Skip to content

chore(submodule): promote Pmoves-Health-wger → c75f2fb (289-commit upstream sync) - #2418

Merged
POWERFULMOVES merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/promote-wger-gitlink
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

POWERFULMOVES merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/promote-wger-gitlink

Conversation

@POWERFULMOVES

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Promotes Pmoves-Health-wger gitlink from df314dfc75f2fb on PMOVES.AI-Edition-Hardened.

What's new from upstream (289 commits):

  • New wger.trophies app (Django app + API views + URLs)
  • Django 5.2.7 → 5.2.8 bump
  • All Dependabot bumps (docker/setup-qemu-action, etc.)

PMOVES hardening preserved (13 commits):

  • healthz + metrics endpoints
  • NATS signal handlers (Django Signals → NATS publisher)
  • CHIT sensitivity toggles
  • Docker hardened architecture (non-root, apt-get CVE patches)
  • GHCR-first CI workflow with optional DockerHub
  • PMOVES.AI integration dossier

Conflict resolution: Only 1 conflict in docker.yml CI workflow — kept PMOVES GHCR-first pattern. All other files auto-merged (upstream trophies + PMOVES observability coexist).

Built in isolated worktree. 1-file gitlink change.

💘 Generated with Crush

Syncs wger fork with upstream/master (289 commits). Brings in the new
trophies app, Django 5.2.8, and all Dependabot bumps. All 13 PMOVES
hardening commits preserved (healthz, metrics, NATS signals, CHIT
sensitivity, Docker hardening, Trivy CVE fixes, GHCR-first CI).
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@POWERFULMOVES, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 58 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6bd284ac-c2f0-4460-91e4-529540cc509b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ae6a99 and fbc36e7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Pmoves-Health-wger

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@POWERFULMOVES
POWERFULMOVES merged commit 77facea into main Aug 5, 2026
17 checks passed
@POWERFULMOVES
POWERFULMOVES deleted the chore/promote-wger-gitlink branch August 5, 2026 21:09

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: fbc36e78de

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread Pmoves-Health-wger
@@ -1 +1 @@
Subproject commit df314df02d56d5291801a33b7d908e61a7663bbd
Subproject commit c75f2fb801ca6c28685c01ddca9e3a4d1b469386

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Restore Wger DB envs before promoting

Promoting this gitlink pulls in c75f2fb where settings/main.py no longer falls back to sqlite when no DB env is present: unless PS_DATABASE_URI is set it unconditionally reads DJANGO_DB_ENGINE/DJANGO_DB_DATABASE. I checked the PMOVES launch path (make up-external uses pmoves/docker-compose.external.yml), and that service still only passes DJANGO_DEBUG, WGER_USE_GUNICORN, TIME_ZONE, etc.; neither it nor env.shared.example defines those DJANGO_DB_* keys. In that configuration the upgraded image fails during Django settings import before serving Wger, so the pointer needs matching compose/env changes or restored defaults before promotion.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment thread Pmoves-Health-wger
@@ -1 +1 @@
Subproject commit df314df02d56d5291801a33b7d908e61a7663bbd
Subproject commit c75f2fb801ca6c28685c01ddca9e3a4d1b469386

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Trigger Wger image validation for gitlink updates

This commit changes only the Pmoves-Health-wger gitlink, but I checked .github/workflows/integrations-ghcr.yml and its push/PR paths filters list many integration submodules while omitting Pmoves-Health-wger. Because the default runtime image is ghcr.io/powerfulmoves/pmoves-health-wger:pmoves-latest, merging this promotion by itself will not validate or publish a Wger image from the promoted branch in the parent GHCR workflow; add the submodule path to both filters or update the image publication path alongside the pointer.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant