Link GroupPolicyDsc resource

[corydwood]

Closes #101

Pull Request (PR) description

This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues

Task list

• This PR changes documentation
• This PR changes DscResource.Template
  • Updated documentation as necessary in the TEMPLATE_README.md.
  • An descriptive entry has been added to the change log
    in the TEMPLATE_README.md.
• This PR changes Tests.Template
  • The template version number has been increased appropriately.
  • An descriptive entry has been added to the CHANGELOG.md under the
    Tests.Template folder.

---

This change is 

New resource module submission

Name: GroupPolicyDsc

Repository URL: https://github.com/corydwood/GroupPolicyDsc

Short description: This module contains the GPInheritance, GPOImport, and GPOLink DSC resources.

New resource module submission task list

This task list can be filled in after the issue has been submitted.

• [] Pass the Quality Governance
• Pull request is sent in (see next section).
• The new module submission in ready for community review.

Steps that pull request should include

• Added submodule using git submodule add https://github.com/<accountname>/<reponame> DscResources/<reponame>.
• Updated resource module list in Maintainers.md.

Community acceptance

Community reviewers: Please submit a comment on the issue for each box that are checked so the
community know who accepted the item.

The new resource module:

• is licensed under MIT.
• has the correct project structure.
• has a dev and master branch, and dev should default branch.
• is using DSC Resource Kit test templates.
• is connected to Codecov or similar.
• has established a code of conduct in ether a CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md or a
  'Code of conduct' section in the README.md.
• has either a CONTRIBUTING.md file or a 'Contributing' section in the
  README.md file.
• has included the metadata tag 'DSCResource' in the module manifest.
• is sufficiently documented.
• has an established CI process for each push to the repository.
• is sufficiently tested.
• Follows the guidelines set out for a
  High Quality Resource Module.

Submission acceptance

The community accepts, at a community call, that a resource module follows the
guidelines set out for a
High Quality Resource Module.

• The resource module was accepted for submission in a community call.

[johlju]

Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @corydwood)

a discussion (no related file):
Please see the steps here:
https://github.com/PowerShell/DscResources/issues/new?template=New_resource_module_submission.md

If you could paste that into the PR description, then we can follow that list? 🙂

---

---

.gitmodules, line 196 at r1 (raw file):

	path = DscResources/WmiNamespaceSecurityDsc
	url = https://github.com/PowerShell/WmiNamespaceSecurityDsc
[submodule "DscResources/GroupPolicyDsc"]

This should have been added using git submodule add https://github.com/<accountname>/<reponame> DscResources/<reponame>, then I think there will also be a reference to module as part of the commit.

[corydwood]

Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @johlju)

a discussion (no related file):

Previously, johlju (Johan Ljunggren) wrote…

Please see the steps here:
https://github.com/PowerShell/DscResources/issues/new?template=New_resource_module_submission.md

If you could paste that into the PR description, then we can follow that list? 🙂

Done.

---

---

.gitmodules, line 196 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, johlju (Johan Ljunggren) wrote…

This should have been added using git submodule add https://github.com/<accountname>/<reponame> DscResources/<reponame>, then I think there will also be a reference to module as part of the commit.

Done.

[johlju]

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r2.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @corydwood)

a discussion (no related file):
Could you please tick off the boxes that is done in the list of the PR description?

---

a discussion (no related file):
Would it be possible to add the appveyor.yml template? It will use the DscResource.Test test framework when running tests, and helps tests things for HQRM (not everything, but some). https://github.com/PowerShell/DscResources/blob/master/DscResource.Template/appveyor.yml

---

a discussion (no related file):
Do you have aplan for deploying this module to the PS Gallery? I can't see it being deployed yet.

---

[johlju]

I of course meant with the review comment if your repo can change to the appveyor.yml template 😄

[stale]

Labeling this pull request (PR) as abandoned since it has gone 14 days or more since the last update. An abandoned PR can be continued by another contributor. The abandoned label will be removed if work on this PR is taken up again.

[gaelcolas]

Disabled the Stale bot and changed the labels.
Also talked to Cory who'll get back to this as soon as he can.

[gaelcolas]

I have permission on the repository, and I will see if I can get this resource in good shape for next Community call where we'll be able to reconsider this.

[gaelcolas]

As announced during the last community call, we'd love to have this as part of dsccommunity.
@corydwood gave me permissions to the repo and I'll try to get this re-homed when we transfer to the new GitHub organisation in a few weeks.