-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Link rel
type for public sharing of UDP
#405
Comments
Interesting topic, indeed. There's definitely room for alignment. What seems most logical here is the relation type I'll draft a PR for this. |
…s without requiring Bearer authentication. #405
See the commit above, which makes the canonical relation type apply generally and not just to jobs. So UDP sharing or batch jobs are a use-case here. Please let me know if there's still room for improvement. |
I'm currently working on a proof of concept implementation of public sharing of UDPs.
One of building blocks is how the owner of the UDP can obtain a publicly sharable URL (e.g. signed URL) pointing to the UDP metadata (including process graph).
The easiest solution is probably just adding a link to the "links" field of the UDP's metadata at
/process_graphs/{process_graph_id}
.Standardizing UDP sharing as a whole will probably be a big task, but I think it's already possible to settle on the
rel
type of that link.I couldn't find a suitable one in the list of standardized link relations referenced from https://openeo.org/documentation/1.0/developers/api/reference.html#section/API-Principles/Web-Linking .
At the moment I'm using
"rel": "public"
, but I'm open for better suggestions.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: