Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix jackson-databind (Java) security issue #1259

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2018
Merged

Conversation

wing328
Copy link
Member

@wing328 wing328 commented Oct 17, 2018

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Ran the shell script under ./bin/ to update Petstore sample so that CIs can verify the change. (For instance, only need to run ./bin/{LANG}-petstore.sh and ./bin/security/{LANG}-petstore.sh if updating the {LANG} (e.g. php, ruby, python, etc) code generator or {LANG} client's mustache templates). Windows batch files can be found in .\bin\windows\.
  • Filed the PR against the correct branch: master, 3.4.x, 4.0.x. Default: master.
  • Copied the technical committee to review the pull request if your PR is targeting a particular programming language.

Description of the PR

Updated jackson-databind version to 2.8.11.2 to address the issue.

@wing328
Copy link
Member Author

wing328 commented Oct 18, 2018

cc @bbdouglas (2017/07) @JFCote (2017/08) @sreeshas (2017/08) @jfiala (2017/08) @lukoyanov (2017/09) @cbornet (2017/09) @jeff9finger (2018/01)

@wing328 wing328 changed the title Fix jackson-databind security issue Fix jackson-databind (Java) security issue Oct 18, 2018
@wing328 wing328 merged commit c1afba7 into master Oct 18, 2018
@wing328 wing328 deleted the fix-jackson-databind branch October 18, 2018 08:44
A-Joshi pushed a commit to ihsmarkitoss/openapi-generator that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2019
* fix jackson databind security issue

* fix java jersey 1 dependency

* fix java webclient dep
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant