-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
[Perf] Avoid tx root derivation during block generation #2577
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
vicsn
merged 7 commits into
ProvableHQ:staging
from
ProvableHQ:avoid_root_derivation_during_block_generation
Feb 17, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f6e91d3
Skip transaction root check in release mode
vicsn c0c6179
Compute transaction_id from {execution, deployment}_id
vicsn 2f55fc1
Cache the deployment and execution id in the Transaction
vicsn 1f2b23e
DRY up id calculation
vicsn b05b4f1
Add ExecutionTree and DeploymentTree
vicsn 2b12ad6
Use more precise deployment_or_execution_tree
vicsn e07e224
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/staging' into avoid_root_derivat…
vicsn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is
lenmaking it obvious that this refers to the number of functions in the program? otherwisenum_functionsmight be a better pick; the same comment applies tois_emptyUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed its a bit of an odd naming without context, though it is not unnatural. The
Deploymentcontains just one vector which equals the number of functions/verifying_keys/certificates.I mainly did this to have consistent naming with
Execution::len, where it refers to the number of transitions. This PR then uses bothdeployment.len()andexecution.len()to determine at which "index" to insert an additional Fee transition.I'd be keen to hear more reviewer's thoughts on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, I'd opt for a more precise naming for clarity. But this is fine as well.