[Components] smslink_nc #14261
[Components] smslink_nc #14261
Conversation
|
@jcortes is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces multiple new modules and functionalities to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
jcortes
force-pushed
the
smslink-nc-new-components
branch
from
d6497c5
to
9f11c45
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-sms-campaign/delete-sms-campaign.mjs (1)
1-17: LGTM! Consider enhancing the action description.The imports and action configuration look good. The props are correctly defined, and the overall structure is appropriate for a new action.
Consider adding more details to the description, such as mentioning potential use cases or any important considerations when deleting an SMS campaign. This can help users better understand the action's purpose and implications.
components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-contact/delete-contact.mjs (4)
9-27: LGTM: Props are well-defined, with a minor suggestion.The props definition is comprehensive and aligns with the action's purpose. The phoneNumber prop uses a propDefinition with a mapper function, which is a good approach for providing a user-friendly selection of contacts.
Consider adding input validation for the phone number format in the mapper function or in the
runmethod to ensure the provided phone number is valid before making the API call.
28-35: LGTM: deleteContact method is well-implemented, with a suggestion for improvement.The deleteContact method is correctly implemented, using the app instance to make the delete request. The use of the spread operator for additional arguments provides good flexibility.
Consider adding error handling within this method to catch and handle potential API errors. This could improve the robustness of the action. For example:
deleteContact(args = {}) { return this.app.delete({ path: "/contact", ...args, }).catch(error => { throw new Error(`Failed to delete contact: ${error.message}`); }); },
36-52: LGTM: run method is functional, with suggestions for improvement.The run method correctly implements the delete contact functionality. The use of async/await and the structure of the API call are appropriate.
Consider implementing the following improvements:
- Add error handling to catch and process potential API errors:
try { const response = await deleteContact({ $, data: { phone_numbers: [phoneNumber], }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully deleted contact."); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to delete contact: ${error.message}`); throw error; }
- Add input validation for the phoneNumber before making the API call:
if (!phoneNumber || !/^\+?[1-9]\d{1,14}$/.test(phoneNumber)) { throw new Error("Invalid phone number format"); }These changes will improve the robustness and reliability of the action.
1-53: Overall implementation is solid, with room for enhancement.The "Delete Contact" action is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. The code structure is clean, and it follows good practices in terms of modularity and readability.
To further improve the robustness and reliability of this action, consider implementing the following enhancements:
- Add input validation for the phone number format.
- Implement error handling in both the
deleteContactandrunmethods.- Provide more detailed error messages and summaries to improve debugging and user feedback.
These improvements will make the action more resilient to potential issues and provide a better developer experience.
As this is part of a larger system for managing SMS campaigns and contacts, ensure that this delete action is properly integrated with other parts of the system. For example, consider whether deleting a contact should also remove them from any active campaigns, and if so, implement this logic or create a separate action for it.
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1)
9-52: Consider improving custom parameter descriptions.The props are well-defined, but the custom parameters (param1, param2, param3) could benefit from more specific labels and descriptions. This would help users understand their purpose and how to use them effectively.
Consider updating the custom parameter props as follows:
param1: { type: "string", - label: "Param 1", - description: "Custom parameter 1.", + label: "Custom Field 1", + description: "Additional custom field for contact information.", optional: true, }, param2: { type: "string", - label: "Param 2", - description: "Custom parameter 2.", + label: "Custom Field 2", + description: "Additional custom field for contact information.", optional: true, }, param3: { type: "string", - label: "Param 3", - description: "Custom parameter 3.", + label: "Custom Field 3", + description: "Additional custom field for contact information.", optional: true, },components/smslink_nc/actions/create-sms-campaign/create-sms-campaign.mjs (3)
28-32: Mark 'autoOptimizeText' property as optional for consistencyCurrently,
autoOptimizeTextis not marked as optional, whereas other boolean properties likeautoRemoveBlocklistedNumbersandtestare optional. IfautoOptimizeTextis intended to be optional, consider addingoptional: trueto maintain consistency across your properties.
83-91: Separate methods and properties in destructuring for clarityIn the
runmethod, you're destructuring both methods and properties fromthis. For improved readability, consider separating methods from properties when destructuring. This helps in quickly identifying what are methods and what are properties.Apply this diff to separate methods and properties:
async run({ $ }) { - const { - createCampaign, - title, - sender, - text, - autoOptimizeText, - autoRemoveBlocklistedNumbers, - purpose, - test, - recipients, - } = this; + const { createCampaign } = this; + const { + title, + sender, + text, + autoOptimizeText, + autoRemoveBlocklistedNumbers, + purpose, + test, + recipients, + } = this;
74-78: Specify HTTP method explicitly in API requestIn the
createCampaignmethod, consider specifying the HTTP method explicitly for clarity and maintainability, even ifpostis the default method in your app's client.Apply this diff to include the
methodproperty:createCampaign(args = {}) { return this.app.post({ + method: "POST", path: "/sms-campaign", ...args, }); },
🛑 Comments failed to post (12)
components/smslink_nc/common/utils.mjs (1)
3-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing error handling and improving the error message.
The
parseArrayfunction handles various input types well, but there are two areas for potential improvement:
Explicit handling of non-string, non-array inputs: Currently, these will be passed to
JSON.parse, which may not be the intended behavior.The error message could be more specific about the accepted input types.
Consider applying the following changes:
function parseArray(value) { try { if (!value) { return []; } if (Array.isArray(value)) { return value; } + if (typeof value !== 'string') { + throw new Error("Input is neither an array nor a string"); + } + const parsedValue = JSON.parse(value); if (!Array.isArray(parsedValue)) { throw new Error("Not an array"); } return parsedValue; } catch (e) { - throw new ConfigurationError("Make sure the custom expression contains a valid array object"); + throw new ConfigurationError("Input must be a valid JSON array string or an array object"); } }These changes will:
- Explicitly handle non-string, non-array inputs.
- Provide a more informative error message about the expected input types.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.function parseArray(value) { try { if (!value) { return []; } if (Array.isArray(value)) { return value; } if (typeof value !== 'string') { throw new Error("Input is neither an array nor a string"); } const parsedValue = JSON.parse(value); if (!Array.isArray(parsedValue)) { throw new Error("Not an array"); } return parsedValue; } catch (e) { throw new ConfigurationError("Input must be a valid JSON array string or an array object"); } }components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-sms-campaign/delete-sms-campaign.mjs (1)
28-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueFix typo and improve error handling in the run method.
The run method implementation is generally correct, but there are two issues to address:
- There's a typo in the success property of the returned object.
- The method doesn't handle potential errors from the API call.
Fix the typo in the success property:
return { - sucess: true, + success: true, };Improve error handling by wrapping the API call in a try-catch block:
async run({ $ }) { const { deleteCampaign, campaignId, } = this; try { await deleteCampaign({ $, campaignId, params: { by: "id", }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully deleted SMS campaign."); return { success: true, }; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to delete SMS campaign: ${error.message}`); throw error; } }This change will provide more informative error messages and ensure that failures are properly communicated to the user.
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (2)
1-92: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding input validation for required fields.
The overall structure of the action is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. However, it would be beneficial to add input validation for required fields, especially the
phoneNumber.Consider adding input validation at the beginning of the
runmethod:async run({ $ }) { const { createContact, phoneNumber, email, firstName, lastName, param1, param2, param3, } = this; if (!phoneNumber) { throw new Error("Phone number is required."); } // ... rest of the method }This will ensure that the required
phoneNumberfield is provided before making the API call.
61-91:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling to the run method.
The run method is well-structured, but it lacks error handling. This could lead to unhandled exceptions if the API call fails.
Consider adding a try-catch block to handle potential errors:
async run({ $ }) { const { createContact, phoneNumber, email, firstName, lastName, param1, param2, param3, } = this; + try { const response = await createContact({ $, data: { contacts: [ { phone_number: phoneNumber, email, first_name: firstName, last_name: lastName, param_1: param1, param_2: param2, param_3: param3, }, ], }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully created a new contact."); return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to create contact: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async run({ $ }) { const { createContact, phoneNumber, email, firstName, lastName, param1, param2, param3, } = this; try { const response = await createContact({ $, data: { contacts: [ { phone_number: phoneNumber, email, first_name: firstName, last_name: lastName, param_1: param1, param_2: param2, param_3: param3, }, ], }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully created a new contact."); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create contact: ${error.message}`); throw error; } },components/smslink_nc/smslink_nc.app.mjs (6)
19-21:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle cases where
datamight be undefined or emptyThe
optionsmethod assumes thatdatais always an array. To prevent potential runtime errors whendatais undefined or empty, add a check before mapping.Update the method as follows:
const { object: { data } } = await this.getContacts(); + if (!Array.isArray(data) || data.length === 0) { + return []; + } return data.map(/* mapping function */);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
49-58:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling to
_makeRequestmethodCurrently, if the API call fails, the error is not caught, which could lead to unhandled promise rejections.
Consider adding a try-catch block:
async _makeRequest({ $ = this, path, headers, ...args } = {}) { + try { return await axios($, { ...args, debug: true, url: this.getUrl(path), headers: this.getHeaders(headers), }); + } catch (error) { + $.error(`API request failed: ${error.message}`); + } },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async _makeRequest({ $ = this, path, headers, ...args } = {}) { try { return await axios($, { ...args, debug: true, url: this.getUrl(path), headers: this.getHeaders(headers), }); } catch (error) { $.error(`API request failed: ${error.message}`); } },
11-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify
optionsmethod by removing the unusedmapperparameterIn the
contactIdprop definition, theoptionsmethod includes amapperparameter that's not passed when the method is called. Sincemapperis defined and used internally, you can remove it from the method's parameters for clarity.Apply this diff to simplify the method:
async options() { - mapper = ({ - id: value, phone_number: phoneNumber, first_name: firstName, last_name: lastName, - }) => ({ - value, - label: `${firstName || ""} ${lastName || ""} (${phoneNumber})`.trim(), - }), const { object: { data } } = await this.getContacts(); - return data.map(mapper); + return data.map(({ + id: value, phone_number: phoneNumber, first_name: firstName, last_name: lastName, + }) => ({ + value, + label: `${firstName || ""} ${lastName || ""} (${phoneNumber})`.trim(), + })); },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async options() { const { object: { data } } = await this.getContacts(); return data.map(({ id: value, phone_number: phoneNumber, first_name: firstName, last_name: lastName, }) => ({ value, label: `${firstName || ""} ${lastName || ""} (${phoneNumber})`.trim(), })); },
27-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consistent handling of
optionsmethod incampaignIdpropSimilar to the
contactIdprop, thecampaignIdprop'soptionsmethod can be simplified by removing unnecessary parameters and handling potential undefineddata.Apply this diff:
async options() { - const { object: { data } } = await this.getSMSCampaigns(); - return data.map(({ - id: value, title: label, - }) => ({ - value, - label, - })); + const { object: { data } } = await this.getSMSCampaigns(); + if (!Array.isArray(data) || data.length === 0) { + return []; + } + return data.map(({ + id: value, title: label, + }) => ({ + value, + label, + })); },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async options() { const { object: { data } } = await this.getSMSCampaigns(); if (!Array.isArray(data) || data.length === 0) { return []; } return data.map(({ id: value, title: label, }) => ({ value, label, })); },
72-76: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding pagination support to
getContactsIf the
/contactendpoint supports pagination, the current implementation might only retrieve the first page of results.Enhance the method to handle pagination parameters:
async getContacts(args = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/contact", + params: { + // Include pagination parameters if needed + page: args.page || 1, + per_page: args.per_page || 100, + }, ...args, }); },Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
77-81:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate responses in
getSMSCampaignsand handle errorsEnsure that the method checks the response structure and handles any API errors gracefully.
Consider updating the method:
async getSMSCampaigns(args = {}) { + try { const response = await this._makeRequest({ path: "/sms-campaign", ...args, }); + if (!response || !response.object || !Array.isArray(response.object.data)) { + throw new Error("Invalid response from SMS Campaigns API"); + } + return response; + } catch (error) { + this.$emit("Error fetching SMS campaigns: " + error.message); + return { object: { data: [] } }; + } },Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-sms-campaign/create-sms-campaign.mjs (2)
54-70:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid specifying 'type' when using 'propDefinition'
When using
propDefinition, thetypeis inherited from the referenced definition, so specifyingtype: "string[]"may be redundant and could potentially cause conflicts. Consider removing thetypeproperty to rely solely on thepropDefinition.Apply this diff to remove the redundant
typedefinition:- type: "string[]", label: "Recipients", description: "The recipients of the SMS campaign. Where each recipient should be a phone number.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.recipients: { label: "Recipients", description: "The recipients of the SMS campaign. Where each recipient should be a phone number.", propDefinition: [ app, "contactId", () => ({ mapper: ({ phone_number: value, first_name: firstName, last_name: lastName, }) => ({ value, label: `${firstName || ""} ${lastName || ""} (${value})`.trim(), }), }), ], },
94-107: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for the API request
Currently, there's no error handling for the API call to
createCampaign. To enhance robustness, consider adding a try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully and provide meaningful feedback.Apply this diff to add error handling:
async run({ $ }) { const { createCampaign } = this; const { title, sender, text, autoOptimizeText, autoRemoveBlocklistedNumbers, purpose, test, recipients, } = this; - const response = await createCampaign({ - $, - data: { - title, - sender, - text, - auto_optimize_text: autoOptimizeText, - auto_remove_blocklisted_numbers: autoRemoveBlocklistedNumbers, - purpose, - test, - recipients: recipients.map((phoneNumber) => ({ - phone_number: phoneNumber, - })), - }, - }); + try { + const response = await createCampaign({ + $, + data: { + title, + sender, + text, + auto_optimize_text: autoOptimizeText, + auto_remove_blocklisted_numbers: autoRemoveBlocklistedNumbers, + purpose, + test, + recipients: recipients.map((phoneNumber) => ({ + phone_number: phoneNumber, + })), + }, + }); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully created SMS campaign."); + return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to create SMS campaign: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async run({ $ }) { const { createCampaign } = this; const { title, sender, text, autoOptimizeText, autoRemoveBlocklistedNumbers, purpose, test, recipients, } = this; try { const response = await createCampaign({ $, data: { title, sender, text, auto_optimize_text: autoOptimizeText, auto_remove_blocklisted_numbers: autoRemoveBlocklistedNumbers, purpose, test, recipients: recipients.map((phoneNumber) => ({ phone_number: phoneNumber, })), }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully created SMS campaign."); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create SMS campaign: ${error.message}`); throw error; }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
components/smslink_nc/smslink_nc.app.mjs (5)
7-22: LGTM: Well-structured contactId property with minor enhancement opportunityThe
contactIdproperty is well-defined with appropriate type, label, and description. The asyncoptionsmethod effectively fetches and formats contacts for display.Consider adding input validation or error handling in the
optionsmethod to gracefully handle potential API errors or empty responses. For example:async options({ mapper = ... }) { try { const { object: { data = [] } } = await this.getContacts(); return data.map(mapper); } catch (error) { console.error("Error fetching contacts:", error); return []; } }This ensures the method always returns an array, even if the API call fails or returns unexpected data.
23-36: LGTM: Well-structured campaignId property with consistency suggestionThe
campaignIdproperty is well-defined with appropriate type, label, and description. The asyncoptionsmethod effectively fetches and formats SMS campaigns for display.For consistency with the
contactIdproperty, consider adding a defaultmapperparameter to theoptionsmethod:async options({ mapper = ({ id: value, title: label }) => ({ value, label }) } = {}) { const { object: { data } } = await this.getSMSCampaigns(); return data.map(mapper); }This change would make the two properties more consistent and allow for easier customization of the campaign options formatting if needed in the future.
39-41: LGTM: Functional getUrl method with room for improvementThe
getUrlmethod correctly constructs the API URL by appending the given path to the base URL.Consider making the base URL configurable:
- Add a
baseUrlproperty to the app's configuration:export default { type: "app", app: "smslink_nc", propDefinitions: { // ...existing propDefinitions }, methods: { // ...existing methods }, props: { baseUrl: { type: "string", label: "Base URL", default: "https://api.smslink.nc/api", }, }, };
- Update the
getUrlmethod to use this property:getUrl(path) { return `${this.baseUrl}${path}`; }This change would make the app more flexible and easier to configure for different environments or API versions.
49-57: LGTM: Well-structured _makeRequest method with room for enhancementThe
_makeRequestmethod is a well-implemented private helper for making API requests. It effectively uses thegetUrlandgetHeadersmethods to construct the request, and allows for customization through additional arguments.Consider adding error handling to provide more informative error messages:
async _makeRequest({ $ = this, path, headers, ...args } = {}) { try { return await axios($, { ...args, url: this.getUrl(path), headers: this.getHeaders(headers), }); } catch (error) { const statusCode = error.response?.status; const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.message || error.message; throw new Error(`Request failed with status ${statusCode}: ${errorMessage}`); } }This change would provide more detailed error information, making debugging easier for developers using this component.
70-80: LGTM: Well-implemented getContacts and getSMSCampaigns methods with room for enhancementThe
getContactsandgetSMSCampaignsmethods are correctly implemented as wrappers around the_makeRequestmethod, specifying the appropriate API paths.Consider adding pagination support to handle large datasets:
async getContacts(args = {}) { let allContacts = []; let page = 1; const perPage = 100; // Adjust based on API's default or requirements while (true) { const response = await this._makeRequest({ path: "/contact", params: { page, per_page: perPage, ...args.params }, ...args, }); allContacts = allContacts.concat(response.object.data); if (response.object.data.length < perPage) { break; } page++; } return { object: { data: allContacts } }; }Implement a similar change for
getSMSCampaigns. This enhancement would ensure that all data is retrieved when there are multiple pages of results, improving the robustness of these methods.components/smslink_nc/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (4)
9-52: Props configuration looks good, with a minor suggestion.The props are well-defined with appropriate types, labels, and descriptions. The use of optional fields provides flexibility for contact creation.
Consider adding validation for the
phoneNumberprop to ensure it follows a specific format (e.g., international phone number format). This can help prevent invalid data from being sent to the API.Example:
phoneNumber: { type: "string", label: "Phone Number", description: "The phone number of the contact in international format (e.g., +687123456).", pattern: "^\\+[1-9]\\d{1,14}$", },
53-60: createContact method looks good, but could benefit from error handling.The method correctly uses the app instance for making API calls and allows for flexible argument passing.
Consider adding error handling to the createContact method. This can help in catching and handling API errors more gracefully. Here's an example of how you could modify the method:
methods: { async createContact(args = {}) { try { return await this.app.post({ path: "/contact", ...args, }); } catch (error) { console.error("Error creating contact:", error); throw error; // Re-throw the error for the caller to handle } }, },
61-91: run method is well-structured, with suggestions for improvement.The method correctly implements the contact creation process and provides user feedback.
Consider the following improvements:
Add input validation before making the API call to ensure all required fields are present and correctly formatted.
Handle potential errors from the createContact method and provide more detailed error messages to the user.
Use object shorthand notation for better readability when all property names match the variable names.
Here's an example of how you could refactor the run method:
async run({ $ }) { const { createContact, phoneNumber, email, firstName, lastName, param1, param2, param3, } = this; if (!phoneNumber) { throw new Error("Phone number is required."); } try { const response = await createContact({ $, data: { contacts: [ { phone_number: phoneNumber, email, first_name: firstName, last_name: lastName, param_1: param1, param_2: param2, param_3: param3, }, ], }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully created a new contact with phone number ${phoneNumber}.`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create contact: ${error.message}`); throw error; } },
1-92: Overall implementation is solid and meets the PR objectives.The "Create Contact" action is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. It provides a complete solution for creating contacts in the SMSlink system.
Key strengths:
- Clear and detailed prop definitions
- Proper use of the app instance for API calls
- Structured run method with appropriate data formatting
Areas for improvement:
- Enhanced error handling in the createContact method
- Input validation in the run method
- More detailed user feedback in success and error cases
These improvements would enhance the robustness and user-friendliness of the component.
To further improve the component's architecture and reusability:
Consider extracting the contact data formatting logic into a separate method. This would make the code more modular and easier to test.
Implement a schema validation library like Joi or Yup for more comprehensive input validation. This could be set up as a shared utility across multiple smslink_nc components.
Create a common error handling utility that can be used across all smslink_nc components to ensure consistent error reporting and logging.
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-sms-campaign/create-sms-campaign.mjs (3)
39-47: Consider expanding 'purpose' options or clarify limitation.The 'purpose' prop currently has only one option: "push". This might be limiting if there are other potential purposes for SMS campaigns.
Consider either:
- Expanding the options if other purposes are applicable, or
- Adding a comment explaining why "push" is the only available option.
If "push" is indeed the only valid purpose, you might want to consider making it a constant rather than an option.
80-107: Consider adding error handling and input validation.While the
runmethod is well-implemented, it could benefit from additional error handling and input validation.Consider adding:
- Try-catch block to handle potential errors from the API call.
- Input validation for required fields before making the API call.
- Checks for edge cases, such as empty recipients list.
Example:
async run({ $ }) { const { createCampaign, title, sender, text, recipients, // ... other properties } = this; if (!title || !sender || !text || !recipients || recipients.length === 0) { throw new Error("Missing required fields"); } try { const response = await createCampaign({ $, data: { // ... your existing data object }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully created SMS campaign."); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create SMS campaign: ${error.message}`); throw error; } }
108-110: Consider handling error cases in the export statement.While exporting a success summary is good for user feedback, it doesn't account for potential error scenarios.
Consider wrapping the export and return statements in a try-catch block to handle potential errors. This will ensure that users receive appropriate feedback even if an error occurs.
Example:
try { const response = await createCampaign({ /* ... */ }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully created SMS campaign."); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create SMS campaign: ${error.message}`); throw error; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- components/smslink_nc/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/actions/create-sms-campaign/create-sms-campaign.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-contact/delete-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-sms-campaign/delete-sms-campaign.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/smslink_nc.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-contact/delete-contact.mjs
- components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-sms-campaign/delete-sms-campaign.mjs
- components/smslink_nc/common/utils.mjs
- components/smslink_nc/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
components/smslink_nc/smslink_nc.app.mjs (4)
1-1: LGTM: Appropriate import for HTTP clientThe import of
axiosfrom "@pipedream/platform" is correct and follows ES6 module syntax. This is a suitable choice for making API requests in the smslink_nc application.
42-48: LGTM: Well-implemented getHeaders methodThe
getHeadersmethod effectively constructs the headers for API requests. It correctly includes the Authorization header using the personal access token from the app's authentication. The method also allows for additional headers to be passed and merged, which provides flexibility for different API endpoints.The use of the spread operator to merge additional headers is a good practice, allowing for easy customization of headers when needed.
58-69: LGTM: Concise and effective post and delete methodsThe
postanddeletemethods are well-implemented wrappers around the_makeRequestmethod. They correctly set the HTTP method and allow for additional arguments to be passed through.These methods follow the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle by leveraging the
_makeRequestmethod, which is a good practice. The concise implementation makes the code easy to read and maintain.
1-80: Overall assessment: Well-implemented SMSlink integration with minor enhancement opportunitiesThe changes in this file successfully implement the core functionality for interacting with the SMSlink API, aligning with the PR objectives of introducing new action components for SMSlink. The code is generally well-structured, follows good practices, and provides a solid foundation for the SMSlink integration.
Key strengths:
- Clear and consistent method implementations
- Effective use of ES6 features like destructuring and default parameters
- Modular design with reusable methods for API interactions
Suggested enhancements:
- Implement error handling in the
_makeRequestmethod- Add pagination support for
getContactsandgetSMSCampaignsmethods- Make the base URL configurable for improved flexibility
- Add input validation in the
optionsmethods ofpropDefinitionsThese enhancements would further improve the robustness and maintainability of the SMSlink integration.
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM: Import and action configuration look good.The import statement and action configuration are well-structured. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is helpful for developers.
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-sms-campaign/create-sms-campaign.mjs (4)
1-9: LGTM: Imports and action metadata are well-defined.The imports and action metadata are correctly implemented. The action is properly versioned and described, which is good for maintainability and documentation.
10-71: LGTM: Props are well-defined and comprehensive.The props object is well-structured with clear types, labels, and descriptions for each property. The use of optional flags and default values enhances flexibility. The custom mapper for the 'recipients' prop improves user experience by providing a formatted display label.
72-79: LGTM: createCampaign method is concise and flexible.The
createCampaignmethod is well-implemented. It leverages the app'spostmethod, which likely handles common concerns like authentication. The use of default parameters and the spread operator provides flexibility in how arguments are passed.
80-107: LGTM: run method is well-structured and logical.The
runmethod is implemented effectively. It properly destructures the necessary properties and methods, constructs the data object for the API call, and uses a utility function to parse the recipients. The code is readable and follows a clear logical flow.
jcortes
force-pushed
the
smslink-nc-new-components
branch
from
9f11c45
to
9869c19
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
components/smslink_nc/smslink_nc.app.mjs (3)
6-37: LGTM: Well-structured propDefinitions with dynamic optionsThe
contactIdandcampaignIdpropDefinitions are well-implemented with clear labels and descriptions. The asyncoptionsmethods provide a good way to dynamically populate select fields with data from the API.Minor suggestion: Consider adding error handling in the
optionsmethods to gracefully handle API request failures.You could add a try-catch block in the
optionsmethods:async options() { try { const { object: { data } } = await this.getSMSCampaigns(); return data.map(({ id: value, title: label }) => ({ value, label })); } catch (error) { console.error("Error fetching SMS campaigns:", error); return []; } }
39-41: LGTM: URL construction method, with room for improvementThe
getUrlmethod correctly constructs the API URL. However, consider making the base URL configurable for better flexibility.Consider modifying the method to use a configurable base URL:
getUrl(path) { const baseUrl = this.$auth.base_url || "https://api.smslink.nc/api"; return `${baseUrl}${path}`; }This change would allow for easier testing and potential environment-specific configurations.
49-57: LGTM: Solid request method implementation, consider adding error handlingThe
_makeRequestmethod is well-implemented, utilizing axios and correctly incorporating thegetUrlandgetHeadersmethods. The use of default parameters and destructuring enhances flexibility.Consider adding error handling to improve robustness:
async _makeRequest({ $ = this, path, headers, ...args } = {}) { try { return await axios($, { ...args, url: this.getUrl(path), headers: this.getHeaders(headers), }); } catch (error) { console.error(`Request failed for path ${path}:`, error.message); throw error; } }This change would provide better logging and allow for custom error handling if needed.
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-sms-campaign/create-sms-campaign.mjs (1)
39-47: Consider expanding or clarifying the 'purpose' options.The 'purpose' prop currently has only one option: "push". This seems limiting and might not cover all potential use cases for SMS campaigns.
Consider either:
- Expanding the options to include other common SMS campaign purposes, or
- If "push" is indeed the only valid purpose, consider removing the 'options' array and using a fixed value, or add a comment explaining why only this option is available.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- components/smslink_nc/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/actions/create-sms-campaign/create-sms-campaign.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-contact/delete-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-sms-campaign/delete-sms-campaign.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/smslink_nc/smslink_nc.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- components/smslink_nc/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs
- components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-contact/delete-contact.mjs
- components/smslink_nc/actions/delete-sms-campaign/delete-sms-campaign.mjs
- components/smslink_nc/common/utils.mjs
- components/smslink_nc/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
components/smslink_nc/smslink_nc.app.mjs (6)
1-1: LGTM: Appropriate import for HTTP clientThe import of
axiosfrom "@pipedream/platform" is correct and aligns with the needs of this application for making API requests.
42-48: LGTM: Well-implemented headers construction methodThe
getHeadersmethod is well-implemented. It sets the necessary headers, including the Authorization token, and allows for additional headers to be passed and merged efficiently using the spread operator.
58-69: LGTM: Concise and correct implementation of POST and DELETE methodsThe
postanddeletemethods are well-implemented. They correctly utilize the_makeRequestmethod with appropriate HTTP methods. The use of default empty objects forargsprovides flexibility, and the implementation follows the DRY principle.
70-75: LGTM: Well-implemented method for retrieving contactsThe
getContactsmethod is correctly implemented. It uses the_makeRequestmethod with the appropriate path, and the use of a default empty object forargsprovides flexibility. The method is concise and follows the established pattern in the file.
76-80: LGTM: Consistent implementation for retrieving SMS campaignsThe
getSMSCampaignsmethod is well-implemented and consistent with thegetContactsmethod. It correctly uses the_makeRequestmethod with the appropriate path, and the use of a default empty object forargsprovides flexibility. This consistency in implementation across similar methods is commendable.
1-80: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectivesThe changes in this file successfully implement the core functionality for the smslink_nc application, addressing the main objectives outlined in the PR:
- Methods for creating and deleting contacts are facilitated through the
postanddeletemethods, along with thegetContactsmethod for retrieving contact data.- Similarly, methods for creating and deleting SMS campaigns are supported through the
postanddeletemethods, withgetSMSCampaignsfor retrieving campaign data.The implementation is solid, with well-structured code that follows consistent patterns. There's room for minor improvements in error handling and configuration flexibility, but overall, the code meets the requirements and provides a good foundation for the SMSlink integration.
To ensure all required endpoints are correctly implemented, let's verify the API paths:
✅ Verification successful
API endpoints implementation verified successfully
All required API endpoints (
/contactand/sms-campaign) are correctly implemented incomponents/smslink_nc/smslink_nc.app.mjs. The code meets the verification criteria.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify API endpoints implementation echo "Checking for required API endpoints..." required_endpoints=("/contact" "/sms-campaign") for endpoint in "${required_endpoints[@]}"; do if rg -q "path: \"$endpoint\"" components/smslink_nc/smslink_nc.app.mjs; then echo "✓ Found implementation for $endpoint" else echo "✗ Missing implementation for $endpoint" fi doneLength of output: 539
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-sms-campaign/create-sms-campaign.mjs (4)
1-9: LGTM: Imports and action metadata are well-defined.The imports and action metadata are correctly set up. The action is properly versioned and described, which is good for maintainability and documentation.
10-71: LGTM: Props are well-defined and comprehensive.The props object is well-structured with clear types, labels, and descriptions for each property. The use of optional flags and default values enhances flexibility. The custom mapper for recipients is a nice touch for improved user experience.
80-110: LGTM: Well-structured run method with clear logic.The run method is well-organized, with good use of destructuring for clarity. The data object construction is straightforward and the use of optional chaining in the recipients mapping is a nice touch.
1-111: Overall, excellent implementation aligned with PR objectives.This implementation of the "Create SMS Campaign" action for SMSlink is well-structured, comprehensive, and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. It covers all the required functionalities such as setting campaign title, sender, text, and handling recipients.
Key strengths:
- Clear and descriptive prop definitions with appropriate types and descriptions.
- Flexible handling of optional parameters.
- Good use of utility functions and app methods.
- Concise and readable code structure.
Areas for improvement:
- Enhanced error handling and response validation in both
createCampaignandrunmethods.- Clarification or expansion of the 'purpose' options.
These improvements will further enhance the robustness and reliability of the action. Great job on implementing this new component!
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-sms-campaign/create-sms-campaign.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-sms-campaign/create-sms-campaign.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/smslink_nc/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jcortes
force-pushed
the
smslink-nc-new-components
branch
3 times, most recently
from
3b9c233
to
495e16d
Compare
jcortes
force-pushed
the
smslink-nc-new-components
branch
from
495e16d
to
de4e84d
Compare
|
/approve |
WHY
SMSlink: New action components
Resolves #14120
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
smslink_nccomponent.