Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polymer setup Instructions resulted in blank screen #423

Closed
eseidel opened this issue Feb 18, 2014 · 7 comments
Closed

Polymer setup Instructions resulted in blank screen #423

eseidel opened this issue Feb 18, 2014 · 7 comments

Comments

@eseidel
Copy link

eseidel commented Feb 18, 2014

I followed the instructions on:
http://www.polymer-project.org/getting-the-code.html

Including installing bower (v1.2.8) npm (1.3.24) and the polymer components:
bower install --save Polymer/polymer-elements
bower install --save Polymer/polymer-ui-elements

However when I follow the instructions to "test my environment" [http://www.polymer-project.org/getting-the-code.html#testbower] by creating an index.html pasting in the referenced HTML, and then running a local server "python -m SimpleHTTPServer". Navigating to http://0.0.0.0:8000, all I get is a blank screen. "OneTwoThreeFourFive" appears briefly (before the script runs) and then disappears in 32.0.1700.107 (Official Build 248368). No messages/exceptions in the chrome console. I tried in FF 27.0.1 and see "OneTwoThreeFourFive" and no messages in the console either. Neither seems to show the intended tab-strip UI.

It appears that whatever version of polymer I pulled is unstable/not-working?

@sgraham
Copy link

sgraham commented Feb 18, 2014

wfm on chrome canary, maybe relies on > 32 chrome right now?

@sjmiles
Copy link
Contributor

sjmiles commented Feb 18, 2014

Works for me on both Chrome stable (32.0.1700.107) and Firefox 27 (both on
Windows). What OS are you using?

Re: Chrome, do you have any experimental flags turned on?

Re: Firefox, iirc version 23 is stale and Gecko has changed already. Try
with the latest version?

Fwiw, version numbers are embedded in polymer/polymer.js and
platform/platform.js between the license text and the code; you should have
version 0.2.0 of both.

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Scott Graham [email protected]:

wfm on chrome canary, maybe relies on > 32 chrome right now?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/423#issuecomment-35349373
.

@eseidel
Copy link
Author

eseidel commented Feb 18, 2014

Darwin 13.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.0.0: Thu Sep 19 22:22:27 PDT 2013; root:xnu-2422.1.72~6/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

/Applications/Google Chrome.app/Contents/MacOS/Google Chrome --no-startup-window --flag-switches-begin --enable-autologin --enable-experimental-web-platform-features --flag-switches-end

Crap. Looks like I have experimental-web-platform-features enabled for Stable on my personal machine. No clue when I turned that on.

@eseidel
Copy link
Author

eseidel commented Feb 18, 2014

Disabled --experimental-web-paltform-features and now it works fine in M32. Still broken in FF 27.0.1 which means I can't actually use this for the website I'm working on, but at least I can play with it in Chrome. :)

Thanks. Sorry for the noise.

@eseidel eseidel closed this as completed Feb 18, 2014
@eseidel
Copy link
Author

eseidel commented Feb 18, 2014

grep version bower_components/platform/platform.js bower_components/polymer/polymer.js
bower_components/platform/platform.js:// @Version: 0.2.0
bower_components/polymer/polymer.js:// @Version: 0.2.0

@eseidel
Copy link
Author

eseidel commented Feb 18, 2014

Now it's working fine in FF 27.0.1. So odd. I must have just been confused earlier. Again, apologies for the noise.

@sjmiles
Copy link
Contributor

sjmiles commented Feb 19, 2014

No worries about noise, we want/need to know where there are rough edges. Thanks for all the detailed info.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants