Skip to content

Conversation

@Antonio-jb
Copy link
Contributor

@Antonio-jb Antonio-jb commented Jul 27, 2025

Description

This PR removes the default thick black border that appears around checkboxes in the project list UI. The updated style makes the interface cleaner and more modern.

There was no existing issue open that I could find, but this is a small visual improvement that aligns with the current design system.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • UI polish / visual improvement

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Ran bun run lint — no lint errors from my changes
  • Ran bunx biome format --write . — formatted project
  • Used bunx biome check page.tsx — verified no warnings in modified file
  • Visually tested changes in local development

Test Configuration:

  • Node version: 22.14.0.
  • Browser: Chrome (latest)
  • OS: Windows 11

Screenshots

Before:

CheckboxBorder-Before

Checkbox had thick black border (default browser style).

After:

CheckboxBorder-After

Checkbox now has cleaner, consistent styling matching the app.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have added screenshots if UI has been changed
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I ran formatting and linting tools
  • I have added tests (N/A for this small visual change)
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes (no new tests added)
  • No documentation changes needed

Additional context

This is a small front-end contribution focused on improving visual clarity. Let me know if you'd like the checkbox style further refined or adjusted for accessibility. I'm happy to iterate.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style

    • Updated checkbox container styling in project cards for a more rounded appearance.
    • Improved code formatting for editor action handlers to enhance consistency.
  • Chores

    • Added IDE configuration files for project structure and version control settings.
    • Included the @types/node package as a development dependency.
    • Added Git ignore rules for IDE-specific and local configuration files.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 27, 2025

👷 Deploy request for appcut pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ef5d8c2

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 27, 2025

@Antonio-jb is attempting to deploy a commit to the OpenCut OSS Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 27, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

This change introduces several IDE configuration files for IntelliJ IDEA, updates the @types/node development dependency in both the root and web app package manifests, and makes a minor visual adjustment to the checkbox container styling in the project card selection mode. No logic or control flow is affected.

Changes

Files/Groups Change Summary
.idea/.gitignore, .idea/OpenCut.iml, .idea/modules.xml, .idea/vcs.xml Added IntelliJ IDEA project configuration files and gitignore for IDE-specific files
apps/web/package.json, package.json Added @types/node as a development dependency
apps/web/src/app/projects/page.tsx Adjusted checkbox container styling: width/height reduced to 4 units and made fully rounded
apps/web/src/hooks/use-editor-actions.ts Refactored handler definitions for consistent formatting; no logic changes

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagram generated as the changes are limited to configuration, dependency updates, and minor styling adjustments without affecting control flow.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the warren IDEs now play,
With configs tucked safely away.
A checkbox gets its rounded cheer,
While Node types quietly appear.
Little tweaks, a gentle nudge,
The code hops on—no need to judge!
🐇✨
"""

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df3b092 and ef5d8c2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/app/projects/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/web/src/app/projects/page.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
apps/web/src/app/projects/page.tsx (1)

402-410: Tailwind class w-4.9 / h-4.9 is invalid – sizing will be lost

4.9 isn’t part of Tailwind’s default spacing scale, and without the arbitrary-value syntax (w-[1.225rem]) no CSS will be generated. The element will therefore collapse to width:auto; height:auto, re-introducing the browser-default checkbox border on some screens.

-            <div className="w-4.9 h-4.9 rounded-full bg-background/80 backdrop-blur-sm border flex items-center justify-center">
+            <div className="w-5 h-5 rounded-full bg-background/80 backdrop-blur-sm border flex items-center justify-center">

(or use w-[1.25rem] h-[1.25rem] if you need a custom size).

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
apps/web/package.json (1)

72-76: Avoid duplicating workspace-wide devDependencies

The root package.json already contains @types/node; adding it again here can cause version drift if one entry is bumped and the other is forgotten.

-    "@types/node": "^24.1.0",

Rely on the hoisted version from the monorepo root, or reference it via "workspace:*" if you really need it locally.

.idea/vcs.xml (1)

1-6: Re-evaluate committing IDE project files

.idea XML files (vcs.xml, modules.xml, *.iml) are typically user-specific and tend to create noisy diffs & merge conflicts. Unless the team has a documented policy for checking them in, consider:

  1. Adding .idea/ to the repo-root .gitignore.
  2. Keeping only share-worthy settings (e.g. code-style) under .idea/ and ignoring the rest.

This keeps the VCS clean and editor-agnostic.

.idea/OpenCut.iml (1)

1-12: IDE-specific module file may be better kept out of Git

.iml files encode absolute paths ($MODULE_DIR$/.tmp, etc.) that vary per machine and can produce hard-to-resolve merge conflicts. If the team chooses to keep them, ensure they are:

  • Generated deterministically (no absolute user paths).
  • Updated through a single IDE version across contributors.

Otherwise, ignore them alongside other .idea artefacts.

.idea/modules.xml (1)

1-8: Avoid committing IDE-specific metadata to the repo

.idea/* files are local-environment artefacts. Keeping them in version control can cause noisy diffs, merge conflicts, and lock the team into a single IDE. Prefer adding .idea/ to the root .gitignore, or move the shared settings to an IDE-agnostic location (e.g. editorconfig).

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14475dc and df3b092.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • .idea/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • .idea/OpenCut.iml (1 hunks)
  • .idea/modules.xml (1 hunks)
  • .idea/vcs.xml (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/src/app/projects/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/src/hooks/use-editor-actions.ts (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: simonorzel26
PR: OpenCut-app/OpenCut#324
File: apps/web/src/components/editor/timeline/timeline-content.tsx:9-34
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T08:22:10.492Z
Learning: User simonorzel26 prefers incremental refactoring approach: moving code first to reduce PR complexity, then cleaning up in separate single-responsibility PRs. This strategy prioritizes safety and manageable PR sizes over immediate perfect code structure.
Learnt from: simonorzel26
PR: OpenCut-app/OpenCut#324
File: apps/web/src/components/editor/snap-indicator.tsx:43-43
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T08:26:10.961Z
Learning: In the timeline refactor PR #324, the snap indicator component in apps/web/src/components/editor/snap-indicator.tsx requires the hard-coded `ml-48` class in addition to the calculated `leftPosition` for proper alignment. This is intentional and needed for the new timeline layout.
apps/web/src/app/projects/page.tsx (1)

Learnt from: simonorzel26
PR: #324
File: apps/web/src/components/editor/snap-indicator.tsx:43-43
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T08:26:10.961Z
Learning: In the timeline refactor PR #324, the snap indicator component in apps/web/src/components/editor/snap-indicator.tsx requires the hard-coded ml-48 class in addition to the calculated leftPosition for proper alignment. This is intentional and needed for the new timeline layout.

🔇 Additional comments (3)
package.json (1)

5-7: Align @types/node version with the Node runtime used in CI/production

@types/node@^24.1.0 targets the (yet-to-be-released) Node v24 API surface, while the project README & PR description mention local testing on Node 22 .x. Mismatched type definitions can silently surface as inaccurate IntelliSense or TS errors once newer globals/APIs creep in.

-    "@types/node": "^24.1.0",
+    "@types/node": "^22.2.0",

Please verify which Node version your deployment and CI runners actually use and pin the type definitions accordingly (or bump the runtime everywhere).

.idea/.gitignore (1)

1-8: 👍 Good call ignoring volatile IDEA artefacts

Explicitly black-listing shelf/, workspace.xml, httpRequests/, and datasource files prevents accidental commits of local state.

apps/web/src/hooks/use-editor-actions.ts (1)

29-36: Ignore deps-array suggestion for useActionHandler
The third argument of useActionHandler is an activation flag/ref (MutableRefObject<boolean> | boolean | undefined), not a React-deps array. Passing undefined simply means “always active.” The hook’s internal effect already manages its own subscriptions and dependencies. You can disregard the suggestion to supply [] or drop the explicit undefined.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

@mazeincoding mazeincoding changed the base branch from main to staging July 27, 2025 22:14
mazeincoding added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2025
@mazeincoding mazeincoding merged commit 95c53e4 into OpenCut-app:staging Jul 29, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@mazeincoding
Copy link
Collaborator

thanks :)

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2025
15 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants