Skip to content

evidence(OMN-19194): second-actor OCC evidence for omnimarket#2783 - #10851

Closed
jonahgabriel wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
jonah/omn-19194-occ-companion-omnimarket-2783
Closed

jonahgabriel wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
jonah/omn-19194-occ-companion-omnimarket-2783

Conversation

@jonahgabriel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OMN-19194

Hand-authored companion for OmniNode-ai/omnimarket#2783, per the OMN-15247 hand-authoring path. occ-autobind declined that PR with skip:NO_RED_DERIVABLE_CHECK -- a single workflow-file diff has no changed-file candidate that can go RED against the merge base. Content-bound evidence instead, against the fix commit's own pinned ref.

…et#2783

occ-autobind declined with skip:NO_RED_DERIVABLE_CHECK for
OmniNode-ai/omnimarket#2783 -- a single workflow-file diff has no
changed-file candidate that can go RED against the merge base. Per the
OMN-15247 hand-authoring path, this companion carries content-bound evidence
against the fix commit's own pinned ref instead: the omnimarket diff adds
the \`product_conclusion=timeout\` branch this contract's item names.
@jonahgabriel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by the autobind-minted companion OCC#10850, which landed automatically once omnimarket#2783 picked up a RED-derivable test in commit 0a5aefc87d. My hand-authored evidence here was against the pre-hardening head (ca9d2dd53) and is no longer the PR's current state -- standing down in favor of the official autobind path.

@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel deleted the jonah/omn-19194-occ-companion-omnimarket-2783 branch November 1, 2026 16:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant