Update docstrings for renamed scheduling passes (backport #7884)#7951
Merged
Conversation
* Update docstrings for renamed scheduling passes In #7835 we renamed the passes used in the new scheduler pass workflow to differentiate them from the existing legacy scheduling pass workflow (which we restored pending a future deprecation in that PR). However, while we updated the docstring for the legacy path to update them to point to the new passes, we neglected to update the docstrings for the renamed classes to reflect the new names. The examples in the docstrings still worked because of the old passes, but it wasn't showing an example of how to use the new workflow anymore. This commit corrects this oversight so that they actually explain how to use them. * Add scheduling section to top level transpiler doc * Update reference * Fix lint * Fix typos Co-authored-by: Naoki Kanazawa <nkanazawa1989@gmail.com> * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Kevin Hartman <kevin@hart.mn> Co-authored-by: Naoki Kanazawa <nkanazawa1989@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Kevin Hartman <kevin@hart.mn> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit a4edc11)
Collaborator
|
Thank you for opening a new pull request. Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone. One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:
|
jakelishman
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2022
jakelishman
added
automerge
Changelog: None
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #7884 done by Mergify.
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refreshwill re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebasewill rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio updatewill merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>will backport this PR on<destination>branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com