Skip to content

Draft PR: Batch Validators and related changes#83

Closed
dmidem wants to merge 41 commits intozsa1from
ivk-to-bytes-visibility-downgrade-with-burn-valid-and-batch-validators
Closed

Draft PR: Batch Validators and related changes#83
dmidem wants to merge 41 commits intozsa1from
ivk-to-bytes-visibility-downgrade-with-burn-valid-and-batch-validators

Conversation

@dmidem
Copy link

@dmidem dmidem commented Sep 21, 2023

This draft pull request (PR) encompasses all changes from the ivk-to-bytes-visibility-downgrade-with-burn-valid branch, which has its own PR to zsa1 (#81). But additionally, it contains changes related to BatchValidators, which were initially implemented but later reverted in the ivk-to-bytes-visibility-downgrade-with-burn-valid branch. Batch Validators are not currently used in the project, so this PR actually preserves the work for future reference and potential reintegration if needed. The PR is marked as a draft to indicate that it's not ready for merging.

Changes Included:

  1. Fix Orchard bundle BatchValidator:

    • Corrects the Orchard bundle BatchValidator by adding a call to the validate_bundle_burn function from the validate function.
  2. Add BatchValidator for Issue bundle:

    • Introduces a new BatchValidator for IssueBundle, which includes a call to the verify_issue_bundle function from the validate function.

alexeykoren and others added 30 commits June 26, 2023 09:14
…undle-in-v5-vector-serialization-with-burn-valid branch
Changes Made:
- Updated Rust version to 1.65 in Cargo.toml and other relevant configuration files.
- Removed pins for dependencies that were previously locked to older Rust versions.
- Updated CI configuration to use Rust 1.65.

impl Eq for IssuanceValidatingKey {}

impl DynamicUsage for IssuanceValidatingKey {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove if unneeded

@PaulLaux PaulLaux marked this pull request as draft October 3, 2023 20:28
@PaulLaux PaulLaux mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2023
@dmidem
Copy link
Author

dmidem commented Oct 16, 2023

Closed in favour of #81 and #88

@dmidem dmidem closed this Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants