-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Barriers to access to education #6
Comments
Dependent variables (Outcome): defined by access basic education, access education, ever attended school, no schools, mixed education - Pending to define how these variables were measured to identify assumptions and choose the most suitable to represent access to education Independent variables:
Potential analyses:
Next steps:
|
This looks like a really good plan Claudia! Well done! I think this will be a good guide for the team when you start coding in our class on Monday! Looking forward to it! |
Team @OxfordIHTM/rock-lee, just checking in to see how you guys are doing? I have seen some code from you guys since two session ago but have not seen any commits and/or pull requests with new material. How are things going? Need any help? How far have you gone with the steps above that you said you will be doing? |
Team @OxfordIHTM/rock-lee, I saw code contributed to the I think I am understanding where you are trying to do but not clear where you are headed. Start showing in code where you are headed by getting towards output/s that organise and present the point/result that you are getting and the answers that you want to share to your audience (which in this case is the Federal Ministry of Health in Sudan). Another thing to note as well is to not forget to answer the original question which is "What are the barriers to pre-school education in Sudan?". Finally, in as much as it is nice to see fancy analysis and models to show correlation and association, don't forget the "basic" and "simple" stuff as well - the data already has information from the mothers of reasons why their children are not in school. A "simple" or "basic" presentation/visualisation of these responses I think is very powerful beyond the model or the correlations mainly because it comes from the mothers themselves. Using that data acknowledges their responses and gives importance to this kind of information. |
Team @OxfordIHTM/rock-lee, great to see you guys at work today. I know you were able to get to a point where you have code to show results in plots etc. But I haven't seen a pull request yet. No problem at all and if you still want to work on this then I will wait until you PR. But if you want to move on and sort of keep this as it is now, let me know as well and let me know which branch has all the latest things you have done and I will take it from there. If you want to see how the output report is currently looking right now, here is the current draft - https://oxford-ihtm.io/ihtm-hackathon-2024. Once you have a PR, then I can check that and get your stuff ready for merge to main and once merged, your stuff will get included into the report. You guys have done well! Thank you for all the effort and time you have spent on this and on the module! |
Hie Ernest
I hope this email finds you well.
We committed and pushed our worked yesterday soon after class. I came and
requested for your help with that when I hadn’t saved the work and you
helped me right at the end of the session. I am not sure what may have gone
wrong.
All the codes are there on my RStudio. Would you be able to help on what
may have went wrong and how to rectify it?
Regards,
Phill(on behalf of RockLee)
…On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 22:22, Ernest Guevarra ***@***.***> wrote:
Team @OxfordIHTM/rock-lee
<https://github.com/orgs/OxfordIHTM/teams/rock-lee>, great to see you
guys at work today.
I know you were able to get to a point where you have code to show results
in plots etc. But I haven't seen a pull request yet. No problem at all and
if you still want to work on this then I will wait until you PR. But if you
want to move on and sort of keep this as it is now, let me know as well and
let me know which branch has all the latest things you have done and I will
take it from there.
If you want to see how the output report is currently looking right now,
here is the current draft - https://oxford-ihtm.io/ihtm-hackathon-2024.
Once you have a PR, then I can check that and get your stuff ready for
merge to main and once merged, your stuff will get included into the report.
You guys have done well! Thank you for all the effort and time you have
spent on this and on the module!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC3JH45TWZ52KFOCPJNECUTYWZAT5AVCNFSM6AAAAABCZPXQRGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZZG4ZTOMRSGU>
.
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Thanks for letting me know. I agree, you committed and pushed. But I don't think you made a pull request. No problem. I can find it from this end. I will get it onto the report now. Well done! |
Team @OxfordIHTM/rock-lee, thanks for the clarification. I have not processed your inputs from the Some quick feedback:
Remember that your topic is about education and that dataset covers children aged 6-59 months old. In Sudan, pre-school education is from 4 - 6 years old and basic education starts formally at 6 years old. If you paused to ask yourselves, you may have made this connection but just because of this, any child in the sample who is less than 4 years old will have a response of NA not because the data is missing or that they didn't respond to the question but because the question does not apply to them. So, the appropriate approach her would have been to filter out children less than 4 years (47 months and younger). I think your analysis would have been more meaningful with this in mind. I can understand that the task was mainly a coding task and you focused on that. And I give you all full merit for this. I do hope that despite that, you don't lose focus on the question that is being asked.
Well done everyone! |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: