-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 418
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix folder deletion with VSCode #1821
Merged
filipw
merged 12 commits into
OmniSharp:master
from
savpek:feature/attempt-to-fix-folder-deletion-1
Jun 6, 2020
Merged
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
52cdbd1
Initial working version
savpek 20d4023
Refactoring for onDirectoryRemove method
savpek aa7896a
Refactored folder -> directory
savpek de8484a
Added path directory char to make sure only files under directories a…
savpek f7f423f
Added path separator to make sure only files under folder
savpek 10c3668
Added test for removed dir
savpek 92f41d9
Small refactoring for tests
savpek a62d7d6
Testfixes
savpek 8e89cce
Merge branch 'master' into feature/attempt-to-fix-folder-deletion-1
savpek e90ea72
Review fix
savpek e428565
Merge branch 'feature/attempt-to-fix-folder-deletion-1' of https://gi…
savpek b5f3952
Rebuild
savpek File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ public enum FileChangeType | |
Unspecified = 0, | ||
Change, | ||
Create, | ||
Delete | ||
Delete, | ||
DirectoryDelete | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isn't this going to end up calling OnDocumentRemoved twice on a file? once from here as a file and then again through the directory?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
True, i will remove that part as it's unnecessary.
Original idea were to hide directory removal specifics from subscribers of file watcher, however since it uses other than full paths (extensions etc) too it were not possible and this was left behind from that version.
Removed at e90ea72