Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated native template to fix null async return #6168

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 5, 2020

Conversation

laballab
Copy link
Contributor

@laballab laballab commented May 4, 2020

Fixes issue: #6157
@wing328 @UkonnRa @joerg-wille

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • If contributing template-only or documentation-only changes which will change sample output, build the project before.
  • Run the shell script(s) under ./bin/ (or Windows batch scripts under.\bin\windows) to update Petstore samples related to your fix. This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit, and these must match the expectations made by your contribution. You only need to run ./bin/{LANG}-petstore.sh, ./bin/openapi3/{LANG}-petstore.sh if updating the code or mustache templates for a language ({LANG}) (e.g. php, ruby, python, etc).
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master, 4.3.x, 5.0.x. Default: master.
  • Copy the technical committee to review the pull request if your PR is targeting a particular programming language.

@AceHack
Copy link

AceHack commented May 4, 2020

I can't wait for this PR to get approved since it fixes my issue!! :). Thanks @laballab

@bbdouglas (2017/07) @sreeshas (2017/08) @jfiala (2017/08) @lukoyanov (2017/09) @cbornet (2017/09) @jeff9finger (2018/01) @karismann (2019/03) @Zomzog (2019/04) @lwlee2608 (2019/10) @bkabrda (2020/01)

@AceHack
Copy link

AceHack commented May 4, 2020

/retest

@AceHack
Copy link

AceHack commented May 4, 2020

How can we retest, the failing test is unrelated and seems to just be a flakey test.

@laballab
Copy link
Contributor Author

laballab commented May 4, 2020

Not sure why the Swift check failed as this this doesn't touch any Swift stuff..

Possible to retest?

Copy link
Member

@wing328 wing328 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@wing328 wing328 merged commit 30ee3f3 into OpenAPITools:master May 5, 2020
@wing328 wing328 changed the title Fix #6157: Updated native template to fix null async return Updated native template to fix null async return May 5, 2020
michaelpro1 pushed a commit to michaelpro1/openapi-generator that referenced this pull request May 7, 2020
…rn (OpenAPITools#6168)

* Fix OpenAPITools#6157: Updated native template to fix null async return

Should fix issue: OpenAPITools#6157

* fixed uncaught json exception in java native api gen

* cleaning up

Co-authored-by: Luis Ballabeni <[email protected]>
jimschubert added a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2020
…-5.0

* origin/master: (78 commits)
  [powershell-experimental] : http signature authentication implementation (#6176)
  Add missing AnyType type mapping (#6196)
  remove pubspec.lock (#6208)
  Minor fixes post-release (#6204)
  [cpp][Qt5] Add the ability to pass QNetworkAccessManager as a parameter  (#6053)
  comment out dart2 test due to failure
  adds the missing typeMapping for AnyType (#6199)
  [Rust Server] Support boolean headers, and fix panic handling headers (#6056)
  update samples
  update 5.0.0 release date
  update readme with new release
  Prepare 4.3.1 release (#6187)
  Fix #6157: Updated native template to fix null async return (#6168)
  Show description when summary is missing (#6159)
  Make the array items optional (#6132)
  [aspnetcore] test petstore samples in drone.io (#6148)
  fix bearer auth in c# netcore async call (#6136)
  skip web.config for aspnetcore 3.x (#6147)
  Adds memoization and deserialization through 2 or more discriminators (#6124)
  Implement Asp.Net Core 3.0/3.1 generator (#6009) (#6025)
  ...
@wing328 wing328 added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Jul 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants