docs(core): fix typos in ide notification comments - #6623
Conversation
Correct "defineded" -> "defined" and "compatability" -> "compatibility" in the IdeDiffClosed backwards-compatibility comments. Comment-only; no behavior change.
|
Thanks for the PR! Template looks good ✓ Problem: Real, verifiable typos — Direction: Pure comment cleanup in Size: Core paths touched — 4 production lines (2 additions + 2 deletions across 2 files, all comment-only). Zero test/schema/generated lines. Well below any threshold. Approach: Minimal and focused — exactly the two typos mentioned, nothing else. Scope feels right. Moving on to code review. 🔍 中文说明感谢贡献！ 模板完整 ✓ 问题： 真实可验证的拼写错误 —— IDE 包两处开发者注释中的 方向： 纯注释清理，位于 规模： 触及核心路径 —— 4 行生产代码（2 个文件各 1 增 1 删，全部为注释）。零测试/schema/生成代码行。远低于任何阈值。 方案： 最小且聚焦 —— 仅修改提到的两个拼写错误，无其他改动。范围合理。 进入代码审查 🔍 — Qwen Code · qwen3.7-max |
qwen-code-ci-bot
added
category/core
Code ReviewIndependent proposal: find all instances of Grep confirms only 2 instances exist — both in
No critical blockers. No AGENTS.md violations. The diff is precisely the minimal change needed — two comment lines, nothing more. Patch applies cleanly against current main. TestingTmux real-scenario testing is N/A for this PR — the changes are purely in code comments ( Typecheck: unaffected (comments are stripped during TS compilation). VerdictClean, minimal, correct. Every change in the diff is needed for the stated goal. 中文说明代码审查独立方案：在代码库中查找所有 Grep 确认仅存在 2 处 —— 均在
无关键阻断问题，无 AGENTS.md 违规。Diff 恰好是达成目标所需的最小改动 —— 仅两行注释，无多余内容。 补丁可干净地应用于当前 main 分支。 测试Tmux 真实场景测试不适用 —— 改动仅在代码注释（ 类型检查：不受影响（注释在 TS 编译时被剥离）。 结论干净、最小化、正确。Diff 中的每处改动都是达成目标所必需的。 — Qwen Code · qwen3.7-max |
|
Straightforward comment typo fix. The typos are real (confirmed in source), the diff is minimal (two lines, nothing extraneous), and the fix is correct. No code, types, or behavior touched. Approving — this is exactly the kind of small, focused cleanup PR that's easy to review, merge, and forget about. ✅ 中文说明简单的注释拼写修复。拼写错误真实存在（已在源码中确认），diff 最小化（两行，无多余内容），修复正确。不涉及代码、类型或行为。 批准 —— 这是一个小型、聚焦的清理 PR，易于审查、合并和维护。✅ — Qwen Code · qwen3.7-max |
qwen-code-ci-bot
left a comment
qwen-code-ci-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, looks ready to ship. ✅
qwen-code-ci-bot
left a comment
qwen-code-ci-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No review findings. Downgraded from Approve to Comment: CI still running.
— qwen3.7-max via Qwen Code /review
doudouOUC
left a comment
doudouOUC
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No issues found. LGTM! ✅
— qwen3.7-max via Qwen Code /review
qwen-code-ci-bot
left a comment
qwen-code-ci-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No review findings. Downgraded from Approve to Comment: CI still running.
— qwen3.7-max via Qwen Code /review
4 participants
What this PR does
Fixes two misspellings in the
IdeDiffClosedbackwards-compatibility comments in the coreidepackage:defineded→definedandcompatability→compatibility(appears in bothtypes.tsandide-client.ts).Why it's needed
Small readability/correctness cleanup —
definededandcompatabilityare clear typos in developer-facing comments. Comment-only; no code, types, or behavior are touched.Reviewer Test Plan
How to verify
git diffshows only two comment lines changed. No runtime surface — comments do not affect compilation or behavior.npm run typecheck/npm run buildare unaffected.Evidence (Before & After)
N/A — comment-only change, nothing user-visible.
Tested on
Comment-only; no runtime behavior to test. CI typecheck/lint cover it on all three.
Environment (optional)
N/A
Risk & Scope
Linked Issues
None.
中文说明
这个 PR 做了什么
修正 core
ide包中IdeDiffClosed向后兼容注释里的两个拼写错误:defineded→defined,compatability→compatibility(出现在types.ts和ide-client.ts两处)。为什么需要
小的可读性/正确性清理 ——
defineded和compatability是开发者注释中明显的拼写错误。仅改注释,不涉及任何代码、类型或行为。审阅者测试计划
git diff仅显示两行注释变更。注释不影响编译或行为,无运行时影响;typecheck/build不受影响。前后对比:N/A(仅注释)。测试环境:N/A。风险与范围
无 —— 仅注释,无破坏性变更。
关联 Issue
无。