RFC #2: Prooflab Evaluation Framework

[yourbuddyconner]

Summary

This PR adds RFC #2, which proposes a comprehensive framework for evaluating Zero-Knowledge Virtual Machines (zkVMs) within the ProofLab ecosystem. The framework defines 15 standardized metrics across performance, security, and usability dimensions, with each resolving to discrete numerical values (1-10) to enable radar chart visualization and objective comparison.

Key Features

• Standardized Metrics: 5 Performance, 5 Security, and 5 Usability metrics with clear evaluation methodologies
• Objective Scoring: Each metric resolves to a 1-10 score with specific calculation methods
• Visualization: Radar chart structure for at-a-glance comparison
• Integration Plan: Detailed architecture for implementing within ProofLab
• Phased Rollout: 3-phase implementation timeline

Implementation Details

The RFC outlines how the evaluation framework will integrate with existing ProofLab components:

1. New benchmarking module for standardized performance testing
2. Extensions to telemetry system for detailed metrics collection
3. Security assessment tools for code analysis and vulnerability tracking
4. Metric calculation engine to convert raw measurements to scores
5. CLI enhancements for evaluation commands
6. Visualization capabilities for radar charts and reports
7. Configuration system for customization

This framework will enhance ProofLab's utility by providing objective comparison data for different zkVM implementations, helping users make informed decisions and tracking the progress of zkVM technology over time.

[yourbuddyconner]

Got a comment from a friend -- this framework should probably differentiate between different kinds of proofs.

Most zkVMs have at least a "core" and "compressed" proof, but also support wrapping the STARK in a groth16 or plonk proof, and the performance of this operation matters a lot.