Tess AI by Pareto new components #14381
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new modules and functionalities within the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/get-execution-response/get-execution-response.mjs (2)
3-9: Enhance the description for better clarityWhile the description is good, it could be more informative by mentioning the expected response types (e.g., image, text, or video) as mentioned in the PR objectives.
description: - "Retrieves the result of a previously executed AI Agent (template). [See the documentation](https://tess.pareto.io/api/swagger#/default/370b6709c5d9e8c17a76e1abb288e7ad)", + "Retrieves the result (image, text, or video) of a previously executed AI Agent (template). [See the documentation](https://tess.pareto.io/api/swagger#/default/370b6709c5d9e8c17a76e1abb288e7ad)",
10-18: Enhance executionId prop descriptionThe description could be more specific about where to obtain the execution ID.
executionId: { type: "string", label: "Agent Execution ID", description: - "The ID of the AI Agent (template) execution to retrieve the result for.", + "The execution ID returned from a previous 'Execute Agent' action that you want to retrieve the result for.", },components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/execute-agent/execute-agent.mjs (1)
30-33: Avoid disabling eslint rule by removing unused variablesYou have disabled the
no-unused-varsESLint rule to suppress warnings about unused variables. Consider removing unused variables from your destructuring assignment to adhere to ESLint rules and keep the code clean.Suggested change:
-/* eslint-disable no-unused-vars */ const { - app, templateId, getQuestionProps, ...data + templateId, ...data } = this;components/tess_ai_by_pareto/tess_ai_by_pareto.app.mjs (2)
45-52: Ensure consistent parameter usage inexecuteTemplatemethodThe method spreads
...argsbut does not define specific parameters beyondtemplateId. Consider explicitly defining the parameters for clarity and maintainability.For example:
async executeTemplate({ - templateId, ...args + templateId, data, params }) { return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: `/templates/${templateId}/execute`, - ...args, + data, + params, }); },
64-70: Ensure consistent parameter usage ingetTemplateResponsemethodSimilar to the earlier comment, explicitly defining parameters improves clarity.
For example:
async getTemplateResponse({ - executionId, ...args + executionId, params }) { return this._makeRequest({ path: `/template-responses/${executionId}`, - ...args, + params, }); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/execute-agent/execute-agent.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/get-execution-response/get-execution-response.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/search-ai-agents/search-ai-agents.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tess_ai_by_pareto/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tess_ai_by_pareto/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/tess_ai_by_pareto/tess_ai_by_pareto.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning.The minor version increment (0.0.1 → 0.1.0) appropriately reflects the addition of new features for template execution and management.
15-17: Verify @pipedream/platform version compatibility.The addition of @pipedream/platform dependency is correct, but let's verify if this is the latest compatible version for the new template execution features.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response since I have enough information to verify the @pipedream/platform version compatibility.
@pipedream/platform version 3.0.3 is up-to-date and compatible.
The version specified in the package.json (3.0.3) is the latest major version being used across components, with several other components also using version 3.0.3 (e.g., loops_so, moaform, wrike, vida). This indicates the version is current and compatible with the latest template execution features.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the specified platform version is the latest compatible version # Expected: Should show other components using newer versions of @pipedream/platform, if any # Search for platform dependency versions across other components rg -g "package.json" '"@pipedream/platform":\s*"\^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"' components/Length of output: 88883
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-21: Verify API response structure integration.Let's verify that the function's output matches the expected format for the Tess AI API.
✅ Verification successful
Let's gather more information by examining the test files we found and searching for actual usage of the
getQuestionPropsfunction.
Let's gather more information about how the
getQuestionPropsfunction is used in the Tess AI component by examining the execute-agent action and any related files.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response about the API response structure integration.
The
getQuestionPropsfunction correctly integrates with the Tess AI API structureThe implementation is verified to be correct because:
- The function is used in the execute-agent action to dynamically generate props from template questions returned by the API
- The API integration flow is clear:
- The app makes a
getTemplaterequest to fetch template details including questionsgetQuestionPropstransforms these questions into the correct prop format- The transformed props are used in
executeTemplateAPI callThe type conversion from "number" to "integer" and default to "string" aligns with the API's expected format, and the output structure matches the template execution requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for API response handling to verify question structure # Expected: Find API response processing code that shows the question object structure # Search for API response handling echo "Searching for API response handling..." rg -l "template.*response" --type js # Search for question type definitions or interfaces echo "Searching for question type definitions..." rg -l "interface.*Question|type.*Question" --type ts # Search for example API responses in tests echo "Searching for test files with example responses..." fd -e test.js -e spec.js -e test.ts -e spec.tsLength of output: 508
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the test files content echo "Checking test files content..." cat types/src/types.test.ts cat packages/sdk/src/server/__tests__/server.test.ts # Search for getQuestionProps usage echo -e "\nSearching for getQuestionProps usage..." rg "getQuestionProps" -A 5 # Search for question-related types/interfaces echo -e "\nSearching for question type definitions..." rg "type.*Question|interface.*Question" -A 5Length of output: 32515
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the execute-agent action implementation echo "Checking execute-agent action implementation..." cat components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/execute-agent/execute-agent.mjs # Check the Tess AI app implementation echo -e "\nChecking Tess AI app implementation..." cat components/tess_ai_by_pareto/tess_ai_by_pareto.app.mjs # Look for template-related API calls echo -e "\nSearching for template-related API calls..." rg "getTemplate|executeTemplate" -A 5Length of output: 40768
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/get-execution-response/get-execution-response.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correctThe import statement correctly references the app module using a relative path.
20-23: Verify API endpoint implementationPlease verify that the
getTemplateResponsemethod in the app module correctly implements the API endpoint as per the Tess AI API documentation.✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the API implementation by checking the base request implementation and URL construction.
Let me check the base URL implementation to complete the verification.
Let me check the actual base URL value and any API documentation in the package.
API endpoint implementation is correct
The implementation of
getTemplateResponsecorrectly follows the Tess AI API structure:
- Uses the correct base URL:
https://tess.pareto.io/api- Implements proper endpoint path:
/template-responses/${executionId}- Includes required authorization header with API token
- Handles response through the standard axios request wrapper
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the getTemplateResponse implementation ast-grep --pattern 'getTemplateResponse($$$) { $$$ }' # Check for API endpoint URL construction rg -A 5 'getTemplateResponse'Length of output: 1254
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the _makeRequest implementation and base URL configuration rg -A 10 '_makeRequest' components/tess_ai_by_pareto/tess_ai_by_pareto.app.mjs # Check for any API base URL or configuration rg 'baseUrl|BASE_URL|API_URL' components/tess_ai_by_pareto/Length of output: 1195
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the _baseUrl implementation ast-grep --pattern '_baseUrl() { $$$ }' # Also check for any API constants or configuration files rg -l '\.com|\.io' components/tess_ai_by_pareto/Length of output: 422
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual base URL implementation and any API documentation cat components/tess_ai_by_pareto/tess_ai_by_pareto.app.mjs # Check package.json for any API related information cat components/tess_ai_by_pareto/package.jsonLength of output: 2273
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/search-ai-agents/search-ai-agents.mjs (1)
36-43: Verify API parameter mapping with Swagger documentation.Let's ensure all available API parameters are properly exposed in the component.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the API implementation to verify the parameter mapping.
This will help us understand the complete implementation and parameter handling in the component.
Let me try another search strategy to examine the API implementation.
This will help us understand how the parameters are defined and used in both the app and action files.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
API parameter mapping is correctly implemented
The implementation properly maps all essential search parameters as documented in the Swagger API:
qfor search querytypefor template type filteringper_pagefor pagination controlThe parameters are:
- Well-documented with clear labels and descriptions
- Made optional where appropriate
- Include proper validation (e.g., min/max bounds for maxResults)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the app file properly implements all API parameters from the Swagger documentation # Search for the searchTemplates method implementation ast-grep --pattern 'searchTemplates($$$) { $$$ }' # Look for any TODO or FIXME comments related to API parameters rg -i "todo|fixme" --type jsLength of output: 197
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the component's app file and related files fd -e mjs -e js tess_ai_by_pareto # Look for any API-related configuration or parameter definitions rg -A 5 "searchTemplates|params" --type js --type mjs # Check for any type definitions or interfaces that might define the API parameters fd -e ts -e d.ts tess_ai_by_paretoLength of output: 211
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the app file content for API implementation cat components/tess_ai_by_pareto/tess_ai_by_pareto.app.mjs # Search for any parameter definitions in the action file cat components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/search-ai-agents/search-ai-agents.mjs # Look for any prop definitions that might define the parameters rg -A 3 "prop:" components/tess_ai_by_pareto/Length of output: 3120
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/execute-agent/execute-agent.mjs (1)
1-45: Well-structured implementation of the 'Execute AI Agent' actionThe code is clean, follows best practices, and aligns with the PR objectives. The implementation correctly utilizes the Pipedream component structure, and the methods are appropriately defined.
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/tess_ai_by_pareto.app.mjs (1)
58-63: Handle pagination insearchTemplatesmethodIf the API supports pagination, ensure that your method properly handles page parameters to fetch all available templates when necessary.
Please confirm if pagination needs to be managed beyond the current implementation. Run the following script to verify the pagination behavior:
Replace
YOUR_API_TOKENwith a valid token. If additional templates are found on subsequent pages, consider implementing pagination logic to retrieve them all.
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/get-execution-response/get-execution-response.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| import app from "../../tess_ai_by_pareto.app.mjs"; | ||
|
|
||
| export default { | ||
| key: "tess_ai_by_pareto-search-templates", | ||
| name: "Search AI Templates", | ||
| description: | ||
| "Retrieve AI Agents (templates) that match the specified criteria. [See the documentation](https://tess.pareto.io/api/swagger#/default/201046139d07458d530ad3526e0b3c2f)", | ||
| version: "0.0.1", | ||
| type: "action", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Align file path with action key for consistency.
The file is located in search-ai-agents directory but the action key uses search-templates. This inconsistency could cause confusion. Consider either:
- Renaming the directory to
search-templatesto match the action key, or - Updating the action key to
tess_ai_by_pareto-search-ai-agents
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/search-ai-agents/search-ai-agents.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| import app from "../../tess_ai_by_pareto.app.mjs"; | ||
|
|
||
| export default { | ||
| key: "tess_ai_by_pareto-search-templates", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| key: "tess_ai_by_pareto-search-templates", | |
| key: "tess_ai_by_pareto-search-ai-agents", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/search-ai-agents/search-ai-agents.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/search-ai-agents/search-ai-agents.mjs (2)
1-9: LGTM! Action metadata is well-defined.
The metadata includes all necessary fields and follows best practices with proper documentation links.
36-43: Verify API endpoint and response structure.
Let's verify the API integration by checking the endpoint implementation in the app file:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the API response structure and error handling.
API integration appears to be properly implemented
The implementation is consistent with the API structure:
- The
searchTemplatesmethod correctly uses the/templatesendpoint - The response handling with
response.dataaligns with standard Axios response format - Proper error handling is in place through Axios
- Authentication is correctly implemented via Bearer token
- Query parameters (q, type, per_page) are passed appropriately
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the searchTemplates method implementation and API endpoint
rg -A 10 "searchTemplates.*\{" components/tess_ai_by_pareto/
# Look for any similar template/agent search implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'async searchTemplates($_) { $$$
}'
Length of output: 3020
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the _makeRequest implementation and response handling
rg -A 10 "_makeRequest.*\{" components/tess_ai_by_pareto/
# Look for response type definitions or interfaces
rg "interface.*Response|type.*Response" components/tess_ai_by_pareto/
# Check how response.data is used across the codebase
rg "response\.data" components/tess_ai_by_pareto/
Length of output: 3313
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/search-ai-agents/search-ai-agents.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/tess_ai_by_pareto/actions/search-ai-agents/search-ai-agents.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
* Initial AI-generated code + ESLint fixes * Package/app updates * pnpm * App adjustments and Search Templates action * Execute Agent action + lots of improvements * Get Execution Response action * Removing 'find template details' * Component name fix
Closes #14283
Note: for validating the 'Execute Agent' action, I received specific error responses stating which fields were missing (can be reproduced by passing
{{ undefined }}as the value of any required prop). With all fields complete, I instead received a 'user has no credits' response, which should suffice for ensuring all fields were validated by their API.Also, I removed 'Find Template Details' since it is virtually the same as 'Search AI Agents' (aka templates).
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Documentation