-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Slack - Send Block Kit Message #14461
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughA new module named Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs (1)
12-28
: Consider documenting the conversation prop and reviewing prop order.
Two suggestions for improvement:
- The conversation prop could benefit from additional documentation about expected values and usage.
- The spread operators at the end might override explicitly defined props. Consider moving them before specific prop definitions.
Apply this diff to improve the props structure:
props: {
+ ...common.props,
+ ...buildBlocks.props,
slack: common.props.slack,
conversation: {
propDefinition: [
common.props.slack,
"conversation",
],
+ description: "Select the target conversation (channel, group, or user) where the message will be sent.",
},
text: {
type: "string",
label: "Notification Text",
description: "Optionally provide a string for Slack to display as the new message notification (if you do not provide this, notification will be blank).",
optional: true,
},
- ...common.props,
- ...buildBlocks.props,
},
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/slack/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/slack/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs (3)
1-3
: LGTM! Clean and clear imports.
The imports are well-organized and appropriately named, importing the necessary base functionalities from common modules.
7-9
: Implementation aligns well with PR objectives.
The action's name and description effectively address the discoverability issues mentioned in the PR objectives. The inclusion of the Block Kit Builder documentation link provides additional value for users.
4-11
: Verify property inheritance from common modules.
While spreading properties from common modules is a good practice for code reuse, we should ensure no critical properties are accidentally overridden.
✅ Verification successful
No property conflicts found between common modules
After analyzing the common modules, there are no conflicting properties between send-message.mjs
and build-blocks.mjs
. The modules have distinct responsibilities:
send-message.mjs
provides basic Slack messaging props (slack app instance, as_user, post_at)build-blocks.mjs
adds Block Kit specific configuration props (passArrayOrConfigure)
The spread operator usage in the original code is safe and follows good practices for property inheritance.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential property conflicts between common modules
# Test: Look for exported properties in common modules
echo "Checking common/send-message.mjs exports:"
rg "export default" -A 10 "../common/send-message.mjs"
echo "\nChecking common/build-blocks.mjs exports:"
rg "export default" -A 10 "../common/build-blocks.mjs"
Length of output: 433
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the correct paths for these common modules
echo "Finding common module paths:"
fd "send-message.mjs|build-blocks.mjs" --type f
echo "\nChecking content of found files:"
fd "send-message.mjs|build-blocks.mjs" --type f --exec rg "export default" -A 10 {}
Length of output: 14116
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific content of the Slack common modules we found
echo "Checking content of slack/actions/common/send-message.mjs:"
rg "export default" -B 5 -A 10 "components/slack/actions/common/send-message.mjs"
echo "\nChecking content of slack/actions/common/build-blocks.mjs:"
rg "export default" -B 5 -A 10 "components/slack/actions/common/build-blocks.mjs"
Length of output: 1120
components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just left one minor comment regarding the version
key: "slack-send-block-kit-message", | ||
name: "Build and Send a Block Kit Message", | ||
description: "Configure custom blocks and send to a channel, group, or user. [See the documentation](https://api.slack.com/tools/block-kit-builder).", | ||
version: "0.4.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should probably be 0.0.1
if it's new
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's an action that existed previously, but was removed. I've encountered issues with republishing components at version 0.0.1
if they were previously published at a higher version. Since this one was at 0.3.3
when it was removed, I decided to use 0.4.0
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Gotcha!
/approve |
Resolves #14459
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Version Updates