fix(triage): render the verify report as sanitized markdown, not an escaped pre dump

[wenshao]

Problem

The sandboxed-verification comment embeds report.md inside <details><pre><code> with full HTML escaping. Secure, but unreadable: the report is a curated bilingual markdown document — tables, headings, nested <details> folds — and the pre/code embedding displays it as a wall of raw source. #8140's verify comment is the exhibit: literal ** asterisks, table pipes, <details> tag text, and && remnants — what a reader perceives as 乱码.

Change

report.md now renders as markdown via a new emit_report, holding the same security floor with four line-independent guarantees:

1. Tag allowlist — every & < > is escaped, then only the structural tags the report legitimately uses (details/summary/pre/code/br) are un-escaped back to live tags. No other tag can form: <img>, <script>, onerror never render.
2. Marker forgery broken — the comment-open token is neutralized (the autofix-proven <!-- breaker), so no forged qwen-triage:* marker can appear in the raw body that the upsert/snapshot logic greps.
3. Mentions defused — @ becomes @: renders identically, can never ping.
4. Fold balancing — unbalanced <details> opens are counted and closed at the end, so a malformed report cannot swallow the comment footer.

Fallbacks: an oversized report (>45 KB) goes through the old escaped-pre embedding wholesale — truncated markdown dangles fences and folds — and so does any sanitizer pipeline failure. The tmux lane's raw-log embedding is untouched (escaped pre remains the right shape for logs).

One robustness fix surfaced by the test suite: the fold-balancer's zero-match grep carries || true, since under the step's pipefail a report with no folds would otherwise kill the whole composer.

Tests

A behavioral replay drives the real emit_report against a structural + hostile fixture:

• structure survives — tables, bold, nested folds render; no <pre><code> on the normal path;
• security floor holds — no live <!-- qwen-triage in the raw output, no @everyone, no <img>, entities escaped, only allowlisted tags present, folds balanced;
• oversize falls back to the escaped shape with the truncated summary;
• the report call site uses emit_report while the tmux lane keeps emit_block.

Full-render ordering pin updated to the new ### Verification report heading. 108/108 pass; workflow YAML parses.

中文说明

问题

沙箱验证评论把 report.md 整体 HTML 转义后塞进 <details><pre><code>。安全，但不可读：报告本身是精排的双语 markdown 文档（表格、标题、嵌套折叠），pre/code 嵌入让它以纯源码形态显示——#8140 的验证评论即实例：裸露的 ** 星号、表格管道符、<details> 标签文本、&& 实体残留，读者看到的就是乱码。

改动

report.md 改经新的 emit_report 以 markdown 渲染，通过四条与行无关的保证维持同等安全底线：标签白名单（全量转义后仅回解 details/summary/pre/code/br，其余标签永远无法成形）；标记伪造打断（沿用 autofix 已验证的 <!-- 中和手法，upsert 逻辑 grep 的原始 body 中不可能出现伪造的 qwen-triage:* 标记）；提及熄火（@→@，显示相同、永不触发）；折叠配平（统计并补齐未闭合的 <details>，畸形报告吞不掉页脚）。

回退：超限（>45 KB）报告整体走旧的转义 pre 嵌入（截断的 markdown 会悬挂围栏与折叠），净化管道失败同样回退。tmux 原始日志嵌入保持不动（对日志而言转义 pre 本就是正确形态）。

测试套件揪出一个健壮性问题：折叠配平的零匹配 grep 需要 || true——在步骤的 pipefail 下，无折叠的报告会导致整个组装器退出。

测试

行为回放驱动真实 emit_report（结构+敌意混合 fixture）：结构存活（表格/加粗/嵌套折叠渲染、常规路径无 pre/code）；安全底线成立（原始输出无活标记/提及/标签、实体转义、折叠配平）；超限回退到转义形态；报告调用点用 emit_report 而 tmux 通道保持 emit_block。全渲染顺序 pin 更新为新标题。108/108 通过；YAML 解析正常。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

✅ Qwen Triage finished — view run. See the stage comments in this thread for the result.

✅ Qwen Triage 已完成 —— 查看运行。结果见本线程中的各阶段评论。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Thanks for the PR! (Re-run on the rewritten sanitizer at cea325f.)

Template: the body uses ## Problem / ## Change / ## Tests instead of the template's headings — content-wise everything is covered (and then some), so not blocking, just worth aligning next time.

Problem: observed and well-evidenced. #8140's verify comment is a concrete exhibit — literal ** asterisks, table pipes, <details> tag text rendered as a wall of raw source. This is a real readability problem, not theoretical hardening.

Direction: aligned. The verify report is a curated bilingual markdown document; embedding it as an escaped <pre> dump defeats its purpose. Squarely within triage-infrastructure scope, no public-contract or sandbox-model surface.

Size: not applicable — no core paths touched (.github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml and scripts/tests/ only). ~236 production lines + ~500 test lines.

Approach: the scope feels right — one new function (emit_report), one call-site swap, one comprehensive behavioral test. Worth naming for the record: the implementation grew substantially across the review loop, from a short sed pipeline into a code-region-aware Node sanitizer. That growth is justified hardening, not scope creep — each added guard pins a real CommonMark/GitHub parser divergence the reviewers reproduced (paragraph-spanning code spans, backslash-escaped backticks, list-nested fences, pre-escaped-entity forgery), and every one fails closed toward the escaped fallback rather than toward live HTML. The tmux lane correctly keeps emit_block.

Risk: no elevated risk signals (no high-risk paths matched).

Moving on to code review. 🔍

中文说明

感谢贡献！（本次为针对 cea325f 重写后净化器的 re-run。）

模板：PR body 使用了 ## Problem / ## Change / ## Tests 而非模板标题——内容齐全（甚至更丰富），不阻塞，下次对齐即可。

问题：已观测且有实证。#8140 的验证评论就是具体例子——裸露的 ** 星号、表格管道符、<details> 标签文本以纯源码形式显示。是真实的可读性问题，不是理论性加固。

方向：对齐。验证报告本身是精排的双语 markdown 文档，用转义 <pre> 嵌入等于白费排版。完全在 triage 基础设施范围内，不涉及公共契约或沙箱模型。

规模：不适用——未触及核心路径（仅 .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml 和 scripts/tests/）。约 236 行生产代码 + 约 500 行测试。

方案：范围合理——一个新函数（emit_report）、一个调用点替换、一个全面的行为测试。需要说明：实现经过 review 循环增长较多，从简短的 sed 管道变为代码区域感知的 Node 净化器。这一增长是合理的加固，而非范围蔓延——每条新增守卫都钉住了 reviewer 复现出的真实 CommonMark/GitHub 解析器分歧（跨段落代码片段、反斜杠转义反引号、列表嵌套围栏、预转义实体伪造），且全部 fail-closed 回退到转义形态，而非放行活 HTML。tmux 通道正确保留 emit_block。

风险：无升级风险信号（未命中高风险路径）。

进入代码审查 🔍

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max-preview

_{Reviewed at cea325f79ccdb66953b6036a9860984b4d9fa3b1 · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Code review

Independent proposal: given the problem (a curated markdown report displayed as raw source inside <pre><code>), I'd add a sanitizing renderer that escapes prose, selectively un-escapes only the structural tags the report uses, neutralizes comment-open tokens and mentions, balances folds, and falls back to the old escaped embedding for oversized or unparseable input — wired in at the single report call site, leaving the tmux log lane on the escaped path. One function, one swap, a hostile-fixture test.

Comparison with the diff: the PR matches this proposal. The one place it goes further than my baseline is the right call: a flat sed escaper can't tell code regions from prose, and CommonMark does not decode entities inside code spans/fences — so unconditional escaping would show && / <T> / @pkg inside the very commands, generic types, and scoped-package paths a verification report is read to copy (relocating the #8140 symptom into code). The rewrite to a code-region-aware Node scanner is the correct response to that, not over-engineering.

Security floor — I traced all four guarantees against the current code:

1. Tag allowlist. escProse stashes only bare <details>/<summary> (and their closers) behind a

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Confidence: 5/5 — clean across every stage; the security floor holds by construction (fail-closed default), the tests pin every reproduced hole, and CI is green. Would merge without hesitation.

Stepping back: this started as "make the verify comment readable" and the review loop turned it into a genuinely hard problem — render markdown without trusting the renderer's prose/code split to match GitHub's. My independent proposal was the escape-all-then-allowlist shape, and the PR matches it; where it goes further (the code-region-aware scanner) is the correct response to CommonMark not decoding entities in code, not complexity for its own sake.

The thing that earns the 5/5 rather than a wary 4 is the default direction. A flat scanner will always have some unenumerated divergence from GitHub's container-aware parser, and this design makes every such divergence fail toward the escaped <pre> fallback or toward over-escaping — never toward live HTML. So the four guarantees don't depend on the author (or me) having enumerated every edge; the safe direction is the floor. I tried to think of a line that reaches the output as live markup the sanitizer treated as inert, and the fail-closed bails close each path I found.

If I had to maintain this in six months, I'd thank the author — the comments document each CommonMark divergence and why its guard exists, and the test names the guarantee each fixture targets. The growth from the earlier sed version is the accumulated cost of getting that floor right, and it's worth it.

The one thing to keep an eye on is the residual the author already named: links and images now render live, so a phishing link under the bot identity is the remaining surface (bounded — it needs a compromised verify-agent output, and images are camo-proxied). The committed follow-up to defuse link targets is the right next step; it doesn't block this.

Approving, pinned to the reviewed commit. ✅

中文说明

置信度：5/5 —— 每个阶段都干净；安全底线由构造保证（fail-closed 默认），测试钉住每个复现出的漏洞，CI 全绿。毫不犹豫地合并。

退一步看：这起初只是"让验证评论可读"，经 review 循环变成一个真正困难的问题——在不信任渲染器的 prose/code 切分与 GitHub 一致的前提下渲染 markdown。我的独立方案就是"全量转义后白名单回解"形态，PR 与之吻合；它走得更远的地方（代码区域感知扫描器）是对 CommonMark 不在代码中解码实体的正确回应，而非为复杂而复杂。

之所以给 5/5 而非谨慎的 4，关键在于默认方向。扁平扫描器对 GitHub 容器感知解析器总会有某些未枚举的分歧，而本设计让每一个这样的分歧都 fail 向转义 <pre> 回退或过度转义——绝不放行活 HTML。因此四条保证不依赖于作者（或我）枚举了每一个边缘情况；安全方向就是底线。我试图想出能作为活标记抵达输出、却被净化器当作惰性代码的一行，fail-closed 回退关闭了我找到的每条路径。

如果六个月后我要维护这段代码，我会感谢作者——注释记录了每个 CommonMark 分歧及其守卫存在之因，测试点名每个 fixture 所针对的保证。从早期 sed 版本的增长，是把这条底线做对所累积的成本，值得。

唯一需要留意的是作者已点名的残留面：链接和图片现在会渲染为活的，因此 bot 身份下的钓鱼链接是剩余表面（有界——需要被攻陷的 verify-agent 输出，且图片经 camo 代理）。已承诺的"中和链接目标"后续是正确的下一步；不阻塞本 PR。

审批通过，钉在所审提交。✅

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max-preview

_{Reviewed at cea325f79ccdb66953b6036a9860984b4d9fa3b1 · re-run with @qwen-code /triage}

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Package	Lines	Statements	Functions	Branches
CLI	83.2%	83.2%	89.31%	82.53%
Core	87.42%	87.42%	89.05%	86.08%

CLI Package - Full Text Report

-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
File               | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | Uncovered Line #s 
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
All files          |    83.2 |    82.53 |   89.31 |    83.2 |                   
 src               |   84.51 |    81.04 |   89.13 |   84.51 |                   
  cli.ts           |   94.21 |    83.33 |     100 |   94.21 | ...72-573,583-584 
  gemini.tsx       |   74.12 |    76.95 |    82.6 |   74.12 | ...1183-1187,1308 
  ...ractiveCli.ts |   85.65 |    81.55 |   87.17 |   85.65 | ...2390,2396,2448 
  ...liCommands.ts |   88.34 |     83.6 |      90 |   88.34 | ...63,480,514,635 
  ...ActiveAuth.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 66-80             
 ...cp-integration |    69.6 |    72.45 |   89.77 |    69.6 |                   
  acpAgent.ts      |   69.27 |    72.31 |    89.8 |   69.27 | ...01,11306-11308 
  authMethods.ts   |      92 |       60 |     100 |      92 | 33-34             
  errorCodes.ts    |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-22              
  ...ion-skills.ts |     100 |    88.23 |     100 |     100 | 17,32             
  generation.ts    |    97.1 |    81.25 |     100 |    97.1 | 109,112           
  ...DirContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ration/service |   97.04 |    95.71 |   93.33 |   97.04 |                   
  filesystem.ts    |   97.04 |    95.71 |   93.33 |   97.04 | ...21-122,238-239 
 ...ration/session |   91.56 |    86.62 |    96.5 |   91.56 |                   
  Session.ts       |   91.14 |     85.5 |   96.03 |   91.14 | ...9148,9175-9179 
  ...entTracker.ts |   91.87 |    89.18 |   88.88 |   91.87 | ...33,197,280-289 
  ...stop-guard.ts |     100 |    98.07 |     100 |     100 | 37,127            
  ...eplay-page.ts |    93.1 |    90.72 |     100 |    93.1 | 71,82-85,111-121  
  ...y-replayer.ts |   98.53 |    95.52 |     100 |   98.53 | 238-240           
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-40              
  ...ssionUtils.ts |   89.76 |    86.76 |     100 |   89.76 | ...54-270,326-328 
  tasksSnapshot.ts |    94.3 |     87.5 |     100 |    94.3 | 65-71             
  ...on-tracker.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ssion/emitters |   95.68 |     93.7 |   96.66 |   95.68 |                   
  ...ageEmitter.ts |   95.34 |    94.11 |     100 |   95.34 | 52-59             
  PlanEmitter.ts   |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 59                
  base-emitter.ts  |   78.26 |       75 |     100 |   78.26 | 23-24,26-28       
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-10              
  ...ll-emitter.ts |   99.17 |    97.43 |     100 |   99.17 | 352-353           
 ...ession/rewrite |    91.8 |    89.13 |   94.44 |    91.8 |                   
  LlmRewriter.ts   |    82.4 |     86.2 |     100 |    82.4 | ...,88-89,166-170 
  ...Middleware.ts |   96.96 |    88.09 |     100 |   96.96 | 144,152-154       
  TurnBuffer.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 src/commands      |   89.02 |    73.18 |   64.51 |   89.02 |                   
  auth.ts          |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 11,14             
  channel.ts       |   55.55 |      100 |       0 |   55.55 | 18-22,30-40       
  extensions.tsx   |   96.77 |      100 |      50 |   96.77 | 39                
  hooks.tsx        |   66.66 |      100 |       0 |   66.66 | 20-24             
  mcp.ts           |   95.45 |      100 |      50 |   95.45 | 31                
  review.ts        |   98.03 |      100 |      50 |   98.03 | 62                
  serve.ts         |   86.85 |     67.3 |     100 |   86.85 | ...32-635,649-653 
  sessions.ts      |     100 |      100 |      50 |     100 |                   
  update.ts        |   98.13 |    94.44 |   66.66 |   98.13 | 82-83             
 ...mmands/channel |   86.94 |     87.1 |   89.61 |   86.94 |                   
  channel-cwd.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...l-registry.ts |      80 |    84.61 |      80 |      80 | 37-40,49-52,63-66 
  ...entry-path.ts |      75 |       50 |     100 |      75 | 8-9               
  config-utils.ts  |   95.87 |    96.35 |     100 |   95.87 | ...08-213,271-274 
  configure.ts     |    14.7 |      100 |       0 |    14.7 | 18-21,23-84       
  daemon-worker.ts |   93.88 |    85.39 |   94.11 |   93.88 | ...1207,1214-1215 
  loop-runtime.ts  |   91.66 |      100 |      50 |   91.66 | 15,22             
  ...classifier.ts |   98.49 |    96.51 |     100 |   98.49 | 115-116,161       
  ...tact-store.ts |   93.51 |    87.65 |     100 |   93.51 | ...71,288-289,337 
  pairing.ts       |   72.85 |      100 |      50 |   72.85 | 22-28,57-68       
  pidfile.ts       |   95.55 |       90 |     100 |   95.55 | ...50-251,315-316 
  proxy.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  reload.ts        |    77.5 |    86.95 |      75 |    77.5 | 72-84,93-97       
  runtime.ts       |   81.42 |    87.71 |     100 |   81.42 | ...70-174,234-236 
  set.ts           |   75.72 |    85.71 |      50 |   75.72 | 65-83,111-116     
  start.ts         |   75.05 |    73.17 |   76.92 |   75.05 | ...31,537-540,552 
  ...ure-format.ts |   93.65 |    82.45 |     100 |   93.65 | ...42,48-49,74-75 
  status.ts        |   78.57 |    59.25 |   66.66 |   78.57 | ...36-137,150-161 
  stop.ts          |   57.83 |    82.35 |      50 |   57.83 | ...3,74-76,85-111 
 ...nds/extensions |   88.82 |    87.64 |   87.09 |   88.82 |                   
  consent.ts       |   72.53 |       90 |   42.85 |   72.53 | ...86-142,157-163 
  disable.ts       |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 30                
  enable.ts        |     100 |    91.66 |     100 |     100 | 38                
  install.ts       |   82.95 |    81.57 |      75 |   82.95 | ...96-199,202-211 
  link.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  list.ts          |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 18                
  new.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  settings.ts      |   99.15 |      100 |   83.33 |   99.15 | 151               
  sources.ts       |   93.42 |    87.09 |   92.85 |   93.42 | ...4-66,96-98,167 
  uninstall.ts     |   74.57 |       40 |   66.66 |   74.57 | 45-47,60-67,70-73 
  update.ts        |   96.71 |    97.05 |     100 |   96.71 | 114-118           
  utils.ts         |      75 |    53.84 |     100 |      75 | ...27-131,133-137 
 ...les/mcp-server |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  example.ts       |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-60              
 ...amples/starter |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  example.ts       |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-64              
 src/commands/mcp  |   90.17 |    84.39 |   83.33 |   90.17 |                   
  add.ts           |    99.3 |    96.07 |     100 |    99.3 | 154-155           
  approve.ts       |   76.19 |     87.5 |   66.66 |   76.19 | ...,89-99,114-124 
  list.ts          |   92.59 |    83.87 |      80 |   92.59 | ...62-164,180-181 
  reconnect.ts     |   78.85 |    66.66 |   85.71 |   78.85 | 42-55,169-191     
  remove.ts        |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 21-25             
 ...ommands/review |    85.1 |    86.35 |   85.85 |    85.1 |                   
  agent-prompt.ts  |   90.88 |    92.78 |      96 |   90.88 | ...1268,1738-1807 
  capture-local.ts |   68.57 |     90.9 |      75 |   68.57 | 107-111,158-189   
  ...k-coverage.ts |   48.38 |    14.28 |   66.66 |   48.38 | ...21-226,239-249 
  cleanup.ts       |   90.25 |    83.14 |   83.33 |   90.25 | ...77-482,484-485 
  ...ent-status.ts |   93.03 |    83.87 |   83.33 |   93.03 | 291,531-551       
  ...ose-review.ts |   95.85 |    91.25 |   93.75 |   95.85 | ...1439,1467-1489 
  fetch-pr.ts      |   74.02 |    53.57 |      50 |   74.02 | ...98,332,402-407 
  load-rules.ts    |   26.41 |      100 |   16.66 |   26.41 | ...41-153,155-156 
  parse-args.ts    |   99.27 |       96 |     100 |   99.27 | 345,417           
  plan-diff.ts     |   64.04 |      100 |   66.66 |   64.04 | 127-163           
  pr-context.ts    |   84.44 |    79.38 |   91.66 |   84.44 | ...29-910,939-941 
  presubmit.ts     |   83.75 |    92.72 |   88.88 |   83.75 | ...77-578,655-685 
  ...ve-anchors.ts |   77.02 |    88.46 |      75 |   77.02 | ...70-175,187-204 
  run.ts           |   81.14 |    86.17 |    90.9 |   81.14 | ...13,429-477,490 
  script-lint.ts   |   83.67 |    78.41 |   88.88 |   83.67 | ...59-773,775-797 
  submit.ts        |   76.74 |    82.05 |   81.81 |   76.74 | ...03-639,641-642 
  test-efficacy.ts |   87.11 |    83.43 |   93.33 |   87.11 | ...1394,1402-1422 
 ...nds/review/lib |   95.77 |    93.13 |   95.74 |   95.77 |                   
  agent-briefs.ts  |   98.68 |      100 |       0 |   98.68 | 520-521           
  anchors.ts       |     100 |    94.79 |     100 |     100 | ...33,169,178,225 
  coverage.ts      |   95.47 |    94.25 |   95.45 |   95.47 | ...98,335,433-450 
  diff-flags.ts    |     100 |        0 |     100 |     100 | 63                
  diff-plan.ts     |   98.73 |    93.01 |     100 |   98.73 | ...41,264,290-291 
  effort.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  gh.ts            |    85.6 |    88.37 |   71.42 |    85.6 | ...20,257-258,285 
  git.ts           |   97.64 |    95.65 |     100 |   97.64 | 180-181           
  heavy.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  inline-counts.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  local-diff.ts    |    84.4 |    88.46 |     100 |    84.4 | ...63-473,475-483 
  merge-base.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  path-rules.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  paths.ts         |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 70                
  prompt-record.ts |   94.73 |    88.23 |     100 |   94.73 | ...28,151-152,156 
  receipt.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  report.ts        |   94.38 |    93.75 |     100 |   94.38 | 173-177           
  roster.ts        |     100 |    94.23 |     100 |     100 | 143,161,206       
  shell-quote.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  test-utils.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  transcripts.ts   |   96.27 |    93.18 |     100 |   96.27 | ...83,269-270,294 
  workspaces.ts    |   97.76 |     91.2 |     100 |   97.76 | 186-187,212-213   
 ...mands/sessions |   91.56 |    86.95 |   83.33 |   91.56 |                   
  common.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  list.ts          |   90.96 |    86.66 |   81.81 |   90.96 | 208-219,221-222   
 src/config        |    94.2 |    88.75 |   95.91 |    94.2 |                   
  auth.ts          |   89.35 |    83.56 |     100 |   89.35 | ...97-298,314-315 
  ...eMcpImport.ts |   87.91 |    81.52 |     100 |   87.91 | ...63-371,453-454 
  compile-cache.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |   88.33 |    88.34 |   84.84 |   88.33 | ...2394,2396-2404 
  ...cy-monitor.ts |   88.75 |    76.19 |     100 |   88.75 | ...3,90-92,98,101 
  ...ust-policy.ts |   83.04 |    88.28 |     100 |   83.04 | ...39,253,352-353 
  ...heme-names.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  environment.ts   |   94.33 |    89.61 |   94.73 |   94.33 | ...35-639,655-656 
  ...le-watcher.ts |   90.86 |    83.65 |   95.83 |   90.86 | ...23-325,370,418 
  ...resh-state.ts |   90.57 |    97.29 |   93.75 |   90.57 | 137-142,146-152   
  ...ime-reload.ts |     100 |    69.69 |     100 |     100 | ...12-113,122-123 
  hot-reload.ts    |     100 |    89.13 |     100 |     100 | 47,172-178,238    
  keyBindings.ts   |   97.38 |       50 |     100 |   97.38 | 234-237           
  ...ngsAdapter.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 64                
  ...ig-watcher.ts |   95.17 |    83.05 |     100 |   95.17 | ...78,200,292-293 
  ...er-secrets.ts |   98.97 |    96.87 |     100 |   98.97 | 85                
  mcpApprovals.ts  |   96.55 |    95.55 |     100 |   96.55 | 223-224,229-231   
  mcpJson.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcpServers.ts    |   92.85 |     87.5 |     100 |   92.85 | 46-47             
  ...idersScope.ts |      95 |    94.73 |     100 |      95 | 11-12             
  ...abledTools.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...comparison.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...n-settings.ts |   99.15 |    93.75 |     100 |   99.15 | 63                
  sandboxConfig.ts |   61.64 |    71.87 |   66.66 |   61.64 | ...54-68,73,77-89 
  ...ings-cache.ts |   96.52 |    93.93 |     100 |   96.52 | 90-91,201-202     
  settings.ts      |   90.99 |     92.3 |      90 |   90.99 | ...1006,1008-1009 
  ...ingsSchema.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngsWatcher.ts |   95.54 |    88.34 |     100 |   95.54 | ...28,277-278,293 
  ...d-env-keys.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...l-settings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...paths-lite.ts |   89.47 |       88 |     100 |   89.47 | 43-44,53-54,56-57 
  ...tedFolders.ts |   93.35 |    94.11 |     100 |   93.35 | ...90-391,427-438 
 ...nfig/migration |   95.23 |    77.77 |   83.33 |   95.23 |                   
  index.ts         |   95.65 |     87.5 |     100 |   95.65 | 117-118           
  scheduler.ts     |   96.55 |    77.77 |     100 |   96.55 | 19-20             
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...ation/versions |   94.91 |      100 |     100 |   94.91 |                   
  ...-v2-shared.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  v1-to-v2.ts      |   81.75 |      100 |     100 |   81.75 | ...28-229,231-247 
  v2-to-v3.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  v3-to-v4.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  v5-to-v4.ts      |      96 |      100 |     100 |      96 | 94-95,99          
 src/core          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  auth.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  initializer.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  theme.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/dualOutput    |    71.8 |    70.31 |   66.66 |    71.8 |                   
  ...tputBridge.ts |   71.95 |    70.96 |   68.42 |   71.95 | ...08-409,417-420 
  ...utContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-8               
 src/export        |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-7               
 src/generated     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  git-commit.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/i18n          |   85.98 |    81.92 |   89.65 |   85.98 |                   
  index.ts         |   73.45 |    77.77 |      90 |   73.45 | ...70-271,294-299 
  languages.ts     |   93.07 |     92.3 |   85.71 |   93.07 | ...35,164-169,184 
  ...nslateKeys.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lationDict.ts |   93.33 |    66.66 |     100 |   93.33 | 15                
 src/i18n/locales  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ca.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  de.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  en.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  fr.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ja.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  pt.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ru.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zh-TW.js         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zh.js            |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...nonInteractive |      80 |    76.31 |   81.35 |      80 |                   
  session.ts       |   84.08 |    75.27 |   93.61 |   84.08 | ...1007,1016-1026 
  types.ts         |    42.5 |      100 |   33.33 |    42.5 | ...24-625,628-629 
 ...active/control |   76.11 |    89.09 |      80 |   76.11 |                   
  ...rolContext.ts |    6.45 |        0 |       0 |    6.45 | 56-95             
  ...Dispatcher.ts |   91.79 |    92.45 |   88.88 |   91.79 | ...49-367,387,390 
  ...rolService.ts |     7.4 |        0 |       0 |     7.4 | 46-185            
 ...ol/controllers |   39.78 |    63.24 |   47.22 |   39.78 |                   
  ...Controller.ts |   39.49 |      100 |      80 |   39.49 | 88-92,127-210     
  ...Controller.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-56              
  ...Controller.ts |   49.11 |    62.96 |   54.54 |   49.11 | ...63-568,570-575 
  ...Controller.ts |   14.06 |      100 |       0 |   14.06 | ...82-117,130-133 
  ...Controller.ts |   37.92 |    60.71 |   46.66 |   37.92 | ...41-653,662-691 
 .../control/types |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  serviceAPIs.ts   |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...Interactive/io |   98.07 |    94.05 |   95.23 |   98.07 |                   
  ...putAdapter.ts |   97.98 |     93.2 |   98.07 |   97.98 | ...1415,1431-1432 
  ...putAdapter.ts |      96 |    91.66 |   85.71 |      96 | 51-52             
  ...nputReader.ts |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 67                
  ...putAdapter.ts |   98.38 |      100 |   90.47 |   98.38 | 84-85,125-126     
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/patches       |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  is-in-ci.ts      |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-17              
 src/remoteInput   |   87.31 |    75.32 |   88.23 |   87.31 |                   
  ...utContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...putWatcher.ts |   88.01 |       76 |   93.33 |   88.01 | ...49-350,361-364 
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-8               
 src/serve         |   87.25 |    83.34 |   91.06 |   87.25 |                   
  ...tp-enabled.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-bridge.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  auth.ts          |    93.4 |    92.95 |     100 |    93.4 | ...19-320,323-325 
  ...em-adapter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  capabilities.ts  |     100 |    97.87 |     100 |     100 | 638               
  ...cp-command.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...horization.ts |   92.79 |    93.33 |    87.5 |   92.79 | 75-80,135-136     
  ...livery-ipc.ts |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 94,106,134        
  ...l-delivery.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...op-mcp-ipc.ts |   81.06 |    73.68 |   94.11 |   81.06 | ...37-242,267,289 
  ...nt-service.ts |   93.89 |    86.61 |     100 |   93.89 | ...66-468,475,477 
  ...-selection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ings-store.ts |   85.85 |    91.78 |   95.83 |   85.85 | ...94-206,366-369 
  ...ebhook-ipc.ts |    98.5 |    86.66 |     100 |    98.5 | 47                
  ...iagnostics.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...worker-env.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rker-group.ts |   87.27 |     85.2 |     100 |   87.27 | ...10,816-820,838 
  ...er-manager.ts |   89.39 |    83.88 |   93.33 |   89.39 | ...98,711,722-724 
  ...tartup-ipc.ts |   97.72 |    96.66 |     100 |   97.72 | 88-89             
  ...supervisor.ts |   92.41 |    84.44 |    97.1 |   92.41 | ...1460,1514-1518 
  ...e-grouping.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 69,132            
  core-runtime.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ub-session.ts |   92.04 |    77.77 |     100 |   92.04 | ...36-445,470,508 
  daemon-logger.ts |    82.2 |    77.26 |   91.76 |    82.2 | ...1720,1747-1753 
  ...trics-ring.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...s-provider.ts |   68.04 |    52.77 |     100 |   68.04 | ...44-249,282-290 
  daemon-status.ts |   98.37 |    90.06 |     100 |   98.37 | ...1041,1043-1044 
  debug-mode.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  demo.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  env-snapshot.ts  |    91.3 |       80 |     100 |    91.3 | ...24-127,205-212 
  ...-scheduler.ts |   87.34 |    83.87 |     100 |   87.34 | 33-36,48-50,79-81 
  ...-path-argv.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...h-settings.ts |   94.41 |    88.75 |     100 |   94.41 | ...24,702,718,728 
  fast-path.ts     |   90.33 |    80.23 |   95.45 |   90.33 | ...83-492,558-559 
  ...ration-sse.ts |   42.55 |    33.33 |     100 |   42.55 | 23-24,30,33-56    
  health-query.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-143             
  ...e-observer.ts |   89.89 |    83.24 |      96 |   89.89 | ...11-512,541-543 
  ...back-binds.ts |     100 |    88.88 |     100 |     100 | 32                
  ...-workspace.ts |    90.9 |    85.71 |     100 |    90.9 | ...27-128,139-140 
  ...iders-edit.ts |     100 |    82.14 |     100 |     100 | 58-60,65,81       
  ...ory-picker.ts |     100 |    86.95 |     100 |     100 | 36,66,92          
  ...sion-audit.ts |     100 |      100 |   93.33 |     100 |                   
  rate-limit.ts    |   92.77 |    88.42 |     100 |   92.77 | ...93-295,307-309 
  ...qwen-serve.ts |   82.64 |    79.24 |   74.06 |   82.64 | ...6725,6730-6731 
  ...tup-errors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-keepalive.ts |   94.19 |     87.5 |     100 |   94.19 | ...26,530-531,571 
  ...-lifecycle.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  server.ts        |    93.5 |    93.54 |   72.97 |    93.5 | ...2088,2109-2113 
  ...on-helpers.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t-event-id.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 12                
  ...-admission.ts |   98.71 |    89.65 |     100 |   98.71 | 68                
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...erver-name.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-limits.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t-sessions.ts |    93.3 |    76.57 |     100 |    93.3 | ...13,816,829-831 
  ...l-resolver.ts |   90.32 |    66.66 |     100 |   90.32 | 16,45-46          
  ...ell-static.ts |   91.07 |    86.66 |     100 |   91.07 | ...79-182,216-219 
  ...ace-agents.ts |   66.13 |    70.57 |   92.68 |   66.13 | ...2246,2256-2266 
  ...generation.ts |    95.4 |    82.35 |   66.66 |    95.4 | 55-56,78,92       
  ...-git-state.ts |     100 |    91.93 |    90.9 |     100 | 161,172,202,265   
  ...ace-inputs.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-summaries.ts |   86.66 |       50 |     100 |   86.66 | 11,19             
  ...ace-memory.ts |      83 |    74.54 |     100 |      83 | ...30-537,597-604 
  ...ers-status.ts |   98.58 |       79 |     100 |   98.58 | 106,134,174,177   
  ...tion-store.ts |   89.67 |    88.27 |   92.59 |   89.67 | ...91-400,411-414 
  ...e-registry.ts |   93.89 |     87.5 |     100 |   93.89 | ...18-519,525-526 
  ...ber-errors.ts |     100 |    95.32 |     100 |     100 | 53,93-94,172,192  
  ...e-remember.ts |   98.14 |    88.92 |     100 |   98.14 | ...31,335-340,381 
  ...te-runtime.ts |   83.98 |    90.19 |     100 |   83.98 | ...48-156,216-237 
  ...me-storage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...management.ts |   72.63 |    72.72 |      96 |   72.63 | ...88-889,896-900 
  ...ls-mapping.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lls-status.ts |     100 |    92.85 |     100 |     100 | 127               
  ...reconciler.ts |    91.6 |     83.9 |     100 |    91.6 | ...70-272,305-306 
 ...serve/acp-http |      77 |    78.26 |   93.19 |      77 |                   
  ...r-registry.ts |   96.92 |    94.87 |     100 |   96.92 | 184-187           
  client-mcp-ws.ts |   54.85 |    58.62 |   72.72 |   54.85 | ...99-300,304-305 
  ...n-registry.ts |    98.2 |    88.62 |     100 |    98.2 | 1015,1041-1052    
  dispatch.ts      |   71.44 |    73.89 |   95.34 |   71.44 | ...4733,4781-4787 
  index.ts         |   81.81 |    79.72 |   90.56 |   81.81 | ...2279,2349-2350 
  json-rpc.ts      |     100 |    96.96 |     100 |     100 | 92                
  safe-ws-send.ts  |   52.94 |    71.42 |     100 |   52.94 | 33-42,47-55       
  sse-stream.ts    |   93.96 |    88.57 |   84.61 |   93.96 | ...57-159,161-163 
  ...ort-stream.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  ws-stream.ts     |   91.86 |       80 |     100 |   91.86 | 45,50,96,100-103  
 src/serve/auth    |   86.86 |     79.7 |   93.87 |   86.86 |                   
  device-flow.ts   |   96.35 |    80.57 |   97.61 |   96.35 | ...1358,1453,1519 
  ...w-provider.ts |   44.24 |    74.07 |   71.42 |   44.24 | ...23-284,297,301 
 ...rve/cdp-tunnel |   85.73 |    73.17 |    97.5 |   85.73 |                   
  ...r-emulator.ts |   88.57 |    63.63 |     100 |   88.57 | ...72-175,194-195 
  ...verse-link.ts |      88 |    76.19 |     100 |      88 | ...28-329,420-423 
  ...l-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cdp-ws.ts        |   76.28 |    61.29 |    87.5 |   76.28 | ...13-217,223-228 
 ...nel/acceptance |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...mcp-smoke.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-119             
  ...cceptance.mjs |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-473             
  real-tab.mjs     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-218             
 src/serve/fs      |    86.4 |    80.69 |     100 |    86.4 |                   
  audit.ts         |     100 |    96.15 |     100 |     100 | 204               
  errors.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...x-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  paths.ts         |   77.64 |     73.8 |     100 |   77.64 | ...65,594-598,611 
  policy.ts        |   90.42 |    89.18 |     100 |   90.42 | 161-169           
  text-cursor.ts   |   88.23 |       90 |     100 |   88.23 | 74-77,92-95       
  ...ile-system.ts |   86.17 |    79.47 |     100 |   86.17 | ...2506,2516-2517 
 src/serve/routes  |   85.54 |    79.47 |   95.46 |   85.54 |                   
  a2ui-action.ts   |   96.84 |     88.5 |    87.5 |   96.84 | ...70-272,309-311 
  capabilities.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nel-notify.ts |   85.22 |       88 |     100 |   85.22 | ...,83-87,103-104 
  ...l-webhooks.ts |   93.56 |    84.09 |     100 |   93.56 | ...42,292,332,334 
  daemon-status.ts |   85.45 |    83.33 |     100 |   85.45 | 98-105            
  goals.ts         |   98.92 |     90.9 |     100 |   98.92 | 146               
  health-demo.ts   |   94.73 |     86.2 |     100 |   94.73 | 62-66,154         
  permission.ts    |     100 |     92.3 |     100 |     100 | 50,98             
  ...uled-tasks.ts |   87.12 |    82.73 |   92.59 |   87.12 | ...1263,1306-1307 
  ...on-runtime.ts |     100 |    90.47 |     100 |     100 | 58,94             
  session.ts       |   85.19 |    81.58 |   95.08 |   85.19 | ...4433,4435-4436 
  sse-events.ts    |   84.45 |     87.5 |   77.77 |   84.45 | ...36,453-456,485 
  usage-stats.ts   |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 118               
  ...space-auth.ts |   85.55 |    75.64 |     100 |   85.55 | ...21-326,331,345 
  ...el-control.ts |   86.26 |    78.94 |     100 |   86.26 | ...17-318,339-347 
  ...management.ts |   90.19 |    77.68 |     100 |   90.19 | ...47-448,467-468 
  ...d-contacts.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...controller.ts |   83.09 |       79 |      90 |   83.09 | ...1032,1038,1041 
  ...extensions.ts |   87.23 |    72.76 |   94.11 |   87.23 | ...1826,1871-1872 
  ...-file-read.ts |      91 |    80.91 |     100 |      91 | ...20-621,624-625 
  ...file-write.ts |   84.44 |    64.51 |     100 |   84.44 | ...73-275,355-357 
  ...t-branches.ts |   75.43 |    66.66 |     100 |   75.43 | ...13-618,627-634 
  ...e-git-diff.ts |   97.32 |    90.56 |     100 |   97.32 | 161-162,189-191   
  ...ce-git-log.ts |     100 |    93.18 |     100 |     100 | 52,77,188         
  workspace-git.ts |   77.08 |    89.65 |     100 |   77.08 | 97-118            
  ...github-prs.ts |   88.26 |    63.46 |     100 |   88.26 | ...38-239,264-265 
  ...-lifecycle.ts |   95.23 |    75.75 |     100 |   95.23 | ...50-151,186-187 
  ...management.ts |   88.15 |    85.19 |     100 |   88.15 | ...1537,1557-1562 
  ...cp-control.ts |    73.2 |    67.54 |   85.71 |    73.2 | ...27-633,644-645 
  ...ace-models.ts |   95.53 |    89.74 |     100 |   95.53 | ...52-157,296-297 
  ...ermissions.ts |    77.9 |    72.41 |     100 |    77.9 | ...69-277,298-316 
  ...e-settings.ts |   74.81 |    70.31 |     100 |   74.81 | ...47-658,664-665 
  ...tup-github.ts |   77.97 |    70.58 |   84.21 |   77.97 | ...46-352,397-398 
  ...ace-skills.ts |   69.87 |    78.12 |     100 |   69.87 | ...59-284,290-324 
  ...ace-status.ts |   82.94 |     74.5 |     100 |   82.94 | ...84-486,490-491 
  ...pace-tools.ts |   75.94 |    69.69 |   66.66 |   75.94 | ...59-164,193-194 
  ...pace-trust.ts |   78.42 |    64.78 |      80 |   78.42 | ...31-336,344-345 
  ...pace-voice.ts |   91.33 |    80.92 |     100 |   91.33 | ...70-673,676-678 
 src/serve/server  |   90.69 |    89.17 |   96.55 |   90.69 |                   
  access-log.ts    |   98.68 |     97.1 |     100 |   98.68 | 115,186           
  ...er-helpers.ts |   63.82 |    77.96 |   81.81 |   63.82 | ...16,330,332-347 
  ...w-registry.ts |    98.8 |    81.81 |     100 |    98.8 | 107               
  ...r-handlers.ts |   97.29 |       75 |     100 |   97.29 | 17                
  ...r-response.ts |   85.66 |    76.83 |     100 |   85.66 | ...02,719,782-791 
  fs-factory.ts    |     100 |    92.59 |     100 |     100 | 34,42,103,159     
  ...branch-ops.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t-deadline.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...iter-setup.ts |      65 |    73.33 |   33.33 |      65 | 30-35,38-43,47-48 
  ...st-helpers.ts |   95.11 |    95.14 |     100 |   95.11 | ...65-167,422-427 
  self-origin.ts   |   76.19 |       80 |     100 |   76.19 | 45-54             
  ...e-features.ts |   94.81 |    90.32 |     100 |   94.81 | 175-181           
  ...on-archive.ts |   89.55 |    87.78 |   97.14 |   89.55 | ...32-836,888-889 
  ...ion-export.ts |     100 |    94.44 |     100 |     100 | 64                
  session-list.ts  |   93.55 |    91.01 |     100 |   93.55 | ...79,681-687,827 
  telemetry.ts     |   99.01 |    97.45 |     100 |   99.01 | ...19,633,775-777 
 src/serve/voice   |   83.35 |    92.22 |   90.47 |   83.35 |                   
  ...ice-config.ts |   84.61 |       30 |     100 |   84.61 | 90-99,103-104     
  voice-ws.ts      |   77.16 |    94.73 |   83.33 |   77.16 | ...68,483,521-523 
  ...oordinator.ts |     100 |    98.21 |     100 |     100 | 176               
 ...kspace-service |   89.11 |    86.15 |   90.69 |   89.11 |                   
  index.ts         |   88.66 |    85.77 |   89.47 |   88.66 | ...1286-1290,1293 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/services      |   92.23 |     88.5 |   97.82 |   92.23 |                   
  ...mandLoader.ts |     100 |    88.88 |     100 |     100 | 104-117           
  ...killLoader.ts |   97.14 |    87.87 |     100 |   97.14 | 140,151-152       
  ...andService.ts |   98.73 |      100 |     100 |   98.73 | 107               
  ...mandLoader.ts |   86.83 |    83.87 |     100 |   86.83 | ...30-335,340-345 
  ...omptLoader.ts |   79.55 |    88.29 |   83.33 |   79.55 | ...48,178,245-246 
  ...mandLoader.ts |   97.36 |    92.68 |     100 |   97.36 | 153,160-161       
  ...nd-factory.ts |   91.42 |    91.66 |     100 |   91.42 | 128,137-144       
  ...ation-tool.ts |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 125               
  ...ndMetadata.ts |   98.23 |    96.72 |     100 |   98.23 | 83,87             
  commandUtils.ts  |      96 |     90.9 |     100 |      96 | 48                
  ...and-parser.ts |   90.69 |    85.71 |     100 |   90.69 | 63-66             
  ...ionService.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  prompt-stash.ts  |   96.66 |    92.85 |     100 |   96.66 | 34-35             
  ...tree-lease.ts |   88.29 |    86.48 |     100 |   88.29 | ...91-196,229-230 
  ...low-loader.ts |     100 |    96.15 |     100 |     100 | 88                
  setup-github.ts  |    90.8 |    80.95 |     100 |    90.8 | ...49-450,457-458 
  ...-args-file.ts |   93.54 |    90.47 |    87.5 |   93.54 | 201-203,217-223   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-keyterms.ts |   98.64 |    95.83 |     100 |   98.64 | 116,142-143       
  voice-model.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  voice-service.ts |   90.37 |    87.87 |     100 |   90.37 | ...80,287,352-357 
  ...e-settings.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 19                
  ...ranscriber.ts |   90.46 |    82.19 |      96 |   90.46 | ...66-668,671-673 
 ...rvices/insight |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  dates.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ght/generators |   88.91 |    86.29 |   96.15 |   88.91 |                   
  DataProcessor.ts |   88.28 |    86.24 |   94.73 |   88.28 | ...1352,1356-1363 
  ...tGenerator.ts |   98.24 |    85.71 |     100 |   98.24 | 47                
  ...teRenderer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 .../insight/types |       0 |       50 |      50 |       0 |                   
  ...sightTypes.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...sightTypes.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...mpt-processors |   97.27 |    94.04 |     100 |   97.27 |                   
  ...tProcessor.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...eProcessor.ts |   94.52 |    84.21 |     100 |   94.52 | 46-47,93-94       
  ...tionParser.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lProcessor.ts |   97.41 |    95.65 |     100 |   97.41 | 95-98             
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/services/tips |   97.27 |    84.61 |     100 |   97.27 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tipHistory.ts    |   92.59 |       70 |     100 |   92.59 | ...24,146,153,162 
  tipRegistry.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tipScheduler.ts  |     100 |    91.66 |     100 |     100 | 55                
 src/startup       |   88.99 |    83.47 |    90.9 |   88.99 |                   
  ...p-prefetch.ts |   98.09 |    94.23 |    87.5 |   98.09 | 50,209,225-226    
  ...reeStartup.ts |   80.53 |     74.6 |     100 |   80.53 | ...94,403,409-412 
 src/test-utils    |   93.26 |       75 |   83.33 |   93.26 |                   
  ci-env.ts        |      88 |     62.5 |     100 |      88 | 22-23,28          
  ...omMatchers.ts |   69.69 |       50 |      50 |   69.69 | 32-35,37-39,45-47 
  ...andContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  render.tsx       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui            |   72.11 |    75.58 |   64.63 |   72.11 |                   
  App.tsx          |   33.33 |       75 |   33.33 |   33.33 | 32-86             
  AppContainer.tsx |   73.26 |    72.45 |   67.85 |   73.26 | ...4122,4164-4174 
  ...tionNudge.tsx |    9.58 |      100 |       0 |    9.58 | 24-94             
  ...ackDialog.tsx |    30.3 |      100 |       0 |    30.3 | 26-76             
  ...tionNudge.tsx |    7.69 |      100 |       0 |    7.69 | 25-103            
  colors.ts        |      60 |      100 |   35.29 |      60 | ...52,54-55,60-61 
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  keyMatchers.ts   |   95.91 |    97.14 |     100 |   95.91 | 25-26             
  ...tic-colors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ractiveUI.tsx |   66.97 |    65.71 |   33.33 |   66.97 | ...77,292,323-328 
  ...inePresets.ts |   96.27 |    83.87 |     100 |   96.27 | ...97,402,410-412 
  textConstants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/auth       |   58.53 |    66.18 |   51.06 |   58.53 |                   
  AuthDialog.tsx   |   59.01 |     42.1 |   16.66 |   59.01 | ...25,332-354,358 
  ...nProgress.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-64              
  ...etupSteps.tsx |   60.21 |    70.73 |   57.69 |   60.21 | ...90,794,803,806 
  useAuth.ts       |    94.6 |    73.52 |     100 |    94.6 | ...21-222,241-247 
  ...rSetupFlow.ts |   43.18 |    33.33 |      50 |   43.18 | ...78-399,416-459 
 src/ui/commands   |    81.4 |    83.02 |    89.4 |    81.4 |                   
  aboutCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  agentsCommand.ts |   83.78 |      100 |      60 |   83.78 | 30-32,42-44       
  ...odeCommand.ts |    93.1 |    95.23 |     100 |    93.1 | 77-82             
  arenaCommand.ts  |   63.89 |    65.71 |   65.21 |   63.89 | ...01-606,691-699 
  authCommand.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  branchCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  btwCommand.ts    |   94.32 |    81.25 |     100 |   94.32 | 35-36,114-119     
  bugCommand.ts    |     100 |    77.77 |     100 |     100 | 27,61             
  cdCommand.ts     |   92.46 |    83.63 |     100 |   92.46 | ...4-69,94-99,178 
  clearCommand.ts  |    80.9 |    70.83 |     100 |    80.9 | ...24-125,133-142 
  ...essCommand.ts |   67.95 |    55.88 |      75 |   67.95 | ...86-187,201-204 
  ...astCommand.ts |   84.17 |       75 |     100 |   84.17 | ...,91-97,125-130 
  ...ig-command.ts |   93.12 |    88.42 |     100 |   93.12 | ...07-315,321-323 
  ...extCommand.ts |   68.28 |    70.14 |   84.61 |   68.28 | ...66-599,610-611 
  copyCommand.ts   |    98.7 |    96.29 |     100 |    98.7 | 66-67,172,272,323 
  deleteCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  diffCommand.ts   |     100 |    87.87 |     100 |     100 | ...63,231-232,245 
  ...ryCommand.tsx |   81.64 |    87.67 |    90.9 |   81.64 | ...73-278,325-332 
  docsCommand.ts   |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 25                
  doctorCommand.ts |   65.37 |    81.88 |   94.11 |   65.37 | ...85-535,538-672 
  dreamCommand.ts  |   85.45 |    88.88 |     100 |   85.45 | 58-65             
  editorCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rt-command.ts |   82.97 |    78.57 |     100 |   82.97 | 47-52,67-70,91-96 
  exportCommand.ts |   98.25 |    91.02 |     100 |   98.25 | ...81,198-199,364 
  ...onsCommand.ts |   52.31 |    56.25 |   69.23 |   52.31 | ...09,277-329,390 
  forgetCommand.ts |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 59                
  forkCommand.ts   |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 96,147            
  goalCommand.ts   |   91.13 |    83.72 |      90 |   91.13 | ...81-184,196-199 
  helpCommand.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...oryCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  hooksCommand.ts  |   81.13 |    65.71 |   85.71 |   81.13 | ...,86-93,131-132 
  ideCommand.ts    |   60.75 |    64.28 |   41.17 |   60.75 | ...05-306,310-324 
  ...figCommand.ts |   52.83 |    81.25 |      70 |   52.83 | ...74-319,321-330 
  initCommand.ts   |   91.86 |       80 |     100 |   91.86 | 48,83-88          
  ...ghtCommand.ts |   77.87 |    71.42 |     100 |   77.87 | ...44-245,250-272 
  ...ageCommand.ts |   93.45 |    89.06 |     100 |   93.45 | ...68-169,196-206 
  learn-command.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  lspCommand.ts    |     100 |    86.95 |     100 |     100 | 31,101-102        
  mcpCommand.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  memoryCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  modelCommand.ts  |   86.27 |    83.01 |     100 |   86.27 | ...22-935,969-974 
  ...onsCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  planCommand.ts   |   78.82 |    76.92 |     100 |   78.82 | 30-35,51-56,68-73 
  quitCommand.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  recapCommand.ts  |   21.81 |      100 |      50 |   21.81 | 24-73             
  ...ns-command.ts |   98.83 |    81.81 |     100 |   98.83 | 100               
  ...berCommand.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 46                
  renameCommand.ts |   89.06 |    88.37 |     100 |   89.06 | ...72-176,202-209 
  ...oreCommand.ts |    90.9 |    86.04 |     100 |    90.9 | ...41-146,176-177 
  resumeCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  rewindCommand.ts |   81.25 |      100 |      50 |   81.25 | 20-22             
  ...ngsCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...hubCommand.ts |   89.47 |       75 |      80 |   89.47 | 54-59             
  skillsCommand.ts |   78.82 |    81.81 |     100 |   78.82 | 37-52,78,97       
  statsCommand.ts  |   90.65 |    76.73 |     100 |   90.65 | ...30-733,825-832 
  ...ineCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...aryCommand.ts |    6.43 |      100 |      50 |    6.43 | 31-330            
  tasksCommand.ts  |   77.22 |    72.13 |     100 |   77.22 | ...46-150,172-177 
  ...tupCommand.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  themeCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  toolsCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  trustCommand.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...te-command.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 74,148            
  vimCommand.ts    |   54.54 |      100 |      50 |   54.54 | 19-29             
  voice-command.ts |   93.57 |       88 |     100 |   93.57 | 35,97-102         
  ...owsCommand.ts |   91.82 |    78.87 |   66.66 |   91.82 | ...59-160,169-174 
 src/ui/components |   70.64 |    78.44 |   76.29 |   70.64 |                   
  AboutBox.tsx     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ateScreen.tsx |   97.29 |     87.5 |   66.66 |   97.29 | 49                
  AnsiOutput.tsx   |   65.57 |      100 |      50 |   65.57 | 69-90             
  ApiKeyInput.tsx  |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-97              
  AppHeader.tsx    |    88.7 |       75 |     100 |    88.7 | 36,38-43,45       
  ...odeDialog.tsx |   87.24 |    72.22 |   33.33 |   87.24 | ...85,233-238,245 
  AsciiArt.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Indicator.tsx |   95.65 |    66.66 |     100 |   95.65 | 27,52             
  ...TextInput.tsx |   88.65 |    90.41 |     100 |   88.65 | ...84-286,300-302 
  Composer.tsx     |   94.49 |    66.66 |     100 |   94.49 | ...-72,84,139,153 
  ...entPrompt.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ryDisplay.tsx |   75.89 |    62.06 |     100 |   75.89 | ...,88,93-108,113 
  ...geDisplay.tsx |   68.42 |    57.14 |     100 |   68.42 | 16-17,31-32,42-50 
  CronPill.tsx     |     100 |    93.75 |     100 |     100 | 19                
  ...ification.tsx |      84 |       60 |     100 |      84 | 23-24,40-42       
  ...gProfiler.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-36              
  ...ogManager.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-597             
  DiffDialog.tsx   |    53.5 |     37.5 |   69.23 |    53.5 | ...32-737,747-760 
  ...ngsDialog.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-195             
  EffortDialog.tsx |   97.36 |      100 |     100 |   97.36 | 55-56             
  ExitWarning.tsx  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...hProgress.tsx |    87.8 |    33.33 |     100 |    87.8 | 28-31,56          
  ...ustDialog.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  Footer.tsx       |   75.11 |     61.4 |      50 |   75.11 | ...48-253,271-275 
  ...ngSpinner.tsx |   68.42 |    85.71 |      50 |   68.42 | 35-52,73,80-81    
  GoalPill.tsx     |   83.33 |    76.92 |     100 |   83.33 | 24-30             
  Header.tsx       |   98.65 |    94.73 |     100 |   98.65 | 173,175           
  Help.tsx         |   98.33 |       90 |     100 |   98.33 | ...25,382,448-449 
  ...emDisplay.tsx |   78.51 |     65.3 |     100 |   78.51 | ...99,502,505-511 
  ...ngeDialog.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  InputPrompt.tsx  |   83.08 |    81.73 |      80 |   83.08 | ...2197,2223,2297 
  ...Shortcuts.tsx |   20.65 |      100 |       0 |   20.65 | ...7,50-52,68-126 
  ...Indicator.tsx |   98.18 |    97.82 |     100 |   98.18 | 161-162           
  ...firmation.tsx |   91.42 |      100 |      50 |   91.42 | 26-31             
  MainContent.tsx  |   95.82 |    92.53 |      50 |   95.82 | ...97,440-444,447 
  MemoryDialog.tsx |   86.59 |    80.15 |     100 |   86.59 | ...34-435,485,553 
  ...geDisplay.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-41              
  ModelDialog.tsx  |   83.41 |    71.65 |     100 |   83.41 | ...69,971,976-992 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |     100 |    97.22 |     100 |     100 | 270               
  ...fications.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-56              
  ...onsDialog.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-1004            
  ...ryDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...icePrompt.tsx |   92.64 |    85.71 |     100 |   92.64 | 102-106,134-139   
  PrepareLabel.tsx |   91.66 |    77.27 |     100 |   91.66 | 73-75,77-79,110   
  ...atePrompt.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-134             
  ...geDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngDisplay.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-39              
  ...hProgress.tsx |   85.25 |    88.46 |     100 |   85.25 | 121-147           
  ...dSelector.tsx |   92.79 |    82.65 |     100 |   92.79 | ...19-323,354-370 
  ...ionPicker.tsx |   83.66 |    72.13 |     100 |   83.66 | ...96,402,444-466 
  ...onPreview.tsx |   93.58 |    83.78 |     100 |   93.58 | ...,70-71,195-197 
  ...ryDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...putPrompt.tsx |   72.56 |       80 |      40 |   72.56 | ...06-109,114-117 
  ...tedDialog.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngsDialog.tsx |   71.49 |    73.89 |   69.23 |   71.49 | ...1244,1250-1251 
  ...ionDialog.tsx |    92.3 |    96.15 |   33.33 |    92.3 | 60-63,68-75,164   
  ...putPrompt.tsx |    15.9 |      100 |       0 |    15.9 | 20-63             
  ...Indicator.tsx |   57.14 |      100 |       0 |   57.14 | 12-15             
  ...MoreLines.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-40              
  ...iewDialog.tsx |   97.77 |    87.67 |     100 |   97.77 | ...97,305-307,324 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |   95.86 |       75 |     100 |   95.86 | 67-71             
  ...ionPicker.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-172             
  ...tivityTab.tsx |    3.94 |      100 |       0 |    3.94 | 27-275            
  StatsDialog.tsx  |    8.64 |      100 |       0 |    8.64 | ...76-111,130-322 
  StatsDisplay.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ciencyTab.tsx |    78.9 |    56.52 |     100 |    78.9 | ...26,213,262-288 
  ...atmapView.tsx |    8.98 |      100 |       0 |    8.98 | 20-107            
  ...essionTab.tsx |      80 |    66.66 |     100 |      80 | ...70-277,283-300 
  ...ineDialog.tsx |    93.5 |    85.18 |     100 |    93.5 | ...05,267,287-289 
  ...yTodoList.tsx |   96.36 |    88.23 |     100 |   96.36 | 138-141           
  ...nsDisplay.tsx |   92.97 |    83.87 |     100 |   92.97 | ...43,246,273-275 
  ThemeDialog.tsx  |   89.95 |    46.15 |      75 |   89.95 | ...71-173,243-245 
  Tips.tsx         |   93.54 |       75 |     100 |   93.54 | 39-40             
  TodoDisplay.tsx  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 31-32             
  ...criptView.tsx |   98.27 |    84.21 |     100 |   98.27 | 45,53             
  TrustDialog.tsx  |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 72-87             
  ...ification.tsx |   36.36 |      100 |       0 |   36.36 | 15-22             
  ...Indicator.tsx |    92.5 |     87.5 |     100 |    92.5 | 50-53             
  ...ackDialog.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-134             
  ...xitDialog.tsx |   80.36 |    43.47 |      60 |   80.36 | ...24-238,248-251 
  ...odeVisuals.ts |   97.22 |    85.71 |     100 |   97.22 | 25                
  ...s-helpers.tsx |   66.25 |    81.25 |      50 |   66.25 | 25-32,46-53,62-72 
 ...nts/agent-view |   53.72 |    70.87 |   42.85 |   53.72 |                   
  ...atContent.tsx |    9.09 |      100 |       0 |    9.09 | 54-275,281-283    
  ...tChatView.tsx |   21.05 |      100 |       0 |   21.05 | 21-39             
  ...tComposer.tsx |   64.78 |    29.41 |   33.33 |   64.78 | ...51,269,277-279 
  AgentFooter.tsx  |   15.38 |      100 |       0 |   15.38 | 28-65             
  AgentHeader.tsx  |   15.38 |      100 |       0 |   15.38 | 27-64             
  AgentTabBar.tsx  |    87.9 |    63.88 |     100 |    87.9 | ...88,110-118,136 
  ...oryAdapter.ts |     100 |    91.83 |     100 |     100 | 103,109-110,138   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-12              
 ...mponents/arena |    42.3 |    68.69 |   73.68 |    42.3 |                   
  ArenaCards.tsx   |   73.06 |    71.79 |   85.71 |   73.06 | ...83-185,321-326 
  ...ectDialog.tsx |   83.48 |    69.86 |   88.88 |   83.48 | ...88-392,409-410 
  ...artDialog.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-166             
  ...tusDialog.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-288             
  ...topDialog.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-213             
 ...ackground-view |    82.2 |    81.36 |    90.9 |    82.2 |                   
  ...sksDialog.tsx |   77.53 |     76.9 |   80.76 |   77.53 | ...1781,1803-1809 
  ...TasksPill.tsx |   67.03 |     86.2 |     100 |   67.03 | ...02-122,130-138 
  ...gentPanel.tsx |   97.08 |    86.31 |     100 |   97.08 | 132,442-446,520   
  agent-forest.ts  |    99.2 |    93.93 |     100 |    99.2 | 258               
  ...Visibility.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-overlay.tsx |    88.2 |    76.47 |     100 |    88.2 | ...36-138,140-142 
 ...nts/extensions |   84.32 |    76.78 |   83.33 |   84.32 |                   
  ...gerDialog.tsx |   82.15 |    76.08 |     100 |   82.15 | ...91-198,258,260 
  TabBar.tsx       |   97.29 |    88.88 |     100 |   97.29 | 33                
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-12              
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...tensions/steps |   46.26 |       85 |   58.82 |   46.26 |                   
  ...ctionStep.tsx |   95.12 |    92.85 |   85.71 |   95.12 | 84-86,89          
  ...etailStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-145             
  ...nListStep.tsx |   75.26 |    88.37 |   66.66 |   75.26 | ...53,174,203-209 
  ...electStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-83              
  ...nfirmStep.tsx |   16.32 |      100 |       0 |   16.32 | 28-74             
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-11              
 ...xtensions/tabs |   71.92 |    68.14 |   70.83 |   71.92 |                   
  DiscoverTab.tsx  |   68.22 |    67.66 |   55.55 |   68.22 | ...93,656-660,664 
  InstalledTab.tsx |   75.49 |    67.28 |   83.33 |   75.49 | ...77,782-783,820 
  SourcesTab.tsx   |   71.67 |    70.47 |   77.77 |   71.67 | ...28,547,621-633 
 ...tensions/views |   50.97 |    52.38 |   20.83 |   50.97 |                   
  ...tionsView.tsx |   73.75 |    56.36 |   66.66 |   73.75 | ...30,353,369-374 
  ...tionsView.tsx |   43.45 |    44.82 |    6.66 |   43.45 | ...98-405,408-420 
  ...etailView.tsx |    9.56 |      100 |       0 |    9.56 | 40-67,70-158      
 ...mponents/hooks |   86.99 |    81.37 |   91.89 |   86.99 |                   
  ...rListBody.tsx |   95.29 |    85.18 |     100 |   95.29 | 95-98             
  ...etailStep.tsx |   75.32 |    71.42 |      60 |   75.32 | ...56-169,173-186 
  ...etailStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rListStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entHeader.tsx |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 47                
  ...rListStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...etailStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...abledStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sListStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entDialog.tsx |   72.29 |    70.49 |     100 |   72.29 | ...51,563-568,572 
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-13              
  ...erGrouping.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sourceLabels.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...components/mcp |   40.04 |    61.53 |   70.58 |   40.04 |                   
  ...ealthPill.tsx |   68.42 |    85.71 |     100 |   68.42 | 40-46             
  ...entDialog.tsx |   32.09 |    26.19 |      40 |   32.09 | ...12,914,927-933 
  ...valDialog.tsx |   15.06 |      100 |       0 |   15.06 | 40-109            
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-35              
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  utils.ts         |      97 |       95 |     100 |      97 | 24,113-114        
 ...ents/mcp/steps |   53.94 |    73.51 |   57.14 |   53.94 |                   
  ...icateStep.tsx |    5.65 |      100 |       0 |    5.65 | 40-66,69-308      
  ...electStep.tsx |   10.95 |      100 |       0 |   10.95 | 16-88             
  ...etailStep.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...eListStep.tsx |   99.09 |    97.36 |     100 |   99.09 | 71                
  ...etailStep.tsx |   62.83 |       60 |   33.33 |   62.83 | ...87-296,307-332 
  ...rListStep.tsx |   88.53 |    81.25 |     100 |   88.53 | ...64,170,175-180 
  ...etailStep.tsx |    10.3 |      100 |       0 |    10.3 | ...1,67-79,82-140 
  ToolListStep.tsx |   69.29 |       50 |     100 |   69.29 | ...23,126,135-144 
 ...nents/messages |   89.97 |    86.16 |      87 |   89.97 |                   
  ...ionDialog.tsx |   89.23 |    84.27 |   81.81 |   89.23 | ...75,593,611-613 
  BtwMessage.tsx   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...upDisplay.tsx |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | ...43,289,402,432 
  ...onMessage.tsx |   92.06 |    82.35 |     100 |   92.06 | 58-60,62,64       
  ...nMessages.tsx |   96.71 |    97.77 |   91.66 |   96.71 | 223-233           
  DiffRenderer.tsx |   93.17 |    86.02 |     100 |   93.17 | ...07,235-236,302 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |   97.08 |    77.77 |     100 |   97.08 | 95,97,106         
  ...usMessage.tsx |   76.52 |     42.1 |   66.66 |   76.52 | ...00,102,125,156 
  ...tsDisplay.tsx |   95.52 |    88.31 |     100 |   95.52 | ...40,142,175-180 
  ...ssMessage.tsx |    12.5 |      100 |       0 |    12.5 | 18-59             
  ...edMessage.tsx |   21.05 |      100 |       0 |   21.05 | 23-39             
  ...sMessages.tsx |   59.04 |       50 |    37.5 |   59.04 | ...21-126,147-159 
  ...ryMessage.tsx |   13.63 |      100 |       0 |   13.63 | 23-64             
  ...onMessage.tsx |   89.75 |     79.1 |     100 |   89.75 | ...33-635,642-644 
  ...upMessage.tsx |   98.32 |    95.16 |     100 |   98.32 | 184-187,414       
  ToolMessage.tsx  |   92.49 |    84.92 |   93.33 |   92.49 | ...61-966,993-995 
 ...ponents/shared |   85.76 |    82.09 |   94.05 |   85.76 |                   
  ...ctionList.tsx |     100 |      100 |      75 |     100 |                   
  ...tonSelect.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  EnumSelector.tsx |     100 |    96.42 |     100 |     100 | 58                
  ...rBoundary.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  MaxSizedBox.tsx  |   84.71 |    86.86 |      90 |   84.71 | ...67-568,685-686 
  MultiSelect.tsx  |   93.58 |       75 |     100 |   93.58 | ...43,199-201,211 
  ...tonSelect.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ontroller.tsx |     100 |    83.33 |     100 |     100 | 73,93-95          
  ...eSelector.tsx |     100 |       60 |     100 |     100 | 40-45             
  ...lableList.tsx |   81.48 |    84.84 |     100 |   81.48 | 46-66,73-76       
  StaticRender.tsx |   72.72 |      100 |     100 |   72.72 | 31-33             
  TextInput.tsx    |    80.8 |    67.24 |      80 |    80.8 | ...36-240,252-258 
  ...ontroller.tsx |     100 |    81.81 |     100 |     100 | 59-62             
  ...apsedTime.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Indicator.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lizedList.tsx |   88.51 |    85.11 |   81.81 |   88.51 | ...51-779,792,887 
  text-buffer.ts   |   85.98 |    81.81 |   97.91 |   85.98 | ...2664,2762-2763 
  ...er-actions.ts |   73.93 |    67.22 |     100 |   73.93 | ...32-733,934-936 
 ...ponents/skills |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...gerDialog.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-681             
 ...ents/subagents |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  constants.ts     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-71              
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-11              
  reducers.tsx     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-190             
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-125             
  utils.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-102             
 ...bagents/create |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...ionWizard.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-299             
  ...rSelector.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-85              
  ...onSummary.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-331             
  ...tionInput.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-177             
  ...dSelector.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-63              
  ...nSelector.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-58              
  ...EntryStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-78              
  ToolSelector.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-253             
 ...bagents/manage |   14.14 |    53.19 |    37.5 |   14.14 |                   
  ...ctionStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-103             
  ...eleteStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-62              
  ...tEditStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-124             
  ...ctionStep.tsx |   35.61 |    59.52 |     100 |   35.61 | ...21-433,438-440 
  ...iewerStep.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-73              
  ...gerDialog.tsx |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-341             
 ...mponents/views |   69.81 |    72.64 |   61.11 |   69.81 |                   
  ContextUsage.tsx |   70.88 |    63.88 |      80 |   70.88 | ...20-426,463-557 
  DoctorReport.tsx |     9.8 |      100 |       0 |     9.8 | 25-54,57-131      
  ...sionsList.tsx |   88.05 |       75 |     100 |   88.05 | 70-77             
  McpStatus.tsx    |   92.01 |     73.8 |     100 |   92.01 | ...36,175-177,262 
  SkillsList.tsx   |   20.51 |      100 |       0 |   20.51 | 17-20,27-57       
  ToolsList.tsx    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/contexts   |   84.11 |    81.79 |    86.3 |   84.11 |                   
  ...ewContext.tsx |   64.83 |    88.88 |      50 |   64.83 | ...16-219,225-235 
  AppContext.tsx   |      80 |       50 |     100 |      80 | 19-20             
  ...ewContext.tsx |   92.45 |    62.79 |      50 |   92.45 | ...69-270,272-276 
  ...igContext.tsx |   81.81 |       50 |     100 |   81.81 | 15-16             
  ...ssContext.tsx |   85.92 |    85.15 |     100 |   85.92 | ...1607-1609,1615 
  ...owContext.tsx |   91.07 |    81.81 |     100 |   91.07 | 47-48,60-62       
  ...deContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |      50 |     100 |                   
  ...onContext.tsx |   80.77 |       80 |    92.3 |   80.77 | ...31-434,443-446 
  ...gsContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...usContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ngContext.tsx |   71.42 |       50 |     100 |   71.42 | 17-20             
  ...utContext.tsx |   85.71 |      100 |   66.66 |   85.71 | 13-14             
  ...edContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |      50 |     100 |                   
  ...nsContext.tsx |   88.88 |       50 |     100 |   88.88 | 155-156           
  ...teContext.tsx |   86.66 |       50 |     100 |   86.66 | 234-235           
  ...deContext.tsx |      80 |     87.5 |      75 |      80 | ...11-112,118-120 
  ...rtContext.tsx |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/daemon     |   88.35 |    73.51 |   95.45 |   88.35 |                   
  ...ui-adapter.ts |   88.35 |    73.51 |   95.45 |   88.35 | ...74,792-793,879 
 src/ui/editors    |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...ngsManager.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-67              
 src/ui/hooks      |   84.95 |    82.54 |   89.57 |   84.95 |                   
  ...dProcessor.ts |   83.95 |    83.95 |     100 |   83.95 | ...39-871,918-919 
  ...ention-ref.ts |   97.72 |       84 |     100 |   97.72 | 65                
  keyToAnsi.ts     |    3.92 |      100 |       0 |    3.92 | 19-77             
  ...esourceRef.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...completion.ts |     100 |    95.45 |     100 |     100 | 95                
  ...ention-ref.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...dProcessor.ts |   94.62 |    73.58 |     100 |   94.62 | ...86-287,292-293 
  ...dProcessor.ts |   85.21 |     66.4 |   81.81 |   85.21 | ...1407,1428-1432 
  ...rt-command.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sced-flush.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...oice-input.ts |   92.36 |    81.95 |   66.66 |   92.36 | ...00,502-503,658 
  ...ke-repaint.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...amingState.ts |   12.22 |      100 |       0 |   12.22 | 54-157            
  ...agerDialog.ts |   88.23 |      100 |     100 |   88.23 | 20,24             
  ...dScrollbar.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ationFrame.ts |      42 |       75 |     100 |      42 | 42-44,53-59,62-87 
  ...odeCommand.ts |   58.82 |      100 |     100 |   58.82 | 28,33-48          
  ...enaCommand.ts |      85 |      100 |     100 |      85 | 23-24,29          
  ...aInProcess.ts |   27.92 |       80 |      25 |   27.92 | ...69-170,173-175 
  ...Completion.ts |   86.44 |    88.48 |     100 |   86.44 | ...14-515,525-541 
  ...ifications.ts |   87.82 |    96.77 |     100 |   87.82 | 138-152           
  ...tIndicator.ts |   88.28 |    81.08 |     100 |   88.28 | ...66,175,179-187 
  ...waySummary.ts |   96.26 |       75 |     100 |   96.26 | 126-128,170       
  ...ndTaskView.ts |   94.73 |    76.59 |     100 |   94.73 | 162-166,255,261   
  ...chedScroll.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ketedPaste.ts |    23.8 |      100 |       0 |    23.8 | 19-37             
  ...nchCommand.ts |   94.85 |    80.76 |     100 |   94.85 | ...54,229,292-295 
  ...ompletion.tsx |   97.09 |    87.09 |     100 |   97.09 | ...23-324,334-335 
  ...dMigration.ts |    92.1 |    88.88 |     100 |    92.1 | 42-44             
  useCompletion.ts |   96.29 |    90.56 |     100 |   96.29 | ...17-218,222-223 
  ...nitMessage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...extualTips.ts |   78.26 |       50 |     100 |   78.26 | ...2,75-79,96-104 
  ...eteCommand.ts |   78.53 |    88.57 |     100 |   78.53 | ...96-104,112-113 
  ...ialogClose.ts |   36.11 |       10 |     100 |   36.11 | ...89-195,202-207 
  useDiffData.ts   |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-87              
  ...oublePress.ts |   53.12 |       75 |     100 |   53.12 | 33-35,41-54       
  ...orSettings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Completion.ts |   99.12 |    97.67 |     100 |   99.12 | 182-183           
  ...ionUpdates.ts |   93.72 |    92.98 |     100 |   93.72 | ...87-291,314-320 
  ...agerDialog.ts |   88.88 |      100 |     100 |   88.88 | 21,25             
  ...backDialog.ts |    63.9 |    76.47 |   66.66 |    63.9 | ...66-168,190-191 
  useFocus.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...olderTrust.ts |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 62                
  ...ggestions.tsx |   96.47 |    78.94 |     100 |   96.47 | 121,155-156       
  ...miniStream.ts |   85.66 |    81.38 |   96.15 |   85.66 | ...3943,4111-4119 
  ...BranchName.ts |     100 |    94.44 |     100 |     100 | 54                
  ...oryManager.ts |   98.01 |    98.36 |     100 |   98.01 | 139-142           
  ...ooksDialog.ts |    87.5 |      100 |     100 |    87.5 | 19,23             
  ...stListener.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nAuthError.ts |   76.19 |       50 |     100 |   76.19 | 39-40,43-45       
  ...putHistory.ts |   92.59 |    85.71 |     100 |   92.59 | 63-64,72,94-96    
  ...storyStore.ts |     100 |    94.11 |     100 |     100 | 69                
  useKeypress.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rdProtocol.ts |   36.36 |      100 |       0 |   36.36 | 24-31             
  ...unchEditor.ts |    9.67 |      100 |       0 |    9.67 | 11-32,39-90       
  ...gIndicator.ts |     100 |    96.66 |     100 |     100 | 109               
  useLogger.ts     |      16 |      100 |       0 |      16 | 15-45             
  useMCPHealth.ts  |   63.15 |       80 |      50 |   63.15 | 42-52,64-67       
  ...cpApproval.ts |   93.12 |    86.11 |     100 |   93.12 | ...24-127,139-140 
  useMcpDialog.ts  |    87.5 |      100 |     100 |    87.5 | 19,23             
  ...moryDialog.ts |    87.5 |      100 |     100 |    87.5 | 19,23             
  ...oryMonitor.ts |   83.14 |    78.57 |     100 |   83.14 | 54-63,74-79       
  ...ssageQueue.ts |     100 |     97.5 |     100 |     100 | 99                
  ...delCommand.ts |     100 |       95 |     100 |     100 | 53                
  ...ouseEvents.ts |   94.38 |    97.36 |   83.33 |   94.38 | 77-81             
  ...raseCycler.ts |   84.74 |    76.47 |     100 |   84.74 | ...49,52-53,69-71 
  ...rredEditor.ts |   58.33 |    22.22 |     100 |   58.33 | 23-27,29-33       
  ...derUpdates.ts |    87.4 |    78.78 |     100 |    87.4 | ...71,321-333,381 
  useQwenAuth.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lScheduler.ts |   88.95 |    86.95 |     100 |   88.95 | ...37-439,471-481 
  ...oryCommand.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-7               
  ...umeCommand.ts |   94.67 |    74.28 |     100 |   94.67 | ...19,174,233-238 
  ...ompletion.tsx |   90.67 |    83.33 |     100 |   90.67 | ...02,105,138-141 
  ...ectionList.ts |   97.12 |    96.22 |     100 |   97.12 | ...92-193,247-250 
  ...sionPicker.ts |   92.87 |    90.35 |     100 |   92.87 | ...99-501,503-505 
  ...earchInput.ts |     100 |    97.29 |     100 |     100 | 82                
  ...ngsCommand.ts |   18.75 |      100 |       0 |   18.75 | 10-25             
  ...ellHistory.ts |   93.28 |    80.95 |     100 |   93.28 | ...96,153-154,164 
  ...oryCommand.ts |   85.48 |    58.33 |     100 |   85.48 | 22-28,40,71       
  ...agerDialog.ts |   88.23 |      100 |     100 |   88.23 | 20,24             
  ...Completion.ts |   82.85 |    85.13 |   94.73 |   82.85 | ...78-680,688-724 
  ...tateAndRef.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tatsDialog.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  useStatusLine.ts |   97.13 |    93.33 |     100 |   97.13 | ...78-382,478-485 
  ...eateDialog.ts |   88.23 |      100 |     100 |   88.23 | 14,18             
  ...mInProcess.ts |   27.35 |       80 |      25 |   27.35 | ...82-183,186-188 
  ...tification.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 50                
  ...alProgress.ts |   67.34 |    58.82 |   66.66 |   67.34 | 52-53,61-68,79-85 
  ...rminalSize.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...emeCommand.ts |   67.01 |    29.41 |     100 |   67.01 | ...10-111,115-116 
  useTimer.ts      |   97.59 |    94.73 |     100 |   97.59 | 17-18             
  ...lMigration.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...rustModify.ts |     100 |    90.47 |     100 |     100 | 112,134           
  useTurnDiffs.ts  |   95.12 |    78.57 |     100 |   95.12 | 133-134,156-157   
  ...elcomeBack.ts |   87.36 |     90.9 |     100 |   87.36 | ...,94-96,114-115 
  ...reeSession.ts |   93.75 |       70 |     100 |   93.75 | 47-48,72          
  vim.ts           |      74 |    67.56 |   69.23 |      74 | ...1854-1861,1869 
 src/ui/layouts    |    91.2 |    89.47 |     100 |    91.2 |                   
  ...AppLayout.tsx |    90.9 |     87.5 |     100 |    90.9 | 60-62,110-115,151 
  ...AppLayout.tsx |   91.66 |    92.85 |     100 |   91.66 | 75-80             
 src/ui/models     |   80.72 |       80 |   71.42 |   80.72 |                   
  ...ableModels.ts |   80.72 |       80 |   71.42 |   80.72 | ...,61-71,125-127 
 ...noninteractive |     100 |      100 |    6.66 |     100 |                   
  ...eractiveUi.ts |     100 |      100 |    6.66 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/selection  |   86.47 |    79.88 |   96.66 |   86.47 |                   
  screen-buffer.ts |   94.73 |    64.28 |     100 |   94.73 | 51-52             
  ...ion-coords.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ction-span.ts |   92.72 |       90 |     100 |   92.72 | 37-38,67-68       
  ...tion-state.ts |   85.71 |      100 |   88.88 |   85.71 | 51-58             
  ...ction-text.ts |   92.85 |    92.45 |     100 |   92.85 | 30-34,114-115     
  ...selection.tsx |   80.31 |    59.64 |     100 |   80.31 | ...13-314,330-331 
 src/ui/state      |      95 |    81.81 |     100 |      95 |                   
  extensions.ts    |      95 |    81.81 |     100 |      95 | 69-70,89          
 src/ui/themes     |    98.5 |    73.17 |     100 |    98.5 |                   
  ansi-light.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ansi.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  atom-one-dark.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ayu-light.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ayu.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  color-utils.ts   |   99.23 |    97.05 |     100 |   99.23 | 277-278           
  default-light.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  default.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...inal-theme.ts |   88.59 |    85.96 |     100 |   88.59 | ...57-261,266-270 
  dracula.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  github-dark.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  github-light.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  googlecode.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  no-color.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  qwen-dark.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  qwen-light.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tic-tokens.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-of-purple.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  theme-manager.ts |   88.68 |    84.52 |     100 |   88.68 | ...83-392,397-398 
  theme.ts         |     100 |    38.02 |     100 |     100 | ...34-449,457-461 
  xcode.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ui/utils      |    86.6 |       85 |    95.3 |    86.6 |                   
  ...Colorizer.tsx |   80.31 |    85.41 |     100 |   80.31 | ...00-201,313-339 
  ...nRenderer.tsx |   79.84 |     75.6 |     100 |   79.84 | ...66,270,328-329 
  ...wnDisplay.tsx |   92.87 |    93.46 |     100 |   92.87 | ...,955,1002-1020 
  ...idDiagram.tsx |   87.79 |    95.34 |     100 |   87.79 | 156-179           
  ...eRenderer.tsx |   92.38 |    81.91 |   95.23 |   92.38 | ...43-746,799-804 
  ...odeDisplay.ts |   94.28 |    85.71 |     100 |   94.28 | 23,40             
  asciiCharts.ts   |    96.7 |     87.5 |     100 |    96.7 | 170-177,278       
  ...dWorkUtils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...boardUtils.ts |   52.52 |    73.25 |   91.66 |   52.52 | ...23,626-635,638 
  commandUtils.ts  |   96.17 |    88.88 |     100 |   96.17 | ...77,179-180,323 
  computeStats.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  customBanner.ts  |   90.68 |    91.22 |     100 |   90.68 | ...13,324-327,334 
  displayUtils.ts  |   73.84 |    73.91 |     100 |   73.84 | ...34,36-40,42-46 
  formatters.ts    |    95.4 |    98.38 |     100 |    95.4 | 123-126           
  gradientUtils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  highlight.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...gap-notice.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...oryMapping.ts |     100 |       95 |     100 |     100 | 44,103            
  historyUtils.ts  |      96 |    97.05 |     100 |      96 | 102-105           
  inline-math.ts   |   98.48 |    95.23 |     100 |   98.48 | 129-130           
  input-mouse.ts   |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 48,93             
  isNarrowWidth.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...olDetector.ts |   69.47 |       75 |   66.66 |   69.47 | ...24-129,157-158 
  latexRenderer.ts |   94.95 |     73.8 |     100 |   94.95 | ...76-178,184-187 
  layoutUtils.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  list-mouse.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ightLoader.ts |     100 |       95 |     100 |     100 | 81                
  ...nUtilities.ts |   98.72 |    94.36 |     100 |   98.72 | 145-146           
  ...t-position.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 85                
  ...geRenderer.ts |   86.23 |    69.06 |   95.12 |   86.23 | ...1284,1324-1330 
  ...alRenderer.ts |   86.69 |     71.9 |     100 |   86.69 | ...1476,1513-1519 
  ...lsBySource.ts |     100 |    95.23 |     100 |     100 | 84                
  mouse.ts         |   92.85 |    74.19 |     100 |   92.85 | ...38,145,149-152 
  osc8.ts          |   90.43 |    78.33 |     100 |   90.43 | ...59,244,248-249 
  ...red-height.ts |   98.38 |     97.1 |     100 |   98.38 | 195-197           
  ...mConstants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  restoreGoal.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...storyUtils.ts |   79.32 |    77.37 |     100 |   79.32 | ...32-554,685-686 
  ...ickerUtils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...evel-label.ts |   77.77 |    66.66 |     100 |   77.77 | 18,22-24          
  ...are-cursor.ts |   89.47 |    85.71 |     100 |   89.47 | 39-44             
  ...ataService.ts |   93.17 |     79.1 |     100 |   93.17 | ...14,227,254-256 
  suggestions.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...izedOutput.ts |   94.94 |      100 |   88.88 |   94.94 | 112-117           
  ...nal-buffer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...wOptimizer.ts |     100 |    96.77 |     100 |     100 | 69                
  terminalSetup.ts |    4.37 |      100 |       0 |    4.37 | 44-393            
  textUtils.ts     |   95.97 |    94.06 |   94.44 |   95.97 | ...29-330,490-491 
  ...background.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  todoSnapshot.ts  |   90.42 |    92.85 |     100 |   90.42 | ...06-207,240-241 
  ...isplay-map.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  updateCheck.ts   |     100 |    92.75 |     100 |     100 | 227-239,331       
  ...ow-keyword.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...i/utils/export |   75.03 |    59.89 |   94.59 |   75.03 |                   
  collect.ts       |   71.27 |    65.81 |      96 |   71.27 | ...90-633,655-656 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  normalize.ts     |   80.42 |    50.68 |     100 |   80.42 | ...59-364,376-378 
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  utils.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ort/formatters |   52.92 |    47.22 |   71.42 |   52.92 |                   
  html.ts          |   84.61 |       50 |     100 |   84.61 | ...53,57-58,62-63 
  json.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  jsonl.ts         |   82.45 |     37.5 |     100 |   82.45 | ...48,50-51,65-66 
  markdown.ts      |   36.32 |    47.05 |      50 |   36.32 | ...16-219,233-295 
 src/ui/voice      |   80.94 |    72.69 |   80.55 |   80.94 |                   
  ...d-recorder.ts |     6.2 |      100 |       0 |     6.2 | ...33-159,162-163 
  ...o-recorder.ts |   84.61 |    93.33 |   57.14 |   84.61 | ...16-117,131-136 
  ...me-session.ts |   89.72 |    65.33 |   93.75 |   89.72 | ...99,305,316-319 
  sox-recorder.ts  |    92.7 |    71.87 |     100 |    92.7 | ...34-135,153-154 
  ...ailability.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-keyterms.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  voice-model.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-recorder.ts |   88.29 |    67.74 |   81.81 |   88.29 | ...,98-99,112,115 
  voice-refine.ts  |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 92                
  ...ream-retry.ts |   86.79 |    68.42 |     100 |   86.79 | 16-18,48-49,59-60 
  ...am-session.ts |   88.02 |    66.66 |   84.61 |   88.02 | ...26,343-345,363 
  ...ranscriber.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/utils         |   81.37 |    87.05 |   92.49 |   81.37 |                   
  ...p-profiler.ts |   98.39 |    90.56 |     100 |   98.39 | 141,185,235       
  acpModelUtils.ts |   97.36 |    95.19 |     100 |   97.36 | ...09-210,214-215 
  apiPreconnect.ts |   96.74 |    94.59 |     100 |   96.74 | 167-170           
  ...ol-call-id.ts |   84.61 |       60 |     100 |   84.61 | 26-27,37-38       
  ...ng-failure.ts |     100 |       95 |     100 |     100 | 72                
  checks.ts        |   33.33 |      100 |       0 |   33.33 | 23-28             
  ...-api-error.ts |     100 |    96.42 |     100 |     100 | 14                
  cleanup.ts       |   84.05 |    94.11 |      80 |   84.05 | 80,111-121        
  commands.ts      |   97.45 |    96.66 |     100 |   97.45 | 153-155           
  ...Calculator.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cpuProfiler.ts   |   70.73 |    73.23 |   88.88 |   70.73 | ...27,430-431,438 
  deepMerge.ts     |     100 |       90 |     100 |     100 | 41-43,49          
  ...re-runtime.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ScopeUtils.ts |   97.56 |    88.88 |     100 |   97.56 | 67                
  doctorChecks.ts  |   70.31 |    74.57 |     100 |   70.31 | ...95-301,325-341 
  ...putCapture.ts |   90.65 |    86.17 |     100 |   90.65 | ...72,370,372-373 
  ...arResolver.ts |   97.14 |    96.55 |     100 |   97.14 | 125-126           
  errors.ts        |   97.56 |    94.64 |     100 |   97.56 | 69-70,304-305     
  events.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-mention.ts |   88.48 |     82.6 |     100 |   88.48 | ...56-160,164-168 
  gitUtils.ts      |   92.85 |    86.66 |     100 |   92.85 | ...13-116,164-167 
  ...AutoUpdate.ts |    93.1 |       94 |      90 |    93.1 | 103,108,179-190   
  ...tyWarnings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...lationInfo.ts |   97.68 |    94.28 |     100 |   97.68 | ...59,376-377,422 
  jsonc-editor.ts  |   93.18 |    92.72 |     100 |   93.18 | ...80-381,384-385 
  languageUtils.ts |   98.88 |    97.05 |     100 |   98.88 | 184-185           
  load-undici.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...npm-update.ts |   89.05 |    76.38 |     100 |   89.05 | ...86,302-303,340 
  math.ts          |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-15              
  ...er-mention.ts |     100 |    66.66 |     100 |     100 | 14,30,44-46       
  ...iagnostics.ts |   94.57 |    83.01 |   88.88 |   94.57 | ...05,311,315-317 
  ...serMessage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...onfigUtils.ts |   94.25 |    91.17 |     100 |   94.25 | ...30,436,439-443 
  ...iveHelpers.ts |   95.13 |    91.79 |     100 |   95.13 | ...53-454,552,565 
  osc.ts           |   97.18 |      100 |    87.5 |   97.18 | 182-183           
  package.ts       |   88.88 |    85.71 |     100 |   88.88 | 31-32             
  ...uggestions.ts |   74.38 |    69.56 |     100 |   74.38 | ...92-103,105-116 
  processUtils.ts  |    92.3 |       80 |     100 |    92.3 | 45-46             
  readStdin.ts     |   93.67 |    94.11 |   85.71 |   93.67 | 79-83             
  relaunch.ts      |   95.87 |    89.28 |     100 |   95.87 | 103-105,131       
  resolvePath.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  runBudget.ts     |   99.35 |    96.77 |     100 |   99.35 | 119               
  sandbox-path.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sandbox.ts       |   45.67 |    56.93 |   76.92 |   45.67 | ...1034,1046-1069 
  ...xImageName.ts |     100 |    77.77 |     100 |     100 | 10,18             
  sandboxMounts.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sessionPaths.ts  |   90.84 |    90.56 |     100 |   90.84 | ...81-182,185-186 
  settingsUtils.ts |   82.35 |    89.57 |      90 |   82.35 | ...25-743,750-758 
  spawnWrapper.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ate-verify.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...one-update.ts |   39.81 |    77.44 |   62.16 |   39.81 | ...1193,1196-1215 
  ...upProfiler.ts |   98.47 |    94.66 |     100 |   98.47 | 132-133,308       
  ...upWarnings.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  stdioHelpers.ts  |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 23                
  systemInfo.ts    |   95.12 |    90.27 |     100 |   95.12 | ...54-255,260-264 
  ...InfoFields.ts |    87.5 |    65.85 |     100 |    87.5 | ...24-125,146-147 
  ...alSequence.ts |     100 |    97.61 |     100 |     100 | 60                
  ...iffPreview.ts |   76.47 |       25 |     100 |   76.47 | 13,17,23-24       
  ...e-relaunch.ts |   89.61 |    86.66 |      50 |   89.61 | 56-61,83-84       
  ...entEmitter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ansionHook.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...upWarnings.ts |   87.75 |       75 |     100 |   87.75 | 47-48,53-54,57-58 
  version.ts       |     100 |    66.66 |     100 |     100 | 11                
  ...ingHandler.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  windowTitle.ts   |   95.45 |    93.33 |     100 |   95.45 | 54-55             
  ...WithBackup.ts |   65.04 |    77.77 |     100 |   65.04 | 97,112,133-172    
 ...s/housekeeping |   91.63 |    91.02 |      95 |   91.63 |                   
  cleanup.ts       |   95.77 |    95.83 |     100 |   95.77 | 70-72             
  ...eractionAt.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  scheduler.ts     |   91.91 |    90.47 |    87.5 |   91.91 | 58-62,73,131-135  
  throttledOnce.ts |   86.66 |     86.2 |     100 |   86.66 | ...99,105,137-138 
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------

Core Package - Full Text Report

-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
File               | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | Uncovered Line #s 
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
All files          |   87.42 |    86.08 |   89.05 |   87.42 |                   
 src               |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/__mocks__/fs  |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  promises.ts      |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-48              
 src/agents        |   90.24 |    84.12 |   95.16 |   90.24 |                   
  ...transcript.ts |   87.63 |    83.52 |     100 |   87.63 | ...79,587,593-597 
  ...ent-resume.ts |   85.52 |    77.55 |   83.33 |   85.52 | ...1779-1783,1786 
  ...ound-tasks.ts |   96.15 |     90.1 |   98.76 |   96.15 | ...1732,1752-1755 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ent-result.ts |    96.8 |    92.68 |     100 |    96.8 | 106,129-131       
  ...n-registry.ts |   95.65 |    89.41 |     100 |   95.65 | ...12-413,485-489 
  ...w-snapshot.ts |   91.86 |       75 |     100 |   91.86 | ...54,178,185-187 
 src/agents/arena  |   76.32 |    67.71 |   78.94 |   76.32 |                   
  ...gentClient.ts |   79.47 |    88.88 |   81.81 |   79.47 | ...68-183,189-204 
  ArenaManager.ts  |   75.11 |    64.51 |   78.57 |   75.11 | ...1887,1893-1894 
  arena-events.ts  |   64.44 |      100 |      50 |   64.44 | ...71-175,178-183 
  diff-summary.ts  |    87.5 |    72.34 |     100 |    87.5 | ...32-133,137-138 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...gents/backends |   78.09 |    85.23 |   76.28 |   78.09 |                   
  ITermBackend.ts  |   97.97 |    93.93 |     100 |   97.97 | ...78-180,255,307 
  ...essBackend.ts |    90.9 |    85.36 |   93.33 |    90.9 | ...70,672,674-675 
  TmuxBackend.ts   |    90.7 |    76.55 |   97.36 |    90.7 | ...87,697,743-747 
  detect.ts        |   31.25 |      100 |       0 |   31.25 | 34-88             
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  iterm-it2.ts     |     100 |     92.1 |     100 |     100 | 37-38,106         
  tmux-commands.ts |    6.64 |      100 |    3.03 |    6.64 | ...93-363,386-503 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...agents/runtime |   90.37 |    85.82 |   87.44 |   90.37 |                   
  agent-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  agent-core.ts    |   85.05 |    76.73 |   77.77 |   85.05 | ...2287,2333-2335 
  agent-events.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t-headless.ts |   93.49 |    89.41 |   83.33 |   93.49 | ...96-497,500-501 
  ...nteractive.ts |   81.01 |    82.35 |   76.66 |   81.01 | ...33,535-538,541 
  ...statistics.ts |   98.29 |    82.55 |     100 |   98.29 | 141,165,206,239   
  agent-types.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ool-policy.ts |   98.34 |      100 |    92.3 |   98.34 | 81-82             
  ...low-budget.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ow-journal.ts |   91.76 |    75.86 |     100 |   91.76 | ...38-139,179-181 
  ...chestrator.ts |   91.79 |    87.79 |   82.35 |   91.79 | ...1774,1823-1826 
  ...ow-prompts.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ow-sandbox.ts |   96.87 |    94.51 |     100 |   96.87 | ...24-325,330-331 
  ...flow-saved.ts |   96.51 |    94.36 |     100 |   96.51 | 134-135,234-237   
  ...flow-stall.ts |    97.9 |    83.33 |     100 |    97.9 | 138-139,236       
 src/agents/tasks  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/agents/team   |   81.81 |    83.99 |    87.5 |   81.81 |                   
  TeamManager.ts   |   72.02 |    79.41 |   79.24 |   72.02 | ...1632,1655-1656 
  identity.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sionBridge.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mailbox.ts       |   94.76 |    86.36 |   92.85 |   94.76 | 86-87,348-354     
  ...ptAddendum.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tasks.ts         |   88.85 |    82.56 |   96.29 |   88.85 | ...-990,1034-1035 
  team-events.ts   |   60.52 |      100 |      50 |   60.52 | ...40-144,151-155 
  teamHelpers.ts   |   92.02 |    94.91 |   95.23 |   92.02 | ...31-332,368-378 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...eam/test-utils |   94.39 |    94.26 |   98.21 |   94.39 |                   
  ...on-harness.ts |   96.49 |    84.21 |     100 |   96.49 | 128-129,141-142   
  fake-agent.ts    |   98.49 |    95.08 |     100 |   98.49 | 201-203           
  fake-backend.ts  |   86.46 |    97.61 |   95.83 |   86.46 | 124-146           
 src/config        |    84.6 |    86.81 |      75 |    84.6 |                   
  approval-mode.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...xtDefaults.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |   83.86 |     86.5 |   73.31 |   83.86 | ...8086,8090-8091 
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  models.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  storage.ts       |   94.39 |    91.57 |   88.23 |   94.39 | ...45-446,449-450 
 ...nfirmation-bus |   98.27 |    97.14 |     100 |   98.27 |                   
  message-bus.ts   |   98.14 |    97.05 |     100 |   98.14 | 42-43             
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/core          |   91.79 |    87.98 |   93.08 |   91.79 |                   
  baseLlmClient.ts |   88.28 |    82.48 |   81.81 |   88.28 | ...47,660,666-668 
  client.ts        |   91.92 |    87.39 |   91.56 |   91.92 | ...3915,4011-4012 
  ...tGenerator.ts |   86.34 |    87.34 |   84.61 |   86.34 | ...65-466,511-517 
  ...lScheduler.ts |   90.01 |    85.74 |      96 |   90.01 | ...5604,5632-5643 
  geminiChat.ts    |   92.42 |    89.27 |      96 |   92.42 | ...4429,4477-4478 
  geminiRequest.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  genai-compat.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...MediaLimit.ts |     100 |       96 |     100 |     100 | 96                
  ...htProtocol.ts |    9.09 |      100 |       0 |    9.09 | ...9,62-66,69-110 
  ...ream-error.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  logger.ts        |   87.41 |    87.02 |     100 |   87.41 | ...64-568,614-628 
  ...lay-buffer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...dispatcher.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tyDefaults.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...olExecutor.ts |   93.54 |    83.33 |      50 |   93.54 | 47-48             
  ...on-helpers.ts |   93.49 |    78.57 |     100 |   93.49 | ...10-211,228-229 
  ...issionFlow.ts |   98.97 |    96.96 |     100 |   98.97 | 107               
  ...try-policy.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ell-policy.ts |   95.19 |    89.47 |     100 |   95.19 | ...44-245,290-291 
  prompts.ts       |   93.57 |    91.42 |   83.33 |   93.57 | ...1187,1390-1391 
  ...ing-effort.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...n-recovery.ts |   95.13 |       80 |     100 |   95.13 | ...06-107,142-144 
  ...t-profiler.ts |   96.89 |    80.88 |   88.23 |   96.89 | ...10,117-118,123 
  ...port-retry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tokenLimits.ts   |     100 |     92.1 |     100 |     100 | 87,122-139        
  ...reparation.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...allIdUtils.ts |   98.41 |    93.47 |     100 |   98.41 | 36,45             
  ...okTriggers.ts |   99.45 |    92.43 |     100 |   99.45 | 182,193           
  ...terruption.ts |     100 |     92.3 |     100 |     100 | 86,104            
  turn.ts          |   98.52 |    91.66 |     100 |   98.52 | ...14,642-643,690 
 ...ntentGenerator |   96.24 |    87.19 |   95.38 |   96.24 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   97.09 |    86.94 |   94.44 |   97.09 | ...1329,1358,1369 
  converter.ts     |   96.16 |    87.32 |     100 |   96.16 | ...,984,1139-1141 
  index.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-21              
  usage.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ntentGenerator |   88.78 |    72.36 |   89.47 |   88.78 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   87.18 |    71.83 |   88.88 |   87.18 | ...58-364,382-383 
  index.ts         |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 50                
 ...ntentGenerator |   95.21 |    86.46 |    92.3 |   95.21 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   95.12 |     85.4 |   91.89 |   95.12 | ...1169-1170,1198 
  ...tDetection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...ntentGenerator |   91.65 |    90.23 |   95.23 |   91.65 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  converter.ts     |   91.15 |    89.32 |   96.87 |   91.15 | ...1914,2083-2098 
  errorHandler.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |   60.31 |       75 |      50 |   60.31 | ...71,74-78,90-94 
  ...tGenerator.ts |    66.4 |    70.58 |   88.88 |    66.4 | ...51-157,168-169 
  pipeline.ts      |   96.63 |    90.94 |     100 |   96.63 | ...1100,1108,1203 
  ...ureContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ingOptions.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  ...CallParser.ts |   92.24 |     92.4 |     100 |   92.24 | ...28-529,549-552 
  ...kingParser.ts |     100 |    96.87 |     100 |     100 | 42                
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...rator/provider |   96.73 |    89.76 |   98.27 |   96.73 |                   
  dashscope.ts     |   97.48 |    91.91 |      95 |   97.48 | ...85-386,528-529 
  deepseek.ts      |   94.91 |    89.36 |     100 |   94.91 | ...31-132,145-146 
  default.ts       |   99.16 |    96.96 |     100 |   99.16 | 198               
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mimo.ts          |   94.11 |    66.66 |     100 |   94.11 | 29,52-53          
  minimax.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mistral.ts       |   96.07 |    73.33 |     100 |   96.07 | 32-33             
  modelscope.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  utils.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zai.ts           |   92.13 |    82.14 |     100 |   92.13 | ...,39-40,135-137 
 src/extension     |    86.2 |    83.21 |   92.33 |    86.2 |                   
  ...ive-safety.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-converter.ts |   78.32 |    71.83 |     100 |   78.32 | ...1122,1168-1169 
  corruptFile.ts   |     100 |       50 |     100 |     100 | 40-45             
  ...-converter.ts |   80.39 |     87.5 |     100 |   80.39 | 50-59             
  ...me-refresh.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sion-store.ts |   90.82 |    86.14 |   97.82 |   90.82 | ...1215-1221,1265 
  ...ionManager.ts |   81.06 |    78.78 |   81.52 |   81.06 | ...2705,2727-2728 
  ...references.ts |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | ...05,129,197,200 
  ...onSettings.ts |    92.3 |     94.4 |     100 |    92.3 | ...98-501,570-571 
  ...-converter.ts |    75.9 |    84.61 |   85.71 |    75.9 | ...98,202,214-248 
  github.ts        |   88.58 |    82.13 |     100 |   88.58 | ...62,952-953,963 
  http-client.ts   |   84.61 |       80 |     100 |   84.61 | 20-21             
  i18n.ts          |   78.26 |       96 |      50 |   78.26 | 104-110,116-123   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  marketplace.ts   |   88.39 |    83.11 |     100 |   88.39 | ...08,494,507-508 
  ...ork-policy.ts |   89.72 |       90 |     100 |   89.72 | ...36,148-154,156 
  npm.ts           |   89.02 |    81.81 |     100 |   89.02 | ...86-688,695-700 
  override.ts      |   94.11 |    93.33 |     100 |   94.11 | 63-64,81-82       
  redaction.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  settings.ts      |   66.26 |      100 |      50 |   66.26 | 81-107,141-146    
  ...ceRegistry.ts |   94.01 |    83.14 |     100 |   94.01 | ...38-344,365-366 
  storage.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ableSchema.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  variables.ts     |   88.95 |    83.78 |     100 |   88.95 | ...32-235,238-241 
  ...extraction.ts |   85.77 |    80.61 |   89.47 |   85.77 | ...02-205,260-261 
 src/followup      |   77.48 |    79.84 |    90.9 |   77.48 |                   
  followupState.ts |   98.44 |    95.74 |     100 |   98.44 | 236-237           
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  overlayFs.ts     |   96.29 |    88.88 |     100 |   96.29 | 78,108,122        
  speculation.ts   |   65.58 |    62.63 |   71.42 |   65.58 | ...21-622,629-630 
  ...onToolGate.ts |     100 |    96.55 |     100 |     100 | 97                
  ...nGenerator.ts |   72.03 |    81.15 |   83.33 |   72.03 | ...68-219,331-333 
 src/generated     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  git-commit.ts    |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-10              
 src/goals         |   94.17 |    88.82 |   95.93 |   94.17 |                   
  ...eGoalStore.ts |   87.61 |    88.88 |   86.66 |   87.61 | ...85-188,196-204 
  goal-evidence.ts |   87.59 |     85.1 |   95.65 |   87.59 | ...12-613,636-639 
  ...projection.ts |   89.41 |    72.22 |   66.66 |   89.41 | ...28,131,135-137 
  ...ersistence.ts |   87.73 |    84.84 |      80 |   87.73 | ...-94,97,101-106 
  goal-protocol.ts |    91.3 |       90 |     100 |    91.3 | 107-108           
  goal-reducer.ts  |   92.21 |    85.48 |     100 |   92.21 | ...67-368,381,436 
  goal-runtime.ts  |   99.01 |    93.44 |     100 |   99.01 | ...83-684,707-708 
  goal-tools.ts    |   98.32 |    93.18 |   95.23 |   98.32 | ...48-149,256-257 
  ...rn-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  goal-verifier.ts |   92.46 |    92.85 |     100 |   92.46 | ...67-170,183-185 
  goal-wire.ts     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-27              
  goalHook.ts      |   96.91 |    92.42 |     100 |   96.91 | 115-120,221-222   
  goalJudge.ts     |   95.84 |    87.09 |     100 |   95.84 | ...55-356,448-449 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/hooks         |   88.05 |    86.37 |   88.54 |   88.05 |                   
  ...okRegistry.ts |   86.48 |    77.08 |     100 |   86.48 | ...41-344,362-369 
  ...bortSignal.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  context-usage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...terpolator.ts |   96.66 |    93.33 |     100 |   96.66 | 66-67             
  ...HookRunner.ts |   96.68 |    87.23 |     100 |   96.68 | 110-112,231-233   
  ...Aggregator.ts |   96.57 |    91.48 |     100 |   96.57 | ...20-321,402,404 
  ...entHandler.ts |   95.46 |       84 |   94.59 |   95.46 | ...1015-1016,1026 
  hookPlanner.ts   |    87.5 |    85.36 |   86.66 |    87.5 | ...21-225,232-243 
  hookRegistry.ts  |   92.53 |    85.43 |     100 |   92.53 | ...39,458,462,466 
  hookRunner.ts    |   62.65 |    72.34 |   66.66 |   62.65 | ...70-771,780-781 
  hookSystem.ts    |   87.55 |      100 |   70.21 |   87.55 | ...45-746,752-753 
  ...HookRunner.ts |   79.06 |    66.66 |      80 |   79.06 | ...33-434,452-456 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...edCallback.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...HookRunner.ts |   94.19 |    84.37 |   81.81 |   94.19 | ...76-384,458-459 
  ...SkillHooks.ts |   78.75 |       75 |   66.66 |   78.75 | 62-66,137-152     
  ...oksManager.ts |   94.87 |    88.88 |     100 |   94.87 | ...84,325,327-329 
  ssrfGuard.ts     |   86.45 |    89.13 |     100 |   86.45 | ...85,289-295,301 
  stopHookCap.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  trustedHooks.ts  |      90 |    52.63 |     100 |      90 | ...53,66-67,97-98 
  types.ts         |   94.24 |    96.12 |   88.88 |   94.24 | ...42-543,628-632 
  urlValidator.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...it-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/ide           |   76.98 |    85.03 |   79.03 |   76.98 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  detect-ide.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ide-client.ts    |   69.16 |    84.65 |   68.29 |   69.16 | ...1068,1097-1105 
  ide-installer.ts |   89.06 |    79.31 |     100 |   89.06 | ...36,143-147,160 
  ideContext.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  process-utils.ts |   84.84 |    71.79 |     100 |   84.84 | ...37,151,193-194 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/lsp           |   58.96 |    70.57 |   66.14 |   58.96 |                   
  ...nfigLoader.ts |   80.55 |       72 |   95.45 |   80.55 | ...02-504,508-514 
  ...ionFactory.ts |   42.81 |    73.07 |      50 |   42.81 | ...76-427,433-450 
  ...Normalizer.ts |   23.09 |    13.72 |   30.43 |   23.09 | ...04-905,909-924 
  ...verManager.ts |   75.73 |     80.1 |   79.66 |   75.73 | ...1346,1352-1382 
  ...eLspClient.ts |   32.78 |       80 |   16.66 |   32.78 | ...89-293,299-300 
  ...LspService.ts |      60 |    73.36 |   78.26 |      60 | ...1575,1635-1645 
  configHash.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/mcp           |    82.3 |    77.81 |   78.33 |    82.3 |                   
  configHash.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...h-provider.ts |   86.95 |      100 |   33.33 |   86.95 | ...,93,97,101-102 
  ...h-provider.ts |   79.31 |    58.06 |     100 |   79.31 | ...26-933,940-942 
  ...en-storage.ts |   98.78 |    97.95 |     100 |   98.78 | 106-107           
  oauth-utils.ts   |   73.61 |    85.48 |    92.3 |   73.61 | ...46-366,392-421 
  ...n-provider.ts |   89.83 |       96 |   45.45 |   89.83 | ...43,147,151-152 
 .../token-storage |   82.12 |    88.19 |   89.28 |   82.12 |                   
  ...en-storage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...en-storage.ts |   87.08 |    87.03 |   95.23 |   87.08 | ...00-201,214-215 
  ...en-storage.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...en-storage.ts |   68.14 |    82.35 |   64.28 |   68.14 | ...81-295,298-314 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/memory        |   87.17 |    82.69 |   90.29 |   87.17 |                   
  ...y-document.ts |   89.52 |    84.61 |     100 |   89.52 | ...24-325,329-330 
  ...nel-memory.ts |   97.11 |    95.72 |   96.29 |   97.11 | ...85-287,361-362 
  const.ts         |   94.28 |     92.3 |     100 |   94.28 | 66-67             
  dream.ts         |    64.6 |    72.22 |      50 |    64.6 | ...04-109,124-165 
  ...entPlanner.ts |     100 |    81.81 |     100 |     100 | 126,136           
  entries.ts       |   75.59 |    84.84 |   83.33 |   75.59 | ...56-157,172-180 
  extract.ts       |   91.48 |    75.75 |     100 |   91.48 | ...99,118-121,189 
  ...entPlanner.ts |   91.51 |    76.19 |     100 |   91.51 | ...04,113-116,290 
  ...ionPlanner.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  forget.ts        |   81.83 |       75 |   83.33 |   81.83 | ...51,474,478-507 
  indexer.ts       |   94.14 |       84 |     100 |   94.14 | ...32-233,334,337 
  ...kill-agent.ts |   97.94 |    89.36 |     100 |   97.94 | 82-83,179-180     
  manager.ts       |    78.4 |    82.29 |   77.77 |    78.4 | ...1482,1495-1497 
  ...ent-config.ts |   82.27 |    77.92 |   83.33 |   82.27 | ...66,285,292-298 
  memoryAge.ts     |   90.47 |       80 |     100 |   90.47 | 50-51             
  paths.ts         |   94.73 |    95.94 |     100 |   94.73 | ...35-336,357-358 
  ...ing-skills.ts |     100 |       72 |     100 |     100 | 31-35,73-78,97    
  prompt.ts        |   97.26 |    87.03 |     100 |   97.26 | ...10-218,222,225 
  recall.ts        |   82.06 |       75 |    90.9 |   82.06 | ...59-364,395-406 
  refresh.ts       |   89.85 |    82.92 |     100 |   89.85 | ...54-155,162-163 
  ...ceSelector.ts |    93.1 |    81.81 |     100 |    93.1 | ...25,127-128,136 
  remember.ts      |   98.89 |    89.79 |     100 |   98.89 | 50,70             
  scan.ts          |   93.12 |    74.19 |     100 |   93.12 | ...08-109,154,157 
  ...et-scanner.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...entPlanner.ts |   71.68 |    65.51 |   68.75 |   71.68 | ...90-394,397,403 
  status.ts        |   10.52 |      100 |       0 |   10.52 | 41-98             
  store.ts         |   92.92 |    81.81 |     100 |   92.92 | ...16-117,147-148 
  ...git-status.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 30                
  ...cret-guard.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...emory-sync.ts |   94.24 |    82.85 |     100 |   94.24 | ...34-236,246-247 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ontextFile.ts |   81.21 |     79.1 |   81.81 |   81.21 | ...63-277,291-296 
 src/mocks         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  msw.ts           |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-9               
 src/models        |   92.54 |    88.64 |   91.13 |   92.54 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tor-config.ts |   97.77 |    91.83 |     100 |   97.77 | 155,161,171       
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nfigErrors.ts |   74.22 |       44 |   84.61 |   74.22 | ...,67-74,106-117 
  ...igResolver.ts |   98.71 |    93.33 |     100 |   98.71 | 166,328,334       
  modelRegistry.ts |     100 |    98.13 |     100 |     100 | 177,260           
  modelsConfig.ts  |   89.36 |    86.93 |   88.09 |   89.36 | ...1404,1433-1434 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/output        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-formatter.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/permissions   |   83.58 |    91.03 |   70.71 |   83.58 |                   
  autoMode.ts      |   97.65 |    93.13 |     100 |   97.65 | ...79-586,632,709 
  ...transcript.ts |      98 |    84.61 |     100 |      98 | 200-201           
  classifier.ts    |      94 |    94.54 |     100 |      94 | 158-165,389-393   
  ...erousRules.ts |     100 |    89.36 |     100 |     100 | 110,133,147,175   
  ...alTracking.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-commands.ts |   86.77 |     73.8 |     100 |   86.77 | 131-141,210-214   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-manager.ts |   86.54 |    89.63 |      80 |   86.54 | ...1096,1202-1206 
  rule-parser.ts   |   94.18 |    91.89 |     100 |   94.18 | ...1345,1379-1381 
  ...-semantics.ts |   70.36 |    91.04 |   46.66 |   70.36 | ...2237,2300-2303 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...sifier-prompts |   99.04 |    95.23 |     100 |   99.04 |                   
  system-prompt.ts |   99.04 |    95.23 |     100 |   99.04 | 220               
 src/prompts       |   83.63 |      100 |    87.5 |   83.63 |                   
  mcp-prompts.ts   |   18.18 |      100 |       0 |   18.18 | 11-19             
  ...t-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/providers     |   83.71 |     78.5 |   81.25 |   83.71 |                   
  all-providers.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  install.ts       |   93.11 |     84.5 |     100 |   93.11 | ...56-257,330-331 
  ...der-config.ts |   75.85 |    73.84 |   78.26 |   75.85 | ...73-474,502-503 
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
 ...viders/presets |   97.82 |    91.66 |   63.63 |   97.82 |                   
  ...oding-plan.ts |   87.34 |      100 |       0 |   87.34 | 82-84,87-89,91-94 
  ...a-standard.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...token-plan.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...m-provider.ts |   97.05 |    81.25 |      75 |   97.05 | 118-119           
  deepseek.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  grok.ts          |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  idealab.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  minimax.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  modelscope.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  openrouter.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  requesty.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  zai.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/qwen          |   85.41 |    78.76 |   95.89 |   85.41 |                   
  ...tGenerator.ts |   98.64 |    98.18 |     100 |   98.64 | 105-106           
  qwenOAuth2.ts    |   82.79 |    73.75 |   90.62 |   82.79 | ...1205-1221,1251 
  ...kenManager.ts |   85.36 |    76.61 |     100 |   85.36 | ...52-757,778-783 
 src/resources     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-registry.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/services      |   89.39 |     84.5 |   96.78 |   89.39 |                   
  ...ionTrailer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...llRegistry.ts |   97.68 |    85.71 |     100 |   97.68 | ...96,119,490-491 
  ...ionService.ts |   96.71 |    95.79 |     100 |   96.71 | ...83,699,832-840 
  ...ingService.ts |   90.91 |    84.17 |   95.45 |   90.91 | ...2058,2085-2086 
  ...ttribution.ts |   91.73 |    87.71 |      90 |   91.73 | ...80-685,826-827 
  ...utSlimming.ts |    97.2 |    94.05 |     100 |    97.2 | ...39-340,378-381 
  cronScheduler.ts |   94.17 |    90.45 |      98 |   94.17 | ...1333,1736-1737 
  cronTasksFile.ts |   96.31 |    91.81 |     100 |   96.31 | ...11,336-337,483 
  cronTasksLock.ts |   94.44 |    89.47 |     100 |   94.44 | ...02-103,132-133 
  ...eryService.ts |   96.22 |    93.54 |      90 |   96.22 | 121,155-156,161   
  ...oryService.ts |   88.17 |    79.02 |    92.3 |   88.17 | ...1303,1344-1347 
  fileReadCache.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...temService.ts |   91.78 |    81.81 |   94.11 |   91.78 | ...37,463-470,517 
  ...ratedFiles.ts |      96 |    88.23 |     100 |      96 | 119-120,146-147   
  gitInit.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...reeService.ts |    73.7 |    68.49 |   95.83 |    73.7 | ...2196,2225-2226 
  ...on-service.ts |   87.38 |       72 |     100 |   87.38 | ...01-305,343-344 
  ...references.ts |   98.39 |    88.76 |     100 |   98.39 | 154-155,215-216   
  ...ionService.ts |   98.22 |    97.34 |     100 |   98.22 | ...75-676,723-724 
  ...ticsDumper.ts |   98.37 |    95.23 |     100 |   98.37 | 185-186           
  ...ureMonitor.ts |   95.82 |    90.52 |   97.05 |   95.82 | ...60,861,875-877 
  ...orRegistry.ts |    97.3 |    91.22 |     100 |    97.3 | ...53-454,611-612 
  ...ttachments.ts |   97.74 |     90.8 |     100 |   97.74 | 298-308,646       
  ...ersistence.ts |   90.95 |    78.75 |     100 |   90.95 | ...78,963-964,992 
  ...on-service.ts |   94.49 |    92.26 |   97.14 |   94.49 | ...98-600,656-664 
  ...ce-service.ts |   98.38 |    93.75 |   88.88 |   98.38 | 63-64             
  ...ipt-reader.ts |   94.51 |    89.14 |      98 |   94.51 | ...1102-1103,1167 
  ...est-helper.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-65              
  ...iter-lease.ts |   79.58 |    74.13 |   95.58 |   79.58 | ...1913,1917-1929 
  sessionRecap.ts  |   67.56 |    43.47 |     100 |   67.56 | ...60,178,180-183 
  ...ionService.ts |   88.94 |    83.69 |   97.14 |   88.94 | ...2450,2520-2540 
  sessionTitle.ts  |   94.19 |    73.21 |     100 |   94.19 | ...43-246,277-278 
  ...ionService.ts |   84.35 |    78.37 |   97.14 |   84.35 | ...2472,2478-2483 
  ...pInhibitor.ts |   97.42 |    92.77 |     100 |   97.42 | ...30,169,369-370 
  ...Estimation.ts |     100 |    88.23 |     100 |     100 | 118-119           
  ...ageService.ts |   97.76 |    91.59 |   93.75 |   97.76 | ...61-262,366,567 
  ...UseSummary.ts |   94.63 |    88.46 |     100 |   94.63 | ...62-164,214-215 
  ...rd-service.ts |     100 |    88.37 |     100 |     100 | ...29,145-146,241 
  ...oryService.ts |   90.72 |    84.07 |     100 |   90.72 | ...06-509,561-562 
  ...reeCleanup.ts |   14.42 |      100 |   33.33 |   14.42 | 58-186            
  ...ionService.ts |   87.98 |    86.95 |     100 |   87.98 | ...38-439,455-456 
 ...icrocompaction |   99.41 |    96.55 |     100 |   99.41 |                   
  microcompact.ts  |   99.41 |    96.55 |     100 |   99.41 | 244-245,677       
 ...s/visionBridge |   98.81 |    92.12 |     100 |   98.81 |                   
  ...capability.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...part-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ion-bridge.ts |   98.72 |    82.35 |     100 |   98.72 | 65,71             
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ge-service.ts |   98.61 |     94.7 |     100 |   98.61 | ...06,666,679-680 
 src/skills        |   88.52 |     87.7 |   90.47 |   88.52 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...activation.ts |     100 |    93.33 |     100 |     100 | 93,112            
  skill-load.ts    |   94.84 |     87.5 |     100 |   94.84 | ...03,223,235-237 
  skill-manager.ts |   84.07 |    83.67 |   83.33 |   84.07 | ...1233,1240-1244 
  skill-paths.ts   |   89.65 |    86.95 |     100 |   89.65 | ...11-112,117-118 
  symlinkScope.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |   97.91 |       98 |     100 |   97.91 | 277-278           
 ...ataviz/scripts |   80.06 |    95.23 |   88.23 |   80.06 |                   
  ...te_palette.js |   80.06 |    95.23 |   88.23 |   80.06 | 261-296,306-328   
 ...s/bundled/loop |   97.48 |    95.77 |     100 |   97.48 |                   
  ...omous-loop.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-task-file.ts |   94.85 |     92.4 |     100 |   94.85 | ...56,367,375-376 
  ...k-resolver.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/subagents     |   87.63 |    88.64 |   96.55 |   87.63 |                   
  ...ter-schema.ts |     100 |    98.07 |     100 |     100 | 99                
  ...tin-agents.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nt-manager.ts |   84.25 |    85.31 |   94.87 |   84.25 | ...1566,1643-1644 
  types.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  validation.ts    |   92.46 |    95.18 |     100 |   92.46 | 47-52,63-68,71-76 
 src/telemetry     |   80.91 |    83.37 |   84.44 |   80.91 |                   
  ...ty-tracker.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  config.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  constants.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-metrics.ts |   99.07 |    80.95 |     100 |   99.07 | 183,197           
  ...on-tracing.ts |   76.31 |    74.62 |   73.68 |   76.31 | ...80,387-389,405 
  ...attributes.ts |   95.15 |    87.27 |     100 |   95.15 | ...97-198,216-217 
  ...ag-metrics.ts |     100 |    77.77 |     100 |     100 | 21,40             
  ...t-loop-lag.ts |     100 |    90.47 |     100 |     100 | 49,76             
  ...-exporters.ts |   65.78 |    83.33 |   55.55 |   65.78 | ...04-105,108-109 
  ...ai-content.ts |    74.5 |    66.41 |   91.66 |    74.5 | ...1480,1493-1502 
  ...i-provider.ts |     100 |       99 |     100 |     100 | 99                
  ...ai-request.ts |   87.52 |    92.79 |   83.78 |   87.52 | ...55-561,564-570 
  gen-ai-usage.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...t.circular.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-111             
  ...-processor.ts |   99.09 |    95.61 |      95 |   99.09 | 141,365-366       
  ...t.circular.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-128             
  loggers.ts       |    56.1 |    71.15 |   64.15 |    56.1 | ...1376,1393-1413 
  metrics.ts       |   78.44 |    79.62 |   79.66 |   78.44 | ...1079,1082-1093 
  otlp-urls.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...attributes.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ime-config.ts |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
  sanitize.ts      |      80 |    83.33 |     100 |      80 | 35-36,41-42       
  ...rters-grpc.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rters-http.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  sdk-impl.ts      |   91.06 |    87.15 |   68.75 |   91.06 | ...32,478-479,495 
  sdk.ts           |   79.22 |    89.18 |   63.63 |   79.22 | ...57-161,199-221 
  ...on-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-tracing.ts |   90.83 |    90.05 |   96.77 |   90.83 | ...1666,1697-1700 
  ...etry-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...l-decision.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  trace-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...e-id-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tracer.ts        |   98.56 |    88.63 |     100 |   98.56 | 52,101            
  types.ts         |   82.35 |    87.23 |   86.04 |   82.35 | ...1361,1365-1372 
  uiTelemetry.ts   |   97.18 |    93.93 |      88 |   97.18 | ...70,314,461-462 
 ...ry/qwen-logger |   74.11 |     80.7 |      70 |   74.11 |                   
  event-types.ts   |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  qwen-logger.ts   |   74.11 |    80.53 |   69.49 |   74.11 | ...1118,1156-1157 
 src/test-utils    |      94 |    98.24 |   78.94 |      94 |                   
  config.ts        |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...st-helpers.ts |   94.11 |       90 |     100 |   94.11 | 69-70             
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mock-tool.ts     |   92.57 |      100 |   75.75 |   92.57 | ...63,227-228,241 
  ...aceContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 src/tools         |   85.95 |    84.62 |   88.31 |   85.95 |                   
  ...erQuestion.ts |   89.71 |    80.76 |   91.66 |   89.71 | ...66-367,374-375 
  ...-registrar.ts |    77.7 |    66.66 |   66.66 |    77.7 | ...72-277,292-294 
  ...ub-session.ts |   89.67 |     91.3 |   81.81 |   89.67 | ...03-304,315-322 
  cron-create.ts   |   90.64 |    92.85 |   72.72 |   90.64 | ...,73-74,223-231 
  cron-delete.ts   |   97.56 |      100 |   83.33 |   97.56 | 31-32             
  cron-list.ts     |   98.23 |    95.34 |    87.5 |   98.23 | 57-58             
  diffOptions.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  edit.ts          |    82.7 |    86.77 |   81.25 |    82.7 | ...43-744,863-913 
  ...r-worktree.ts |   83.14 |    67.56 |    87.5 |   83.14 | ...84-187,278-279 
  enterPlanMode.ts |      85 |     82.6 |    87.5 |      85 | ...28-133,161-175 
  exit-worktree.ts |   83.29 |    83.65 |   94.44 |   83.29 | ...14-515,537-538 
  exitPlanMode.ts  |      95 |    85.29 |     100 |      95 | ...21-325,344,378 
  ...permission.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  glob.ts          |   96.33 |     88.5 |     100 |   96.33 | ...24-225,373,376 
  grep.ts          |   90.73 |    86.61 |   85.71 |   90.73 | ...76-677,727-728 
  ...adTracking.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  image-gen.ts     |   91.66 |    77.41 |    90.9 |   91.66 | ...13-214,221-222 
  list-agents.ts   |   94.02 |    82.35 |   83.33 |   94.02 | 31-32,47-48       
  loop-wakeup.ts   |   99.27 |    92.85 |     100 |   99.27 | 45                
  ls.ts            |   96.74 |    90.27 |     100 |   96.74 | 176-181,212,216   
  lsp.ts           |   72.71 |     59.5 |   90.32 |   72.71 | ...1212,1214-1215 
  ...nt-manager.ts |   81.63 |       79 |   85.41 |   81.63 | ...3221,3223-3224 
  mcp-client.ts    |   79.83 |    85.09 |   89.47 |   79.83 | ...2233,2237-2240 
  ...ry-timeout.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcp-errors.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...pool-entry.ts |   77.56 |    84.11 |   77.14 |   77.56 | ...1291,1299-1300 
  ...ool-events.ts |       8 |      100 |       0 |       8 | 132-158           
  mcp-pool-key.ts  |   97.46 |    93.93 |     100 |   97.46 | 175-176           
  ...ce-content.ts |   96.55 |    91.17 |     100 |   96.55 | 80-82             
  mcp-retry.ts     |   97.67 |    95.65 |     100 |   97.67 | 131-132           
  mcp-status.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  mcp-tool.ts      |    97.2 |    93.47 |     100 |    97.2 | ...00-801,856-857 
  ...sport-pool.ts |   83.49 |    80.15 |   84.61 |   83.49 | ...1409,1416-1420 
  ...ace-budget.ts |   87.27 |     82.6 |     100 |   87.27 | ...00-305,340-345 
  memory-config.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...iable-tool.ts |     100 |    84.61 |     100 |     100 | 101,108           
  monitor.ts       |   91.74 |    84.28 |   88.46 |   91.74 | ...93,606,804-809 
  notebook-edit.ts |   85.55 |    77.39 |   81.25 |   85.55 | ...86-902,948-949 
  ...escendants.ts |   36.17 |    64.51 |   55.55 |   36.17 | ...46-310,385-390 
  ...nforcement.ts |   82.57 |    90.24 |     100 |   82.57 | 174-185,234-247   
  read-file.ts     |   95.49 |    88.52 |   86.66 |   95.49 | ...49,464,536-537 
  ...p-resource.ts |   96.85 |      100 |   91.66 |   96.85 | 92-96             
  ...d-artifact.ts |   91.18 |    86.71 |    87.5 |   91.18 | ...26-427,441-453 
  ripGrep.ts       |    94.6 |    87.26 |   95.23 |    94.6 | ...33-734,740-741 
  ...-transport.ts |   71.42 |    55.55 |   71.42 |   71.42 | ...36-137,143-144 
  send-message.ts  |   81.13 |    89.74 |    62.5 |   81.13 | ...80-286,363-371 
  ...n-mcp-view.ts |   93.57 |     92.3 |      90 |   93.57 | 122-130           
  shell.ts         |   78.78 |    84.06 |   91.91 |   78.78 | ...5019,5082-5083 
  skill-utils.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  skill.ts         |   91.06 |    93.33 |   89.47 |   91.06 | ...71,475,520-542 
  ...eticOutput.ts |   95.12 |      100 |      80 |   95.12 | 87-88             
  task-create.ts   |    94.4 |    93.33 |   81.81 |    94.4 | 45-49,63-64,95    
  task-list.ts     |   73.38 |    77.77 |   83.33 |   73.38 | ...02,105,109-116 
  task-stop.ts     |   93.14 |    96.15 |   85.71 |   93.14 | 39-40,54-64       
  task-update.ts   |   82.89 |    83.92 |    92.3 |   82.89 | ...14-422,454-465 
  team-create.ts   |   97.22 |    85.71 |   83.33 |   97.22 | 48-49,129-130     
  team-delete.ts   |   86.74 |    83.33 |   83.33 |   86.74 | 37-38,42-48,72-73 
  ...n-approval.ts |   92.14 |    96.77 |   77.77 |   92.14 | 38-39,42-43,93-99 
  todoWrite.ts     |   94.36 |    84.61 |   92.85 |   94.36 | ...10-415,437-438 
  tool-error.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tool-names.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tool-registry.ts |   78.57 |    79.59 |    82.6 |   78.57 | ...89-990,998-999 
  tool-search.ts   |   96.19 |    89.72 |   93.33 |   96.19 | ...09,259-264,426 
  tools.ts         |   92.74 |    91.52 |    91.3 |   92.74 | ...63-564,580-586 
  ...reapproved.ts |   99.27 |    94.11 |     100 |   99.27 | 170               
  web-fetch.ts     |   96.05 |    90.54 |   96.77 |   96.05 | ...85-786,800-801 
  web-search.ts    |   90.53 |    83.57 |      80 |   90.53 | ...1007,1065-1068 
  write-file.ts    |    86.7 |    84.92 |   88.88 |    86.7 | ...24-827,864-899 
  zoom-image.ts    |   95.76 |    93.75 |      90 |   95.76 | 54-59,203-204     
 src/tools/agent   |   86.08 |    85.96 |   87.73 |   86.08 |                   
  agent.ts         |   85.37 |    85.71 |   86.31 |   85.37 | ...4219,4241-4251 
  fork-subagent.ts |   99.32 |       90 |     100 |   99.32 | 81                
 ...tools/artifact |   95.78 |    92.51 |   88.63 |   95.78 |                   
  artifact-tool.ts |   91.46 |    88.46 |   71.42 |   91.46 | ...13-314,322-325 
  ...-publisher.ts |     100 |    85.71 |     100 |     100 | 32                
  ...-publisher.ts |   96.74 |    97.72 |    87.5 |   96.74 | 29-30,156-157     
  html.ts          |     100 |    96.77 |     100 |     100 | 122               
  ...-publisher.ts |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 30                
  oss-publisher.ts |    98.1 |    91.48 |     100 |    98.1 | 43-45             
  publisher.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
 ...s/computer-use |   90.21 |    82.17 |   78.08 |   90.21 |                   
  bootstrap.ts     |   59.42 |    80.95 |   41.66 |   59.42 | ...35-339,341-345 
  client.ts        |   80.11 |       90 |   77.77 |   80.11 | ...97,242-243,274 
  constants.ts     |     100 |    94.73 |     100 |     100 | 129,256           
  downloader.ts    |   65.29 |    52.77 |   58.33 |   65.29 | ...99-300,316-355 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  install-state.ts |   94.44 |    72.72 |     100 |   94.44 | 44-45             
  ...n-detector.ts |     100 |     87.5 |     100 |     100 | 50                
  schemas.ts       |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  tool.ts          |    96.3 |    85.71 |     100 |    96.3 | 75-76,184,252-258 
 ...tools/workflow |   87.46 |    79.41 |   85.71 |   87.46 |                   
  workflow.ts      |   87.46 |    79.41 |   85.71 |   87.46 | ...51-652,664-667 
 src/utils         |   92.81 |    89.71 |   96.82 |   92.81 |                   
  LruCache.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Controller.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ssageQueue.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...cFileWrite.ts |   94.94 |    92.47 |     100 |   94.94 | ...43-544,651-655 
  bareMode.ts      |   81.81 |      100 |      50 |   81.81 | 18-19             
  ...ry-content.ts |   98.45 |    95.45 |     100 |   98.45 | 132-133,159-160   
  browser.ts       |   86.84 |    78.94 |     100 |   86.84 | 34,36-37,65-66    
  btwUtils.ts      |   13.95 |      100 |       0 |   13.95 | 17-31,34-55       
  bundlePaths.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ncyLimiter.ts |   94.64 |    95.23 |     100 |   94.64 | 64-66             
  ...igResolver.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...engthError.ts |   91.06 |    89.47 |     100 |   91.06 | ...46-147,154-155 
  ...n-branches.ts |   95.81 |    93.95 |      95 |   95.81 | ...91-492,504-517 
  ...tion-chain.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  cronDisplay.ts   |     100 |    97.61 |     100 |     100 | 46                
  cronParser.ts    |   95.34 |    93.33 |     100 |   95.34 | 41-42,47-48,70-71 
  debugLogger.ts   |   96.66 |    96.61 |   88.88 |   96.66 | 192-196           
  editHelper.ts    |   93.63 |     83.9 |     100 |   93.63 | ...27-428,462-463 
  editor.ts        |   97.65 |    95.45 |     100 |   97.65 | ...35-336,338-339 
  encoding.ts      |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  env.ts           |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...arResolver.ts |   94.28 |    88.88 |     100 |   94.28 | 28-29,125-126     
  ...entContext.ts |   96.63 |    90.13 |   96.66 |   96.63 | ...42,444-445,512 
  errorParsing.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rReporting.ts |   95.65 |    93.33 |     100 |   95.65 | 37-38             
  errors.ts        |   82.62 |    94.32 |    61.9 |   82.62 | ...62-378,382-388 
  fetch.ts         |   90.68 |    82.51 |     100 |   90.68 | ...72,483-484,503 
  fileUtils.ts     |   94.96 |    93.47 |   96.15 |   94.96 | ...1865,1890-1891 
  forkedAgent.ts   |   92.45 |    82.35 |   93.75 |   92.45 | ...34,642,647-654 
  formatters.ts    |   81.81 |       75 |     100 |   81.81 | 15-16             
  ...eUtilities.ts |    92.4 |    86.95 |     100 |    92.4 | ...52-158,168-169 
  ...rStructure.ts |   94.39 |    94.28 |     100 |   94.39 | ...29-132,343-348 
  getPty.ts        |   31.57 |       50 |     100 |   31.57 | 26-38             
  git-branches.ts  |    91.6 |    84.21 |    92.3 |    91.6 | ...90,405-410,570 
  gitDiff.ts       |   95.19 |    81.36 |     100 |   95.19 | ...1073,1419-1420 
  gitDirect.ts     |   98.84 |    94.28 |     100 |   98.84 | 234,318           
  ...noreParser.ts |   94.48 |    93.22 |     100 |   94.48 | ...23-124,158-159 
  gitUtils.ts      |   78.02 |    81.25 |   85.71 |   78.02 | ...22-123,147-198 
  github-prs.ts    |   95.74 |    82.27 |     100 |   95.74 | 216,314-322       
  iconvHelper.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rePatterns.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  image-view.ts    |   95.12 |    93.33 |     100 |   95.12 | ...68-172,240-244 
  ...ionManager.ts |     100 |     90.9 |     100 |     100 | 27                
  ...lPromptIds.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...on-context.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  jsonl-utils.ts   |   95.27 |    93.25 |     100 |   95.27 | ...16-317,359-362 
  ...-detection.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...iconv-lite.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...simple-git.ts |   96.77 |    91.66 |     100 |   96.77 | 38                
  ...m-headless.ts |      96 |    88.88 |     100 |      96 | 34                
  ...iagnostics.ts |    96.4 |     94.2 |     100 |    96.4 | ...66,293-294,376 
  ...yDiscovery.ts |    92.4 |    89.13 |     100 |    92.4 | ...28,331,522-525 
  ...tProcessor.ts |   94.01 |       90 |     100 |   94.01 | ...47-353,445-446 
  ...Inspectors.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  modelId.ts       |   98.96 |    98.21 |     100 |   98.96 | 153               
  ...kerChecker.ts |    90.9 |    91.66 |     100 |    90.9 | 73-79             
  notebook.ts      |   94.57 |    89.91 |   95.83 |   94.57 | ...21,333,385-387 
  openaiLogger.ts  |   91.66 |    89.74 |     100 |   91.66 | ...26-228,251-256 
  osc8.ts          |   54.26 |    64.86 |   83.33 |   54.26 | ...72-195,197-257 
  partUtils.ts     |     100 |    98.64 |     100 |     100 | 211               
  pathReader.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  paths.ts         |   93.95 |    92.79 |     100 |   93.95 | ...78-479,481-483 
  pdf.ts           |   92.17 |    85.81 |     100 |   92.17 | ...64-565,606-611 
  projectPath.ts   |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  projectRoot.ts   |   71.73 |    78.57 |     100 |   71.73 | 54-66             
  ...ectSummary.ts |   89.62 |    72.41 |     100 |   89.62 | ...40-145,196-199 
  ...tIdContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  proxyUtils.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...rDetection.ts |   71.15 |       86 |     100 |   71.15 | ...-90,96-101,147 
  ...noreParser.ts |   92.63 |    91.66 |     100 |   92.63 | ...77-178,197-198 
  rateLimit.ts     |   93.75 |    89.62 |     100 |   93.75 | ...13,218-219,262 
  ...text-range.ts |   97.29 |    86.93 |     100 |   97.29 | ...59-660,735-736 
  readManyFiles.ts |   96.29 |    87.23 |     100 |   96.29 | 225,276,286-290   
  retry.ts         |   96.09 |    92.52 |     100 |   96.09 | ...67,558-559,577 
  retryContext.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...sification.ts |   97.63 |    97.02 |     100 |   97.63 | ...17,251-252,278 
  retryPolicy.ts   |   97.72 |    90.56 |     100 |   97.72 | 130-131           
  ripgrepUtils.ts  |   90.04 |    93.43 |   95.45 |   90.04 | ...55-565,598-599 
  ...sDiscovery.ts |   97.46 |    93.05 |     100 |   97.46 | ...04,182-183,202 
  ...iagnostics.ts |   83.08 |     67.5 |   92.59 |   83.08 | ...23,543-544,550 
  ...tchOptions.ts |   84.87 |    86.61 |   96.29 |   84.87 | ...71,696,725-734 
  ...odelPrefix.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  runtimeStatus.ts |    97.5 |    89.74 |     100 |    97.5 | 162-163           
  safe-mode.ts     |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  safeJsonParse.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...nStringify.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-child-env.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...aConverter.ts |   98.03 |    97.75 |     100 |   98.03 | 100,102-103       
  ...aValidator.ts |   92.09 |    83.65 |   90.47 |   92.09 | ...60,882-883,896 
  ...r-launcher.ts |   96.35 |    93.97 |   85.71 |   96.35 | ...35-336,347-348 
  sedEditParser.ts |   91.78 |    92.18 |     100 |   91.78 | ...66-569,645-646 
  ...nIdContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...orageUtils.ts |   95.98 |    83.96 |     100 |   95.98 | ...70,386,466,485 
  ...-pager-env.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...fety-rules.ts |     100 |     89.7 |     100 |     100 | ...01,304,309-311 
  shell-utils.ts   |   86.07 |    88.34 |     100 |   86.07 | ...2269,2276-2280 
  ...lAstParser.ts |   98.16 |    91.91 |     100 |   98.16 | ...1244-1246,1256 
  ...ContextEnv.ts |     100 |       92 |     100 |     100 | 50-52             
  ...nlyChecker.ts |   96.33 |    96.57 |     100 |   96.33 | ...83-284,292-293 
  sideQuery.ts     |   86.82 |    86.66 |     100 |   86.82 | ...79-185,187-193 
  ...pEventSink.ts |     100 |       80 |     100 |     100 | 61                
  ...tGenerator.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...ameContext.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  symlink.ts       |   77.77 |       50 |     100 |   77.77 | 44,54-59          
  ...e-encoding.ts |   85.96 |    76.47 |     100 |   85.96 | 58-61,64-65,78-79 
  ...emEncoding.ts |   96.36 |    91.17 |     100 |   96.36 | 59-60,124-125     
  terminalSafe.ts  |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...Serializer.ts |   98.72 |       90 |     100 |   98.72 | 42-43,134,201-203 
  testUtils.ts     |   53.33 |      100 |   33.33 |   53.33 | ...53,59-64,70-72 
  ...-constants.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  textUtils.ts     |      65 |      100 |      75 |      65 | 56-75             
  thoughtUtils.ts  |     100 |    95.65 |     100 |     100 | 99                
  ...-converter.ts |   95.23 |    85.71 |     100 |   95.23 | 36-37             
  ...name-utils.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...-finalizer.ts |   97.66 |     90.9 |     100 |   97.66 | 165-166,168-172   
  tool-utils.ts    |    95.2 |    93.61 |     100 |    95.2 | ...58-159,162-163 
  ...ultCleanup.ts |   54.62 |       64 |      75 |   54.62 | ...03-105,108-134 
  ...Compaction.ts |   96.11 |    96.22 |     100 |   96.11 | ...22-327,329-334 
  ...pt-records.ts |   85.85 |    83.63 |     100 |   85.85 | ...90-394,424-439 
  truncation.ts    |   90.56 |    90.43 |     100 |   90.56 | ...35-443,480-486 
  windowsPath.ts   |   89.47 |    79.31 |     100 |   89.47 | ...57-58,62,90-91 
  ...aceContext.ts |   95.81 |    89.39 |     100 |   95.81 | ...74-275,299-301 
  xml.ts           |    97.8 |    87.69 |     100 |    97.8 | 98-99             
  yaml-parser.ts   |   83.87 |    77.27 |     100 |   83.87 | ...31-234,239-240 
 ...ils/filesearch |   83.68 |    80.38 |   94.69 |   83.68 |                   
  crawlCache.ts    |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  crawler.ts       |   82.47 |    76.22 |      95 |   82.47 | ...1525,1559-1560 
  fileSearch.ts    |   93.78 |    87.67 |     100 |   93.78 | ...71-272,274-275 
  fzfWorker.ts     |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-109             
  ...rkerHandle.ts |   84.05 |    75.43 |   89.47 |   84.05 | ...30-334,340-341 
  ignore.ts        |     100 |    97.36 |     100 |     100 | 187               
  result-cache.ts  |     100 |    93.75 |     100 |     100 | 49                
 ...uest-tokenizer |   69.76 |    75.47 |   85.29 |   69.76 |                   
  ...eTokenizer.ts |   65.72 |    74.02 |    92.3 |   65.72 | ...65-466,479-533 
  index.ts         |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  ...tTokenizer.ts |   68.39 |    69.49 |    90.9 |   68.39 | ...24-325,327-328 
  ...ageFormats.ts |   76.92 |      100 |   33.33 |   76.92 | 46-49,56-57       
  textTokenizer.ts |     100 |      100 |     100 |     100 |                   
  types.ts         |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1                 
-------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------

For detailed HTML reports, please see the 'coverage-reports-22.x-ubuntu-latest' artifact from the main CI run.

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

LGTM, looks ready to ship — CI landed green after the review. ✅

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Not reviewed: build-and-test — Test (macos-latest, Node 22.x) was skipped in CI and its BSD-sed suite did not run locally.

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

未审查：build-and-test — Test (macos-latest, Node 22.x) was skipped in CI and its BSD-sed suite did not run locally。

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[wenshao]

@qwen-code /takeover

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤝 Takeover engaged: the autofix loop now manages this PR — it will address new review feedback and resolve base conflicts until the label is removed or the round cap is reached. Remove the autofix/takeover label (or comment @qwen-code /takeover stop) to release.

中文说明

🤝 已接管：autofix 循环现在管理此 PR —— 将持续处理新的评审反馈与 base 冲突，直到移除标签或达到轮次上限。移除 autofix/takeover 标签（或评论 @qwen-code /takeover stop）即可释放。

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

✅ AutoFix round 11 finished — view run. See this round's report below.

中文说明

✅ AutoFix 第 11 轮已完成 —— 查看运行。本轮报告见下方。

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 1/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 1/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Review feedback addressed

[Critical] Post-sanitization size cap (rc:3684460746)

Decision: Fixed.

emit_report capped the raw report size but never re-measured after the sed sanitization pipeline. Since escaping &/</>/@ inflates byte count (up to 5×), a report under 45,000 raw bytes could sanitize past GitHub's 65,536-char comment limit, causing a 422 and stranding the "running" status comment permanently.

Change: Added a post-sanitization size check immediately after the sed subshell succeeds. If the sanitized file exceeds the budget, it falls back to emit_block (the escaped <pre> embedding with its own escape-then-cap discipline), mirroring the pattern emit_block already uses.

Test: Added an inflation regression case — a 44,000-byte file of & characters (raw under the 45,000 cap) that sanitizes to ~220,000 bytes, verifying the fallback triggers.

[Suggestion] BRE \| is GNU-only (rc:3684460752)

Decision: Fixed.

The un-escaping sed used BRE \| alternation and \(\) grouping, which are GNU sed extensions. On macOS BSD sed, \| is a literal |, making the allowlist un-escape a no-op and breaking the behavioral test on a platform the suite otherwise supports.

Change: Switched to sed -E (ERE), which is native on both GNU and BSD sed. The pattern \(\/\{0,1\}\)\(details\|summary\|pre\|code\|br\) became (\/{0,1})(details|summary|pre|code|br) — same semantics, portable syntax.

Review-level note

The CHANGES_REQUESTED review noted the macOS CI test was skipped. The ERE fix above makes the sanitizer test portable to BSD sed, so it will pass when the macOS runner executes it.

Verification

• npm run build — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed
• npm run lint — passed
• npx vitest run scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 108 passed (108)

中文说明

审查反馈处理

[Critical] 净化后大小上限 (rc:3684460746)

决定： 已修复。

emit_report 限制的是报告的原始大小，但在 sed 净化管道之后从未重新测量。由于转义 &/</>/@ 会膨胀字节数（最高 5 倍），一个原始小于 45,000 字节的报告净化后可能超过 GitHub 的 65,536 字符评论上限，导致 422 错误并使 "running" 状态评论永久搁置。

修改： 在 sed 子 shell 成功后立即添加净化后大小检查。如果净化文件超过预算，则回退到 emit_block（带自身"先转义再限制"纪律的转义 <pre> 嵌入），与 emit_block 已有的模式一致。

测试： 添加了膨胀回归用例——一个 44,000 字节的 & 字符文件（原始低于 45,000 上限），净化后约 220,000 字节，验证回退触发。

[Suggestion] BRE \| 仅限 GNU (rc:3684460752)

决定： 已修复。

去转义的 sed 使用了 BRE \| 交替和 \(\) 分组，这些是 GNU sed 扩展。在 macOS BSD sed 上，\| 是字面量 |，使白名单去转义变成空操作，并在该测试套件本就支持的平台上导致行为测试失败。

修改： 切换到 sed -E（ERE），在 GNU 和 BSD sed 上均原生支持。模式 \(\/\{0,1\}\)\(details\|summary\|pre\|code\|br\) 变为 (\/{0,1})(details|summary|pre|code|br)——语义相同，语法可移植。

审查级别说明

CHANGES_REQUESTED 审查指出 macOS CI 测试被跳过。上述 ERE 修复使净化器测试可移植到 BSD sed，因此当 macOS 运行器执行时将通过。

验证

• npm run build — 通过
• npm run typecheck — 通过
• npm run lint — 通过
• npx vitest run scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 108 通过 (108)

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max-preview

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Reviewed. Suggestions are inline. Not reviewed: build-and-test — Test (macos-latest, Node 22.x) was skipped in CI and its BSD-sed suite did not run locally. Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

已审查。 建议见行内评论。 未审查：build-and-test — Test (macos-latest, Node 22.x) was skipped in CI and its BSD-sed suite did not run locally。 未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 2/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 2/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Review feedback addressed

Both inline suggestions from the automated reviewer are implemented. Each named a genuine defect worth fixing in this early round; neither required a maintainer decision.

1. Fold-closer loop can exceed the size cap (rc:3687628086) — fixed

The fold-balancing loop appends opens - closes copies of </details>\n (11 bytes each) after the post-sanitization size gate has already been measured, so a report dense in unbalanced <details> opens could be pushed past max (45000) and past GitHub's 65,536-char comment limit by the closers alone. The failing gh api upsert would then abort the step under set -euo pipefail, stranding the "running" status comment with no terminal report. Since the report is bot-generated but attacker-influenced (prompt injection), this is exactly the threat the sanitizer targets.

Fix: after computing opens/closes, budget for the closer overhead before committing to the markdown path. If sanitized_size + deficit * 11 + 30 (the +30 covers the constant ### Verification report wrapper plus trailing newlines) would exceed max, fall back to the capped escaped-<pre> dump wholesale — the same fallback used for raw/sanitized oversize. Balanced or fold-free reports (deficit <= 0) short-circuit the guard and behave exactly as before.

2. || true fold-count guards untested under pipefail (rc:3687628079) — fixed

The test's emit helper spawns emit_report without set -o pipefail, and every existing fixture contains <details>, so the || true guards on the fold-counting greps — which exist precisely because grep exits 1 on zero matches and the step runs under set -euo pipefail — were never exercised. A future edit dropping a || true would make a fold-free report abort the whole composer, and no test would catch it.

Fix: added a sub-case that spawns under set -o pipefail against a zero-fold report and asserts it still exits 0 and renders. Also added a regression sub-case for fix #1: 100 unbalanced <details> opens whose raw and sanitized sizes both clear max=2000 but whose closer overhead forces the fallback. This sub-case was confirmed load-bearing — it fails with the workflow fix reverted and passes with it.

Conflict notes

--conflict false; no merge was performed and none was needed.

Verification

• npm run lint — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed
• npm run build — passed
• vitest scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js (touched) — 108 passed
• Load-bearing probe: the closer-overhead sub-case fails with the workflow fix reverted and passes with it

中文说明

已处理的审查反馈

自动化审查器的两条行内建议均已实现。每条都指出了一个值得在本轮早期修复的真实缺陷，均无需维护者决策。

1. 折叠闭合循环可能超出大小上限（rc:3687628086）— 已修复

折叠配平循环会在净化后大小闸门已经测量之后，追加 opens - closes 个 </details>\n（每个 11 字节），因此一份密集包含未配平 <details> 开标签的报告，可能仅凭这些闭合标签就被推过 max（45000）以及 GitHub 的 65,536 字符评论上限。随后失败的 gh api upsert 会在 set -euo pipefail 下中止该步骤，把 "running" 状态评论永久搁置、没有终态报告。由于报告由 bot 生成但受攻击者影响（prompt injection），这正是净化器要防的威胁。

修复：在算出 opens/closes 后、提交 markdown 路径前，先计入闭合标签开销。若 sanitized_size + deficit * 11 + 30（+30 覆盖恒定的 ### Verification report 包装及末尾换行）会超出 max，则整体回退到带大小上限的转义 <pre> 嵌入——与原始/净化后超大所用的回退一致。配平或无折叠的报告（deficit <= 0）会短路该守卫，行为与之前完全相同。

2. || true 折叠计数保护在 pipefail 下未被测试（rc:3687628079）— 已修复

测试的 emit 辅助函数在 spawn emit_report 时没有加 set -o pipefail，且每个现有 fixture 都含 <details>，因此折叠计数 grep 上的 || true 保护——其存在正是因为 grep 在零匹配时退出 1、而该步骤运行在 set -euo pipefail 下——从未被触发。若未来有人删掉某个 || true，无折叠报告会使整个评论组装器中止，而没有任何测试能抓到。

修复：新增一个子用例，在 set -o pipefail 下对零折叠报告 spawn，并断言其仍退出 0 且正常渲染。同时为修复 #1 新增一个回归子用例：100 个未配平的 <details> 开标签，其原始与净化后大小都低于 max=2000，但闭合标签开销会强制触发回退。该子用例已确认真实有效（load-bearing）——在回退 workflow 修复时失败，应用修复后通过。

冲突说明

--conflict false；未执行合并，也无需合并。

验证

• npm run lint — 通过
• npm run typecheck — 通过
• npm run build — 通过
• vitest scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js（受影响）— 108 通过
• 有效性探针：闭合标签开销子用例在回退 workflow 修复时失败，应用修复后通过

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max-preview

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Reviewed — no blockers. Suggestions are inline. Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

已审查——无阻断问题。 建议见行内评论。 未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] The new test covering emit_report() sanitization is unreachable by any CI job. The file lives outside every npm workspace; the per-workspace vitest commands that CI runs never collect it. A root test:scripts script exists (vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts) but no workflow in .github/workflows/ invokes it. — Concrete cost: if a future edit to the emit_report() sed pipeline breaks sanitization (e.g. a regex typo re-allows <img> or <!--), no CI gate catches it — the regression reaches production comments silently. — Suggested fix: add a CI job (or step in an existing test job) that runs npm run test:scripts, so this file and its siblings gate PRs.

中文说明

覆盖 emit_report() 净化的新测试无法被任何 CI 作业触达。该文件位于所有 npm 工作区之外；CI 运行的各工作区 vitest 命令不会收集它。根级 test:scripts 脚本存在（vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts），但 .github/workflows/ 中无任何工作流调用它。— 具体代价：若未来对 emit_report() sed 管道的编辑破坏了净化（如正则笔误重新允许 <img> 或 <!--），无 CI 闸门捕获——回归将静默进入生产评论。— 建议修复：添加一个 CI 作业（或现有测试作业中的步骤）运行 npm run test:scripts，使此文件及其同级文件成为 PR 闸门。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

Declined — the premise does not hold. This test is reachable in CI: ci.yml's "Run tests and generate reports" step runs the root npm run test:ci, which chains && npm run test:scripts (package.json), and that runs vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts whose include glob covers scripts/tests/**/*.test.{js,ts}. So this file gates every full PR. Verified by running it through that exact config — 108/108 passed. Adding a separate CI job would duplicate an existing gate, so no change was made.

中文说明

拒绝——前提不成立。该测试在 CI 中可达：ci.yml 的 "Run tests and generate reports" 步骤运行根级 npm run test:ci，其后链式调用 && npm run test:scripts（package.json），该脚本运行 vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts，其 include glob 覆盖 scripts/tests/**/*.test.{js,ts}。因此本文件对每个 full PR 构成闸门。已通过该配置实际运行验证——108/108 通过。新增独立 CI 作业会重复已有闸门，故不做更改。

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 3/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 3/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Autofix review round — PR #8147

One commit (fix(triage): annotate emit_report fallbacks with distinct warnings) addressing the automated reviewer's two suggestions. No conflict reported; no merge performed.

Feedback points

1. emit_report fallback branches degrade silently (rc:3687883121) — Implemented (resolved)

Added a distinct ::warning:: annotation before each of the four emit_block fallback branches in emit_report, mirroring the sibling emit_block failure-warning convention (echo "::warning::..." >&2). Each message names its cause so the degradation is attributable in the Actions log:

• report exceeds size cap
• sanitize failed
• sanitized output exceeds size cap
• fold-closer overhead exceeds size cap

On the secondary "(truncated)" title observation: deliberately left unchanged. The sanitize-fail branch falls back because sanitization failed, not because of a size cap — the raw file has already passed the first size gate, so it is not guaranteed to be truncated, and labeling it "(truncated)" would be inaccurate. The stated problem ("at 3 AM the four fallback branches are indistinguishable in the Actions log") is solved by the warning annotations, which is where attribution belongs; the rendered <pre> fallback itself remains the correct safe behavior.

Also added regression assertions in scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js mirroring the existing ::warning::emit_block failed static check, so the four warnings are gated.

2. New test unreachable by any CI job (rc:3687883125) — Declined (premise incorrect)

The finding states that no workflow runs test:scripts, so the new test is dead. That premise does not hold: ci.yml's "Run tests and generate reports" step runs the root npm run test:ci (ci.yml lines 394/589/644), and the root test:ci script chains && npm run test:scripts (package.json line 45), which runs vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts. That config's include glob is scripts/tests/**/*.test.{js,ts}, so qwen-triage-workflow.test.js is collected on every full PR. Verified concretely by running the file through that exact config — 108/108 passed. Adding a separate CI job would duplicate an existing gate, so no change was made.

Verification

• npm run build — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed
• npm run lint — passed
• vitest scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js (touched file, via the test:scripts config CI uses) — 108 passed

中文说明

Autofix 审查轮次 — PR #8147

一个提交（fix(triage): annotate emit_report fallbacks with distinct warnings），处理自动审查器的两条建议。未报告冲突；未执行合并。

反馈点

1. emit_report 回退分支静默降级（rc:3687883121）— 已实现（已解决）

在 emit_report 的四个 emit_block 回退分支前各添加了一条不同的 ::warning:: 注解，仿照同级 emit_block 的失败告警惯例（echo "::warning::..." >&2）。每条消息都标明其成因，使降级在 Actions 日志中可归因：

• report exceeds size cap（报告超出大小上限）
• sanitize failed（净化失败）
• sanitized output exceeds size cap（净化后输出超出大小上限）
• fold-closer overhead exceeds size cap（折叠闭合开销超出大小上限）

关于次要的 "(truncated)" 标题观察：刻意保持不变。净化失败分支回退是因为净化失败，而非大小上限——原始文件已通过第一道大小闸门，因此不保证被截断，标注 "(truncated)" 会不准确。所述问题（"凌晨 3 点时四个回退分支在 Actions 日志中无法区分"）已由告警注解解决，归因信息正应放在日志中；渲染出的 <pre> 回退本身仍是正确的安全行为。

同时在 scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js 中添加了回归断言，仿照现有的 ::warning::emit_block failed 静态检查，使这四条告警受到闸门保护。

2. 新测试无法被任何 CI 作业触达（rc:3687883125）— 拒绝（前提不成立）

该发现称无任何工作流运行 test:scripts，因此新测试是死代码。该前提不成立：ci.yml 的 "Run tests and generate reports" 步骤运行根级 npm run test:ci（ci.yml 第 394/589/644 行），而根级 test:ci 脚本链式调用 && npm run test:scripts（package.json 第 45 行），该脚本运行 vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts。该配置的 include glob 为 scripts/tests/**/*.test.{js,ts}，因此 qwen-triage-workflow.test.js 在每个 full PR 上都会被收集。已通过该配置实际运行该文件具体验证——108/108 通过。新增独立 CI 作业会重复已有闸门，故不做更改。

验证

• npm run build — 通过
• npm run typecheck — 通过
• npm run lint — 通过
• vitest scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js（触及的文件，经由 CI 使用的 test:scripts 配置）— 108 通过

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max-preview

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Reviewed. Suggestions are inline. Not reviewed: build-and-test — Test (macos-latest, Node 22.x) was skipped in CI and its BSD-sed suite did not run locally. Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

已审查。 建议见行内评论。 未审查：build-and-test — Test (macos-latest, Node 22.x) was skipped in CI and its BSD-sed suite did not run locally。 未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[wenshao]

Overview

Replaces the escaped <pre><code> embedding of report.md with a new emit_report that renders it as markdown, sanitized by a 6-stage sed chain (escape & < > → un-escape the details|summary|pre|code|br allowlist → break <!-- → @→@), a <details> balancer, and four attributable fallbacks to emit_block.

The motivation is right, and several details are well judged: every degradation announces itself in the Actions log rather than silently downgrading; the || true on the zero-match grep is a genuine catch under the step's set -euo pipefail; budgeting deficit * 11 closer bytes before committing to the markdown path is the kind of thing that usually gets found in production instead. The tests spawn real bash against the real extracted helper rather than asserting on YAML text.

Two of the four claimed guarantees don't survive contact, though, and one of them is the readability claim the PR exists for.

---

1. The escaping still produces 乱码 — it just moved into code spans and fences

CommonMark/GFM does not decode entity references inside code spans or code blocks — they are rendered literally. The sanitizer at qwen-triage.yml:3359-3362 escapes & < > @ unconditionally, with no awareness of fence or backtick context, so every one of them inside a backtick span or a ``` block reaches the reader as & / < / > / @ — the exact && symptom the PR description cites from #8140.

I drove the PR's real emit_report (extracted from .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml @ 09375d0 the same way the new test does) over a report shaped the way verify-pr/SKILL.md mandates, then rendered the result through a CommonMark/GFM renderer.

report.md (input):

| head | `npm test -- --run && echo ok` | ✅ |

```bash
npm run build && node scripts/probe.mjs --pkg @qwen-code/qwen-code-core
```

Types touched: `Map<string, Array<T>>` and `a && b || c`.

emit_report output (raw comment body):

| head | `npm test -- --run && echo ok` | ✅ |

```bash
npm run build && node scripts/probe.mjs --pkg @qwen-code/qwen-code-core
```

Types touched: `Map<string, Array<T>>` and `a && b || c`.

Rendered HTML — the entities are re-escaped, i.e. they are displayed:

<code class="language-bash">npm run build &amp;amp;&amp;amp; node scripts/probe.mjs --pkg &amp;#64;qwen-code/qwen-code-core</code>
<code>Map&amp;lt;string, Array&amp;lt;T&amp;gt;&amp;gt;</code>

What the reader sees:

npm run build && node scripts/probe.mjs --pkg @qwen-code/qwen-code-core
Map<string, Array<T>>

This is not an edge case for this report format specifically. SKILL.md makes it the norm: the verdict line is `merge-ready`, every finding carries "the exact reproducing command", and the A/B table's cells are commands. Prose gets better under this PR; the commands a reader actually needs to copy get no better, and generic types get worse than nothing. Separately, escaping > also kills every blockquote in the report.

Two fixes, cheap and full.

Cheap (stays in sed). &-escaping is not a security control — a decoded entity produces text, never markup, so <img> in the source renders as the literal characters <img> either way. Escaping > isn't one either, once < is escaped. Narrowing both recovers &&, ->, |, and blockquotes:

sed -E -e 's/&(#[0-9]+|#[xX][0-9a-fA-F]+|[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*);/\&\1;/g' \
       -e 's/</\&lt;/g' \
       -e 's/&lt;(\/{0,1})(details|summary|pre|code|br)>/<\1\2>/g' \
       -e 's/&lt;!--/\&lt;!\\-\\-/g'

I ran this against a mixed fixture: && and blockquotes survive, <img src=x onerror=…> is still neutralized, the marker is still broken, and the allowlisted tags still go live. < and @ inside code spans stay mangled, so this is partial.

Full (node). This step already shells out to node for the UTF-8-safe cut in emit_block, so a small node sanitizer is within existing convention and can be code-region aware. The precise rule: the <!-- break must stay global — the upsert's contains("<!-- qwen-triage:verify-state=running -->") greps the raw body, where a fence's contents appear verbatim — but the < / & / @ escapes can be skipped inside fences and code spans, because there <img> is inert text and the mention filter never fires on a code/pre ancestor anyway. That yields both full fidelity and a tighter security story than the current unconditional pass.

Whatever the fix, the fixture at qwen-triage-workflow.test.js should grow a backtick span and a fenced block — their absence is precisely why this slipped through. expect(out).toContain('&&') currently pins the mangling as intended behavior.

2. Guarantee #4 (fold balancing) is defeated by a </details> inside a code fence

opens/closes at :3379-3380 are raw grep -o counts over the whole sanitized file, so a </details> that is inert text inside a fence is counted as a real closer. A report with one genuinely unclosed fold plus a fenced block quoting </details> balances to zero, no closers are appended, and the footer is swallowed — the exact outcome the guarantee is written to prevent. Reproduced against the PR's helper:

<details>
<summary>fold that never closes</summary>

```html
</details>
```

opens=1 closes=1 → deficit 0 → nothing appended. Rendering the assembled body confirms the evidence section and — Qwen Code · sandboxed verification footer end up inside the collapsed fold.

The mirror case is unhandled too: closes > opens produces no correction. That's inert while the report sits at top level, but it becomes load-bearing the moment anything wraps it (see #4).

If the counting moves into the node pass suggested above, it can skip code regions for free.

3. "Same security floor" isn't the whole picture — markdown constructs are now live

The four guarantees are all about HTML tags, but the change also promotes the report from inert text to parsed markdown. Verified against the PR's helper:

![tracker](https://attacker.example/pixel.png)
[Click here to approve the PR](https://attacker.example/phish)

→ renders as a live <img> and a live <a>. Under emit_block both were literal text.

report.md is agent output produced in a sandbox that executed untrusted PR code, and SKILL.md explicitly warns the agent that PR text will try to steer it. A phishing link rendered under the bot identity in a maintainer-facing comment is a modest but real new surface (images are camo-proxied, so those are mostly noise). This may well be an acceptable trade — it just isn't currently named as one. Worth either stating it as accepted in the header comment, or defusing link targets.

4. The report is no longer collapsed, and SKILL.md now says something false

emit_report emits the report at top level under ### Verification report, so up to 45 KB of report now expands inline in the PR conversation where it previously cost one collapsed line. That's a real UX decision and I don't think it's obviously wrong, but it should be deliberate — wrapping the rendered markdown in <details open> (or plain <details>; markdown inside works given a blank line after </summary>) would get the rendering win without the wall. If you do wrap it, #2's excess-closer case stops being inert and needs handling first.

Either way .qwen/skills/verify-pr/SKILL.md:576 is now stale — it justifies putting 中文摘要 immediately after the verdict "because the whole report is already inside a <details> on the PR", which this PR makes untrue. Behavior change and the doc that describes it should ship together.

Nits

• Size cap is no longer a bound on the emitted section. The deficit branch budgets + deficit * 11 + 30, but the normal path doesn't account for the ~27 bytes of ### Verification report\n\n + trailing newlines, so a report at exactly max emits max + 27. Harmless at 45000 vs 65536, but the asymmetry with the branch right above it reads as an oversight.
• qwen-triage.yml:3364 — the sanitize-failure fallback uses the summary 'Verification report (report.md)' while the three size fallbacks say ', truncated'. The sanitize-failure path does go through emit_block's truncation, so it can silently truncate under a non-truncated label.
• The test's tag-allowlist regex /<(?!\/?(details|summary|pre|code|br)\b)[a-z]/g only catches lowercase tag starts. < is unconditionally escaped so nothing can slip through today, but [A-Za-z] costs nothing.
• Guarantee 如何自定义密钥文件 .env可能与其他文件冲突 #3 (@ → @) is asserted at the raw-output level only. The in-repo precedent (qwen-triage-finalize.yml:108) applies it inside a <code> cell, where mentions never fire regardless — this is the first use in free prose, where GitHub's mention filter runs on the parsed DOM with the entity already decoded. Probably fine, but it's an untested assumption carrying a guarantee; one throwaway comment in a scratch repo settles it.

---

Summary: the direction is right and the fallback discipline is genuinely careful, but as it stands the readability win lands on prose while the commands, paths, and types — the part of a verification report a reader has to act on — stay mangled, and the fold guarantee has a hole. The narrow-&/drop-> sed change is a small diff that recovers most of it; the node sanitizer recovers all of it and subsumes #2.

中文说明

方向正确，但两条保证没有成立。

1. 转义产生的乱码没有消失，只是搬进了代码块。 CommonMark/GFM 在代码跨度（`）和围栏块内不解析实体引用，直接按字面显示。:3359-3362 的 sed 无条件转义 & < > @，不区分代码上下文，因此报告里每一处 &&、<、@ 都会以 &&、<、@ 呈现给读者——正是 PR 描述从 refactor(core): extract workflow run ownership #8140 引用的那个症状。我用 PR 头部（09375d0）真实的 emit_report 驱动了一份符合 SKILL.md 规定形态的报告，再经 GFM 渲染器验证：npm run build && … 显示为 npm run build && …，Map<string, T> 显示为 Map<string, T>。而 SKILL.md 要求每条 finding 都附"精确复现命令"、判定行用 `merge-ready`、A/B 表格单元格就是命令——散文变好了，读者真正要复制的命令没有。此外转义 > 还使报告里所有引用块失效。

   两种修法。 转义 & 并非安全控制（实体解码产出的是文本，永远不会成为标记），转义 > 在 < 已转义后也不是；收窄这两条即可恢复 &&、->、| 与引用块（正文给出了验证过的 sed）。完整修法：该步骤本就调用 node 做 UTF-8 安全截断，写一个感知代码区域的 node 净化器合乎既有约定——关键规则是 <!-- 的打断必须全局（upsert 的 contains(…) grep 的是原始 body，围栏内容原样出现），而 </&/@ 的转义可在围栏与代码跨度内跳过（那里 <img> 本就是惰性文本，提及过滤器也从不在 code/pre 祖先下触发）。无论采用哪种，测试 fixture 都应补上反引号跨度与围栏块——它们的缺席正是此问题漏网的原因，而 expect(out).toContain('&&') 目前把乱码钉成了预期行为。

2. 折叠配平被围栏内的 </details> 击穿。 :3379-3380 的计数是对整个文件的裸 grep -o，围栏内作为惰性文本的 </details> 被当作真实闭合。一个真未闭合的折叠 + 一段引用了 </details> 的围栏块 → 计数配平 → 不补闭合 → 页脚被吞，正是该保证要防的结果（已用 PR 的 helper 复现）。反向情形（闭合多于打开）同样未处理：目前报告位于顶层所以无害，但一旦外层包裹就变成承重问题。

3. "同等安全底线"并不完整。 四条保证都针对 HTML 标签，但改动同时把报告从惰性文本提升为被解析的 markdown：[点此批准](https://attacker.example/phish) 现在会渲染成活链接（emit_block 下是字面文本）。report.md 是在执行过不可信 PR 代码的沙箱里产出的 agent 输出，以 bot 身份渲染的钓鱼链接是一个不大但真实的新面。这或许是可接受的权衡，只是目前没有被明说。

4. 报告不再折叠，且 SKILL.md 已失真。 最多 45 KB 的报告现在在 PR 会话里完全展开，此前只占一行。建议明确决策（<details open> 可兼得渲染与不刷屏；若要包裹，需先处理 Where is the config saved? #2 的多余闭合）。同时 .qwen/skills/verify-pr/SKILL.md:576 仍以"整个报告已在 PR 的一个 <details> 内"为由说明 中文摘要 的位置——本 PR 使该前提不再成立，行为改动与描述它的文档应同批发布。

细节：正常路径未把 ### Verification report 的约 27 字节计入上限（紧邻的 deficit 分支却计了 +30）；:3364 净化失败回退用了不带 , truncated 的标题，但该路径确实会截断；测试的白名单正则只覆盖小写起始；保证 #3 的 @ 只在原始输出层断言，仓库既有先例（qwen-triage-finalize.yml:108）是在 <code> 单元格内（那里本就不触发提及），这是首次用于自由散文，值得用一条一次性评论坐实。

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 4/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 4/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Review feedback addressed on PR #8147

This round replaces the unconditional sed escaping in emit_report with a
code-region-aware node sanitizer, re-collapses the rendered report, and fixes
the smaller items. All three inline suggestions and every point in @wenshao's
review are addressed below. No base conflict (--conflict false); nothing was
merged.

Inline suggestions

• rc:3688189958 — escape substitutions duplicate html_escape(). Resolved.
  The inline sed escape pipeline is gone entirely: escaping now lives in one
  place, the node sanitizer, so there is no second copy of the escape logic to
  drift out of sync.
• rc:3688189962 — <pre> un-escaped but the balancer only closes <details>.
  Resolved. The tag allowlist is narrowed to details|summary (the only tags
  the report uses as raw HTML); pre/code/br are no longer un-escaped, so
  an unclosed <pre> can no longer start a type-1 HTML block that runs to end
  of document. Fenced code blocks need no un-escape — GFM emits <pre><code>
  itself.
• rc:3688189965 — fold counter counts <details>/</details> textually.
  Resolved. Folds are now counted over prose only (code spans and fenced blocks
  are excluded), so a </details> quoted in code is inert text and can no
  longer defeat guarantee 4. Surplus closers are dropped and unclosed opens are
  closed.

@wenshao's review

1. Escaping still mangles code spans/fences. Fixed — this is the core of
   the round. emit_report now runs a node sanitizer (same convention as
   emit_block's UTF-8-safe cut) that splits the report into code regions and
   prose. In prose, < is escaped (then only details/summary are
   un-escaped back to live tags) while & and > are left alone — they are
   not security controls once < is escaped, and escaping them was what killed
   &&, ->, and blockquotes. In code spans/fences, < & @ are left
   alone because CommonMark renders them literally there (escaping produced the
   && / Map<string> / @pkg garbage) and <img> /
   mentions are inert under a code/pre ancestor. Verified by driving the real
   extracted helper: npm run build && node probe.mjs --pkg @qwen-code/core
   and `Map<string> @pkg` now survive verbatim, prose && and
   blockquotes survive, and <img src=x onerror=…> in prose is still
   neutralized to <img …>. The fixture grew a backtick span and a fenced
   block (their absence is what let this slip through), and the old
   expect(out).toContain('&&') that pinned the mangling is replaced
   by not.toContain('&&') plus verbatim-code assertions.
2. Guarantee 4 defeated by a </details> inside a fence. Fixed by the
   prose-only fold count above. The review's exact reproduction (one unclosed
   fold plus a fenced </details>) is now a regression test: the fenced closer
   is ignored and the live fold gets an appended closer. The mirror case
   (closes > opens) is handled too — surplus closers are dropped so they
   cannot close the wrapping fold early (load-bearing now that the report is
   wrapped, see Are you interested in AI Terminal? #4).
3. Markdown constructs (links/images) are now live. Named, not changed.
   The header comment now states the tradeoff explicitly: rendering promotes
   the report from inert text to parsed markdown, so [links](…) and
   ![images](…) render live; report.md is sandboxed agent output, images
   are camo-proxied (mostly noise), and a phishing link under the bot identity
   is the residual surface. I took the "state it as accepted in the header
   comment" option rather than defusing link targets, since that is
   non-behavior-changing; defusing targets is recorded there as a deliberate
   follow-up if maintainers want it.
4. Report no longer collapsed + SKILL.md stale. Fixed. The rendered
   report is wrapped in a collapsed <details> (<summary>Verification report</summary>), restoring the one-line footprint the markdown rendering
   replaced — the report still renders as real markdown when opened. I chose
   plain collapsed <details> over <details open> to match the pre-PR
   footprint and the existing emit_block convention; switching to open is a
   one-word change if maintainers prefer default-expanded. Wrapping made
   .qwen/skills/verify-pr/SKILL.md:576 accurate again rather than stale: that
   line justifies the 中文摘要 placement "because the whole report is already
   inside a <details> on the PR," which the wrap restores — so the doc needs
   no edit and behavior and doc ship consistent.

Nits

• Size cap not a bound on the emitted section. Fixed: the gate now measures
  the whole wrapped output (wrapper + balanced report + appended closers)
  against max, removing the asymmetry with the old deficit branch.
• Sanitize-failure fallback label. Fixed: it now says Verification report (report.md, truncated) like the other fallbacks (it does go through
  emit_block's truncation).
• Test allowlist regex lowercase-only. Fixed: now [A-Za-z], and narrowed
  to details|summary to match the new allowlist.
• Guarantee 3 (@→@) untested in free prose. Kept @ (unchanged
  behavior, matches the in-repo precedent) and the test still asserts
  @everyone in prose. Flag, not a fix: I could not run the
  scratch-repo confirmation in this environment (no network / no GitHub
  credentials). It is worth noting that GitHub's mention filter runs on the
  parsed DOM where @ is already decoded to @, so this assumption may
  not hold in free prose the way it does inside a <code> cell. A one-line
  scratch comment settles it; if it fails, the fix is a zero-width-space break
  (@​) or wrapping the mention in code. Left for a maintainer to
  confirm rather than changing a security mechanism on an unverified guess.

Also restored, caught in self-audit: the node sanitizer strips NUL bytes
(.replace(/\u0000/g, "")) for parity with the old tr -d '\000' and
emit_block, with a regression test.

Conflict notes

None. --conflict false; origin/main was not merged.

Verification

• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 108 passed (includes the rewritten emit_report test, the new guarantee-4/surplus/NUL cases, and the updated layout assertion).
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-triage-finalize-workflow.test.js — passed.
• npx eslint scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — clean.
• npm run lint — passed.
• npm run typecheck — passed.
• npm run build — passed.
• Standalone harness driving the real extracted emit_report over a mixed fixture (prose &&/generics, backtick span, fenced <img>/</details>/<!\-\- marker -->, blockquote, unclosed + surplus folds) — all prose-fidelity, code-fidelity, security-floor, and fold-balance checks passed; edge cases (oversize, <-inflation, 100-fold density, pipefail no-folds, empty file) fall back or render as expected.

中文说明

已在 PR #8147 上处理的评审反馈

本轮将 emit_report 中无条件的 sed 转义替换为感知代码区域的 node 净化器，重新把渲染后的报告折叠起来，并修复了若干较小的问题。下方逐条处理了三条行内建议以及 @wenshao 评审中的每一点。无 base 冲突（--conflict false）；未做任何合并。

行内建议

• rc:3688189958 — 转义替换与 html_escape() 重复。 已解决。内联的 sed 转义管道被整体移除：转义现在只存在于唯一一处（node 净化器），因此不再有第二份会失同步的转义逻辑。
• rc:3688189962 — <pre> 被回解但配平器只闭合 <details>。 已解决。标签白名单收窄为 details|summary（报告中唯一作为原生 HTML 使用的标签）；pre/code/br 不再被回解，因此未闭合的 <pre> 不会再启动一个延伸到文档末尾的 type-1 HTML 块。围栏代码块无需回解——GFM 会自行生成 <pre><code>。
• rc:3688189965 — 折叠计数器按文本统计 <details>/</details>。 已解决。折叠现在只在散文中统计（代码跨度与围栏块被排除），因此代码中引用的 </details> 是惰性文本，不再能击穿保证 4。多余闭合标签会被丢弃，未闭合的开标签会被补闭。

@wenshao 的评审

1. 转义仍在代码跨度/围栏中产生乱码。 已修复——这是本轮的核心。emit_report 现在运行一个 node 净化器（与 emit_block 的 UTF-8 安全截断同一约定），把报告切分为代码区域与散文。散文中转义 <（随后只把 details/summary 回解为活标签），& 与 > 保持原样——一旦 < 被转义，它们就不是安全控制项，而正是对它们的转义破坏了 &&、-> 与引用块。代码跨度/围栏中，< & @ 保持原样，因为 CommonMark 在那里按字面渲染（转义会产生 && / Map<string> / @pkg 乱码），且 <img>/提及在 code/pre 祖先下是惰性的。已通过驱动真实提取出的 helper 验证：npm run build && node probe.mjs --pkg @qwen-code/core 与 `Map<string> @pkg` 现在原样保留，散文中的 && 与引用块保留，散文中的 <img src=x onerror=…> 仍被中和为 <img …>。fixture 补充了反引号跨度与围栏块（正是它们的缺席让此问题漏网），并且把原先钉死乱码的 expect(out).toContain('&&') 替换为 not.toContain('&&') 加上代码原样断言。
2. 保证 4 被围栏内的 </details> 击穿。 已由上述"仅散文统计折叠"修复。评审中的精确复现（一个未闭合折叠加一段引用了 </details> 的围栏）现已成为回归测试：围栏内的闭合标签被忽略，活折叠会被补上一个闭合标签。镜像情形（closes > opens）也已处理——多余闭合标签被丢弃，因此不会提前闭合外层包裹折叠（在报告被包裹后这是承重的，见 Are you interested in AI Terminal? #4）。
3. markdown 结构（链接/图片）现在是活的。 已命名，未改动行为。头部注释现在明确陈述该权衡：渲染把报告从惰性文本提升为被解析的 markdown，因此 [links](…) 与 ![images](…) 会渲染为活元素；report.md 是沙箱中的 agent 输出，图片经 camo 代理（基本是噪声），bot 身份下的钓鱼链接是残留面。我选择了"在头部注释中声明为已接受"而非"解除链接目标"，因为前者不改行为；解除目标在那里被记录为一个刻意的后续项，供维护者按需选择。
4. 报告不再折叠 + SKILL.md 失真。 已修复。渲染后的报告被包裹在一个折叠的 <details>（<summary>Verification report</summary>）中，恢复了 markdown 渲染所替换掉的一行占用——打开时仍渲染为真正的 markdown。我选择了普通折叠 <details> 而非 <details open>，以匹配 PR 之前的占用以及既有 emit_block 约定；若维护者偏好默认展开，改成 open 只是一词之差。包裹使 .qwen/skills/verify-pr/SKILL.md:576 重新变为准确而非失真：该行以"整个报告已在 PR 的一个 <details> 内"为由说明 中文摘要 的位置，而包裹恰好恢复了这一前提——因此文档无需编辑，行为与文档一致发布。

细节

• 大小上限不再是发出区段的界。 已修复：该 gate 现在对整个包裹后的输出（包裹标签 + 配平后的报告 + 补上的闭合标签）按 max 度量，消除了与旧 deficit 分支的不对称。
• 净化失败回退的标题。 已修复：现在与其他回退一致写作 Verification report (report.md, truncated)（该路径确实经过 emit_block 的截断）。
• 测试白名单正则只覆盖小写。 已修复：现为 [A-Za-z]，并收窄为 details|summary 以匹配新白名单。
• 保证 3（@→@）在自由散文中未经验证。 保留 @（行为不变，与仓库内先例一致），测试仍在散文中断言 @everyone。这是提醒而非修复： 我在本环境中无法运行 scratch-repo 确认（无网络/无 GitHub 凭据）。值得注意：GitHub 的提及过滤器运行在已解析的 DOM 上，那里 @ 已被解码为 @，因此这一假设在自由散文中可能不像在 <code> 单元格内那样成立。一条一次性 scratch 评论即可坐实；若失败，修法是零宽空格打断（@​）或把提及包进代码。留给维护者确认，而不是在未验证的猜测上改动安全机制。

另外在自审中发现并恢复：node 净化器会剥离 NUL 字节（.replace(/\u0000/g, "")），与旧的 tr -d '\000' 及 emit_block 保持一致，并附有回归测试。

冲突说明

无。--conflict false；未合并 origin/main。

验证

• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 108 通过（含重写的 emit_report 测试、新的保证 4/多余闭合/NUL 用例，以及更新后的布局断言）。
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-triage-finalize-workflow.test.js — 通过。
• npx eslint scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 干净。
• npm run lint — 通过。
• npm run typecheck — 通过。
• npm run build — 通过。
• 独立 harness：用真实提取的 emit_report 驱动一份混合 fixture（散文 &&/泛型、反引号跨度、围栏内的 <img>/</details>/<!\-\- marker -->、引用块、未闭合 + 多余折叠）——所有散文保真、代码保真、安全底线与折叠配平检查均通过；边界情形（超大、< 膨胀、100 折叠密度、pipefail 无折叠、空文件）按预期回退或渲染。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max-preview

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Reviewed — no blockers. Suggestions are inline. Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

已审查——无阻断问题。 建议见行内评论。 未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 5/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 5/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Address Review Summary — PR #8147

Feedback points

1. [rc:3689048201] Unclosed code fence at EOF swallows the footer

Decision: Implemented.

Changes: Added if (inFence) out.push(fc.repeat(fl)); before the fold-closer in the node sanitizer, so a report ending inside an open code fence gets the fence closed before the fold closers and the wrapper's </details> are appended. Updated the guarantee #4 comment to document fence closing alongside fold balancing.

Rationale: The fold-closer already handled unclosed <details> at EOF, but a dangling code fence had the same footer-swallowing effect — everything after the open fence (fold closers, wrapper closer, composer footer) rendered as inert code text with zero log signal. The fix mirrors the fold-closer pattern: one line, same structure.

2. [rc:3689048224] Sanitize-failure fallback is only structurally asserted

Decision: Implemented.

Changes: Added an execution test that overrides node as a bash function returning 1, driving emit_report through the if ! node -e '…'; then … emit_block … fallback branch. Asserts exit 0, <pre><code> output, and the truncated-report summary. Also added a fence-closing execution test (report ending inside an open fence) that verifies the wrapper's </details> lands in prose, not swallowed by the fence.

Rationale: The other two fallbacks (raw oversize, sanitized-output oversize) were already execution-tested; this branch was the only one without a test driving it. The node() override is deterministic and exercises the real shell path — emit_block's own node call degrades to its head -c fallback, so the escaped output still renders.

Verification

• npm run build — passed
• npm run typecheck — passed
• npm run lint — passed
• npx vitest run scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 108 passed (108)

中文说明

审查反馈处理总结 — PR #8147

反馈要点

1. [rc:3689048201] EOF 处未闭合的代码围栏吞掉页脚

决定： 已实现。

变更： 在 node 净化器的折叠闭合逻辑之前添加了 if (inFence) out.push(fc.repeat(fl));，使在打开的代码围栏内结束的报告先闭合围栏，再追加折叠闭合符和外层包装的 </details>。同时更新了保证 #4 的注释，将围栏闭合与折叠配平一并记录。

理由： 折叠闭合符已经处理了 EOF 处未闭合的 <details>，但悬空的代码围栏具有相同的页脚吞没效果——打开的围栏之后的一切（折叠闭合符、外层包装闭合符、组装器页脚）都被渲染为惰性代码文本，且没有任何日志信号。修复方式仿照折叠闭合符的模式：一行代码，相同结构。

2. [rc:3689048224] 净化失败回退分支仅有结构性断言

决定： 已实现。

变更： 添加了一个执行级测试，将 node 覆盖为返回 1 的 bash 函数，驱动 emit_report 走到 if ! node -e '…'; then … emit_block … 回退分支。断言退出码为 0、输出包含 <pre><code> 和截断报告摘要。同时添加了围栏闭合的执行级测试（报告在打开的围栏内结束），验证外层包装的 </details> 落在散文区域而非被围栏吞没。

理由： 另外两条回退（原始超限、净化后超限）已有执行级测试；此分支是唯一没有被测试驱动到的。node() 覆盖是确定性的，且执行了真实的 shell 路径——emit_block 自身的 node 调用降级到 head -c 回退，因此转义输出仍然正常渲染。

验证

• npm run build — 通过
• npm run typecheck — 通过
• npm run lint — 通过
• npx vitest run scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 108 通过（共 108）

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max-preview

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Reviewed — no blockers. Suggestions are inline. Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

已审查——无阻断问题。 建议见行内评论。 未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] The sanitizer's code-region parser is exercised only through backtick fences and single-backtick code spans; its tilde-fence branch and its multi-backtick span run-length matching have no test coverage, so a regression in either branch ships green. — Failure scenario: every fixture uses fences and single-backtick spans, so two mutations survive the suite (verified by probe): deleting `cm[1][0] === fc &&` here (any fence then closes any fence — a `~~~` fence containing a lone line followed by @everyone is misclassified, the mention treated as prose @everyone instead of inert code), and changing m - k === run to === 1 at line 3428 (a two-backtick span wrapping <img src=x> is escaped to <img src=x> instead of being left literal/inert). The sanitizer code itself is correct; this is purely a coverage gap on two parser branches. Fix: add two fixtures to scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — a ~~~ tilde fence containing a ``` line plus an @mention/`` (assert the payload stays inert code, i.e. a literal `@`/`` survives in the raw output), and a prose line with a two-backtick span wrapping ``/`@` (assert it is left literal like the other code spans).

中文说明

净化器的代码区域解析器只通过反引号围栏和单反引号代码跨度被测试；其波浪号围栏分支与多反引号跨度的 run 长度匹配没有测试覆盖，因此这两个分支的回归会绿灯通过。触发场景：所有 fixture 都用 围栏和单反引号跨度，因此两处突变能在测试套件中存活（已用 probe 验证）：删除此处的 `cm[1][0] === fc &&`（任意围栏都能闭合任意围栏——一个包含单独 行、后跟 @everyone 的 ~~~ 围栏会被误判，提及被当作散文 @everyone 而非惰性代码）；将第 3428 行的 m - k === run 改为 === 1（一个包裹 <img src=x> 的双反引号跨度会被转义成 <img src=x> 而非保持字面/惰性）。净化器代码本身正确；这纯粹是两个解析器分支的覆盖缺口。修复：向 scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js 增加两个 fixture——一个包含 ``` 行加 @提及/`` 的 `~~~` 波浪号围栏（断言载荷保持惰性代码，即原始输出中存活字面 `@`/``），以及一行包含包裹 ``/`@` 的双反引号跨度的散文（断言其像其他代码跨度一样保持字面）。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[wenshao]

Local runtime verification — real bash, real renderer

I verified this PR by executing the real workflow bash (not a re-implementation) and rendering its output through GitHub's own renderer, so every claim below is about what a reader actually sees rather than what a string assertion says.

Harness. jobs.publish-verify.steps["Post verification report comment"].run was pulled verbatim out of .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml with PyYAML (head 289df62 and the PR's merge base c3620bc), the html_escape / emit_block / emit_report slice was sourced into bash --noprofile --norc under the step's real set -euo pipefail, and the resulting comment body was rendered with POST /markdown (mode=gfm, repo context) — the same pipeline GitHub uses for comments. The <details> nesting depth of the composer footer was then measured on the parsed DOM.

Fixture. The primary fixture is not synthetic: report.md was reconstructed (12,589 B) by un-escaping the <pre><code> payload of #8140's verify comment — the exhibit this PR was written against.

Result: 26 / 32 assertions pass. The fix itself is decisively proven. Three defects survive, one of which I'd fix before merging.

Verdict	Area
✅	The #8140 symptom is genuinely fixed — proven on the real report, at no size cost
✅	Tag allowlist, marker-forgery break, fallbacks, fold balancing for fences + single-line spans
❌	Guarantee 3 (@ → @ "can never ping") does not hold — regression vs. the path it replaces
❌	Guarantee 4 still defeatable via 4-space indented code blocks and multi-line code spans
⚠️	Entity mangling (the #8140 symptom) still occurs in indented code, deep-indented fences, and CRLF files

---

✅ The fix works — on the real report, through GitHub's renderer

Rendered from the real #8140 report.md	BEFORE (emit_block)	AFTER (emit_report)
<table> elements	0	2
<h1>/<h2>/<h3>	0	6
<strong>	0	33
literal ** left in the output	66	0
<pre> wall	1	0
comment bytes	12,728	12,661 (no inflation)
footer <details> depth	0	0 (still outside every fold)

The collapsed-<details> wrapper means this costs one line in the conversation, exactly as before. Every fallback branch was exercised and all exit 0 under the step's real pipefail, each with its own distinct ::warning:: — oversize raw, sanitized inflation, fold-closer overhead against a 2,000 B cap, sanitizer crash (node stubbed to fail), empty report, missing report.

The security floor also holds where it is claimed: hostile prose produced no dangerous element (rendered tag set was a, br, details, em, h1, p, summary — no img, no script), and no live <!-- survived in the raw body from either prose or a fenced quote, so the startswith / contains upsert grep cannot be forged.

---

❌ Finding 1 — guarantee 3 does not hold (regression; I'd fix before merge)

"Mentions defused — @ becomes @: renders identically, can never ping."

Entity-escaping does not defuse mentions on GitHub. CommonMark decodes @ to @ as ordinary text, and GitHub's mention filter runs after that on the resulting document — so the mention comes back to life.

The raw body is exactly what the PR intends (Ping @everyone and @wenshao now.), and the test's expect(prose).not.toContain('@everyone') passes — but GitHub renders two live <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type=…> anchors pointing at real profiles.

Measured against the real renderer:

Neutralizer	live mention?	visible text
@wenshao (baseline)	yes	@wenshao
@wenshao (this PR)	yes	@wenshao
@ / @	yes	@wenshao
\@wenshao (CommonMark escape)	yes	@wenshao
@​wenshao (zero-width space)	no	@wenshao
`@wenshao` (code ancestor)	no	@wenshao

This is a regression relative to main, not a pre-existing gap: on main the report sits under <pre><code>, and GitHub's mention filter ignores anything with a code/pre ancestor (verified — 0 mentions). The rendering path removes that ancestor, and the replacement control is inert. report.md is untrusted output from an agent that ran PR code in a sandbox, so a crafted PR can make the bot ping arbitrary users or teams.

Suggested fix: in escProse, replace .replace(/@/g, "@") with an inserted zero-width space — .replace(/@/g, "@​") — which I verified renders identically and produces no mention. The test should then assert on the rendered output (or at least on @​), because a raw-string assertion cannot see this class of bug.

Scope of what I proved: the mention renders live (anchor, hovercard, profile href) in GitHub's own pipeline. I did not test notification delivery, since that would mean pinging a real person.

---

❌ Finding 2 — guarantee 4 is still defeatable

"<details> folds are balanced over PROSE only — a </details> quoted in a code span/fence is inert text and is no longer counted."

The code-region model covers fenced blocks and single-line code spans. It does not cover two other CommonMark code regions, and in both the balancer credits a closer that GitHub renders as inert text — so a genuinely open fold gets no closer, eats the wrapper's </details>, and swallows the footer.

</details> located in	balancer	GitHub renders it as	footer depth
prose	counts	live closer	0 ✅
fenced block	ignores	inert code	0 ✅
single-line code span	ignores	inert code	0 ✅
4-space indented code block	counts	inert code	1 ❌
code span wrapping a line	counts	inert code	1 ❌

Minimal repros (both drive the real emit_report):

<details>
<summary>a fold that is genuinely open</summary>

Example:

    echo hi
    </details>

<details>
<summary>a fold that is genuinely open</summary>

Copy: `git log --oneline
and then </details> done`

Impact is presentational, not a security hole — the footer and artifacts line vanish from the collapsed comment. Worth noting the asymmetry I measured: surplus </details> closers are inert (1 or 3 extra closers still leave the footer at depth 0), while an unclosed open is not. So the safe bias is to credit a closer only when it is certainly live, and emit an extra closer when unsure.

(A multi-line code span whose </details> starts at column 0 is fine — an HTML block interrupts the paragraph first, so the closer really is live and the balancer is right to count it. The failing shape is the closer appearing mid-line.)

---

⚠️ Finding 3 — the #8140 symptom persists in three code shapes

The commit that made escaping code-region-aware fixed fences and single-line spans, but these still go through prose escaping and show entities literally (CommonMark does not decode entities in code, which is the PR's own premise):

Shape	type X = Map<string, T> @pkg renders as
fenced block (LF)	type X = Map<string, T> @pkg ✅
4-space indented block	type X = Map&lt;string, T> &#64;pkg ❌
fence indented ≥4 spaces (nested list item)	cat Map&lt;string> &#64;qwen-code/core ❌
fence with CRLF line endings	cat Map&lt;string> &#64;pkg ❌

CRLF is the widest of the three: . does not match \r in JS, so the opening-fence regex never matches and the entire fenced block falls back to prose escaping. Low likelihood on a Linux runner, but it is the same 乱码 class the PR set out to eliminate.

---

Test suite

108/108 pass, as claimed. To check the new suite has teeth I mutated one guarantee at a time in the real workflow YAML and re-ran the new test:

Mutations caught	12 / 14
Caught	prose @ neutralizer · <!-- break in code · allowlist un-escape · prose < escaping · closing unclosed folds · dropping surplus closers · dangling-fence close · NUL strip · code-span inertness · sanitized-size gate · sanitize-failure fallback · <details> wrapper
Survived (both benign)	the <!-- break in prose (redundant — prose < is already &lt;, so a literal <!-- can never form) and the raw-oversize gate (subsumed by the sanitized-output gate; only the emitted warning differs, and the test greps warning strings statically rather than checking which one fired)

---

Recommendation

The core change is sound and the improvement is large and proven — I'd like this merged. Before that, Finding 1 is worth the one-line fix, because it is a security property the PR explicitly claims and a regression against the escaped-<pre> path it replaces. Findings 2 and 3 are narrower and reasonable follow-ups if you'd rather land this now; both are presentational, and Finding 2's failure direction is at least fail-visible rather than silent.

_{Reviewed at 289df62 vs. base c3620bc. Advisory local verification by the maintainer — not a CI check.}

中文版本

本地运行时验证 —— 真实 bash + 真实渲染器

本次验证执行的是工作流的真实 bash（而非复刻实现），并把产物交给 GitHub 自己的渲染器渲染，因此下面每条结论说的都是读者实际看到的东西，而不是字符串断言说了什么。

验证装置。 用 PyYAML 从 .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml 中逐字提取 jobs.publish-verify.steps["Post verification report comment"].run（head 289df62，PR 基线 c3620bc），把 html_escape / emit_block / emit_report 片段 source 进 bash --noprofile --norc，并施加该 step 真实的 set -euo pipefail；产出的评论正文再经 POST /markdown（mode=gfm，带仓库上下文）渲染——与 GitHub 渲染评论的是同一条管线。随后在解析出的 DOM 上测量组装器页脚所处的 <details> 嵌套深度。

语料。 主语料不是构造的：report.md（12,589 B）由 #8140 验证评论中 <pre><code> 载荷反转义还原而来——正是本 PR 所针对的那份实例。

结论：32 条断言通过 26 条。 修复本身得到决定性证明；有三个缺陷存活，其中一个建议合入前修掉。

判定	范围
✅	#8140 症状确实被修复——在真实报告上得证，且无体积代价
✅	标签白名单、标记伪造打断、各回退分支、围栏与单行代码跨度的折叠配平
❌	保证 3（@ → @「永不触发提及」）不成立 —— 相对被替换路径是回归
❌	保证 4 仍可被击穿 —— 4 空格缩进代码块、跨行代码跨度
⚠️	实体乱码（#8140 症状）在缩进代码、深缩进围栏、CRLF 文件中依然出现

✅ 修复有效

真实 #8140 报告经 GitHub 渲染器：表格 0 → 2、标题 0 → 6、加粗 0 → 33、残留字面 ** 66 → 0、<pre> 墙 1 → 0，评论体积 12,728 B → 12,661 B（无膨胀），页脚仍位于所有折叠之外（深度 0）。折叠包裹意味着它在会话中仍只占一行。

所有回退分支均已实测，在该 step 真实的 pipefail 下全部 exit 0，且各自打出独立的 ::warning::：原始超限、净化后膨胀超限、折叠补齐开销顶到 2,000 B 上限、净化器崩溃（把 node 打桩成失败）、空报告、报告缺失。

安全底线在其声称之处也成立：敌意 prose 未渲染出任何危险元素（渲染出的标签集合为 a, br, details, em, h1, p, summary——无 img、无 script）；无论来自 prose 还是围栏内的引用，原始 body 中都不存在活的 <!--，因此 upsert 的 startswith / contains 匹配无法被伪造。

❌ 发现 1 —— 保证 3 不成立（回归，建议合入前修复）

实体转义在 GitHub 上并不能熄火提及：CommonMark 先把 @ 解码为普通文本 @，GitHub 的 mention 过滤器在此之后才在文档上运行，于是提及复活。

原始 body 完全符合 PR 意图（Ping @everyone and @wenshao now.），测试里的 expect(prose).not.toContain('@everyone') 也通过——但 GitHub 渲染出两个指向真实主页的 <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type=…>。

对真实渲染器的实测：@user（基线）、@（本 PR）、@、@、\@（CommonMark 转义）均产生活提及；只有 @​user（零宽空格）与 `@user`（代码祖先）不产生，且显示文本完全一致。

这是相对 main 的回归而非既有缺口：main 上报告位于 <pre><code> 内，而 GitHub 的 mention 过滤器会跳过带 code/pre 祖先的内容（实测 0 提及）。渲染路径移除了该祖先，而替代控制手段是失效的。report.md 是在沙箱中运行 PR 代码的 agent 的不可信输出，因此构造过的 PR 可让 bot 提及任意用户或团队。

建议改法： 在 escProse 中把 .replace(/@/g, "@") 改为插入零宽空格 .replace(/@/g, "@​")——我已验证其显示效果一致且不产生提及。相应地，测试应断言渲染后的结果（至少断言 @​），因为原始字符串断言看不见这一类缺陷。

已证明的范围： 提及在 GitHub 自己的管线中被渲染为活链接（锚点、hovercard、主页 href）。我没有测试通知投递，因为那意味着真的去 ping 一个真人。

❌ 发现 2 —— 保证 4 仍可被击穿

代码区域模型覆盖了围栏块与单行代码跨度，但没有覆盖另外两种 CommonMark 代码区域；在这两种形态下，配平器会把 GitHub 渲染为惰性文本的闭合标签记为有效闭合，于是真正打开的折叠得不到补齐，转而吃掉包裹层的 </details>，把页脚吞进折叠。

</details> 所在位置	配平器	GitHub 渲染为	页脚深度
prose	计数	活闭合	0 ✅
围栏块	忽略	惰性代码	0 ✅
单行代码跨度	忽略	惰性代码	0 ✅
4 空格缩进代码块	计数	惰性代码	1 ❌
跨行代码跨度	计数	惰性代码	1 ❌

影响是呈现层面而非安全问题：页脚与产物说明会从折叠后的评论中消失。另外实测到一个有用的不对称性：多余的 </details> 闭合是惰性的（多 1 个或 3 个闭合，页脚仍在深度 0），而未闭合的打开则不是。因此安全的偏向是——只有在确定闭合为活标签时才计数，不确定时宁可多补一个闭合。

（若跨行代码跨度中的 </details> 位于行首第 0 列则无碍：HTML 块会先打断段落，该闭合确实是活的，配平器计数是正确的。出问题的形态是闭合出现在行中间。）

⚠️ 发现 3 —— #8140 症状在三种代码形态中残留

让转义具备代码区域感知的那次提交修好了围栏与单行跨度，但以下三种形态仍走 prose 转义、字面显示实体（CommonMark 不在代码中解码实体，这正是本 PR 的前提）：围栏块（LF）✅；4 空格缩进代码块 ❌；缩进 ≥4 空格的围栏（嵌套列表项下）❌；CRLF 行尾的围栏 ❌。

其中 CRLF 影响面最大：JS 中 . 不匹配 \r，导致开围栏正则永不匹配，整个围栏块都退回 prose 转义。在 Linux runner 上概率很低，但属于本 PR 意在消灭的同一类乱码。

测试套件

108/108 通过，与描述一致。为检验新用例是否有"牙齿"，我在真实工作流 YAML 上逐条破坏保证并重跑新测试：14 个变异杀死 12 个。

存活的两个均属良性冗余：prose 中的 <!-- 打断（冗余——prose 的 < 已被转义为 <，字面 <!-- 根本无法成形）；原始超限门（被净化后超限门覆盖，只是打出的 warning 文案不同，而测试是静态 grep warning 字符串、并不校验实际触发的是哪一个）。

建议

核心改动是扎实的，改善幅度大且已得证，我希望它被合入。合入之前，发现 1 值得那一行修复——它是 PR 明确声称的安全属性，且相对它所替换的转义 <pre> 路径构成回归。发现 2 与 3 影响面更窄，若希望先合入，作为后续跟进也是合理的：两者都属呈现层面，且发现 2 的失效方向至少是可见的而非静默的。

[wenshao]

Review at 7175d35d — one net-new hole in the same family, measured on GitHub's renderer

Re-reviewed the current head independently rather than diffing my last comment. The round-7 two-line fix is in and correct, and the readability win is real. I found one shape I had not probed before, and it needs no exotic line endings: a fenced block inside a list item. It defeats guarantees 1, 3 and 4 simultaneously. The good news is that a single one-line change closes it and retires the CRLF shape I reported at 16:07, with byte-identical output on every well-formed input including the real report.md.

Harness. jobs.publish-verify.steps["Post verification report comment"].run extracted verbatim with PyYAML from 7175d35d, the html_escape/emit_block/emit_report slice sourced into bash --noprofile --norc under the step's own set -euo pipefail. Every rendering claim is GitHub's own renderer (POST /markdown, mode=gfm, context=QwenLM/qwen-code) applied to the composer's real output. Fold depth is measured on the parsed DOM against a footer sentinel.

---

Overview

emit_report replaces the escaped-<pre> embedding of report.md with a code-region-aware node sanitizer, wrapped in a collapsed <details>. The design is sound and the four guarantees are the right ones. The recurring failure mode across rounds 5→8 is always the same: the sanitizer is a flat line scanner, GitHub is a container-aware CommonMark parser, and every divergence between the two models is a hole. Round 6 closed the fence-in-HTML-block divergence, round 7 closed the code-span-in-HTML-block and list-nested-fold ones. The container divergence below is the last one I can reach.

✅ Confirmed good at this head

• Round 7's inHtml ? balance(escProse(line)) : proseLine(line) and the ^\s* widening both do exactly what they claim — the code-span and list-nested-fold shapes I reported at b0ae340b are closed.
• Real report.md from refactor(core): extract workflow run ownership #8140 (11,677 B, recovered from the posted comment's <pre><code> payload) round-trips with tables, headings, bold and nested folds intact, no entity litter, no size inflation.
• Guarantee 2 (marker forgery) held under everything I threw at it, including this round's shapes: escCode breaks <!-- regardless of context, so the raw body the upsert greps stays unforgeable.
• Blockquote-nested fences are handled safely (control below), and the suite is 108/108 at this head.

---

🔴 Net-new — a fence inside a list item that is never explicitly closed

CommonMark closes an unclosed fenced block at the end of its containing block, not at end of file. The sanitizer only closes at EOF (if (inFence) out.push(fc.repeat(fl))), so once a list-nested fence goes unclosed, inFence stays true for the rest of the document and every remaining line is sent through escCode — which deliberately leaves <, @ and & alone on the premise of a code ancestor. GitHub has already left the code block by then and parses those lines as prose.

Minimal repro (drives the real emit_report):

- step one:

  ```bash
  npm test

Back at top level: @everyone <img src=x onerror=alert(1)> <a href="https://evil.example/phish">click</a>

Measured end-to-end at 7175d35d on GitHub's renderer:

report.md shape	user-mention	live <img>	live <a href>	footer fold depth
list-nested unclosed fence, then unindented prose	1 → github.com/everyone	1	1 (anchor text click)	0 — wrapper closed early instead
list-nested unclosed fence, then a - next item	1	1	—	1 — footer swallowed
blockquote-nested fence (control)	0	0	—	0 ✅
all-LF top-level fence (control)	0	0	—	0 ✅

What breaks, precisely. Guarantee 3 ("@ … can never ping") is false — a live user-mention anchor with a hovercard. Guarantee 1 ("no other tag can form; <img> … never render") is false — <img> and a raw <a href> with attacker-chosen anchor text both form; onerror is stripped, but by GitHub's allowlist, not this sanitizer. That anchor is a disguised link injected as raw HTML, which is a step past the link-rendering tradeoff the PR names in its comment block. Guarantee 4 fails in the second row. Guarantee 2 holds.

Reachability: the PR's own threat model is untrusted agent output from a sandbox that ran PR code, so this is authored, not stumbled into. It is also the more likely accidental shape of the two — an unclosed fence under a bullet is an ordinary authoring slip, whereas the CRLF shape needs mixed line endings.

Fix — one line, measured. Do not guess when the two parsers disagree; use the escape hatch this PR already built:

-              if (inFence) out.push(fc.repeat(fl));
+              if (inFence) process.exit(3);

A fence still open at EOF is a reliable signal that the flat scanner has diverged, so emit_report degrades to emit_block through its existing non-zero-exit branch. Measured:

measurement	7175d35d	with the one-line change
list-nested (both rows above): mentions / live <img> / footer depth	1 / 1 / 0–1	0 / 0 / 0
LF-open + CRLF-close fence (the shape I reported at 16:07)	1 / 1 / 1	0 / 0 / 0
real #8140 report.md, and 6 well-formed/hostile fixtures	—	byte-identical output
scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js	108/108	107/108

The single flip is the PR's own "A report ending inside an open code fence" case, which now takes the fallback instead of being closed at EOF — an intentional behaviour change (degrade rather than guess) that the test should be updated to assert. Worth giving it its own ::warning:: too; today it reuses the sanitize failed label, which would misattribute the cause in the Actions log.

🟡 Re-confirmed still open from round 5 (presentational, deferred)

Both re-measured at this head, both swallow the footer (fold depth 1):

• 4-space indented code block containing </details> — the balancer credits a closer GitHub renders as inert code. It also silently deletes that line from the report when the surplus branch drops it.
• Multi-line code span with a mid-line </details> — same miscount.

Same root cause as above: indented code blocks and multi-line spans are code regions the scanner does not model.

Nits

• Half-escaped tag text is promoted to a live tag. escProse un-escapes /<(\/?)(details|summary)>/, which also matches text that was already <details> in the source — a report trying to show <details> as text gets a real fold instead. <details> (fully escaped) is unaffected. Folds stay balanced, so this is content corruption, not a security issue.
• Predictable temp paths. ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/verify-report-$$ and -out-$$ are guessable; mktemp costs one word and removes the question entirely.
• Performance is a non-issue — I probed proseLine's backtick scan with a 40 k-backtick line and it runs in 0.02 s.

Test coverage

The new suite has real teeth (my earlier mutation run at b0ae340b killed 17/19, both survivors benign). The gap is that no fixture pins the container axis — the suite is green both before and after the fix above. The fixture that would go red is exactly the repro block in this comment: an unclosed fence under a bullet, followed by an unindented line carrying @ and <.

Recommendation

The change is worth landing and the readability improvement is proven on the real artefact. I'd take the one-line fix first: it is the third instance of a single root cause, it closes the previously-reported CRLF shape at the same time, and it costs nothing on well-formed reports. The two round-5 items are reasonable follow-ups — both are presentational and fail visibly.

_{Verified at 7175d35d. Advisory local verification by the maintainer — not a CI check.}

中文版本

在 7175d35d 上的评审 —— 同族新增一个洞，经 GitHub 渲染器实测

我在当前 head 上独立重审，而非拿上一条评论做差。第 7 轮的两行修复已落地且正确，可读性收益属实。本轮发现一个此前未探过的形态，且无需任何特殊行尾即可触发：列表项内的围栏代码块。它同时击穿保证 1、3、4。好消息是一行改动即可关闭它，并同时了结我在 16:07 报告的 CRLF 形态，而在所有良构输入（含真实 report.md）上输出字节一致。

验证装置。 用 PyYAML 从 7175d35d 逐字提取 jobs.publish-verify.steps["Post verification report comment"].run，把 html_escape/emit_block/emit_report 片段 source 进 bash --noprofile --norc，并施加该 step 自身的 set -euo pipefail。所有渲染结论均出自 GitHub 自己的渲染器（POST /markdown，mode=gfm，context=QwenLM/qwen-code）作用于组装器的真实输出；折叠深度在解析后的 DOM 上、以页脚哨兵为基准测量。

概览

emit_report 以「代码区域感知的 node 净化器 + 折叠包裹」替换了 report.md 的转义 <pre> 嵌入。设计是扎实的，四条保证也选得对。第 5→8 轮反复出现的失效模式始终是同一个：净化器是扁平的逐行扫描器，而 GitHub 是具备容器感知的 CommonMark 解析器，两个模型之间的每一处发散都是一个洞。第 6 轮关闭了「HTML 块内的围栏」发散，第 7 轮关闭了「HTML 块内的代码跨度」与「列表内嵌折叠」。下面这个容器发散是我能触达的最后一个。

✅ 本 head 已确认良好

• 第 7 轮的 inHtml ? balance(escProse(line)) : proseLine(line) 与 ^\s* 放宽确实名副其实——我在 b0ae340b 报告的代码跨度形态与列表内嵌形态均已关闭。
• 来自 refactor(core): extract workflow run ownership #8140 的真实 report.md（11,677 B，由已发布评论的 <pre><code> 载荷还原）往返后表格、标题、加粗、嵌套折叠均完好，无实体乱码，无体积膨胀。
• 保证 2（标记伪造）在我施加的所有形态下均成立，含本轮新形态：escCode 无视上下文一律打断 <!--，因此 upsert 所 grep 的原始 body 无法被伪造。
• 引用块内嵌的围栏处理是安全的（见下方对照组），套件在本 head 为 108/108。

🔴 净新 —— 列表项内未显式闭合的围栏

CommonMark 会在其所属容器块结束处闭合未闭合的围栏代码块，而不是在文件末尾。净化器只在 EOF 处闭合（if (inFence) out.push(fc.repeat(fl))），因此一旦列表内嵌的围栏未闭合，inFence 会在文档剩余部分一直为真，后续每一行都走 escCode——而 escCode 基于「存在代码祖先」的前提，刻意不动 <、@、&。彼时 GitHub 早已离开该代码块，把这些行按 prose 解析。

最小复现（驱动真实 emit_report）：

- step one:

  ```bash
  npm test

Back at top level: @everyone <img src=x onerror=alert(1)> <a href="https://evil.example/phish">click</a>

在 7175d35d 上端到端实测，经 GitHub 渲染器：

report.md 形态	user-mention	活 <img>	活 <a href>	页脚折叠深度
列表内嵌未闭合围栏 + 顶格 prose	1 → github.com/everyone	1	1（锚文本 click）	0 —— 但包裹层被提前闭合
列表内嵌未闭合围栏 + - 下一项	1	1	—	1 —— 页脚被吞
引用块内嵌围栏（对照）	0	0	—	0 ✅
全 LF 顶层围栏（对照）	0	0	—	0 ✅

具体击穿了什么。 保证 3（"@ …… 永不触发提及"）为假——渲染出带 hovercard 的活 user-mention 锚点。保证 1（"其余标签永远无法成形；<img> …… 永不渲染"）为假——<img> 与由攻击者指定锚文本的裸 <a href> 均成形；onerror 确实被剥离，但那是 GitHub 的白名单干的，不是本净化器。该锚点是以裸 HTML 注入的伪装链接，已越过 PR 注释块中所声明的「链接会渲染」这一让步。保证 4 在第二行失效。保证 2 成立。

可达性：PR 自己声明的威胁模型就是「在沙箱中运行过 PR 代码的 agent 的不可信输出」，因此这是可被构造的，而非偶遇。它同时也是两者中更容易被无意写出的形态——项目符号下漏闭合围栏是很普通的书写疏忽，而 CRLF 形态需要混合行尾。

修复 —— 一行，已实测。 两个解析器不一致时不要去猜，直接用本 PR 已经建好的降级出口：

-              if (inFence) out.push(fc.repeat(fl));
+              if (inFence) process.exit(3);

EOF 时围栏仍打开，是「扁平扫描器已发散」的可靠信号，于是 emit_report 经其既有的非零退出分支降级到 emit_block。实测：

测量项	7175d35d	打上一行改动后
列表内嵌（上表两行）：提及 / 活 <img> / 页脚深度	1 / 1 / 0–1	0 / 0 / 0
LF 开、CRLF 闭的围栏（我 16:07 报告的形态）	1 / 1 / 1	0 / 0 / 0
真实 #8140 report.md 及 6 个良构/敌意 fixture	—	输出字节一致
scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js	108/108	107/108

唯一翻转的是 PR 自带的*"报告结束于未闭合围栏"*用例——它现在走降级而非在 EOF 补齐围栏。这是有意的行为变更（宁可降级，不去猜），相应地该用例应改为断言降级形态。另建议为它配一条独立的 ::warning::：目前它复用 sanitize failed 文案，会在 Actions 日志中误报归因。

🟡 第 5 轮报告、当前仍开（呈现层，已延后）

两者均在本 head 重新测量，且均吞掉页脚（折叠深度 1）：

• 4 空格缩进代码块中的 </details>——配平器把 GitHub 渲染为惰性代码的闭合记为有效；且走多余闭合分支时会静默删除报告中的该行。
• 跨行代码跨度中位于行中间的 </details>——同样误计。

根因与上文相同：缩进代码块与跨行代码跨度都是扫描器未建模的代码区域。

细节问题

• 半转义的标签文本被提升为活标签。 escProse 回解 /<(\/?)(details|summary)>/，这同样匹配源文件中本来就是 <details> 的文本——一份想把 <details> 作为文本展示的报告，会得到一个真实折叠。<details>（完全转义）不受影响。折叠仍配平，因此这是内容损坏而非安全问题。
• 可预测的临时文件路径。 ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/verify-report-$$ 与 -out-$$ 可被猜到；改用 mktemp 只需一个词，可彻底消除该问题。
• 性能不是问题——我用 4 万个反引号的单行探测 proseLine 的反引号扫描，耗时 0.02 s。

测试覆盖

新套件是有"牙齿"的（我在 b0ae340b 上的变异测试杀死 17/19，两个存活者均属良性）。缺口在于没有任何 fixture 钉住容器这一维度——上述修复打与不打，套件都是绿的。能让它变红的 fixture 恰是本评论中的复现块：项目符号下未闭合的围栏，其后跟一行带 @ 与 < 的顶格文本。

建议

这个改动值得合入，可读性提升已在真实产物上得证。我建议先取那一行修复：它是同一根因的第三个实例，同时关闭此前已报的 CRLF 形态，且在良构报告上零代价。第 5 轮的两项作为后续跟进是合理的——两者都属呈现层且失效可见。

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 8/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 8/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Autofix review round — PR #8147

Addressed the round-8 review from @wenshao. The net-new container-axis hole is closed by degrading to the existing escaped-pre fallback whenever a code fence is still open at EOF, exactly as recommended.

Feedback triage

🔴 Critical — fence inside a list item, never explicitly closed (fixed). CommonMark closes an unclosed fenced block at the end of its containing block, not at EOF; the flat sanitizer only closed at EOF, so a list-nested unclosed fence left inFence true for the rest of the document and shipped the trailing unindented prose through escCode (which leaves <, @, & alone) — a live mention, <img>, and raw <a href> on GitHub's renderer. Fix: a fence still open at EOF is a reliable signal the flat scanner diverged from GitHub's container-aware parser, so the sanitizer now does process.exit(3) instead of guessing a closer. emit_report catches the non-zero exit through its existing fallback branch and degrades to the escaped <pre> embedding. Measured end-to-end against the review's repro: the hostile line now lands fully escaped (<img…>, <a href…>) inside <pre><code>, where the @mention is inert under the code/pre ancestor. This also retires the LF-open/CRLF-close shape reported earlier, and is byte-identical on every well-formed report (a closed fence never reaches the new exit).

Distinct ::warning:: (fixed). The EOF-open-fence degrade previously would have reused the sanitize failed label and misattributed the cause in the Actions log. The fallback now captures the sanitizer's exit code and emits a dedicated warning — emit_report fell back to escaped embedding (report ended inside an open code fence) — for exit 3, keeping sanitize failed for any other non-zero exit. This matches the existing design (each fallback branch already announces itself).

Test coverage — container axis (added). Rewrote the "report ending inside an open code fence" case to assert the new degrade (escaped <pre>, truncated header, and the distinct warning on stderr) instead of the old EOF-close. Added the fixture the review named as the one that goes red before / green after: an unclosed fence under a bullet followed by an unindented line carrying @everyone, <img>, and <a href> — asserted to degrade to the escaped pre with no live <img>/<a href>. Also added the new warning string to the helpers assertion (three warnings → four).

Nit — predictable temp paths (fixed). Replaced ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/verify-report-$$ and -out-$$ with mktemp, removing the guessable-path question entirely.

Nit — half-escaped tag text promoted to a live tag (declined). escProse un-escaping <(details|summary)> also matches source text that was already <details>, turning a report that tries to show <details> as text into a real fold. Declined: as the review notes this is content corruption, not a security issue (folds stay balanced; the fully-escaped <details> is unaffected). A correct fix has to distinguish "a tag I just escaped" from "a < already in the source", which conflicts with the deliberate leave-&-alone readability design (escaping & would mangle &&) and requires reworking the security-critical escape ordering — regression risk disproportionate to a rare, visibly-failing content edge. Worth a follow-up if it ever surfaces in a real report.

Round-5 presentational items — indented code block / multi-line code span (deferred). Both re-confirmed by the review as presentational only, failing visibly (footer swallowed), with the same root cause (code regions the flat scanner does not model). Deferred to a follow-up, per the review's own recommendation to land this one-line fix first.

Conflict notes

--conflict false; no merge performed. (Note: the branch is currently 55 commits behind origin/main; unrelated to this change and left as-is.)

Verification

• npm run build — passed (exit 0).
• npm run lint — passed (exit 0; eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx && eslint integration-tests).
• npx eslint scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — passed.
• npx prettier --check scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — passed (no reformat needed).
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 108/108 passed, including the rewritten EOF-fence case and the new container-axis fixture.
• YAML validity (js-yaml parse of .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml) — valid (7 jobs, publish-verify present).
• End-to-end emit_report (helpers extracted from the real workflow step): the review's container repro degrades to the escaped <pre> with the hostile tags escaped and the distinct warning on stderr; a well-formed report with a closed fence still renders as sanitized markdown with no fallback.
• npm run typecheck — 1 pre-existing error, unrelated to this change: packages/acp-bridge/src/status.ts(975,14): error TS2741: Property '[HookEventName.SessionDelete]' is missing. Evidence it is pre-existing base drift, not introduced here: (a) this PR touches only a workflow YAML and a test .js, neither compiled by tsc; (b) the identical error reproduces on the clean tree with this change stashed; (c) the branch is 55 commits behind origin/main, which already adds the missing entry (packages/acp-bridge/src/status.ts:1020); (d) npm run build passes. The workflow's independent CI (fresh checkout that updates base) is the final verification gate.

中文说明

Autofix 评审轮次 — PR #8147

处理了 @wenshao 的第 8 轮评审。新增的容器维度（container-axis）漏洞已关闭：只要文件末尾仍有未闭合的围栏代码块，就降级到既有的转义 <pre> 兜底，与建议完全一致。

反馈分类

🔴 严重 —— 列表项内未显式闭合的围栏（已修复）。 CommonMark 会在未闭合围栏代码块所属容器块结束处闭合它，而非在文件末尾；扁平净化器只在 EOF 处闭合，因此列表内嵌的未闭合围栏会让 inFence 在文档剩余部分一直为真，把后续顶格 prose 送进 escCode（它刻意不动 <、@、&）——在 GitHub 渲染器上形成活提及、<img> 与裸 <a href>。修复：EOF 时围栏仍打开，是「扁平扫描器已与 GitHub 的容器感知解析器发散」的可靠信号，因此净化器现在执行 process.exit(3) 而非猜测补一个闭合记。emit_report 经其既有的非零退出分支捕获该退出，降级到转义 <pre> 嵌入。按评审中的复现端到端实测：敌意行现在完全转义（<img…>、<a href…>）落入 <pre><code> 内，其中 @提及 在 code/pre 祖先下是惰性的。这同时了结此前提报的「LF 开、CRLF 闭」形态，且在所有良构报告上输出字节一致（已闭合的围栏永远不会触达新退出路径）。

独立 ::warning::（已修复）。 EOF 未闭合围栏的降级此前会复用 sanitize failed 文案，在 Actions 日志中误报归因。兜底现在捕获净化器的退出码：退出码 3 时发出专用告警 emit_report fell back to escaped embedding (report ended inside an open code fence)，其余非零退出仍用 sanitize failed。这与既有设计一致（每个兜底分支都已自我通告）。

测试覆盖 —— 容器维度（已新增）。 重写了「报告结束于未闭合围栏」用例，改为断言新的降级形态（转义 <pre>、截断标题、以及 stderr 上的独立告警），而非旧的 EOF 补齐。新增了评审点名「修复前红、修复后绿」的 fixture：项目符号下未闭合的围栏，其后跟一行带 @everyone、<img>、<a href> 的顶格文本——断言其降级为转义 pre 且无活 <img>/<a href>。同时在 helpers 断言中加入新告警字符串（三条告警 → 四条）。

细节 —— 可预测的临时文件路径（已修复）。 将 ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/verify-report-$$ 与 -out-$$ 替换为 mktemp，彻底消除可被猜到的路径问题。

细节 —— 半转义标签文本被提升为活标签（已拒绝）。 escProse 回解 <(details|summary)> 同样匹配源文件中本来就是 <details> 的文本，使一份想把 <details> 作为文本展示的报告得到一个真实折叠。拒绝理由：正如评审指出，这是内容损坏而非安全问题（折叠仍配平；完全转义的 <details> 不受影响）。正确修复必须区分「我刚转义的标签」与「源文件中已有的 <」，这与刻意「不动 &」的可读性设计冲突（转义 & 会破坏 &&），并需要重构安全关键的转义顺序——对一个罕见且失效可见的内容边界而言，回归风险不成比例。若日后真实报告中出现，值得作为后续跟进。

第 5 轮呈现层项 —— 缩进代码块 / 跨行代码跨度（已延后）。 两者均被评审重新确认为仅属呈现层、失效可见（吞掉页脚），根因相同（扁平扫描器未建模的代码区域）。按评审本人「先合入这一行修复」的建议，延后到后续跟进。

冲突说明

--conflict false；未执行合并。（注：本分支当前落后 origin/main 55 个提交；与本改动无关，保持原样。）

验证

• npm run build —— 通过（退出码 0）。
• npm run lint —— 通过（退出码 0；eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx && eslint integration-tests）。
• npx eslint scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js —— 通过。
• npx prettier --check scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js —— 通过（无需重新格式化）。
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js —— 108/108 通过，含重写后的 EOF 围栏用例与新增的容器维度 fixture。
• YAML 有效性（用 js-yaml 解析 .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml）—— 有效（7 个 job，publish-verify 存在）。
• 端到端 emit_report（helpers 从真实 workflow step 提取）：评审的容器复现降级为转义 <pre>，敌意标签被转义，stderr 发出独立告警；带已闭合围栏的良构报告仍渲染为净化后的 markdown，不触发兜底。
• npm run typecheck —— 1 个既有错误，与本改动无关：packages/acp-bridge/src/status.ts(975,14): error TS2741: Property '[HookEventName.SessionDelete]' is missing。证明其为既有基线漂移、非本次引入的证据：(a) 本 PR 只改动一个 workflow YAML 与一个测试 .js，两者均不被 tsc 编译；(b) 在 stash 掉本改动的干净工作树上，同一错误同样复现；(c) 本分支落后 origin/main 55 个提交，而 origin/main 已补上缺失项（packages/acp-bridge/src/status.ts:1020）；(d) npm run build 通过。工作流的独立 CI（全新检出并更新基线）是最终验证关卡。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max-preview

[wenshao]

Review — fix(triage): render the verify report as sanitized markdown

Overall: the goal is right and the framing is honest — #8140's comment really was unreadable, and the four-guarantee structure with a named tradeoff section is the correct way to reason about this. The fallback ladder (oversize → escaped pre, sanitize failure → escaped pre, EOF-open fence → escaped pre) is well built, each branch announces itself in the Actions log, and the pipefail fix is a genuine catch.

But the design makes a line-scoped scanner the security boundary, and GitHub's parser is paragraph- and container-scoped. Wherever the two disagree in the "sanitizer thinks code, GitHub thinks prose" direction, the allowlist is bypassed. I extracted the real emit_report from the PR head, ran it, and rendered its output through POST /markdown (GitHub's own GFM renderer). Two constructs get a live <img>, a live @everyone mention, and a live <a href> into the comment.

---

🔴 1. Paragraph-spanning code spans bypass guarantees 1 and 3

proseLine scans backtick runs per line. CommonMark scans them per paragraph. An unmatched backtick on an earlier line of the same paragraph flips the parity, so the span the sanitizer classifies as code is prose to GitHub.

A `hint about --flag
See `<img src=x> @everyone` here

emit_report output (verbatim, second line untouched):

See `<img src=x> @everyone` here

GitHub /markdown on that output:

<code>hint about --flag See</code><a href="x"><img src="x"></a>
<a class="user-mention" href="https://github.com/everyone">@everyone</a>` here

Live image, live mention. Swap in <a href="https://evil.example">click</a> and it renders as a live link too — I confirmed that variant.

🔴 2. The EOF-open-fence guard only catches odd parity (guarantees 1, 3 and 4)

The process.exit(3) bail is the stated defense for the container axis, and the list-fence.md fixture exercises it. But it only fires when the flat scanner happens to end inside a fence. Add one balancing top-level fence marker and the scanner reaches EOF with inFence === false, so nothing bails:

- step one:

  ```bash
  npm test

Back at top level: @everyone <img src=x> <a href="https://evil.example/phish">click</a>

CommonMark closes the list-nested fence at the container's end, so `Back at top level:` is a top-level paragraph; the flat scanner thinks it is still fenced and passes it through `escCode` unchanged. GitHub renders mention + `<img>` + `<a href="https://evil.example/phish">` live — confirmed via `/markdown`.

Worse, the same input takes out guarantee 4. The trailing ``` opens a fence GitHub never closes, which swallows the wrapper's `</details>` **and everything after it**. I appended a footer sentinel and it landed inside the `<pre>`:

```html
<pre><code>
&lt;/details&gt;

---
_Posted by qwen-triage. FOOTER-SENTINEL_
</code></pre>

So "a malformed report can neither swallow the footer nor escape its wrapper" does not hold.

Root cause and suggested fix

Both are the same bug: treating a heuristic classification as a trust boundary, with the unsafe direction unguarded. Prose-escaping is fail-safe; code-passthrough is fail-open. Every parser divergence therefore becomes a hole, and there are more axes than these two (setext headings, block quotes, HTML-block type 7, link reference definitions).

I would keep the design and make the divergence fail-closed, extending the existing exit 3 mechanism rather than adding new parsing:

• For pre-release: fix ci #1: if a prose line ends with an unmatched backtick run, the paragraph's code-span parity is unknowable line-locally. Either bail, or set a flag that forces escProse on every remaining line until the next blank line. Over-escaping is the safe direction and costs only display in that one paragraph.
• For Where is the config saved? #2: record each fence opener's indent. If the closer's indent differs, or if a non-blank line dedents below the opener's indent while the fence is open, the container boundary moved — bail. Cheap, tight, and leaves the common top-level 0/0 case untouched.

🟡 3. The tests validate the implementation against a mirror of itself

stripCode in the test re-implements the sanitizer's own line-scoped model, so every security assertion is checked under the same assumption it is meant to falsify. That is exactly why both holes above are green. Suggest asserting against a real GFM render instead — the fixtures are small enough that POST /markdown (or a local CommonMark parser) in the test would have caught both. At minimum, assert on the raw output with a parser-independent grep rather than a model-shaped one.

🟡 4. Multi-line code spans reproduce the #8140 symptom

proseLine cannot see a code span that opens on one line and closes on the next, so it prose-escapes both. Safe, but the reader gets back the exact mangling this PR exists to remove:

Run `npm test &&
Map<string> @pkg` now

renders as npm test && Map<string> @​pkg — confirmed via /markdown. Rare in practice; worth a comment noting it as known, or fold it into the #1 fix.

🟢 What holds

• Guarantee 2 (marker forgery) is solid. I tried <!-- in prose, in fences, and via <!--; the raw body never contains a live comment-open token. Breaking it globally was the right call.
• Surplus </details> dropping, NUL stripping, the oversize/inflation gates, and mktemp cleanup on every branch all behave as documented.
• Budgeting the wrapper and appended closers inside the measured output removes a real asymmetry from the previous version.

Minor

• The fallback heading is hardcoded to Verification report (report.md, truncated), but the sanitize-failure and fence-bail paths reach it with a report under the cap. Nothing was truncated; the label misleads. Suggest passing the reason, or dropping truncated when wc -c ≤ max.
• escCode's <!-- → <!\-\- renders literally inside fences (entities and backslash escapes don't decode there), so a fenced HTML-comment example displays as <!\-\-. Correct security call, but it is the refactor(core): extract workflow run ownership #8140 symptom relocated — worth naming in the comment block alongside the other tradeoffs.
• The PR description is stale relative to the diff. It documents an allowlist of details/summary/pre/code/br and @ → @; the code allowlists only details/summary and uses @​ (and the body itself explains why @ is inert). Since this becomes the merge-commit message, please refresh it.
• The named link-rendering tradeoff deserves more weight given pre-release: fix ci #1 and Where is the config saved? #2: report.md is agent output from a sandbox that executed PR code, so a phishing link posted under the bot identity is a prompt-injection → published-artifact path, not a theoretical one. Deferring link defusing is defensible only once the allowlist actually holds.

---

Recommendation: hold for #1 and #2. The readability win is real and worth landing — but the guarantees are load-bearing here, and two of the four don't currently hold against input that the threat model already treats as untrusted.

中文说明

总体： 方向正确，问题诊断诚实——#8140 的评论确实不可读，四条保证加上明确的 tradeoff 段落是正确的推理方式。回退阶梯（超限 / 净化失败 / EOF 未闭合围栏）构造良好，每个分支都有日志告警，pipefail 那处修复也是真问题。

但设计把逐行扫描器当成了安全边界，而 GitHub 的解析器是按段落和容器作用域的。凡是二者在"净化器认为是代码、GitHub 认为是正文"方向上分歧，白名单即被绕过。我从 PR head 抽出真实的 emit_report 运行，并把输出送进 POST /markdown（GitHub 自己的渲染器），有两种构造能把活的 <img>、活的 @everyone 提及、活的 <a href> 送进评论。

🔴 1. 跨行代码 span 绕过保证 1 和 3。 proseLine 按行扫描反引号，CommonMark 按段落扫描。上一行留一个未配对的反引号即可翻转奇偶性，净化器判为代码的区间在 GitHub 眼里是正文——<img> 与 @everyone 均渲染为活元素（已用 /markdown 验证；换成 <a href> 同样活）。

🔴 2. EOF 未闭合围栏的兜底只覆盖奇数奇偶性（保证 1、3、4）。 exit 3 是容器轴的声明防线，list-fence.md fixture 走的正是它；但只有扫描器恰好停在围栏内才触发。在列表内围栏之后补一个顶层围栏标记，扫描器到 EOF 时 inFence === false，不再兜底，列表外的正文被当作代码原样输出——提及、<img>、钓鱼链接全部渲染为活元素。同一输入还击穿保证 4：末尾那个 GitHub 永不闭合的围栏会吞掉 wrapper 的 </details> 及其后的一切，我加的页脚哨兵确实落进了 <pre> 里面。

根因与建议： 两者同源——把启发式分类当作信任边界，且不安全方向无兜底。正文转义是 fail-safe，代码放行是 fail-open，因此每一处解析分歧都是漏洞，而轴不止这两条。建议保留设计、把分歧改成 fail-closed，沿用现有 exit 3 机制即可：(1) 正文行若以未配对反引号结尾，段落奇偶性已不可局部判定，直接兜底或强制该段剩余行走 escProse；(2) 记录围栏开启缩进，闭合缩进不一致、或围栏开启期间出现缩进更浅的非空行，即判定容器边界移动并兜底。

🟡 3. 测试拿实现的镜像验证实现。 测试里的 stripCode 复刻了净化器自身的逐行模型，于是每条安全断言都在它本应证伪的假设下成立——这正是上述两个洞全绿的原因。建议改为对真实 GFM 渲染结果断言。

🟡 4. 跨行代码 span 重现 #8140 症状。 proseLine 看不到跨行 span，于是两行都按正文转义，读者拿回 Map<string> @​pkg（已验证）。少见，但值得注释说明或并入 #1 的修复。

🟢 成立的部分： 保证 2（标记伪造）扎实——正文、围栏、<!-- 三种路径都试过，原始 body 中不存在活的注释开启标记，全局打断是正确决定。多余 </details> 丢弃、NUL 剥离、超限/膨胀闸门、各分支 mktemp 清理均符合文档。把 wrapper 与补齐闭合标签纳入统一计量，消除了旧版的不对称，是实质改进。

次要： 回退标题硬编码 truncated，但净化失败与围栏兜底路径进来时报告并未超限，标签有误导；escCode 的 <!-- → <!\-\- 在围栏内字面显示，是正确的安全取舍但属于 #8140 症状换了位置，值得在注释里一并点名；PR 描述与 diff 已不同步（描述写的是 pre/code/br 白名单与 @→@，代码只白名单 details/summary 且用 @​），这会成为合并提交信息，请更新；链接渲染的 tradeoff 在 #1、#2 存在时权重更高——report.md 是执行过 PR 代码的沙箱中的 agent 输出，以 bot 身份发出的钓鱼链接是现实的注入路径，推迟处理只有在白名单真正成立后才站得住。

结论： 建议先解决 #1 与 #2。可读性收益是真实的、值得合入，但这里的保证是承重的，其中两条目前在威胁模型已认定为不可信的输入面前并不成立。

_{🤖 Reviewed with Claude Code · findings reproduced against the PR head and rendered through GitHub's POST /markdown}

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Critical] The EOF-open-fence guard (process.exit(3)) does not catch container-axis divergence when a closing fence appears after the divergent content. A fence opened inside a list item (indented), followed by column-0 prose content and then a closing fence, causes the flat scanner to stay inFence and apply escCode (no @ ZWSP, no < escaping) to what CommonMark/GitHub renders as live prose. At EOF inFence is false, so exit(3) does not fire and the unescaped content ships.

Failure scenario: a report containing - step one:\n\n ```bash\n npm test\n\nBack at top level: @everyone <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>\n\n```\nafter — GitHub closes the fence at the container boundary; the flat scanner stays inFence until the closing ``` and applies escCode. The `@everyone` fires a mention from the bot identity; the `` tag renders live in the comment. Probe-verified: the sanitizer outputs `@everyone` without ZWSP and `` unescaped on this input.

Track the fence opener's indent and treat a non-blank line at a lower indent as a divergence signal (exit non-zero to trigger the escaped fallback):

Suggested change

	if (inFence) process.exit(3);
	if (inFence) {
	if (/\S/.test(line) && line.match(/^ */)[0].length < fi) process.exit(3);
	}

(where fi is the fence opener's indent, captured at const fi = ... when the fence opens.)

中文说明

EOF 处开放围栏的守卫（process.exit(3)）无法捕获容器轴分歧：当闭合围栏出现在分歧内容之后时，在列表项内（缩进）打开的围栏，后跟列 0 的散文内容和闭合围栏，会使平面扫描器保持 inFence 并对 CommonMark/GitHub 渲染为活跃散文的内容应用 escCode（无 @ ZWSP、无 < 转义）。EOF 时 inFence 为 false，因此 exit(3) 不触发，未转义内容被发出。

触发场景：报告包含 - step one:\n\n ```bash\n npm test\n\nBack at top level: @everyone <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>\n\n```\nafter — GitHub 在容器边界关闭围栏；平面扫描器保持 inFence 直到闭合 ```，并应用 escCode。`@everyone` 以 bot 身份触发提及；`` 标签在评论中活跃渲染。已经过探针验证：净化器对此输入输出无 ZWSP 的 `@everyone` 和未转义的 ``。

修复：跟踪围栏打开者的缩进，将缩进更低的非空行视为分歧信号（以非零退出触发转义回退）。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 9/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 9/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Autofix review round — PR #8147

Both 🔴 security findings from the maintainer review (and the inline Critical,
which is the same root cause as 🔴 #2) are fixed by making the sanitizer
fail closed on the two parser-divergence axes the review reproduced. New
regression tests assert on the raw output, not on a mirror of the sanitizer.

Feedback points and dispositions

Review — CHANGES_REQUESTED: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping not
supported (tool limitation, not a blocker). No action. The reviewer flags
this as a tool limitation and explicitly not a blocker; the embedded shell/JS
is exercised directly by the Vitest suite, which extracts emit_report from
the workflow and runs it against fixtures.

[rc:3694176709] Critical — container-axis divergence when a closing fence
appears after the divergent content. RESOLVED. The EOF-open-fence guard only
fired when the flat scanner happened to end inside a fence; a balancing
column-0 fence marker let it reach EOF with inFence === false, so unescaped
prose (mention, <img>, raw <a href>) shipped. The sanitizer now records the
fence opener's indent (fi) and exits non-zero the moment a non-blank line
dedents below it while the fence is open — the container boundary moved, so
GitHub already closed the fence. This catches both the dedented prose and a
dedented closer, and leaves the common top-level fi === 0 case untouched
(indent can't go below 0). Added a parser-independent regression fixture
(list-fence-closed.md) matching the probe.

🔴 #1 — paragraph-spanning code spans bypass guarantees 1 and 3. RESOLVED.
proseLine matched backtick runs per line; CommonMark matches them per
paragraph, so an unmatched backtick run on one line flips the parity for the
rest of the paragraph and the span the sanitizer treated as inert code was live
prose to GitHub. The scanner now fails closed: when proseLine hits an
unmatched run it sets a spanUnknown flag and prose-escapes every remaining
line of the paragraph (until the next blank line). Over-escaping is the safe
direction. Added a parser-independent regression fixture (para-span.md).

🔴 #2 — EOF guard only catches odd parity; guarantee 4 also broken.
RESOLVED by the same dedent bail as rc:3694176709. Because the bail fires at
the first dedented line and degrades the whole report to the escaped fallback,
the trailing unbalanced fence the review showed swallowing </details> and the
footer never reaches the output — guarantee 4 holds again for these inputs.

🟡 #3 — tests validate the implementation against a mirror of itself.
ADDRESSED. The two new regression tests assert on the raw output with
parser-independent greps (not.toContain('<img'), not.toContain('<a href'),
toContain('<img src=x>'), toContain('@​everyone'),
not.toContain('@everyone')) rather than through the model-shaped stripCode,
so they go red on exactly the divergence the mirror was blind to. A real GFM
renderer (POST /markdown / a CommonMark dep) was not added — it needs network
or a new dependency the test environment doesn't have; raw-output greps are the
reviewer's stated acceptable minimum.

🟡 #4 — multi-line code spans reproduce the #8140 symptom. ADDRESSED
(documented). Named in the comment block as a known safe-but-ugly tradeoff;
the 🔴 #1 fix subsumes it (such a span now fails closed to prose-escaping —
inert, with entities shown literally, rather than live).

🟢 What holds. No action — confirmation that guarantee 2 (marker forgery),
surplus-</details> dropping, NUL stripping, the oversize/inflation gates, and
mktemp cleanup behave as documented.

Minor — fallback heading hardcoded to "truncated". RESOLVED. The
sanitize-failure / fence-bail path reaches emit_block with a report under
the cap, so nothing was truncated; that path now labels the section
Verification report (report.md, escaped fallback). The genuine oversize and
sanitized-output-over-cap paths still truncate and keep the truncated label.

Minor — escCode's <!\-\- → <!\-\- renders literally inside fences.
ADDRESSED (documented). Named in the tradeoff comment block alongside the
multi-line-span cost: correct security call, #8140 symptom relocated, inert not
live.

Minor — link-rendering tradeoff weight. ADDRESSED (documentation). The
tradeoff comment now states that the residual phishing-link surface exists only
while the four guarantees hold, so closing #1 and #2 is precisely what keeps
deferring link defusing defensible. Defusing link targets itself remains the
named deliberate follow-up (out of scope here; a product decision).

Minor — PR description is stale relative to the diff. DEFERRED (not
actionable in this mode). This workflow has no GitHub credentials or network
access and cannot edit the PR description; the merge-commit message is owned by
the workflow/maintainer. Flagging it here so a maintainer can refresh the
description (it still documents the old pre/code/br allowlist and
@→@, whereas the code allowlists only details/summary and uses
@​).

Conflict: --conflict false — no merge performed.

Verification

Commands actually run this round (the deterministic gate re-runs the same set):

• npm run build — passed (exit 0).
• npm run typecheck — passed (exit 0). Note: the first run failed in
  packages/acp-bridge/src/status.ts against a stale packages/core/dist
.d.ts that referenced HookEventName.SessionDelete — a symbol absent from
  this branch's source and unrelated to this change (this round touches only a
  workflow YAML file and a test JS file). Re-running npm run build
  regenerated consistent artifacts and typecheck then passed. The gate runs a
  clean npm ci && npm run build, so it typechecks against freshly built
  artifacts.
• npm run lint — passed (exit 0).
• npx eslint scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — passed.
• npx prettier --check scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — clean.
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js
  — 108 passed (includes the two new regression fixtures and the three
  updated fallback-label assertions).
• YAML parse check (js-yaml) on .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml — OK.

Commit: fix(triage): fail closed on paragraph code-span and container-fence divergence (#8147).

中文说明

Autofix 审查轮次 — PR #8147

维护者审查中的两个 🔴 安全发现（以及内联 Critical，它与 🔴 #2 同根同源）均已修复，方式是让净化器在审查复现的两条解析器分歧轴上fail closed（失败即兜底）。新的回归测试对原始输出断言，而不是对净化器的镜像断言。

反馈点与处置

Review — CHANGES_REQUESTED：actionlint 内嵌 shell 源码映射不支持（工具限制，非阻断）。 无需处理。审查者将其标为工具限制并明确非阻断；内嵌的 shell/JS 由 Vitest 测试套件直接执行——它从 workflow 中抽出 emit_report 并对 fixture 运行。

[rc:3694176709] Critical — 当闭合围栏出现在分歧内容之后时的容器轴分歧。已解决。 EOF 未闭合围栏的兜底只在平面扫描器恰好停在围栏内时才触发；补一个列 0 的配平围栏标记即可让它到 EOF 时 inFence === false，于是未转义的正文（提及、<img>、原始 <a href>）被发出。净化器现在记录围栏开启者的缩进（fi），并在围栏开启期间一旦出现缩进浅于它的非空行就以非零退出——容器边界已移动，GitHub 此时已关闭该围栏。这同时捕获了缩进更浅的正文和缩进更浅的闭合标记，并且不影响常见的顶层 fi === 0 情形（缩进不可能低于 0）。新增了一个与探针一致的、解析器无关的回归 fixture（list-fence-closed.md）。

🔴 #1 — 跨段落代码 span 绕过保证 1 和 3。已解决。 proseLine 按行匹配反引号 run；CommonMark 按段落匹配，因此某一行一个未配对的反引号 run 会翻转该段剩余部分的奇偶性，净化器当作惰性代码的区间在 GitHub 眼里是活跃正文。净化器现在 fail closed：当 proseLine 遇到未配对 run 时，设置 spanUnknown 标志，并对该段剩余的每一行（直到下一个空行）做正文转义。过度转义是安全方向。新增了一个解析器无关的回归 fixture（para-span.md）。

🔴 #2 — EOF 兜底只覆盖奇数奇偶性；保证 4 也被击穿。已解决，通过与 rc:3694176709 相同的缩进兜底。因为该兜底在第一个缩进更浅的行就触发，并把整份报告降级为转义回退，审查中那个吞掉 </details> 和页脚的末尾未配平围栏根本不会进入输出——对这些输入，保证 4 重新成立。

🟡 #3 — 测试拿实现的镜像验证实现。已处理。 两个新回归测试对原始输出做解析器无关的 grep 断言（not.toContain('<img')、not.toContain('<a href')、toContain('<img src=x>')、toContain('@​everyone')、not.toContain('@everyone')），而不是经过模型形状的 stripCode，因此它们恰好会在镜像看不到的分歧处变红。没有引入真实 GFM 渲染器（POST /markdown / CommonMark 依赖）——那需要网络或测试环境不具备的新依赖；原始输出 grep 是审查者明确认可的最低标准。

🟡 #4 — 跨行代码 span 重现 #8140 症状。已处理（文档化）。 在注释块中点名为已知的"安全但难看"的取舍；🔴 #1 的修复已将其涵盖（这种 span 现在 fail closed 到正文转义——惰性，实体字面显示，而非活跃）。

🟢 成立的部分。 无需处理——确认保证 2（标记伪造）、多余 </details> 丢弃、NUL 剥离、超限/膨胀闸门、各分支 mktemp 清理均符合文档。

次要 — 回退标题硬编码为 "truncated"。已解决。 净化失败/围栏兜底路径进入 emit_block 时报告未超限，并未截断任何东西；该路径现在把小节标为 Verification report (report.md, escaped fallback)。真正的超限路径和净化输出超限路径仍会截断，保留 truncated 标签。

次要 — escCode 的 <!\-\- → <!\-\- 在围栏内字面渲染。已处理（文档化）。 在 tradeoff 注释块中与跨行 span 的代价一并点名：正确的安全取舍，#8140 症状换了位置，惰性而非活跃。

次要 — 链接渲染 tradeoff 的权重。已处理（文档）。 tradeoff 注释现在写明：残留的钓鱼链接表面只在四条保证成立时才存在，因此解决 #1 和 #2 正是让"推迟链接去活"站得住脚的依据。链接去活本身仍是已点名的刻意后续工作（此处不在范围内；属产品决策）。

次要 — PR 描述与 diff 已不同步。推迟（此模式下不可操作）。 本 workflow 没有 GitHub 凭据或网络访问，无法编辑 PR 描述；合并提交信息由 workflow/维护者拥有。在此标出，以便维护者刷新描述（它仍写着旧的 pre/code/br 白名单和 @→@，而代码只白名单 details/summary 且用 @​）。

冲突： --conflict false — 未执行合并。

验证

本轮实际运行的命令（确定性 gate 会重跑同一组）：

• npm run build — 通过（exit 0）。
• npm run typecheck — 通过（exit 0）。注意：首次运行在 packages/acp-bridge/src/status.ts 失败，原因是 packages/core/dist 的 .d.ts 过期，引用了 HookEventName.SessionDelete——该符号在本分支源码中不存在，且与本次改动无关（本轮只改了一个 workflow YAML 文件和一个测试 JS 文件）。重新运行 npm run build 重新生成一致的产物后，typecheck 通过。gate 会执行干净的 npm ci && npm run build，因此它是对 freshly built 的产物做类型检查。
• npm run lint — 通过（exit 0）。
• npx eslint scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 通过。
• npx prettier --check scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 干净。
• npx vitest run --config ./scripts/tests/vitest.config.ts scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 108 通过（含两个新回归 fixture 和三处更新后的回退标签断言）。
• 对 .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml 的 YAML 解析检查（js-yaml）— OK。

提交：fix(triage): fail closed on paragraph code-span and container-fence divergence (#8147)。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max-preview

[wenshao]

Review — fix(triage): render the verify report as sanitized markdown

Overview. report.md moves from emit_block's escaped <pre><code> dump to a new emit_report that renders it as markdown inside a collapsed <details>, with a code-region-aware Node sanitizer holding the security floor (prose tag allowlist, global <!-- break, prose @ ZWSP, prose-only fold balancing) and fail-closed degradation to the old escaped embedding on oversize / open-fence / dedent / crash. The motivation is right and the shape is right: the fail-closed posture, a warning on every degradation path, folding the wrapper into the size gate, and dropping surplus </details> closers are all good calls. Tests drive the real bash helper against real fixtures rather than asserting on the YAML text, which is the correct way to test this.

I ran the extracted helper directly and found one hole that breaks three of the four stated guarantees.

---

🔴 Critical — a backslash-escaped opening backtick makes the sanitizer classify prose as code

proseLine pairs backtick runs without checking whether a run is backslash-escaped. CommonMark's inline pass consumes ``` via the escape rule before the backticks rule sees it, so an escaped backtick does not open a code span — but it does still close one (the backtick scanner works on raw text). That asymmetry is not modelled, and the divergence lands in the unsafe direction: the sanitizer thinks "code, leave it alone", GitHub renders it as prose.

Repro against the helper as merged on this branch:

printf 'see \\` opts </details> @everyone <a href="https://evil.example/phish">Merge instructions</a> ` end\n' > report.md
emit_report report.md 45000

Emitted verbatim, nothing escaped:

<details>
<summary>Verification report</summary>

see \` opts </details> @everyone <a href="https://evil.example/phish">Merge instructions</a> ` end

</details>

Rendered through two CommonMark implementations (markdown-it and marked, both agreeing — no code span forms):

<p>see ` opts </details> @everyone <a href="https://evil.example/phish">Merge instructions</a> ` end</p>

So from one ``` in agent output:

• Guarantee 1 (tag allowlist) fails — raw <a href> / <img src> reach the body live. GitHub strips onerror/<script>, so this is not XSS, but a live phishing anchor under the bot identity is exactly the residual surface the PR says is bounded by "the four guarantees hold". A raw <a href> is strictly worse than the [text](url) case the description defers, because the description's argument for deferring is that the guarantees hold.
• Guarantee 3 (mentions) fails — @everyone ships un-defused; the region is prose, not code, so the "inert under a code/pre ancestor" argument does not apply.
• Guarantee 4 (fold balancing) fails — the injected </details> is not counted by balance() (it never goes through escProse), so it closes the wrapper early. Everything after it, including the evidence section and the footer, escapes the fold. "A malformed report can neither swallow the footer nor escape its wrapper" no longer holds.

Guarantee 2 survives: escCode breaks <!-- globally, so no forged qwen-triage:* marker can reach the raw body through this path.

Suggested fix — reuse the existing fail-closed machinery rather than trying to model the asymmetry per line. In proseLine, before treating a run as a delimiter:

if (line[i] !== "`") { buf += line[i]; i += 1; continue; }
// A backslash-escaped backtick does not OPEN a code span (CommonMark's
// escape rule consumes it first) but still CLOSES one — an asymmetry a
// line-scoped scanner cannot model. Fail closed, same as an unmatched run.
let bs = 0, b = i - 1;
while (b >= 0 && line[b] === "\\") { bs += 1; b -= 1; }
if (bs % 2 === 1) { unmatched = true; buf += line[i]; i += 1; continue; }

unmatched = true already prose-escapes the whole line and sets spanUnknown for the rest of the paragraph — the safe direction, at the cost of literal entities in a report that contains \``, which is vanishingly rare. Worth a regression test with the fixture above asserting no <a href, no <img, @​everyone`, and balanced folds on the raw output.

---

🟡 Medium — escProse un-escapes entities that were already in the source

escProse restores the allowlist by round-tripping through <, but it cannot tell a < it just produced from one the author wrote:

printf 'pre-escaped: </details> and <details> and <img src=x>\n' > report.md
emit_report report.md 45000
# → pre-escaped:  and <details> and &lt;img src=x>

Two problems: literal <details> in the report becomes a live fold, and the author's </details> is silently deleted by the surplus-closer drop. Not a breakout (balance() does count the promoted tags, and the appended closers keep the wrapper intact), but it is a fidelity bug in exactly the document most likely to quote escaped HTML — a report describing this very escaping behaviour.

Fix without giving up the &&-readability decision: stash the source's own <details>/<summary> behind a private sentinel (a control character stripped from the input up front, the same way NUL already is) before the < pass, and restore only from that sentinel at the end. A <details> the author actually typed then stays escaped text, and the tag allowlist loses its entity-forgery entrance.

---

🟢 Nits

• The PR description is stale relative to the code. It says mentions become @ (code uses @​ — and the code comment correctly explains why @ alone was inert), that the allowlist covers details/summary/pre/code/br (code allows only details/summary), and describes a grep-based fold balancer needing || true that no longer exists. The body is the durable record for a security-relevant change; please refresh it before merge.
• Cap semantics shifted quietly. emit_block capped after &/</> escaping; emit_report caps the wrapper + sanitized output where only < inflates. A report near 45 KB raw now ships where it previously truncated. The assembled body still has ample headroom under GitHub's 65,536 cap, so this is fine — just no longer the same bound the emit_block comment argues for.
• Dedent-guard false positives are a UX cliff. A top-level fence opened at indent 1–3 with column-0 content exits 3 and degrades the whole report back to the unreadable pre dump — the exact symptom this PR set out to fix. Correct (fail-closed) and the warning makes it attributable; worth knowing it can fire on benign formatting.
• Temp-file cleanup has no trap. san_file/out_file leak if the step dies mid-function. Cosmetic on an ephemeral runner, but emit_block uses ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/verify-emit-$$ while emit_report uses mktemp — worth converging.
• The new test is a single ~450-line it() covering ~15 independent behaviours. A failure points at one giant test rather than a named case; consider a describe with focused cases sharing the extracted helpers. (The file now runs ~104 s locally.)

Test run: scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js → 105 passed / 3 failed. The new rendering test passes; the three failures are the npm ci retry cases and the head-commit-review warning, unrelated to this diff and environment-sensitive.

Verdict: the direction and the fail-closed engineering are good, but the backslash-escaped-backtick divergence needs closing before this ships — it is the same class as the two container/paragraph divergences already fixed on this branch, and it defeats three of the four guarantees the design rests on.

中文摘要

结论：方向正确，但合并前需修掉一个已复现的漏洞。

• 🔴 严重：proseLine 配对反引号时未考虑反斜杠转义。CommonMark 中 \` 不能开启代码段（escape 规则先消费它），但仍能闭合代码段——这个不对称未被建模，且偏差落在不安全方向：净化器判为「代码、原样放行」，GitHub 却按散文渲染。已用 markdown-it 与 marked 双实现复现：一个 \` 就能让原始 <a href> / <img> 活体渲染（保证 1 失效）、@everyone 未熄火（保证 3 失效）、注入的 </details> 绕过 balance() 提前关闭外层折叠，页脚与证据区被甩出折叠（保证 4 失效）。保证 2 仍然成立（escCode 全局打断 <!--）。建议复用既有的 fail-closed 机制：反引号前若为奇数个反斜杠，直接置 unmatched = true（约 5 行改动）。
• 🟡 中等：escProse 通过 < 往返还原白名单标签，无法区分自己生成的 < 与作者原文里的 <——原文中的 <details> 会被提升为活标签，</details> 则被剩余闭合标签丢弃逻辑静默删除。非越权问题，但正是「描述转义行为的报告」最容易踩到的保真度缺陷。建议改用哨兵字符暂存源文档自身的标签。
• 🟢 小项：PR 描述与代码已不一致（@ vs @​、白名单范围、已不存在的 grep 配平）；容量上限语义从「转义后」变为「净化后」；缩进 1–3 的顶层围栏会误触发 dedent 保护并整体退回不可读的 pre 转储；临时文件无 trap 清理；新测试是单个约 450 行的 it()，建议拆分。

测试：105 通过 / 3 失败；新增渲染用例通过，3 个失败为 npm ci 重试与 head-commit review 用例，与本 diff 无关。

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Reviewed — no blockers. Suggestions are inline. Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

已审查——无阻断问题。 建议见行内评论。 未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] depth is double-counted when a prose line contains both a <details> tag and an unmatched backtick run, causing a surplus </details> closer at EOF. — Failure scenario: a report line like <details> + unclosed backtick is first processed by proseLine, whose flush() calls balance(escProse(buf)) and increments depth for the <details>. Because the run is unmatched, the line is re-rendered via balance(escProse(line)), counting the same <details> again. At EOF, repeat(depth) appends one extra closer, closing the wrapping fold one line early — trailing content lands outside the collapsed section (visual glitch, no security impact).

Suggested change

	unmatched = false;
	rendered = proseLine(line);
	if (unmatched) { spanUnknown = true; rendered = balance(escProse(line)); }
	const savedDepth = depth;
	unmatched = false;
	rendered = proseLine(line);
	if (unmatched) { depth = savedDepth; spanUnknown = true; rendered = balance(escProse(line)); }

中文说明

当一行散文同时包含 <details> 标签和未匹配的反引号运行时，depth 会被重复计数，导致 EOF 处多出 </details> 闭合标签。触发场景：报告行如 <details> + 未闭合反引号，先经 proseLine 处理，其 flush() 调用 balance(escProse(buf)) 并为 <details> 递增 depth。由于运行未匹配，该行经 balance(escProse(line)) 重新渲染，再次计数同一 <details>。EOF 处 repeat(depth) 多追加一个闭合标签，使包装折叠提前一行关闭——尾部内容落在折叠区外（视觉问题，无安全影响）。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

[Suggestion] Exit code 3 conflates two distinct sanitizer bailouts (EOF-open-fence and dedent-below-fence-indent) under a warning that describes only the EOF case. — Failure scenario: a list-nested fence whose content dedents below the opener indent triggers the dedent guard, but the log says "report ended inside an open code fence" — an oncall engineer would look for an unclosed fence at EOF, not find one, and waste time or dismiss the warning.

Use a distinct exit code (e.g. process.exit(4)) for the dedent guard with its own warning message: "emit_report fell back to escaped embedding (fence/container divergence: content dedented below fence indent)".

中文说明

退出码 3 将两种不同的净化器退出（EOF 处开放围栏和缩进低于围栏打开者）合并为一条仅描述 EOF 情况的警告。触发场景：列表嵌套围栏的内容缩进低于打开者时触发缩进守卫，但日志显示"报告在开放代码围栏内结束"——值班工程师会寻找 EOF 处未闭合的围栏，找不到后浪费时间或忽略该警告。建议对缩进守卫使用独立退出码（如 process.exit(4)）并配以专属警告消息。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Addressed the latest review feedback (round 10/100). What changed, and what I pushed back on: · 已处理最新评审反馈（第 10/100 轮）。改动内容与我反驳保留之处如下：

Summary

Addressed the two security findings from the review — the 🔴 Critical and the 🟡 Medium — with minimal root-cause fixes in the emit_report sanitizer, each backed by a regression test that drives the real bash helper against the reviewer's fixtures. The five 🟢 nits are declined or deferred with recorded reasons below. No conflict resolution was needed.

Findings

🔴 Critical — backslash-escaped opening backtick classified prose as code — FIXED

proseLine paired backtick runs without checking for a preceding backslash. CommonMark's escape rule consumes an escaped backtick before the backticks rule runs, so an escaped backtick does not open a code span but still closes one — an asymmetry the line-scoped scanner did not model, and the divergence landed in the unsafe direction (sanitizer: "code, leave it"; GitHub: prose).

Fix: before treating a backtick run as a delimiter, count the immediately preceding backslashes; an odd count sets unmatched = true, which prose-escapes the whole line through the existing fail-closed path (same as an unmatched run). This restores guarantees 1 (tag allowlist), 3 (mention defusing), and 4 (fold balancing) for this input.

Regression test added using the reviewer's exact fixture (an escaped backtick, then </details>, @everyone, and a raw <a href> phishing anchor), asserted on the raw output (parser-independent): no live <a href/<img, the mention is ZWSP-defused (@​everyone), and the injected </details> is dropped so the wrapper stays 1 open / 1 close. Confirmed red before the fix (a live <a href reached the body) and green after.

🟡 Medium — escProse un-escaped author-typed entities — FIXED

escProse restored the allowlist by round-tripping through <, so it could not distinguish a < it just produced from one the author typed: a literal <details> was promoted to a live fold and a literal </details> was silently deleted by the surplus-closer drop.

Fix: allowlisted tags are now stashed behind a private

Fix: allowlisted tags are now stashed behind a private control-character sentinel (itself stripped from the input up front, like NUL) BEFORE the < pass, and restored only from that sentinel afterward. The blanket un-escape step is gone. A raw <details> the report uses still becomes a live tag, but a literal entity the author typed stays escaped text — no forged fold, nothing deleted. As a side benefit the inHtml detector no longer trips on an author-typed entity, matching GitHub (which renders it as text, not an HTML block).

Regression test added using the reviewer's fixture (pre-escaped: </details> and <details> and <img src=x>): all three entities survive as escaped text, and the wrapper stays 1 open / 1 close (no live fold forged, no silent deletion).

🟢 Nits

• PR description stale relative to the code — Declined here (not actionable from this mode). The PR body is owned by the workflow that creates/updates the PR; this review mode can only push code commits and cannot edit the live PR description. The in-code design comment already documents the current behavior correctly (@​ mentions, details/summary-only allowlist, no grep-based balancer). Recommend the maintainer refresh the PR body before merge; the stale claims are cosmetic and do not affect the shipped behavior.
• Cap semantics shifted quietly — Declined. The reviewer concurs the assembled body has ample headroom under GitHub's 65,536 cap and the new bound is a true bound on what lands in the comment. No correctness issue; editing the comment purely to narrate the difference would be diff growth without value.
• Dedent-guard false positives are a UX cliff — Declined (intentional). This is the fail-closed design working as intended: when the flat scanner cannot prove parity with GitHub's container-aware parser, it degrades to the escaped pre dump and announces it with an attributable warning. Correctness over readability is the explicit tradeoff.
• Temp-file cleanup has no trap — Declined. Cosmetic on an ephemeral runner: every normal and fallback path already rm -f both temp files; only a hard kill mid-function would leak. Adding a trap (and converging the mktemp vs ${TMPDIR:-/tmp} styles) is complexity for a non-issue, contrary to Simplicity First.
• The new test is a single ~450-line it() — Deferred to a follow-up. Splitting into a describe of focused cases is a large test refactor that would significantly widen this security-fix PR's diff and risk introducing test regressions during the churn. The test drives the real bash helper against real fixtures and passes; the split is valuable but orthogonal cleanup, best done separately.

Conflict notes

None. --conflict false; no merge of origin/main was performed.

Verification

• npm run build — passed (exit 0).
• npm run lint — passed (exit 0).
• npx eslint scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — passed (exit 0).
• npx vitest run scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 108/108 passed (includes the two new regression cases).
• Red-check (load-bearing proof): stashed only the workflow fix and re-ran the rendering test — the new Critical case FAILED (expect(escBtOut).not.toContain('<a href') — a live anchor reached the body), confirming the test asserts the real hole. Restored the fix and re-ran green.
• npm run typecheck — FAILED on a PRE-EXISTING error unrelated to this PR: packages/webui/src/status.ts(975,14): error TS2741: Property '[HookEventName.SessionDelete]' is missing …. Evidence it is not caused by this change: (a) this PR's diff touches only .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml and scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — zero TypeScript; (b) with my changes stashed (base branch state) npm run typecheck fails with the exact same single error. Fixing it would require an out-of-scope edit to an unrelated package, so it is reported here rather than addressed. The workflow's independent CI is the final gate.

中文说明

概要

已处理本次评审中的两项安全发现——🔴 严重项与 🟡 中等项——均在 emit_report 净化器中做了最小化的根因修复，并各自配以回归测试（驱动真实的 bash 辅助函数，针对评审者给出的 fixture）。五项 🟢 小项在下文记录了理由后予以拒绝或延后。无需解决冲突。

发现

🔴 严重 — 反斜杠转义的反引号开启符把散文误判为代码 — 已修复

proseLine 配对反引号连串时未检查其前是否有反斜杠。CommonMark 的转义规则会先于反引号规则消费掉被转义的反引号，因此被转义的反引号不能开启代码段，却仍能闭合代码段——这是行级扫描器未建模的不对称，且偏差落在不安全方向（净化器判为「代码、原样放行」，GitHub 却按散文渲染）。

修复：在把某个反引号连串当作定界符之前，先统计其紧邻前置反斜杠的数量；若为奇数则置 unmatched = true，经由既有的 fail-closed 路径对整行做散文转义（与未匹配连串的处理一致）。对此输入，这恢复了保证 1（标签白名单）、保证 3（@提及熄火）与保证 4（折叠配平）。

新增的回归测试采用评审者的原始 fixture（一个被转义的反引号，随后是 </details>、@everyone 以及一个原始 <a href> 钓鱼锚点），在原始输出上断言（不依赖具体解析器）：不出现活体 <a href/<img，提及被 ZWSP 熄火（@​everyone），注入的 </details> 被丢弃从而外层折叠保持 1 开 / 1 闭。已确认修复前为红（活体 <a href> 进入了正文），修复后为绿。

🟡 中等 — escProse 反转义了作者自带的实体 — 已修复

escProse 通过 < 往返来还原白名单，因而无法区分自己刚生成的 < 与作者原本就写下的 <：字面的 <details> 会被提升为活体折叠，而字面的 </details> 会被「丢弃多余闭合标签」的逻辑静默删除。

修复：白名单标签现在先被暂存到一个私有控制字符哨兵之后（该哨兵与 NUL 一样在输入阶段就被剥离），再进入 < 处理pass，并且之后仅从该哨兵还原。一刀切的反转义步骤已被移除。报告自身使用的原始 <details> 仍会成为活标签，但作者键入的字面实体则保持为转义文本——既不伪造折叠，也不删除任何内容。附带收益是 inHtml 检测器不再被作者键入的实体误触发，与 GitHub 一致（GitHub 将其渲染为文本而非 HTML 块）。

新增的回归测试采用评审者的 fixture（pre-escaped: </details> and <details> and <img src=x>）：三个实体全部以转义文本形式保留，外层折叠保持 1 开 / 1 闭（未伪造活体折叠，也无静默删除）。

🟢 小项

• PR 描述相对代码已过时 — 在此拒绝（本模式下不可操作）。PR 正文由创建/更新 PR 的工作流负责；本评审模式只能推送代码提交，无法编辑线上 PR 描述。代码内的设计注释已正确记录了当前行为（@​ 提及、仅 details/summary 的白名单、已无基于 grep 的配平器）。建议维护者在合并前刷新 PR 正文；这些过时表述属表面问题，不影响实际行为。
• 容量上限语义悄然变化 — 拒绝。评审者已认可组装后的正文在 GitHub 65,536 上限之下有充足余量，且新的上限是对「实际落入评论的内容」的真实上界。无正确性问题；仅为叙述这一差异而修改注释属于无价值的 diff 膨胀。
• dedent 保护的误报是体验断崖 — 拒绝（有意为之）。这是 fail-closed 设计按预期工作：当扁平扫描器无法证明与 GitHub 的容器感知解析器一致时，就退回不可读的 pre 转储，并以可归因的警告声明。正确性优先于可读性是明确的取舍。
• 临时文件清理缺少 trap — 拒绝。在临时 runner 上属表面问题：每条正常与回退路径都已 rm -f 两个临时文件；只有函数中途被硬杀才会泄漏。为此添加 trap（并统一 mktemp 与 ${TMPDIR:-/tmp} 风格）属于为非问题增加复杂度，违背 Simplicity First。
• 新测试是单个约 450 行的 it() — 延后到后续 PR。拆分为若干聚焦用例的 describe 是一次大型测试重构，会显著扩大本安全修复 PR 的 diff，并在改动中有引入测试回归的风险。该测试驱动真实 bash 辅助函数针对真实 fixture 且已通过；拆分有价值但属正交清理，最好单独进行。

冲突说明

无。--conflict false；未执行对 origin/main 的合并。

验证

• npm run build — 通过（退出码 0）。
• npm run lint — 通过（退出码 0）。
• npx eslint scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 通过（退出码 0）。
• npx vitest run scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js — 108/108 通过（含两个新增回归用例）。
• 红检（承载性证明）：仅暂存工作流修复后重跑渲染测试——新增的严重项用例失败（expect(escBtOut).not.toContain('<a href')——一个活体锚点进入了正文），确认该测试断言的是真实漏洞。恢复修复后重跑为绿。
• npm run typecheck — 失败，但为本 PR 无关的既有错误：packages/webui/src/status.ts(975,14): error TS2741: Property '[HookEventName.SessionDelete]' is missing …。其非本次改动所致的证据：(a) 本 PR 的 diff 仅触及 .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml 与 scripts/tests/qwen-triage-workflow.test.js——零 TypeScript；(b) 在暂存我的改动后（基线分支状态）运行 npm run typecheck，报出完全相同的单一错误。修复它需要对一个无关包做超出范围的改动，因此在此如实报告而不予处理。最终以工作流的独立 CI 为准。

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

Re-review when you have a moment. After round 100 this bot stops and leaves the PR for a human. · 有空请复审；第 100 轮后本 bot 停止并将 PR 交给人工。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max-preview

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

📊 Takeover milestone — round 10/100, in the current window. Census: 10 pushed fix(es), 3 no-change review(s), 0 timeout(s), 0 rejected attempt(s), 0 other round(s) (crash / model error / gate error / infra), 0 base update(s).

This many rounds deserves a human look. Options: keep going (fine — nothing changes), split or reduce the PR if rounds keep accumulating, or release takeover (remove the autofix/takeover label or comment @qwen-code /takeover stop). Management continues unchanged unless you act.

中文说明

📊 接管里程碑 —— 第 10/100 轮（当前窗口）。统计：推送修复 10 次、审阅无需改动 3 次、超时 0 次、验证拒绝 0 次、其他轮次（崩溃/模型错误/门错误/infra）0 次、base 更新 0 次。

轮次到这个量值得人工看一眼。可选：继续（无需操作）；若轮次持续累积，考虑拆分或缩减 PR；或释放接管（移除 autofix/takeover 标签或评论 @qwen-code /takeover stop）。不操作则托管照常继续。

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Reviewed the latest feedback — no changes needed. Why, point by point: · 已审阅最新反馈——无需改动。逐点说明原因如下：

Autofix Review — No Action Required (PR #8147)

This round has no actionable feedback:

• Reviews: none
• Inline comments: none
• Issue-level comments: none
• Failed checks: none
• Still-red checks: none

Critical-only mode is active after 10 change-producing rounds. The deferred non-Critical items (two inline suggestions from the automated reviewer on qwen-triage.yml) remain open for human follow-up and were not addressed per the critical-only policy.

No code changes were made.

中文说明

Autofix 审查 — 无需操作（PR #8147）

本轮没有可执行的反馈：

• 审查意见：无
• 行内评论：无
• Issue 级别评论：无
• 失败的检查：无
• 持续失败的检查：无

经过 10 个产生改动的轮次后，已进入仅处理 Critical 的模式。被延后的非 Critical 条目（自动审查器在 qwen-triage.yml 上的两条行内建议）保持开放，留待人工跟进，按照仅处理 Critical 的策略本轮不予处理。

未做任何代码改动。

Deferred non-Critical feedback

Critical-only mode is active after 10 change-producing rounds. The workflow excluded the non-Critical feedback below from this round's actionable sections; the items remain open for human follow-up. Maintainer feedback is deferred only after its author has used 2 regular feedback batches in this window's Critical-only tail; authors at that budget, if any, are named below. (@qwen-code /retry starts a fresh counting window.)

• Review by @qwen-code-ci-bot: fix(triage): render the verify report as sanitized markdown, not an escaped pre dump #8147 (review)
• Inline rc:3694468705 .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml:3508: fix(triage): render the verify report as sanitized markdown, not an escaped pre dump #8147 (comment)
• Inline rc:3694468711 .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml:3529: fix(triage): render the verify report as sanitized markdown, not an escaped pre dump #8147 (comment)

中文说明

完成 10 个产生改动的轮次后进入仅处理 Critical 的模式。本轮可执行区域已排除下方非 Critical 反馈；这些条目保持开放，留待人工跟进。维护者反馈仅在其本人于本窗口 Critical-only 阶段已使用 2 批常规反馈预算后才会延后；达到预算的作者（如有）在下方点名。（评论 @qwen-code /retry 可开启新的计数窗口。）

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max-preview

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Reviewed. Not reviewed: build-and-test — Test (macos-latest, Node 22.x) and Test (windows-latest, Node 22.x) were skipped in CI; the BSD-sed/Windows fallback path (emit_block sed -E un-escape) did not run locally, which used Linux GNU sed only. Not linted (tool limitation, not a blocker): the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted.

中文说明

已审查。 未审查：build-and-test — Test (macos-latest, Node 22.x) and Test (windows-latest, Node 22.x) were skipped in CI; the BSD-sed/Windows fallback path (emit_block sed -E un-escape) did not run locally, which used Linux GNU sed only。 未检查（工具限制，非阻断）：the executable-script lint — .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml: actionlint embedded-shell source mapping is not yet supported — not linted。

— qwen3.8-max-preview via Qwen Code /review

[wenshao]

@qwen-code /triage

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Sandboxed verification: ⚠️ incomplete — infrastructure failure - workflow run

The verification job did not complete (checkout, runner, or setup error) and produced no report. See the workflow run for details.

中文 — 判定：⚠️ 未完成 · 基础设施故障

验证作业未完成（检出、runner 或初始化错误），未生成报告。详见工作流运行日志。

— Qwen Code · sandboxed verification

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

LGTM, looks ready to ship. ✅

[qwen-code-dev-bot]

🤖 Reviewed the latest feedback — no changes needed. Why, point by point: · 已审阅最新反馈——无需改动。逐点说明原因如下：

No action taken

This round has no actionable feedback:

• Reviews: none
• Inline comments: none
• Issue-level comments: none
• Failed checks: none
• Still-red checks: none

The only feedback present is in the Deferred non-Critical feedback section (automated reviewer suggestions deferred under Critical-only mode after 10 change-producing rounds). Per the review policy, that section is an audit record for human follow-up, not work for this round. No code changes, thread resolutions, or comment replies were made.

中文说明

未采取任何操作

本轮没有可执行的反馈：

• 评审：无
• 行内评论：无
• Issue 级评论：无
• 失败的检查：无
• 持续失败的检查：无

唯一存在的反馈位于延后的非 Critical 反馈区域（在 10 个产生改动的轮次后，仅 Critical 模式下被延后的自动审查建议）。根据评审策略，该区域是供人工跟进的审计记录，不属于本轮的工作范围。未进行任何代码修改、主题解决或评论回复。

Deferred non-Critical feedback

Critical-only mode is active after 10 change-producing rounds. The workflow excluded the non-Critical feedback below from this round's actionable sections; the items remain open for human follow-up. Maintainer feedback is deferred only after its author has used 2 regular feedback batches in this window's Critical-only tail; authors at that budget, if any, are named below. (@qwen-code /retry starts a fresh counting window.)

• Review by @qwen-code-ci-bot: fix(triage): render the verify report as sanitized markdown, not an escaped pre dump #8147 (review)
• PR comment by @qwen-code-ci-bot: fix(triage): render the verify report as sanitized markdown, not an escaped pre dump #8147 (comment)

中文说明

完成 10 个产生改动的轮次后进入仅处理 Critical 的模式。本轮可执行区域已排除下方非 Critical 反馈；这些条目保持开放，留待人工跟进。维护者反馈仅在其本人于本窗口 Critical-only 阶段已使用 2 批常规反馈预算后才会延后；达到预算的作者（如有）在下方点名。（评论 @qwen-code /retry 可开启新的计数窗口。）

Base-conflict check · 基分支冲突检查: no conflict with main. · 与 main 无冲突。

---

🧠 Handled by Qwen Code · model/模型 qwen3.8-max-preview

[wenshao]

Local verification of cea325f7 — real step, real GitHub renderer

I built the PR locally and ran the actual workflow step offline against GitHub's own renderer, rather than a local markdown approximation. Posting the evidence as a merge reference.

Harness. Extract the Post verification report comment step from .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml on both arms — base 2bbd82f1 and the merge commit of refs/pull/8147/merge (head cea325f7) — de-indent the run: block, and execute it with a stubbed gh, a synthetic verify-results/ tree, and a real report.md. The composed $BODY_FILE is then posted to a scratch repo and read back as body_html, which is the real comment pipeline including GitHub's sanitizer.

Fidelity anchor (what makes the rest credible). Fed the real report.md recovered from #8140's verify comment — the exhibit this PR is named after — the base arm reproduces that actually-posted comment byte-for-byte: 12,616 / 12,616 chars identical, the only delta being the evidence-image block my replay had no images for. The harness is running the real composer, not a model of it.

Result

Gate	Result
PR's own suite (merge worktree)	117 / 117 pass
qwen-triage.yml YAML parse	OK (7 jobs)
ESLint on the changed test file	clean
Base-arm fidelity vs posted #8140 comment	byte-identical
Readability goal	achieved — see below
Security floor, 31 hostile bodies through GitHub's renderer	holds on every axis but one
Regression vs base	1 found — entity-encoded @ fires a live mention

1. The readability goal is met

Same real #8140 report, both arms, rendered by GitHub:

	BASE (emit_block)	HEAD (emit_report)
<table>	0	2
<code> spans	1	123
<h2> headings	0	5
<strong>	3	36
<pre>	1 (the entire report)	0

2. The security floor holds

30 adversarial fixtures plus one combined hostile report, each run through the real step and rendered by GitHub. Across all 31 bodies:

• 0 live <img> / <script> / <iframe> from injected raw HTML;
• 0 live event-handler attributes — <details open ontoggle="…"> is not promoted, because the allowlist matches the exact tag only; <DETAILS>, <details/> and <summary /> likewise stay escaped;
• exactly 2 qwen-triage markers in the raw body — the composer's own. Forgery fails in prose, in code spans, in fences, and in entity form (<!-- … -->);
• fold balance at the footer is 0 and the footer survives in every case — surplus </details> are dropped, unclosed opens are closed, and a </details> quoted in code is correctly ignored;
• feeding the sanitizer's own stash sentinels (raw U+0000 / U+0001) back in produces no tag — the input strip is complete;
• entity-encoded markup is inert: <img src=x onerror=1> renders as literal text, and [x](javascript:…) does not become a link.

Fallbacks fire exactly where they should — fence still open at EOF, a non-blank line dedenting below the fence opener, an oversized raw report, and a report that only exceeds the cap after sanitizing. Worst case measured body is 46,139 bytes, comfortably inside GitHub's 65,536 limit.

One behaviour worth recording because it is not obvious from the code: a CRLF report opens no fence at all — JavaScript's . excludes \r, so the opener regex never matches — and the whole file is prose-escaped end to end. That is the safe direction; the cost is that a CRLF report shows entities literally inside code.

3. One finding: an entity-encoded @ in prose still fires a real mention

Guarantee 3 defuses a literal @ with a ZWSP, which works. But escProse deliberately leaves & alone, so an @ that arrives already entity-encoded passes through untouched — and GitHub decodes character references before the mention filter runs. All four spellings fire:

source in report prose	HEAD renders
@name	live user-mention anchor
@name	live user-mention anchor
@name	live user-mention anchor
@name	live user-mention anchor

This is not just an anchor — it reaches the notification path. Two fresh issues, one comment each, self-mention only:

• base shape (& escaped) → timeline [commented]
• head shape (@name) → timeline [commented, mentioned, subscribed]

Base was immune because html_escape escapes & unconditionally, so this is a regression against main on a guarantee the PR itself claims. Reachability is the ordinary threat model already stated in the code comment: report.md is agent output from a sandbox that ran PR code, and a report about entity handling — a verification report for this very PR, say — is exactly where an entity-encoded @ shows up in prose.

Severity is proportionate, not dramatic: no code execution, and it needs the report to contain an entity-@ immediately followed by a real login. It sits alongside the phishing-link surface the PR already names as accepted. But it is one line to close, so I would rather not ship it.

Validated fix — re-escape the & of the entity forms before the ZWSP pass, inside escProse:

.replace(/<!--/g, "<!\\-\\-")
.replace(/&(#0*(?:64|[xX]0*40);|commat;)/g, "&amp;$1")   // <-- add
.replace(/@/g, "@&#8203;");

Measured with the patch applied: live mentions 4 → 0 (matching base), 117 / 117 tests still pass, YAML still parses, all 30 / 30 adversarial fixtures still clean, and the composed body on the real #8140 report is byte-identical to the unpatched head — so it costs nothing in readability.

4. The description has drifted from the code

The repo squash-merges, so the PR body becomes the commit message. Three items are stale as of cea325f7:

• guarantee 3 still reads "@ becomes @: renders identically, can never ping" — the code uses a ZWSP now, and @ is measurably not inert (this is the finding above);
• "108/108 pass" — the suite is at 117;
• the grep/|| true note in Tests describes the old shell fold-balancer; balancing happens in the node sanitizer now.

Recommendation

The change does what it sets out to do, and the hardening across eleven rounds holds up under a real renderer. My call: apply the one-liner and refresh the description, then merge.

Not covered

Replay is offline — I did not run a real Actions job; the evidence-image hosting path is untouched by this PR and was stubbed; report generation by the verify agent itself is out of scope. Fixtures are mine, not sampled from production reports.

中文说明

对 cea325f7 的本地验证 —— 真实步骤 + GitHub 真实渲染器

我在本地构建了这个 PR，并把工作流的真实步骤离线跑起来，用 GitHub 自己的渲染器做判据，而不是本地的 markdown 近似实现。以下证据供合并参考。

测试装置。 从两个分支的 .github/workflows/qwen-triage.yml 中抽出 Post verification report comment 步骤 —— base 2bbd82f1 与 refs/pull/8147/merge 的合并提交（head cea325f7）—— 去掉 run: 块缩进后，配合打桩的 gh、构造的 verify-results/ 目录树和真实的 report.md 直接执行。生成的 $BODY_FILE 再发到一个临时仓库并以 body_html 读回，这条链路就是真实的评论管线，包含 GitHub 的净化器。

保真锚点（后续结论可信的前提）。 我从 #8140 的验证评论（也就是本 PR 命名所指的那个实例）中还原出真实的 report.md 喂进去：base 臂逐字节复现了当时实际发布的评论 —— 12,616 / 12,616 字符完全一致，唯一差异是我的回放没有证据图片因而缺少图片区块。这说明装置跑的是真实组装器，而非它的模型。

结论

门禁	结果
PR 自带测试套件（merge worktree）	117 / 117 通过
qwen-triage.yml YAML 解析	正常（7 个 job）
改动测试文件的 ESLint	干净
base 臂与已发布 #8140 评论的保真度	逐字节一致
可读性目标	达成 —— 见下
31 个敌意 body 经 GitHub 渲染器的安全底线	除一条外全部成立
相对 base 的回归	发现 1 处 —— 实体编码的 @ 会触发真实提及

1. 可读性目标已达成

同一份真实的 #8140 报告，两臂对照，由 GitHub 渲染：

	BASE（emit_block）	HEAD（emit_report）
<table>	0	2
<code> 代码片段	1	123
<h2> 标题	0	5
<strong>	3	36
<pre>	1（整份报告）	0

2. 安全底线成立

30 个敌意 fixture 外加一份综合敌意报告，每个都经真实步骤组装并由 GitHub 渲染。在全部 31 个 body 上：

• 注入的原始 HTML 产生 0 个活的 <img> / <script> / <iframe>；
• 0 个活的事件处理属性 —— <details open ontoggle="…"> 不会被回解，因为白名单只匹配精确标签；<DETAILS>、<details/>、<summary /> 同样保持转义；
• 原始 body 中恰好 2 个 qwen-triage 标记，即组装器自身的那两个。伪造在正文、代码片段、围栏内以及实体形态（<!-- … -->）下全部失败；
• 页脚处折叠配平为 0，且页脚在每个用例中都存活 —— 多余的 </details> 被丢弃，未闭合的开标签被补齐，代码中引用的 </details> 被正确忽略；
• 把净化器自己的暂存哨兵（原始 U+0000 / U+0001）回灌进去也构造不出标签，说明入口处的剥离是完整的；
• 实体编码的标记语言是惰性的：<img src=x onerror=1> 渲染为纯文本，[x](javascript:…) 也不会变成链接。

回退分支的触发位置准确 —— EOF 时围栏仍开启、非空行缩进退到围栏开启者之下、原始报告超限、以及净化之后才超限的报告。实测最大 body 为 46,139 字节，远在 GitHub 的 65,536 限制之内。

有一个从代码上不易看出、值得记录的行为：CRLF 报告根本不会开启围栏 —— JavaScript 的 . 不匹配 \r，开启正则永远匹配不上 —— 于是整份文件从头到尾走正文转义。这是安全的方向；代价是 CRLF 报告会在代码中原样显示实体。

3. 一处发现：正文中实体编码的 @ 仍会触发真实提及

保证 3 用 ZWSP 熄火字面量 @，这一点是有效的。但 escProse 有意不动 &，因此本来就以实体编码到达的 @ 会原样穿过 —— 而 GitHub 在提及过滤器运行之前就解码了字符引用。四种写法全部触发：

报告正文中的源写法	HEAD 的渲染结果
@name	活的 user-mention 锚点
@name	活的 user-mention 锚点
@name	活的 user-mention 锚点
@name	活的 user-mention 锚点

而且这不只是一个锚点，它会走到通知链路。两个全新 issue、各一条评论、仅自我提及：

• base 形态（& 已转义）→ timeline [commented]
• head 形态（@name）→ timeline [commented, mentioned, subscribed]

base 因为 html_escape 无条件转义 & 而免疫，所以这是相对 main 的回归，且恰好落在 PR 自己声称的那条保证上。可达性就是代码注释里已经写明的常规威胁模型：report.md 是在运行过 PR 代码的沙箱中产生的 agent 输出，而一份讨论实体处理的报告（比如针对本 PR 自身的验证报告）正是实体编码 @ 出现在正文里的典型场合。

严重度需要按比例看待，不必夸大：没有代码执行，且需要报告中的实体 @ 紧跟一个真实登录名。它与 PR 已明确接受的钓鱼链接面属于同一量级。但它只需一行即可关闭，所以我倾向于不要就这样合入。

已验证的修复 —— 在 escProse 中，于 ZWSP 处理之前把实体形态的 & 重新转义：

.replace(/<!--/g, "<!\\-\\-")
.replace(/&(#0*(?:64|[xX]0*40);|commat;)/g, "&amp;$1")   // <-- 新增
.replace(/@/g, "@&#8203;");

打上补丁后的实测：活的提及 4 → 0（与 base 一致），117 / 117 测试仍通过，YAML 仍可解析，全部 30 / 30 敌意 fixture 仍然干净，且在真实 #8140 报告上组装出的 body 与未打补丁的 head 逐字节一致 —— 也就是说它不带来任何可读性成本。

4. 描述已与代码脱节

本仓库使用 squash 合并，PR 正文会成为提交信息。截至 cea325f7 有三处已经过时：

• 保证 3 仍写作 "@ becomes @: renders identically, can never ping" —— 代码现在用的是 ZWSP，而 @ 经实测并非惰性（即上面那处发现）；
• "108/108 pass" —— 套件现在是 117；
• Tests 一节中关于 grep / || true 的说明描述的是旧的 shell 折叠配平器，配平现在发生在 node 净化器里。

建议

这个改动达成了它设定的目标，十一轮的加固在真实渲染器下也站得住。我的判断：打上那一行补丁并刷新描述，然后合入。

未覆盖范围

回放是离线的 —— 我没有跑真实的 Actions 作业；证据图片托管路径不受本 PR 影响且被打桩；验证 agent 自身的报告生成不在范围内。fixture 由我构造，并非从生产报告中采样。

---

_{Verified locally with Claude Code (model: Claude Opus 5, 1M context).}

[yiliang114]

LGTM. Security model is solid: escape-all + allowlist un-escape, global marker breaking, ZWSP mention neutralization, prose-only fold balancing. Fail-closed fallbacks for oversized/fence-unclosed/sanitizer-error. Thorough test coverage. ✅

[qwen-code-ci-bot]

Released in v0.21.3.