[jonahgabriel]

Summary

Declares worktree_reconcile_hosts in scripts/application-relation-ownership.yaml (db_io.db_tables) ahead of its node, the same declare-then-create split as omnimarket#3046 (demo_readiness_latest) and #2958 (claude_hook_events). Regenerates docs/evidence/OMN-15423-relation-inventory.json (source_declared_tables 87 to 88, created count unchanged because no SQL lands here) and adds tests/test_omn19399_worktree_reconcile_ownership_declared.py. No SQL, node package or exemption is added.

Why this is a dev-head fix

omnibase_infra#4266 vendored the worktree_reconcile migrations and merged, but its ownership gate passed only against omnimarket#3047's manifest through a source-ref override. On the dev push the gate reads the pinned omnimarket manifest, which has no declaration, so Application Database Domain Enforcement fails with "requires exactly one ownership declaration" for omninode_internal.worktree_reconcile_hosts. omnimarket#3047 carries the same manifest entry but is red on its own checks. Landing this declaration on omnimarket dev, then advancing the omnibase_infra pin, clears the dev head without waiting for #3047. The entry is byte-compatible with #3047's, so #3047 drops the duplicate hunk on its next merge with dev.

Validation

• New test: 0 matches against the origin/dev manifest (fails), 1 match here (passes).
• test_application_relation_inventory.py, the new test and the demo_readiness ownership test: 15 passed.
• generate_application_relation_inventory.py --check exits 0.
• omnibase_infra check_application_database_sql.py against the merged omnibase_infra migrations: the demo_readiness violations cleared by the pending pin advance (omnibase_infra#4278); the worktree_reconcile violations are the ones this manifest entry answers.

Merge order

1. This PR. 2. Pin advance in omnibase_infra (bot refresh). 3. omnimarket#3047 later.

Refs OMN-19399, OMN-17292.

Lab: manifest and evidence only, no runtime surface, so no dev-lane pass applies. Host: launching Mac, lane none, command uv run pytest on the three test files plus the inventory generator --check. Observation: 15 passed, generator in sync.

Evidence-Ticket: OMN-19399
Evidence-Source: OCC#11772

[github-actions]

✅ Architectural Review — PASSED

Errors: 0
Warnings: 0

What this checks

Rule	Description
ARCH-TOPIC-001	No hardcoded Kafka topic strings in handler code
ARCH-DI-001	No event_bus=None bypass
ARCH-DI-002	No direct Handler instantiation outside workflow_runner/adapters
ARCH-DI-003	No reinvented DI containers
ARCH-TOPIC-002	contract.yaml topics follow `onex.{cmd

---

No architectural violations found.

Static architectural lint — no model inference (OMN-14176).

[github-actions]

✅ Hostile Reviewer — PASSED

Blocking findings (critical/error): 0
Total findings: 10
Models succeeded: qwen3-review,gpt-oss-review

---

Gate semantics

Verdict	Meaning	Blocks merge?
passed	>=2 models succeeded, no critical/error findings	No
blocked	CRITICAL or ERROR findings found	Yes
degraded	Fewer than 2 models succeeded (infra unavailable/timeout)	Yes (OMN-15110)

Powered by omniintelligence.review_pairing.cli_review — node-based adversarial review via HandlerLlmCliSubprocess (OMN-8524)

[jonahgabriel]

Closing as superseded. omnimarket#3047 merged to dev at 2026-09-29T08:09:55Z (e726d7d) with the identical worktree_reconcile_hosts declaration in scripts/application-relation-ownership.yaml, present exactly once, so this pull request now conflicts with dev in the manifest, the relation inventory evidence file and its inventory test. The one thing not on dev is the regression test file for the declaration, which is dropped here. The omnibase_infra ownership red is cleared by advancing the omnimarket pin there, not by this pull request.