Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade pouchdb-live-find from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0 #4

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link

@snyk-bot snyk-bot commented May 5, 2020

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade pouchdb-live-find from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.
  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 3 years ago, on 2017-05-07.
Release notes
Package name: pouchdb-live-find
  • 0.4.0 - 2017-05-07

    I refactored some of the internals to get this working again after the release of PouchDB 6.2.0.

  • 0.3.0 - 2017-01-13

    Upgraded dependencies to support pouchdb-find v0.10.x and pouchdb v.6.x.x

from pouchdb-live-find GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: pouchdb-live-find
  • 6bebee8 fix bower.json, version bump 0.4.0
  • 34468d3 fix breaking changes caused by merge into monorepo
  • 569a3ad removed yarn due to travis error
  • 50a856c test on node LTS

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

PhearZero and others added 2 commits November 17, 2017 09:02
🪲 PouchDB - Cannot read property 'force' of undefined
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants