Conversation
feat: add configurable backup file prefix
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughBackup storage paths are now configurable through ChangesConfigurable backup folder
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
ESLint install timed out. The project may have too many dependencies for the sandbox. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@src/utils/file-prefix.ts`:
- Around line 4-15: Update getBackupFolderName to reject BACKUP_FOLDER_NAME
values containing traversal segments such as ".." and ensure the accepted value
remains a confined relative folder before backup paths are built. Preserve the
existing trimming, separator normalization, filtering, and "backups" fallback
for valid values, and ensure backupFolderName continues to derive from the
validated result.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: ffa8e5f5-cbe8-4748-9ebf-a7a89851e88c
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
.env.exampleapp/api/tus/hooks/route.tssrc/env.mjssrc/features/agents/utils/status/storage-channels.helpers.tssrc/features/migration/actions/migration.action.tssrc/features/storages/utils/storages.helpers.tssrc/utils/common.tssrc/utils/file-prefix.tssrc/utils/text.ts
📜 Review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (1)
- GitHub Check: build-image
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ast-grep (0.44.1)
app/api/tus/hooks/route.ts
[warning] 12-14: Regular expression constructed from variable input detected. This can lead to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attacks if the variable contains malicious patterns. Use libraries like 'recheck' to validate regex safety or use static patterns.
Context: new RegExp(
^${backupFolderName}/\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}/[A-Za-z0-9._-]+$,
)
Note: [CWE-1333] Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
(regexp-from-variable)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/env.mjs (1)
69-70: LGTM!Also applies to: 159-159
src/utils/text.ts (1)
68-72: LGTM!.env.example (1)
76-79: LGTM!src/utils/common.ts (1)
9-9: LGTM!src/features/storages/utils/storages.helpers.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM!Also applies to: 18-18, 60-60
src/features/migration/actions/migration.action.ts (1)
12-12: LGTM!Also applies to: 94-94
src/features/agents/utils/status/storage-channels.helpers.ts (1)
1-11: LGTM!Also applies to: 30-31, 42-42, 61-61
app/api/tus/hooks/route.ts (1)
9-15: LGTM!Also applies to: 36-43
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
backupswhen unspecified.