fix(channel-test): support tiered billing model tests - #4145
Merged
Calcium-Ion merged 1 commit intoApr 9, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. 🗂️ Base branches to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Pre-fill BillingRequestInput from dto.Request before ModelPriceHelper, so tiered_expr billing resolves param() from the structured request instead of reading HTTP body (which is empty in channel-test context). - attachTestBillingRequestInput: marshal dto.Request → RequestInput - ResolveIncomingBillingExprRequestInput: early-return when pre-filled - settleTestQuota / buildTestLogOther: align test settlement & logging with production TryTieredSettle / InjectTieredBillingInfo paths No changes to common/gin.go or common/body_storage.go.
Calcium-Ion
force-pushed
the
fix/channel-test-tiered-billing
branch
from
April 9, 2026 09:07
5ea0ce0 to
8f3f048
Compare
nk33-dev
pushed a commit
to nanashiwang/new-api
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
Pre-fill BillingRequestInput from dto.Request before ModelPriceHelper, so tiered_expr billing resolves param() from the structured request instead of reading HTTP body (which is empty in channel-test context). - attachTestBillingRequestInput: marshal dto.Request → RequestInput - ResolveIncomingBillingExprRequestInput: early-return when pre-filled - settleTestQuota / buildTestLogOther: align test settlement & logging with production TryTieredSettle / InjectTieredBillingInfo paths
isboyjc
pushed a commit
to isboyjc/amux-api
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2026
Pre-fill BillingRequestInput from dto.Request before ModelPriceHelper, so tiered_expr billing resolves param() from the structured request instead of reading HTTP body (which is empty in channel-test context). - attachTestBillingRequestInput: marshal dto.Request → RequestInput - ResolveIncomingBillingExprRequestInput: early-return when pre-filled - settleTestQuota / buildTestLogOther: align test settlement & logging with production TryTieredSettle / InjectTieredBillingInfo paths
Jinxuans
referenced
this pull request
in TokFlux-Org/TokFlux
May 9, 2026
Pre-fill BillingRequestInput from dto.Request before ModelPriceHelper, so tiered_expr billing resolves param() from the structured request instead of reading HTTP body (which is empty in channel-test context). - attachTestBillingRequestInput: marshal dto.Request → RequestInput - ResolveIncomingBillingExprRequestInput: early-return when pre-filled - settleTestQuota / buildTestLogOther: align test settlement & logging with production TryTieredSettle / InjectTieredBillingInfo paths
xyfacai
pushed a commit
to xyfacai/new-api
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2026
Pre-fill BillingRequestInput from dto.Request before ModelPriceHelper, so tiered_expr billing resolves param() from the structured request instead of reading HTTP body (which is empty in channel-test context). - attachTestBillingRequestInput: marshal dto.Request → RequestInput - ResolveIncomingBillingExprRequestInput: early-return when pre-filled - settleTestQuota / buildTestLogOther: align test settlement & logging with production TryTieredSettle / InjectTieredBillingInfo paths
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
💡 沟通提示 / Pre-submission
📝 变更描述 / Description
修复模型启用阶梯计费（
tiered_expr）后，渠道测试无法正常测试模型🚀 变更类型 / Type of change
🔗 关联任务 / Related Issue
✅ 提交前检查项 / Checklist
📸 运行证明 / Proof of Work
(请在此粘贴截图、关键日志或测试报告，以证明变更生效)
