-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Components - signaturit #14855
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
New Components - signaturit #14855
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules and functionalities for the Signaturit integration, including the ability to create certified emails, send signature requests from templates, and send reminders for pending signature requests. It also adds constants and utility functions for better handling of data and events. Additionally, the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Signed Document Actions - Create Certified Email - Create Signature Request From Template - Send Signature Request Reminder
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
components/signaturit/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
35-51
: Optimize event emission to eliminate unnecessary array reversalThe
emitEvent
method accumulates items inresponseArray
and then reverses it before emitting events. This can be optimized by emitting each event as it's fetched and updating thelastDate
accordingly, eliminating the need to reverse the array.Apply this diff to optimize the event emission process:
- let responseArray = []; for await (const item of response) { if (Date.parse(item.created_at) <= lastDate) break; - responseArray.push(item); + this.$emit(item, { + id: item.id, + summary: `New signed document: ${item.id}`, + ts: Date.parse(item.created_at), + }); + if (!newLastDate || Date.parse(item.created_at) > newLastDate) { + newLastDate = Date.parse(item.created_at); + } } - if (responseArray.length) { - this._setLastDate(Date.parse(responseArray[0].created_at)); + if (newLastDate) { + this._setLastDate(newLastDate); } - for (const item of responseArray.reverse()) { - this.$emit(item, { - id: item.id, - summary: `New signed document: ${item.id}`, - ts: Date.parse(item.created_at), - }); - }components/signaturit/signaturit.app.mjs (1)
94-102
: Add error handling to API request methodThe
_makeRequest
method lacks error handling, which may lead to unhandled exceptions if the API request fails. Implementing error handling ensures robustness and better error reporting.Apply this diff to include error handling:
async _makeRequest({ $ = this, path, headers, ...opts }) { + try { return await axios($, { url: this._baseUrl() + path, headers: this._headers(headers), ...opts, }); + } catch (error) { + $.throw(error); + } },components/signaturit/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs (1)
213-218
: Potential confusion with re-declared variable 'k'The variable
k
is re-declared for indexing bothtemplates
andfiles
. While block scoping allows this, using distinct variable names improves readability and prevents potential mistakes.Consider renaming the second
k
variable:if (this.files) { - let k = 0; + let fileIndex = 0; for (const file of parseObject(this.files)) { - formData.append(`files[${k++}]`, fs.createReadStream(checkTmp(file))); + formData.append(`files[${fileIndex++}]`, fs.createReadStream(checkTmp(file))); } }components/signaturit/sources/new-signed-document/new-signed-document.mjs (1)
8-8
: Enhance description to match requirementsThe description should explicitly mention that events are emitted when documents reach 'completed' status, as specified in the requirements.
- description: "Emit new event when a document has been newly signed.", + description: "Emit new event when a document has been signed and reaches 'completed' status.",components/signaturit/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-24
: Consider adding safeguards for edge casesThe function handles basic JSON parsing scenarios but could benefit from additional safeguards:
- Add input validation
- Implement maximum depth for recursive parsing
- Handle circular references
- Consider logging parse errors for debugging
export const parseObject = (obj) => { + const MAX_DEPTH = 10; + const seen = new WeakSet(); + + const parse = (value, depth = 0) => { + if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) { + console.warn('Maximum parsing depth exceeded'); + return value; + } + + if (typeof value === 'object' && value !== null) { + if (seen.has(value)) { + console.warn('Circular reference detected'); + return '[Circular]'; + } + seen.add(value); + } + if (!obj) return undefined; if (Array.isArray(obj)) { return obj.map((item) => { if (typeof item === "string") { try { return JSON.parse(item); } catch (e) { + console.debug(`Failed to parse JSON: ${e.message}`); return item; } } return item; }); } if (typeof obj === "string") { try { return JSON.parse(obj); } catch (e) { + console.debug(`Failed to parse JSON: ${e.message}`); return obj; } } return obj; + }; + + return parse(obj); };components/signaturit/common/constants.mjs (2)
1-1
: Consider documenting the LIMIT constantAdd a comment explaining the purpose and source of this limit value (e.g., API pagination, performance considerations).
+// Maximum number of items to retrieve per API request export const LIMIT = 100;
3-16
: Enhance TYPE_OPTIONS documentationThe descriptions in labels contain markdown syntax (PDF) which might not render correctly in all UI contexts.
export const TYPE_OPTIONS = [ { label: "Delivery - Send the email as it is certifying the delivery process.", value: "delivery", }, { - label: "Open Document - Send a modified version of the email with a button that redirects the user to our platform to open the **PDF** attachments. With this method, you can track when the user opens the attached files. Note: This method only supports **PDF** documents to be attached.", + label: "Open Document - Send a modified version of the email with a button that redirects the user to our platform to open the PDF attachments. With this method, you can track when the user opens the attached files. Note: This method only supports PDF documents to be attached.", value: "open_document", }, { - label: "Open Every Document - This type works like the **Open Document** type but allows to track the opening of every **PDF** file in emails with multiple attachments.", + label: "Open Every Document - This type works like the Open Document type but allows to track the opening of every PDF file in emails with multiple attachments.", value: "open_every_document", }, ];
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
components/signaturit/.gitignore
(0 hunks)components/signaturit/actions/create-certified-email/create-certified-email.mjs
(1 hunks)components/signaturit/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs
(1 hunks)components/signaturit/actions/send-signature-request-reminder/send-signature-request-reminder.mjs
(1 hunks)components/signaturit/app/signaturit.app.ts
(0 hunks)components/signaturit/common/constants.mjs
(1 hunks)components/signaturit/common/utils.mjs
(1 hunks)components/signaturit/package.json
(1 hunks)components/signaturit/signaturit.app.mjs
(1 hunks)components/signaturit/sources/common/base.mjs
(1 hunks)components/signaturit/sources/new-signed-document/new-signed-document.mjs
(1 hunks)components/signaturit/sources/new-signed-document/test-event.mjs
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/signaturit/.gitignore
- components/signaturit/app/signaturit.app.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/signaturit/sources/new-signed-document/test-event.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/signaturit/actions/create-certified-email/create-certified-email.mjs (2)
103-107
:
Ensure secure handling of attachment file paths
When processing this.attachments
, it's crucial to validate and sanitize file paths to prevent path traversal vulnerabilities. Ensure that the checkTmp
function securely enforces that only files within the /tmp
directory are accessed.
Would you like assistance in reviewing the checkTmp
function for proper validation and suggesting security improvements?
78-86
:
Incorrect increment of recipient index 'i'
The variable i
is incremented after processing data
, which is unrelated to recipients. This may cause incorrect indexing of recipients in the form data.
Apply this diff to correct the indexing:
}
i++;
}
if (this.data) {
for (const [
key,
value,
] of Object.entries(this.data)) {
formData.append(`data[${key}]`, value);
}
- i++;
}
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
components/signaturit/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs (1)
187-190
: Ensure proper parsing and validation of custom data
When processing this.data
, ensure that the input is correctly parsed and validated. Improper handling may lead to unexpected errors or security vulnerabilities.
Would you like assistance in implementing robust validation for the custom data input?
components/signaturit/sources/new-signed-document/new-signed-document.mjs (1)
4-13
: LGTM! Component structure follows best practices
The component is well-structured with appropriate deduplication and version numbering for a new component.
components/signaturit/package.json (1)
3-3
: Verify package structure changes
The version bump to 0.1.0 and removal of the dist directory structure needs verification:
- Is this the first release? Consider starting with 0.0.1
- Confirm if the build process has been updated to handle the new file structure
Also applies to: 5-5
components/signaturit/actions/send-signature-request-reminder/send-signature-request-reminder.mjs (1)
3-26
: LGTM! Implementation matches requirements
The action is well-structured and implements the send-signature-request-reminder requirement as specified in the PR objectives.
components/signaturit/common/constants.mjs (1)
18-57
: Consider internationalization support
The constant definitions contain hardcoded English strings. Consider implementing i18n support for better global usability.
Consider restructuring the constants to support internationalization:
// Example approach using a translation key system
export const DELIVERY_TYPE_OPTIONS = [
{
labelKey: "delivery_type.email.label",
descriptionKey: "delivery_type.email.description",
value: "email",
},
// ... other options
];
// Separate translation files can then be maintained for different languages
Also, verify these options align with the latest Signaturit API documentation:
...it/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nents/signaturit/actions/send-signature-request-reminder/send-signature-request-reminder.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…mplate/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/signaturit/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs (1)
139-168
: Add error handling to transformArray methodThe method processes complex nested objects but lacks error handling for malformed input or circular references.
Consider adding error handling:
transformArray({ arr, prefixBase, formData, }) { + if (!Array.isArray(arr)) { + throw new Error(`Expected array for ${prefixBase}, got ${typeof arr}`); + } let result = []; function processObject(obj, prefix = "") { + if (!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') { + throw new Error(`Invalid object at ${prefix}`); + } for (let key in obj) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/signaturit/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/signaturit/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs (1)
14-20
: LGTM! Component metadata is well-defined
The component definition includes all necessary metadata and follows best practices with proper documentation links.
...it/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...it/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...it/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...it/actions/create-signature-request-from-template/create-signature-request-from-template.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just a couple minor comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Resolves #13223.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
.gitignore
file, allowing previously ignored files to be tracked.Documentation
package.json
to reflect new versioning and dependencies.Chores