Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gainsight NXT new components #14453
Gainsight NXT new components #14453
Changes from 11 commits
c3a469c
2acaeab
17909da
d99b6c6
0d15f59
7770034
87ccc95
9b34452
c5a99d4
3c548be
361a527
d840820
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing error handling and type safety.
While the function provides basic JSON parsing with fallback, consider these improvements for better robustness:
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add defensive programming measures.
The function needs better error handling and input validation to prevent runtime errors:
JSON.parse
call could throw on invalid JSONApply these improvements:
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
Remove the objectType filter to support all valid object types
The current implementation filters objects by
objectType === "CUSTOM"
, but the API endpoints show that the integration handles various object types including built-in ones like "Company". The filter should be removed as it may exclude valid objects that can be operated on through the/data/objects/{objectName}
endpoints.data?.filter?.((obj) => obj.objectType === "CUSTOM")
data?.map(({label, objectName}) => ({label, value: objectName}))
🔗 Analysis chain
Reconsider the custom object type filter
Based on the previous discussion, several custom object types may not be explicitly classified as "CUSTOM", which could result in missing valid objects. Consider either:
Let's verify the object types:
Let me search for more specific information about Gainsight NXT's object types.
Let me check the API implementation and any test files that might reveal the expected object types.
Let me fix the regex and try again.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 17301
Script:
Length of output: 534
Script:
Length of output: 210
Script:
Length of output: 3201
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add path parameter validation in _makeRequest
The
path
parameter is directly concatenated with the base URL, which could lead to path traversal issues. Consider adding validation to ensure the path:Add path validation:
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add retry logic for company operations
The company creation/update methods could benefit from retry logic with exponential backoff for transient failures.
Consider implementing a retry wrapper: