-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HypeAuditor new components #14350
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
HypeAuditor new components #14350
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughNew modules have been introduced in the HypeAuditor application for generating reports for TikTok, Twitch, and YouTube. Each module includes an action with metadata and an asynchronous Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
components/hypeauditor/actions/get-twitch-report/get-twitch-report.mjs (4)
3-8
: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The metadata for the "Get Twitch Report" action is complete and follows the expected structure. The description is clear and includes a helpful link to the API documentation.
For future updates, consider incrementing the version number (e.g., to "0.0.2") when making changes to this action.
9-17
: Props definition looks good, but consider adding optional properties.The props definition for 'hypeauditor' and 'channel' is correct and uses the propDefinition from the hypeauditor app, which is a good practice.
Consider adding optional properties that allow users to customize the report, such as specific metrics or date ranges, if supported by the HypeAuditor API. This would provide more flexibility for users when generating Twitch reports.
18-28
: Run method implementation is correct, but could be enhanced.The run method correctly implements the Twitch report generation using the HypeAuditor API. It follows the expected pattern for Pipedream actions.
Consider the following enhancements:
- Implement explicit error handling to provide more informative error messages to users.
- Enhance the summary message to include key information from the generated report, giving users more immediate insight into the results.
Example implementation:
async run({ $ }) { const { hypeauditor, ...params } = this; try { const response = await hypeauditor.getTwitchReport({ $, params, }); // Assuming the response contains a 'followers' field $.export("$summary", `Successfully fetched Twitch report for channel ${this.channel}. The channel has ${response.followers} followers.`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to fetch Twitch report for channel ${this.channel}`); throw new Error(`Error fetching Twitch report: ${error.message}`); } }
1-29
: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectives.The "Get Twitch Report" action is well-implemented and meets the objectives outlined in the PR description and linked issue. It provides the functionality to generate a Twitch report for a specified channel using the HypeAuditor API.
Key points:
- The action metadata and structure follow Pipedream's conventions.
- The implementation is consistent with the expected functionality.
- The code is clean and easy to understand.
While the current implementation is good, consider the suggestions provided in previous comments to further enhance the action's robustness and user-friendliness.
As you implement similar actions for YouTube and TikTok reports, ensure consistency in the structure and error handling across all HypeAuditor actions. This will provide a unified experience for users working with different social media platforms through your integration.
components/hypeauditor/actions/get-tiktok-report/get-tiktok-report.mjs (1)
3-8
: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The metadata for the TikTok report action is correctly defined and aligns with the PR objectives. The inclusion of the documentation link in the description is helpful.
Consider expanding the description to briefly mention what kind of information the TikTok report provides, e.g., "Generates a comprehensive TikTok report for a specified channel, including insights on content, followers, and engagement."
components/hypeauditor/actions/get-youtube-report/get-youtube-report.mjs (1)
24-34
: LGTM with suggestions: Run method is well-implemented.The
run
method is correctly implemented and follows best practices:
- It uses async/await for handling asynchronous operations.
- It destructures the
hypeauditor
object and other params for better readability.- It provides a summary message and returns the API response.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding error handling to catch and handle potential API errors.
- The summary message could include more details about the fetched report, such as the number of features included.
Here's an example of how you could implement these suggestions:
async run({ $ }) { const { hypeauditor, channel, features, } = this; try { const response = await hypeauditor.getYouTubeReport({ $, params: { channel, features }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully fetched YouTube report for channel ${channel} with ${features.length} features`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to fetch YouTube report for channel ${channel}`); throw error; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- components/hypeauditor/actions/get-tiktok-report/get-tiktok-report.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/hypeauditor/actions/get-twitch-report/get-twitch-report.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/hypeauditor/actions/get-youtube-report/get-youtube-report.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/hypeauditor/hypeauditor.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/hypeauditor/package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (12)
components/hypeauditor/package.json (2)
15-17
: LGTM: Addition of @pipedream/platform dependencyThe addition of the "@pipedream/platform" dependency is appropriate for a Pipedream component. The version constraint "^3.0.3" allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice.
3-3
: Verify the appropriateness of the version bumpThe version has been updated from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0, which is a minor version bump. This typically indicates new features added in a backwards-compatible manner, which aligns with the addition of new HypeAuditor components.
Please confirm that this version bump follows the project's versioning conventions and accurately reflects the scope of changes in this PR.
components/hypeauditor/actions/get-twitch-report/get-twitch-report.mjs (1)
1-1
: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement is properly structured and imports the necessary
hypeauditor
module.components/hypeauditor/actions/get-tiktok-report/get-tiktok-report.mjs (4)
1-1
: LGTM: Import statement is correct and necessary.The import of the
hypeauditor
module is appropriate for this action file.
1-29
: Overall, the TikTok report action is well-implemented with room for minor improvements.The implementation of the TikTok report action aligns well with the PR objectives. It correctly integrates with the HypeAuditor app and provides the necessary functionality to generate a TikTok report.
Key strengths:
- Proper structure and metadata definition
- Correct use of the HypeAuditor instance
- Provision of a summary message for user feedback
Suggested improvements:
- Expand the action description for clarity
- Add validation for required fields (channel ID or username)
- Implement error handling in the run method
- Support optional properties as mentioned in the API documentation
These improvements will enhance the robustness and flexibility of the action. Once these are addressed, the implementation will be fully aligned with the PR objectives and best practices.
18-28
: Run method is well-implemented, but consider adding error handling and optional properties.The asynchronous run method correctly uses the HypeAuditor instance to fetch the TikTok report and provides a summary message.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling to catch and report any issues during the API call:
try { const response = await hypeauditor.getTikTokReport({ $, params, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully fetched TikTok report for channel ${this.channel}`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to fetch TikTok report: ${error.message}`); throw error; }
- Include optional properties in the
params
object, as mentioned in the PR objectives:const { hypeauditor, channel, ...optionalProps } = this; const params = { channel, ...optionalProps, };Let's verify if the
getTikTokReport
method in the HypeAuditor app file supports optional properties:
9-17
: Props are well-defined, but consider adding validation.The props for the action are correctly defined, with the
channel
prop appropriately referencing thetiktokChannel
property from the HypeAuditor app.Consider adding validation to ensure that either the channel ID or username is provided, as mentioned in the PR objectives. This could be done by modifying the
tiktokChannel
propDefinition in the HypeAuditor app file.Let's verify the
tiktokChannel
propDefinition in the HypeAuditor app file:components/hypeauditor/actions/get-youtube-report/get-youtube-report.mjs (4)
1-1
: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement for the
hypeauditor
object is properly implemented.
3-8
: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata is comprehensive and follows the expected format for a Pipedream action. The description provides useful information and includes a link to the documentation, which is helpful for users.
9-23
: LGTM: Props are well-defined and align with requirements.The props section is correctly implemented:
- It includes the necessary inputs for generating a YouTube report (channel and features).
- It uses
propDefinition
to reference definitions from thehypeauditor
object, which is a good practice for maintaining consistency and reusability.
1-35
: Overall: Well-implemented YouTube report action.The implementation of the YouTube report action is solid and aligns well with the PR objectives and Pipedream's expected format. It correctly handles the required inputs (channel and features) and interacts with the HypeAuditor API to fetch the report.
Key strengths:
- Clear and concise action metadata
- Proper use of
propDefinition
for maintaining consistency- Asynchronous
run
method with appropriate parameter handlingWhile the current implementation is approved, consider the previously suggested improvements to enhance error handling and provide more detailed user feedback in the summary message.
components/hypeauditor/hypeauditor.app.mjs (1)
46-62
: New report methods are implemented correctly.The methods
getYouTubeReport
,getTikTokReport
, andgetTwitchReport
are correctly implemented, calling_makeRequest
with the appropriate paths and options. The implementation aligns with the API structure as documented.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Closes #13275
Note: I am unable to validate these due to the requirement of a paid account (and requesting a demo requires booking a call). I've validated that each action sends the proper request in the documented API structure.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores