add ut for device/cambricon - #712
Merged
Merged
Conversation
shijinye
force-pushed
the
cambricon-ut
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 16, 2024 10:28
ae23dd0 to
a9f1553
Compare
Signed-off-by: jinye <jinye.shi@daocloud.io>
shijinye
force-pushed
the
cambricon-ut
branch
from
December 18, 2024 02:38
a9f1553 to
c91cf20
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Member
|
/lgtm |
This was referenced Feb 13, 2025
imgbot Bot
pushed a commit
to haitwang-cloud/HAMi
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2026
Signed-off-by: jinye <jinye.shi@daocloud.io>
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind test
What this PR does / why we need it:
add ut for device/cambricon
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes # #569
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: