Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[C++][Pistache] fix float literals in C++ Pistache codegen #11483

Merged

Conversation

JulianGmp
Copy link
Contributor

Small fix that ensures the float literals (written for default values) in the generated C++ code are suffixed with an f.
Before, this could cause a compile break because the literal would be interpreted as for example an integer before.
Note: this might be different for certain C++ compilers, I've encountered this with GCC 10.2.1.

It's a bit of a hack but hey it works.

Also: I ran the generate-samples script and did not encounter any changed files, so maybe this is an edge case not caught by the examples.

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package 
    ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master (5.3.0), 6.0.x
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.
    Cc @ravinikam (2017/07) @stkrwork (2017/07) @etherealjoy (2018/02) @MartinDelille (2018/03) @muttleyxd (2019/08)

@wing328 wing328 added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Feb 7, 2022
@wing328 wing328 merged commit 9e1972b into OpenAPITools:master Feb 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants