Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Components] fal_ai - New action components #14545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

jcortes
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes commented Nov 4, 2024

WHY

Resolves #14480

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced actions for adding, canceling, retrieving responses, and checking the status of requests in the processing queue.
    • Enhanced the fal_ai component with new properties for configuration and methods for making HTTP requests.
  • Updates

    • Updated the version of the @pipedream/fal_ai component to 0.1.0 and added a dependency on @pipedream/platform.

These enhancements improve the application's capability to manage asynchronous tasks effectively.

@jcortes jcortes added the action New Action Request label Nov 4, 2024
@jcortes jcortes self-assigned this Nov 4, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 4, 2024

@jcortes is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 4, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 5, 2024 4:51pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several new action components to the fal_ai module, enhancing its ability to manage asynchronous tasks in a processing queue. The new components include actions for adding requests to the queue, canceling requests, retrieving request responses, and checking request statuses. Each component is structured with defined properties and methods, enabling interaction with a backend service via HTTP requests. The application component has also been updated to support these actions, including new properties and methods for making requests.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/fal_ai/actions/add-request-to-queue/add-request-to-queue.mjs New action component for adding requests to a queue, including addToQueue and run methods.
components/fal_ai/actions/cancel-request/cancel-request.mjs New action component for canceling requests, with cancelRequest and run methods.
components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-response/get-request-response.mjs New action component for retrieving responses of completed requests, featuring getRequestResponse and run methods.
components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-status/get-request-status.mjs New action component for managing request statuses, including getRequestStatus and run methods.
components/fal_ai/fal_ai.app.mjs Updated application component with new properties (appId, falWebhook, requestId, logs) and methods for HTTP requests.
components/fal_ai/package.json Updated version from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 and added dependency on @pipedream/platform.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add request to the queue for asynchronous processing (#14480)
Cancel a request in the queue (#14480)
Get the status of a request in the queue (#14480)
Get the response of a completed request in the queue (#14480)

Suggested reviewers

  • michelle0927

🐇 In the queue, requests do hop,
With a click, they never stop!
Cancel, get status, or reply,
Our actions soar, oh my, oh my!
From add to get, we leap and bound,
In the world of tasks, joy is found! 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
components/fal_ai/actions/cancel-request/cancel-request.mjs (1)

9-23: Consider adding validation for requestId.

While the props are well-structured, consider adding validation to ensure the requestId exists before attempting cancellation. This could prevent unnecessary API calls for non-existent requests.

 requestId: {
   propDefinition: [
     app,
     "requestId",
   ],
+  validate: (value) => {
+    if (!value?.trim()) {
+      throw new Error("Request ID is required for cancellation");
+    }
+    return value;
+  },
 },
components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-response/get-request-response.mjs (1)

34-50: Enhance response handling and success message

The current implementation could benefit from:

  1. More informative success messages including request details
  2. Response data validation before returning

Here's a suggested improvement:

 async run({ $ }) {
   const {
     getRequestResponse,
     appId,
     requestId,
   } = this;

+  let response;
+  try {
     const response = await getRequestResponse({
       $,
       appId,
       requestId,
     });
+    
+    // Validate response structure
+    if (!response || typeof response !== 'object') {
+      throw new Error('Invalid response format received');
+    }
+
+    $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved response for request ${requestId} from app ${appId}`);
+    return response;
+  } catch (error) {
+    $.export("$summary", `Failed to retrieve response: ${error.message}`);
+    throw error;
+  }
-    $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved the request response.");
-    return response;
 },
components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-status/get-request-status.mjs (2)

30-39: Consider adding input validation and explicit error handling.

While the method implementation is functional, it could be more robust with:

  1. Input validation for required parameters
  2. Explicit error handling for common failure scenarios

Consider this enhancement:

 methods: {
   getRequestStatus({
     appId, requestId, ...args
   } = {}) {
+    if (!appId || !requestId) {
+      throw new Error('Both appId and requestId are required parameters');
+    }
     return this.app._makeRequest({
       path: `/${appId}/requests/${requestId}/status`,
       ...args,
+    }).catch(error => {
+      if (error.response?.status === 404) {
+        throw new Error(`Request ${requestId} not found for app ${appId}`);
+      }
+      throw error;
     });
   },
 },

59-59: Enhance the summary message with status details.

The summary message could be more informative by including the actual status from the response.

Consider this enhancement:

-    $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved status for request ID \`${response.request_id}\`.`);
+    $.export("$summary", `Request ID \`${response.request_id}\` status: \`${response.status}\`.`);
components/fal_ai/fal_ai.app.mjs (2)

7-29: Consider generalizing the appId description.

The property definitions are well-structured, but the appId description could be more generic to avoid confusion.

-      description: "The unique identifier for the app. Eg. `lora`.",
+      description: "The unique identifier for your fal.ai application.",

31-40: Consider extracting the base URL as a constant.

For better maintainability and reusability, the base URL should be defined as a constant at the top of the file.

 import { axios } from "@pipedream/platform";
+
+const BASE_URL = "https://queue.fal.run/fal-ai";

 export default {
   // ...
   methods: {
     getUrl(path) {
-      return `https://queue.fal.run/fal-ai${path}`;
+      return `${BASE_URL}${path}`;
     },
components/fal_ai/actions/add-request-to-queue/add-request-to-queue.mjs (1)

17-25: Consider removing or generalizing the default data configuration.

The current default configuration is specific to a stable-diffusion use case. This might be misleading for users implementing different fal.ai models or workflows.

Consider this more generic default:

  default: {
-    model_name: "stabilityai/stable-diffusion-xl-base-1.0",
-    prompt: "Photo of a european medieval 40 year old queen, silver hair, highly detailed face, detailed eyes, head shot, intricate crown, age spots, wrinkles",
+    model_name: "",
+    prompt: ""
  },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 971c781 and d0068b5.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/add-request-to-queue/add-request-to-queue.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/cancel-request/cancel-request.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-response/get-request-response.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-status/get-request-status.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/fal_ai.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/package.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
components/fal_ai/package.json (2)

3-3: Version bump follows semantic versioning.

The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 appropriately reflects the addition of new action components as a minor feature release.


15-17: Dependencies are properly configured.

The addition of @pipedream/platform as a dependency is correct and necessary for implementing the HTTP requests required by the new action components.

Let's verify the dependency version is consistent with other components:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information to verify the dependency version consistency.

@pipedream/platform version 3.0.3 is consistent with several recently updated components

The version 3.0.3 used in fal_ai's package.json matches the version used in other recently updated components like:

  • moaform
  • hullo
  • vida
  • zenventory
  • wrike
    and several others.

While there are components using older versions (1.x, 2.x), this appears to be due to gradual migration rather than inconsistency, as newer and recently updated components consistently use version 3.0.3.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check @pipedream/platform versions across components
# Expected: Version 3.0.3 should be commonly used

# Search for @pipedream/platform dependency versions in other components
fd package.json --exec grep -l "@pipedream/platform" {} | xargs grep -A 1 "@pipedream/platform"

Length of output: 158915

components/fal_ai/actions/cancel-request/cancel-request.mjs (2)

1-8: LGTM! Well-structured component metadata.

The component follows best practices with clear naming, descriptive explanation, and proper versioning.


1-50: Verify integration with fal_ai app component.

Let's verify the implementation of the put method in the app component and ensure consistent error handling across all fal_ai components.

components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-response/get-request-response.mjs (1)

1-8: LGTM: Well-structured action metadata

The action metadata is well-defined with clear naming, description, and appropriate versioning for a new component.

components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-status/get-request-status.mjs (2)

1-8: LGTM! Component metadata is well-structured.

The component metadata is clear, descriptive, and follows proper naming conventions.


9-29: LGTM! Props are well-defined and consistent.

The props definition is complete and aligns with the component's purpose. All necessary fields for request status retrieval are included.

components/fal_ai/fal_ai.app.mjs (2)

1-6: LGTM: Import and app structure are well-defined.

The import of axios and basic app structure follow Pipedream's best practices.


31-33: Verify the API endpoint with fal.ai documentation.

Please ensure that queue.fal.run is the correct API endpoint for fal.ai's queue service.

components/fal_ai/actions/add-request-to-queue/add-request-to-queue.mjs (2)

1-8: LGTM! Clear metadata and proper versioning.

The module setup follows best practices with clear naming, descriptive documentation, and appropriate initial versioning.


17-25: Add input validation for the data object structure.

The data prop accepts any object structure without validation. This could lead to runtime errors if required fields are missing or malformed.

Consider adding schema validation. Let me check if there's a validation pattern used in other components:

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-status/get-request-status.mjs (1)

52-56: Consider more explicit boolean conversion for logs parameter.

The current implementation converts the boolean to 1 or undefined. While functional, consider using explicit boolean values for better clarity.

-        logs: logs
-          ? 1
-          : undefined,
+        logs: Boolean(logs),
components/fal_ai/fal_ai.app.mjs (2)

6-29: Consider clarifying the appId description format.

The description uses backticks around the example (lora), which might be confusing as it's not clear if the backticks should be included in the actual value.

-      description: "The unique identifier for the app. Eg. `lora`.",
+      description: "The unique identifier for the app. Example: lora",

31-33: Consider making the base URL configurable.

The base URL is currently hardcoded. Consider moving it to a configuration property or environment variable to make it more maintainable and flexible for different environments.

+  propDefinitions: {
+    baseUrl: {
+      type: "string",
+      label: "API Base URL",
+      description: "The base URL for the fal.ai API",
+      default: "https://queue.fal.run/fal-ai",
+    },
+  },
   methods: {
     getUrl(path) {
-      return `https://queue.fal.run/fal-ai${path}`;
+      return `${this.$auth.baseUrl || "https://queue.fal.run/fal-ai"}${path}`;
     },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0068b5 and bf69ca1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/add-request-to-queue/add-request-to-queue.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/cancel-request/cancel-request.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-response/get-request-response.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-status/get-request-status.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/fal_ai.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/add-request-to-queue/add-request-to-queue.mjs
  • components/fal_ai/actions/cancel-request/cancel-request.mjs
  • components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-response/get-request-response.mjs
  • components/fal_ai/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-status/get-request-status.mjs (3)

1-8: LGTM! Clear and well-structured component metadata.

The component metadata is well-defined with appropriate versioning and clear description.


9-29: LGTM! Props are well-structured and complete.

The props definition includes all necessary parameters for request status checking, properly leveraging propDefinitions from the app module.


59-59: LGTM! Clear success message.

The summary message clearly indicates the success state and includes the relevant request ID.

components/fal_ai/fal_ai.app.mjs (1)

1-5: LGTM! Basic setup is correct.

The import statement and app configuration are properly defined.

components/fal_ai/fal_ai.app.mjs Show resolved Hide resolved
michelle0927
michelle0927 previously approved these changes Nov 4, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, ready for QA!
FYI, components that make an asynchronous request or allow a callback URL are good opportunities to use Pipedream's $.flow.rerun as in:

@jcortes
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jcortes commented Nov 5, 2024

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-status/get-request-status.mjs (1)

49-49: Add null check for response status in summary message.

The template literal assumes response.status is defined. Add a null check to handle potential undefined values.

-    $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved status as \`${response.status}\`.`);
+    $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved status as \`${response.status ?? 'unknown'}\`.`);
components/fal_ai/actions/add-request-to-queue/add-request-to-queue.mjs (2)

21-24: Consider using a more generic default prompt in the data property.

The detailed default prompt may not be relevant to all users. Providing a generic placeholder encourages users to input their own prompt.

Apply this diff to adjust the default data:

21       default: {
22         model_name: "stabilityai/stable-diffusion-xl-base-1.0",
-23         prompt: "Photo of a european medieval 40 year old queen, silver hair, highly detailed face, detailed eyes, head shot, intricate crown, age spots, wrinkles",
+23         prompt: "Enter your prompt here",
24       },

38-44: Add a default value to reRunTimeoutInSecs for clarity.

Specifying a default value in the property definition helps users understand the default behavior without checking the code.

Apply this diff to add the default value:

38       reRunTimeoutInSecs: {
39         type: "integer",
40         label: "Rerun Timeout",
41         description: "The time in seconds to wait before rerunning the step to retrieve the request response. E.g., `30`. [See the documentation](https://pipedream.com/docs/code/nodejs/rerun/#flowrerun).",
42         optional: true,
43         min: 10,
+44         default: 10,
44       },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf69ca1 and 1bbcf96.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/add-request-to-queue/add-request-to-queue.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/cancel-request/cancel-request.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-response/get-request-response.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-status/get-request-status.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/fal_ai.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/fal_ai/package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • components/fal_ai/actions/cancel-request/cancel-request.mjs
  • components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-response/get-request-response.mjs
  • components/fal_ai/fal_ai.app.mjs
  • components/fal_ai/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/fal_ai/actions/get-request-status/get-request-status.mjs (3)

1-8: LGTM! Component metadata is well-structured.

The component follows Pipedream's standard structure with clear metadata and documentation link.


9-29: LGTM! Props are well-defined and properly referenced.

The props structure aligns with the component's purpose and follows Pipedream's conventions.


31-36: Fix potential 'this' binding issue in destructuring.

Destructuring methods from this can lead to loss of context. Consider using direct method calls instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
action New Action Request
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] fal_ai
2 participants