Use pip instead of uv pip in upgrade instructions#2841
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jlowin has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 28 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Test Failure AnalysisSummary: The test Root Cause: The test was introduced in commit 8e1fd1d (#2835) and is experiencing intermittent failures. The test intentionally uses a non-existent URL ( This is a flaky test - the exact same test passed on main branch in run #20884597445 just hours earlier, confirming the test itself is sound but has timing issues. Suggested Solution: Mock the HTTP client to avoid real network calls and ensure consistent, fast test execution. The test should use Detailed AnalysisError from logs: Why it happens:
Evidence of flakiness:
Related Files
Note: This failure is not caused by the changes in this PR - it's a pre-existing flaky test introduced in #2835. The PR changes (upgrade instructions) don't affect test behavior. |
Follow-up to #2839. The upgrade message was using
uv pip installwhich assumes users are using uv. Changed to justpip installfor tool-agnostic guidance that works for all users.