Skip to content

fix: health check - #2428

Merged
Calcium-Ion merged 1 commit into
QuantumNous:mainfrom
seefs001:fix/health-check
Dec 12, 2025
Merged

fix: health check#2428
Calcium-Ion merged 1 commit into
QuantumNous:mainfrom
seefs001:fix/health-check

Conversation

@seefs001

@seefs001 seefs001 commented Dec 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

fix #2427

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added wget utility to the Docker runtime image for enhanced system capabilities in containerized deployments.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Walkthrough

The Dockerfile is modified to add wget to the package installation list in the final Docker image stage, expanding the runtime environment's system utilities without changing other build steps.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docker Configuration
Dockerfile
Added wget package to apt-get install command in final stage, extending the runtime image's available system utilities

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Single-line package addition to Docker build configuration
  • No logic changes or architectural impact
  • Straightforward configuration modification

Poem

🐰 A wget joins the Docker night,
With certificates, timezones, and asan bright,
One package added, lean and light,
The image downloads without a fight! 📦✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'fix: health check' is vague and does not clearly convey what specific health check issue is being fixed or how it relates to adding wget to the Docker image. Provide a more specific title that explains the health check fix, such as 'fix: add wget to Docker runtime for health check' or similar.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e1bee48 and 48a17ef.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)

31-31: Verify that the health check is fully implemented.

Adding wget is a reasonable choice for health checks. However, no HEALTHCHECK instruction is defined in the Dockerfile itself.

Please confirm:

  1. Where is the actual health check command defined (docker-compose, k8s manifests, etc.)?
  2. Does the health check properly use wget to ping the application on port 3000?

For best practices, consider defining the health check directly in the Dockerfile using a HEALTHCHECK instruction (e.g., HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s --start-period=10s --retries=3 CMD wget --no-verbose --tries=1 --spider http://localhost:3000/health || exit 1). This makes the health check portable and self-contained.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Calcium-Ion
Calcium-Ion merged commit e9fb2cc into QuantumNous:main Dec 12, 2025
1 check passed
Ridter pushed a commit to Ridter/new-api that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
ennnnny pushed a commit to ennnnny/new-api that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

新版镜像 检查监控健康失败

2 participants