Skip to content

fix(hardware-testing): handle non-Location locs#18345

Merged
sfoster1 merged 1 commit intoedgefrom
fix-hardware-testing-lint
May 14, 2025
Merged

fix(hardware-testing): handle non-Location locs#18345
sfoster1 merged 1 commit intoedgefrom
fix-hardware-testing-lint

Conversation

@sfoster1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it is.

This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it is.
@sfoster1 sfoster1 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 14, 2025 13:46
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jbleon95 jbleon95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whoops, this slipped through cause of #18268. Thanks for catching and fixing this

@sfoster1 sfoster1 merged commit 9219014 into edge May 14, 2025
12 checks passed
@sfoster1 sfoster1 deleted the fix-hardware-testing-lint branch May 14, 2025 16:30
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
ddcc4 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
This wasn't handling the return values of this method properly, now it
is.

(cherry picked from commit 9219014)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants