failed; no-action → noop; handoff + no-action → handoff; nothing → failed. node --check, bash -n (including the extracted workflow run blocks), and yamllint all clean.

Evidence (Before & After)

Before (#9222 rounds 6/7, runs 31926015221 / 31927942051): agent result Outcome: BLOCKED — defer-to-human → "Autofix agent finished without required output file(s): address-summary.md, no-action.md" → "Could not produce a passing fix for this feedback … needs a human", handoff content never posted. After (stub harness): the same stop exits cleanly, the gate says outcome=handoff, and the report headline is "AutoFix stopped this item under instruction and deferred it to a human" with the handoff note as the comment detail.

Tested on

OS	Status
🍏 macOS	✅
🪟 Windows	⚠️
🐧 Linux	⚠️

Environment (optional)

Local stub-agent harness on macOS; the runner-side behavior (comment + marker posting) takes effect on the next real brake-triggered round in CI.

Risk & Scope

• Main risk or tradeoff: a handoff round now ends GREEN. The loop cannot go silent on it — the report step is explicitly triggered for outcome=handoff and posts the handoff comment plus the eval marker, and the consecutive-failure breaker still counts the round toward its cap (with wording updated to name stops under instruction), so a persistently stuck PR still goes terminal with the split/reduce advice.
• Not validated / out of scope: the runner-side comment posting for this outcome will be exercised by the next real brake round; the sibling issue-fix job's report step is deliberately untouched (its mode never produces a handoff outcome).
• Breaking changes / migration notes: none — existing verdicts (fixed, noop, failed) and all crash/retry paths behave exactly as before.

Linked Issues

Root cause identified while diagnosing the #9222 takeover loop (rounds 6/7).

中文说明

这个 PR 做了什么

growth brake 触发时，feedback.md 要求 address agent 以 handoff 形式 STOP BLOCKED——但轮次输出契约只接受 address-summary.md 或 no-action.md。照做的轮次以 "finished without required output file(s)" 死掉，brake 的决策文本被通用 failure.md 盖住，PR 评论报告 "could not produce a passing fix"，失败 job 留下红色 review-address check，下一次扫描又把它当成新反馈。本 PR 把 handoff 变成端到端的一等轮次结果：

• agent runner 把 agent 自己写的 handoff.md（且无任何 fix verdict）当作优雅退出，与 failure.md 同级，并免除 API-error 重试误分类；共存 address-summary.md/no-action.md 仍然优先。
• 验证门对"无提交 + 有 handoff + 无 failure.md"的轮次报告 outcome=handoff——崩溃路径（harness 死亡、verdict 前 failure.md）保持 failed 分类。
• finalize 放行 handoff，job 不再失败，不再留下被下次扫描重新摄入的红色 check。
• 报告步骤对该 outcome 运行：发布 handoff 说明与 eval 标记（watermark 前进——反馈按"已评估"消费，与今天 failure.md handoff 的消费方式一致），如实说明这是受指令停止而非修复失败；跳过 stale-base 重试（无修复可重试）。
• skill 明确告知 brake 触发时该写哪个文件（handoff.md，纯英文、无 details 块、不写其他文件），堵上让 fix(review): normalize last-gate inputs and anchor mid-line fragments #9222 第 6/7 轮什么都没写的指令缺口。

为什么需要

#9222 实测：第 6/7 轮 agent 按 brake 正确 STOP BLOCKED — defer-to-human，却以 "Autofix agent finished without required output file(s)" 收场；循环把 brake 决策报成失败、隐藏 handoff 内容，且每个失败轮次都变成下次扫描的新反馈。

审阅者测试计划

如何验证

决策矩阵已用 stub agent 二进制驱动真实 harness 验证（--qwen-bin 指向一个摆放文件后 exit 0 的脚本）：

1. 只写 handoff.md → exit 0，打印 handoff 内容，不写 failure.md（此前 exit 1）。
2. 什么都不写 → exit 1，"required output file(s)" 失败语义不变（崩溃路径保留）。
3. 写 address-summary.md → exit 0，不变。
4. 同写 address-summary.md + handoff.md → 工作 verdict 优先，exit 0。
5. 写 failure.md → 优雅 handoff，不变。

验证门的无提交分支按原样对 fixture workdir 执行：仅 handoff → outcome=handoff；handoff + failure.md → failed；no-action → noop；handoff + no-action → handoff；无文件 → failed。node --check、bash -n（含抽取的 workflow run 块）、yamllint 全部干净。

证据（前后对比）

修复前（#9222 第 6/7 轮，runs 31926015221 / 31927942051）：agent 结果 Outcome: BLOCKED — defer-to-human → "finished without required output file(s)" → "Could not produce a passing fix … needs a human"，handoff 内容从未发布。修复后（stub harness）：同样的停止干净退出，门报告 outcome=handoff，报告标题为 "AutoFix stopped this item under instruction and deferred it to a human"，handoff 说明作为评论详情。

测试环境

操作系统	状态
🍏 macOS	✅
🪟 Windows	⚠️
🐧 Linux	⚠️

运行环境（可选）

macOS 本地 stub-agent harness；runner 侧行为（评论 + 标记发布）在 CI 下一次真实 brake 轮次生效。

风险与范围

• 主要风险或权衡：handoff 轮次现在以 GREEN 结束。循环不会因此沉默——报告步骤被 outcome=handoff 显式触发，发布 handoff 评论与 eval 标记；连续失败断路器仍把该轮计入上限（措辞已更新以点名受指令停止），持续卡住的 PR 仍会终态化并给出拆分/瘦身建议。
• 未验证 / 范围之外：该 outcome 的 runner 侧评论发布将由下一次真实 brake 轮次验证；姊妹 issue-fix job 的报告步骤刻意未动（其模式不产生 handoff outcome）。
• 破坏性变更 / 迁移说明：无——既有 verdict（fixed/noop/failed）与所有崩溃/重试路径行为完全不变。

关联 Issue

诊断 #9222 takeover 循环（第 6/7 轮）时定位的根因。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

✅ Qwen Triage finished — view run. See the stage comments in this thread for the result.

✅ Qwen Triage 已完成 —— 查看运行。结果见本线程中的各阶段评论。

[wenshao]

@qwen-code /takeover

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤝 Takeover engaged: the autofix loop now manages this PR — it will address new review feedback and resolve base conflicts until the label is removed or the round cap is reached. This is a fork PR, so the first round comes from the next scheduled scan (usually within minutes). Remove the autofix/takeover label (or comment @qwen-code /takeover stop) to release.

中文说明

🤝 已接管：autofix 循环现在管理此 PR —— 将持续处理新的评审反馈与 base 冲突，直到移除标签或达到轮次上限。本 PR 来自 fork，首轮处理将由下一次定时扫描执行（通常几分钟内）。移除 autofix/takeover 标签（或评论 @qwen-code /takeover stop）即可释放。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Re-run on the author's /triage request. Since the last pass (reviewed at 8972874) the branch only merged origin/main — and one of those merges shrank the PR: #9517 deleted the recovery clone from main, this branch absorbed the deletion, and the diff dropped from 14 files to the 6 that are the actual change. Full re-gate at the new head, not a rubber stamp.

Template ✓ — all sections present, fully bilingual.

Problem: observed, not theoretical. Rounds 6/7 of #9222 died as "Autofix agent finished without required output file(s)" after correct brake stops (runs 31926015221 / 31927942051, re-verified through the API on the prior pass). The self-feeding half holds by construction: a brake-compliant round failed the job, leaving a red review-address check the next scan counts as new feedback.

Direction: aligned — the repo's own autofix infrastructure, a contract mismatch where the skill told the agent to produce an output the harness does not accept. No product, auth, or sandbox surface. CHANGELOG: not applicable (internal tooling).

Size: no core production paths touched. 238 production lines across 4 files (gate script 62, workflow 97, runner 54, skill 25) and 639 test lines across 2 workflow-contract test files. Well under every threshold.

Approach: the prior pass's one drive-by (8 whitespace-only prettier files) is gone with the rebase; what remains is exactly the contract — one deliberate-stop outcome threaded through runner, gate, finalize, report, census, and skill, plus pinning tests. Nothing left to cut.

Risk: no elevated signals — none of the changed files match the revert-correlated high-risk paths.

Moving on to code review. 🔍

中文说明

应作者的 /triage 请求重跑。自上次审查（8972874）以来分支只合并了 origin/main——其中一次合并还让 PR 瘦身了：#9517 从 main 删除了 recovery 克隆，本分支吸收了该删除，diff 从 14 个文件降到真正构成改动的 6 个。对新 head 做完整重新把关，不是走过场。

模板 ✓——所有章节齐全，完整双语。

问题：已观测到，不是理论性的。#9222 第 6/7 轮在一次正确的 brake 停止后以 "Autofix agent finished without required output file(s)" 收场（runs 31926015221 / 31927942051，上一轮已通过 API 复核）。自反馈的一半在结构上成立：遵照 brake 的轮次会让 job 失败，留下红色 review-address check，被下次扫描计为新反馈。

方向：对齐——仓库自身的 autofix 基础设施，skill 让 agent 产出 harness 不接受的输出的契约不匹配。不涉及产品、auth 或 sandbox 面。CHANGELOG：不适用（内部工具）。

规模：未触及核心生产路径。生产逻辑 238 行、4 个文件（gate 脚本 62、workflow 97、runner 54、skill 25），workflow 契约测试 639 行、2 个文件。远低于所有阈值。

方案：上一轮指出的唯一顺手改动（8 个纯空白 prettier 文件）已随 rebase 消失；剩下的正是契约本身——一个"有意停止"结果贯穿 runner、gate、finalize、报告、统计与 skill，外加锁定测试。没有可再砍的部分。

风险：无升级信号——改动文件均未命中与 revert 相关的高风险路径。

进入代码审查 🔍

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max

_{Reviewed at 8fb2ed060ad0aec195f191ac6ac5bca3f0998865 · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Code review

Read at head 8fb2ed06 through the API (this run executes no PR code). My independent proposal for this bug — graceful-exit parity with failure.md in the runner, a gate branch classifying the no-commit stop before the structural checks, a finalize whitelist entry, a report trigger with an honest headline, and exact-file instructions in the skill — matches what this PR does; the takeover rounds threaded every shape I would have worried about next (dirt or a commit beside the handoff, a crash after it, an API-error tail reclassifying it) before I had to ask.

What I verified against the head files themselves, not just the diff:

• Gate ordering is safe. committed_rc is recorded at lines 57–58 of run-autofix-review-verification.sh, before any branch reads it, and the failure.md exits run before the three handoff branches, so crash paths keep their failed classification.
• Runner precedence is right. handoff.md is not in the address-review spec.outputs (address-summary.md, no-action.md), so it can never trip the exclusive-output check; the new exit fires only when no spec output exists, and the gate's handoff branch outranks a co-written no-action.md — a BLOCKED stop cannot close silently as "no action needed". Both sides pinned.
• Violation rejections publish green by construction. The gate exits 1 for dirty_handoff/committed_handoff, but the verify step carries continue-on-error and the finalize case whitelists both outcomes, so the job ends green and the round's own check cannot re-select the PR on the next scan — the invariant the new scan-isolation replay pins at the finalize + scan level for all three published verdicts (and keeps red for failed).
• R12-1 is stale, as the author's reply states. Verified via the API: qwen-autofix-recovery.yml is absent at this head and on current main (fix(ci): keep qwen-autofix.yml under GitHub's 500 KB start-runs limit #9517 deleted it); the new byte-identical-clone test early-returns as a dormant guard.
• :: neutralization of agent-written handoff content is present in both the runner (replaceAll) and all three gate arms (sed), pinned by injection tests on the clean-handoff arm and the runner path.

Known open items — all pre-existing on this PR, all acknowledged by the author, none blocking:

1. R14-1, the residual re-dispatch window. The scan-isolation invariant is pinned at step level; a round that goes job-red or cancelled AFTER publishing (agent-step backstop kill, an always() tail step failing after finalize, a maintainer cancel) leaves one re-dispatchable red/cancelled check per occurrence. The author's reply accepts the analysis and defers the fix to a dedicated follow-up — the suggested fix inverts crash-visibility semantics and deserves its own review budget, and the blast radius is bounded by the consecutive-failure breaker. Both maintainers approved this head after that reply. The deferral is defensible; the follow-up issue should actually be filed so the enumerated shapes don't dissolve into thread history.
2. Three Suggestion-level /review deferrals, unchanged: the dirty-handoff headline's "Nothing was committed" can under-report a commit in the commit+dirty combined shape (M14-1); committed_handoff has no behavioral runHeadline/runMark replay (M14-2); :: neutralization is unpinned on the two violation gate arms (M14-3 — the sed is present in all three arms, only the test pin is missing).

Testing evidence — the PR's own CI (this run executes nothing)

CI on the reviewed head is green. The one leg carrying this PR's ~600 lines of workflow-contract tests is Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x) — success at 8fb2ed06. The macOS/Windows test legs are skipped by the PR's self-report label (the author's stub-harness run on macOS, quoted in the PR body, is the author's claim, not this run's evidence). The two cancelled entries (route, review-pr) are superseded bot-orchestration runs from the re-trigger burst, not PR CI. No check concluded failure.

Check	Conclusion
Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)	✅ success
Classify PR	✅ success
precheck-pr / precheck	✅ success
Dependency CVE audit	✅ success
Secret scan (TruffleHog)	✅ success
Desktop Shell (ubuntu-22.04)	✅ success
Desktop Shell (windows-2022)	✅ success
web-shell E2E Smoke (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)	✅ success
Test (macos-latest / windows-latest, Node 22.x)	⏭️ skipped (self-report label)
Integration Tests (CLI, No Sandbox)	⏭️ skipped

One gap no sandboxed lane can close: the runner-side comment + marker posting for the new outcomes takes effect on the next real brake round in CI. /verify (build-level A/B) and /tmux (TUI surface) cannot exercise a workflow round, so this is a standing watch-item rather than a gap this run can fill — the posting path itself (headlines, watermark advance, POST_HANDOFF trigger, census buckets) is behaviorally replayed by the contract tests above.

中文说明

代码审查

在 head 8fb2ed06 上通过 API 阅读（本次运行不执行任何 PR 代码）。我对这个 bug 的独立方案——runner 中与 failure.md 平级的优雅退出、gate 在结构检查之前分类无提交停止、finalize 白名单、报告步骤配诚实标题、skill 给出精确到文件名的指令——与本 PR 的做法一致；此前各轮已把我接下来会担心的形态（handoff 旁有脏文件或提交、其后的崩溃、API 错误尾巴的误分类）全部穿好线。

针对 head 文件本身（而非仅 diff）核实的内容：

• gate 顺序安全。 committed_rc 在 run-autofix-review-verification.sh 第 57–58 行记录，先于任何读取它的分支；failure.md 退出先于三个 handoff 分支执行，崩溃路径保持 failed 分类。
• runner 优先级正确。 handoff.md 不在 address-review 的 spec.outputs（address-summary.md、no-action.md）里，永远不会触发互斥输出检查；新退出仅在无任何 spec 输出时触发，且 gate 的 handoff 分支优先于同写的 no-action.md——BLOCKED 停止不会静默收场为"无需改动"。两侧均有测试锁定。
• 违规拒绝按构造发布为绿色。 gate 对 dirty_handoff/committed_handoff 以 exit 1 结束，但 verify 步骤带 continue-on-error、finalize case 白名单放行这两个 outcome，job 最终为绿，本轮自己的 check 不会在下次扫描重新选中该 PR——这正是新扫描隔离回放为三个已发布 verdict 锁定的不变量（failed 保持红色）。
• R12-1 已过时，与作者回复一致。 已通过 API 核实：qwen-autofix-recovery.yml 在该 head 与当前 main 上均不存在（fix(ci): keep qwen-autofix.yml under GitHub's 500 KB start-runs limit #9517 已删除）；新增的克隆字节一致测试提前返回，作为休眠守卫存在。
• :: 中和：agent 所写的 handoff 内容在 runner（replaceAll）与 gate 三个分支（sed）中均有处理，clean-handoff 分支与 runner 路径各有注入测试锁定。

已知未决项——均为本 PR 既有、作者已确认，均不阻塞：

1. R14-1 残余重派窗口。 扫描隔离不变量锁定在 step 层；在发布报告之后 job 变红或被取消的轮次（agent 步骤 backstop 击杀、finalize 后 always() 尾步骤失败、maintainer 取消）每次会留下一个可被重派的红/取消 check。作者回复接受了分析并将修复推迟到专门的后续 PR——建议的修复会反转崩溃可见性语义，值得独立的审查预算；影响面由连续失败断路器兜底。两位 maintainer 在该回复之后批准了此 head。推迟合理；但应真正建立后续 issue，避免已枚举的形态消散在评论区历史里。
2. 三条 /review 建议级推迟项，未变：dirty-handoff 标题的 "Nothing was committed" 在"提交+脏"复合形态下可能少报一个提交（M14-1）；committed_handoff 无 runHeadline/runMark 行为回放（M14-2）；两个违规 gate 分支上的 :: 中和未锁定（M14-3——sed 在三个分支都在，只缺测试锁定）。

测试证据——PR 自己的 CI（本次运行不执行任何代码）

被审 head 上 CI 全绿。承载本 PR 约 600 行 workflow 契约测试的腿是 Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)——在 8fb2ed06 上 success。macOS/Windows 测试腿按 PR 自报标签跳过（作者在 PR 正文中引用的 macOS stub-harness 结果是作者声明，不是本次运行的证据）。两个 cancelled 条目（route、review-pr）是重触发产生的被取代的 bot 编排运行，不是 PR CI。没有任何 check 以 failure 结束。

（CI 明细表见上方英文部分。）

有一个任何沙箱通道都无法闭合的缺口：新 outcome 的 runner 侧评论 + 标记发布要在 CI 下一次真实 brake 轮次才生效。/verify（构建级 A/B）与 /tmux（TUI 面）都无法演练一个 workflow 轮次，因此这是长期观察项，而非本次运行能填补的缺口——发布路径本身（标题、watermark 前进、POST_HANDOFF 触发、统计桶）已由上述契约测试行为化回放。

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max

_{Reviewed at 8fb2ed060ad0aec195f191ac6ac5bca3f0998865 · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Confidence: 4/5 — clean re-review at the slimmer head; the one real reservation is the acknowledged R14-1 deferral, which has a name, a bound, and two maintainer approvals behind it.

Stepping back: this PR is now exactly what the first pass should have produced and nothing more — the rebase dropped the prettier drive-bys and the recovery-clone mirror alike, leaving a six-file contract change where one deliberate-stop outcome is threaded consistently through runner, gate, finalize, report, and census, with the crash paths and precedence rules matching the standing failure.md conventions instead of inventing parallel ones. The two Criticals that gated earlier rounds are both resolved: the recovery-clone drift evaporated when #9517 deleted the clone (verified at this head), and the scan-isolation residual is owned outright — the author's reply accepts the analysis, names the bounded blast radius (one re-dispatch per occurrence, breaker-capped), and defers the fix because it inverts crash-visibility semantics. That is the right call for a second-order shape: it needs a published verdict AND a job-level death in the same round, and the happy path this PR exists for — clean brake handoff, agent behaving — is green end to end and pinned by the replay tests. The two maintainers who own this infrastructure approved this exact head after reading that deferral; I'm not approving over their judgment, I'm concurring with it.

The one thing I'd ask before merge is mundane: file the follow-up issue for R14-1's shapes (agent-step backstop kill, always() tail failure, cancellation, plus the CANCELLED expression gap in the replay oracle) so the analysis lives somewhere durable. Named in the review above, not blocking.

Approving, pinned to the reviewed commit.

中文说明

置信度：4/5 —— 在瘦身后的 head 上重新审查干净；唯一的实质保留意见是已确认的 R14-1 推迟项——它有名字、有影响面上界，且已有两位 maintainer 的批准背书。

退一步看：这个 PR 现在正是首轮审查本该产出的形态，且不多不少——rebase 同时甩掉了 prettier 顺手改动与 recovery 克隆镜像，留下 6 个文件的契约改动：一个"有意停止"结果一致地贯穿 runner、gate、finalize、报告与统计，崩溃路径与优先级规则沿用既有 failure.md 约定而非另起炉灶。挡住前几轮的两个 Critical 均已解决：recovery 克隆漂移随 #9517 删除克隆而消失（已在此 head 核实）；扫描隔离残余被正面认领——作者回复接受分析、点明有界的影响面（每次发生至多一次重派，由断路器兜底），并因修复方案会反转崩溃可见性语义而将其推迟。对这个二阶形态而言这是正确的取舍：它需要同一轮里"已发布 verdict"与"job 级死亡"同时发生；而本 PR 要解决的主路径——干净的 brake handoff、agent 行为正常——端到端为绿，且有回放测试锁定。拥有这套基础设施的两位 maintainer 在读完该推迟说明后批准了这个 head；我不是越过他们的判断在批准，而是认同它。

合并前唯一想提的要求很平常：为 R14-1 的各形态（agent 步骤 backstop 击杀、always() 尾步骤失败、取消，以及回放 oracle 无法表达 CANCELLED 的缺口）建立后续 issue，让这份分析有个持久的落脚点。已在上方审查中点名，不阻塞。

批准，锁定在被审查的提交上。

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max

_{Reviewed at 8fb2ed060ad0aec195f191ac6ac5bca3f0998865 · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Not explored to full depth (tool budget reached): "agent 5": could not execute npm run test:scripts to observe the failing test live — no node_modules in the worktree or parent checkout and a full monorepo install excee….

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

未探索到全部深度（达到工具调用预算）："agent 5"：could not execute npm run test:scripts to observe the failing test live — no node_modules in the worktree or parent checkout and a full monorepo install excee…。

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.13)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🔀 Base updated: red check(s) [Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)] pass on current main — merged current main via update-branch; CI will re-run.

中文说明

🔀 已更新 base：红色检查 [Test (ubuntu-latest, Node 22.x)] 在当前 main 上通过 —— 已通过 update-branch 合入当前 main，CI 将重新运行。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

1 Suggestion-level finding(s) this review confirmed are already reported on this PR and are not repeated:

• R1-6 handoff headline matches no milestone-census needle (N_OTHER crash/infra bucket) — already reported (comment 3793791153)

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 2, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:363 — [probe] WORKDIR verdict files are plantable by the PR branch's own code (verdict steering)
• .qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs:600 — [probe] Agent-written handoff.md is not preserved on a nonzero qwen exit (asymmetric with failure.md)
• .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:363 — [probe] Handoff classification unreachable on the repair pass (unpushed first-pass commit)

中文说明

本轮确认的 1 条建议级发现已在 PR 上报告过，不再重复发布（列表见上方英文部分）。

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

收敛姿态下延后（第 2 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 3 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.13)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

⚠️ AutoFix round 13 ended without publishing a report — view run.

中文说明

⚠️ AutoFix 第 13 轮结束但未发布报告 —— 查看运行。

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 1/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 1/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

AutoFix round summary — review feedback addressed

This round addressed all 16 inline findings (10 distinct, 6 round-2 re-reports) from the automated review of the handoff output-contract PR. Commit: fix(autofix): align the handoff outcome's consumers and pins with its contract (#9297).

Critical findings — resolved

1. Stale breaker-headline pin (R1-1, rc:3793791138, rc:3794721868) — Reproduced at head: scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js pinned the old 'consecutive rounds that failed to push' wording the PR reworded, failing test:scripts deterministically. Updated the pin to the new wording 'consecutive rounds that pushed nothing', which still discriminates against the timeout breaker's phrasing.
2. Unclassified handoff headline (R1-2, rc:3793791142) — Reproduced at head: the fleet-shepherd contract test requires every HEADLINE="🤖 …" in qwen-autofix.yml to be explicitly terminal or transient. Classified the handoff headline as transient (an item-level stop with the loop still engaged, same class as 'Could not produce a passing fix'). This required the companion R1-10 fix below, because the test asserts transient headlines do NOT match the shepherd's terminal-only REASON regex.
3. Status-comment finalize misreporting (R1-3, rc:3793791143, rc:3794721870) — Reproduced by probe logic: handoff publishes a round report (the handoff note + eval marker) but the Finalize autofix status comment classifier only accepted fixed/noop, so every handoff round patched the status to "⚠️ ended without publishing a report" directly above the report it published. Added handoff to the published-report branch and updated the adjacent comment.

Suggestions — resolved

4. Precedence contradiction between runner and gate (R1-4, rc:3793791147, rc:3794721876) — The layers disagreed only in documentation, not intent: the PR's own Reviewer Test Plan states "handoff + no-action → handoff", i.e. the gate's handoff-first ordering is deliberate. Kept the gate behavior unchanged and corrected the run-agent.mjs comment, which falsely claimed a co-written spec verdict "outranks the handoff": the runner exits on the spec verdict, and the gate decides the round (handoff branch first), so a deliberate stop cannot close silently as "no action needed". The contract now has one source of truth. The new gate decision-table test pins the documented precedence behaviorally (handoff + no-action → outcome=handoff).
5. Empty-file semantics divergence (R1-5, rc:3793791149) — A 0-byte handoff.md read as a verdict in the runner (bare existsSync) but not in the gate (-s). Both handoff checks in run-agent.mjs (the exit block and the apiErrorWithoutVerdict guard) now use the file's own missing() helper, which treats zero-byte files as missing — matching the gate. Pinned on both sides: the runner treats an empty handoff.md as "no verdict" (missing-output failure), and the gate decision table asserts outcome=failed for it.
6. Handoff rounds mislabeled as crash/infra in the milestone digest (R1-6, rc:3793791153) — The handoff headline matched no census needle and fell into the residual N_OTHER bucket labeled "crash / model error / gate error / infra". Gave deliberate stops their own census needle (deferred this item to a human under instruction, cross-pinned to the headline emission site like its siblings), their own digest line in EN and ZH, and subtracted it from the residual bucket. Digest behavioral replays updated (a handoff round lands in the new bucket; a crash-heavy window keeps its 8 residual rounds).
7. :: workflow-command injection at the two new handoff echo sites (R1-7, rc:3793791156, rc:3793791160, rc:3794721885, rc:3794721889) — The gate's new cat of handoff.md and the runner's new console.error echoed agent-written content raw into the step log. Both now neutralize :: the same way the job's own 'Show run artifacts' step does (sed 's/::/;;/g' / replaceAll('::', ';;')). Pre-existing sibling echoes (failure.md/no-action.md) were left untouched — out of this finding's scope.
8. Missing test pins for the handoff chain (R1-9, rc:3793791166, rc:3794721897) — Added pins beside every existing sibling analogue: run({ FIRST_OUTCOME: 'handoff' }) in the finalize replay (green, outcome=handoff); runPostHandoff({ OUTCOME: 'handoff', JOB_STATUS: 'success' }) → 'true'; a mark/headline replay asserting watermark advance, non-terminal round, the deferral wording, and the absence of any AutoFix stopped prefix; the gate's full no-commit decision table (handoff, handoff-over-no-action, failure-over-handoff, empty handoff, no-action, nothing); three stub-runner tests (handoff exit-0, empty handoff, API-error tail vs handoff verdict); the report-step if:-clause handoff term; and the census needle↔emission cross-pins. Mutation probe: all five coordinating conditions (gate branch, finalize case arm, POST_HANDOFF clause, headline branch, runner exit block) now fail the suite when mutated, and pass restored.
9. Shepherd REASON regex collision (R1-10, rc:3793791168) — The headline began 🤖 AutoFix stopped, which the fleet shepherd's terminal-only stop-reason regex would capture for a transient stop. The finding offered two fixes; this round implements the non-colliding-prefix option (renamed to 🤖 AutoFix deferred this item to a human under instruction …) because narrowing the shepherd regex would require editing .github/workflows/qwen-fleet-shepherd.yml — area class ci-workflows, which this PR has never touched, and the gate's sensitive-area footprint rejects a round that expands into it. The rename stays inside the PR footprint; a wording-guard comment next to the headline and two test assertions pin the distinction. If a maintainer later prefers the regex-narrowing variant, the shepherd workflow edit is a one-line follow-up.

Noted, not in scope this round

• The round-2 review's three probe findings it deferred under the convergence posture (WORKDIR verdict-file planting, handoff.md preservation on nonzero qwen exit, handoff classification on the repair pass) remain recorded by the reviewer and were not requested this round; no action taken.
• Two unrelated environment failures observed while running the full test:scripts suite locally: install-script.test.js > does not package audio-capture test artifacts (missing packages/audio-capture/dist native build in this checkout — reproduced identically with this round's changes stashed) and verify-capture.test.js > renders 256-colour… (flaky terminal-rendering test — passes/fails intermittently on the identical tree). Neither is touched by this PR; the final full-suite run is green.

Verification

Commands actually run this round, in the workflow checkout:

• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js — failed 2 at baseline (reproducing both Criticals), 195 passed after the fixes
• npm run test:scripts — 54 files passed, 1320 passed | 16 skipped (full green on the final run)
• npm run build — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed
• npm run lint — passed
• npx prettier --check on all five changed files — passed
• Mutation probe (5 mutations applied one at a time and restored): each mutation fails its new pin; unmutated baseline passes
• Pre-round reproduction of the two Criticals and of the unrelated install-script failure via git stash — confirmed pre-existing/unrelated as described above

Integration tests after npm run bundle were not run: none of the changed behavior (workflow YAML, gate script, skill runner, scripts/tests pins) is exercised through the bundled CLI or the integration harness; test:scripts is the suite that covers it. npm run generate:settings-schema was not needed (no settings source changed).

中文说明

AutoFix 轮次总结 —— 已处理的评审反馈

本轮处理了针对 handoff 输出契约 PR 的自动评审中的全部 16 条行内发现（10 条独立发现，6 条为第 2 轮的重复报告）。提交：fix(autofix): align the handoff outcome's consumers and pins with its contract (#9297)。

严重（Critical）发现 —— 已解决

1. 过期的断路器标题固定（R1-1，rc:3793791138、rc:3794721868） —— 已在 HEAD 上复现：scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js 固定了本 PR 已改写的旧措辞 'consecutive rounds that failed to push'，导致 test:scripts 每次都确定性失败。已将固定断言更新为新措辞 'consecutive rounds that pushed nothing'，仍可与超时断路器的措辞区分。
2. 未分类的 handoff 标题（R1-2，rc:3793791142） —— 已在 HEAD 上复现：fleet-shepherd 契约测试要求 qwen-autofix.yml 中每个 HEADLINE="🤖 …" 都明确归类为终态（terminal）或瞬态（transient）。已将 handoff 标题归类为瞬态（轮次级停止、循环仍在运行，与 'Could not produce a passing fix' 同类）。这需要下面 R1-10 的配套修复，因为该测试断言瞬态标题不匹配 shepherd 的「仅终态」REASON 正则。
3. 状态评论收尾步骤误报（R1-3，rc:3793791143、rc:3794721870） —— 已通过探针逻辑复现：handoff 会发布轮次报告（handoff 说明 + eval 标记），但 Finalize autofix status comment 的分类只认 fixed/noop，导致每个 handoff 轮次都在其刚发布的报告上方把状态改成 "⚠️ ended without publishing a report"。已把 handoff 纳入「已发布报告」分支，并更新相邻注释。

建议（Suggestion）—— 已解决

4. runner 与门之间的优先级矛盾（R1-4，rc:3793791147、rc:3794721876） —— 两层的分歧只在文档表述，而非意图：PR 自己的 Reviewer Test Plan 写明 "handoff + no-action → handoff"，即门的 handoff 优先顺序是有意设计。保持门行为不变，修正了 run-agent.mjs 中错误声称同写的 spec 结论「优先于 handoff」的注释：runner 以 spec 结论退出，而由门决定轮次结果（handoff 分支在前），因此有意停止不会被悄悄以 "no action needed" 收尾。契约现在只有一个事实来源。新增的门决策表测试以行为方式固定了该优先级（handoff + no-action → outcome=handoff）。
5. 空文件语义不一致（R1-5，rc:3793791149） —— 0 字节的 handoff.md 在 runner 里被当作 verdict（裸 existsSync），在门里却不是（-s）。run-agent.mjs 中两处 handoff 检查（退出块与 apiErrorWithoutVerdict 守卫）现在都改用本文件自己的 missing() 助手——零字节文件视为缺失——与门一致。两侧都有测试固定：runner 把空 handoff.md 视为「无 verdict」（missing-output 失败），门的决策表断言其为 outcome=failed。
6. handoff 轮次在里程碑摘要中被误标为崩溃/infra（R1-6，rc:3793791153） —— handoff 标题不匹配任何清点（census）针，落入了标注为 "crash / model error / gate error / infra" 的残差 N_OTHER 桶。已为有意停止增加独立的清点针（deferred this item to a human under instruction，像其姊妹一样与标题发出点交叉固定）、中英文独立的摘要行，并从残差桶中扣除。摘要的行为重放已同步更新（handoff 轮次落入新桶；崩溃为主的窗口仍保持 8 个残差轮次）。
7. 两处新增 handoff 回显点的 :: workflow 命令注入（R1-7，rc:3793791156、rc:3793791160、rc:3794721885、rc:3794721889） —— 门新增的对 handoff.md 的 cat 与 runner 新增的 console.error 把 agent 撰写的内容原样回显进步骤日志。两处现在都以与本 job 自带 'Show run artifacts' 步骤相同的方式中和 ::（sed 's/::/;;/g' / replaceAll('::', ';;')）。既有的同类回显（failure.md/no-action.md）未改动——超出本条发现的范围。
8. handoff 链缺少测试固定（R1-9，rc:3793791166、rc:3794721897） —— 已在每个现有姊妹旁补齐固定：finalize 重放中的 run({ FIRST_OUTCOME: 'handoff' })（绿色、outcome=handoff）；runPostHandoff({ OUTCOME: 'handoff', JOB_STATUS: 'success' }) → 'true'；mark/headline 重放断言水位线前进、轮次非终态、移交措辞，且不含任何 AutoFix stopped 前缀；门的完整无提交决策表（handoff、handoff 优先于 no-action、failure 优先于 handoff、空 handoff、no-action、什么都没有）；三个 stub-runner 测试（handoff exit-0、空 handoff、API 错误尾部 vs handoff verdict）；报告步骤 if: 子句中的 handoff 项；以及清点针↔发出点的交叉固定。变异探针：全部五个协调条件（门分支、finalize case 分支、POST_HANDOFF 子句、标题分支、runner 退出块）被变异时都会使套件失败，恢复后通过。
9. shepherd REASON 正则冲突（R1-10，rc:3793791168） —— 标题原本以 🤖 AutoFix stopped 开头，会被 fleet shepherd 的「仅终态」停止原因正则捕获，而这是一个瞬态停止。该发现提供了两种修复；本轮实现了「不冲突前缀」选项（改名为 🤖 AutoFix deferred this item to a human under instruction …），因为收窄 shepherd 正则需要编辑 .github/workflows/qwen-fleet-shepherd.yml —— 其区域类别为 ci-workflows，本 PR 从未触碰过该文件，而门的敏感区域足迹会拒绝扩入该区域的轮次。改名保持在 PR 足迹之内；标题旁的措辞守卫注释与两处测试断言固定了这一区分。如果维护者之后更倾向收窄正则的方案，编辑 shepherd workflow 只需一行，可作为后续跟进。

已记录、本轮不在范围内

• 第 2 轮评审在收敛姿态下自行延后的三条探针发现（WORKDIR verdict 文件可被植入、非零 qwen 退出时 handoff.md 不被保留、repair pass 上的 handoff 分类）仍由评审方记录，本轮未要求修改；未采取行动。
• 本地运行完整 test:scripts 套件时观察到两个无关的环境性失败：install-script.test.js > does not package audio-capture test artifacts（本检出缺少 packages/audio-capture/dist 原生构建产物——将本轮改动 stash 后复现完全一致）与 verify-capture.test.js > renders 256-colour…（终端渲染 flaky 测试——在完全相同的代码树上间歇性通过/失败）。两者均与本 PR 无关；最终一次完整套件运行全绿。

验证

本轮在 workflow 检出中实际运行的命令：

• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js —— 基线失败 2 个（复现两条 Critical），修复后 195 个全部通过
• npm run test:scripts —— 54 个文件全部通过，1320 通过 | 16 跳过（最终一次运行全绿）
• npm run build —— 通过
• npm run typecheck —— 通过
• npm run lint —— 通过
• 对全部五个改动文件运行 npx prettier --check —— 通过
• 变异探针（每次应用一个变异后恢复）：每个变异都会使对应的新固定失败；未变异的基线通过
• 通过 git stash 在轮次前状态复现两条 Critical 以及无关的 install-script 失败 —— 确认均为上述的既有/无关问题

未运行 npm run bundle 之后的集成测试：本次改动的行为（workflow YAML、门脚本、skill runner、scripts/tests 固定）均不经过打包后的 CLI 或集成测试台执行；覆盖它的是 test:scripts 套件。未运行 npm run generate:settings-schema（未改动任何 settings 源）。

🧭 Gate advisory — this round modified areas outside the PR footprint (machine-measured, not agent-authored):

• scripts
  Review the expansion deliberately; the footprint gate is in advisory mode. · 本轮改动了 PR 足迹之外的区域（门自动测量，非 agent 文本），当前足迹门为 advisory 模式，请有意识地审阅该扩张。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

Not reviewed: reverse audit — stopped before round 5 by the review time budget.

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 3, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:363 — [probe] Repair-pass handoff unreachable: run-1's rejected-but-unpushed commit keeps the branch dirty, so run-2's compliant handoff classifies outcome=failed (red check re-ingested as …
• .qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs:598 — [probe] A completed agent-written handoff.md is demoted to outcome=failed when qwen dies after the write — the crash branch writes the failure.md that vetoes the gate's handoff classification…
• .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml:6579 — [review] Handoff's no-retry contract rides a single-attempt fire-and-forget comment post; one transient gh failure loses the eval marker and re-runs rounds invisibly (Push and report retries 3x)

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

未审查：反向审计——评审时间预算不足，未能开始第 5 轮。

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

收敛姿态下延后（第 3 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 3 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.13)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 2/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 2/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Round summary

Addressed all three inline findings from the automated review (rv:4951520575 posts its actionable findings as those inline comments; the review body's own disclosures — the reverse-audit gap, the actionlint limitation, and the three probes deferred under the convergence posture — are explicitly "recorded, not requested in this round" and are left untouched).

[rc:3796292508] [Critical] R3-1 — handoff classification runs after the gate's structural pre-checks — FIXED

Reproduced first: running the real gate script in a fixture repo, a compliant no-commit handoff (no round commit, only handoff.md) under a failing settings-schema check exits 1 with outcome=failed + retryable=true — the handoff branch is never reached, matching the reviewer's witness. On a no-commit round all three structural checks (core rebuild, schema, contracts) can only produce retryable rejections (no A/B baseline exists without a round commit), and the Repair deterministic rejection step would then rm -f handoff.md and run an agent whose allowlist includes git commit — committing after the brake explicitly said stop, and leaving the red check that re-selects the PR next scan.

The fix moves the no-commit handoff classification BEFORE the structural checks, right after the top-level failure.md exits (which keep their precedence: when failure.md coexists, the round keeps the failed classification). A handoff claims nothing (acted=false, deferred to a human), so the schema check's false-no-action rationale does not apply, and reject_fix's retryable/repair machinery must never engage on a round the brake told to stop. The no-op fork reverts to no-action-only classification, and the move drops the now-dead ! -s failure.md condition (the exits above enforce that precedence). The schema-check comment is updated: it now runs on every path but the no-commit handoff. Added the gate test the finding asked for: a fixture that trips the schema check with handoff.md present and no commit, expecting outcome=handoff, exit 0, and no retryable=true. This test fails on the pre-fix gate — the recorded reproduction.

[rc:3796292514] [Suggestion] R3-2 (location 1 of 2) — the gate's :: neutralization is untested — FIXED

Added the suggested row to the gate contract test (classifies an unchanged branch by its verdict files (handoff contract)): workdirFiles: { 'handoff.md': '::error::forged\n' }, asserting stdout contains ;;error;;forged and not ::error::forged, alongside the outcome=handoff assertion. The sed 's/::/;;/g' → cat mutation now fails the suite.

[rc:3796292519] [Suggestion] R3-2 (location 2 of 2) — the runner's :: neutralization is untested — FIXED

Applied the suggested change: the existing 'logs handoff.md content when the agent writes it and exits 0' test now writes the stub as '::error::forged\nneeds a maintainer decision\n' and asserts result.stderr contains ;;error;;forged and does not contain ::error::forged. Removing .replaceAll('::', ';;') from run-agent.mjs now fails the suite.

Conflict notes

None — --conflict false; no base merge performed.

Verification

Commands actually run this round:

• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts qwen-autofix-workflow -t handoff — pre-fix: 1 failed (the new gate test reproducing R3-1: expected exit 0, got 1); post-fix: 12 passed
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts qwen-autofix-workflow qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow — 196 passed (2 files)
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts package-scripts — 16 passed (also references the gate script)
• npm run build — passed (exit 0)
• npm run typecheck — passed (exit 0)
• npm run lint — passed (exit 0)
• npx prettier --check scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js — passed
• bash -n .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh — passed

Integration tests after npm run bundle: not run — the touched behavior (the gate script and run-agent.mjs handoff handling) is fully exercised by the scripts/tests harness, which runs the real gate script in a real fixture repo and the real run-agent.mjs; it is not exercised through the bundled CLI.

中文说明

本轮摘要

已处理自动审查的全部三条行内发现（rv:4951520575 以这些行内评论形式给出可执行发现；该审查正文自身的披露——反向审计缺口、actionlint 限制、收敛姿态下延后的三条探针——明确标注"已记录，本轮不要求修改"，未做改动）。

[rc:3796292508] [Critical] R3-1 — handoff 分类位于门的结构性预检之后 — 已修复

先复现：在夹具仓库中运行真实门脚本，settings schema 检查失败时，一次合规的无提交 handoff（无本轮提交、仅 handoff.md）以退出码 1 得到 outcome=failed + retryable=true——handoff 分支从未到达，与审查者的证据一致。无提交轮次中三个结构性检查（core 重建、schema、契约）只能产生可重试的拒绝（没有本轮提交就不存在 A/B 基线），随后 Repair deterministic rejection 步骤会 rm -f handoff.md 并运行允许 git commit 的 agent——在 brake 明确要求停止后反而提交，并留下使下次扫描重新选中该 PR 的红色 check。

修复：把无提交 handoff 分类移到结构性检查之前，紧跟顶层 failure.md 早退之后（优先级保留：failure.md 共存时轮次仍归为 failed 分类）。handoff 不声明任何动作（acted=false、移交人工），schema 检查防止"假 no-action"的理由在此不适用，且 reject_fix 的 retryable/repair 机制绝不应在 brake 要求停止的轮次启动。no-op 分叉恢复为仅 no-action 分类；移动的同时删除了因此失效的 ! -s failure.md 条件（上述早退已强制该优先级）。schema 检查的注释同步更新：现在它在除无提交 handoff 外的所有路径上运行。按发现要求新增门测试：夹具触发 schema 检查失败 + 存在 handoff.md 且无提交，断言 outcome=handoff、退出码 0、无 retryable=true。该测试在修复前的门上失败——已记录为复现证据。

[rc:3796292514] [建议] R3-2（位置 1/2）— 门脚本的 :: 中和无测试 — 已修复

按建议在门契约测试（classifies an unchanged branch by its verdict files (handoff contract)）中加一行：workdirFiles: { 'handoff.md': '::error::forged\n' }，断言 stdout 包含 ;;error;;forged 且不含 ::error::forged，与既有 outcome=handoff 断言并列。sed 's/::/;;/g' → cat 变异现在会使套件失败。

[rc:3796292519] [建议] R3-2（位置 2/2）— runner 侧 :: 中和无测试 — 已修复

按建议修改：既有 'logs handoff.md content when the agent writes it and exits 0' 测试现在把桩文件写为 '::error::forged\nneeds a maintainer decision\n'，并断言 result.stderr 包含 ;;error;;forged 且不含 ::error::forged。删除 run-agent.mjs 中的 .replaceAll('::', ';;') 现在会使套件失败。

冲突说明

无——--conflict false，未执行 base 合并。

验证

本轮实际运行的命令：

• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts qwen-autofix-workflow -t handoff — 修复前：1 失败（新门测试复现 R3-1：期望退出码 0，实际 1）；修复后：12 通过
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts qwen-autofix-workflow qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow — 196 通过（2 个文件）
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts package-scripts — 16 通过（该文件同样引用门脚本）
• npm run build — 通过（退出码 0）
• npm run typecheck — 通过（退出码 0）
• npm run lint — 通过（退出码 0）
• npx prettier --check scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js — 通过
• bash -n .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh — 通过

npm run bundle 后的集成测试：未运行——所触行为（门脚本与 run-agent.mjs 的 handoff 处理）由 scripts/tests 测试框架完整覆盖（在真实夹具仓库中运行真实门脚本与真实 run-agent.mjs），不经过打包 CLI。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed. Suggestions are inline.

Not reviewed: the executable-script lint — .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh: shellcheck is not installed.

Not explored to full depth (tool budget reached): "agent 4": none — nothing was cut short..

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 4, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• .qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs:528 — [probe] Crash/timeout path overlays a synthetic failure.md on an agent-written handoff
• .qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs:608 — [probe] The !hasOutputVerdict precedence guard has no test
• scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js:14019 — [probe] Breaker headline promises handoffs count toward the streak, but no test feeds one to the walker
• .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml:6753 — [probe] Handoff branch's position before the stale-base retry is unpinned by any replay

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。 建议见行内评论。

未审查：the executable-script lint — .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh: shellcheck is not installed。

未探索到全部深度（达到工具调用预算）："agent 4"：none — nothing was cut short.。

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

收敛姿态下延后（第 4 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 4 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.13)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 3/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 3/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Round summary

Both inline findings from the automated reviewer were addressed in code (commit e5a31065e7). No conflict resolution was needed. The review body's four convergence-deferred probe items were recorded by the reviewer as not requested this round and were left untouched.

[rc:3798560548] Dirty-workspace guard for the no-commit handoff — implemented

The handoff branch classified on the ref-level git diff --quiet "origin/${BRANCH}...${BRANCH}" only, which is blind to uncommitted tracked edits and untracked files — an agent that partially patches the tree against the brake and then writes handoff.md was reported as a clean deliberate stop.

Reproduced first: a new runGate test expecting exit 1 / outcome=failed FAILED on the pre-fix gate (measured exit=0, outcome=handoff) for both dirt shapes. The fix adds a guard before the handoff branch that rejects a non-empty handoff.md beside a dirty git status --porcelain, mirroring the failure.md+dirty sibling: outcome=failed, exit 1, and deliberately NO retryable flag — verified in the workflow that the repair pass keys on retryable == 'true' and deletes handoff.md before re-running the agent, so a retryable rejection here would commit against the brake. The guard prints the dirty status and the neutralized handoff content so the maintainer still sees the agent's stated reason.

[rc:3798560555] Pin for the committed-side clause — implemented

The claim is a coverage gap, not a behavior defect ("the code as written is correct; nothing keeps it so"). Confirmed by mutation: deleting the git diff --quiet clause let a committed round with handoff.md classify as outcome=handoff / exit 0. Added the suggested decision-table row (agentCommit: true + handoff.md → exit 1, outcome=failed, never outcome=handoff), and verified the row FAILS under that mutant and passes at HEAD — the clause is now pinned.

Additional pins and harness change

• New dirtyTree harness option ('tracked' / 'untracked') dirties the fixture worktree after the agent-commit phase.
• A boundary row pins that dirt WITHOUT handoff.md still takes the ordinary retryable dirty assert — the new guard has not swallowed that path.

Note on a self-inflicted intermediate failure

The first version of the fix carried the literal string retryable=true in its explanatory comment, which tripped the existing contract test that pins exactly ONE occurrence of that string in the gate script (the reject_fix emit). The comment was reworded ("a retryable rejection"), the count restored to 1, and the full file re-verified 180/180.

Observed pre-existing flake (not addressed, out of scope)

scripts/tests/verify-capture.test.js > renders 256-colour and truecolor via the default-grey fallback failed intermittently in full-suite runs. It reproduces identically with this round's changes reverted to pre-round HEAD (failed 3 of 4 isolated runs at HEAD; other isolated runs pass 23/23), so it is environment-dependent flakiness unrelated to this PR's footprint. Left for a deflake pass; not touched to keep this round scoped.

Verification

Commands actually run and their results:

• bash -n .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh — passed (after fix and after restore)
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js (touched) — 180/180 passed (pre-round file had 179 tests; +1 new test). Pre-fix reproduction: the dirty-handoff test failed on the unfixed gate exactly as the finding described (exit 0 / outcome=handoff). Mutation probe: deleting the committed-side clause made the new decision-table row fail, confirming the pin.
• npm run test:scripts — first run: 1 failed / 1321 passed, the failure being install-script.test.js > does not package audio-capture test artifacts, caused by packages/audio-capture/dist being absent in this checkout (the packaging script stats it). After npm run build produced it, that test passed in isolation. Later runs surfaced the pre-existing verify-capture.test.js flake documented above (reproduces at pre-round HEAD; unrelated to this diff).
• npm run build — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed
• npm run lint — passed
• npx prettier --check scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js — passed

中文说明

本轮摘要

自动审查者的两条行内发现均已在代码中处理（提交 e5a31065e7）。无需冲突解决。审查正文中四条按收敛姿态延后的探针条目已被审查者标注为本轮不要求修改，未做改动。

[rc:3798560548] 无提交 handoff 的脏工作区守卫 — 已实现

handoff 分支原本仅凭引用级 git diff --quiet "origin/${BRANCH}...${BRANCH}" 分类，对未提交的受跟踪修改和未跟踪文件不可见——agent 违反 brake 部分修改了树之后写 handoff.md，会被报告为干净的人为停止。

先复现后修复：新增的 runGate 测试期望 exit 1 / outcome=failed，在未修复的门脚本上失败（实测 exit=0、outcome=handoff），两种脏树形态均复现。修复方案是在 handoff 分支之前加一个守卫：非空 handoff.md 与脏 git status --porcelain 并存时拒绝，形态对齐 failure.md+脏树的同类守卫：outcome=failed、exit 1，并且刻意不带 retryable 标志——已在工作流中核实：修复通道以 retryable == 'true' 为条件，且会在重新运行 agent 前删除 handoff.md，因此此处若可重试将导致违背 brake 的提交。守卫会打印脏树状态和中和（::→;;）后的 handoff 内容，让维护者仍能看到 agent 的停止理由。

[rc:3798560555] 「已提交」侧条款的固定测试 — 已实现

该发现是覆盖缺口而非行为缺陷（「当前代码是正确的，但没有任何东西保证它继续正确」）。已通过变异确认：删除 git diff --quiet 条款后，既提交又写 handoff.md 的轮次会被分类为 outcome=handoff / exit 0。按建议新增了决策表用例（agentCommit: true + handoff.md → exit 1、outcome=failed、绝不出现 outcome=handoff），并验证该用例在该变异体上失败、在当前 HEAD 上通过——条款现已被固定。

额外固定与测试脚手架改动

• 新增 dirtyTree 脚手架选项（'tracked' / 'untracked'），在 agent 提交阶段之后弄脏夹具工作树。
• 一条边界用例固定：没有 handoff.md 时脏树仍走常规可重试脏树断言——新守卫没有吞掉该路径。

关于一次自身引入的中间失败

修复的第一版在解释性注释中带了字面串 retryable=true，触发了现有契约测试（该测试固定门脚本中该字符串恰好出现一次，即 reject_fix 的发射点）。已将注释改写为 "a retryable rejection"，计数恢复为 1，并重新验证整个文件 180/180 全绿。

观察到的既有不稳定测试（未处理，超出范围）

scripts/tests/verify-capture.test.js > renders 256-colour and truecolor via the default-grey fallback 在全套件运行中间歇性失败。将本轮改动还原到轮前 HEAD 后可同样复现（HEAD 上单独运行 4 次中失败 3 次；其余单独运行 23/23 全过），属于与本 PR 足迹无关的环境依赖型不稳定。留给 deflake 处理；为保持本轮范围未做改动。

验证

实际运行的命令及结果：

• bash -n .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh — 通过（修复后与还原后各一次）
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js（本轮改动文件）— 180/180 通过（轮前该文件 179 个测试，新增 1 个）。修复前复现：脏 handoff 测试在未修复门脚本上的失败与发现描述完全一致（exit 0 / outcome=handoff）。变异探针：删除「已提交」侧条款后新决策表用例失败，确认固定生效。
• npm run test:scripts — 首次运行：1 失败 / 1321 通过，失败为 install-script.test.js > does not package audio-capture test artifacts，原因是本检出中缺少 packages/audio-capture/dist（打包脚本会 stat 它）。npm run build 生成后该测试单独运行通过。后续运行出现上文记录的既有 verify-capture.test.js 不稳定（轮前 HEAD 可复现，与本 diff 无关）。
• npm run build — 通过
• npm run typecheck — 通过
• npm run lint — 通过
• npx prettier --check scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js — 通过

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Reviewed — no blockers. Suggestions are inline.

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 5, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• .qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs:608 — [probe] The !hasOutputVerdict precedence guard on the handoff branch has no test (mutant survives 180/180)
• .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml:6764 — [probe] Handoff headline promises the loop stays engaged, but at the round cap the next scan pauses the PR

中文说明

已审查——无阻断问题。 建议见行内评论。

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

收敛姿态下延后（第 5 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 2 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.13)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 4/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 4/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Address-review summary — PR #9297 (round 6)

One inline finding this round, plus a review body with no blockers. Conflict
flag was false; no base merge was performed.

Feedback points and decisions

[rc:3799529757] R5-1 — [Suggestion] dirty-handoff rejection reported as a failed fix → Implemented

The finding claims the dirty-handoff rejection (a brake handoff written over a
dirty workspace, introduced by this PR) reaches the maintainer disguised as a
rejected FIX: the gate exits outcome=failed without gate-rejection.md, so
the report step's failed-fix branch renders "Could not produce a passing fix …
This item now needs a human" — or, when the PR happens to be behind main, the
stale-base probe flips the headline to "AutoFix updated a stale base … will
retry on the next scan" and actually merges main for a retry that must not
happen (no fix exists to re-attempt).

Reproduced before changing anything, by executing the workflow's own
extracted report-step headline block against the dirty-handoff shape
(OUTCOME=failed, DETAIL_FILE=handoff.md, no gate-rejection.md):

• gh-api-fails arm: 🤖 Could not produce a passing fix for this feedback (round 3/5). This item now needs a human; …
• PR-behind-main arm (stubbed gh): 🤖 AutoFix updated a stale base — the fix did not pass verification, … will retry on the next scan. …

Both arms match the finding's witness. Fix (suggested shape — a dedicated
headline branch that names the brake-violating dirt and skips the stale-base
probe):

• Gate (run-autofix-review-verification.sh): the dirty-handoff branch now
  emits its own verdict outcome=dirty_handoff instead of outcome=failed.
  It stays non-retryable (no retryable=true, so the repair pass — which
  deletes handoff.md and may commit against the brake — is never engaged) and
  still exits 1, so the job remains red exactly as before.
• Report step (qwen-autofix.yml): a new elif [[ "${OUTCOME:-}" == 'dirty_handoff' ]]
  branch beside the clean-handoff branch renders an honest headline —
  "🤖 AutoFix rejected this round — the agent wrote a handoff but left a dirty
  workspace, violating the brake's commit-nothing stop …" — pointing at the
  handoff note (rendered in the comment body via DETAIL_FILE) and the run
  log (which lists the dirty files). It skips the stale-base probe entirely,
  stamps no retry sentinel (the watermark advances, so the item hands to a
  human without any automatic-retry promise), and keeps the "loop stays
  engaged" wording shared with the other terminal-per-item headlines. The
  wording guard from the handoff branch carries over: no "🤖 AutoFix stopped"
  prefix, so the fleet shepherd's terminal-stop regex does not match it (the
  shepherd contract test pins this).
• Census: the milestone digest's N_REJECTED needle now also matches the new
  headline, so the round counts as a rejected round rather than wearing the
  failed-fix label or landing in the residual crash/infra bucket.
• Status-comment finalization: dirty_handoff joins fixed/noop/handoff
  in the "published a round report" condition — the report step does post for
  this outcome, so the status comment must read "finished", not "ended without
  publishing a report" above its own report.
• Consumers checked and deliberately unchanged: final_verify's case
  fallthrough keeps the job red; POST_HANDOFF fires via JOB_STATUS != success; the report step's if: fires via failure(); the repair gate
  never sees this shape on the first pass (handoff.md presence is the trigger
  and repair deletes it up front).

Pinned by new/updated behavioral tests: gate emits the new outcome for both
dirt shapes and stays non-retryable; final_verify stays red and forwards the
outcome; the report posts under JOB_STATUS != success; watermark advances
without a sentinel; headline is honest on both gh arms; a stubbed-gh
behind-main replay proves the stale-base probe is skipped and update-branch
is never invoked; census counts the new headline as a rejected round; the
shepherd cross-pin classifies the new headline as transient and verifies it
does not match the terminal REASON regex.

[rv:4955400998] review body — COMMENTED, no blockers → No action

The review body itself carries no blockers; its actionable content was the
inline finding above. The two probe items it lists as "Deferred under the
convergence posture (round 5) — recorded, not requested in this round"
(the untested !hasOutputVerdict precedence guard in run-agent.mjs, and the
round-cap pause wording at the workflow's handoff headline) were deferred by
the reviewer itself; they are not requested this round and were left untouched.

Changes

• .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh — dirty-handoff branch
  emits outcome=dirty_handoff; comment updated.
• .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml — new dirty_handoff headline branch
  in the report step (skips the stale-base probe); census N_REJECTED needle
  extended; status-comment finalization includes the new outcome.
• scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js — gate, final-verify,
  POST_HANDOFF, watermark, headline (incl. stubbed-gh probe-skip replay), and
  census coverage for the new shape.
• scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js — new headline
  classified in the terminal/transient cross-pin (transient, 5 → 6).

Verification

Commands actually run this round, and their results:

• Reproduction probe (pre-fix, extracted report-step headline block, dirty-handoff shape) — reproduced: failed-fix headline on the gh-fails arm; stale-base retry headline on the behind-main arm.
• Post-fix probe (same block, OUTCOME=dirty_handoff) — passed: honest headline on both arms, watermark advanced (no retry sentinel), update-branch never invoked.
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js — 197 passed.
• npm run build — passed.
• npm run typecheck — passed.
• npm run lint — passed.
• bash -n .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh and a YAML parse of the workflow — passed.
• npx prettier --check on both touched test files — passed.

No settings source changed, so npm run generate:settings-schema was not
required. The touched behavior lives in the gate script and workflow report
path, which these contract tests exercise directly; it is not exercised
through the bundled CLI, so no integration run was applicable.

中文说明

处理评审总结 — PR #9297（第 6 轮）

本轮一条行内发现，外加一份无阻断问题的评审正文。冲突标志为 false；未执行 base 合并。

反馈点与决定

[rc:3799529757] R5-1 — [建议] 脏 handoff 拒绝被报告为「修复失败」→ 已实现

该发现指出：脏 handoff 拒绝（brake handoff 写在脏工作区之上，由本 PR 引入）以「被拒修复」的面貌到达维护者：门以 outcome=failed 退出且不写 gate-rejection.md，于是报告步骤走「修复被拒」分支，渲染「Could not produce a passing fix … This item now needs a human」——或者当 PR 恰好落后 main 时，stale-base 探测把标题翻转为「AutoFix updated a stale base … will retry on the next scan」，并真的为一个不存在的修复去合并 main、承诺重试。

在改动之前先复现：用从 workflow 原样抽取的报告步骤标题块，对脏 handoff 形态（OUTCOME=failed、DETAIL_FILE=handoff.md、无 gate-rejection.md）执行探针：

• gh-api 失败臂：🤖 Could not produce a passing fix for this feedback (round 3/5). This item now needs a human; …
• PR 落后 main 臂（gh 打桩）：🤖 AutoFix updated a stale base — the fix did not pass verification, … will retry on the next scan. …

两臂输出与该发现的证据一致。修复（采用其建议形态——专用标题分支点名 brake 违例的脏文件、跳过 stale-base 探测）：

• 门脚本（run-autofix-review-verification.sh）：脏 handoff 分支现在发出自己的裁决 outcome=dirty_handoff，不再是 outcome=failed。保持不可重试（不写 retryable=true，因此不会触发会删除 handoff.md 并可能违背 brake 提交的修复pass），仍以 exit 1 退出，作业与之前一样保持红色。
• 报告步骤（qwen-autofix.yml）：在干净 handoff 分支旁新增 elif [[ "${OUTCOME:-}" == 'dirty_handoff' ]] 分支，渲染如实标题——「🤖 AutoFix rejected this round — the agent wrote a handoff but left a dirty workspace, violating the brake's commit-nothing stop …」——指向 handoff 说明（经 DETAIL_FILE 渲染进评论正文）与运行日志（列出脏文件）。完全跳过 stale-base 探测，不盖重试哨兵（watermark 照常前进，事项移交人工、不承诺任何自动重试），并保留与其他「单项终止」标题一致的「循环继续托管」措辞。沿用 handoff 分支的措辞守卫：不带「🤖 AutoFix stopped」前缀，因此 fleet shepherd 的终止态正则不会匹配（shepherd 契约测试钉住该区分）。
• 统计：里程碑摘要的 N_REJECTED 针现在也匹配新标题，该轮计入「被拒轮次」，而不是戴着「修复失败」标签或落进崩溃/infra 残差桶。
• 状态评论收尾：dirty_handoff 加入 fixed/noop/handoff 的「已发布轮报告」条件——报告步骤确实会为该裁决发布，状态评论必须显示「finished」，而不是在自己的报告上方显示「ended without publishing a report」。
• 已检查且刻意不改的消费方：final_verify 的 case 兜底保持作业红色；POST_HANDOFF 经 JOB_STATUS != success 触发；报告步骤的 if: 经 failure() 触发；修复门在第一遍永远不会遇到该形态（handoff.md 存在是触发条件，而修复pass开头会删除它）。

以新增/更新的行为测试钉住：门对两种脏形态都发出新 outcome 且保持不可重试；final_verify 保持红色并转发该 outcome；报告在 JOB_STATUS != success 下照常发布；watermark 前进且无哨兵；两个 gh 臂下标题均如实；以打桩 gh 重放 behind-main 臂，证明 stale-base 探测被跳过且 update-branch 从未被调用；统计把新标题计为被拒轮次；shepherd 交叉钉把新标题归类为瞬态并验证其不匹配终止态 REASON 正则。

[rv:4955400998] 评审正文 — COMMENTED，无阻断 → 无需处理

评审正文本身无阻断问题；其可操作内容即上面的行内发现。其中列为「收敛姿态下延后（第 5 轮）——已记录，本轮不要求修改」的两个探针项（run-agent.mjs 中未测试的 !hasOutputVerdict 优先级守卫，以及 workflow handoff 标题在轮次上限处的暂停措辞）是评审者自己延后的；本轮不要求，未做改动。

变更

• .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh —— 脏 handoff 分支发出 outcome=dirty_handoff；注释更新。
• .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml —— 报告步骤新增 dirty_handoff 标题分支（跳过 stale-base 探测）；统计 N_REJECTED 针扩展；状态评论收尾纳入新 outcome。
• scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js —— 覆盖新形态的门、final-verify、POST_HANDOFF、watermark、标题（含打桩 gh 的探测跳过重放）与统计。
• scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js —— 新标题纳入终止/瞬态交叉钉（瞬态，5 → 6）。

验证

本轮实际执行的命令及结果：

• 复现探针（修复前，抽取的报告步骤标题块，脏 handoff 形态）——已复现：gh 失败臂为「修复失败」标题；behind-main 臂为 stale-base 重试标题。
• 修复后探针（同一块，OUTCOME=dirty_handoff）——通过：两臂均为如实标题，watermark 前进（无重试哨兵），update-branch 从未被调用。
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js —— 197 通过。
• npm run build —— 通过。
• npm run typecheck —— 通过。
• npm run lint —— 通过。
• bash -n .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh 及 workflow 的 YAML 解析 —— 通过。
• 对两个改动的测试文件执行 npx prettier --check —— 通过。

未改动任何 settings 源，因此无需 npm run generate:settings-schema。改动的行为位于门脚本与 workflow 报告路径，由这些契约测试直接执行；不经由打包 CLI 执行，因此不适用集成测试。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

No blocking issues. LGTM! ✅

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 6, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:92 — [probe] Dirty-handoff branch's :: workflow-command neutralization of handoff.md is untested (sed→cat mutation survives all 13 handoff tests)
• .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml:6953 — [probe] Breaker replay test has no handoff-headline fixture; the reworded cap headline's streak-counting promise is unpinned in both directions

中文说明

无阻断问题。LGTM！✅

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

收敛姿态下延后（第 6 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 2 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.13)

[wenshao]

@qwen-code /resolve

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Qwen Code attempted to resolve merge conflicts but the run did not complete successfully.

Check the workflow run for full logs.

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 5/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 5/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Autofix review round — PR #9297 (base-conflict resolution)

Feedback triage

No actionable feedback this round: feedback.md contained no reviews, inline
comments, issue-level comments, failed checks, or still-red checks newer than
the last evaluation (2026-08-17T23:29:29Z). All CI checks on the PR head were
green (14 SUCCESS, 25 SKIPPED, 0 failures). The only work item was the
requested base-conflict resolution (--conflict true).

Conflict resolution

Merged origin/main (28 commits ahead) into the PR branch. Every file
auto-merged except .qwen/skills/autofix/SKILL.md, where main's #9371 and
this PR rewrote the same "Not converging" handoff instruction in opposite
ways:

• main (fix(ci): route the autofix convergence-brake handoff through failure.md #9371) told the agent to write the convergence-brake handoff into
  failure.md and forbade handoff.md, because the then-deployed verdict
  gate did not accept an agent-written handoff.md (run 32076785809 reported
  a correct defer-to-human as "finished without required output file(s)").
• This PR makes an agent-written handoff.md the brake's first-class
  output: run-agent.mjs accepts it as a verdict (exit 0 when no spec output
  exists), and the verify gate classifies it as outcome=handoff on a clean
  tree and outcome=dirty_handoff over a dirty workspace.

Resolved in this PR's favor. #9371 is a stopgap for exactly the defect this
PR fixes at the gate level, and all of this PR's gate code merged cleanly
around the conflict — keeping the failure.md directive would route a
deliberate defer-to-human through the failure class (the misreport this PR's
final commit removes) and leave the merged gate's handoff/dirty_handoff
branches unreachable. #9371's intent (name the handoff file explicitly and
pin it in the contract test) is preserved, with the file the post-merge gate
actually accepts.

Changes

• .qwen/skills/autofix/SKILL.md — kept the branch-side "Not converging"
  bullet (handoff to <workdir>/handoff.md, English-only, nothing else
  written, commit nothing). Main's feat(autofix): seed the takeover round counter with /takeover from N #9321 takeover-counter paragraph merged in
  unchanged; no other part of the file conflicted.
• scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js — replaced fix(ci): route the autofix convergence-brake handoff through failure.md #9371's two pins
  (which asserted the now-superseded failure.md directive) with pins on the
  new contract: the skill names <workdir>/handoff.md as the brake's handoff
  target and forbids pairing the handoff with address-summary.md /
  no-action.md / failure.md.
• Merge commit 57664b92db; working tree clean, additive history only.

Observation (not acted on)

scripts/tests/verify-capture.test.js "renders 256-colour and truecolor via
the default-grey fallback" failed once in a full parallel
npm run test:scripts run but passes in isolation (23/23). The file is
byte-identical to origin/main and untouched by this merge (last changed by
#8236, before this branch), so this is a pre-existing parallel-run flake on
the base branch, outside this PR's footprint. No code changed for it.

Verification

• git merge origin/main — one conflict (.qwen/skills/autofix/SKILL.md),
  resolved as described above; merge commit 57664b92db
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js — passed (2 files, 202 tests; the touched contract tests, including the re-pinned non-convergence test)
• npm run build — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed
• npm run lint — passed
• npx prettier --check on the two touched files — passed
• npm run generate:settings-schema — ran as a consistency check; produced no diff (the merged schema is up to date, nothing committed from it)
• npm run test:scripts (full suite, beyond the required focused run) — 1326 passed, 16 skipped, 1 failed: the pre-existing verify-capture flake documented above, which passes in isolation and whose file is byte-identical to origin/main

No integration-test run: the touched behavior (autofix workflow, skill text,
gate script) is exercised by the scripts/tests contract suite, not by the
bundled CLI or the integration harness.

中文说明

Autofix 审查轮次 — PR #9297（解决与 base 的冲突）

反馈分诊

本轮没有需要处理的反馈：feedback.md 中没有任何新于上次评估时间（2026-08-17T23:29:29Z）的审查、行内评论、issue 级评论、失败检查或持续失败的检查。PR head 上的所有 CI 检查均为绿色（14 项 SUCCESS，25 项 SKIPPED，0 项失败）。本轮唯一的工作项是请求的 base 冲突解决（--conflict true）。

冲突解决

已将 origin/main（领先 28 个提交）合并进 PR 分支。除 .qwen/skills/autofix/SKILL.md 外，所有文件均自动合并成功。该文件的冲突在于：main 上的 #9371 与本 PR 以相反的方式重写了同一条 "Not converging"（不再收敛）交接指令：

• main（fix(ci): route the autofix convergence-brake handoff through failure.md #9371） 要求 agent 把收敛刹车（convergence brake）的交接写入 failure.md，并禁止写 handoff.md，原因是当时线上的裁决门（verdict gate）不接受 agent 手写的 handoff.md（run 32076785809 曾把一个正确的 defer-to-human 上报为 "finished without required output file(s)"）。
• 本 PR 让 agent 手写的 handoff.md 成为刹车的一等输出：run-agent.mjs 将其作为裁决接受（在不存在 spec 输出文件时以 exit 0 结束），验证门（verify gate）在干净工作树上将其归类为 outcome=handoff，在脏工作树上归类为 outcome=dirty_handoff。

按本 PR 的方向解决。#9371 正是针对本 PR 在门（gate）层面修复的那个缺陷的临时补救，而且本 PR 的全部门代码都在冲突区域之外干净地合并了——如果保留 failure.md 指令，将会把一个有意的 defer-to-human 路由到失败类别（正是本 PR 最后一个提交所消除的误报），并让合并后门的 handoff/dirty_handoff 分支变得不可达。#9371 的意图（明确指定交接文件名，并在契约测试中钉住）被保留了下来，只是改用合并后门实际接受的文件。

变更内容

• .qwen/skills/autofix/SKILL.md — 保留分支侧的 "Not converging" 条目（交接写入 <workdir>/handoff.md、仅英文、不写任何其他文件、不提交任何内容）。main 上 feat(autofix): seed the takeover round counter with /takeover from N #9321 的 takeover 轮次计数段落原样合入；文件其余部分无冲突。
• scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js — 替换了 fix(ci): route the autofix convergence-brake handoff through failure.md #9371 的两条钉住断言（它们断言的是已被取代的 failure.md 指令），改为钉住新契约：skill 指名 <workdir>/handoff.md 作为刹车交接目标，并禁止交接与 address-summary.md / no-action.md / failure.md 同时出现。
• 合并提交 57664b92db；工作树干净，仅使用追加式（additive）历史。

观察项（未处理）

scripts/tests/verify-capture.test.js 的 "renders 256-colour and truecolor via the default-grey fallback" 在完整的并行 npm run test:scripts 运行中失败过一次，但单独运行时通过（23/23）。该文件与 origin/main 逐字节一致，且本次合并完全没有触碰它（最后一次改动是 #8236，早于本分支），因此这是 base 分支上一个已存在的并行运行抖动（flake），不在本 PR 的足迹范围内。未为其改动任何代码。

验证

• git merge origin/main — 一个冲突（.qwen/skills/autofix/SKILL.md），按上述方式解决；合并提交 57664b92db
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js — 通过（2 个文件，202 个测试；即被触碰的契约测试，包括重新钉住的 non-convergence 测试）
• npm run build — 通过
• npm run typecheck — 通过
• npm run lint — 通过
• 对两个被触碰文件运行 npx prettier --check — 通过
• npm run generate:settings-schema — 作为一致性检查运行；无 diff 产生（合并后的 schema 已是最新，未从中提交任何内容）
• npm run test:scripts（完整套件，超出要求的聚焦运行范围）— 1326 通过，16 跳过，1 失败：即上文记录的已存在的 verify-capture 抖动，该测试单独运行通过，且其文件与 origin/main 逐字节一致

未运行集成测试：被触碰的行为（autofix 工作流、skill 文本、门脚本）由 scripts/tests 契约测试套件覆盖，而非由打包后的 CLI 或集成测试框架覆盖。

🧭 Gate advisory — this round modified areas outside the PR footprint (machine-measured, not agent-authored):

• docs
• packages/cli
• packages/web-shell
  Review the expansion deliberately; the footprint gate is in advisory mode. · 本轮改动了 PR 足迹之外的区域（门自动测量，非 agent 文本），当前足迹门为 advisory 模式，请有意识地审阅该扩张。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: conflicted with main — resolved in this push. · 与 main 有冲突——已在本次推送中解决。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Sandboxed verification: ⚠️ incomplete — infrastructure failure - workflow run

The verification job did not complete (checkout, runner, or setup error) and produced no report. See the workflow run for details.

中文 — 判定：⚠️ 未完成 · 基础设施故障

验证作业未完成（检出、runner 或初始化错误），未生成报告。详见工作流运行日志。

— Qwen Code · sandboxed verification

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

LGTM, looks ready to ship. ✅

[wenshao]

@qwen-code /resolve

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Qwen Code attempted to resolve merge conflicts but the run did not complete successfully.

Check the workflow run for full logs.

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

Not reviewed: the executable-script lint — .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh: shellcheck is not installed.

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 11, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:89 — [probe] compound brake violation (commit + dirt) misreports as "Nothing was committed"
• scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js:16547 — [probe] committed_handoff headline dispatch branch has no behavioral replay pin
• .qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs:176 — [review] writeHandoff guard hand-rolls the missing() verdict predicate
• .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:123 — [probe] no-commit handoff guard re-forks git diff instead of reusing committed_rc

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

未审查：the executable-script lint — .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh: shellcheck is not installed。

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

收敛姿态下延后（第 11 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 4 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

5 Suggestion-level finding(s) this review confirmed are already reported on this PR and are not repeated:

• D12-1 dirty_handoff headline "Nothing was committed" is false for the commit+dirty combined shape — already reported (round-8 deferral list, review 4962266599; re-confirmed round 10, reviews 4966757150 / 4965664755; round-11 deferral list, …
• D12-2 writeHandoff guard hand-rolls the missing() verdict predicate — already reported (round-11 deferral list, review 4969912763)
• D12-3 published-verdict classification re-enumerated at five consumer sites instead of emitted once by the gate — already reported (round-10 deferral list, review 4966757150)
• D12-4 committed_handoff headline dispatch branch has no behavioral replay pin — already reported (round-10 deferral list, review 4965664755; round-11 deferral list, review 4969912763)
• D12-5 the !hasOutputVerdict precedence guard (spec output outranks handoff.md) has no test — already reported (round-4/5/7/9 deferral lists, reviews 4954292868 / 4955400998 / 4959573013 / 4964190737)

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

本轮确认的 5 条建议级发现已在 PR 上报告过，不再重复发布（列表见上方英文部分）。

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 9/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 9/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Autofix round summary

Critical-only mode is active (round threshold engaged). Only the Critical finding was actionable this round; the deferred non-Critical section was left untouched as an audit record.

[rc:3815025401] Critical R12-1 — recovery clone drifts from the shared gate contract → FIXED

Reproduced before changing anything (probe running each file's verbatim Finalize verification case at HEAD):

original@HEAD finalize: {"fixed":0,"noop":0,"handoff":0,"dirty_handoff":0,"committed_handoff":0,"failed":1}
clone@HEAD    finalize: {"fixed":0,"noop":0,"handoff":1,"dirty_handoff":1,"committed_handoff":1,"failed":1}
clone report-step if: handoff clauses = false | POST_HANDOFF = pre-PR shape | N_HANDOFF = false | handoff headlines = false

The clone (qwen-autofix-recovery.yml) stages and executes the SAME updated gate script (cp .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh at ~4512, invocations at ~5928/~6102), so post-merge every handoff/dirty_handoff/committed_handoff round it runs would fall through its pre-PR fixed|noop) finalize case to *) exit 1 → red check after the eval marker → N_FAILED_CHECKS re-dispatch, exactly the self-feeding loop the finding describes.

Fix (mirrored, not re-derived): applied the PR's own consumer hunks from qwen-autofix.yml verbatim to qwen-autofix-recovery.yml — finalize case, milestone census (N_REJECTED regex + N_HANDOFF bucket + printf wording), report-step if: outcome clauses, POST_HANDOFF condition, the three headline branches, and the status-comment outcome list. After the mirror the clone is byte-identical to the updated original except its two documented comment blocks (its RECOVERY CLONE header and the original's entity-specific no-op re-parse touch), verified with diff. Deleting the clone was the suggested alternative, but its deletion condition ("once the original entity schedules and executes runs normally again") is external GitHub Actions state this round cannot verify — deleting the live executor on an unverified premise risks stopping the loop entirely, so mirroring is the safe fix.

Pin added: a new test asserts the clone stays byte-identical to the original modulo those two comment blocks (it early-returns if the clone file is deleted per its own header). The finding's core complaint — "no test pins the two workflows together, so nothing catches the drift" — is what this test exists for. Gate requirement verified: it FAILS against the pre-round tree (drift present at HEAD) and passes after the mirror.

[rc:3810626994] finalize/report/POST_HANDOFF admit the handoff outcomes → VERIFIED, already fixed at head

Re-verified the claim by probe at HEAD: the original's finalize case exits 0 for handoff/dirty_handoff/committed_handoff (1 only for failed), the review-address report step's if: carries all three outcome clauses, and POST_HANDOFF keys on all three outcomes. Streak protection is pinned by the passing suite (violation headlines match no reset needle). No code change needed; the underlying finding stays resolved.

[rc:3810627250] crash branch preserves an agent-written handoff → VERIFIED, already fixed at head

Re-verified structurally and by tests: the crash branch checks hasHandoffVerdict and exits 0 before synthesizing anything; the loopDetected arm is reached only when no agent handoff exists; every writeHandoff call site is additionally guarded by the function's own non-empty-file no-overwrite check. The three pinning tests named in the comment — 'preserves an agent-written handoff when qwen dies after it', '...when the budget kills qwen after it', '...across the loop guard' — plus the 'never overwrites' sibling all pass at HEAD. No code change needed; the underlying finding stays resolved.

[rv:4974670421] CHANGES_REQUESTED review

The review's only fresh finding is R12-1 (handled above via its inline thread rc:3815025401). Its five Suggestion-level findings (D12-1…D12-5) are confirmed duplicates of items already on the deferred non-Critical lists from earlier rounds — untouched this round per Critical-only mode.

Conflict

--conflict false — no base merge performed.

Verification

• Reproduction probe (each file's verbatim finalize case replayed under bash per outcome, plus static consumer-clause checks): REPRODUCED pre-fix (clone exit 1 on all three handoff outcomes, consumers absent), NOT reproduced post-fix (clone exit 0, all consumers present) — passed
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js -t 'keeps the recovery clone byte-identical' against the pre-round clone — 1 failed (drift visible, as the verification gate requires)
• Same command against the post-fix tree — 1 passed
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js (touched areas) — 2 files, 209 passed
• npx prettier --check scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js — passed
• npx eslint scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js — passed
• npm run build — passed (exit 0)
• npm run typecheck — passed (exit 0, all 9 workspaces + example)
• npm run lint — passed (exit 0)

Commit: fix(ci): mirror the handoff outcome consumers into the recovery clone (#9297) (2 files, +102/−13).

中文说明

Autofix 轮次总结

当前处于仅处理 Critical 的模式（轮次阈值已触发）。本轮只有 Critical 发现可处理；被延后的非 Critical 部分作为审计记录保持原样，未做改动。

[rc:3815025401] Critical R12-1 —— 恢复克隆与共享门契约漂移 → 已修复

修改前先复现（探针：在 HEAD 上对两个文件各自的 Finalize verification case 原文逐一回放）：

original@HEAD finalize: {"fixed":0,"noop":0,"handoff":0,"dirty_handoff":0,"committed_handoff":0,"failed":1}
clone@HEAD    finalize: {"fixed":0,"noop":0,"handoff":1,"dirty_handoff":1,"committed_handoff":1,"failed":1}
clone report-step if: handoff clauses = false | POST_HANDOFF = PR 前形态 | N_HANDOFF = false | handoff 标题分支 = false

该克隆（qwen-autofix-recovery.yml）在运行时会暂存并执行同一份更新后的门脚本（~4512 处 cp .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh，~5928/~6102 处调用），因此合入后它执行的每一轮 handoff/dirty_handoff/committed_handoff 都会从其 PR 前的 fixed|noop) finalize case 落入 *) exit 1 → eval 标记之后出现红色 check → N_FAILED_CHECKS 重新派发，正是该发现所描述的自喂循环。

修复（镜像，而非重新推导）： 把本 PR 对 qwen-autofix.yml 的消费方改动原样应用到 qwen-autofix-recovery.yml —— finalize case、里程碑统计（N_REJECTED 正则 + N_HANDOFF 桶 + printf 措辞）、报告步骤 if: 的 outcome 分支、POST_HANDOFF 条件、三个标题分支，以及状态评论的 outcome 列表。镜像后克隆与更新后的原文件逐字节一致，仅差两处有记录的注释块（克隆自身的 RECOVERY CLONE 头部，以及原文件特有的、面向实体重解析的 no-op 注释），已用 diff 验证。建议中的另一种做法是删除克隆，但其删除条件（"原 workflow 实体恢复正常调度与执行后"）是本轮无法验证的 GitHub Actions 外部状态 —— 在未经证实的前提下删除当前实际运行的执行方有可能让整个循环停摆，因此镜像是安全的修复方式。

新增锁定测试： 新测试断言克隆与原文件保持逐字节一致（仅允许上述两处注释块差异；若克隆按其自身头部所述被删除，则提前返回）。该发现的根本抱怨 —— "没有任何测试把两个 workflow 锁定在一起，因此漂移不会被发现" —— 正是这个测试存在的意义。已验证门的要求：该测试在轮次前的树上失败（HEAD 上存在漂移），镜像后通过。

[rc:3810626994] finalize/报告步骤/POST_HANDOFF 接纳 handoff outcomes → 已验证，当前 head 上已修复

通过探针在 HEAD 上重新验证：原文件的 finalize case 对 handoff/dirty_handoff/committed_handoff 均以退出码 0 结束（仅 failed 为 1），review-address 报告步骤的 if: 带有全部三个 outcome 分支，POST_HANDOFF 也以全部三个 outcome 为键。连胜保护由通过的测试套件锁定（违约标题不匹配任何重置 needle）。无需代码改动；底层发现保持已解决状态。

[rc:3810627250] 崩溃分支保留 agent 写下的 handoff → 已验证，当前 head 上已修复

从结构与测试两方面重新验证：崩溃分支先检查 hasHandoffVerdict 并在合成任何内容之前以退出码 0 结束；loopDetected 分支仅在不存在 agent handoff 时才会到达；每个 writeHandoff 调用点还额外受该函数自身"非空文件不覆盖"检查的保护。评论中点名的三个锁定测试 —— 'preserves an agent-written handoff when qwen dies after it'、'...when the budget kills qwen after it'、'...across the loop guard' —— 外加 'never overwrites' 兄弟测试，均在 HEAD 上通过。无需代码改动；底层发现保持已解决状态。

[rv:4974670421] CHANGES_REQUESTED 审阅

该审阅唯一的新发现是 R12-1（已在上文通过其行内线程 rc:3815025401 处理）。其五条建议级发现（D12-1…D12-5）已确认与早前轮次延后非 Critical 列表中的条目重复 —— 按仅处理 Critical 的模式，本轮不做改动。

冲突

--conflict false —— 未执行 base 合并。

验证

• 复现探针（对每个文件的 finalize case 原文在 bash 下按各 outcome 回放，另加消费方分支的静态检查）：修复前复现（克隆对三种 handoff outcome 均退出 1、消费方分支缺失），修复后不再复现（克隆退出 0、消费方分支齐备）—— 通过
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js -t 'keeps the recovery clone byte-identical'（针对轮次前的克隆）—— 1 失败（漂移可见，符合验证门要求）
• 同一命令（针对修复后的树）—— 1 通过
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js（涉及区域）—— 2 个文件，209 通过
• npx prettier --check scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js —— 通过
• npx eslint scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js —— 通过
• npm run build —— 通过（退出码 0）
• npm run typecheck —— 通过（退出码 0，全部 9 个 workspace + 示例）
• npm run lint —— 通过（退出码 0）

提交：fix(ci): mirror the handoff outcome consumers into the recovery clone (#9297)（2 个文件，+102/−13）。

Deferred non-Critical feedback

Critical-only mode is active: 5 change-producing rounds are complete and the PR's diff grew src 124 / test 583 net lines beyond this counting window's baseline (budgets: 400/400). The workflow excluded the non-Critical feedback below from this round's actionable sections; the items remain open for human follow-up. Maintainer feedback is deferred only after its author has used 2 regular feedback batches in this window's Critical-only tail; authors at that budget, if any, are named below. (@qwen-code /retry starts a fresh counting window.)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @wenshao: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Review by @qwen-code-ci-bot: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (review)

• Inline rc:3810586825 .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810587145 .qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810587395 .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810587661 .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810587951 .qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810588259 .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810588580 .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810588908 .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810589182 .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810589440 .qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810589755 .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810590058 .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:?: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810590319 .qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs:634: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810590584 .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:124: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810590961 .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:124: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• Inline rc:3810591241 .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh:90: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• PR comment by @qwen-code-ci-bot: fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome #9297 (comment)

• @wenshao is at this window's regular-feedback budget — to continue: tag [Critical], submit a Request changes review, or comment @qwen-code /retry for a fresh window. / @wenshao 本窗口常规反馈预算已用完——继续请标 [Critical]、提交 Request changes、或评论 @qwen-code /retry 开新窗口。

中文说明

已进入仅处理 Critical 的模式：已完成 5 个产生改动的轮次，且本计数窗口内 diff 净增长已达 源码 124 / 测试 583 行（预算 400/400）。本轮可执行区域已排除下方非 Critical 反馈；这些条目保持开放，留待人工跟进。维护者反馈仅在其本人于本窗口 Critical-only 阶段已使用 2 批常规反馈预算后才会延后；达到预算的作者（如有）在下方点名。（评论 @qwen-code /retry 可开启新的计数窗口。）

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

No blocking issues. LGTM! ✅

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

Deferred under the convergence posture (round 13, not a blocker) — recorded, not requested in this round:

• scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js:390 — [probe] pin test's stripNoOpTouch regex hard-anchored to one incident's touch wording

中文说明

无阻断问题。LGTM！✅

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

收敛姿态下延后（第 13 轮，非阻断）——已记录，本轮不要求修改：共 1 条（原文未翻译，列表见上方英文部分）。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

3 Suggestion-level finding(s) this review confirmed are already reported on this PR and are not repeated:

• M14-1 commit+dirt double violation misreported by the dirty_handoff 'Nothing was committed' headline — already reported (round-8/10/12 deferral lists, reviews 4962266599 / 4965664755 / 4974670421)
• M14-2 committed_handoff has no behavioral runHeadline/runMark replay — already reported (round-10/11/12 deferral lists, reviews 4965664755 / 4969912763 / 4974670421)
• M14-3 :: neutralization unpinned on the two brake-violation gate arms — already reported (round-6/7/8 deferral lists, reviews 4956454327 / 4959573013 / 4962266599)

Not reviewed: the executable-script lint — .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh: shellcheck is not installed.

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted; the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

仅完成部分审查，审查缺口已披露。

本轮确认的 3 条建议级发现已在 PR 上报告过，不再重复发布（列表见上方英文部分）。

未审查：the executable-script lint — .github/scripts/run-autofix-review-verification.sh: shellcheck is not installed。

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted; the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-autofix.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.21.14)

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Could not produce a passing fix for this feedback (round 10/100). This item now needs a human; the loop stays engaged and still picks up new feedback and base conflicts, but will not retry this item on its own.

What I found before stopping:

Handoff: PR #9297 is not converging — maintainer decision required

Round 14 stopped without code changes by design. The workflow's deterministic growth brake escalated this PR: five change-producing rounds are complete in this counting window, the diff is still over budget (source 195 / test 601 net lines vs budgets of 400/400 — the test budget is the one exceeded; two prior rounds were already over budget), and the review findings themselves are what keep growing the diff. The brake contract forbids further patches this round and asks the maintainer to choose how this PR lands. Declining or implementing one direction here would be the bot making that call, so the round ends BLOCKED with this handoff.

The decision

How should PR #9297 be finished?

Option 1 — Split the PR. Land the core (the handoff output contract: the brake's BLOCKED handoff as a first-class round outcome in run-agent.mjs, the verification gate, finalize, the report step, and the skill text) and move the tail into follow-up issues. The tail is: the dirty/committed handoff classification and rejections, the milestone census bucket, the recovery-clone mirroring, the scan-isolation pin, and the open findings R14-1 and M14-1/2/3.

Option 2 — Redesign. Keep the PR whole but rework the verdict-round check color at the job level (the root cause of R14-1) as one coherent change instead of incremental patches, rebasing onto current main.

Option 3 — Accept the current state with the tail deferred. M

中文说明

🤖 未能为该反馈产生可通过验证的修复（第 10/100 轮）。此项现在需要人工处理；循环保持在线，仍会拾取新反馈与 base 冲突，但不会自行重试此项。

停止前我了解到的情况：

移交：PR #9297 无法收敛——需要维护者决策

第 14 轮按设计在未做任何代码改动的情况下停止。工作流的确定性增长刹车已对本 PR 升级：本计数窗口内已完成 5 个产生改动的轮次，diff 仍然超出预算（净增长 源码 195 / 测试 601 行，预算为 400/400——超出的是测试预算；此前已有两轮超预算），而持续增长 diff 的正是审查发现本身。刹车契约禁止本轮继续打补丁，并要求维护者决定本 PR 如何落地。在这里拒绝或实现某一个方向都等于机器人替人做决定，因此本轮以 BLOCKED 状态结束并提交这份移交说明。

需要决策的问题

PR #9297 应该如何收尾？

方案 1——拆分 PR。落地核心部分（handoff 输出契约：把刹车 BLOCKED 移交作为一等轮次结果，涉及 run-agent.mjs、验证门禁、finalize、报告步骤以及技能文档），其余尾部工作转为后续跟进 issue。尾部包括：dirty/committed handoff 的分类与拒绝、里程碑普查分桶、recovery 克隆镜像、扫描隔离固定用例，以及未解决的发现 R14-1 和 M14-1/2/3。

方案 2——重新设计。保留完整 PR，但把 verdict 轮次 check 颜色在 job 级的修正（R14-1 的根因）作为一次性连贯改动重做，而不是增量打补丁，并 rebase 到当前 main。

方案 3——接受现状、延后尾部。在解决与基线分支的冲突后合并，把 R14-1 和 M14-1/2/3 留给后续跟进 issue。

建议：方案 1（拆分）

• 核心部分是稳定的，也正是本 PR 最初要修的问题；十四个轮次无法收敛的是尾部。
• 尾部的部分对象已经消失：上游 fix(ci): keep qwen-autofix.yml under GitHub's 500 KB start-runs limit #9517 删除了 qwen-autofix-recovery.yml，因此本 PR 最新的一笔提交（把 handoff 结果消费者镜像进 recovery 克隆）已无镜像对象，可以直接丢弃而不必移植。
• 把剩余尾部（R14-1 的 job 级不变量、M14 各项发现）以小型后续 PR 的形式在 fix(ci): keep qwen-autofix.yml under GitHub's 500 KB start-runs limit #9517 之后的布局上重新推导，比继续背着 600 多行不断衍生新发现的测试代码更省。
• 方案 3 会让一个已知的 Critical 悬而未决：R14-1 描述了一种真实的自喂形态（verdict 轮次发布报告后 job 变红或被取消；下次扫描把自己的失败 check 计入并重新派发这个被有意停止的条目）。除非维护者判断该形态可以接受，否则不应在未修复的情况下合并。

决策所依据的证据

1. 增长刹车：总计第 14 轮，本窗口内 5 个产生改动的轮次，测试净行数 601 对预算 400，此前已有两轮超预算，且窗口内 diff 仍未收缩。发现反复出现在早先轮次新增的代码上，这正是无法收敛的信号。
2. 未解决的发现：
   • R14-1（Critical，行内评论 3818545723）：新的扫描隔离测试把"任何已发布的 verdict 都不会被自己的 check 重新选中"固定在步骤级，但扫描端统计的是 job 级结论（FAILURE

Run log: https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code/actions/runs/32333131545

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Could not produce a passing fix for this feedback (round 11/100). This item now needs a human; the loop stays engaged and still picks up new feedback and base conflicts, but will not retry this item on its own.

What I found before stopping:

Handoff: PR #9297 is not converging — maintainer decision required

Status: BLOCKED (defer-to-human). No code changes were made or committed this
round; per the growth-brake instruction, this round's only output is this
handoff. Nothing else in the round's feedback was actionable (no inline
comments, no review bodies, no issue-level comments, no failed checks).

The decision needed

Split, redesign, or accept-and-merge PR #9297 ("fix(autofix): make the brake's
BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome"). The autofix loop cannot make
further progress on it: the diff has stayed over the growth budget for 3
consecutive rounds and is still not shrinking, and continuing to patch is what
keeps growing it.

Why the loop stopped

• Diff-growth brake: the PR exceeded this counting window's budget for 3 prior
  rounds and is still not shrinking. Net diff vs the window baseline is
  source +195 / test +601 lines against budgets of 400/400 — the test lines
  are the overrun.
• The review findings are themselves the growth: each round closed a finding
  by adding more workflow/gate/test machinery, and the same class of gap keeps
  reappearing on code earlier rounds added. Critical-only mode cannot help
  because the Criticals are the growth.
• Shape of the PR today: 11 commits, +914/-60 lines. The core is commit
  ff76452 (~66 lines across 4 files: run-agent.mjs honors the handoff as a
  graceful exit, the verification gate reports outcome=handoff, finalize/report
  consu

中文说明

🤖 未能为该反馈产生可通过验证的修复（第 11/100 轮）。此项现在需要人工处理；循环保持在线，仍会拾取新反馈与 base 冲突，但不会自行重试此项。

停止前我了解到的情况：

交接：PR #9297 未收敛 —— 需要维护者决策

状态：BLOCKED（移交人工处理）。本轮未做任何代码改动，也未提交任何 commit；
按照增长刹车（growth brake）的指令，本轮唯一的输出就是这份交接说明。
本轮反馈中没有其他可处理的内容（无行内评论、无 review 正文、无 issue 级评论、
无失败检查项）。

需要的决策

对 PR #9297（"fix(autofix): make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class
round outcome"）做出选择：拆分、重新设计、或直接接受并合并。autofix 循环在
该 PR 上已无法继续推进：diff 已连续 3 轮超出增长预算且仍未收敛，而继续打
补丁恰恰是它持续膨胀的原因。

循环为何停止

• diff 增长刹车：本计数窗口内该 PR 已连续 3 个先前轮次超出预算，且仍未收
  敛。相对窗口基线的净 diff 为 源码 +195 / 测试 +601 行，预算为 400/400
  —— 超出的是测试行数。
• review 意见本身就是增长的来源：每一轮都是通过新增更多
  workflow/门禁/测试机制来关闭某个 finding，而同类缺口又不断出现在早前轮
  次新增的代码上。Critical-only 模式在这里也无济于事，因为 Critical 条目
  本身就是增长。
• 该 PR 目前的形态：11 个 commit，+914/-60 行。核心是 commit ff76452
  （约 66 行，涉及 4 个文件：run-agent.mjs 将 handoff 视为优雅退出、验证
  门禁报告 outcome=handoff、finalize/report 步骤消费该结果、skill 文档写明
  输出契约）。尾部是 10 个由 review 驱动的 commit（dirty-handoff 拒绝、
  no-commit-handoff 分类、committed-handoff 普查分桶、将 brake 违规以绿色
  发布、向 recovery clone 镜像、子进程回放预算），其中 +601 行测试占了大头。

与 main 的新实质冲突（不是简单的过期）

该 PR 与 origin/main 存在冲突，且冲突本身就需要一个方向性的判断：

• main 上的 fix(ci): keep qwen-autofix.yml under GitHub's 500 KB start-runs limit #9517（2026-08-20）刻意删除了
  .github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml（7,699 行 —— 一个从未发挥
  作用的事故应急克隆），并大幅重构了 qwen-autofix.yml（注释块移入
  qwen-autofix.md，同时通过 .github/scripts/check-workflow-size.sh 新增了
  470 KB 的 CI 强制 workflow 体积门禁）。
• 本 PR 的尾部 commit cc3a05d（"mirror the handoff outcome consumers
  into the recovery clone"）向这个已被删除的文件新增了约 97 行 —— 这是一个
  修改/删除型冲突。这部分工作是直接丢弃，还是重新锚定到 main 的新形态上，
  属于设计判断，不是机械合并能解决的。
• 其余文件（qwen-autofix.yml、scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js）
  可以干净地自动合并，但合并后的 qwen-autofix.yml 仍必须满足 main 新增的
  470 KB 体积门禁。

选项

1. 拆分 PR（推荐）。把核心的"handoff 成为一等轮次结果"改动（ff76452af

Run log: https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code/actions/runs/32335134509

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Could not produce a passing fix for this feedback (round 12/100). This item now needs a human; the loop stays engaged and still picks up new feedback and base conflicts, but will not retry this item on its own.

What I found before stopping:

Handoff: PR #9297 is not converging — maintainer decision required

Status: BLOCKED (defer-to-human). No code changes were made or committed this
round; per the growth-brake instruction this note is the round's only output.
It is the third consecutive stop of this kind (rounds 10 and 11 posted the
same handoff). Nothing else in this round's feedback was actionable: no inline
comments, no review bodies, no issue-level comments, no failed checks.

The decision needed

How PR #9297 ("make the brake's BLOCKED handoff a first-class round outcome",
plus "mirror the handoff outcome consumers into the recovery clone") lands,
now that the base branch has restructured the very files it touches. The loop
cannot make further progress: patching is forbidden by the brake, and the
correct conflict resolution is itself part of the decision.

Why it is not converging

• Diff vs this counting window's baseline: source 195 / test 601 net lines
  against budgets of 400/400 (the test budget is the one exceeded); 4 prior
  rounds were already over budget and the diff is still not shrinking.
• The findings drive the growth: 11 branch commits — one core fix, nine
  follow-up fixes for review findings on the new code (dirty-handoff guard,
  committed-handoff guard, green publishing of brake violations, handoff
  preservation across crashes, census buckets), one mirror commit — with 601
  net test lines pinning each behavior. Each fix added surface the next round
  reviewed.

What cha

中文说明

🤖 未能为该反馈产生可通过验证的修复（第 12/100 轮）。此项现在需要人工处理；循环保持在线，仍会拾取新反馈与 base 冲突，但不会自行重试此项。

停止前我了解到的情况：

移交：PR #9297 未收敛 —— 需要维护者决策

状态：BLOCKED（移交人工）。本轮未做任何代码改动，也未提交任何内容；按照
growth-brake（增长刹车）的指示，本说明是本轮的唯一输出。这是连续第三次同类
停止（第 10 轮与第 11 轮已发布过相同的移交说明）。本轮反馈中其余内容均不可
执行：没有行内评论、没有 review 正文、没有 issue 级评论、没有失败的检查。

需要的决策

PR #9297（"让刹车的 BLOCKED 移交成为一等轮次结果"，外加"把 handoff 结果消费
方镜像进恢复克隆工作流"）应如何落地——基础分支已经重构了它所触及的文件。循环
无法再推进：刹车禁止继续打补丁，而正确的冲突解决方式本身就是该决策的一部分。

为什么无法收敛

• 相对本计数窗口基线的 diff：源码净增 195 行 / 测试净增 601 行，预算为
  400/400（超出的是测试预算）；此前已有 4 轮超出预算，且 diff 仍在增长而非
  收缩。
• 增长由评审发现驱动：分支上共 11 个提交——1 个核心修复、9 个针对新代码评审
  发现的后续修复（脏工作区移交守卫、带提交移交守卫、刹车违规绿色发布、崩溃时
  保留移交说明、统计分桶）、1 个镜像提交——外加 601 行净增测试逐一锁定这些
  行为。每个修复都新增了下一轮评审的审查面。

评审期间 main 发生的变化（决定性）

• main 上的 fix(ci): keep qwen-autofix.yml under GitHub's 500 KB start-runs limit #9517 整体删除了 .github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml
  （7,699 行），以让工作流保持在 GitHub 500 KB 的静默启动上限之下；prose 注释
  被迁移到 qwen-autofix.md，长步骤迁移到 .github/scripts/，并新增了体积闸门
  （check-workflow-size.sh，470 KB）。
• 后果：
  1. 本 PR 的最后一个提交（把结果消费方镜像进恢复克隆）所针对的文件已不存在。
     本轮标记的 base 冲突正是这个"修改 vs 删除"冲突。按"保留我方"解决会复活
     main 刻意删除的文件；按"采用 main"解决则删掉 PR 的这部分内容。循环无法在
     两者之间做选择——这正是需要维护者拍板的决策。
  2. 其余核心改动仍能干净地自动合并（合并后的 qwen-autofix.yml 约 434 KB，低于
     新的 470 KB 闸门），且 main 仍然缺少 handoff / dirty_handoff /
     committed_handoff 这些结果消费方——缺陷依然真实存在：本次停止之所以再次以
     误导性的 "Could not produce a passing fix" 标题发布，正是因为 main 还没有
     handoff 结果。

选项

1. 重做 / 替换（推荐）：关闭本 PR，基于当前 main 提一个更小、更聚焦的新 PR，
   只承载仍缺失的核心——在闸门脚本、run-agent.mjs 和唯一保留的工作流中实现
   handoff / dirty_handoff / committed_handoff 结果，外加技能契约变更——prose
   注释按新约定放

Run log: https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code/actions/runs/32337317170

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Could not produce a passing fix for this feedback (round 13/100). This item now needs a human; the loop stays engaged and still picks up new feedback and base conflicts, but will not retry this item on its own.

What I found before stopping:

AutoFix handoff: PR #9297 is not converging — maintainer decision required

Blocker. The deterministic growth brake has engaged: 5 change-producing rounds have completed in this counting window and the diff is still over budget (source +195 / test +601 net lines vs 400/400 budgets — the test axis is over; 5 prior round(s) already over budget). The review findings are themselves driving the growth, so Critical-only mode cannot converge this PR. Per the workflow contract, this round made no code changes.

Why patching cannot fix this: main moved underneath the PR. While this PR was under review, #9517 (merged 2026-08-20) rewrote the autofix CI surface: it deleted .github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml entirely (7,699 lines), slimmed qwen-autofix.yml from ~518 KB to ~426 KB by moving comment blocks into the qwen-autofix.md design record, and added a 470,000-byte CI size gate — because GitHub silently stops starting runs for workflow files over 512,000 bytes, and the repo had hit that limit. This PR's title feature ("mirror the handoff outcome consumers into the recovery clone") modifies exactly the deleted file, so the branch now has a modify/delete conflict on .github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml.

The conflict has no neutral resolution.

• Keep the PR's qwen-autofix-recovery.yml: reverts fix(ci): keep qwen-autofix.yml under GitHub's 500 KB start-runs limit #9517's intentional deletion. The branch copy is 526,174 bytes — over GitHub's 512,000-byte hard limit — so the workflow would silently never run;

中文说明

🤖 未能为该反馈产生可通过验证的修复（第 13/100 轮）。此项现在需要人工处理；循环保持在线，仍会拾取新反馈与 base 冲突，但不会自行重试此项。

停止前我了解到的情况：

AutoFix 移交：PR #9297 无法收敛 —— 需要维护者决策

阻塞原因。 确定性增长刹车已触发：本计数窗口内已完成 5 个产生改动的轮次，diff 仍然超出预算（相对窗口基线净增长 源码 +195 / 测试 +601 行，预算为 400/400 —— 测试轴已超出；此前已有 5 轮超出预算）。评审意见本身就是增长的来源，因此仅处理 Critical 的模式也无法让本 PR 收敛。按照工作流约定，本轮未做任何代码改动。

为什么继续修补无法解决问题：main 在 PR 评审期间发生了变化。 在本 PR 评审过程中，#9517（已于 2026-08-20 合并）重写了 autofix CI 相关代码：它完整删除了 .github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml（7,699 行），将 qwen-autofix.yml 中的注释块移入设计记录 qwen-autofix.md、使其从约 518 KB 缩减到约 426 KB，并新增了 470,000 字节的 CI 大小门禁 —— 原因是 GitHub 对超过 512,000 字节的工作流文件会静默停止启动运行，而本仓库当时已触及该上限。本 PR 的标题功能（"将 handoff 结果消费方镜像到 recovery 克隆"）修改的恰恰是被删除的那个文件，因此分支现在在 .github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml 上存在一个 修改/删除 冲突。

该冲突没有中立的解法。

• 保留本 PR 的 qwen-autofix-recovery.yml：等于回退了 fix(ci): keep qwen-autofix.yml under GitHub's 500 KB start-runs limit #9517 有意的删除。分支上该文件为 526,174 字节 —— 超过 GitHub 512,000 字节的硬上限 —— 该工作流将静默地永远无法运行；保留它会重新制造 fix(ci): keep qwen-autofix.yml under GitHub's 500 KB start-runs limit #9517 刚修复的那次故障。
• 采用 main 的删除：本 PR 的标题提交和最后一个提交（cc3a05d026）将失去意义，必须丢弃或重写。

本轮实测事实（只读，无任何改动）。

• 分支落后 origin/main 13 个提交。git merge-tree HEAD origin/main 报告一个冲突（修改/删除：.github/workflows/qwen-autofix-recovery.yml）；qwen-autofix.yml 与 scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js 可自动合并。
• 在自动合并后的树中，qwen-autofix.yml 为 434,067 字节 —— 低于新的 470,000 字节门禁，因此本 PR 对主工作流的消费方改动可以原样移植。
• 分支上 qwen-autofix.yml 为 525,685 字节、qwen-autofix-recovery.yml 为 526,174 字节 —— 均超过 512,000 字节硬上限，因此分支若不做改动直接合并，将再次破坏 schedule/dispatch 运行。
• 本轮反馈中没有失败的检查，也没有可执行的评审意见 —— 只有刹车本身和已延后的非 Critical 审计条目。

需要决策的问题：#9297 的 handoff 结果契约工作，如何（或是否）落地到 #9517 之后的 CI 架构上。

选项：

1. 拆分 PR（推荐）。 将与 recovery 克隆无关的核心部分作为一个小型后续 PR 落地到当前 main 上：.qwen/skills/autofix/scripts/run-agent.mjs 中的 handoff 输出契约、`.qwen/skills/auto

Run log: https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code/actions/runs/32341724614

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max

[wenshao]

@qwen-code /triage

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Sandboxed verification: ❌ not passed — findings reported (agent verdict) - workflow run

Ran the PR in an isolated, token-free container: A/B against the base build, mock-free harness assertions, targeted gates. Advisory evidence for human reviewers — not a review, an approval, or a CI check.

Scripted assertions: 329 passed · 0 failed · 329 total

Flakiness gate: ⚠️ consistent-fail — 1 of 2 changed test file(s) failed identically in every round — deterministic, so CI owns that signal

中文 — 判定：❌ 不通过 · 报告了发现（agent 判定）

沙箱验证在隔离、无凭证的容器中执行了该 PR 的代码（与 base 构建 A/B 对照、无 mock harness 断言、定向门禁）。仅作为评审证据，不构成评审、批准或 CI 检查。

脚本断言：329 通过 · 0 失败 · 329 总计

抖动门：⚠️ consistent-fail — 1 of 2 changed test file(s) failed identically in every round — deterministic, so CI owns that signal

Verification report

PR 9297 — Deep Verification

Verdict: findings — 329/329 scripted assertions passed (0 unexpected failures); central claim proven load-bearing by A/B. One non-blocking Suggestion (double brake-violation posts an inaccurate headline). Verified head 8fb2ed060ad0aec195f191ac6ac5bca3f0998865 (merge 44df4b74c2, base 02d303f849).

中文摘要

• 结论：findings（非阻塞）。核心主张经 A/B 证实为承重变更：329/329 断言通过，0 个意外失败。
• A/B 结论：runner 层（run-agent.mjs）与验证门（gate）两层均在 base 复现 fix(review): normalize last-gate inputs and anchor mid-line fragments #9222 第 6/7 轮的坏行为（仅写 handoff.md 被判 "finished without required output file(s)"、崩溃/API 错误把 handoff 盖成 failure.md 并重试），head 全部修复（handoff 成为一等结果、跨崩溃保留、:: 中和、非重试）。
• 发现：1 条 Suggestion（非阻塞）——同时存在 commit + 脏工作区 + handoff.md 时，脏守卫先于 commit 守卫触发，判为 dirty_handoff，其评论标题声称 "Nothing was committed"，但该轮其实有提交——正是本 PR 为 commit 情形专门建 committed_handoff 想避免的误报。循环安全性不受影响（非重试、handoff 照常发布、watermark 前进），仅罕见形状下评论措辞不准。
• 未覆盖：yamllint 无法在容器内安装（无 pip），未运行（YAML 有效性由 actionlint + yaml 包解析覆盖）；runner 侧 handoff 评论发布将由下一次真实 brake 轮次验证（PR 自述范围外）；recovery clone 字节一致性测试在 HEAD 为空操作（该文件在 base/head 均不存在）。

Central claim

When the growth brake fires and the agent writes only handoff.md, the round ends as a first-class handoff outcome (green, published, watermark advanced) end to end — instead of dying as "finished without required output file(s)" and burying the brake's decision under a generic failure.md. Secondary claims: (1) the two brake-violation shapes (dirty / committed) get their own non-retryable outcomes that still publish green; (2) an agent-written handoff survives crashes and is never reclassified or overwritten.

A/B proof (runner layer, run-agent.mjs) — witness 01-runner-ab-base-vs-head.png (top = base control, bottom = head). 58 assertions.

cell	head	base (control, expected broken)
R1 handoff only	exit 0, logs content, :: neutralized, no failure.md	exit 1 "required output file(s)", failure.md buries handoff
R2 nothing	exit 1	exit 1 (unchanged)
R3 address-summary	exit 0	exit 0 (unchanged)
R4 addr + handoff	exit 0, spec verdict wins	exit 0 (unchanged)
R5 failure.md	exit 0	exit 0 (unchanged)
R6 empty handoff	exit 1 (not a verdict)	exit 1 (same)
R7 handoff + crash	exit 0, preserves handoff, no failure.md shadow	exit 1, synthesizes failure.md shadow
R8 API-error tail + handoff	exit 0, no retry sentinel	exit 1, writes retry sentinel + failure.md
R9 failure + handoff + crash	exit 1, handoff survives verbatim	exit 1, overwrites agent handoff
R10 loop-guard + handoff	exit 0, handoff outranks synthesis	exit 1, overwrites with loop note

Base reproduces the exact #9222 round-6/7 defect; head fixes every handoff shape while leaving all pre-existing verdicts byte-identical.

A/B proof (gate layer, verify gate) — witness 02-gate-ab-base-vs-head.png. 42 assertions.

cell	head	base (control)
G1 clean no-commit handoff	outcome=handoff, exit 0, non-retryable	outcome=failed, exit 1
G2 handoff + no-action	handoff (outranks no-action)	noop
G3 handoff + failure.md	failed exit 1	failed (same)
G4 no-action	noop	noop (same)
G5 nothing	failed	failed (same)
G6 empty handoff	failed (not a verdict)	failed (same)
G7 handoff + stale schema	handoff exit 0 before structural checks	failed + retryable=true (repair would delete handoff.md)
G8 handoff + dirt	dirty_handoff exit 1 non-retryable	failed + retryable=true
G9 handoff + commit	committed_handoff exit 1 non-retryable	failed (no dedicated guard)

G7 is the sharpest cell: on base the brake's own compliant stop was classified retryable exactly where the brake fires (red PRs trip the schema check), engaging the repair pass that deletes handoff.md. Head classifies it handoff before the structural checks.

Corrections

None — no prior review round described this code inaccurately.

Findings

S1 (Suggestion, non-blocking) — double brake-violation posts an inaccurate "Nothing was committed" headline

Repro (boundary probe B1, witness 04-boundary-probes-double-violation-and-neutralization.png): fixture with an agent commit + tracked dirt + handoff.md → gate returns outcome=dirty_handoff (the dirty guard runs before the committed guard). The dirty_handoff headline in qwen-autofix.yml then states "Nothing was committed; the uncommitted work was discarded with the runner" — false whenever the round also has a commit (the commit is discarded/unpushed, but it was committed).

This is precisely the misreport the PR created committed_handoff to avoid ("a commit DID happen, so the dirty-handoff headline claiming nothing was committed would misreport it") — but the guard ordering lets it back in on the combined shape.

Why non-blocking: the round is still rejected non-retryably, the handoff note is posted, and the watermark advances — loop safety holds. Only the posted headline's accuracy is affected, on a rare double-violation shape.

Suggested fix (not applied, not measured — flag for author): either evaluate the committed guard before the dirty guard, or make the dirty_handoff headline commit-neutral when committed_rc=1. Wording choice is the author's; the PR's own honesty bar is the reason to fix.

Not covered

• yamllint: could not be installed in-container (pip3 absent / permission denied), so the repo yamllint gate was not run. YAML validity is instead covered by actionlint (exit 0 on qwen-autofix.yml, live-proven) and a yaml-package parse (8 jobs). bash -n, node --check, actionlint, shellcheck all ran (see Methodology).
• Runner-side comment/marker posting for handoff: verified only as routing (report-step if:-clause and POST_HANDOFF pins via the suite's bash replays); the live GitHub post happens on the next real brake round (PR-declared out of scope).
• Recovery-clone byte-identity test no-ops at HEAD: qwen-autofix-recovery.yml is absent at both base and head (removed by a later main-merge), so commit cc3a05d's "mirror into recovery clone" has no effect at the final merge. Not a defect — nothing exists to mirror.
• Per-commit attribution: checkout is depth-2; verified the aggregate HEAD^1..HEAD diff only.
• Working-tree anomaly (environment, not a PR finding): the main checkout arrived with .qwen/skills/autofix/SKILL.md and run-agent.mjs uncommitted-reverted to base. I ran all verification from clean tmp/head-tree / tmp/base-tree worktrees so results reflect the committed PR; the dirty tree was used only as the coarse mutant for vacuity. Left untouched.

Methodology

Environment: node:22-bookworm container (live sample of the verify lane; zstd/shellcheck/actionlint/yamllint absent — I installed actionlint+shellcheck via node scripts/lint.js --setup; yamllint unavailable). All A/B driven against clean git worktrees of HEAD and HEAD^1 (no dependency-tree changes, so node_modules reuse is a clean control). Runner A/B (runner-ab.mjs) and gate A/B (gate-ab.mjs) reproduce the repo's own runGate/stub-qwen fixtures and run the real run-agent.mjs / verify-gate from each tree; base control cells assert the broken behavior and count as passes when it reproduces. Boundary probes (boundary-probes.mjs) test guard precedence and the :: neutralization ladder through the real gate branch. Suite at head: qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js 192 passed + qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js 17 passed (vitest, cwd=head-tree). Vacuity/mutation: coarse mutant = the dirty tree's reverted runner+skill (7 runner-layer handoff tests red, behavioral; 11 gate/workflow tests stay green), fine mutants = gate handoff branch disabled (2 red) and finalize case arm reverted (1 red), each killed by the intended assertion and green when restored (witness 03-mutation-vacuity-matrix.png). Lint: node --check (runner) clean; bash -n (gate, base+head) clean and live-proven; actionlint exit 0 and live-proven; shellcheck exits 1 on base and head alike (4 pre-existing SC2154 warnings = documented inherited env; PR adds exactly one SC2312 note matching the script's existing 17). Raw logs and harnesses live in logs/ and the artifact root. Assertion breakdown: harnesses 110 (runner 58 + gate 42 + boundary 10) + vitest 209 + mutation expected-fail controls 10 = 329.

Flakiness gate log

rounds=5 files=2 skipped=0
file scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js: (cd .) npx --no-install vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts ./scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js
file scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js: (cd .) npx --no-install vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts ./scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js


per-file results (P=pass F=fail I=infra-exit, one letter per run):
  scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js: FFFFF
  scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js: PPPPP

verdict: consistent-fail
summary: 1 of 2 changed test file(s) failed identically in every round — deterministic, so CI owns that signal

--- per-invocation detail (full copy in the artifact) ---
round 1 · scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js: F (exit 1)
--- output tail · round 1 · scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js ---
�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mbehaviorally replays the eligibility recheck across lifecycle and label states �[33m 3687�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mreleases the dispatch-pending marker when the recheck discards a target �[33m 1077�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mraises the round cap to TAKEOVER_MAX_ROUNDS while the label is present �[33m 463�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mbehaviorally replays the takeover-command toggle across all four paths �[33m 3844�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mbehaviorally resets round counting at the latest takeover engage ack �[33m 846�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mbehaviorally seeds the round counter from the window anchor and only from it �[33m 1729�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mrecovers transient forced-target reads and reports terminal takeover blocks �[33m 718�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mwires forced admission end to end: reader, classifier, permission gate, reporter �[33m 436�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mposts the non-main base refusal without depending on any other API call �[33m 2043�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mswitches to Critical-only feedback after five change rounds �[33m 407�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mescalates to a maintainer-decision handoff when the diff keeps growing past budget (non-convergence) �[33m 851�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mposts a takeover milestone digest as rounds accumulate, with a residual bucket �[33m 669�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mrejects a round that expands into CI machinery outside the PR footprint �[33m 1239�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22msurfaces deny-by-default footprint expansions, rejecting only when enforcement says so �[33m 427�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mupserts deferred findings into a per-PR issue that survives the merge �[33m 12100�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mbite check: rejects a round whose changed tests pass on the pre-round tree �[33m 14205�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mrepairs one deterministic rejection and finalizes only the last verdict �[33m 473�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mretries a verification-gate crash instead of burying the fix �[33m 1122�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mstops a PR that fails to push for CONSECUTIVE_FAILURE_CAP rounds in a row �[33m 2044�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mre-arms a stranded PR from a marker instead of a deleted comment �[33m 984�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22maddress-side stale check mirrors the scan-side re-arm logic under bash �[33m 1913�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mbehaviorally posts the re-arm marker only after verifying the PAT identity �[33m 1941�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mresolves only the review threads whose findings it implemented �[33m 4299�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mdoes not flag an API error that appears after a real verdict or a loop guard �[33m 351�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mflags recoverable API renders without a leading status code, and skips non-recoverable ones �[33m 488�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mclassifies permanent API failures terminal and records the cause class �[33m 1495�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mpreserves an agent-written handoff when the budget kills qwen after it �[33m 658�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m review verification gate: baseline A/B on deterministic rejection�[2m > �[22mcharges the round when the codes match but the messages differ �[33m 368�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m review verification gate: baseline A/B on deterministic rejection�[2m > �[22mcharges the round when the baseline fails for a DIFFERENT reason �[33m 347�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m review verification gate: baseline A/B on deterministic rejection�[2m > �[22mcharges the round when the baseline fails without a failure identity �[33m 1255�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m review verification gate: baseline A/B on deterministic rejection�[2m > �[22mclassifies an unchanged branch by its verdict files (handoff contract) �[33m 799�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m review verification gate: baseline A/B on deterministic rejection�[2m > �[22mrejects a handoff written over a dirty workspace, non-retryably �[33m 536�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m review verification gate: baseline A/B on deterministic rejection�[2m > �[22mclassifies a no-commit handoff before the structural checks �[33m 334�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m review verification gate: baseline A/B on deterministic rejection�[2m > �[22mnever A/Bs the dist-coupled and stdin-fed checks �[33m 410�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m run-agent idle watchdog�[2m > �[22mkills a silent agent at the idle window, naming the idle limit �[33m 1269�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m run-agent idle watchdog�[2m > �[22mnever fires while the agent emits protocol events, however slowly �[33m 3280�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m run-agent idle watchdog�[2m > �[22mnever fires while the agent talks on stderr only �[33m 3278�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m run-agent idle watchdog�[2m > �[22mdoes not treat an unterminated stdout byte stream as progress �[33m 933�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m run-agent idle watchdog�[2m > �[22mrequests streamed partial progress so active headless work refreshes the watchdog �[33m 3331�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m stale sandbox container cleanup�[2m > �[22man idle kill removes only the running sandbox its own agent launched �[33m 1305�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m stale sandbox container cleanup�[2m > �[22ma budget kill removes only the running sandbox its own agent launched �[33m 1297�[2mms�[22m�[39m
�[31m⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯�[39m�[1m�[41m Unhandled Errors �[49m�[22m�[31m⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯�[39m
�[31m�[1m
Vitest caught 1 unhandled error during the test run.
This might cause false positive tests. Resolve unhandled errors to make sure your tests are not affected.�[22m�[39m

�[31m⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯�[39m�[1m�[41m Unhandled Error �[49m�[22m�[31m⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯�[39m
�[31m�[1mError�[22m: [vitest-worker]: Timeout calling "onTaskUpdate"�[39m
�[90m �[2m❯�[22m Object.onTimeoutError node_modules/vitest/dist/chunks/rpc.-pEldfrD.js:�[2m53:10�[22m�[39m
�[90m �[2m❯�[22m Timeout._onTimeout node_modules/vitest/dist/chunks/index.B521nVV-.js:�[2m59:62�[22m�[39m
�[90m �[2m❯�[22m listOnTimeout node:internal/timers:�[2m585:17�[22m�[39m
�[90m �[2m❯�[22m processTimers node:internal/timers:�[2m521:7�[22m�[39m

�[31m⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯�[39m


�[2m Test Files �[22m �[1m�[32m1 passed�[39m�[22m�[90m (1)�[39m
�[2m      Tests �[22m �[1m�[32m192 passed�[39m�[22m�[90m (192)�[39m
�[2m     Errors �[22m �[1m�[31m1 error�[39m�[22m
�[2m   Start at �[22m 08:40:25
�[2m   Duration �[22m 97.57s�[2m (transform 278ms, setup 23ms, collect 334ms, tests 96.79s, environment 0ms, prepare 126ms)�[22m


round 1 · scripts/tests/qwen-fleet-shepherd-workflow.test.js: P (exit 0)
round 2 · scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js: F (exit 1)
--- output tail · round 2 · scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js ---
22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mholds a round while review-pr is in flight on the head (#8888) �[33m 529�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mauto-updates a PR red only from a stale base, gated on green-on-main �[33m 788�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mauto-reruns a check that died on infrastructure, once, guarded by run_attempt �[33m 807�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mkeeps a still-red check visible, but only once per head �[33m 301�[2mms�[22m�[39m
   �[33m�[2m✓�[22m�[39m qwen-autofix workflow�[2m > �[22mbehaviorally replays the stale-duplicate revalidation, i

...truncated -- full content in the run artifacts.

Evidence images

Harness scripts and raw logs are in the workflow run artifacts (7-day retention).

— Qwen Code · sandboxed verification

[doudouOUC]

LGTM✅

fixed

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

LGTM, looks ready to ship. ✅

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Released in v0.21.15.