[jonahgabriel]

Summary

• Adds contracts/OMN-10063.yaml — ticket contract for OMN-10063 (Task 1.5 of OMN-9582: create EnumContractCompleteness in omnibase_core)
• Required by the receipt gate on omnibase_core PR fix(OMN-10331): backfill migrate_dod_contracts against legacy gh pr commands #951

Ticket

OMN-10063

dod_evidence

- id: dod-001
  description: "Contract YAML validates against OCC schema"
  source: manual
  status: complete
  evidence_artifact: "uv run validate-yaml contracts/OMN-10063.yaml → [OK] All 1 file(s) valid"

Test plan

• uv run validate-yaml contracts/OMN-10063.yaml — passes
• Pre-commit Require dod_evidence on ticket contracts hook — passes
• CI green via gh pr checks --watch

[skip-receipt-gate: contract-only PR adding a new YAML artifact, no code changes]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Implemented enhanced validation and quality assurance processes to ensure stricter code completeness standards are consistently maintained and verified during development cycles.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new contract manifest YAML file (OMN-10063.yaml) is added to define requirements and evidence criteria for implementing EnumContractCompleteness in omnibase_core, specifying unit test execution and CI/PR checks validation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Contract Manifest contracts/OMN-10063.yaml	New YAML contract file defining requirements for the EnumContractCompleteness feature, including pytest execution criteria and manual dod_evidence validation checks for enum file presence, exports, tests, CI status, and target branch.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Poem

🐰 A contract born, all shiny and new,
Enums shall sparkle—complete through and through!
Tests pass with pride, CI checks all aligned,
Evidence gathered, no detail unsigned.
Hop forward, dear PR, to main you will go! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding a contract YAML file for the OMN-10063 ticket related to EnumContractCompleteness work.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch jonah/omn-10063-contract

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

contracts/OMN-10063.yaml (1)

38-43: Consider a more precise CI check pattern.

The current command gh pr checks ... | grep -c 'pass' | grep -qv '^0$' works but could match "pass" in check names or other contexts. A more precise pattern might check for specific status indicators (e.g., ✓ or column-based parsing of gh pr checks output).

However, the current approach is functional for basic validation.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@contracts/OMN-10063.yaml` around lines 38 - 43, The CI check under id dod-004
uses a loose grep for 'pass' that may match unrelated text; update the
check_value command to match the check-status symbol or explicit status field
instead (e.g., match lines that start with the checkmark or the exact success
token). Replace the current check_value value in dod-004 with a more precise
pipeline such as using gh pr checks ... | grep -E '^[[:space:]]*✓' | wc -l and
asserting non-zero, or use gh pr checks --json/--format to read the check
conclusion (e.g., filter for "conclusion":"SUCCESS"), so the check only counts
actual successful checks rather than any occurrence of the word "pass".

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In `@contracts/OMN-10063.yaml`:
- Around line 38-43: The CI check under id dod-004 uses a loose grep for 'pass'
that may match unrelated text; update the check_value command to match the
check-status symbol or explicit status field instead (e.g., match lines that
start with the checkmark or the exact success token). Replace the current
check_value value in dod-004 with a more precise pipeline such as using gh pr
checks ... | grep -E '^[[:space:]]*✓' | wc -l and asserting non-zero, or use gh
pr checks --json/--format to read the check conclusion (e.g., filter for
"conclusion":"SUCCESS"), so the check only counts actual successful checks
rather than any occurrence of the word "pass".

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6d6c2355-986c-4121-b5a5-d2f091b39bdd

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b6763c and a3e5539.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• contracts/OMN-10063.yaml