Repository navigation
refactor: MFU as torchtitan computes it; relative packing cost #3840
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+307
−345
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
39c2825
refactor: MFU the torchtitan way, relative packing cost
faresobeid 9f28e75
refactor(perf): get_active_params in one module walk, integer expert …
faresobeid bc7f98e
fix(perf): attention FLOPs per packed document, not per micro-batch l…
faresobeid 3fc3d36
refactor(perf): one FlopCounter for MFU and packing
faresobeid b30c5dd
fix(models): build every layer without the gpu-extra kernels
faresobeid 4596d3d
test(perf): build without kernel libraries on a CPU-only host, also o…
faresobeid 4fa181e
refactor(perf): address review - count_active_params defaults to mode…
faresobeid 543e3df
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into pr3840
faresobeid 7dbdf0a
test(perf): hand-count active params of a dense model; drop the qwen3…
faresobeid a306149
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into refactor/flops-estimator
faresobeid bb7ca5f
perf: count indexer scoring forward-only (2x); indexers run under no_…
faresobeid b1f05d3
Merge branch 'main' into refactor/flops-estimator
faresobeid File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we missing the attention params? Thought we'd need another if case for
nn.Linear, e.g.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could also fold those dense attn matmul costs into what
attention_flopsreports, but IMO more natural to include in active param count