Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Java] fix default value for JsonNullable #14703

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Feb 16, 2023
Merged

[Java] fix default value for JsonNullable #14703

merged 13 commits into from
Feb 16, 2023

Conversation

wing328
Copy link
Member

@wing328 wing328 commented Feb 15, 2023

to fix #14583

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package 
    ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • In case you are adding a new generator, run the following additional script :
    ./bin/utils/ensure-up-to-date.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master (6.3.0) (minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks), 7.0.x (breaking changes without fallbacks)
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

cc @bbdouglas (2017/07) @sreeshas (2017/08) @jfiala (2017/08) @lukoyanov (2017/09) @cbornet (2017/09) @jeff9finger (2018/01) @karismann (2019/03) @Zomzog (2019/04) @lwlee2608 (2019/10)

@cachescrubber (2022/02) @welshm (2022/02) @MelleD (2022/02) @atextor (2022/02) @manedev79 (2022/02) @javisst (2022/02) @borsch (2022/02) @banlevente (2022/02) @Zomzog (2022/09)

@wing328 wing328 marked this pull request as ready for review February 15, 2023 15:33
Copy link
Contributor

@welshm welshm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should there be unit tests for this to prevent it from breaking again?

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ public class {{classname}}{{#parent}} extends {{{parent}}}{{/parent}}{{^parent}}
{{#openApiNullable}}
{{^required}}
if (this.{{name}} == null{{#isNullable}} || !this.{{name}}.isPresent(){{/isNullable}}) {
this.{{name}} = {{#isNullable}}JsonNullable.of({{{defaultValue}}}){{/isNullable}}{{^isNullable}}{{{defaultValue}}}{{/isNullable}};
this.{{name}} = {{#isNullable}}JsonNullable.of({{/isNullable}}{{{defaultValue}}}{{^defaultValue}}new {{#uniqueItems}}LinkedHashSet{{/uniqueItems}}{{^uniqueItems}}ArrayList{{/uniqueItems}}<>(){{/defaultValue}}{{#isNullable}}){{/isNullable}};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Worth noting the change for uniqueItems here - could/should there be a unit test?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks like an updated sample but not a test from the diff?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, tests are always better. will do it in a separate PR with more tests.

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ public class {{classname}}{{#parent}} extends {{{parent}}}{{/parent}}{{^parent}}
{{#openApiNullable}}
{{^required}}
if (this.{{name}} == null{{#isNullable}} || !this.{{name}}.isPresent(){{/isNullable}}) {
this.{{name}} = {{#isNullable}}JsonNullable.of({{{defaultValue}}}){{/isNullable}}{{^isNullable}}{{{defaultValue}}}{{/isNullable}};
this.{{name}} = {{#isNullable}}JsonNullable.of({{/isNullable}}{{{defaultValue}}}{{^defaultValue}}new {{#uniqueItems}}LinkedHashSet{{/uniqueItems}}{{^uniqueItems}}ArrayList{{/uniqueItems}}<>(){{/defaultValue}}{{#isNullable}}){{/isNullable}};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks like an updated sample but not a test from the diff?

@wing328 wing328 requested a review from borsch February 16, 2023 02:37
@wing328 wing328 merged commit 71c2abf into master Feb 16, 2023
@wing328 wing328 deleted the java-default2 branch February 16, 2023 02:37
@wing328
Copy link
Member Author

wing328 commented Feb 16, 2023

I've merged it so that users in #14583 can test it more easily.

Will file another PR to add more tests.

Thanks for the quick review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants