Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

Use job creation date when returning backend properties in job.properties()#746

Merged
kt474 merged 3 commits into
Qiskit:mainfrom
kt474:job-properties
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Use job creation date when returning backend properties in job.properties()#746
kt474 merged 3 commits into
Qiskit:mainfrom
kt474:job-properties

Conversation

@kt474
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kt474 kt474 commented Oct 8, 2023

Summary

fixes #730

Details and comments

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coveralls commented Oct 8, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 6449377503

  • 0 of 2 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 51.249%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
qiskit_ibm_provider/job/ibm_job.py 0 2 0.0%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
qiskit_ibm_provider/job/ibm_job.py 1 68.29%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 6421713008: -0.02%
Covered Lines: 3364
Relevant Lines: 6564

💛 - Coveralls

@kt474 kt474 requested a review from merav-aharoni October 8, 2023 19:13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@merav-aharoni merav-aharoni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change looks fine. The only question is whether we want to allow the user to pass in a datetime or only return the properties at creation time (as @jyu00 wrote), with no other option.

@kt474
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

kt474 commented Oct 9, 2023

The change looks fine. The only question is whether we want to allow the user to pass in a datetime or only return the properties at creation time (as @jyu00 wrote), with no other option.

You're right, I don't think it makes sense to allow the user to pass in their own datetime here, i'll make that change

@kt474 kt474 merged commit 6317d5c into Qiskit:main Oct 9, 2023
@kt474 kt474 deleted the job-properties branch October 9, 2023 15:47
kt474 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2023
* Update main 0.7.1 (#719)

* Fix typing in `DAGCircuit.apply_operation_back` (#721)

It is not valid typing (per the documentation) to pass `None` to
`DAGCircuit.apply_operation_back` in either the `qargs` or `cargs`
field, though this has been silently accepted previously to support
mistaken code in the Terra schedulers, which this repository has
inherited.

* Update serialization for non-basic types (#715)

* Update json.py

* Update json.py

* Added test for metadata serialization

* added release notes

* Moved test here from qiskit-ibm-runtime (#722)

* Moved here from qiskit-ibm-runtime

* Fixed imports

* Removed code related to Schedule (#724)

* Removed code related to Schedule, qubit_lo_freq, mea_lo_freq, schedule_los

* black and lint

* Returned lines in documentation that were removed by mistake

* Fixed documentation

* Put back range parameters

* Removed auth parameter and migrate method (#727)

* Removed auth parameter and migrate method

* Updated documentation

* black

* Remove `qiskit-ibmq-provider` from `requirements-dev.txt` (#729)

* Remove qiskit-ibmq-provider from requirements-dev.txt

* Remove IBMQ

* Breaking change in Qiskit 0.45 - Gate.duration setting (#732)

* breaking change in Qiskit 0.45

* black

* Bit.index is deprecated since Apr 2021 (#733)

Co-authored-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@ibm.com>

* Update hms_to_seconds to support times greater than 1 day (#731)

* Update hms_to_seconds

* add reno

* Add option to no pad idle qubits in scheduling passes (#725)

* Add option to no pad idle qubits in scheduling passes

This commit adds a new flag to the scheduling padding passes,
schedule_idle_qubits, which is used to opt-in to scheduling idle qubits.
By default these passes will only schedule qubits which are active. This
is a change in behavior from before where the previous default is all
qubits were scheduled. This was undesireable because it's adding
uneceesary instructions to the job payload which will need to be
processed which are effectively a no-op. The only real use case for
adding delays to idle wires is visualization, so it's left as an option
to re-enable the previous default.

Fixes #723

Co-authored-by: Thomas Alexander <thomas.a.alexander@ibm.com>

* Add missing inline type hint

* Don't put barriers on idle qubits either

* Fix formatting

* Add schedule_idle_qubits to parent constructor

* Reneable padding in control flow

* Omit idle qubits in control flow

* Run black

---------

Co-authored-by: Thomas Alexander <thomas.a.alexander@ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Diego Ristè <10402430+dieris@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@ibm.com>

* Update test_jobs_filter (#738)

* readjust test_convert_id_to_delay (#739)

* readjust test_convert_id_to_delay

* disable not-context-manager

* duplicated entry

* Exceptions should inherit from Terra where suitable (#741)

* Changed inheritance of exception classes

* Changed error type

* Support method job.properties() (#742)

* Implemented job.properties() method

* release note

* Updated documentation

* Improved the tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@ibm.com>

* Use job creation date when returning backend properties in `job.properties()` (#746)

* use job creation date in properties

* add reno

* remove datetime param

* update test_job_backend_properties (#747)

* Support shots as np.int64 (#744)

* Fixed bug where shots defined as np.number

* Added test

* black

* add reno

---------

Co-authored-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@ibm.com>

* use qpy.load from terra (#751)

* remove print statement in test (#752)

* Prepare release 0.7.1 (#753)

* Update main branch 0.7.2 (#754)

* migrate pypi trusted publisher (#750)

---------

Co-authored-by: Jake Lishman <jake.lishman@ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: ItamarGoldman <51112651+ItamarGoldman@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: merav-aharoni <merav@il.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Luciano Bello <bel@zurich.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <mtreinish@kortar.org>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Alexander <thomas.a.alexander@ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Diego Ristè <10402430+dieris@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

job.properties() doesn't do anything

3 participants